Progress: Procedure rejected
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC before Amsterdam E 100A, RoP 163
Legal Basis:
EC before Amsterdam E 100A, RoP 163Subjects
Events
The rapporteur, Mr ROTHLEY, supported the draft text of the Directive, stating that it provided adequate guarantees and would fill the current legal vacuum. However, in spite of the rapporteur’s position, most of the political groups rejected the joint text, pointing out that the proposed legal framework did not provide adequate protection of the fundamental values of the individual. Commissioner Monti confirmed the commitment made at the meeting of the Conciliation Committee on the ‘farmer’s privilege’ and warned that rejection of the text by the EP would prevent the establishment of guarantees for respect for human dignity and the introduction of the farmer’s privilege. He also felt that the joint text was a good compromise as the ban on patenting elements of the human body as such and the modification of genetic identity was included not only in the recitals but also in Article 2 of the joint text. In his view, rejection of the text would leave the EU lagging behind Japan and the United States in the area of biotechnological research. His position was not supported.
In relation to the common position of 7 February 1994, the joint text incorporated the amendments proposed by the EP at second reading, with the exception of the amendment concerning Recital 10 (patentability of parts of the human
Body). The Conciliation Committee reached agreement on a new wording of this key recital: ‘…an invention based on elements that were susceptible of industrial
application and produced from the human body by means of a technical process in such a way that they are no longer directly linked to a specific individual shall not be excluded from patentability due to the human origin of the elements, even where the structure of those elements is identical to those of a natural element, on the understanding that the parts of the human body from which those elements are derived shall be excluded from patentability’. In other words, parts of the human body were not patentable in principle, but they could be patentable when they formed part of an industrial invention and had been modified in such a way as to no longer be directly linked to an individual. However, problems of interpretation could arise in relation to the phrase ‘in such a way that they are no longer directly linked to a specific individual’. After noting that there was disagreement, it was decided that the Council and the EP would each make a statement on their interpretation of this phrase. The EP also pointed out that where there were different interpretations of legislative texts, it would be up to the Court of Justice to take a decision. The other main aspects of the Parliament/Council compromise related to: - modification of the genetic identity of animals. Provision was made to exclude from patentability ‘ processes for modifying the genetic identity of animals which are likely to cause them suffering or physical handicaps without any substantial benefit to man or animal, and also animals resulting from such processes, insofar as the suffering or physical handicaps inflicted on the animals concerned are out of proportion to the objective pursued’; - germ gene therapy. The EP, the Council and the Commission agreed on a joint statement that referred to the recent opinion of the Group of Advisers on the Ethical Implications of Biotechnology to the European
Commission. In this opinion, the Group had stated that ‘having regard to the importance and the controversial nature of germ gene therapy and in light of the scientific knowledge available, human gene therapy is not currently acceptable from an ethical point of view’. - farmers’ rights. On this issue the Commission made the following statement: ‘When a Community legal provision on the breeding of animals enables farmers to use protected livestock for reproduction purposes on his farm in order to renew his stock, the Commission shall give due consideration to this for the purposes of incorporating such a derogation within the framework of the Directive’.
Second meeting of the Conciliation Committee. There was a majority position in the EP delegation, although it was not unanimous, on Mr Rothley’s proposal. The Council would respond at the next meeting of the Conciliation Committee due to be held on 23 January 1995.
