BETA


2000/0030(CNS) Third countries whose nationals are subject to or exempt from a visa requirement (Visa Regulation)

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead LIBE LEHNE Klaus-Heiner (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Former Responsible Committee LIBE LEHNE Klaus-Heiner (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Former Committee Opinion AFET
Former Committee Opinion JURI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 062

Events

2017/12/20
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

This Commission communication addresses the state of play and possible ways forward as regards the situation of non-reciprocity with certain third countries in the area of visa policy and assessment of the effectiveness of the reciprocity mechanism provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001.

Background : the reciprocity mechanism established by Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 as amended by Regulation (EU) No 1289/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, aims to ensure that EU citizens are subject to the same conditions when travelling to a third country as nationals of that third country are when travelling to the EU.

The reciprocity mechanism sets out a procedure starting with a situation of non-reciprocity with precise timeframes and actions to be taken with a view to ending a situation of non-reciprocity.

In a communication presented in April 2016, the Commission indicated that the vast majority of notified non-reciprocity cases involving eight third countries had been resolved. However, the communication recalled that, if the third country concerned had not lifted the visa requirement by 12 April 2016 under the reciprocity mechanism, the Commission was required to adopt a delegated act suspending for 12 months the visa exemption for nationals of that third country.

The European Parliament’s resolution of 2 March 2017 on the Commission's visa reciprocity obligations invited the Commission to adopt a delegated act temporarily suspending the exemption from the visa requirement for nationals of third countries which have not lifted the visa requirement for citizens of certain Member States – within a period of 24 months from the date of publication of the notifications in this regard.

In its follow-up communication of May 2017, the Commission defined its position following the European Parliament resolution. It considered that, in view of the progress made during the previous 12 months and of the work in progress, the adoption of a delegated act temporarily suspending the exemption from the visa requirement for nationals of Canada and the United States would have been counterproductive at that moment.

At the same time, the Commission committed to continue working closely with both the European Parliament and the Council, with Canada, the United States as well as with the Member States concerned to accelerate progress towards full visa reciprocity, and to report on the developments by the end of December 2017.

This Communication takes stock of progress achieved in this area since May 2017 in discussions with Canada and the United States , and reports that full visa reciprocity with Canada has now been achieved.

Recent developments and way ahead : the Commission welcomes that, in line with its earlier commitment, on 1 December 2017, Canada lifted the visa requirement for all Bulgarian and Romanian citizens . Full visa reciprocity has thus been achieved with Canada.

The Commission will continue to urge the United States to further cooperate, in the spirit of the Joint Statement adopted in June 2017, with the five Member States concerned and the Commission to accelerate progress towards full visa reciprocity. This should lead to intensified and concrete action on all sides. The Joint Statement confirmed commitments, such as preserving and expanding visa-free travel between the EU and the United States and stepping up efforts to improve cooperation with a view to assist Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Poland and Romania in advancing more rapidly towards the fulfilment of the requirements for the Visa Waiver Program.

The Commission also continues to consider that the adoption of a delegated act temporarily suspending the visa waiver for U.S. citizens would be counterproductive at this moment and would not serve to achieve the objective of visa-free travel for all EU citizens to the United States.

Assessment on effectiveness of the reciprocity mechanism : the Commission recognises the progress achieved since the adoption of the revised mechanism . Although this progress cannot solely be attributed to the mechanism, it does establish an instrument that allows for collective and coordinated EU action in non-reciprocity cases, and it is considered to have proven to be a useful tool towards some third countries.

Despite some procedural shortcomings, the mechanism has helped resolve the vast majority of cases of non-reciprocity over the past two and a half years. At this point in time, the Commission is not considering to bring forward a legislative proposal for the revision of the mechanism .

The Commission remains committed to working closely with the European Parliament and the Council on the way forward. It will report on the further developments to the European Parliament and the Council at the latest by autumn 2018.

2010/11/05
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001, listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of the Member States (Annex 1 to the Regulation, the "negative list") and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Annex II to the Regulation, the "positive list"), is the basic instrument of our common visa policy, providing a reciprocity mechanism for cases where a third country on the positive list maintains or introduces a visa requirement for the citizens of one or more Member States.

The first four reports showed gradual progress achieved in solving non-reciprocity issues. The fifth visa reciprocity report of 19 October 2009 showed that only five third countries on the positive list still continued to require visas from citizens of one or more Member States.

On the same date, the Commission adopted an ad-hoc report on the re-imposition of the visa requirement by Canada for Czech citizens. For the first time a third country on the positive list had re-imposed a visa requirement for citizens of a Member State since the introduction of the new visa reciprocity mechanism in 2005. The Commission concluded that unless Canada were to take positive steps towards facilitating formalities for Czech citizens wishing to visit Canada and setting out a path of measures towards the restoration of visa-free travel for them by the end of 2009, the Commission would recommend imposing or re-imposing a visa requirement for certain categories of Canadian citizens.

The present sixth visa reciprocity report takes stock of the results of the efforts made since 19 October 2009.

Main conclusions : the implementation of the new visa reciprocity mechanism established in 2005 through Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005 can be considered as satisfactory.

