BETA

9 Amendments of Frédéric DAERDEN related to 2009/2111(DEC)

Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Draws attention to the Court of Auditors’ confirmation that the annual accounts for a budget of EUR 21 million fairly presents the Foundation’s actual financial position as of 31 December 2008 and that its operations and cash flows for that financial year are in accordance with the Foundation’s financial rules; notes the change of accounting officers and the problems found by the European Court of Auditors;
2010/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Draws attention to the Court of Auditors' confirmation that the annual accounts for a budget of EUR 21 million fairly presents the Foundation's actual financial position as of 31 December 2008 and that its operations and cash flows for that financial year are in accordance with the Foundation's financial rules; notes the change of accounting officers and the problems found by the European Court of Auditors;Does not apply to English version
2010/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Regrets that the Foundation’s Director and supervisory board did not solve the problems arising from the change of accounting officers in a timely manner; calls upon the Foundation’s management to take appropriate steps;deleted
2010/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Regrets thatCalls upon the Foundation’s Director and supervisory board did not solve the problems arising from the change of accounting officers in a timely manner; calls upon the Foundation’s management to take appropriate stepmanagement to take steps, as part of its human resources management policy, and in keeping with the its obligations concerning implementation of the budget, to make better provision in advance for the departure of key staff members;
2010/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the findings of the ECA that EUR 4.9 million (55%) of operational expenditure was carried forward without sufficient justification; calls therefore for programming and budget forecasts to be adjusted to reflect the actual annual needs;deleted
2010/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the findings of the ECA that EUR 4.9 million (55%) of operational expenditure was carried forward without sufficient justification; calls therefore forfor in-depth consideration to be given to ways of ensuring that the Foundation's specific needs in terms of multiannual contracts can be met in a manner consistent with programming and budget forecasts to be adjusted to reflect the actual annual needs;
2010/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Regrets that the ECA has once again discovered weaknesses in the procurement procedures; notes the shortcomings to which attention was drawn in the previous year; calls for a stronger commitment to the structures and processes required for proper procurement procedures;deleted
2010/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Regrets that the ECA has once again discoveredWelcomes the Foundation's readiness to correct the weaknesses in the procurement procedures; notes the shortcomings to which attention was drawn in the previous year; calls for anotes the stronger commitment to the structures and processes required for proper procurement procedures;
2010/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Foundation to enter staff numbers, including contract staff (87 persons), in the activity report in a transparent manner.deleted
2010/02/05
Committee: EMPL