Documents
- Text adopted by Parliament, 3rd reading: OJ C 068 20.03.1995, p. 0015-0026
- Text adopted by Parliament, 3rd reading: T4-0078/1995
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 3rd reading: T4-0078/1995
- Report tabled for plenary by Parliament delegation to Conciliation Committee, 3rd reading: A4-0028/1995
- Report tabled for plenary by Parliament delegation to Conciliation Committee, 3rd reading: OJ C 068 20.03.1995, p. 0013
- Report tabled for plenary, 3rd reading: A4-0028/1995
- Joint text approved by Conciliation Committee co-chairs: 3606/1995
- Joint text approved by Conciliation Committee co-chairs: 3606/1995
- Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading: EUR-Lex
- Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading: COM(1994)0245
- Text adopted by Parliament, 2nd reading: OJ C 205 25.07.1994, p. 0230-0307
- Text adopted by Parliament, 2nd reading: T3-0411/1994
- Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading: T3-0411/1994
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading: OJ C 205 25.07.1994, p. 0008
- Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading: A3-0321/1994
- Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading: A3-0321/1994
- Commission communication on Council's position: EUR-Lex
- Commission communication on Council's position: SEC(1994)0275
- Council position: 04065/1/1994
- Council position: OJ C 101 09.04.1994, p. 0065
- Council position published: 04065/1/1994
- Text adopted by Parliament confirming position adopted at 1st reading: OJ C 342 20.12.1993, p. 0015-0030
- Text adopted by Parliament confirming position adopted at 1st reading: T3-0681/1993
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T3-0681/1993
- Committee final report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: OJ C 342 20.12.1993, p. 0002
- Committee final report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A3-0364/1993
- Committee report tabled for plenary confirming Parliament's position: A3-0364/1993
- Reconsultation: EUR-Lex
- Reconsultation: COM(1993)0570
- Modified legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Modified legislative proposal: OJ C 044 16.02.1993, p. 0036
- Modified legislative proposal: COM(1992)0589
- Modified legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Modified legislative proposal published: COM(1992)0589
- Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: OJ C 305 23.11.1992, p. 0107-0173
- Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T3-0596/1992
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T3-0596/1992
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: OJ C 305 23.11.1992, p. 0007
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A3-0286/1992
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A3-0286/1992
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Text adopted by Parliament, partial vote at 1st reading/single reading: OJ C 125 18.05.1992, p. 0112-0183
- Text adopted by Parliament, partial vote at 1st reading/single reading: T3-0223/1992
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T3-0223/1992
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: OJ C 125 18.05.1992, p. 0008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A3-0126/1992
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A3-0126/1992
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: EUR-Lex
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: COM(1988)0496
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: OJ C 067 16.03.1992, p. 0007
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A3-0050/1992
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A3-0050/1992
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0550/1989
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: OJ C 159 26.06.1989, p. 0010
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: OJ C 010 13.01.1989, p. 0003
- Legislative proposal: COM(1988)0496
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex OJ C 010 13.01.1989, p. 0003 COM(1988)0496
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0550/1989 OJ C 159 26.06.1989, p. 0010
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: OJ C 067 16.03.1992, p. 0007 A3-0050/1992
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: OJ C 125 18.05.1992, p. 0008 A3-0126/1992
- Text adopted by Parliament, partial vote at 1st reading/single reading: OJ C 125 18.05.1992, p. 0112-0183 T3-0223/1992
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: OJ C 305 23.11.1992, p. 0007 A3-0286/1992
- Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: OJ C 305 23.11.1992, p. 0107-0173 T3-0596/1992
- Modified legislative proposal: EUR-Lex OJ C 044 16.02.1993, p. 0036 COM(1992)0589
- Reconsultation: EUR-Lex COM(1993)0570
- Committee final report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: OJ C 342 20.12.1993, p. 0002 A3-0364/1993
- Text adopted by Parliament confirming position adopted at 1st reading: OJ C 342 20.12.1993, p. 0015-0030 T3-0681/1993
- Council position: 04065/1/1994 OJ C 101 09.04.1994, p. 0065
- Commission communication on Council's position: EUR-Lex SEC(1994)0275
- Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading: OJ C 205 25.07.1994, p. 0008 A3-0321/1994
- Text adopted by Parliament, 2nd reading: OJ C 205 25.07.1994, p. 0230-0307 T3-0411/1994
- Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading: EUR-Lex COM(1994)0245
- Joint text approved by Conciliation Committee co-chairs: 3606/1995
- Report tabled for plenary by Parliament delegation to Conciliation Committee, 3rd reading: A4-0028/1995 OJ C 068 20.03.1995, p. 0013
- Text adopted by Parliament, 3rd reading: OJ C 068 20.03.1995, p. 0015-0026 T4-0078/1995
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1992:125:SOM:EN:HTMLNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1992:125:TOC |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1992:125:SOM:EN:HTMLNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1992:125:TOC |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1992:305:SOM:EN:HTMLNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1992:305:TOC |
