BETA

Activities of Francesco Enrico SPERONI related to 2012/0011(COD)

Legal basis opinions (0)

Amendments (19)

Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) the data subject has freely and consciously given consent to the processing of their personal data for one or more specific purposes;
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Where the collection and processing of the personal data is purely for commercial purposes, the data subject must be paid a fee for agreeing that the processing be performed. The data subject may not renounce his right to receive that fee.
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 b (new)
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 86 with a view to establishing the amount, nature and arrangements for payment of the fee to data subjects who agree to their personal data being processed for commercial purposes.
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) the purposes of the processing for which the personal data are intended, including the contract terms and general conditions where the processing is based on point (b) of Article 6(1) and the legitimate interests pursued by the controller where the processing is based on point (f) of Article 6(1); and, where the processing is purely for commercial purposes, the amount, nature and arrangements for payment of the fee to data subjects who agree to their personal data being processed;
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. Where personal data are processed for direct marketing purposes, the data subject shall have the right to object free of charge to the processing of their personal data for such marketing. This right shall be explicitly offered to the data subject in an intelligible manner and shall be clearly distinguishable from other information.
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point a
a) a controller established in a third country where the Commission has decided that the third country ensures an adequate level of protection in accordance with Article 41; ordeleted
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point b
b) an enterprise employing fewer than 250 persons; ordeleted
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point d
d) a controller offering only occasionally goods or services to data subjects residing in the Union.eleted
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4
4. The obligations referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply to the following controllers and processors: a) a natural person processing personal data without a commercial interest; or b) an enterprise or an organisation employing fewer than 250 persons that is processing personal data only as an activity ancillary to its main activities.deleted
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) the processing is carried out by an enterprise employing 250 persons or more;
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
aa) respect for consumer rights;
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to any other administrative or judicial remedy, every data subject shall have the right to lodge, free of any charge, a complaint with a supervisory authority in any Member State if they consider that the processing of personal data relating to them does not comply with this Regulation.
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 74 – paragraph 1
1. Each natural or legal person shall have the right to file, free of any charge, for a judicial remedy against decisions of a supervisory authority concerning them.
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 75 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to any available administrative remedy, including the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority as referred to in Article 73, every natural person shall have the right to file, free of any charge, for a judicial remedy if they consider that their rights under this Regulation have been infringed as a result of the processing of their personal data in non-compliance with this Regulation.
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 79 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) an enterprise or an organisation employing fewer than 250 persons is processing personal data only as an activity ancillary to its main activities.deleted
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 414 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 79 – paragraph 4 – introductory wording
4. The supervisory authority shall impose a fine up to 2500 000 EUR, or in case of an enterprise up to 0,51 % of its annual worldwide turnover, to anyone who, intentionally or negligently:
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 416 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 79 – paragraph 5 – introductory wording
5. The supervisory authority shall impose a fine up to 51 000 000 EUR, or, in case of an enterprise up to 12 % of its annual worldwide turnover, to anyone who, intentionally or negligently:
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 421 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 79 – paragraph 6 – introductory wording
6. The supervisory authority shall impose a fine up to 1 0500 000 EUR or, in case of an enterprise up to 23 % of its annual worldwide turnover, to anyone who, intentionally or negligently:
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 424 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 79 – paragraph 6 – point a a (new)
aa) uses for commercial purposes personal data which have been collected for non-commercial purposes;
2012/11/29
Committee: JURI