BETA


1994/2079(COS) The way forward for civil aviation in Europe

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead TRAN SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion ENER MOMBAUR Peter Michael (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion ECON KATIFORIS Giorgos (icon: PES PES)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 142

Events

1995/03/06
   Final act published in Official Journal
1995/02/22
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Details

While agreeing with the views of the Commission, which stated that ‘it is firmly convinced that the European aviation industry will re-achieve sustainable growth and profitability only if, in addition to the management task of restructuring carriers which need to be supported by enforcing the Third Package provisions, public authorities work towards a quick solution to the extra burden caused by inadequate diversity of standards, allocation of responsibilities and other rigidities’, the ESC considered that the Commission’s overall response was inadequate to meet the challenge of working in a ‘consumer-driven market’. It believed that, in particular, the Commission and the Member States should work to ensure existing legislation operated to meet their objectives and that the problems of both inadequate airport capacity and air-traffic management systems were addressed vigorously. The ESC believed in particular that: - the Commission should ensure that State aid was limited to reconstruction and to where a public service obligation was established, and did not prejudice the workings of the internal market (see section 3.7); - the Commission should work with the Council on a common external policy on the basis of Article 84 (see section 3.8). With air transport evolving against a background of worldwide competition, the failure to give priority to the framing of an external EU policy would have a harmful effect not only in terms of obtaining and maintaining routes but also in the context of the social sector (emergence of social dumping); - more detailed attention needed to be given to the issue of safety (see section 3.9.); - the Commission should give urgent consideration to the high airport and en route charges. As the Wise Men’s report stated, ‘the European region suffers from extraordinary high user charges’ (see section 3.10.). The charges airports made direct to scheduled European airlines represented 4 to 6% of operating costs, compared with less than 2% in the United States . This relative difference had even more impact on ATC charges where no en-route charge existed for domestic US traffic; - the Commission was equivocal on taxation and financing issues. There should be a clear statement that no extra tax burdens on the industry would be proposed; - the recommendations relating to social issues were too vague: detailed proposals were needed notably on the need to ensure workers could adapt to changing market conditions and also the need to safeguard and harmonise the quality of employment and working conditions in accordance with the principle of social progress enshrined in Articles 2 and 117 of the Treaty. In any event, the issue was treated as almost an afterthought (see section 3.16.). The Economic and Social Committee felt that the liberalisation process had been underway long enough to allow a first report to be drawn up on its social impact, especially its effect on employment and working conditions. This would make it possible to pinpoint any adverse effects and to examine how these could be corrected; - the Commission should take into account that a ‘consumer-driven market’ was more than one in which fares were related to costs. It should also be one in which customers individually were enabled to make properly informed choices based on information at the point of sale including quality of service and performance statistics.

