BETA


1997/0916(CNS) Fight against organized crime: exchanges, training and cooperation. 1998-2002 FALCONE programme

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead LIBE ORLANDO Leoluca (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion BUDG
Committee Opinion CONT
Committee Opinion JURI NASSAUER Hartmut (icon: PPE PPE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC before Amsterdam E 000

Events

2006/03/07
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

This Commission staff working document consists of a report on the ex post evaluation of Grotius II, Oisin II, Stop II, Falcone and Hippokrates Programmes and the interim evaluation of the AGIS Programme.

To recall, since January 2003, the five former Programmes established under Title VI (Grotius, Oisin, Stop, Falcone and Hippokrates), that ran from 1996 until 2002, were brought together into a single Programme - the AGIS Framework Programme (2003-2007).

The main objectives of this document are as follows:

to present a summary of the main results and conclusions of this evaluation; to assess the main recommendations; to present concrete proposals for the next programming period and, notably, to draw conclusions relevant to the implementation of the Programmes that are to replace the AGIS Programme.

The Commission has already presented to the Council and the European Parliament proposals for Programmes to replace the AGIS Programme (the Security Programme and, to some extent, the Justice Programme) in the next programming period. It must be underlined that the recommendations both general and specific that are discussed in this paper can be fully implemented under the new legal framework.

As regards the former Title VI Programmes, the ex post evaluation was centred on the last 2 years of implementation – 2001 and 2002. The evaluation exercise therefore focused on STOP II, Oisin II and Grotius II, which are the so-called second generation of Programmes, as well as in Hippokrates (2001/2002) and Falcone (2001/2002).

In the case of the interim evaluation of the AGIS Programme, the analysis focused on the 2 first years of implementation – 2003 and 2004 , where a majority of grant-aided projects was still ongoing.

In geographical terms, the study covered all the countries that participated in the Programme - Member States (then 15), candidate countries (now the new 10 Member States) and third countries.

The main overall conclusions of the evaluation are as follows:

the former Title VI programmes as well as the AGIS programme have been useful programmes that have made a very positive contribution to increasing knowledge, understanding and trust among target groups, which are crucial factors for increasing cross-national co-operation in the area, and ultimately to creating an area of justice, freedom and security; all programmes have led to the implementation of effective projects that in most cases would not have existed without the financial support of the programmes, or would have existed in a different format, where less focus would have been on the transnational aspects. While most stakeholders recognise the need and the benefits arising from transnational co-operation projects, there are few alternative funding opportunities that allow similar projects to take place; the transnational element is strong in most of the projects that have been implemented. It has, however, been more predominant or better integrated under the AGIS programme, as compared to the former Title VI programmes. The main explanation for this could be the strengthened requirements concerning partnerships; the programmes have led to the creation and strengthening of many formal and informal networks and this can be said to be one of their main merits. For the former Title VI programmes, it can be concluded that sustainable benefits do arise from these networks and that networks are generally found to be useful beyond the scope and lifetime of projects. the programmes were generally not found to be demand driven, in the sense that policy priorities and objectives do not determine the portfolio of projects. Objectives are broad and not clearly prioritised, allowing applicants to claim that most of their ideas match the programme objectives. Rather than being EU demand driven, most projects are thus supply driven, resulting from the specific interest of possible promoters; related to the previous point, Member States (programme committees) generally play a limited role in the formulation of specific objectives for annual work programmes, despite a specific AGIS Committee meeting every year being devoted to an examination of the annual work programme. Instead, the role of Member States’ representatives in the committees is mainly found to be as advocates for national interests in the selection of particular projects.

The report concludes that the aim of the external evaluation and, even more so, of this paper is to feed into the implementation of the remainder of the AGIS Programme as well as the new programmes after 2006. The proposals from the Commission for new programmes from 2007 are compatible with the conclusions and recommendations of this document, as the former set quite a broad legislative framework and the latter pertain more to the policy use of the programmes and their implementation mechanisms.

As concerns the specific recommendations on implementing mechanisms, there is no doubt that they have to be applied during the next programming period.

Furthermore, the selection criteria for objectives and priority areas for the funding programmes need to be defined and agreed by all involved in the management of the programme. It is clear that founding documents, such as the Hague Programme and Action Plan, provide commonly agreed overall political objectives, which then need to be translated into concrete milestones for programme implementation. It is suggested that this is an iterative process between the Commission and the relevant management structures of the programmes, once views from relevant stakeholders have been collected and integrated.

