207 Amendments of Vilja SAVISAAR-TOOMAST
Amendment 2 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. Whereas public resources both at Member States and EU level have become scarcer and subject to increasing pressure, while the crisis and the ensuing recession, as well as the sovereign debt crisis in several Member States, have pushed Member States to finally implement the needed important and deep structural reforms to contribute to the restoration of price competitiveness and fiscal sustainability, leading to cuts in mainly growth-friendly expenditureeconomic growth and job creation, leading sometimes to cuts in co-financing of Structural and Cohesion Funds;
Amendment 9 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. Whereas evaluations performed during the 2007-2013 programme do not look at the whole evaluation cycle including efficiency, effectiveness and impact;
Amendment 10 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G b (new)
Recital G b (new)
Gb. Whereas the funds absorption rate is around 50% within Members States and around 30% in the last year of the period;
Amendment 11 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G c (new)
Recital G c (new)
Gc. Whereas SMEs are having difficulties with financing from the banking sector;
Amendment 14 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Takes the view that although the alignment with the Europe 2020 strategy is important, it is essential not to lose sight of the aims of economic, social and territorial cohesion, which were put at serious risk as a consequence of the crisis; calls for decisive action to maintain cohesion and for emphasis to be placed onstill many less developed regions need investments in infrastructurale projects in basic sectors such as transport, telecommunication and sustainable energy;
Amendment 25 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Insists on the role of the ESF in reducing the disparities in human capital among regions, and in the context of implementing the social dimension of the Europe 2020 Strategy, as this fund, in parallel with the ERDF, has beenshould contributing significantlye to the fulfilment of some of the current major priorities of the Union, namely boosting youth employment and the labour market, promoting sustainable economy and growth, reducing the number of early school leavers, and combating poverty, discrimination and social exclusion; Therefore insists in increasing the sound financial management principle, in particular efficiency and effectiveness of ESF operations.
Amendment 29 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls, however, that while there is strong evidence that implementation of cohesion policy has accelerated, and that the resulting programmes have made important contributions in many areas where investment is necessary for economic modernisation and competiveness (such as research and development, SME support, re- industrialisation, social inclusion, and education and training), a number of Member States risk not implementing their programmes untilbefore the end of the current programming period;
Amendment 30 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Encourages the Member States to explore synergies between cohesion policy financing and other sources of EU funding (such as for TEN-T, TEN-E, CEF, Horizon 2020, COSME and other programmes) as well as with financing provided by the European Investment Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development; urges the Member States to accelerate implementation and to simplify and improve access to the funds available in order to stimulate SMEs, local municipalities and other interested beneficiaries to make use of them;
Amendment 32 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Is concerned that, although it is clear that evaluation has an essential role to play in the policy debate and learnthe provision of monitoring data and information on implementation is improving, the lack of data – and the impossibiquality of targets set, and the uneven quality, in many instanccases, of aggregating it – makes it impossible to monitor in a proper manner progress made at regional and local level towards the establishedreporting of progress makes it difficult to develop a full picture of progress towards the targets, and considers it a priority to broaden and update regional statistics and improve the quality of datat regional and local level;
Amendment 34 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Asks the Commission and the Member States, in order to strengthen the transparency of reporting and the quality of programming and its implementation, to make full use of the monitoring and evaluation tools available in the context of the next legislative framework (stronger result orientation, use of common output indicators, choice of programme specific result indicators and a clear performance framework);
Amendment 35 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Commission, which is now launching the 2007-2013 ex-post evaluation, and the Member States to ensure that the evaluation is based on reliable data, look at efficiency, effectiveness and impact of operations and is completed by the 2015 deadline in order to draw clear lessons for the implementation of the next programming period mid-term evaluation.
Amendment 36 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Urges the Commission to work together with the Member States in increasing the transparency of the calls for projects and its predictability as well as reducing the timing between calls and awards of contracts in particular for SMEs, which compete in a fast changing environment.
Amendment 37 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 c (new)
Paragraph 13 c (new)
13c. Calls on Member States to develop policies in encouraging banks to co- finance EU projects
Amendment 38 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 d (new)
Paragraph 13 d (new)
13d. Urges the Commission to verify the Managing authorities if they apply the Late payments directive and deal with the unreasonable payments delays by those authorities.
Amendment 39 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 e (new)
Paragraph 13 e (new)
13e. Calls on the Commission to analyse the impact of ESF to unemployment and job creation as well as its effectiveness of operations.
Amendment 40 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 f (new)
Paragraph 13 f (new)
13f. Calls on the Internal Audit Service of the Commission and the European Court of Auditors to increase its performance audits on Cohesion and Structural Funds and in particular on ESF.
Amendment 41 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 g (new)
Paragraph 13 g (new)
13g. Urges the Commission to deeply analyse the causes of the low absorption rate.
Amendment 42 #
2013/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 h (new)
Paragraph 13 h (new)
13h. Calls on the Member States to ensure the co-financing rate in order to accelerate the implementation of funds.
Amendment 76 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) In order to minimise the administrative burden for ship owners and operators, in particular for small and medium sized enterprises, and to optimise the benefits-costs-ratio of the MRV system without jeopardising the objective to cover a widely predominant share of greenhouse gas emissions from maritime transport, the rules for MRV should only apply to large emitters. A threshold of 5000 gross tonnage (GT) has been selected after detailed objective analysis of sizes and emissions of ships going to and coming from Union ports. Ships above 5000 GT account for around 55% of the number of ships calling into Union ports and represent around 90% of the related emissions. This non-discriminatory threshold would ensure that that the most relevant emitters are covered. A lower threshold would result in higher administrative burden while a higher threshold would limit the coverage of emissions and thus the environmental effectiveness of the system. The rules applied by this Regulation should set a level playing field in the Union’s shipping sector and ensure the coherence with the existing international Law, in particular with MARPOL VI.
Amendment 98 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Other greenhouse gases, climate forcers or air pollutants should not be covered by the Union MRV system at this stage toThe Union MRV system is an opportunity to ensure coherent regulation of the shipping sector with regard to main air emissions. Thus the MRV will require the monitoring of CO2, SOx and NOx contained in MARPOL Annex VI. This is a necessary measure to ensure that the legislation enacted to reduce the growing adverse health effects from shipping air pollution is complied with, while avoiding requirements to install not sufficiently reliable and commercially available measurement equipment, which could impede the implementation of the Union MRV system.
Amendment 102 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – point l a (new)
Article 3 – point l a (new)
(la) 'ice class' means the notation assigned to the ship by the Administration or by an organisation recognised by the Administration showing that the ship has been designed for navigation in sea-ice conditions.
Amendment 107 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) In order to make use of the best available practices and scientific evidence, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of reviewing certain technical aspects of monitoring and reporting of CO2, SOx and NOx emissions from ships and of further specifying rules for the verification of emission reports and the accreditation of verifiers. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and Council.
Amendment 110 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) The objective of the proposed action, namely to monitor, report and verify CO2, SOx and NOx emissions from ships as first step of a staged approach to reduce these emissions cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States acting individually, due to the international nature of maritime transport and can therefore, by reason of scale and effects of the action, be better achieved at Union level. The Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
Amendment 113 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1
Article 1
This Regulation lays down rules for the accurate monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide (CO2)CO2, SOx and NOx emissions and other climate relevant information from ships arriving at, within or departing from ports under the jurisdiction of a Member State in order to promote the reduction of CO2 emissions from maritime transport in a cost effective manner.
