BETA

Activities of Evelyn REGNER related to 2011/0284(COD)

Legal basis opinions (0)

Amendments (85)

Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation
Title
Proposal for a REGULATIONDIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on a Common European Sales Lawthe harmonisation of certain aspects of the obligation relating to the guarantee of conformity in connection with consumer sales contracts, related services and digital content
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) There are still considerable bottlenecks to cross-border economic activity that prevent the internal market from exploiting its full potential for growth and job creation. Currently, only one in ten traders in the Union exports goods within the Union and the majority of those who do, only export to a small number of Member States. From the range ofOf all the obstacles to cross- border trade including, tax regulations, administrative requirements, delivery difficulties in delivery, language and culture, traders consider the difficulty in finding out the provisions of a foreign contract law among the top barriers in business-to-consumer transactions and in business-to-business transactions. This also leads to disadvantages for consumers due to limited access to goods. Different national contract laws therefore deter the exercise of fundamental freedoms, such as th have been identified as the greatest barriers . In spite of recently adopted Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights1, which harmonises the main aspects of distance contracts, there are still a number of differences between national provisions of consumer contract law. Those differences can be freedom to provide goods and services, and representgarded as barriers to the functioning and continuing establishment of the internal market. They also have the effect of limiting competition, particularly in the markets of smaller Member States__________________ 1 OJ. L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 64.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Contracts are the indispensable legal tool for every economic transaction. However, the need for traders to identify or negotiate the applicable law, to find out about the provisions of a foreign applicable law often involving translation, to obtain legal advice to make themselves familiar with its requirements and to adapt their contracts to different national laws that may apply in cross-border dealings makes cross-border trade more complex and costly compared to domestic trade. CIt is therefore necessary to complement Directive 2011/83/EU by updating the legal provisions governing certain aspects of the obligation relating to the guarantee of conformity in connection with consumer sales contract-law-s, related barriers are thus a major contributing factor in dissuading a considerable number of export-oriented traders from entering cross-border trade or expanding their operations into more Member States. Their deterrent effect is particularly strong for small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) for which the costs of entering multiple foreign markets are often particularly high in relation to their turnover. As a consequence, traders miss out on cost savings they could achieve if it were possible to market goods and services on the basis of one uniform contract law for all their cross-border transactions and, in the online environment, one single web-sitservices and digital content. This updating process should to take account of the needs of the digital economy and the relevant rulings of the European Court of Justice.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The agreement to use the Common European Sales Law should be a choice exercised within the scope of the respective national law which is applicable pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 or, in relation to pre- contractual information duties, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non- contractual obligations (Regulation (EC) No 864/2007)20 , or any other relevant conflict of law rule. Thus the agreement to use the Common European Sales Law ishould therefore not amount to, and not be confused with, a choice of the applicable law within the meaning of the conflict-of- law rules and should be without prejudice to them. This Regulation will therefore not affect any of the existing conflict of law rulesIn relation to Article 6 (2) Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I), the protection afforded to the consumer by provisions of the law of the country where the consumer has his habitual residence cannot be derogated from by the agreement to use CESL.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) While Directive 2011/83/EU lays down provisions on the passing of risk in respect of goods, it remains necessary to complement those provisions by similar provisions on digital content, too, and, in the process, take account of the specific features of those products.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) All the matters of a contractual or non-contractual nature that are not addressed in the Common European Sales Law are governed by the pre-existing rules of the national law outside the Common European Sales Law that is applicable under Regulations (EC) No 593/2008 and (EC) No 864/2007 or any other relevant conflict of law rule. These issues include legal personality, the invalidity of a contract arising from lack of capacity, illegality or immorality, the determination of the language of the contract, matters of non-discrimination, representation, plurality of debtors and creditors, change of parties including assignment, set-off and merger, property law including the transfer of ownership, intellectual property law and the law of torts. Furthermore, the issue of whether concurrent contractual and non- contractual liability claims can be pursued together falls outside the scope of the Common European Sales Lis Directive are governed by the pre-existing rules of national law.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. The purpose of this RegulationDirective is to improve the conditions for the establishment and the functioning of the internal market by making available a uniform set of contract law rules as set ensuring a high level of consumer protection which takes account in Annex I (‘the Common European Sales Law’). These ruleof new technologies, too, by harmonising certain aspects of the laws, regulations can be used for cross-border transactd administrative provisions ofor the sale of goods, for the supply of digital content and for related services where the parties to a contract agree to do soMember States with regard to certain aspects of the obligation relating to the guarantee of conformity, related services and digital content in connection with contracts concluded between consumers and traders.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation enables traders to rely on a common set of rules and use the same contract terms for all their cross- border transactions thereby reducing unnecessary costs while providing a high degree of legal certainty.deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. In relation to contracts between traders and consumers, this RegulationThis Directive comprises a comprehensive set of consumer protection rules to ensure a high level of consumer protection, to enhance consumer confidence in the internal market and encourage consumers to shop across borders.