2 Amendments of Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS related to 2011/2013(INI)
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that EU-level harmonisation of contract law practices would be more efficient in ensuring convergence and a more level playing field, but that, given the challenges of harmonising national legal systemsthe legal systems not only of Member States but also of regions with legislative competences on this matter, an optional instrument is a more proportionate and feasible solution, at least as an interim measure;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to ensure close alignment of the proposed Consumer Rights Directive and the European Contract Law instrument so as to clarify the relationship between the two measures in such a way that in case of conflict the consumer rights legislation takes precedence, and a high level of consumer protection is ensured; for example the linguistic protection of citizens speaking any of the official languages in Member States.