BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps
download json


1994/0188(COD) Kaleidoscope: Community action programme 1996-1998 to support artistic and cultural activities with a European dimension

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Former Committee Opinion RELA JUNKER Karin (icon: PES PES)
Former Committee Opinion BUDG DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara (icon: PES PES)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC before Amsterdam E 128

Events

2004/01/23
   EC - Follow-up document
Documents
COM(2004)0033
EUR-Lex
1996/04/20
   Final act published in Official Journal
Documents
Decision 1996/719
OJ L 099 20.04.1996, p. 0020
1996/03/29
   CSL - Final act signed
1996/03/29
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
1996/03/14
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 3rd reading
Documents
OJ C 096 01.04.1996, p. 0221-0232
T4-0120/1996
1996/03/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 3rd reading
Documents
T4-0120/1996
1996/03/14
   CSL - Decision by Council, 3rd reading
1996/03/14
   CSL - Council Meeting
1996/03/12
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Details

The rapporteur, Mr Augias (PSE, I), was critical of the Council’s predisposition for renationalising cultural policy. He also regretted that Parliament had failed to make the ‘European City of Culture’ action a stand-alone programme. However, as far as the programme’s duration and budget were concerned he welcomed the compromise that had been reached and the specific clause on renewal that had been obtained by Parliament. Finally, he recalled that Parliament had succeeded in introducing a new paragraph concerning programme initiatives linked to Europe Day on 9 May. Commissioner Monti stated that the adoption of the Kaleidoscope programme would help complete the other two procedures relating to the ‘Raphael’ programme on cultural heritage and the ‘Ariane’ programme on books and reading, which were based on Article 128 of the Maastricht Treaty. He further announced that the programme in question would shortly be launched by way of an invitation to tender published in the Official Journal, and that its management would be simple and efficient, which was just what citizens wanted.

Documents
Debate in Parliament
1996/03/06
   EP - Report tabled for plenary by Parliament delegation to Conciliation Committee, 3rd reading
Documents
A4-0071/1996
OJ C 096 01.04.1996, p. 0004
1996/03/05
   EP - Report tabled for plenary, 3rd reading
Documents
A4-0071/1996
1996/01/31
   CSL/EP - Joint text approved by Conciliation Committee co-chairs
Documents
8428/1995
1996/01/31
   EP/CSL - Final decision by Conciliation Committee
1996/01/30
   EP/CSL - Joint text approved by Conciliation Committee co-chairs
Documents
8428/1995
1995/12/15
   EC - Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading
Documents
EUR-Lex
COM(1995)0659
1995/12/04
   EP/CSL - Formal meeting of Conciliation Committee
1995/11/27
   CSL - Parliament's amendments rejected by Council
Details

The Council established that it was not in a position to accept all the European Parliament’s amendments to its common position on the Decision establishing a programme to support artistic and cultural activities having a European dimension (Kaleidoscope). It therefore proposed to the European Parliament that the Conciliation Committee be convened in accordance with Article 189b of the Treaty.

1995/11/27
   CSL - Council Meeting
1995/11/20
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council noted that on 15 November 1995 the European Parliament had adopted substantial amendments to its common position of 10 July 1995 on the programme to support artistic and cultural activities having a European dimension (Kaleidoscope). Commissioner OREJA gave the Commission’s views on these amendments. The Council instructed Coreper to examine the amendments with a view to convening a Conciliation Committee if necessary. The amendments adopted by Parliament at second reading concern inter alia : - adoption of the duration and financing of the programme originally proposed by the Commission (i.e. 5 years and ECU 68 million instead of the 3 years and ECU 26.5 million decided on by the Council); - the type of committee to assist the Commission in implementing the programme (which Parliament would like to be an ‘advisory committee’ while the Council had opted for a ‘management committee’ in some cases and an ‘advisory committee’ in others).

