9 Amendments of Karin KADENBACH related to 2017/0035(COD)
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The system established by Regulation (EC) No 182/2011 has, overall, proven to work well in practice and struck an appropriate institutional balance as regards the roles of the Commission and the other actors involved. That system should therefore continue to function unchanged except for certain targeted amendments concerning specific aspects of the advisory procedure and examination procedure, including the procedure at the level of the appeal committee. These amendments are intended to ensure wider political accountability and ownership of politically sensitive implementing acts without, however, modifying the legal and institutional responsibilities for implementing acts as organised by Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The Commission should have the possibility, in specific cases, to ask the two co-legislators, the European Parliament and Council, to indicate itstheir views and orientation on the wider implications of the absence of an opinion, including the institutional, legal, political and international implications. The Commission should take account of any position expressed by the European Parliament and the Council within 3 months after the referral. In duly justified cases, the Commission may indicate a shorter deadline in the referral.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Transparency on the votes of Member State representatives atthroughout the entire advisory and examination procedures, including the appeal committee level should be increased and. In particular, the individual Member State representatives' votes, including their voting intentions, in case no formal vote takes place, accompanied by clear justifications, should be made public.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) In order to guarantee full accountability of decisions taken throughout the comitology process, the appropriate level of transparency has to be ensured. This should include making the proposals, written comments submitted by Member States, all proposed amendments and detailed minutes of committee meetings public. Moreover, each standing committee should ensure balanced participation of stakeholders under observer status in its meetings.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a
3a. Where no opinion is delivered in the appeal committee, the Commission may refer the matter to the European Parliament and the Council for an opinion indicating its views and orientation on the wider implications of the absence of opinion, including the institutional, legal, political and international implications. The Commission shall take account of any position expressed by the European Parliament and the Council within 3 months after the referral. In duly justified cases, the Commission may indicate a shorter deadline in the referral.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 182/2011
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
(2a) in Article 9, paragraph 1 the following third subparagraph is added after subparagraph 2: “Each committee shall ensure balanced participation of stakeholders under the observer status in all meetings.”;
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point -a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point -a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) the voting results including, in the case of the appeal committee, the votes expressed by the representative of each Member State; and, in case no formal vote takes place, Member States’ voting intentions accompanied by clear justifications;
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011
Article 10 – paragraph 5
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. The references of aAll documents referred to in points (a) to (d), (f) and (g) of paragraph 1 as well as the information referred to in points (e) and (h) of that paragraph shall be made public in the register.