BETA

Activities of Oreste ROSSI related to 2011/0429(COD)

Shadow reports (1)

REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy PDF (280 KB) DOC (358 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ENVI
Dossiers: 2011/0429(COD)
Documents: PDF(280 KB) DOC(358 KB)

Amendments (16)

Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) Chemical pollution of surface water presents a threat to the aquatic environment with effects such as acute and chronic toxicity to aquatic organisms, accumulation in the ecosystem and loss of habitats and biodiversity, as well as a threat to human health. As a matter of priority, causes of pollution should be identified and emissions should, where possible, be dealt with at source, in the most economically and environmentally effective manner.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) Furthermore, in order to improve the information basis for future identification of priority substances, in particular as regards emerging pollutants, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the drawing up of a watch list. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, involving experts from the Member States, the industries concerned and NGOs which promote environmental protection.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 6
The watch list shall contain no more than 25 substances or groups of substances at any given time and shall indicate the monitoring matrix for each substance. The substances shall be selected, by means of a technical procedure, from among those for which the available scientifically relevant information indicates that they may pose a significant risk at Union level to or via the aquatic environment. In selecting the substances for the watch list the Commission shall take into account all available information including research projects, Member States' characterisation and monitoring programmes under Articles 5 and 8 of Directive 2000/60/EC and information on production volumes, use patterns, concentrations in the environment and effects, including that gathered in accordance with Directives 98/8/EC, 2001/82/EC and 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, and with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 and Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 6
Directive 2008/105/EC
Article 8 b – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 10 concerning the drawing up ofinclusion of substances in the watch list referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and their removal from it.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 6
Directive 2008/105/EC
Article 8 b – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 10 concerning the drawing upcompilation of the watch list referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 6
Directive 2008/105/EC
Article 8 b – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a
In exercising the power referred to in the previous subparagraph, the Commission shall establish a transparent technical procedure and the relevant criteria for the inclusion of substances in the watch list referred to in paragraph 1 of this article and their removal from it; it shall, in addition, take account of the recommendations referred to in Article 16(5) of Directive 2000/60/EC.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 6
Directive 2008/105/EC
Article 8 b – paragraph 3 – footnote
1 12 months after the adoptionentry into force of this Directive.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – footnote
1 12 months after the adoptionentry into force of this Directive.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – table – row 46
Directive 2000/60/EC
Annex X – table – row 46
(46) 57-63-6 200-342-2 17-alpha-ethinylestradiol deleted
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – table – row 47
Directive 2000/60/EC
Annex X – table – row 47
(47) 50-28-2 200-023-8 17-beta-estradiol deleted
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – table – rows 48
Directive 2000/60/EC
Annex X – table – row 48
(48) 15307-79-6 239-346-4 Diclofenac deleted
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – table – row 20
Directive 2008/105/EC
Annex I – table – row 20
(20) Lead and its 7439-92-1 17,2 1,3 14 7,2 not applicable not applicable 14 compounds Or. it Motivazione Reinstatement of the values currently in force.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – table – row 46
Directive 2008/105/EC
Annex I – table – row 46
(46) 17-alpha- 57-63-6 3,5 10-5 7 10-6 not not ethinylestradio applicable applicable l deleted
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – table – row 47
Directive 2008/105/EC
Annex I – table – row 47
(47) 17-beta- 50-28-2 4 10-4 8 10-5 not not estradiol applicable applicabl e deleted
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – table – row 48
Directive 2008/105/EC
Annex II – table – row 48
(48) Diclofenac 15307-79-6 0,1 0,01 not not applicable applicable deleted
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 10 a (new)
Directive 2008/105/EC
Annex I – part B – point 3
10a. In Annex I, point 3 of Part B is replaced by the following: ‘3. With the exception of cadmium, lead, mercury and nickel (hereinafter ‘metals’) the EQS set up in this Annex are expressed as total concentrations in the whole water sample. In the case of metals the EQS refers to the dissolved concentration, i.e. the dissolved phase of a water sample obtained by filtration through a 0,45 µm filter or any equivalent pre-treatment. Member States may, when assessing the monitoring results against the EQS, take into account: (a) natural background concentrations for metals and their compounds, if they prevent compliance with the EQS value; and (b) hardness, pH or other water quality parameters that affect the bioavailability of metals, the bioavailable concentrations being determined using appropriate bioavailability models.’.
2012/11/08
Committee: ENVI