Documents
1884
1995/11/20
   CSL - Council Meeting
1995/11/15
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 2nd reading
Documents
OJ C 323 04.12.1995, p. 0025-0031
T4-0532/1995
1995/11/15
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
Documents
T4-0532/1995
1995/11/14
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Details

The rapporteur stated that the changes the Council had made in its common position to the Commission proposal, following Parliament’s vote at first reading, were unacceptable, in particular: the reduction in the duration of the programme from five years to three years; the reduction in the budget from ECU 68 million to ECU 26.5 million; the replacement of the single committee with a double committee (advisory and management); and the elimination of specific measures for access and continuing training. The rapporteur added that it was likely that adoption of this programme would involve conciliation. As regards the choice of the European city of culture, which the parliamentary committee had wanted to remove from the Kaleidoscope programme for budgetary reasons, Mr AUGIAS supported the decision to appoint 15 cities for the year 2000 but regretted that this decision would be adopted by the Council as part of the intergovernmental procedure even though Parliament was already involved in allocating budgetary appropriations to this programme under the codecision procedure provided for in Article 128. As far as Kaleidoscope was concerned, the rapporteur hoped that Parliament would adopt it as it stood at first reading. Commissioner GRADIN welcomed the fact that through the AUGIAS report Parliament was seeking to implement an ambitious cultural policy for the European Union. She, too, did not share the reservations expressed by the Council on the duration of the programme in particular, but she felt that conciliation between Parliament and the Council was possible.

Documents
Debate in Parliament
1995/10/10
   EP - Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
Documents
A4-0243/1995
OJ C 308 20.11.1995, p. 0004
1995/10/10
   EP - Vote in committee, 2nd reading
1995/10/09
   EP - Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
Documents
A4-0243/1995
1995/09/21
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading
1995/09/18
   EC - Commission communication on Council's position
Documents
EUR-Lex
SEC(1995)1468
1995/09/07
   EP - JUNKER Karin (PES) appointed as rapporteur in RELA
1995/07/28
   EC - Modified legislative proposal
Documents
EUR-Lex
OJ C 278 24.10.1995, p. 0009
COM(1995)0373
1995/07/27
   EC - Modified legislative proposal published
Documents
EUR-Lex
COM(1995)0373
1995/07/10
   CSL - Council position
Documents
08428/1/1995
OJ C 281 25.10.1995, p. 0010
1995/07/10
   CSL - Council Meeting
1995/07/09
   CSL - Council position published
Documents
08428/1/1995
1995/06/21
   CSL - Council Meeting
1995/04/21
   CofR - Committee of the Regions: opinion
Details

The Committee made numerous comments highlighting the shortcomings of the Commission proposal with regard to the possibility of funding transnational touring by artists, whether as individuals, or as participants in an artistic production. The emphasis on innovation or the emblematic nature of projects could unhelpfully inhibit support for good projects that might not necessarily be innovative or emblematic. Innovation could be one criterion for approval of a project but should not be the only one, nor should it override other equally important criteria. There could be more value in funding the continuation or embedding of a project, than in funding an innovative or emblematic project that already received considerable local or national support. The ESC also regretted that the programme did not provide any definition of ‘culture’. Congruent with that omission was the failure to recognise the key role regions and towns played in supporting Europe ’s cultural diversity. Finally, the programme should also avoid making assumptions about the homogeneous nature of national culture, thus ignoring the rich diversity of regional cultures within the Member States.

Documents
CDR0145/1995
OJ C 100 02.04.1996, p. 0030
1995/04/07
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
OJ C 109 01.05.1995, p. 0271-0281
T4-0176/1995
1995/04/07
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Documents
T4-0176/1995
1995/04/06
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Details

Mr Augias called for the programme to be extended to include certain types of large-scale cultural activities and to be applied to the EEA countries and the Council of Europe. The Commission should present a detailed, final report two years after the entry into force of the programme. It should also ensure access to culture for disadvantaged regions and people through financial decisions in the annual budgetary framework. Commissioner Oreja stated that thanks, in part, to Parliament’s contribution it would be possible to implement the Kaleidoscope 2000 programme the following year. The Commission could take over most of Parliament’s amendments. Although Amendments Nos 24, 25 and 27 could be taken over, they would have to be supplemented as the provisional assessment provided for would only be possible in the six months following the second year of the programme’s operation. However, a number of amendments had to be rejected: Amendment No 6 as the programme was incompatible with any form of coercion; Amendments Nos 17, 37, 43, 44 and 45 as they went beyond the objectives of the programme; Amendments Nos 21, 23 and 38 as they did not comply with the Council’s decision nor the interinstitutional ‘modus vivendi’ on committee procedure.

