BETA

Activities of Evelyn REGNER related to 2013/0407(COD)

Legal basis opinions (0)

Amendments (3)

Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) Any compulsion used to compel the suspect or accused person to provide information should be limited. To determine whether the compulsion did not violate those rights, the following should be taken into account, in the light of all circumstances of the case: the nature and degree of compulsion to obtain the evidence, the weight of the public interest in the investigation and punishment of the offense at issue, the existence of any relevant safeguards in the procedure and the use to which any material so obtained is put. However, the degree of compulsion imposed on suspects or accused persons with a view to compelling them to provide information relating to charges against them should not destroy the very essence of their right not to incriminate one-self and their right to remain silent, even for reasons of security and public order.deleted
2014/03/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4
(4) Any evidence obtained in breach of this Article shall not be admissible, unless the use of such evidence would not prejudice the overall fairness of the proceedings.
2014/03/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4
(4) Any evidence obtained in breach of this Article shall not be admissible, unless the use of such evidence would not prejudice the overall fairness of the proceedings.
2014/03/25
Committee: JURI