6 Amendments of Spyros DANELLIS related to 2011/2150(INI)
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the evolution of passenger screening methods is leading to wider use of methods such as security scanners and behavioural profiling, new questions are raised regarding passenger protection that concern privacy, non-discrimination and public health.
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Underlines that even passengers who are aware of their rights may be deterred from seeking redress by laborious complaints procedures; considers that there is a need for EBs to have the resources required to maintain a visible presence in the Union’s larger airports, to offer basic information and mediation services;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective implementation and enforcement of the existing legislation on price transparency and unfair commercial practices, and to require that the advertised price is a fair reflection of the final price; Or. l>en
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on the Commission to examine the passenger protection issues related to new screening methods, such as security scanners, hand searches and passenger profiling; considers that existing passenger rights provisions and enforcement bodies could play a role in redressing the problems that may arise.
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to incorporate the European Court of Justice’s interpretations of various definitions and terms, in particular the notion of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ and rules for compensation, in any upcoming revision of the Regulation;propose a clear set of definitions and terms in any upcoming revision of the Regulation, as to reduce the scope that exists for challenges to compensation rules and for variation in national enforcement; any such review must uphold the level of passenger protection provided by European Court of Justice rulings and incorporate the Court’s interpretation of ‘extraordinary circumstances’.
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Believes that passengers whose luggage has been lost or delayed should enjoy equivalent rights, in terms of compensation and assistance, to passengers who have been delayed themselves;Considers that legislative or awareness-raising promotional action is required at European level with the aim of increasing public awareness of the rights and complaints procedures related to lost and delayed luggage.