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1992:305:SOM:EN:HTMLNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1992:305:TOC |
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1993:342:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1993:342:SOM:EN:HTML |
docs/11 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1994:205:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1994:205:SOM:EN:HTML |
docs/15 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/19 |
|
docs/22 |
|
events/2/date |
Old
1992-01-21T00:00:00New
1992-01-20T00:00:00 |
events/7/date |
Old
1992-02-20T00:00:00New
1992-02-19T00:00:00 |
events/13/date |
Old
1992-09-23T00:00:00New
1992-09-22T00:00:00 |
events/16/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
events/16/date |
Old
1993-11-23T00:00:00New
1992-12-15T00:00:00 |
events/16/docs |
|
events/16/summary |
|
events/16/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st readingNew
Modified legislative proposal published |
events/17/date |
Old
1993-12-02T00:00:00New
1993-11-23T00:00:00 |
events/17/docs |
|
events/17/summary |
|
events/17/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/18/date |
Old
1994-02-24T00:00:00New
1993-11-22T00:00:00 |
events/18/docs |
|
events/18/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary confirming Parliament's position |
events/19/date |
Old
1994-04-27T00:00:00New
1993-12-02T00:00:00 |
events/19/docs |
|
events/19/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 2nd readingNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading |
events/20/body |
Old
EPNew
CSL |
events/20/date |
Old
1994-05-03T00:00:00New
1994-02-06T00:00:00 |
events/20/docs/0 |
|
events/20/docs/0 |
|
events/20/type |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Council position published |
events/21/date |
Old
1994-05-05T00:00:00New
1994-02-24T00:00:00 |
events/21/docs |
|
events/21/summary |
|
events/21/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 2nd readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading |
events/22/body |
Old
CSLNew
EP |
events/22/date |
Old
1994-09-19T00:00:00New
1994-04-27T00:00:00 |
events/22/summary |
|
events/22/type |
Old
Parliament's amendments rejected by CouncilNew
Vote in committee, 2nd reading |
events/23/body |
Old
EP/CSLNew
EP |
events/23/date |
Old
1994-11-28T00:00:00New
1994-04-26T00:00:00 |
events/23/docs |
|
events/23/summary |
|
events/23/type |
Old
Formal meeting of Conciliation CommitteeNew
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading |
events/24/body |
Old
EP/CSLNew
EP |
events/24/date |
Old
1995-01-12T00:00:00New
1994-05-03T00:00:00 |
events/24/docs |
|
events/24/summary/0 |
Second meeting of the Conciliation Committee. There was a majority position in the EP delegation, although it was not unanimous, on Mr Rothley’s proposal. The Council would respond at the next meeting of the Conciliation Committee due to be held on 23 January 1995.
|
events/24/type |
Old
Formal meeting of Conciliation CommitteeNew
Debate in Parliament |
events/25/body |
Old
EP/CSLNew
EP |
events/25/date |
Old
1995-01-23T00:00:00New
1994-05-05T00:00:00 |
events/25/docs |
|
events/25/summary/0 |
In relation to the common position of 7 February 1994, the joint text incorporated the amendments proposed by the EP at second reading, with the exception of the amendment concerning Recital 10 (patentability of parts of the human
|
events/25/summary/1 |
Body). The Conciliation Committee reached agreement on a new wording of this key recital: ‘…an invention based on elements that were susceptible of industrial
|
events/25/summary/2 |
application and produced from the human body by means of a technical process in such a way that they are no longer directly linked to a specific individual shall not be excluded from patentability due to the human origin of the elements, even where the structure of those elements is identical to those of a natural element, on the understanding that the parts of the human body from which those elements are derived shall be excluded from patentability’. In other words, parts of the human body were not patentable in principle, but they could be patentable when they formed part of an industrial invention and had been modified in such a way as to no longer be directly linked to an individual. However, problems of interpretation could arise in relation to the phrase ‘in such a way that they are no longer directly linked to a specific individual’. After noting that there was disagreement, it was decided that the Council and the EP would each make a statement on their interpretation of this phrase. The EP also pointed out that where there were different interpretations of legislative texts, it would be up to the Court of Justice to take a decision. The other main aspects of the Parliament/Council compromise related to: - modification of the genetic identity of animals. Provision was made to exclude from patentability ‘ processes for modifying the genetic identity of animals which are likely to cause them suffering or physical handicaps without any substantial benefit to man or animal, and also animals resulting from such processes, insofar as the suffering or physical handicaps inflicted on the animals concerned are out of proportion to the objective pursued’; - germ gene therapy. The EP, the Council and the Commission agreed on a joint statement that referred to the recent opinion of the Group of Advisers on the Ethical Implications of Biotechnology to the European
|
events/25/summary/3 |
Commission. In this opinion, the Group had stated that ‘having regard to the importance and the controversial nature of germ gene therapy and in light of the scientific knowledge available, human gene therapy is not currently acceptable from an ethical point of view’. - farmers’ rights. On this issue the Commission made the following statement: ‘When a Community legal provision on the breeding of animals enables farmers to use protected livestock for reproduction purposes on his farm in order to renew his stock, the Commission shall give due consideration to this for the purposes of incorporating such a derogation within the framework of the Directive’.
