6 Amendments of Derk Jan EPPINK related to 2010/2137(INI)
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
New title after paragraph 11
New title after paragraph 11
Review of State aid temporary rules adopted as a response to the crisis
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Urges the Commission to produce a study which demonstrates the impact of the State aid measures in the economy;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11 b. Calls upon the Commission to ensure a maximum of transparency and adhere strictly to the non-discrimination principle in approving State aid and prescribing divestment measures;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 c (new)
Paragraph 11 c (new)
11 c. Asks the Commission to produce study in which the ECB liquidity support is viewed as to its impact on the possible distortion of competition;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 d (new)
Paragraph 11 d (new)
11d. Calls upon the Commission to closely monitor the M3 money supply with regard to State aid that has been approved in order to prevent an unintended overcapitalisation of companies which would subsequently distort competition;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Notes the Court of Justice's recent decision not to extend legal professional privilege to the advice of in-house lawyers in EU antitrust investigations (Akzo Nobel v Commission (C-550/07)); recalls the important role that such can lawyers play in ensuring high standards of compliance and corporate governance within the EU; notes that such a role is optimised when full and frank legal advice can be given in confidence; calls on the Commission to consult stakeholders on the possible development of guidelines to clarify the conduct of antitrust investigations with respect to companies' in-house legal departments;