Documents
Debate in Parliament
1995/03/22
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
A4-0072/1995
OJ C 109 01.05.1995, p. 0005
1995/03/22
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
1995/03/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Documents
A4-0072/1995
1994/12/06
   EP - DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara (PES) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
1994/11/30
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
1994/10/25
   EC - Legislative proposal
Documents
EUR-Lex
COM(1994)0356
1994/10/24
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Documents
EUR-Lex
COM(1994)0356

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

2023-08-03Show (29) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0
date
1994-10-25T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/0
date
1995-01-25T00:00:00
docs
title: PE211.116
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/1
date
1995-03-22T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/1
date
1995-03-22T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:109:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:109:TOC
docs/4
date
1995-07-10T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Council position
body
CSL
docs/4
date
1995-04-27T00:00:00
docs
title: PE211.291/DEF
committee
RELA
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:281:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:281:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/5
date
1995-04-27T00:00:00
docs
title: PE211.752/DEF
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/6
date
1995-07-10T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Council position
body
CSL
docs/7
date
1995-10-10T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs/8
date
1995-11-15T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:323:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:323:TOC
docs/9
date
1995-10-10T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs/10
date
1995-10-13T00:00:00
docs
title: PE214.708
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/11
date
1995-11-15T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs/13
date
2004-01-23T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/13/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0033/COM_COM(2004)0033_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0033/COM_COM(2004)0033_EN.pdf
docs/16
date
1996-03-26T00:00:00
docs
title: PE212.905
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/17
date
2004-01-23T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
events/0/date
Old
1994-10-25T00:00:00
New
1994-10-24T00:00:00
events/3
date
1995-03-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1995-0072_EN.html title: A4-0072/1995
events/3
date
1995-03-22T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
title: A4-0072/1995
events/6/date
Old
1995-07-10T00:00:00
New
1995-07-09T00:00:00
events/7/date
Old
1995-07-28T00:00:00
New
1995-07-27T00:00:00
events/10
date
1995-10-09T00:00:00
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1995-0243_EN.html title: A4-0243/1995
events/10
date
1995-10-10T00:00:00
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs
title: A4-0243/1995
events/17/date
Old
1996-01-31T00:00:00
New
1996-01-30T00:00:00
events/18/date
Old
1996-03-06T00:00:00
New
1996-03-05T00:00:00
2021-12-18Show (13) Changes | Timetravel
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:109:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:109:TOC
docs/3
date
1995-04-21T00:00:00
docs
summary
The Committee made numerous comments highlighting the shortcomings of the Commission proposal with regard to the possibility of funding transnational touring by artists, whether as individuals, or as participants in an artistic production. The emphasis on innovation or the emblematic nature of projects could unhelpfully inhibit support for good projects that might not necessarily be innovative or emblematic. Innovation could be one criterion for approval of a project but should not be the only one, nor should it override other equally important criteria. There could be more value in funding the continuation or embedding of a project, than in funding an innovative or emblematic project that already received considerable local or national support. The ESC also regretted that the programme did not provide any definition of ‘culture’. Congruent with that omission was the failure to recognise the key role regions and towns played in supporting Europe ’s cultural diversity. Finally, the programme should also avoid making assumptions about the homogeneous nature of national culture, thus ignoring the rich diversity of regional cultures within the Member States.
type
Committee of the Regions: opinion
body
CofR
docs/3
date
1995-04-21T00:00:00
docs
summary
The Committee made numerous comments highlighting the shortcomings of the Commission proposal with regard to the possibility of funding transnational touring by artists, whether as individuals, or as participants in an artistic production. The emphasis on innovation or the emblematic nature of projects could unhelpfully inhibit support for good projects that might not necessarily be innovative or emblematic. Innovation could be one criterion for approval of a project but should not be the only one, nor should it override other equally important criteria. There could be more value in funding the continuation or embedding of a project, than in funding an innovative or emblematic project that already received considerable local or national support. The ESC also regretted that the programme did not provide any definition of ‘culture’. Congruent with that omission was the failure to recognise the key role regions and towns played in supporting Europe ’s cultural diversity. Finally, the programme should also avoid making assumptions about the homogeneous nature of national culture, thus ignoring the rich diversity of regional cultures within the Member States.
type
Committee of the Regions: opinion
body
CofR
docs/11/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:323:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:323:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/14/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1996-0071_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1996-0071_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/3/type
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19950406&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=19950406&type=CRE
