5 Amendments of Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL related to 2012/2307(BUD)
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the "draft package" agreed, after difficult negotiations, by Parliament and Council during the Trilogue of 29 November 2012 consists of three elements: the Amending Budget No 6/2012 for EUR 6 billion, partially covering the shortage of payments inup to 31st October 2012, the Union Budget for the year 2013 set to a level of EUR 150 898,391 million and EUR 132 836,988 million, respectively in commitment and payment appropriations and three joint statements ensuring that the actual payment needs in 2012 and 2013 will be duly covered;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. WelcomesNotes that the overall level of commitments appropriations agreed, which represents an increase of EUR 1,1 billion compared to the original reading of the Council; is, but a slight decrease compared to the Commission's draft budget ; is however pleased that the biggest part of its political priorities is secured in next year's budget, with particular emphasis on the proper implementation of the EU commitment for growth and jobs, as identified in the Europe 2020 strategy;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that the overall level of payment appropriations agreed for 2013 decreases by 2,15 % compared to Budget 2012 as finally executed;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that, due to the intransigent position of the Council in the negotiations, the overall level of payments set is EUR 5 billion lower than the Commission's estimates for payment needs in their draft budget for 2013; is concerned that this level of appropriations will be insufficient to cover the actual payments needs of next year; i and to swiftly implement the "growth and jobs "convinced, however, that the cost of a non agreement would imply much mmpact agreed by the European Council in June 2012; requests the Commission to provide monthly reports to Parliament and Council on the evolution of Member States' ( breakdown per Member State and per fund) payment claims fore serious consequences and a much more negative impact on the implementation of the Union actions and programmes; tructural funds, cohesion fund ,rural development and fisheries funds from 31 October 2012 onwards; calls for an interinstitutional working group on payments to be set up, where the two arms of the budgetary authority should present joint conclusions on how to proceed;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Reaffirms its view that, in the meantime, the Commission should explore the possibility of excluding, in a spirit of solidarity and consistency, Member States' gross GNI-based contributions to the Union Budget from the calculation of the structural deficit as defined in the 'two-pack' and in the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union;