Amendment 115 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the identification and type of the ship including the name of the ship, its International Maritime Organisation (IMO) registration number, its port of registry or home port, the ice class of the ship, and the name of the ship owner;
Amendment 116 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point h – subpoint iii a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point h – subpoint iii a (new)
iii a) the procedures, responsibilities, formulae and data sources for determining and recording the distance travelled and the time spent when navigating through ice;
Amendment 122 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – point a
Article 3 – point a
(a) ‘emissions’ means the release of CO2, SOx and NOx into the atmosphere by ships as provided for in Article 2;
Amendment 129 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – point k
Article 3 – point k
Amendment 130 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – point l a (new)
Article 3 – point l a (new)
(la) 'ice class' means the notation assigned to the ship by the Administration or by an organization recognized by the Administration showing that the ship has been designed for navigation in sea-ice conditions.
Amendment 134 #
Amendment 135 #
Amendment 141 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Derogating from the first paragraph, vessels exclusively operating within the scope of this Regulation and performing multiple voyages per day are exempted from the monitoring emissions on a per- voyage basis.
Amendment 150 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the identification and type of the ship including the name of the ship, its International Maritime Organisation (IMO) registration number, its port of registry or home port, the ice class of the ship, and the name of the ship owner;
Amendment 150 #
Amendment 154 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point h a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point h a (new)
(ha) the procedures, responsibilities, formulae and data sources for determining and recording the distance travelled and the time spent when navigating through ice;
Amendment 157 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point a – subpoint iii a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point a – subpoint iii a (new)
(iii a) the ice class of the ship,
Amendment 158 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. TIn order to reduce the administrative burden for companies the emission report referred to in Article 11 shall be submitted using automated systems and complete data exchange formats, including electronic templates.
Amendment 166 #
Amendment 172 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the identity of the ship (name, IMO registration number and, port of registry or home port and the ice class of the ship);
Amendment 176 #
Amendment 179 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3
Article 22 – paragraph 3
3. Where an international agreement on global measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from maritime transport is reached, the Commission shall review this Regulation and may, if appropriate, propose amendments to this Regulationto harmonise this Regulation with international rules.
Amendment 180 #
Amendment 190 #
Amendment 191 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – point c
Article 10 – point c
(c) aggregated CO2, SOx and NOx emissions from all voyages between ports under a Member State's jurisdiction;
Amendment 193 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – point d
Article 10 – point d
(d) aggregated CO2, SOx and NOx emissions from all voyages which departed from ports under a Member State's jurisdiction;
Amendment 195 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – point e
Article 10 – point e
(e) aggregated CO2, SOx and NOx emissions from all voyages to ports under a Member State's jurisdiction;
Amendment 197 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – point f
Article 10 – point f
(f) CO2, SOx and NOx emissions which occurred within ports under a Member State's jurisdiction at berth;
Amendment 203 #
Amendment 203 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part B – paragraph 3
Annex II – part B – paragraph 3
Average energy efficiency shall be monitored by using at least fourtwo indicators, fuel consumption per distance, the fuel consumption per transport work, the CO2 emissions per distance and the CO2 emissions per transport work and the CO2 emissions per distance, which shall be calculated as follows:
Amendment 204 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – part B – paragraph 5
Annex 2 – part B – paragraph 5
Amendment 205 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – part B – paragraph 7
Annex 2 – part B – paragraph 7
Amendment 212 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point a – point iii a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point a – point iii a (new)
(iiia) the ice class of the ship,
Amendment 235 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) annual CO2, SOx and NOx emissions;
Amendment 238 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point g
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) annual average fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions per distance travelled and mass of cargo carried on voyages falling within the scope of this Regulation;
Amendment 246 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – point 2
Article 26 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 525/2013
Article 21 a – paragraph 1
Article 21 a – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall report to the Commission by 15 January each year (”year X“) for the year X-2, the CO2, SOx and NOx emissions from maritime transport pursuant to Articles 9 and 10 of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/XXXX.
Amendment 247 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – point 2
Article 26 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 525/2013
Article 21 a – paragraph 2
Article 21 a – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with [Article 25 of this Regulation] to specify the requirements for the monitoring and reporting of CO2, SOx and NOx emissions from maritime transport pursuant to Articles 9 and 10 of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/XXXX and taking into account, where applicable, relevant decisions adopted by the bodies of the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol or agreements deriving from them or succeeding them or decisions adopted in the context of the International Maritime Organisation.
Amendment 248 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – point 2
Article 26 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 525/2013
Article 21 a – paragraph 3
Article 21 a – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts to set out the structure, format and process for the Member states' submission of CO2, SOx and NOx, emissions from maritime transport pursuant to Articles 9 and 10 of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/XXXX. These implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in [Article 26(2)].“
Amendment 268 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part B – point 4 – paragraph 1
Annex I – part B – point 4 – paragraph 1
The direct emissions measurements may be used for voyages within the scope of this regulation and for emissions occurring in ports located in a Member State's jurisdiction. CO2, SOx and NOx emitted shall include CO2, SOx and NOx emitted by main engines, auxiliary engines, boilers and inert gas generators. For ships on which reporting is based on this method, the fuel consumption shall be calculated using the measured CO2 emissions and the applicable emission factor of the relevant fuels.
Amendment 271 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part B – point 4 – paragraph 2
Annex I – part B – point 4 – paragraph 2
This method is based on the determination of CO2, SOx and NOx emission flows in exhaust gas stacks (funnels) by multiplying the CO2 concentration of the exhaust gas with the exhaust gas flow.
Amendment 275 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part B – paragraph 3
Annex II – part B – paragraph 3
Average energy efficiency shall be monitored by using at least fourtwo indicators, fuel consumption per distance, the fuel consumption per transport work, the CO2 emissions per distance and the CO2 emissions per transport workCO2, SOx and NOx emissions per distance, which shall be calculated as follows:
Amendment 276 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part B – paragraph 5
Annex II – part B – paragraph 5
Amendment 277 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part B – paragraph 6
Annex II – part B – paragraph 6
CO2, SOx and NOx emissions per distance = total annual CO2, SOx and NOx emissions / total distance travelled
Amendment 278 #
2013/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part B – paragraph 7
Annex II – part B – paragraph 7
Amendment 166 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) Musical instruments should as far as possible be accepted as baggage within the passenger cabin and, where this is not possible, should where possible be carried under the appropriate conditions in the cargo compartment of the aircraft. In order to allow the passengers concerned to assess whether their instrument can be stored in the cabin, air carriers should inform them about the size of storage facilities. Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 should be amended accordingly.
Amendment 174 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35 a (new)
Recital 35 a (new)
(35 a) Recital 24 of the base act is repealed.
Amendment 181 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
(-1) Article 1 paragraph 3 is deleted.
Amendment 189 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point d
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 2 – point l
Article 2 – point l
A flight where the aircraft took off but, for whatever reason, was subsequently forced to land at an airport other than the airport of destination or to return to the airport of departure, shall be considered a cancelled flight, except when ultimately the aircraft reaches its final destination or an airport in the neighbourhood of the final destination.
