5 Amendments of Crescenzio RIVELLINI related to 2010/2154(INI)
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Proposes, as the most suitable solution, – i.e. as the best compromise between the probability of an effective result and the risks to human health – active millimetre wave imaging systems using non-ionising radiation, which is not considered harmful if exposure remains below the limit values laid down in existing legislation;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that the technology based on backscatter x-ray scanning emits a low dose of X-rays. Clearly, any exposure to ionising radiation, however low, may have long-term effects on health due to the cumulative effect of radiation. It is therefore proposed that we avoid this technology, or at least ensure that all exposures are as low as possible for workers and passengers;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for, in respect of the use of X-ray body scanners (paragraph 3)backscatter X-ray technology, where its use cannot be avoided, special treatment to be given, especially to passengers who are sensitive to ionising radiation (e.g. pregnant women and children). Exemptions should also be granted to those with implanted medical devices (e.g. pacemakers and defibrillators);
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to periodically monitor the long-term effects of exposure to body scanners and, taking new scientific developments into account, and to check that the equipment has been correctly installed and is properly used and operated.
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Member States to provide passengers with relevant, comprehensive and clear information on all aspects of the use of body scanners for security applications.