Activities of Spyros DANELLIS related to 2012/2005(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
Implementation of the Single European Sky legislation (short presentation)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on the Implementation of the Single European Sky Legislation PDF (200 KB) DOC (115 KB)
Amendments (10)
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that maintaining the appropriateEurope's consistently high levels of safety and operational conditions is becoming more and more of a challenge;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Recalls that national performance targets register the commitment of Member States to achieving the objectives of the SES and therefore considers it of utmost importance that the Commission demands the revision of any national plan that does not contribute adequately to the fulfilment of EU-wide targets;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Regrets that despite its considerable social and environmental benefits, the SES project is not sufficiently known or understood by the public and invites the Commission, Member States and stakeholders to increase their efforts at public communication;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Acknowledges the critical role of the human factor in delivering SES, especially with regards to safety, and asks for a continued emphasis on open reporting procedures and on the training of ATC staff;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Stresses that the creation of FABs must not be understood as a stand-alone requirement, but as a means towards fulfilling the objectives of defragmenting Europe's airspace and improving performance;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Emphasises that in order to adequately fulfil their role in the Single European Sky, National Supervisory Authorities must be functionally separate from ANSPs and must exercise their powers impartially, independently and transparently;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Understands that, without the SESAR technology, the full benefits of implementation ofing the SES would not be possiblerealised and therefore urges the industry to take the deployment phase of this project seriously;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Acknowledges that the business case for investment in SESAR technologies is stronger in larger and more congested hubs than in smaller regional airports or airports serving seasonal routes; maintains however that the performance of the overall network would be improved by a wider spread of SESAR capabilities, aided by public funding;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Supports the public private partnership (PPP) approach as this isit can be a win-win situation for all, working together with incentives and commitmenthen structured and executed appropriately and effectively;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Asks that the SESAR Joint Undertaking body continues its role well into the futurepreparations for a legislative proposal on the future role of the SESAR Joint Undertaking are completed in good time, as it plays a vital part to the success of the SES;