In conclusion, all-embracing programmes as they currently exist would give way to much more specific ones, with outcomes, results and eventually impacts being more systematically disseminated and monitored.

2003/03/14
   EC - Follow-up document
2001/01/08
   EC - Follow-up document
1999/12/17
   EC - Follow-up document
1998/03/31
   Final act published in Official Journal
1998/03/19
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
1998/03/19
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
1998/03/19
   CSL - Council Meeting
1998/02/17
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
1998/02/17
   EP - Debate in Parliament
1998/02/17
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Documents
1998/01/19
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
1998/01/19
   EP - Vote in committee
1998/01/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
1997/12/04
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
1997/12/04
   CSL - Council Meeting
1997/11/27
   EP - NASSAUER Hartmut (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
1997/11/17
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
1997/10/20
   EC - Legislative proposal
1997/10/19
   EC - Legislative proposal published
1997/09/15
   EP - ORLANDO Leoluca (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
1997-10-20T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/0
date
1997-12-04T00:00:00
docs
title: PE224.895
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/1
date
1998-01-12T00:00:00
docs
title: PE224.895/AM
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/6
date
2006-03-07T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0333/COM_SEC(2006)0333_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0333/COM_SEC(2006)0333_EN.pdf
docs/7
date
2006-03-07T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
events/0/date
Old
1997-10-20T00:00:00
New
1997-10-19T00:00:00
events/4/date
Old
1998-01-19T00:00:00
New
1998-01-18T00:00:00
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1998-0017_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1998-0017_EN.html
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0333/COM_SEC(2006)0333_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0333/COM_SEC(2006)0333_EN.pdf
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1998-0017_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1998-0017_EN.html
events/5/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-4-1997-02-17-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
events/6/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Decision by Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: ORLANDO Leoluca date: 1997-09-15T00:00:00 group: Green Group in the European Parliament abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
1997-09-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ORLANDO Leoluca group: Green Group in the European Parliament abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1/date
    committees/2
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights
    committee
    JURI
    rapporteur
    name: NASSAUER Hartmut date: 1997-11-27T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
    committees/2
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights
    committee
    JURI
    date
    1997-11-27T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: NASSAUER Hartmut group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
    docs/2/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1998-17&language=EN
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1998-0017_EN.html
    docs/6/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2003/0316/COM_SEC(2003)0316_EN.pdf
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2003/0316/COM_SEC(2003)0316_EN.pdf
    events/4/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1998-17&language=EN
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1998-0017_EN.html
    activities
    • date: 1997-10-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1997&nu_doc=528 title: COM(1997)0528 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:51997PC0528:EN body: EC commission: type: Legislative proposal published
    • date: 1997-11-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 1997-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights rapporteur: group: PPE name: NASSAUER Hartmut body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 1997-09-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs rapporteur: group: V name: ORLANDO Leoluca
    • body: CSL meeting_id: 2055 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2055*&MEET_DATE=04/12/1997 type: Debate in Council title: 2055 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 1997-12-04T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
    • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 1997-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights rapporteur: group: PPE name: NASSAUER Hartmut body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 1997-09-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs rapporteur: group: V name: ORLANDO Leoluca docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1998-17&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A4-0017/1998 date: 1998-01-19T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 1998-02-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate in Parliament docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T4-0063/1998
    • date: 1998-03-19T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2075
    • date: 1998-03-19T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
    • date: 1998-03-19T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
    • date: 1998-03-31T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
    committees/0
    type
    Responsible Committee
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs
    committee
    LIBE
    date
    1997-09-15T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: ORLANDO Leoluca group: Green Group in the European Parliament abbr: Verts/ALE
    committees/0
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Budgets
    committee
    BUDG
    committees/1
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Budgets
    committee
    BUDG
    date
    committees/1
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Budgetary Control