events/5/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
events/11/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19951114&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=19951114&type=CRE
events/18/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1996-0071_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1996-0071_EN.html
events/19/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19960312&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=19960312&type=CRE
2020-01-19Show (8) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara date: 1994-12-06T00:00:00 group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/0
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
1994-12-06T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/1
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
External Economic Relations
committee
RELA
rapporteur
name: JUNKER Karin date: 1995-09-07T00:00:00 group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/1
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
External Economic Relations
committee
RELA
date
1995-09-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: JUNKER Karin group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
docs/6/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:281:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:281:TOC
docs/14/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1996-71&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1996-0071_EN.html
docs/17/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0033/COM_COM(2004)0033_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0033/COM_COM(2004)0033_EN.pdf
events/18/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1996-71&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1996-0071_EN.html
2019-07-06Show (14) Changes | Timetravel
activities
  • date: 1994-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1994&nu_doc=356 title: COM(1994)0356 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:51994DC0356:EN body: EC commission: type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 1994-11-30T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 1994-12-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara body: EP responsible: False committee: RELA date: 1995-09-07T00:00:00 committee_full: RELA External Economic Relations rapporteur: group: PSE name: JUNKER Karin
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 1994-12-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara body: EP responsible: False committee: RELA date: 1995-09-07T00:00:00 committee_full: RELA External Economic Relations rapporteur: group: PSE name: JUNKER Karin docs: type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A4-0072/1995 date: 1995-03-22T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 1995-04-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19950406&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T4-0176/1995 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 1995-06-21T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Culture meeting_id: 1860
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1863 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=8428%2F95&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Council position published title: 08428/1/1995 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 1995-07-10T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 1995-07-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1995&nu_doc=373 title: COM(1995)0373 type: Modified legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:51995PC0373:EN body: EC commission: type: Modified legislative proposal published
  • date: 1995-09-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading
  • date: 1995-10-10T00:00:00 body: EP docs: type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading title: A4-0243/1995 type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading
  • date: 1995-11-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19951114&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1995-11-15T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading title: T4-0532/1995 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1884 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1884*&MEET_DATE=20/11/1995 type: Debate in Council title: 1884 council: Culture date: 1995-11-20T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1888 council: Telecommunications date: 1995-11-27T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 1995-12-04T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Formal meeting of Conciliation Committee
  • date: 1996-01-31T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL docs: type: Joint text approved by Conciliation Committee co-chairs title: 8428/1995 type: Final decision by Conciliation Committee
  • date: 1996-03-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1996-71&language=EN type: Report tabled for plenary, 3rd reading title: A4-0071/1996 body: EP type: Report tabled for plenary, 3rd reading
  • date: 1996-03-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19960312&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1996-03-14T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 1908
  • date: 1996-03-14T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 3rd reading title: T4-0120/1996 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 3rd reading
  • date: 1996-03-29T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 1996-03-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 1996-04-20T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=31996D0719 title: Decision 1996/719 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:1996:099:TOC title: OJ L 099 20.04.1996, p. 0020
committees/0
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
1994-12-06T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
1994-12-06T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: PSE name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara
committees/1
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
External Economic Relations
committee
RELA
date
1995-09-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: JUNKER Karin group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
RELA
date
1995-09-07T00:00:00
committee_full
RELA External Economic Relations
rapporteur
group: PSE name: JUNKER Karin
