22 Amendments of Vilja SAVISAAR-TOOMAST related to 2011/0398(COD)
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down rules on the introduction of noise-related operating restrictions in a consistent manner on an airport-by-airport basis and where the noise problem has been identified so as to help improve the noise climate and to limit or reduce the number of people significantly affected by the harmful effects ofaffected by aircraft noise, in accordance with the Balanced Approach.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) ‘Balanced Approach’ means the method defined in Volume 1, Part V of Annex 16 to the Chicago Convention under which the range of available measures, namely reduction of aircraft noise at source, land-use planning and management, noise abatement operational procedures and operating restrictions, is considered in a consistent way with the view to addressing the noise problem in the most cost-effective way on an airport by airport basis.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall designate competent authorities responsible for adopting measures on operating restrictions, as well as an independent appeal body in accordance with national laws and practices.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. The Member States shall notify the Commission of the names and addresses of the designated competent authorities and appeal body referred to in paragraph 1. The Commission shall publish this information.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall adopt aimplement the Balanced Approach in regard to aircraft noise management. To this en, on an airport-to- airport basis, within the scope of this Regulation. To this end, they shall asses the noise situation at an individual airport in accordance with Annex II of Directive 2002/49. Where the noise problem is identified, they shall:
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) evaluatecarry-out a formal and comprehensive assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of the available measures;
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) not as a first resort, operating restrictionsoperating restrictions only after consideration of the benefits to be gained from the other three principal elements of the Balanced Approach.
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. The competent authorities shall assess the noise situation at airports in their territory on a regular basis, in accordance with the requirementsmethod of Annex II of Directive 2002/49/EC and national or local rules. The competent authorities may call on the support of the Performance Review Body referred to in Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 691/2010.
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
At the request of the Commission and if the European Aviation Safety Agency does not already have the information requested, aircraft operators shall communicate the following noise information in respect of their aircraft that use Union airports:
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the noise performance certificate or certificates of the aircraft used, together with the associated actual maximum take- off weight;
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) any modification of the aircraft which influences its noise performance and is recorded in its noise certificate;
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Following the assessment carried out in accordance with Article 5, the notification of the decision shall be accompanied by a written report explaining the reasons for introducing the operating restriction, the environnoise abatemental objective established for the airport, the measures that were considered to meet that objective, and the evaluation of the likely cost-effectiveness of the various measures considered, including, where relevant, their cross- border impact.
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 1 – point 1.2
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 1 – point 1.2
1.2 A description of the environmental sustainabilitynoise abatement objectives for the airport and the national context. This will include a description of the aircraft noise objectives for the airport.
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.4
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.4
2.4 Forecast noise contours – including an assessment of the number of people likely to be affected by aircraft noise – distinguish between established residential areas and newly constructplanned residential areas.
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – heading 1
Annex 2 – heading 1
Assessment of the cost-effectiveness of noise-related operating restrictions mitigating measures in the context of the Balanced Approach
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Annex 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The cost-effectiveness of envisaged noise- related operating restriction mitigating measures will be assessed taking due account of following elements, to the extent possible, in quantifiable terms:
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Annex 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
4a. interdependencies between noise and emissions;
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 b (new)
Annex 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 b (new)
4b. Direct, indirect and catalytic employment and economic effects, including potential effects on regional economies.
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – paragraph 2
Annex 2 – paragraph 2