BETA

30 Amendments of Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL related to 2012/2092(BUD)

Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that its priorities for the 2013 budget, as detailed in its above-mentioned resolution of 4 July 2012 on the mandate for the trilogue, consist in support for growth, competitiveness and employment, particularly for SMEs and youth; points out once again that the Commission's draft budget (DB) reflects Parliament's priorities as regards the programmes and initiatives to be reinforced towards these objectives;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that EU transport policy is key to achieving the priority of sustainable growth of the Europe 2020 Strategy and, facilitating the functioning of the EU internal market, boosting the quality of services and increasing territorial cohesion;
2012/07/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Reminds fiscal consolidation efforts undertaken by most Member States in national budgets; considers that the draft budget strikes an appropriate and reasonable balance between the fiscal austerities on the one side and need to implement EU programmes and deliver EU added value on the other one; emphasises that such efforts must not curb the added value of these programmes, as they are designed to stimulate economic growth;
2012/07/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Council to ensure that the necessary budgetary resources are made available to cover outstanding payments;
2012/07/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the TEN-T programme, through investment in high European added value infrastructures, is essential to raise the competitiveness of the EU as a whole, and to boost territorial cohesion and economic growth, by creating the missing infrastructure and removing bottlenecks within the internal market; and highlights that infrastructure projects also directly contribute to growth by stimulating employment during the building phase; underlines the role of the TEN-T programme for meeting the adaptation to climate change goal by ensuring the future sustainability of the EU transport networks; calls for adequate funding of the TEN-T Executive Agency to be able to cope with preparatory work for the implementation of the Connecting Europe Facility.
2012/07/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Is fully aware of the severe difficulties arising from the state of the national economies and of the need for a responsible and realistic reading; cannot accept, however, the approach according to which the EU budget is made the source for possible savings with the same proportion and logic applied to the national budgets, given their substantial difference in nature, objectives and structure; highlights that decreasing EU resources will surely result in a lack of investments and liquidity in the Member States, thus aggravating the problems they are facing;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that the EU budget is to be seen instead as a complementary instrument of support for the Member States' economies, capable of concentrating initiatives and investments in areas strategic for growth and jobs and of bringing an actual added value leverage effect in sectors overcoming national boundaries; highlights that such a role is legitimised by the same Member States, who, together with Parliament, are responsible for the decisions from which most of the EU law stems;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that 2013 is the last year of the current multiannual financial framework (MFF), which makes it of the utmost importance to reach a balance between commitments undertaken so far and payments deriving from them that need to be honoured, the institutional credibility of the EU being at stake as well as possible legal consequences for the Commission in case of missing reimbursement of legitimate payment claims;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Due to the recent years' experience, does not deem the declaration of payments proposed by the Council in its reading as a sufficient guarantee that an adequate level of payments will eventually be made available for all headings; takes the general approach, therefore, of restoring, at the level of DB payments cut by Council in all headings and to increase payment appropriations over DB on a selected number of lines characterised by high levels of implementation within each heading, in particular Headings 1a and 4, to cover the actual needs of the corresponding programmes, as identified by the Commissionfew lines;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Regrets that the Council departed substantially (all in all by EUR 2,15 billion), as regards commitments, from the financial programming figures, which result from a joint decision with Parliament at the beginning of the programming period, as well as that Council completely disregarded Parliament's priorities, as expressed in Parliament's mandate for the trilogue; recalls that Parliament's reading is based instead upon, and coherent with, these benchmarks from that mandate;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Is of the opinion that the answer to the crisis must be more Europe and not less Europe, in order to restart investments and help rebuild confidence in the economy; having already criticised the proposed freezing in commitment appropriations at the level of the expected inflation rate in the DB, cannotregrets the modest level of commitment appropriations in the DB adopted by the Commission as underlined in the the Parliament's resolution of 4 July 2012 on the mandate for trilogue; cannot therefore accept Council's decision to reduce them further down to 1,27% compared to budget 2012; recalls that commitments reflect EU political priorities and should be set having in mind a long term perspective where the economic downturn might be over; therefore takes the view that, as a general principle, commitments should be restored at the DB level; intends, however, tointends to slightly increase commitment appropriations above the DB on a selected number offew budget lines directly related to the delivery of the Europe 2020 priorities and in line with traditional Parliament's priorities;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Makes clear that if a sufficient level of appropriations in payments and commitments will not be found, the Parliament is ready not to accept an agreement with the Council on the budget 2013;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Deplores that, although this is the key heading for the delivery of the Europe 2020 objectives, Heading 1a bears practically the totality of the Council's cuts in commitments (-2,9% compared to DB) in Heading 1 and is the most affected as regards decreases in payments (-EUR 1,9 billion or -14% compared to DB); decides to undo almost all cuts by Council and to reinforcslightly increase above DB in commitment and payments only a selected number of lines directly linked to the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy and characterised by high levels of implementation and strong absorption capacity;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. In particular, highlights that the strong cuts affectingStrongly regrets that, instead of increasing appropriations for the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) and the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) programmes are, Council decided to cut the Commission's proposal on corresponding budget lines, which is in clear contradiction with the recent European Council's decision to create a «Compact for growth» supporting, among others, research and development, innovation and employment; recalls the very good performances of these programmes, for which Commission reports accelerated implementation in 2012 compared to last year;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Rejects the cuts introduced by the Council on Heading 1b, which would lead to a much more serious shortage in payments than already expected and would impede the correct execution of projects during the last year of the programming periodreimbursement for already spent resources to the beneficiary member states and