3 Amendments of Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS related to 2009/0063(COD)
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
4. As the methods for funding or establishing and levying the amounts due for the coverage of security costs differ across the Community, the harmonisation of the basis for charging security costs at Community airports where the costs of security are reflected in the security charges is necessary. At these airports the charge should be related to the cost for providing security, taking into account any public financing of security costsunding of security costs, with a view to avoiding any profit and to providing suitable and cost-effective security services and facilities at the airports concerned.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)
(4a) When undertaking an investigation into the justification for the modification of the system or the level of security charges as set out in Article [...], the independent supervisory authority shall have access to the necessary information from the parties concerned and shall be required to consult the parties concerned in order to reach its decision. Without prejudice to Article [...], it shall issue a final decision as soon as possible, and in any case within four months of the matter being brought before it. This period may be extended by two months in exceptional and duly justified cases. The decisions of the independent supervisory authority shall have binding effect, without prejudice to parliamentary or judicial review, as applicable in the Member States.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new)
(2a) The Commission shall submit a report on the funding of aviation security, examining the evolution of aviation security costs and the methods for funding aviation security, no later than two years after entry into force of this Directive.