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 1908 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1908*&MEET_DATE=14/03/1996 date: 1996-03-14T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Telecommunications meeting_id: 1888 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1888*&MEET_DATE=27/11/1995 date: 1995-11-27T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Culture meeting_id: 1884 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1884*&MEET_DATE=20/11/1995 date: 1995-11-20T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 1863 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1863*&MEET_DATE=10/07/1995 date: 1995-07-10T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Culture meeting_id: 1860 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1860*&MEET_DATE=21/06/1995 date: 1995-06-21T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 1995-01-25T00:00:00 docs: title: PE211.116 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 1995-03-22T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:109:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 109 01.05.1995, p. 0005 title: A4-0072/1995 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:109:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 109 01.05.1995, p. 0271-0281 title: T4-0176/1995 summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-04-21T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0145)(documentyear:1995)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CDR0145/1995 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1996:100:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 100 02.04.1996, p. 0030 summary: The Committee made numerous comments highlighting the shortcomings of the Commission proposal with regard to the possibility of funding transnational touring by artists, whether as individuals, or as participants in an artistic production. The emphasis on innovation or the emblematic nature of projects could unhelpfully inhibit support for good projects that might not necessarily be innovative or emblematic. Innovation could be one criterion for approval of a project but should not be the only one, nor should it override other equally important criteria. There could be more value in funding the continuation or embedding of a project, than in funding an innovative or emblematic project that already received considerable local or national support. The ESC also regretted that the programme did not provide any definition of ‘culture’. Congruent with that omission was the failure to recognise the key role regions and towns played in supporting Europe ’s cultural diversity. Finally, the programme should also avoid making assumptions about the homogeneous nature of national culture, thus ignoring the rich diversity of regional cultures within the Member States. type: Committee of the Regions: opinion body: CofR
  • date: 1995-04-27T00:00:00 docs: title: PE211.291/DEF committee: RELA type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 1995-04-27T00:00:00 docs: title: PE211.752/DEF committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 1995-07-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=8428%2F95&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 08428/1/1995 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:281:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 281 25.10.1995, p. 0010 summary: type: Council position body: CSL
  • date: 1995-07-28T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1995&nu_doc=373 title: EUR-Lex url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:278:TOC title: OJ C 278 24.10.1995, p. 0009 title: COM(1995)0373 summary: type: Modified legislative proposal body: EC
  • date: 1995-09-18T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=1995&nu_doc=1468 title: EUR-Lex title: SEC(1995)1468 summary: type: Commission communication on Council's position body: EC
  • date: 1995-10-10T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:308:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 308 20.11.1995, p. 0004 title: A4-0243/1995 type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-10-13T00:00:00 docs: title: PE214.708 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 1995-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:323:TOC title: OJ C 323 04.12.1995, p. 0025-0031 title: T4-0532/1995 summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-12-15T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1995&nu_doc=659 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(1995)0659 summary: type: Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading body: EC
  • date: 1996-01-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=8428%2F95&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 8428/1995 type: Joint text approved by Conciliation Committee co-chairs body: CSL/EP
  • date: 1996-03-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1996-71&language=EN title: A4-0071/1996 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1996:096:TOC title: OJ C 096 01.04.1996, p. 0004 type: Report tabled for plenary by Parliament delegation to Conciliation Committee, 3rd reading body: EP
  • date: 1996-03-14T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1996:096:TOC title: OJ C 096 01.04.1996, p. 0221-0232 title: T4-0120/1996 summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 3rd reading body: EP
  • date: 1996-03-26T00:00:00 docs: title: PE212.905 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2004-01-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0033/COM_COM(2004)0033_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0033 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=33 title: EUR-Lex summary: type: Follow-up document body: EC
events
  • date: 1994-10-25T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1994&nu_doc=356 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(1994)0356 summary:
  • date: 1994-11-30T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-03-22T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 1995-03-22T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: title: A4-0072/1995