    committee
    CONT
    committees/2
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights
    committee
    JURI
    date
    1997-11-27T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: NASSAUER Hartmut group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
    committees/2
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee
    JURI
    date
    1997-11-27T00:00:00
    committee_full
    Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights
    rapporteur
    group: PPE name: NASSAUER Hartmut
    committees/3
    type
    Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Budgetary Control
    committee
    CONT
    opinion
    False
    committees/3
    body
    EP
    responsible
    True
    committee
    LIBE
    date
    1997-09-15T00:00:00
    committee_full
    Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs
    rapporteur
    group: V name: ORLANDO Leoluca
    council
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2075 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2075*&MEET_DATE=19/03/1998 date: 1998-03-19T00:00:00
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2055 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2055*&MEET_DATE=04/12/1997 date: 1997-12-04T00:00:00
    docs
    • date: 1997-12-04T00:00:00 docs: title: PE224.895 type: Committee draft report body: EP
    • date: 1998-01-12T00:00:00 docs: title: PE224.895/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
    • date: 1998-01-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1998-17&language=EN title: A4-0017/1998 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1998:056:TOC title: OJ C 056 23.02.1998, p. 0003 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
    • date: 1998-02-17T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1998:080:TOC title: OJ C 080 16.03.1998, p. 0016-0036 title: T4-0063/1998 summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
    • date: 1999-12-17T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=1999&nu_doc=1955 title: EUR-Lex title: SEC(1999)1955 type: Follow-up document body: EC
    • date: 2001-01-08T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2001&nu_doc=18 title: EUR-Lex title: SEC(2001)0018 type: Follow-up document body: EC
    • date: 2003-03-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2003/0316/COM_SEC(2003)0316_EN.pdf title: SEC(2003)0316 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2003&nu_doc=316 title: EUR-Lex type: Follow-up document body: EC
    • date: 2006-03-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0333/COM_SEC(2006)0333_EN.pdf title: SEC(2006)0333 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=333 title: EUR-Lex summary: This Commission staff working document consists of a report on the ex post evaluation of Grotius II, Oisin II, Stop II, Falcone and Hippokrates Programmes and the interim evaluation of the AGIS Programme. To recall, since January 2003, the five former Programmes established under Title VI (Grotius, Oisin, Stop, Falcone and Hippokrates), that ran from 1996 until 2002, were brought together into a single Programme - the AGIS Framework Programme (2003-2007). The main objectives of this document are as follows: to present a summary of the main results and conclusions of this evaluation; to assess the main recommendations; to present concrete proposals for the next programming period and, notably, to draw conclusions relevant to the implementation of the Programmes that are to replace the AGIS Programme. The Commission has already presented to the Council and the European Parliament proposals for Programmes to replace the AGIS Programme (the Security Programme and, to some extent, the Justice Programme) in the next programming period. It must be underlined that the recommendations both general and specific that are discussed in this paper can be fully implemented under the new legal framework. As regards the former Title VI Programmes, the ex post evaluation was centred on the last 2 years of implementation – 2001 and 2002. The evaluation exercise therefore focused on STOP II, Oisin II and Grotius II, which are the so-called second generation of Programmes, as well as in Hippokrates (2001/2002) and Falcone (2001/2002). In the case of the interim evaluation of the AGIS Programme, the analysis focused on the 2 first years of implementation – 2003 and 2004 , where a majority of grant-aided projects was still ongoing. In geographical terms, the study covered all the countries that participated in the Programme - Member States (then 15), candidate countries (now the new 10 Member States) and third countries. The main overall conclusions of the evaluation are as follows: the former Title VI programmes as well as the AGIS programme have been useful programmes that have made a very positive contribution to increasing knowledge, understanding and trust among target groups, which are crucial factors for increasing cross-national co-operation in the area, and ultimately to creating an area of justice, freedom and security; all programmes have led to the implementation of effective projects that in most cases would not have existed without the financial support of the programmes, or would have existed in a different format, where less focus would have been on the transnational aspects. While most stakeholders recognise the need and the benefits arising from transnational co-operation projects, there are few alternative funding opportunities that allow similar projects to take place; the transnational element is strong in most of the projects that have been implemented. It has, however, been more predominant or better integrated under the AGIS programme, as compared to the former Title VI programmes. The main explanation for this could be the strengthened requirements concerning partnerships; the programmes have led to the creation and strengthening of many formal and informal networks and this can be said to be one of their main merits. For the former Title VI programmes, it can be concluded that sustainable benefits do arise from these networks and that networks are generally found to be useful beyond the scope and lifetime of projects. the programmes were generally not found to be demand driven, in the sense that policy priorities and objectives do not determine the portfolio of projects. Objectives are broad and not