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Save as otherwise provided in this Directive, Member States may maintain or introduce national laws ensuring a higher level of consumer protection which depart from the provisions of this Directive.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Should one or more Member States avail itself of the possibility under paragraph 3a, the relevant provisions shall be in conformity with the Treaties and notified to the Commission. The Commission shall subsequently ensure that that information is easily accessible to consumers and traders, inter alia on a dedicated website.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. The enjoyment of other national rights concerning traders' contractual and noncontractual obligations shall be without prejudice to the consumer rights harmonised by this Directive.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point e
(e) 'trader' means any natural or legal person who is actingperson or any legal person, irrespective of whether privately or publicly owned, who is acting, including through any other natural or legal person acting in his name or on his behalf, for purposes relating to that person’his trade, business, craft, or profession in relation to contracts;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point q – point i
(i) concluded in the simultaneous physical presence of the trader or, where the trader is a legal person, the natural person representing the trader and the consumer in a place which is not the trader's business premises, or concluded on the basis of an offer made by the consumer in the same circumstances; or
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point q – point ii
(ii) concluded on the trader's business premises of the trader or through any means of distance communication immediately after the consumer was personally and individually addressed in a place which is not the trader's business premises of the trader in the simultaneous physical presence of the trader or, where the trader is a legal person, a natural person representing the trader and the consumer; or
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point q – point iii
(iii) concluded during an excursion organised by the trader or, where the trader is a legal person, the natural person representing the trader with the aim or effect of promoting and selling goods or supplying digital content or related services to the consumer;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3
The parties may agree that the Common European Sales Law governs their cross- border contracts for the sale of goods, for the supply of digital content and for the provision of related services within the territorial, material and personal scope as set out in Articles 4 to 7.Article 3 deleted Optional nature of the Common European Sales Law
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4
1. The Common European Sales Law may be used for cross-border contracts. 2. For the purposes of this Regulation, a contract between traders is a cross-border contract if the parties have their habitual residence in different countries of which at least one is a Member State. 3. For the purposes of this Regulation, a contract between a trader and a consumer is a cross-border contract if: (a) either the address indicated by the consumer, the delivery address for goods or the billing address are located in a country other than the country of the trader's habitual residence; and (b) at least one of these countries is a Member State. 4. For the purposes of this Regulation, the habitual residence of companies and other bodies, corporate or unincorporated, shall be the place of central administration. The habitual residence of a trader who is a natural person shall be that person's principal place of business. 5. Where the contract is concluded in the course of the operations of a branch, agency or any other establishment of a trader, the place where the branch, agency or any other establishment is located shall be treated as the place of the trader's habitual residence. 6. For the purpose of determining whether a contract is a cross-border contract the relevant point in time is the time of the agreement on the use of the Common European Sales Law.Article 4 deleted Cross-border contracts
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. For the purposes of this Regulation, a contract between a trader and a consumer is a cross-border contract if: (a) either the address indicated by the consumer, the delivery address for goods or the billing address are located in a country oth the places of habitual residence of the trader thand the country of the trader's habitual residence; and (b) at least one of these countries is a Member Statensumer are in different countries.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5
The Common European Sales Law may be used for: (a) sales contracts; (b) contracts for the supply of digital content whether or not supplied on a tangible medium which can be stored, processed or accessed, and re-used by the user, irrespective of whether the digital content is supplied in exchange for the payment of a price. (c) related service contracts, irrespective of whether a separate price was agreed for the related service.Article 5 deleted Contracts for which the Common European Sales Law can be used
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6
Exclusion of mixed-purpose contracts and contracts linked to a consumer credit 1. The Common European Sales Law may not be used for mixed-purpose contracts including any elements other than the sale of goods, the supply of digital content and the provision of related services within the meaning of Article 5. 2. The Common European Sales Law may not be used for contracts between a trader and a consumer where the trader grants or promises to grant to the consumer credit in the form of a deferred payment, loan or other similar financial accommodation. The Common European Sales Law may be used for contracts between a trader and a consumer where goods, digital content or related services of the same kind are supplied on a continuing basis and the consumer pays for such goods, digital content or related services for the duration of the supply by means of instalments.Article 6 deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7
1. The Common European Sales Law may be used only if the seller of goods or the supplier of digital content is a trader. Where all the parties to a contract are traders, the Common European Sales Law may be used if at least one of those parties is a small or medium-sized enterprise (‘SME’). 2. For the purposes of this Regulation, an SME is a trader which (a) employs fewer than 250 persons; and (b) has an annual turnover not exceeding EUR 50 million or an annual balance sheet total not exceeding EUR 43 million, or, for an SME which has its habitual residence in a Member State whose currency is not the euro or in a third country, the equivalent amounts in the currency of that Member State or third country.Article 7 deleted Parties to the contract