  • date: 1995-04-06T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19950406&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament summary: Mr Augias called for the programme to be extended to include certain types of large-scale cultural activities and to be applied to the EEA countries and the Council of Europe. The Commission should present a detailed, final report two years after the entry into force of the programme. It should also ensure access to culture for disadvantaged regions and people through financial decisions in the annual budgetary framework. Commissioner Oreja stated that thanks, in part, to Parliament’s contribution it would be possible to implement the Kaleidoscope 2000 programme the following year. The Commission could take over most of Parliament’s amendments. Although Amendments Nos 24, 25 and 27 could be taken over, they would have to be supplemented as the provisional assessment provided for would only be possible in the six months following the second year of the programme’s operation. However, a number of amendments had to be rejected: Amendment No 6 as the programme was incompatible with any form of coercion; Amendments Nos 17, 37, 43, 44 and 45 as they went beyond the objectives of the programme; Amendments Nos 21, 23 and 38 as they did not comply with the Council’s decision nor the interinstitutional ‘modus vivendi’ on committee procedure.
  • date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: title: T4-0176/1995 summary:
  • date: 1995-07-10T00:00:00 type: Council position published body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=8428%2F95&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 08428/1/1995 summary:
  • date: 1995-07-28T00:00:00 type: Modified legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1995&nu_doc=373 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(1995)0373 summary:
  • date: 1995-09-21T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-10-10T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 1995-10-10T00:00:00 type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading body: EP docs: title: A4-0243/1995
  • date: 1995-11-14T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19951114&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament summary: The rapporteur stated that the changes the Council had made in its common position to the Commission proposal, following Parliament’s vote at first reading, were unacceptable, in particular: the reduction in the duration of the programme from five years to three years; the reduction in the budget from ECU 68 million to ECU 26.5 million; the replacement of the single committee with a double committee (advisory and management); and the elimination of specific measures for access and continuing training. The rapporteur added that it was likely that adoption of this programme would involve conciliation. As regards the choice of the European city of culture, which the parliamentary committee had wanted to remove from the Kaleidoscope programme for budgetary reasons, Mr AUGIAS supported the decision to appoint 15 cities for the year 2000 but regretted that this decision would be adopted by the Council as part of the intergovernmental procedure even though Parliament was already involved in allocating budgetary appropriations to this programme under the codecision procedure provided for in Article 128. As far as Kaleidoscope was concerned, the rapporteur hoped that Parliament would adopt it as it stood at first reading. Commissioner GRADIN welcomed the fact that through the AUGIAS report Parliament was seeking to implement an ambitious cultural policy for the European Union. She, too, did not share the reservations expressed by the Council on the duration of the programme in particular, but she felt that conciliation between Parliament and the Council was possible.
  • date: 1995-11-15T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP docs: title: T4-0532/1995 summary:
  • date: 1995-11-20T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1884*&MEET_DATE=20/11/1995 title: 1884 summary: The Council noted that on 15 November 1995 the European Parliament had adopted substantial amendments to its common position of 10 July 1995 on the programme to support artistic and cultural activities having a European dimension (Kaleidoscope). Commissioner OREJA gave the Commission’s views on these amendments. The Council instructed Coreper to examine the amendments with a view to convening a Conciliation Committee if necessary. The amendments adopted by Parliament at second reading concern inter alia : - adoption of the duration and financing of the programme originally proposed by the Commission (i.e. 5 years and ECU 68 million instead of the 3 years and ECU 26.5 million decided on by the Council); - the type of committee to assist the Commission in implementing the programme (which Parliament would like to be an ‘advisory committee’ while the Council had opted for a ‘management committee’ in some cases and an ‘advisory committee’ in others).
  • date: 1995-11-27T00:00:00 type: Parliament's amendments rejected by Council body: CSL summary: The Council established that it was not in a position to accept all the European Parliament’s amendments to its common position on the Decision establishing a programme to support artistic and cultural activities having a European dimension (Kaleidoscope). It therefore proposed to the European Parliament that the Conciliation Committee be convened in accordance with Article 189b of the Treaty.
  • date: 1995-12-04T00:00:00 type: Formal meeting of Conciliation Committee body: EP/CSL
  • date: 1996-01-31T00:00:00 type: Final decision by Conciliation Committee body: EP/CSL summary:
  • date: 1996-01-31T00:00:00 type: Joint text approved by Conciliation Committee co-chairs body: EP/CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=8428%2F95&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 8428/1995
  • date: 1996-03-06T00:00:00 type: Report tabled for plenary, 3rd reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1996-71&language=EN title: A4-0071/1996
  • date: 1996-03-12T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19960312&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament summary: The rapporteur, Mr Augias (PSE, I), was critical of the Council’s predisposition for renationalising cultural policy. He also regretted that Parliament had failed to make the ‘European City of Culture’ action a stand-alone programme. However, as far as the programme’s duration and budget were concerned he welcomed the compromise that had been reached and the specific clause on renewal that had been obtained by Parliament. Finally, he recalled that Parliament had succeeded in introducing a new paragraph concerning programme initiatives linked to Europe Day on 9 May. Commissioner Monti stated that the adoption of the Kaleidoscope programme would help complete the other two procedures relating to the ‘Raphael’ programme on cultural heritage and the ‘Ariane’ programme on books and reading, which were based on Article 128 of the Maastricht Treaty. He further announced that the programme in question would shortly be launched by way of an invitation to tender published in the Official Journal, and that its management would be simple and efficient, which was just what citizens wanted.
