7 Amendments of Robert ROCHEFORT related to 2011/2024(INI)
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Urges the Commission to make it clear that a declaration for the purposes of temporary mobility should be valid throughout the territory of a Member State and that competent authorities of different regions of the same Member State should not be allowed to ask for separate declarations for the same professional;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to look into the possibility of further extending the scope for automatic recognition in future;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Points out the need to update the minimum training requirements for the purposes of automatic recognition so as to reflect current professional practice; urges the Commission to adopt a competence-based approach in this regard by defining minimum training requirements not only in terms of duration, but also in terms of learning outcomes; considers that professional bodies, competent authorities, as well as consumer and patient organizations should be actively involved in this process;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Is of the opinion that, for the revised directive to be future-proof, the Commission should propose a simple mechanism for regular update of the minimum training requirements;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission to encourage the cooperation between Member States and professional bodies in order to move towards a common practice in the area of continuous professional development;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Stresses that, in order to protect patients, practitioners providing e-Health services should ensure the same quality and safety standards as for the provision of non-electronic healthcare services; it should therefore be clarified that the requirements of this directive, and, if necessary, additional ones, should apply to e-Health service providers;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for the mandatory introduction of the IMI for competent authorities in order to facilitate proactive administrative cooperation and simplify recognition procedures; considers that the IMI could be further enhanced, for instance by expanding the functionalities available in order to facilitate the work of national authorities;