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8
Agreement on the use of the Common 1. The use of the Common European Sales Law requires an agreement of the parties to that effect. The existence of such an agreement and its validity shall be determined on the basis of paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article and Article 9, as well as the relevant provisions in the Common European Sales Law. 2. In relations between a trader and a consumer the agreement on the use of the Common European Sales Law shall be valid only if the consumer's consent is given by an explicit statement which is separate from the statement indicating the agreement to conclude a contract. The trader shall provide the consumer with a confirmation of that agreement on a durable medium. 3. In relations between a trader and a consumer the Common European Sales Law may not be chosen partially, but only in its entirety.rticle 8 deleted European Sales Law
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. In case the requirements of Article 9(2) and (3) are not fulfilled, the consumer shall not be bound by the agreement on the use of the Common European Sales Law. Member States shall define the consequences on the law applicable and the validity of the concluded contract in such circumstances.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Agreements which go beyond the scope of the Common European Sales Law shall be invalid.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9
Standard Information Notice in contracts between a trader and a consumer 1. In addition to the pre-contractual information duties laid down in the Common European Sales Law, in relations between a trader and a consumer the trader shall draw the consumer's attention to the intended application of the Common European Sales Law before the agreement by providing the consumer with the information notice in Annex II in a prominent manner. Where the agreement to use the Common European Sales Law is concluded by telephone or by any other means that do not make it possible to provide the consumer with the information notice, or where the trader has failed to provide the information notice, the consumer shall not be bound by the agreement until the consumer has received the confirmation referred to in Article 8(2) accompanied by the information notice and has expressly consented subsequently to the use of the Common European Sales Law. 2. The information notice referred to in paragraph 1 shall, if given in electronic form, contain a hyperlink or, in all other circumstances, include the indication of a website through which the text of the Common European Sales Law can be obtained free of charge.Article 9 deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10
Member States shall lay down penalties for breaches by traders in relations with consumers of the requirements set out in Articles 8 and 9 and shall take all the measures necessary to ensure that those penalties are applied. The penalties thus provided shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Member States shall notify the relevant provisions to the Commission no later than [1 year after the date of application of this Regulation] and shall notify any subsequent changes as soon as possible.Article 10 deleted Penalties for breach of specific requirements
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11
Consequences of the use of the Common Where the parties have validly agreed to use the Common European Sales Law for a contract, only the Common European Sales Law shall govern the matters addressed in its rules. Provided that the contract was actually concluded, the Common European Sales Law shall also govern the compliance with and remedies for failure to comply with the pre- contractual information duties.Article 11 deleted European Sales Law
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12
Information requirements resulting from the Services Directive This Regulation is without prejudice to the information requirements laid down by national laws which transpose the provisions of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market and which complement the information requirements laid down in the Common European Sales Law.Article 12 deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13
A Member State may decide to make the Common European Sales Law available for: (a) contracts where the habitual residence of the traders or, in the case of a contract between a trader and a consumer, the habitual residence of the trader, the address indicated by the consumer, the delivery address for goods and the billing address, are located in that Member State; and/or (b) contracts where all the parties are traders but none of them is an SME within the meaning of Article 7(2).rticle 13 deleted Member States' options
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 30 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The keeping, use or consumption of a good, digital content or related services unsolicitedly supplied to a consumer shall not constitute acceptance. In such cases, the consumer shall be exempted from the obligation to provide any consideration and restitution shall not be mandatory.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 30 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. In relations between a trader and a consumer, a reply by the offeree which states or implies different contract terms is at all events a rejection and a new offer.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 52 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. For consumer transactions, notice of avoidance within a specified period is not necessary in order to avoid a contract on the basis of a mistake, fraud, threats or unfair exploitation.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 61 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
In relations between a trader and a consumer, in this instance the authoritative language version is the version in the consumer’s national language.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 69 – paragraph 1
1. Where the trader makes a statement before the contract is concluded, either to the other party or publicly, about the characteristics of what is to be supplied by that trader under the contract, the statement is incorporated as a term of the contract unless: (a) the other party was aware, or could be expected to have been aware when the contract was concluded that the statement was incorrect or could not otherwise be relied on as such a term; or (b) the other party’s decision to conclude the contract the trader shows that: (a) the statement had been corrected by the time of conclusion of the contract, (b) the decision to buy the goods could not have been influenced by the statement concerned.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 69 – paragraph 3
