4 Amendments of Derk Jan EPPINK related to 2013/2018(BUD)
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes the proposed earmarking of resources to continue the implementation of multiannual projects, such as the completion of the new global security approach, the continuation of the buildings strategy (the Trebel, Vaclav Havel and KAD projects, renovation policy and stop- gap building), the provision of support for the multi-annual ICT strategy, and the continuation of the House of European History project;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. WelcomeRejects plans for the a "communication campaign", as there is no need to highlighting the major directions of Parliament's work in the current legislative term; considers that this campaign associated with the European elections as a part of the overall information and communication budget; requests is biased in that it favours some political parties over others; requests justifications and further details about the planned election-related expenditure;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Believes that in the current climate of austerity long-term investments such as Parliament's building projects need to be handled prudently; insists on strict cost management, project planning and supervision; requests that any further expansion is halted immediately, until such a time as economic circumstances allow for a review;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Takes note ofDeplores the fact that the openingconstruction of the European House of History is continuing, with its opening foreseen for 2015; appreciatstresses theat thorough information on the state-of-play of the project from the Secretary-General and the Bureau; reinforces its view that the final cost outturn must not exceed the figures set out in its business plan; expects an update on the possible co- financing agreement with the Commissionis project is not only highly controversial and costly, but also superfluous in light of the success of the visitor's centre; notes that pushing ahead with current plans will likely enforce negative public perceptions of Parliament, as it will be seen to be a costly and unnecessary vanity project in these times of financial difficulty; requests that all construction and associated works should be halted immediately, while the possibility of abandoning plans for a House of European History altogether is reconsidered by Parliament;