clearly prioritised, allowing applicants to claim that most of their ideas match the programme objectives. Rather than being EU demand driven, most projects are thus supply driven, resulting from the specific interest of possible promoters; related to the previous point, Member States (programme committees) generally play a limited role in the formulation of specific objectives for annual work programmes, despite a specific AGIS Committee meeting every year being devoted to an examination of the annual work programme. Instead, the role of Member States’ representatives in the committees is mainly found to be as advocates for national interests in the selection of particular projects. The report concludes that the aim of the external evaluation and, even more so, of this paper is to feed into the implementation of the remainder of the AGIS Programme as well as the new programmes after 2006. The proposals from the Commission for new programmes from 2007 are compatible with the conclusions and recommendations of this document, as the former set quite a broad legislative framework and the latter pertain more to the policy use of the programmes and their implementation mechanisms. As concerns the specific recommendations on implementing mechanisms, there is no doubt that they have to be applied during the next programming period. Furthermore, the selection criteria for objectives and priority areas for the funding programmes need to be defined and agreed by all involved in the management of the programme. It is clear that founding documents, such as the Hague Programme and Action Plan, provide commonly agreed overall political objectives, which then need to be translated into concrete milestones for programme implementation. It is suggested that this is an iterative process between the Commission and the relevant management structures of the programmes, once views from relevant stakeholders have been collected and integrated. In conclusion, all-embracing programmes as they currently exist would give way to much more specific ones, with outcomes, results and eventually impacts being more systematically disseminated and monitored. type: Follow-up document body: EC
    events
    • date: 1997-10-20T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1997&nu_doc=528 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(1997)0528 summary:
    • date: 1997-11-17T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
    • date: 1997-12-04T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2055*&MEET_DATE=04/12/1997 title: 2055
    • date: 1998-01-19T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
    • date: 1998-01-19T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1998-17&language=EN title: A4-0017/1998
    • date: 1998-02-17T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP
    • date: 1998-02-17T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: title: T4-0063/1998 summary:
    • date: 1998-03-19T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament body: EP/CSL
    • date: 1998-03-19T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    • date: 1998-03-31T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
    links
    other
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    LIBE/4/09500
    New
    • LIBE/4/09500
    procedure/final/title
    Old
    OJ L 099 31.03.1998, p. 0008-0012
    New
    OJ L 099 31.03.1998, p. 0008-0012
    procedure/final/url
    Old
    http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:1998:099:TOC
    New
    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:1998:099:TOC
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 7.30.30 Action to combat crime
    New
    7.30.30
    Action to combat crime
    activities
    • date: 1997-10-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1997&nu_doc=528 title: COM(1997)0528 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:51997PC0528:EN body: EC commission: type: Legislative proposal published
    • date: 1997-11-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 1997-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights rapporteur: group: PPE name: NASSAUER Hartmut body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 1997-09-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs rapporteur: group: V name: ORLANDO Leoluca
    • body: CSL meeting_id: 2055 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2055*&MEET_DATE=04/12/1997 type: Debate in Council title: 2055 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 1997-12-04T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
    • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 1997-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights rapporteur: group: PPE name: NASSAUER Hartmut body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 1997-09-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs rapporteur: group: V name: ORLANDO Leoluca docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1998-17&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A4-0017/1998 date: 1998-01-19T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 1998-02-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate in Parliament docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T4-0063/1998
    • date: 1998-03-19T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2075
    • date: 1998-03-19T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
    • date: 1998-03-19T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
    • date: 1998-03-31T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 1997-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights rapporteur: group: PPE name: NASSAUER Hartmut
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 1997-09-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs rapporteur: group: V name: ORLANDO Leoluca
    links
    other
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
    procedure
    dossier_of_the_committee
    LIBE/4/09500
    reference
    1997/0916(CNS)
    subtype
    Legislation
    legal_basis
    EC before Amsterdam E 000
    stage_reached
    Procedure completed
    instrument
    Decision
    title
    Fight against organized crime: exchanges, training and cooperation. 1998-2002 FALCONE programme
    type
    CNS - Consultation procedure
    final
    subject
    7.30.30 Action to combat crime