3. Where the other party is a consumer then, for the purposes of paragraph 1, a public statement made by or on behalf of a producer or other person in earlier links of the chain of transactions leading to the contract is regarded as being made by the trader unless the trader shows that, at the time of conclusion of the contract, he did not know and could not be expected to have known of it.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 69 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. In relations between a trader and a consumer, a contract term supplied by the trader is not binding if under the circumstances, in particular in view of the outward appearance of the contract and the unusual nature of the term, the consumer could not expect to encounter it, unless the trader has specifically drawn the consumer’s attention to that contract term.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 82
Where a trader supplies contract terms which have not been individually negotiated with the consumer within the meaning of Article 7, it has a duty to ensure that they are drafted and communicated in plain, clear and intelligible language. Where this is not the case, they are not binding for the consumer within the meaning of Article 79.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 83 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) whether the trader complied with the duty of transparency set out in Article 82;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point a a (new)
(aa) inappropriately exclude or limit the remedies available to the consumer against the trader or a third party for non- performance by the trader of obligations under the contract;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point a b (new)
(ab) permit a trader to keep money paid by the consumer if the latter decides not to conclude the contract, or perform obligations under it, without providing for the consumer to receive compensation of an equivalent amount from the trader in the reverse situation;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point a c (new)
(ac) restrict the evidence available to the consumer or impose on the consumer a burden of proof which legally lies with the trader;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point a d (new)
(ad) inappropriately exclude or limit the right to set-off claims that the consumer may have against the trader against what the consumer may owe to the trader;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point a e (new)
(ae) require a consumer who fails to perform obligations under the contract to pay a disproportionately high amount by way of damages or a stipulated payment for non-performance;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point a f (new)
(af) entitle a trader to withdraw from or terminate the contract within the meaning of Article 8 on a discretionary basis without giving the same right to the consumer, or entitle a trader to keep money paid for related services not yet supplied in the case where the trader withdraws from or terminates the contract;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point a g (new)
(ag) enable a trader to terminate a contract of indeterminate duration without reasonable notice, except where there are serious grounds for doing so;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point a h (new)
(ah) specific consumer behaviour is to be considered equivalent to the issue or non-issue of a statement unless the significance of the consumer's behaviour is specifically pointed out to him at the beginning of the period intended for this purpose and the consumer has an appropriate length of time to make an explicit statement;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point a i (new)
(ai) enable a trader to alter contract terms unilaterally without a valid reason which is specified in the contract;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point a j (new)
(aj) enable a trader to alter unilaterally without a valid reason any characteristics of the goods, digital content or related services to be provided or any other features of performance;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point a k (new)
(ak) stipulate that the price of the goods, digital content or related services is determined at the time of delivery or supply, or allow a trader to demand a higher price for his services than that which was fixed when the contract was concluded, unless the contract also allows for a price reduction if price change requirements have been agreed upon, the circumstances required for a price change are set out in the contract and are objectively justified and a price change cannot be brought about arbitrarily by the trader;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point i a (new)
(ia) oblige a consumer to perform all his obligations under the contract where the trader fails to perform its own;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point i b (new)
(ib) allow a trader to transfer its rights and obligations under the contract without the consumer’s consent, unless it is to a subsidiary controlled by the trader, or as a result of a merger or a similar lawful company transaction, and such transfer is not likely to negatively affect any right of the consumer;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point i c (new)
(ic) enable the trader to stipulate an unreasonably long or inadequately specified period during which he can accept or refuse a consumer's offer;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point i d (new)
(id) allow a trader to reserve an unreasonably long or inadequately specified period to perform the obligations under the contract;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point i e (new)
(ie) inappropriately exclude or limit the remedies available to the consumer against the trader or the defences available to the consumer against claims by the trader;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point i f (new)
(if) subject performance of obligations under the contract by the trader, or subject other beneficial effects of the contract for the consumer, to particular formalities that are not legally required and are unreasonable;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 84 – point i g (new)
(ig) impose an excessive burden on the consumer in order to terminate a contract of indeterminate duration;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point a
a) restrict the evidence available to the consumer or impose on the consumer a burden of proof which should legally lie with the trader;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point b
b) inappropriately exclude or limit the remedies available to the consumer against the trader or a third party for non- performance by the trader of obligations under the contract;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point c
c) inappropriately exclude or limit the right to set-off claims that the consumer may have against the trader against what the consumer may owe to the trader;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point d
d) permit a trader to keep money paid by the consumer if the latter decides not to conclude the contract, or perform obligations under it, without providing for the consumer to receive compensation of an equivalent amount from the trader in the reverse situation;eleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point e