  • date: 1996-03-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 3rd reading body: EP docs: title: T4-0120/1996 summary:
  • date: 1996-03-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Council, 3rd reading body: CSL
  • date: 1996-03-29T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL
  • date: 1996-03-29T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 1996-04-20T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: title: Decision 1996/719 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=31996D0719 title: OJ L 099 20.04.1996, p. 0020 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:1996:099:TOC
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CODE/4/07336
New
  • CODE/4/07336
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=31996D0719
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=31996D0719
procedure/instrument
Old
Decision
New
  • Decision
  • Amended by 1998/0283(COD)
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.45.02 Cultural programmes and actions, assistance
  • 4.45.08 Cultural and artistic activities, books and reading, arts
New
4.45.02
Cultural programmes and actions, assistance
4.45.08
Cultural and artistic activities, books and reading, arts
procedure/summary
  • Amended by
2015-11-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
2014-11-10Show (5) Changes
activities
  • date: 1994-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1994&nu_doc=356 celexid: CELEX:51994DC0356:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(1994)0356 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission:
  • date: 1994-11-30T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 1994-12-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara body: EP responsible: False committee: RELA date: 1995-09-07T00:00:00 committee_full: RELA External Economic Relations rapporteur: group: PSE name: JUNKER Karin
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 1994-12-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara body: EP responsible: False committee: RELA date: 1995-09-07T00:00:00 committee_full: RELA External Economic Relations rapporteur: group: PSE name: JUNKER Karin docs: type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A4-0072/1995 date: 1995-03-22T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 1995-04-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19950406&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T4-0176/1995 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 1995-06-21T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Culture meeting_id: 1860
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1863 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=8428%2F95&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Council position published title: 08428/1/1995 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 1995-07-10T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 1995-07-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1995&nu_doc=373 celexid: CELEX:51995PC0373:EN type: Modified legislative proposal published title: COM(1995)0373 type: Modified legislative proposal published body: EC commission:
  • date: 1995-09-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading
  • date: 1995-10-10T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading body: EP docs: type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading title: A4-0243/1995
  • date: 1995-11-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19951114&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1995-11-15T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading title: T4-0532/1995 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1884 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1884*&MEET_DATE=20/11/1995 type: Debate in Council title: 1884 council: Culture date: 1995-11-20T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1888 council: Telecommunications date: 1995-11-27T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 1995-12-04T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Formal meeting of Conciliation Committee
  • date: 1996-01-31T00:00:00 type: Final decision by Conciliation Committee body: EP/CSL docs: type: Joint text approved by Conciliation Committee co-chairs title: 8428/1995
  • date: 1996-03-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1996-71&language=EN type: Report tabled for plenary, 3rd reading title: A4-0071/1996 body: EP type: Report tabled for plenary, 3rd reading
  • date: 1996-03-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19960312&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1996-03-14T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 1908
  • date: 1996-03-14T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 3rd reading title: T4-0120/1996 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 3rd reading
  • date: 1996-03-29T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 1996-03-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 1996-04-20T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=31996D0719 title: Decision 1996/719 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:1996:099:TOC title: OJ L 099 20.04.1996, p. 0020
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 1994-12-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: RELA date: 1995-09-07T00:00:00 committee_full: RELA External Economic Relations rapporteur: group: PSE name: JUNKER Karin
links
European Commission
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CODE/4/07336
reference
1994/0188(COD)
instrument
Decision
legal_basis
EC before Amsterdam E 128
stage_reached
Procedure completed
summary
Amended by
subtype
Legislation
title
Kaleidoscope: Community action programme 1996-1998 to support artistic and cultural activities with a European dimension
type
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
final
subject
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation