BETA

6 Amendments of Guido MILANA related to 2012/2009(DEC)

Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point a
(a) considers that transferable fishing concessions are the only possible solution to the problem of overcapacity, for which there is as yet no precise definition;deleted
2012/06/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) indicates other instruments of the common fisheries policy as possible ways of reducing fishing capacity and, purely by way of example, analyses transferable fishing concessions without identifying beneficial effects in them;
2012/06/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point c
(c) has ignored the fact that a multi- species fishing system, like that in the Mediterranean, cannot be founded on catch quotas.deleted
2012/06/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) denounces the inadequacy of the information supplied by Member States and the consequent difficulties in identifying policies which can reduce fishing over-capacity and in assessing the results of such policies.
2012/06/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 – point d a (new)
(da) collecting data, for which purpose it is desirable to increase the rate of EU cofinancing;
2012/06/04
Committee: PECH
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 – point d b (new)
(db) planning targeted scrapping per area.
2012/06/04
Committee: PECH