(e) require a consumer who fails to perform obligations under the contract to pay a disproportionately high amount by way of damages or a stipulated payment for non-performance;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 366 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point f
(f) entitle a trader to withdraw from or terminate the contract within the meaning of Article 8 on a discretionary basis without giving the same right to the consumer, or entitle a trader to keep money paid for related services not yet supplied in the case where the trader withdraws from or terminates the contract;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point g
(g) enable a trader to terminate a contract of indeterminate duration without reasonable notice, except where there are serious grounds for doing so;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point h
(h) automatically extend a contract of fixed duration unless the consumer indicates otherwise, in cases where contract terms provide for an unreasonably early deadline for giving notice;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point i
(i) enable a trader to alter contract terms unilaterally without a valid reason which is specified in the contract; this does not affect contract terms under which a trader reserves the right to alter unilaterally the terms of a contract of indeterminate duration, provided that the trader is required to inform the consumer with reasonable notice, and that the consumer is free to terminate the contract at no cost to the consumer;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 370 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point j
(j) enable a trader to alter unilaterally without a valid reason any characteristics of the goods, digital content or related services to be provided or any other features of performance;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point k
(k) provide that the price of goods, digital content or related services is to be determined at the time of delivery or supply, or allow a trader to increase the price without giving the consumer the right to withdraw if the increased price is too high in relation to the price agreed at the conclusion of the contract; this does not affect price-indexation clauses, where lawful, provided that the method by which prices vary is explicitly described;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point l
(l) oblige a consumer to perform all their obligations under the contract where the trader fails to perform its own;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 373 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point m
(m) allow a trader to transfer its rights and obligations under the contract without the consumer’s consent, unless it is to a subsidiary controlled by the trader, or as a result of a merger or a similar lawful company transaction, and such transfer is not likely to negatively affect any right of the consumer;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point n
(n) allow a trader, where what has been ordered is unavailable, to supply an equivalent without having expressly informed the consumer of this possibility and of the fact that the trader must bear the cost of returning what the consumer has received under the contract if the consumer exercises a right to reject performance, and without the consumer having expressly required this;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point o
(o) allow a trader to reserve an unreasonably long or inadequately specified period to accept or refuse an offer;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point p
(p) allow a trader to reserve an unreasonably long or inadequately specified period to perform the obligations under the contract;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point q
(q) inappropriately exclude or limit the remedies available to the consumer against the trader or the defences available to the consumer against claims by the trader;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point r
(r) subject performance of obligations under the contract by the trader, or subject other beneficial effects of the contract for the consumer, to particular formalities that are not legally required and are unreasonable;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 85 – point v
(v) impose an excessive burden on the consumer in order to terminate a contract of indeterminate duration;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 100 – point a
(a) be fit for any particular purpose made known to the seller at the time of the conclusion of the contract, except where the circumstancesseller shows that the buyer did not rely, or that it was unreasonable for the buyer to rely, on the seller’s skill and judgementprovided corrected fitness-for-purpose information;
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 406 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 105 – paragraph 2
2. In a consumer sales contract or digital services contract, any lack of conformity which becomes apparent within six monthsone year of the time when risk passes to the buyer is presumed to have existed at that time unless this is incompatible with the nature of the goods or digital content or with the nature of the lack of conformity.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 113 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. In a consumer sales contract the entire performance may be withheld, unless such withholding is clearly disproportionate to the significance of the non-conformity.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 494 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 152 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. In the case of a consumer contract, the level of costs indicated for the related service shall be binding, unless explicitly stated otherwise. The binding figure indicated for such costs may not be exceeded.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 500 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 155 – paragraph 2
2. Without prejudice to paragraph 3, the customer's remedies are subject to a right of the service provider to cure whether or not the customer is a consumer.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 502 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 155 – paragraph 3
3. In the case of incorrect installation under a consumer sales contract as referred to in Article 101a contract for related services the consumer's remedies are not subject to a right of the service provider to cure.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 505 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 155 – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) in relation to the right of the service provider to cure, in contracts between a trader and a consumer, the reasonable period under Article 109 (5) must not exceed 30 days;deleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 506 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 155 – paragraph 5 – point b
(b) in relation to the remedying of a non- conforming performance Articles 111 and 112 do not apply; andeleted
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI
Amendment 524 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Article 179 – paragraph 1
1. The short period of prescription is twohree years.
2013/05/03
Committee: JURI