Amendment 308 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Amendment 317 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
Amendment 338 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 6 – paragraph 4
Article 6 – paragraph 4
An operating air carrier shall not be obliged to pay compensation in accordance with Article 7, if it can prove that the delay or change of schedule is caused by extraordinary circumstances and that the delay or change of schedule could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken. Such extraordinary circumstances can only be invoked insofar they affect the flight concerned or the previous flights operated by the same aircraft the same day.
Amendment 379 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(aa) EUR 250 for all journeys of 1 500 kilometres or less;
Amendment 381 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a b (new)
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
(a b) (b) EUR 300 for all journeys between 1 500 and 3 500 kilometres;
Amendment 383 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a c (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a c (new)
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
(a c) (c) EUR 600 for all journeys not falling under (a) or (b).
Amendment 407 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 8 – paragraph 5
Article 8 – paragraph 5
Where passengers choose the option referred to in paragraph 1(b), they shall, subject to availability, have the right to re- routing via another air carrier or another mode of transport where the operating air carrier cannot transport the passenger on its own services and in time to arrive at the final destination within 12 hours of the scheduled arrival time or within 24 hours of the scheduled arrival time if an earlier journey cannot be assured because of local restrictions or the frequency of the operating air carrier's service from that departure airport. Notwithstanding Article 22(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/200823, the other air carrier or other transport operator shall not charge the contracting carrier a price that goes beyond the average price paid by its own passengers for equivalent services in the last three months. __________________ 23 OJ L293, 31.10.2008, p.3
Amendment 410 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 8 – paragraph 6
Article 8 – paragraph 6
Amendment 424 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
Article 9 – paragraph 4
Article 9 – paragraph 4
If the operating air carrier can prove that the cancellation, delay or change of schedule is caused by extraordinary circumstances and that the cancellation, delay or change of schedule could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken, it may limit the total cost of accommodation provided according to paragraph 1(b) to EUR 10025 per night and per passenger and to a maximum ofup to 3 nights. If the operating air carrier chooses to apply this limitation, it shall nevertheless provide the passengers with information about available accommodation after the three nights, in addition to the continued obligations for information specified in Article 14.
Amendment 542 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 2027/97
Article 6d – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 6d – paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 556 #
2013/0072(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 2027/97
Article 6e – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 6e – paragraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 168 #
2013/0012(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 2 a (new)
Article 2 – point 2 a (new)
(2a) "Recharging station" is an installation comprising one or more recharging points.
Amendment 220 #
2013/0012(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure, that a minimum number of recharging points for electric vehicles are put into place, at least the number given in the table in Annex II,rough national targets set within the margins of the indicative numbers given in the table in Annex II, that recharging points for electric vehicles of categories M and N are put into place by 31 December 2020 at the latest.
Amendment 225 #
2013/0012(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. At least 10% of the recharging points shall be publicly accessibleMembers States shall ensure that a sufficient number of recharging points is put into place and made openly accessible with sufficient capacity to service at least 30% of the national electric vehicles fleet over the span of 24 hours.
Amendment 234 #
2013/0012(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 238 #
2013/0012(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 250 #
2013/0012(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 5
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. Shore-side electricity supply for maritime and inland waterway transport that will be deployed or renewed after 31 December 2015 shall comply with the technical specifications set out in Annex III.1.3 by 31 December 2015 at the latest.
Amendment 262 #
2013/0012(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 6
Article 4 – paragraph 6
6. All publicly accessible recharging points or stations for electric vehicles shall be equipped, when payment per kW used is required, with intelligent metering systems as defined in Article 2(28) of Directive 2012/27/EU and respect the requirements laid down in Article 9(2) of that Directive.
Amendment 351 #
2013/0012(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
The Commission report shall assess the requirements, targets and the dates set out in this Directive in respect to the infrastructure build-up and implementation of specifications, taking into account the technical, economic and market developments of the respective alternative fuels, accompanied if appropriate by a legislative proposal.
Amendment 352 #
2013/0012(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4 a (new)
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to review the number of publicly accessible recharging points laid out in Annex II of this Directive. The Commission shall base its delegated acts on the electric vehicle uptake as described in the reports submitted by the Member States to the Commission on the implementation of the national policy frameworks in accordance with Article 3 and Annex I and taking into account the electric vehicle uptake in accordance with Article 4 point 2a.
Amendment 368 #
2013/0012(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – title
Annex II – title
Amendment 2 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- Having regard to Title IV of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on free movement of persons
Amendment 3 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 b (new)
Citation 1 b (new)
- Having regard to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with disabilities
Amendment 43 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on carriers to make greater efforts to inform passengers more fully, particularly in case of cross-border travels; considers that information must be provided in time, in different formats, and be readily understandable, exact, accessible and complete, and that, as regards possible travel problems, passengers must be made aware of their rights at the outset, when they book a trip; therefore asks the Commission to recommend the national authority to draw up training courses for staff who provide the consumers with adequate and concrete information;
Amendment 61 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the Commission's new smartphone application, which provides information about passenger rights in several languages and in a format accessible to passengers with disabilities; calls on the Member States and carriers to press ahead with the development and use of similar modern technologies (including SMS and the use of social networks); furthermore invites the Commission to always take into consideration the condition of elderly people who are not always, when travelling, equipped with modern technology;
Amendment 67 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Recommends that adequately staffed info points and help desks, whose staff is sufficient and adequately trained to respond to persons with reduced mobility needs, be set up at places of departure and arrival (airports, railway stations, bus terminals designated in accordance with article 12 of Regulation 181/2011, and ports) and that both carriers and the operators of the above facilities provide more comprehensive assistance to passengers, including in the event of massive travel disruption; in small and unstaffed railway and bus stations, some alternative solutions, such as an information phone number or web-page, should be made available.
Amendment 88 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls for a European data bank to be set up to enable information to be exchanged on infringements of passenger rights and ways of dealing with them; calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States and the national enforcement bodies, to take the necessary steps; calls the Commission to install a system of sanctions in the event of clear infringements of European Law;
Amendment 90 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to enable the current law on price transparency and unfair commercial practices to be implemented and enforced effectively, in accordance with Directive 2011/83/EC, and to ensure that the headline price corresponds exactly to the final price and that no unreasonable extra costs (e.g. handling charges or a charge for payment by credit card) are added just before a purchase is made; non-optional operational costs are included in fares and that genuinely optional items are published and bookable with all necessary information in the format and channel used to publish the fare, notably in computerised reservation systems regulated by Regulation 80/2009/EC; calls the Commission to establish a system of infringement proceedings in the event of proven violations of European regulations on price transparency;
Amendment 102 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Calls the Commission to ensure that ticketing and transparent pricing would be available to everybody on non- discriminational bases independent to the location or nationality of the consumers or travel-agency. Asks the Commission to work out common rules to regulate over- booking and over-selling of tickets and compensation system in case of happening to protect the consumers;
Amendment 125 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to use its influence in order to provide joint complaint-handling machinery for the national enforcement bodies in the form of a central electronic clearing-house; believes that the clearing-house should advise passengers lodging complaints and, to save time and costs, refer them to the appropriate national enforcement body; recommends, as regards the information and advice to be obtained through the clearing-house, that a standard e-mail address be adopted and an inexpensive EU- wide hotline set up; recommends, as regards the rules about how cases should be distributed among National Enforcement Bodies, that the Commission consults transport operators.