1995/02/14
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
1995/02/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Documents
1995/02/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
1995/02/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
1995/01/30
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
1995/01/30
   EP - Vote in committee
1995/01/29
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
1994/10/13
   EP - MOMBAUR Peter Michael (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ENER
1994/10/04
   EP - KATIFORIS Giorgos (PES) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
1994/09/14
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
1994/09/01
   EP - SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
1994/06/01
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
1994/05/31
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
1994-06-01T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/0
date
1994-12-01T00:00:00
docs
title: PE210.854/DEF
committee
ECON
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/1
date
1995-01-30T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs/1
date
1994-12-01T00:00:00
docs
title: PE210.284/AM
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/2
date
1994-12-08T00:00:00
docs
title: PE210.923/DEF
committee
ENER
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/3
date
1995-01-30T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs/4
date
1995-02-07T00:00:00
docs
title: PE210.284
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
events/0/date
Old
1994-06-01T00:00:00
New
1994-05-31T00:00:00
events/3
date
1995-01-29T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1995-0012_EN.html title: A4-0012/1995
events/3
date
1995-01-30T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
title: A4-0012/1995
docs/6
date
1995-02-22T00:00:00
docs
summary
While agreeing with the views of the Commission, which stated that ‘it is firmly convinced that the European aviation industry will re-achieve sustainable growth and profitability only if, in addition to the management task of restructuring carriers which need to be supported by enforcing the Third Package provisions, public authorities work towards a quick solution to the extra burden caused by inadequate diversity of standards, allocation of responsibilities and other rigidities’, the ESC considered that the Commission’s overall response was inadequate to meet the challenge of working in a ‘consumer-driven market’. It believed that, in particular, the Commission and the Member States should work to ensure existing legislation operated to meet their objectives and that the problems of both inadequate airport capacity and air-traffic management systems were addressed vigorously. The ESC believed in particular that: - the Commission should ensure that State aid was limited to reconstruction and to where a public service obligation was established, and did not prejudice the workings of the internal market (see section 3.7); - the Commission should work with the Council on a common external policy on the basis of Article 84 (see section 3.8). With air transport evolving against a background of worldwide competition, the failure to give priority to the framing of an external EU policy would have a harmful effect not only in terms of obtaining and maintaining routes but also in the context of the social sector (emergence of social dumping); - more detailed attention needed to be given to the issue of safety (see section 3.9.); - the Commission should give urgent consideration to the high airport and en route charges. As the Wise Men’s report stated, ‘the European region suffers from extraordinary high user charges’ (see section 3.10.). The charges airports made direct to scheduled European airlines represented 4 to 6% of operating costs, compared with less than 2% in the United States . This relative difference had even more impact on ATC charges where no en-route charge existed for domestic US traffic; - the Commission was equivocal on taxation and financing issues. There should be a clear statement that no extra tax burdens on the industry would be proposed; - the recommendations relating to social issues were too vague: detailed proposals were needed notably on the need to ensure workers could adapt to changing market conditions and also the need to safeguard and harmonise the quality of employment and working conditions in accordance with the principle of social progress enshrined in Articles 2 and 117 of the Treaty. In any event, the issue was treated as almost an afterthought (see section 3.16.). The Economic and Social Committee felt that the liberalisation process had been underway long enough to allow a first report to be drawn up on its social impact, especially its effect on employment and working conditions. This would make it possible to pinpoint any adverse effects and to examine how these could be corrected; - the Commission should take into account that a ‘consumer-driven market’ was more than one in which fares were related to costs. It should also be one in which customers individually were enabled to make properly informed choices based on information at the point of sale including quality of service and performance statistics.
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/6
date
1995-02-22T00:00:00
docs
summary
While agreeing with the views of the Commission, which stated that ‘it is firmly convinced that the European aviation industry will re-achieve sustainable growth and profitability only if, in addition to the management task of restructuring carriers which need to be supported by enforcing the Third Package provisions, public authorities work towards a quick solution to the extra burden caused by inadequate diversity of standards, allocation of responsibilities and other rigidities’, the ESC considered that the Commission’s overall response was inadequate to meet the challenge of working in a ‘consumer-driven market’. It believed that, in particular, the Commission and the Member States should work to ensure existing legislation operated to meet their objectives and that the problems of both inadequate airport capacity and air-traffic management systems were addressed vigorously. The ESC believed in particular that: - the Commission should ensure that State aid was limited to reconstruction and to where a public service obligation was established, and did not prejudice the workings of the internal market (see section 3.7); - the Commission should work with the Council on a common external policy on the basis of Article 84 (see section 3.8). With air transport evolving against a background of worldwide competition, the failure to give priority to the framing of an external EU policy would have a harmful effect not only in terms of obtaining and maintaining routes but also in the context of the social sector (emergence of social dumping); - more detailed attention needed to be given to the issue of safety (see section 3.9.); - the Commission should give urgent consideration to the high airport and en route charges. As the Wise Men’s report stated, ‘the European region suffers from extraordinary high user charges’ (see section 3.10.). The charges airports made direct to scheduled European airlines represented 4 to 6% of operating costs, compared with less than 2% in the United States . This relative difference had even more impact on ATC charges where no en-route charge existed for domestic US traffic; - the Commission was equivocal on taxation and financing issues. There should be a clear statement that no extra tax burdens on the industry would be proposed; - the recommendations relating to social issues were too vague: detailed proposals were needed notably on the need to ensure workers could adapt to changing market conditions and also the need to safeguard and harmonise the quality of employment and working conditions in accordance with the principle of social progress enshrined in Articles 2 and 117 of the Treaty. In any event, the issue was treated as almost an afterthought (see section 3.16.). The Economic and Social Committee felt that the liberalisation process had been underway long enough to allow a first report to be drawn up on its social impact, especially its effect on employment and working conditions. This would make it possible to pinpoint any adverse effects and to examine how these could be corrected; - the Commission should take into account that a ‘consumer-driven market’ was more than one in which fares were related to costs. It should also be one in which customers individually were enabled to make properly informed choices based on information at the point of sale including quality of service and performance statistics.
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3/type
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
New
Committee report tabled for plenary
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19950213&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=19950213&type=CRE
events/5/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Decision by Parliament
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 142
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 132
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
rapporteur
name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio date: 1994-09-01T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
1994-09-01T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: KATIFORIS Giorgos date: 1994-10-04T00:00:00 group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy
committee
ECON
date
1994-10-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KATIFORIS Giorgos group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Research, Technological Development and Energy
committee
ENER
rapporteur
name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael date: 1994-10-13T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Research, Technological Development and Energy
committee
ENER
date