|
events/25/type |
Old
Final decision by Conciliation CommitteeNew
Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading |
events/26/body |
Old
EPNew
CSL |
events/26/date |
Old
1995-03-01T00:00:00New
1994-09-19T00:00:00 |
events/26/docs |
|
events/26/summary |
|
events/26/type |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Parliament's amendments rejected by Council |
events/27/body |
Old
EPNew
EP/CSL |
events/27/date |
Old
1995-03-01T00:00:00New
1994-11-28T00:00:00 |
events/27/docs |
|
events/27/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 3rd readingNew
Formal meeting of Conciliation Committee |
events/28/body |
Old
EPNew
EP/CSL |
events/28/date |
Old
1995-03-01T00:00:00New
1995-01-12T00:00:00 |
events/28/summary |
|
events/28/type |
Old
End of procedure in ParliamentNew
Formal meeting of Conciliation Committee |
events/29/body |
Old
EPNew
EP/CSL |
events/29/date |
Old
1995-03-01T00:00:00New
1995-01-23T00:00:00 |
events/29/summary |
|
events/29/type |
Old
End of procedure in ParliamentNew
Final decision by Conciliation Committee |
events/30 |
|
events/31 |
|
events/32 |
|
events/33 |
|
events/34 |
|
events/35 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1992:067:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1992:067:TOC |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1992:125:SOM:EN:HTMLNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1992:125:SOM:EN:HTML |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1992:125:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1992:125:SOM:EN:HTML |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1992:305:SOM:EN:HTMLNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1992:305:SOM:EN:HTML |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1992:305:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1992:305:SOM:EN:HTML |
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1993&nu_doc=570New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1993&nu_doc=570 |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1993:342:SOM:EN:HTMLNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1993:342:TOC |
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1993:342:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1993:342:SOM:EN:HTML |
docs/13/docs/1/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1994:101:SOM:EN:HTMLNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1994:101:SOM:EN:HTML |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=1994&nu_doc=275New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=1994&nu_doc=275 |
docs/18/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1994:205:SOM:EN:HTMLNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1994:205:TOC |
docs/19/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1994:205:SOM:EN:HTMLNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1994:205:TOC |
docs/20/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1994&nu_doc=245New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1994&nu_doc=245 |
docs/22/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:068:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:068:TOC |
docs/23/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:068:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:068:TOC |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/2/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19920210&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=19920210&type=CRE |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1988&nu_doc=496New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1988&nu_doc=496 |
events/4/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading |
events/6/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/7/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19920406&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=19920406&type=CRE |
events/9/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading |
events/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19920610&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=19920610&type=CRE |
events/12/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/13/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading |
events/14/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19921026&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=19921026&type=CRE |
events/15/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading |
events/16/body |
Old
ECNew
EP |
events/16/date |
Old
1992-12-16T00:00:00New
1993-11-23T00:00:00 |
events/16/docs |
|
events/16/summary |
|
events/16/type |
Old
Modified legislative proposal publishedNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/17/date |
Old
1993-11-23T00:00:00New
1993-12-02T00:00:00 |
events/17/docs |
|
events/17/summary |
|
events/17/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading |
events/18/date |
Old
1993-11-23T00:00:00New
1994-02-24T00:00:00 |
events/18/docs |
|
events/18/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary confirming Parliament's positionNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading |
events/19/date |
Old
1993-12-02T00:00:00New
1994-04-27T00:00:00 |
events/19/docs |
|
events/19/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 2nd reading |
events/20/body |
Old
CSLNew
EP |
events/20/date |
Old
1994-02-07T00:00:00New
1994-05-03T00:00:00 |
events/20/docs/0 |
|
events/20/docs/0 |
|
events/20/type |
Old
Council position publishedNew
Debate in Parliament |
events/21/date |
Old
1994-02-24T00:00:00New
1994-05-05T00:00:00 |
events/21/docs |
|
events/21/summary |
|
events/21/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd readingNew
Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading |
events/22/body |
Old
EPNew
CSL |
events/22/date |
Old
1994-04-27T00:00:00New
1994-09-19T00:00:00 |
events/22/summary |
|
events/22/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 2nd readingNew
Parliament's amendments rejected by Council |
events/23/body |
Old
EPNew
EP/CSL |
events/23/date |
Old
1994-04-27T00:00:00New
1994-11-28T00:00:00 |
events/23/docs |
|
events/23/summary |
|
events/23/type |
Old
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd readingNew
Formal meeting of Conciliation Committee |
events/24/body |
Old
EPNew
EP/CSL |
events/24/date |
Old
1994-05-03T00:00:00New
1995-01-12T00:00:00 |
events/24/docs |
|
events/24/summary/0 |
Second meeting of the Conciliation Committee. There was a majority position in the EP delegation, although it was not unanimous, on Mr Rothley’s proposal. The Council would respond at the next meeting of the Conciliation Committee due to be held on 23 January 1995.