Amendment 131 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission to produce a standard EU-wide complaint form, to be drafted with in cooperation with representative organisations of stakeholders concerned translated into all EU languages and used for all modes, which should be givenavailable to passengers when they make a reservation and when relevant; believes that a fixed maximum time limit for submitting and handling complaints should be laid down for all modes;
Amendment 154 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Points to the need, as far as all modes are concerned, for a clearer definition of the term ‘extraordinary circumstances’, as this would enable carriers and national enforcement authorities to apply the rules more consistently and ensure that citizens could be informed to more useful effect about their rights; calls on the Commission to draw up the necessary legislative proposals involving transport stakeholders; Notes that technical failure should not be considered as an extraordinary circumstance and that falls to the liability of a carrier;
Amendment 163 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls onUrges the Commission to consider what action to take shoulddraw up a legislative proposal obliging airlines gto bankruptprotect passengers against airline insolvency, and draws attention in this connection to its resolution of 25 November 2009;
Amendment 173 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Welcomes the Commission's intention to revise Regulation 261/2004. Invites the Commission to assess also the impact of the Sturgeon ruling in its impact assessment study of the legislative proposal.
Amendment 189 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on carriers, together with industry, to devise comprehensible standard notification procedures and, if possible, set up coordinated notification systems, so as to make travel easier for people with disabilities or reduced mobility and enable them to easily communicate their assistance needs in advance;
Amendment 200 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Maintains that the transport infrastructure must be such as to enable people with disabilities or reduced mobility to have access without discrimination to all means of transport and at all stages of travel, from being able to book a ticket, access the platform, get in the vehicles to being able to lodge a complaint if needed; as regards the cases in which unaccompanied people with disabilities are denied boarding on account of safety regulations, draws attention to the judgment handed down by a French court in January 2012;
Amendment 212 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Maintains that carriers must improve the quality of assistance to people with disabilities or reduced mobility and train their staff to be more aware of and capable of responding to the needs of people in those categories;
Amendment 219 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23 a. Urges carriers to take into account the needs of people with disabilities or reduced mobility in the development of any new service, notably of new means of payment such as smartphones and smart cards;
Amendment 234 #
2012/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Urges the Commission to continue its efforts to develop a European multimodal travel planner, and calls on the Member States, together with the Commission, to remove the obstacles to access to those public traffic data and data transfer allowing the establishment of a European multi-modal travel planning, while ensuring a consistent data protection;
Amendment 119 #
2012/0184(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 8
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 8
Amendment 128 #
2012/0184(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – indent 3
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – indent 3
– vehicles used by agricultural, horticultural, forestry, farming or fishery undertakings with a maximum design speed not exceeding 40 km/hhich are not used to provide transport services,
Amendment 255 #
2012/0184(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
The testing centre or, if relevant, the competent authority of the Member State that has carried out a roadworthiness test on a vehicle registered in its territory shall issue a proof to each vehicle having successfully passed such a test. The proof shall indicate the date of the next roadworthiness test. No proof of roadworthiness need be issued if it is possible to indicate in the vehicle registration document that the roadworthiness test has been conducted and the date of the next such test.
Amendment 256 #
2012/0184(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Each Member State shall recognise the proof issued in accordance with paragraph 1. or a corresponding record in the vehicle registration document.
Amendment 285 #
2012/0184(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall examine the feasibility, costs and benefits of the establishment of an electronic vehicle information platform with a view to exchange information on data related to roadworthiness testing between the competent authorities of Member States responsible for testing, registration and vehicle approval, the testing centres and the vehicle manufacturers. In addition, the Commission shall investigate the possibility of combining the Member States’ existing electronic databases and supranational databases which exist within the European Union or of operational data exchanges among them, and shall promote exchanges of best practice between Member States.
Amendment 35 #
2011/2096(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that shipping industry has an important role in connecting the eastern and western parts and central and peripheral regions of the EU, calls to ensure that while following the initiatives on reduction of the emissions (greenhouse gases, sulphur etc) the backward modal shift is avoided;
Amendment 315 #
2011/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 1 a (new)
Paragraph 16 – indent 1 a (new)
- initiatives to ensure that reduction of sulphur emissions from ships does not result in backward modal shift;
Amendment 1 #
2011/2044(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas, however, Parliament receives numerous complaints from citizens who are frequently faced with cumbersome formalities, related in particular to the re- registration of their vehicles in another Member State, and whereas at the same time the Union and Member States need to guarantee that the re-registration of stolen vehicles with falsified registration certificates is avoided;
Amendment 5 #
2011/2044(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Supports the Commission’s efforts to simplify the cross-border transferability of cars, and invites Member States to fully implement the principles of EU law on the registration of cars in other Member States; recalls in this regard that cars (right-hand drive vehicles included) compliant with the relevant EU type-approval should be eligible for registration in Member States; and calls the Commission to increase the security of harmonised registration certificates to minimize the risk of re- registration of stolen vehicles with falsified registration certificates;
Amendment 9 #
2011/2044(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to put forward a legislative proposal on the roadworthiness testing of motor vehicles, with a view to reducing the administrative burden for citizens and industry while guaranteeing a high level of road safety and to introduce a uniformed verifiability of valid roadworthiness test;
Amendment 19 #
2011/0409(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) This Regulation should also further reduce noise limits. It should take account of Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning type-approval requirements for the general safety of motor vehicles, their trailers and systems, components and separate technical units intended therefor, which introduced new stricter noise requirements for motor vehicle tyres and which underlined the need for a coherent and comprehensive approach to address the problem of road noise, including taking into account the significant contribution of road surfaces to road noise. Studies highlighting the annoyance and health effects from road traffic noise, and the associated costs and benefits should also be heeded.
Amendment 33 #
2011/0409(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) ‘vehicle type’ means: (2.1) for vehicles, tested according to Annex II, paragraph 4.1.2.1 a set of vehicles as defined in Annex II Part B to Directive 2007/46/EC. (2.2) for vehicles, tested according to Annex II, paragraph 4.1.2.2 a set of vehicles which do not essentially differ in such respects as: (2.2.1) the shape or materials of the bodywork (particularly the engine compartment and its soundproofing); (2.2.2) the type of engine (e.g. positive or compression ignition, two- or four-stroke, reciprocating or rotary piston), number and capacity of cylinders, type of injection system, arrangement of valves, rated engine speed (S), or the type of electric motor. (2.2.3) vehicles having the same type of engine and/or different overall gear ratios, may be regarded as vehicles of the same type. However, if the above differences provide for a different test method, these differences are to be considered as a change of type.
Amendment 39 #
2011/0409(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
The sound level measured in accordance with the provisions of Annex II and mathematically rounded to the nearest integer value shall not exceed the limits set out in Annex III.