1994-10-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
activities
  • date: 1994-06-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1994&nu_doc=218 title: COM(1994)0218 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:51994DC0218:EN body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 1994-09-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 1994-10-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PSE name: KATIFORIS Giorgos body: EP responsible: False committee: ENER date: 1994-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 1994-09-01T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 1994-10-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PSE name: KATIFORIS Giorgos body: EP responsible: False committee: ENER date: 1994-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 1994-09-01T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio docs: type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A4-0012/1995 date: 1995-01-30T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 1995-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19950213&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1995-02-14T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T4-0033/1995 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 1995-03-06T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
1994-09-01T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ECON
date
1994-10-04T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy
rapporteur
group: PSE name: KATIFORIS Giorgos
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy
committee
ECON
date
1994-10-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KATIFORIS Giorgos group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ENER
date
1994-10-13T00:00:00
committee_full
ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy
rapporteur
group: PPE name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Research, Technological Development and Energy
committee
ENER
date
1994-10-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection
committee
ENVI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
TRAN
date
1994-09-01T00:00:00
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
rapporteur
group: PPE name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio
docs
  • date: 1994-12-01T00:00:00 docs: title: PE210.854/DEF committee: ECON type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 1994-12-01T00:00:00 docs: title: PE210.284/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 1994-12-08T00:00:00 docs: title: PE210.923/DEF committee: ENER type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 1995-01-30T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:056:TOC title: OJ C 056 06.03.1995, p. 0004 title: A4-0012/1995 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-02-07T00:00:00 docs: title: PE210.284 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 1995-02-14T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:056:TOC title: OJ C 056 06.03.1995, p. 0022-0028 title: T4-0033/1995 summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, single reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-02-22T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0190)(documentyear:1995)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES0190/1995 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:110:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 110 02.05.1995, p. 0022 summary: While agreeing with the views of the Commission, which stated that ‘it is firmly convinced that the European aviation industry will re-achieve sustainable growth and profitability only if, in addition to the management task of restructuring carriers which need to be supported by enforcing the Third Package provisions, public authorities work towards a quick solution to the extra burden caused by inadequate diversity of standards, allocation of responsibilities and other rigidities’, the ESC considered that the Commission’s overall response was inadequate to meet the challenge of working in a ‘consumer-driven market’. It believed that, in particular, the Commission and the Member States should work to ensure existing legislation operated to meet their objectives and that the problems of both inadequate airport capacity and air-traffic management systems were addressed vigorously. The ESC believed in particular that: - the Commission should ensure that State aid was limited to reconstruction and to where a public service obligation was established, and did not prejudice the workings of the internal market (see section 3.7); - the Commission should work with the Council on a common external policy on the basis of Article 84 (see section 3.8). With air transport evolving against a background of worldwide competition, the failure to give priority to the framing of an external EU policy would have a harmful effect not only in terms of obtaining and maintaining routes but also in the context of the social sector (emergence of social dumping); - more detailed attention needed to be given to the issue of safety (see section 3.9.); - the Commission should give urgent consideration to the high airport and en route charges. As the Wise Men’s report stated, ‘the European region suffers from extraordinary high user charges’ (see section 3.10.). The charges airports made direct to scheduled European airlines represented 4 to 6% of operating costs, compared with less than 2% in the United States . This relative difference had even more impact on ATC charges where no en-route charge existed for domestic US traffic; - the Commission was equivocal on taxation and financing issues. There should be a clear statement that no extra tax burdens on the industry would be proposed; - the recommendations relating to social issues were too vague: detailed proposals were needed notably on the need to ensure workers could adapt to changing market conditions and also the need to safeguard and harmonise the quality of employment and working conditions in accordance with the principle of social progress enshrined in Articles 2 and 117 of the Treaty. In any event, the issue was treated as almost an afterthought (see section 3.16.). The Economic and Social Committee felt that the liberalisation process had been underway long enough to allow a first report to be drawn up on its social impact, especially its effect on employment and working conditions. This would make it possible to pinpoint any adverse effects and to examine how these could be corrected; - the Commission should take into account that a ‘consumer-driven market’ was more than one in which fares were related to costs. It should also be one in which customers individually were enabled to make properly informed choices based on information at the point of sale including quality of service and performance statistics. type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
events
  • date: 1994-06-01T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1994&nu_doc=218 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(1994)0218 summary:
  • date: 1994-09-14T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-01-30T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 1995-01-30T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: title: A4-0012/1995
  • date: 1995-02-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19950213&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1995-02-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: title: T4-0033/1995 summary:
  • date: 1995-02-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 1995-03-06T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    TRAN/3/05621
    New
    • TRAN/3/05621
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 132
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 132
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 3.20.01 Air transport and air freight
    New
    3.20.01
    Air transport and air freight
    activities
    • date: 1994-06-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1994&nu_doc=218 title: COM(1994)0218 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:51994DC0218:EN body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
    • date: 1994-09-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 1994-10-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PSE name: KATIFORIS Giorgos body: EP responsible: False committee: ENER date: 1994-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 1994-09-01T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio
    • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 1994-10-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PSE name: KATIFORIS Giorgos body: EP responsible: False committee: ENER date: 1994-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 1994-09-01T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio docs: type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A4-0012/1995 date: 1995-01-30T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 1995-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19950213&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 1995-02-14T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T4-0033/1995 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 1995-03-06T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 1994-10-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PSE name: KATIFORIS Giorgos
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: ENER date: 1994-10-13T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection committee: ENVI
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 1994-09-01T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      TRAN/3/05621
      reference
      1994/2079(COS)
      title
      The way forward for civil aviation in Europe
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 132
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Commission strategy paper
      type
      COS - Procedure on a strategy paper (historic)
      subject
      3.20.01 Air transport and air freight