|
events/24/type |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Formal meeting of Conciliation Committee |
events/25/body |
Old
EPNew
EP/CSL |
events/25/date |
Old
1994-05-05T00:00:00New
1995-01-23T00:00:00 |
events/25/docs |
|
events/25/summary/0 |
In relation to the common position of 7 February 1994, the joint text incorporated the amendments proposed by the EP at second reading, with the exception of the amendment concerning Recital 10 (patentability of parts of the human
|
events/25/summary/1 |
Body). The Conciliation Committee reached agreement on a new wording of this key recital: ‘…an invention based on elements that were susceptible of industrial
|
events/25/summary/2 |
application and produced from the human body by means of a technical process in such a way that they are no longer directly linked to a specific individual shall not be excluded from patentability due to the human origin of the elements, even where the structure of those elements is identical to those of a natural element, on the understanding that the parts of the human body from which those elements are derived shall be excluded from patentability’. In other words, parts of the human body were not patentable in principle, but they could be patentable when they formed part of an industrial invention and had been modified in such a way as to no longer be directly linked to an individual. However, problems of interpretation could arise in relation to the phrase ‘in such a way that they are no longer directly linked to a specific individual’. After noting that there was disagreement, it was decided that the Council and the EP would each make a statement on their interpretation of this phrase. The EP also pointed out that where there were different interpretations of legislative texts, it would be up to the Court of Justice to take a decision. The other main aspects of the Parliament/Council compromise related to: - modification of the genetic identity of animals. Provision was made to exclude from patentability ‘ processes for modifying the genetic identity of animals which are likely to cause them suffering or physical handicaps without any substantial benefit to man or animal, and also animals resulting from such processes, insofar as the suffering or physical handicaps inflicted on the animals concerned are out of proportion to the objective pursued’; - germ gene therapy. The EP, the Council and the Commission agreed on a joint statement that referred to the recent opinion of the Group of Advisers on the Ethical Implications of Biotechnology to the European
|
events/25/summary/3 |
Commission. In this opinion, the Group had stated that ‘having regard to the importance and the controversial nature of germ gene therapy and in light of the scientific knowledge available, human gene therapy is not currently acceptable from an ethical point of view’. - farmers’ rights. On this issue the Commission made the following statement: ‘When a Community legal provision on the breeding of animals enables farmers to use protected livestock for reproduction purposes on his farm in order to renew his stock, the Commission shall give due consideration to this for the purposes of incorporating such a derogation within the framework of the Directive’.
|
events/25/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 2nd readingNew
Final decision by Conciliation Committee |
events/26/body |
Old
CSLNew
EP |
events/26/date |
Old
1994-09-19T00:00:00New
1995-03-01T00:00:00 |
events/26/docs |
|
events/26/summary |
|
events/26/type |
Old
Parliament's amendments rejected by CouncilNew
Debate in Parliament |
events/27/body |
Old
EP/CSLNew
EP |
events/27/date |
Old
1994-11-28T00:00:00New
1995-03-01T00:00:00 |
events/27/docs |
|
events/27/type |
Old
Formal meeting of Conciliation CommitteeNew
Decision by Parliament, 3rd reading |
events/28/body |
Old
EP/CSLNew
EP |
events/28/date |
Old
1995-01-12T00:00:00New
1995-03-01T00:00:00 |
events/28/summary |
|
events/28/type |
Old
Formal meeting of Conciliation CommitteeNew
End of procedure in Parliament |
events/29/body |
Old
EP/CSLNew
EP |
events/29/date |
Old
1995-01-23T00:00:00New
1995-03-01T00:00:00 |
events/29/summary |
|
events/29/type |
Old
Final decision by Conciliation CommitteeNew
End of procedure in Parliament |
events/30 |
|
events/31 |
|
events/32 |
|
events/33 |
|
events/34 |
|
events/35 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 163
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 154
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CODE/4/05964New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
EC before Amsterdam E 100A
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
EC before Amsterdam E 100
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 154
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 154
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|