Amendment 46 #
2011/0409(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Vehicles shall be deemed to fulfil the requirements of Annex X, if the vehicle manufacturer provides technical documents to the type-approval authority showing that the difference between maximum and minimum engine speed of the vehicles at BB’, for any test condition inside the ASEP control range defined in point 3.3. of Annex VIII, with respect to conditions set out in Annex II, does not exceed 0,15 x S. Vehicles of category N1 are exempted from ASEP if one of the following conditions is fulfilled: (a) The engine capacity is not exceeding 660 ccm and the power-to-mass ratio PMR calculated by using the maximum authorised vehicle mass is not exceeding 35; (b) The payload is at least 850 kg and the power-to-mass ratio PMR calculated by using the maximum authorised vehicle mass is not exceeding 40;
Amendment 50 #
2011/0409(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 a (new)
Article 8 a (new)
Article 8 a Road Noise Grading Within 24 months of the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall bring forward a proposal for the grading and classification of EU roads according to noise generation. To this end, the Commission shall establish a harmonised method to measure road noise level, based on the work of ISO and CEN.
Amendment 55 #
2011/0409(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – point 5.2.2 a (new)
Annex 1 – point 5.2.2 a (new)
5.2.2 a. The limits values set forth in the table in Annex III apply with an additional margin of 1 dB(A).
Amendment 58 #
2011/0409(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – point 3.2.1 – introductory part
Annex 2 – point 3.2.1 – introductory part
3.2.1. The vehicle tested shall be selected in a way so that that all vehicles of the same type which are put on the market fulfil the requirements of this Regulationrepresentative of vehicles brought to market as specified by the manufacturer. Measurements shall be made without any trailer, except in the case of non-separable vehicles. Measurements shall be made on vehicles at the test mass mt specified according to the following table:
Amendment 59 #
2011/0409(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – point 3.2.2
Annex 2 – point 3.2.2
3.2.2. Tyre rolling sound emissions are laid down in Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 on the general safety of motor vehicles. The tyres to be used for the test shall be representative for the vehicle and shall be selected by the vehicle manufacturer and recorded in Appendix 3 to Annex I of this Regulation. They shall correspond to one of the tyre sizes designated for the vehicle as original equipment. The tyre is or will be commercially available on the market at the same time as the vehicle. 2/ The tyres shall be inflated to the pressure recommended by the vehicle manufacturer for the test mass of the vehicle. The tyres shall have at least legal tread depth. 2/ Given that the tyre contribution for overall sound emission is significant, regard must be had for existing regulatory provisions concerning tyre/road sound emissions. Traction tyres, snow tyres and special-use tyres shall be excluded during type-approval- and conformity of production measurements at the request of the manufacturer in accordance with UNECE regulation No. 117 (OJ L 231, 29.8.2008, p.19)the latest amendments for ECE R117.
Amendment 62 #
2011/0409(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – point 4.1.2.1.4.1
Annex 2 – point 4.1.2.1.4.1
4.1.2.1.4.1. Vehicles with manual transmissions, automatic transmissions, adaptive transmissions or CVTs tested with locked gear ratios The following conditions for selection of gear ratios are possible: (a) If one specific gear ratio gives an acceleration in a tolerance band of ± 5 % of the reference acceleration awot ref, not exceeding 32,0 m/s2, test with that gear ratio. (b) If none of the gear ratios give the required acceleration, then choose a gear ratio i, with an acceleration higher and a gear ratio i + 1, with an acceleration lower than the reference acceleration. If the acceleration value in gear ratio i does not exceed 32,0 m/s2, use both gear ratios for the test. The weighting ratio in relation to the reference acceleration awot ref is calculated by: k = (a wot ref - a wot (i+1)) / (a wot (i) - a wot (i+1)) (c) if the acceleration value of gear ratio i exceeds 32.0 m/s2, the first gear ratio shall be used that gives an acceleration below 32.0 m/s2 unless gear ratio i + 1 provides acceleration less than aurban. In this case, two gears, i and i + 1 shall be used, including the gear i with acceleration exceeding 32.0 m/s2. In other cases, no other gear shall be used. The achieved acceleration awot test during the test shall be used for the calculation of the part power factor kP instead of awot ref. (d) If the vehicle has a transmission in which there is only one selection for the gear ratio the acceleration test is carried out in this vehicle gear selection. The achieved acceleration is then used for the calculation of the part power factor kP instead of awot ref. (e) If rated engine speed is exceeded in a gear (e) If rated engine speed is exceeded in a gear ratio before the vehicle passes BB' the next higher gear shall be used.
Amendment 63 #
2011/0409(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Annex 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The sound level measured in accordance with the provisions of Annex II, mathematically rounded to the nearest integer value shall not exceed the following limits:
Amendment 70 #
2011/0409(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 3 – Limit Values Table
Annex 3 – Limit Values Table
Vehicle Description of vehicle category Limit values expressed in dB(A) [decibels (A)] cCategory Limit values for Limit values for Limit values for registration, sale Type-approval of Type-approval of and entry into of new vehicles of new vehicle service of new types types vehicles Phase 1 valid from Phase 2 valid from Phase 3 valid from from from [2[1 years after [5 [6 years after [7 [8 years after publication] publication] publication] Off- Off- Off- General General General road * road * road * M Vehicles used for the carriage of passengers M1 no of seats <≤ 9; ≤ 125 kW/ton 72 74*** 70 73*** 70 73*** no of seats ≤ 9; 125kW/ton < M1 73 70 75*** 71 74*** 68 71 6974*** 68 69**power to mass ratio ≤ 150kW/ton no of seats <≤ 9; M1 75 71 71 6974 69 69 74 69 power to mass ratio > 150 kW/ton M2 no of seats > 9; mass < 2.5 tons M2 72 72 70 70 70 7 70 M2 72 70 no of seats > 9; 2.5 tons < mass < 3.5 tons 74 75 72 70 73 702 703 no of seats > 9; 23.5 tons < mass < 3.5 tons; M2 76 73 77 745 716 72 74 715 72rated engine power < 150 kW no of seats > 9; 3.5 tons < mass < 5 tons; M2 77 74 78 75 76 72 737 724 736 rated engine power <> 150 kW no of seats > 9; 3.5 tons < mass <> 5 tons; M2 rated engine M3 76 77 78 745 76 74 765 rated engine power >≤ 150 80kW no of seats > 9; mass > 5 tons; 180 kW < M3 79 75 80 76 738 79 74 736 747 rated engine power < 1≤ 250 kW no of seats > 9; mass > 5 tons; rated engine M3 80 77 81 79 759 7780 757 778 rated engine power > 1250 kW N Vehicles used for the carriage of goods N1 mass <≤ 2.5 tons N1 72 74 70 72 71 70 7 72 N1 69 2.5 tons < mass ≤ 3.5 tons 69 69 69 74 275 72 73 72 73 3.5 tons < mass < 3.512 tons; N1 2 725 76 734 705 712 70 73 71rated engine power < 75 kW 3.5 tons < mass < 12 tons; N2 77 74 78 75 725 76 73 72 73 74 75 < rated engine power < 75150 kW 3.5 tons < mass < 12 tons; N2 78 75 79 76 73 74 78 735 747 75 < rated engine power <> 150 kW N3 3.5 tons < mass <> 12 tons; N2 79 80 778 79 75 77 75 78 77 rated engine power >≤ 150 kW80kW mass > 12 tons; N3 81 77 82 78 7580 7681 75 79 7680 75 180 < rated engine power < 1≤ 250 kW mass > 12 tons; N3 82 80 823 78 81 802 780 80 81 rated engine power > 1250 kW * Increased limit values shall only be valid if the vehicle complies with the relevant definition for off-road vehicles set out in point 4 of Section A of Annex II to EU Directive 2007/46/EC. ** For M1 vehicles the increased limit values for off-road vehicles are only valid valid if the maximum authorised mass > 2 tonnes. *** For M1 vehicles if the vehicle complies with the relevant definition for off- road vehicles according to article A.4 of Annex II of EU Directive 2007/46/EC.