regions; points out again that this heading is responsible for two thirds of the current outstanding commitments and that cutting the level of payments for 2013 would also lead to a strong increase in the level of RAL by the end of next year; asks therefore the Commission to present an analysis on the situation of RAL and a sound strategy how the level of RAL should be reduced; calls on the Commission to provide Parliament with information on a monthly basis on the breakdown per Members State and Fund of the claims submitted for reimbursement;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Does not consider the Council's declaration asking the Commission to submit a draft amending budget in case of insufficient payments under Heading 1b as a sufficient guarantee that an adequate level of payments will be made available in 2013, given that similar commitments have been already undertaken and disregarded by the Council in the past two years; asks the Council Presidency to make a public statement and explain the discrepancy between the Council's reading on payments and the actual needs of Members States, as expressed in their estimates;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. UrgeCompels the Council to agree on Draft amending budget XX/2012 presented by the Commission with the aim to compensate the shortage of payment appropriations this year and to avoid blocking the execution of running projects at the end of the programming period; gives mandate to its delegation in the framework of the negotiations with the Council, should the Council not be ready to approve in full the DAB, to possibly increase payment appropriations by the amount rejected by Council, distributing it pro rata between all the operational lines of Heading 1b;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Considers that the Commission's estimates of budgetary needs are more realistic than the Council's proposalforecast figures, in particular in the light of forthcoming payments and considering the current economic uncertainty; restores therefore Council's cuts under this Heading to a level of EUR 60 307,51 million, which is 0,6% above the 2012 budget;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Rejects the increase of the so-called negative expenditure line (clearance of accounts) as this appears to be set artificially high of Heading 2 appropriations and partly restores Commission's proposal, allowing a more realistic approach; considers, however, that Member States may be in a better position to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of their national supervision and control systems in the area of agricultural policy;deleted
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Maintains the budget allocation dedicated to the Food Distribution Programme for the Most Deprived Persons in the EU that supports 18 million people with problems of malnutrition within the Union; welcomes the effort made by the Commission in finding a political and legal solution to continue with the programme in 2013; hopes that a solution for the continuation of the programme during the next MFF period will be found;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
35. Provides for a continued support on a commensurate level for the LIFE+ programme, which gives priority solely to environment and climate action projects; recalls again that environmental problems and their solutions do not recognise national borders, thus dealing with it at EU level is self-evident; in this respect, calls on the Member States to significantly improve their implementation of EU environmental legislation;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
40. Stresses that measures aimed at combating gender violence must be sufficiently funded; eEmphasises the important role that the programme for preventing and combating all forms of violence (DAPHNE) has played in eliminating violence against women and girls in the , and therefore increases its payment appropriations above the level of the DBEU;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
41. Cannot accept Council cuts on agencies under Heading 3a, which represent a decrease by EUR 2,8 million in both CA and PA, as agencies represent 18% of the overall appropriations under Heading 3a and the Council cuts would have a disproportionate impact on this heading; intends, therefore, to restore the proposed DB, which seems to establish a balanced equilibrium level;deleted
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
43. Reiterates that fostering youth employment and activitya sense of active citizenship, solidarity and tolerance among young Europeans are essential for Europe to be able to exploit the talents of the best-educated generation in history; has therefore decided to increase funding for the Youth in Action programme compared to DB, especially considering the sound implementation of the programme for many years running;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
45. Supports the continuation of the successful preparatory action «European partnerships on sport», considering the novel competences bestowed upon the Union by the Lisbon Treaty in the field of sports, with a particular focus on grassroots and mass sport, promoting fairness in sporting competitions by fighting against match-fixing and protecting the physical and moral integrity of sportsmen and sportswomen;deleted
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
46. Highlights that cuts in payments brought by Council to Heading 4 (-EUR 1 billion or -14,1% as compared to DB) represent approximately 20% of the overall cuts across all headings; considers that such a massive reduction would impede the Union to respect the commitments to which it has committed itself on the world scene; notes that the Commission's proposal was only slightly above the level of the 2012 budget and already substantially reduced compared to the financial programming; therefore takes the general approachdecides to restore the level of both commitment and payment appropriations in most budget lines to the levels proposed in the DB;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47
47. Considers, however, that, on the basis of the implementation levels and with the view to a responsible reading, some decreases compared to the DB can be accepted in some budget lines, such as Macro-Financial Assistance, membership of international organisations in the field of customs and tax and cooperation with Greenland;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
48. Underlines, on the contrary, the need for additional financing on a selected number of lines cut by Commission in comparison with the 2012 budget and corresponding toProposes a small increase in the level of commitment and payment appropriations above the DB for budget lines in the areas of geographical development cooperation, as well as for the Electoral Observation Mission and the Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria; therefore proposes an increase in the level of commitment and payment appropriations above the DB for these budget lines;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49
49. Points out that, in accordance with the declaration signed by the Commission and UNRWA on EU support for UNRWA (2011-2013), the EU's annual contribution is based on the 2011 Palestinian allocation (EUR 300 million), and a reduction in that reference amount willould have a knock-on effect on the allocation for UNRWA; believes that increased funding for Palestine and UNRWA is crucial for ensuring that UNRWA is given the necessary resources it needs to provide the essential services for which it has been mandated by the UN General Assembly and to safeguard the safety and livelihood of refugees in the light of the instability in the region;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 52
52. Takes note of Council's position, which decreaseding Commission's proposal on Heading 5 – All sections by EUR 146 million overall, despite the institutions' efforts, as reflected in their estimates and the DB, towards budget consolidation of administrative expenditure, at a time of economic and budgetary constraints at national level;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG