BETA

8 Amendments of Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL related to 2010/0048(APP)

Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 - point vi
vi. givenacknowledge that the current economic climate, might lead the budgetary authority to make some efforts to considerwards reprioritisation within the budget through the establishment of positive and negative priorities while bearing in mind however the European added value of the EU budget since it is an expression of solidarity and efficiency by pooling together financial resources otherwise dispersed at national, regional and local level; emphasise as well that an overwhelming part of the EU budget expenditures support long-term investments necessary to stimulate EU economic growth;
2010/07/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 - point vii
vii. recognise that these new needs cannot be met only through redeployment or reprioritisation and use of available flexibility mechanisms, without a revision of the MFFthat a revision of the MFF and the flexibility mechanisms included in the IIA is necessary, contrary to the Council's position as set out in its conclusions of 16 March 2010 on the budget guidelines for 2011 and reaffirmed by the Presidency-in- office in its statements during the 15 June 2010 debate on oral question B7- 0310/2010 O- 0074/2010; and that,recall furthermore that new needs stemming from the entry into force of the Lisbon TreatyTreaty of Lisbon should logically entail savings at national and regional level;
2010/07/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 - point ix
ix. recognise that their position of the Council and the Commission on the revision of the MFF until now is contradictory with the fact that they are constantly coming up with new proposals calling for new resources such as the "Bananas Agreement" (the Council) and ITER (the Commission)and ITER;
2010/07/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 - point ix a (new)
ixa. express its concern considering the trend developed by Member States towards launching European policies financed outside of the EU budget; measure the risk of a lack of democratic control and legitimacy over those policies as well as a breach of the principle of universality of the EU budget and the negative impact this trend might imply with regard to the principle of solidarity; (See amendment point xv)
2010/07/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 - point x
x. take all necessary steps for a revision of the MFF providing the extra resources necessary to deliver the European External Action Service and other Lisbon-Treaty- related policy priorities, as well as other initiatives, particularly under Heading 1a "Competitiveness Growth and Employment" and Heading 4 "External Relations", providing EU added value allowing the EU to meet its commitments and its citizens’ expectations;
2010/07/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 - point xiii
xiii. recognise the importance of flexibility to create reserves and margins allowing the EU to respond to current and future needs, both within the financial framework, within and between headings (such as was necessary to find the resources for Galileo, the Food Facility and the Economic Recovery Plan for example), and in negotiations over its establishment and revision; take note of the fact that Parliament is not prepared to accept any loss ofincreased flexibility norand enter into negotiations over any proposals that do notwould guarantee at least the current stronger degree of flexibility ove, including increasing the threshold for revisions to the financial framework of up to 0,03% of EU GNI (referred to in Article 8(3) of the proposal for a MFF Regulation), as well as increasing the amount available through the Flexibility Instrument and simplifying the procedure for shifting resources between the different Headings of the MFF;
2010/07/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 - point xv
xv. express its concern considering the trend developed by Member States to launch European policies financed outside of the EU budget; measure the risk of a lack of democratic control and legitimacy over those policies as well as a breach of the principle of universality of the EU budget and the negative impact this trend might imply with regard to the principle of solidarity; (See amendment point ix a )deleted
2010/07/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 - point xvi
xvi. given its possible far-reaching budgetary consequences, give further thought to the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism ahead of the adoption of the MFF regulation; accept that both arms of the budgetary authority be involved in decisions concerning the impact this mechanism could have on the EU budget; agree that any possible budgetary needs linked to this mechanism should be financed through an ad-hoc revision of the MFF and that therefore arrangements need to be found within the IIA to ensure a smooth effective and efficient cooperation between the institutions and to provide the necessary transparency;
2010/07/23
Committee: BUDG