Amendment 72 #
2011/0409(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 6 – point 3 – paragraph 2
Annex 6 – point 3 – paragraph 2
One vehicle has to be chosen and subjected to the tests set out in point 2. If the test results fulfil the COPlimit requirements of Annex X of Directive 2007/46/ECwith an additional tolerance of 1dB, the vehicle shall be considered to be in compliance with the COP provisions.
Amendment 82 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down rules on the introduction of noise-related operating restrictions in a consistent manner on an airport-by-airport basis and where the noise problem has been identified so as to help improve the noise climate and to limit or reduce the number of people significantly affected by the harmful effects ofaffected by aircraft noise, in accordance with the Balanced Approach.
Amendment 101 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) ‘Balanced Approach’ means the method defined in Volume 1, Part V of Annex 16 to the Chicago Convention under which the range of available measures, namely reduction of aircraft noise at source, land-use planning and management, noise abatement operational procedures and operating restrictions, is considered in a consistent way with the view to addressing the noise problem in the most cost-effective way on an airport by airport basis.
Amendment 116 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall designate competent authorities responsible for adopting measures on operating restrictions, as well as an independent appeal body in accordance with national laws and practices.
Amendment 123 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. The Member States shall notify the Commission of the names and addresses of the designated competent authorities and appeal body referred to in paragraph 1. The Commission shall publish this information.
Amendment 129 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall adopt aimplement the Balanced Approach in regard to aircraft noise management. To this en, on an airport-to- airport basis, within the scope of this Regulation. To this end, they shall asses the noise situation at an individual airport in accordance with Annex II of Directive 2002/49. Where the noise problem is identified, they shall:
Amendment 131 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Amendment 139 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) evaluatecarry-out a formal and comprehensive assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of the available measures;
Amendment 167 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) not as a first resort, operating restrictionsoperating restrictions only after consideration of the benefits to be gained from the other three principal elements of the Balanced Approach.
Amendment 188 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. The competent authorities shall assess the noise situation at airports in their territory on a regular basis, in accordance with the requirementsmethod of Annex II of Directive 2002/49/EC and national or local rules. The competent authorities may call on the support of the Performance Review Body referred to in Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 691/2010.
Amendment 217 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
At the request of the Commission and if the European Aviation Safety Agency does not already have the information requested, aircraft operators shall communicate the following noise information in respect of their aircraft that use Union airports:
Amendment 222 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the noise performance certificate or certificates of the aircraft used, together with the associated actual maximum take- off weight;
Amendment 227 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) any modification of the aircraft which influences its noise performance and is recorded in its noise certificate;
Amendment 231 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Amendment 235 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 247 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Following the assessment carried out in accordance with Article 5, the notification of the decision shall be accompanied by a written report explaining the reasons for introducing the operating restriction, the environnoise abatemental objective established for the airport, the measures that were considered to meet that objective, and the evaluation of the likely cost-effectiveness of the various measures considered, including, where relevant, their cross- border impact.
Amendment 285 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 1 – point 1.2
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 1 – point 1.2
1.2 A description of the environmental sustainabilitynoise abatement objectives for the airport and the national context. This will include a description of the aircraft noise objectives for the airport.
Amendment 292 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.4
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.4
2.4 Forecast noise contours – including an assessment of the number of people likely to be affected by aircraft noise – distinguish between established residential areas and newly constructplanned residential areas.
Amendment 299 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – heading 1
Annex 2 – heading 1
Assessment of the cost-effectiveness of noise-related operating restrictions mitigating measures in the context of the Balanced Approach
Amendment 304 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Annex 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The cost-effectiveness of envisaged noise- related operating restriction mitigating measures will be assessed taking due account of following elements, to the extent possible, in quantifiable terms:
Amendment 310 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Annex 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
4a. interdependencies between noise and emissions;
Amendment 312 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 b (new)
Annex 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 b (new)
4b. Direct, indirect and catalytic employment and economic effects, including potential effects on regional economies.
Amendment 316 #
2011/0398(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 – paragraph 2
Annex 2 – paragraph 2
Amendment 131 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
The managing body of the airport shall provide, at the users request, the secretariat of the Airport Users' Committee.
Amendment 223 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 230 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. Where, following the selection procedure laid down in Articles 7 to 10, a supplier of groundhandling services mentioned in paragraph 1 loses its authorisation to provide these services, Member States mayshall require supplier(s) of groundhandling services which subsequently provide these services to grant staff previously hired to provide these services the rights to which they would have been entitled if there had been a transfer within the meaning of Council Directive 2001/23/EC.
Amendment 232 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 5
Article 12 – paragraph 5
5. Where a Member State imposes a requirement as referred to in paragraph (2), tTender documents for the selection procedure laid down in Articles 7 to 10 shall list the staff concerned and give the relevant details of employees' contractual rights and the conditions under which employees are deemed to be linked to the services in question.
Amendment 262 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. At airports whose annual traffic has been not less than 2 million passenger movements or 50 000 tonnes of freight for at least three consecutive years, nNo undertaking shall be permitted to provide groundhandling services whether as a supplier of groundhandling services, a sub-contractor or as a self-handling user unless it has been granted the appropriate approval. An undertaking meeting the requirements of this Chapter shall be entitled to receive an approval.
Amendment 324 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 5
Article 27 – paragraph 5
5. Where the Airport Users' Committee disagrees with the decision of the managing body of the airport to centralise, or not to centralise, an infrastructure or with the scope of centralisation, it may ask the independent supervisory authority of the Member State concerned to decide whether the infrastructure concerned is to be centralised or not and to what extenexamine the justifications of the decision taken by the managing body of the airport.
Amendment 329 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 8
Article 27 – paragraph 8
8. If a decisionisagreement on the scope of the centralised infrastructure is brought before the independent supervisory authority in line with paragraph (5) of this Article, the procedure laid down in Article 6 and Article 11 of Directive 2009/12/EC shall apply.
Amendment 406 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. The managing body of the airport shall be in charge of the proper coordination of groundhandling activities at its airport. As ground coordinator, the managing body of the airport shall in particular ensure that the operations of suppliers of groundhandling services and self-handling airport users comply with the airport rules of conduct as defined in Article 31. The airport operator shall be empowered to enforce the rules of conduct. The adopted measures shall be transparent, proportionate and non-discriminatory.
Amendment 418 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 30 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the managing body of the airport shall ensure that the operations of suppliers of groundhandling services and self- handling airport users arshall be coordinated with the airport managing body through a proper contingency plan and where possible through an airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) and through a proper contingency plan.
Amendment 486 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2
Article 34 – paragraph 2
2. Every employee involved in the provision of groundhandling services shall attend at least twofive days of training relevant for the tasks assigned to the employee. Every employee shall attend the relevant training when taking up a new job or when a new task is assigned to the employee.
Amendment 504 #
2011/0397(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4
Article 35 – paragraph 4
Amendment 74 #
2011/0391(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) To allow air carriers to adapt to imperative situations of urgency, such as a marked decline in traffic or an economic crisis that severely affects the activity of air carriers, affecting a lager part of the scheduling period, the Commission should be allowed to adopt urgent measures to ensure the consistency of measures to be taken at coordinated airports. These measures will allow air carriers to retain priority in allocating the same series for the following scheduling period even if the 850% rate has not been met.
Amendment 98 #
2011/0391(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
13) ‘series of slots’ shall mean at least 15 slots for a summer scheduling period and 10 slots for a winter scheduling periodhaving been requested for the same time on the same day of the week for consecutive weeks and allocated by the coordinator on that basis or, if that is not possible, allocated at approximately the same time;
Amendment 209 #
2011/0391(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the coordinator that the series of slots in question has been operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by that air carrier for at least 850 % of the time during the scheduling period for which it has been allocated.
Amendment 224 #
2011/0391(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
If the 850 % usage of the series of slots cannot be demonstrated, the priority provided under paragraph (2) shall not be given, unless the non-utilisation can be justified on the basis of any of the following reasons:
Amendment 296 #
2011/0391(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if the 850 % usage rate as defined in Article 10(2) cannot be achieved by an air carrier, the coordinator may decide to withdraw from that air carrier the series of slots in question for the remainder of the scheduling period and place them in the pool after having consulted the air carrier concerned.
Amendment 301 #
2011/0391(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if after an allotted time corresponding to 1520 % of the period of the series validity no slots of that series of slots have been used, the coordinator shall place the series of slots in question in the pool for the remainder of the scheduling period, after having consulted the air carrier concerned. The coordinator may decide to withdraw the series of slots before the end of a period corresponding to 1520 % of the period of validity of the series if the carrier does not show that it intends to use them.
Amendment 125 #
2011/0302(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The Commission has committed to mainstream climate change into Union spending programmes and to direct at least 20% of the Union budget to climate-related objectives. It is important to ensure that climate change mitigation and adaptation as well as risk prevention and management are promoted in the preparation, design and implementation of projects of common interest. Infrastructure investments covered by this Regulation should contribute to promoting the transition to a low-carbon and climate- and disaster-resilient economy and society. The Commission should ensure that international agreements and standards applicable within the internal market are applied even-handedly to the Member States, without causing distortions of competition, in order to ensure the success of European undertakings in the face of global competition.
Amendment 209 #
2011/0302(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
Recital 40
(40) With respect to the conditions for the financial instruments, it might be necessary to add additional requirements in the Work Programmes, for example to ensure a competitive and fair internal markets in view of the development of the Union's policies, technological developments and other factors that may become relevant.
Amendment 210 #
2011/0302(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
Recital 41
(41) Multi-annual programming for support from the Facility should be directed towards supporting the Union's priorities by ensuring the availability of the necessary financial resources and the consistency, fairness and continuity of joint action by the Union and the Member States. For proposals submitted following the implementation of the first multiannual work programme in the sector of transport, eligibility of cost should start on 1 January 2014 to ensure the continuity of projects already covered by Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 laying down general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of the trans-European transport and energy networks.
Amendment 266 #
2011/0302(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by developing modern and high performing trans-European networks which take account of future traffic flows, thus bringing forward benefits for the entire European Union in terms of competitiveness and economic, social and territorial cohesion within the Single Market and creating an environment more conducive to private and public investment through a combination of financial instruments and Union direct support and by exploiting synergies across the sectors. The achievement of this objective will be measured by the volume of public and private investment in projects of common interest, and in particular the volume of public and private investments in projects of common interest realised through the financial instruments under this Regulation.
Amendment 306 #
2011/0302(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii a (new)
(iii a) preparing for future transport flows.
Amendment 321 #
2011/0302(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) contributing to sustainable development and protection of the environment, notably by fostering the integration of energy from renewable sources into the transmission network and developing carbon dioxide networks and investing in sustainable transport, to be measured by the transmission of renewable energy from generation to major consumption centres and storage sites, and the sum of CO2 emissions prevented by the construction of the projects which benefited from the Connecting Europe Facility.
Amendment 422 #
2011/0302(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i
(i) rail and inland waterways and motorways of the sea: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 230% of the eligible cost; the funding rate may be increased to 340% for actions addressing bottlenecks; the funding rate may be increased to 450% for actions concerning cross-border sections;
Amendment 464 #
2011/0302(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii
(ii) traffic management systems, including the implementation of the land-based and on-board components of RIS, VTMIS and SESAR, freight transport services, secure parkings on the road core network, as well as actions to support the development of Motorways of the Seas: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 230% of the eligible cost.
Amendment 81 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The planning, development and operation of trans-European transport networks contribute to the attainment of major Union objectives, such as the full implementation and smooth functioning of the Sinternal mgle European Market and the strengthening of economic and soc, social and territorial cohesion and also have the specific objectives of allowing the seamless and sustainable mobility of persons and goods among Member States and ensuring appropriate accessibility and connectivity for all regions of the Union and contributing to further economic growth and competitiveness in a global perspective.
Amendment 218 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
(r a) 'isolated network' means the rail network of a Member State, or a part thereof, with a track gauge which is different to that of the European standard nominal track gauge (1435mm), for which certain major infrastructure investments cannot be justified in economic cost-benefit terms by virtue of the specificities of that network arising from its geographic detachment or peripheral location;
Amendment 243 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) provide appropriate accessibility of all regions of the UnionCohesion through: (i) contributing to accessibility and connectivity of all regions of the Union, including outermost regions, insular, peripheral as well as mountainous ones, thereby promoting social, economic and territorial cohesion and, supporting inclusive growth, and reducing transport infrastructure disparities among various parts of the Union.
Amendment 369 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 –point c – subpoint 1
Article 13 – paragraph 3 –point c – subpoint 1
(1) nominal track gauge for new railway lines: 1 435 mm, except for isolated networks;
Amendment 600 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part
(a) for railway transport infrastructure, except for isolated networks:
Amendment 172 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) Article 174 of the Treaty provides that, in order to strengthen its economic, social and territorial cohesion, the Union shall aim at reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions or islands, particular. Among the regions concerned particular attention shall be paid to rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition, and regions which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps such as the northernmost regions with very low population density and island, cross- border and mountain regions. Article 175 of the Treaty requires that the Union would support the achievement of these objectives by action it takes through the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guidance Section, the European Social Fund, the European Regional Development Fund, the European Investment Bank and other instruments.
Amendment 296 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
Recital 55
(55) Objective criteria should be fixed for designating eligible regions and areas for support from the Funds. To this end, the identification of the regions and areas at Union level should be based on the common system of classification of the regions established by Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and the Council of 26 May 2003 on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) Special attention should be paid to regions which suffer from serious and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as regions with very low population density and island, cross- border and mountain regions, taking into account the fact that these territorial characteristics do not necessarily correspond to the breakdown currently proposed by the NUTS classification.
Amendment 1234 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
For Member States which acceded to the Union before 2013, whose GDP per capita is below 75% of the EU 27 average, and whose average real GDP growth 2008- 2010 was lower than the EU 27 average, the cohesion policy allocation shall not be lower than in the period 2007-2013.
Amendment 1633 #
2011/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 111 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c – indent 1 (new)
Part 3 – article 111 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c – indent 1 (new)
- In such areas, the ceiling of co- financing rates set in Article 110.3 may be increased by 10% up to a maximum ceiling of 80%.
Amendment 40 #
2011/0190(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The revised Annex VI to MARPOL introduces, inter alia, stricter sulphur limits for marine fuel in SECAs (1.00% as of 1 July 2010 and 0.10% as of 1 January 2015) as well as in sea areas outside SECAs (3.5% as of 1 January 2012 and, in principle, 0.50% as of 1 January 2020). Most Member States are obliged to require ships to use fuel with maximum 1.00% sulphur content in SECAs as of 1 July 2010 based on their international commitments. In order to ensure coherence with international law as well as to secure proper enforcement of new globally established sulphur standards in the Union, the provisions of Directive 1999/32/EC should be aligned with the revised Annex VI to MARPOL. In order to ensure a minimum quality of fuel used by ships either for fuel- or technology-based compliance, marine fuel the sulphur content of which exceeds the general standard of 3.5 % by mass should not be allowed for use or placing on the market in the Union.
Amendment 45 #
2011/0190(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 a (new)
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) In view of the health benefits of lower sulphur emissions, the Commission should consider extending the 0.10% limit to other seas bordering on Member States’ land mass or extending that limit so as to cover a fixed distance from the EU coastline, and should draw up a firm timetable for its enforcement.
Amendment 46 #
2011/0190(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 b (new)
Recital 6 b (new)
(6b) In order to ensure a minimum quality of fuel used by ships for either fuel- or technology-based compliance, marine fuel the sulphur content of which exceeds the general standard of 3.5% by mass should not be allowed for use or placing on the market in the Union. That limit should apply only to fuel to be used to power ships and not to fuel being transported by ship.
Amendment 63 #
2011/0190(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) Enforcement of the 0.10% limit in the years immediately following 2015 should take account of uncertainty about the availability of low-sulphur fuel and differing views on the effectiveness and reliability of emission abatement methods. In particular the Commission and Member States should refrain from acting against firms which are making genuine efforts to comply with the rules. Member States should ensure, in accordance with Regulation 18 of MARPOL Annex VI, that the availability of fuel with a sulphur content conforming to the standards is guaranteed equally in terms of regions and to any persons wishing to use it.
Amendment 84 #
2011/0190(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 a (new)
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) The use of liquefied natural gas (LNG) virtually eliminates sulphur emissions. New rules for ships powered by liquefied natural gas are expected to enter into force in 2014 along with the revised International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). Member States should pay particular attention to the need to ensure the safety and availability of LNG-powered ships while preventing the revised SOLAS Convention from creating needless obstacles to the use of that fuel.
Amendment 141 #
2011/0190(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6 – point e
Article 1 – point 6 – point e
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 4 a – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 4 a – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that marine fuels are not used in their territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones falling outside SOx Emission Control Areas by passenger ships operating on regular servicessailing to or from any Union port if the sulphur content of those fuels by mass exceeds:
Amendment 148 #
2011/0190(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6 – point e
Article 1 – point 6 – point e
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 4 a – paragraph 4 – point d
Article 4 a – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) 0.10 % as from 1 January 202015.
Amendment 3 #
2010/2158(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph A
Paragraph A
A. recalling that a lack of access to transport is often one factor in multiple deprivatvital for all European regions areand cities and underlining the important impact transport can have on regional development and prosperity, especially for remote areas
Amendment 19 #
2010/2158(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Strongly supports the use and promodevelopment and implementation of integrated urban mobility plans (urban travel plans) and encourages the optimisation of different modes of transport by improving urban planning;
Amendment 28 #
2010/2158(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the importance of accessible public transport not only for deprived neighbourhoods but also for urban and suburban areas, conurbation and adjacent rural areas in order to answer the urban sprawl and calls on the Commission and Member States to promote the exchange of best practice in this area;
Amendment 37 #
2010/2158(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the vital importance of transport infrastructure to the regions and cities of Europe and calls on the Commission to provide innovative financing solutions for its development; through pilot projects and development of networks like the SmartCities project.;
Amendment 51 #
2010/2158(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 8 #
2009/2230(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses that it is important to enhance the Baltic Sea region’s transport capacity towards the east, in particular in order to speed up freight transit at the border between the European Union and the Russian Federation;
Amendment 75 #
2009/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Stresses the necessity to promote paper-free port and customs operations as well as to ease up cooperation between different service providers and consumers at the port, using different intelligent transport systems and networks such as SafeSeaNet and e-Custom, in order to speed up port operations and to reduce pollution;
Amendment 43 #
2008/0062(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 a (new)
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Since the data relating to the identification of an offender is personal, Member States must take the measures necessary to ensure that Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data2 is complied with. The owner, the holder of the vehicle or the otherwise identified person suspected of committing the road safety related traffic offence should be informed accordingly, when notified of the offence, of his or her rights regarding access to, rectification of and deletion of data and of the maximum legal period for which the data can be kept. 2 OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31.
Amendment 44 #
2008/0062(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 b (new)
Recital 12 b (new)
(12b) Apart from the temporary nature of their storage, data collected under this Directive should not, under any circumstances, be used for purposes beyond what is required in order to follow up on road safety offences. The Commission and the Member States should accordingly ensure that the processing of personal data and the management of the software applications used will serve to prevent any data collected from being used for purposes other than those specifically related to road safety.
Amendment 52 #
2008/0062(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the exchange of information is carried out by interoperable electronic means and towithout exchange of data involving other databases. Member States shall ensure that this exchange of information is conducted in a cost efficient and secure manner guaranteeing the confidentiality of the data transmitted, as far as possible using existing software applications such as the one especially designed for the purposes of Article 12 of Decision 2008/615/JHA, and amended versions of that software.
Amendment 57 #
2008/0062(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The owner, the holder of the vehicle or the otherwise identified person suspected of committing the road safety related traffic offence shall be notified by means of the information letter that his or her personal data shall be treated in accordance with the provisions of Directive 95/46/EC and shall point out his or her rights as regards access, correction and deletion, as referred to in Article 7 of this Directive.
Amendment 63 #
2008/0062(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
The provisions on data protection set out in the Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters9 shall apply to personal data processed under this DirectiveDirective 95/46/EC shall apply to personal data processed under this Directive. The competent authorities of the other Member States shall not store the information sent by the Member State of the offence. That information shall be sent and used solely for the purposes of this Directive, and, upon conclusion of proceedings, all data must be verifiably deleted. The Member State of registration shall record only the date and the competent authority of the Member State of the offence to whom the information was sent.
Amendment 65 #
2008/0062(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Any person concerned shall have the right to obtain information on which personal data recorded in the State of registration were transmitted to the requesting Member State, including the date of the request and the competent authority of the Member State of the offence. Any person concerned shall have the right to obtain information on which data is recorded in the Member State of the offence.
Amendment 70 #
2008/0062(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex 1 – page 2 – section 1 a (new)
Annex 1 – page 2 – section 1 a (new)
Amendment 71 #
2008/0062(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex 1 – last page
Annex 1 – last page
Amendment 72 #
2008/0062(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex 1 a (new)
Annex 1 a (new)