Australia and Japan now provide equal treatment of citizens of all Member States but final determination of full visa reciprocity awaits respectively further assessment of the eVisitor system and the permanent visa waiver for Romania.

With Brazil the European Union will sign very soon two visa waiver agreements – one on ordinary passport holders, the other on holders of diplomatic, service or official passports – which will ensure visa reciprocity. The Commission will endeavour an early ratification of these agreements by the European Union and monitor ratification by the Brazilian side.

Only a very limited number of "non reciprocity" cases subsist, two of which have specific characteristics:

Brunei-Darussalam grants all EU citizens a visa waiver, but it is valid only for 30 days, renewable twice for 30 days; the Commission will continue efforts to establish full reciprocity although the current situation does not lead to problems for EU citizens; Canada has re-introduced the visa requirement for Czech citizens, in 2010 Canada has adopted a reform of its asylum system and agreed to review the visa regime with the Czech Republic before the new Canadian asylum legislation is implemented in the end of 2011. The Czech Republic is fully cooperating with Canada on agreed path of measures supporting this process. The steps indicated by Canada with a goal to review the visa regime with the Czech Republic will be closely monitored by the Commission, in particular, the prompt and appropriate follow-up by Canada of its data-gathering mission to the Czech Republic expected to take place before the end of 2010. In case of a positive assessment the Commission expects Canada to lift visa obligation for Czech citizens. When addressing the other remaining cases of non-reciprocity, i.e. as regards the U.S . (visa requirement for Bulgaria, Cyprus, Romania and Poland) and Canada (visa requirement for Bulgaria and Romania), the EU is confronted with the limits of its reciprocity mechanism as set out in the current acquis . In these cases indeed Member States are considered by third countries not to meet objective criteria for visa waiver set out unilaterally by these third countries in their domestic legislation (e.g. not issuing biometric passports, not meeting thresholds set for visa refusal and/or overstay rates).

The Commission will continue to raise these issues at all relevant occasions and in all appropriate fora with the third countries concerned. At the same time, the Commission invites the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States to reflect on how to further address these cases of non-reciprocity.

2009/10/19
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001, listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of the Member States (Annex 1 to the Regulation, the "negative list") and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Annex II to the Regulation, the "positive list"), as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005, is the basic instrument of our common visa policy, providing a reciprocity mechanism for cases where a third country on the positive list maintains or introduces a visa requirement for the citizens of one or more Member States.

The previous reports provided a description of the reciprocity mechanism and the state of play of non-reciprocity during the respective periods covered.

The notifications by Member States in the framework of the new reciprocity mechanism showed that by June 2005 13 third countries were notified with 75 cases in total. Following their accession to the European Union on 1 January 2007, Bulgaria and Romania notified seven third countries with which a situation of non-reciprocity was in place.

The 4 th visa reciprocity report of July 2008 showed that a situation of non-reciprocity still existed with eight third countries from the positive list. The report was presented to the JHA Council on 24 July 2008 and was well received by Member States. Member States were generally optimistic in achieving full visa reciprocity.

The present 5 th reciprocity report takes stock of the efforts made by the Commission since July 2008. As detailed below, full visa reciprocity has been achieved with three additional third countries while five third countries on the positive list continue to require visas from nationals of one or more Member States.

Conclusions : the Commission considers that since the last report of 23 July 2008, the new visa reciprocity mechanism has once more proved to be effective. Out of the eight third countries on the positive list which required visas from citizens of one or more Member States at the time of the previous report, only five third countries now continue to do so. Full visa reciprocity has been achieved with Japan , Panama and Singapore .

Furthermore, significant progress has been achieved with Australia and the U.S. Regarding Australia, the introduction of the eVisitors system has brought about equal treatment of the citizens of all Member States and Schengen associated countries. The Commission will be in a position to determine whether full visa reciprocity has been achieved only once the assessment of the eVisitors system has been completed.

As regards the U.S , seven additional Member States have joined the VWP. Nevertheless, the situation is still far from satisfactory and the Commission will pursue discussions with the U.S. in order to secure early inclusion of the remaining five Member States in the VWP. With regard to the U.S. ESTA, the Commission deplores the passage of legislation introducing a fee for the use of the ESTA for the benefit of the U.S. travel and tourism industry . This tax on foreigners would be a retrograde and counter-productive step and could lead to the determination that the ESTA is tantamount to the Schengen visa application process with very serious potential consequences for U.S. travellers to Europe.

With regard to Brunei Darussalam , the Commission will closely follow the internal discussions in Brunei Darussalam and continue consultations with Brunei Darussalam authorities in order to achieve a 90 day visa waiver for all Member States.

Regarding Brazil , the Commission welcomes the agreement reached on the draft text of the short-stay visa waiver agreement for holders of ordinary passports and expects to achieve an agreement soon on the short-stay visa waiver agreement for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports. The Commission hopes that Brazil will be able to ratify both agreements through their internal procedures as soon as possible.

Regarding Canada , the Commission will continue to pursue discussions with Canada in order to achieve progress towards the lifting of the visa requirements for Bulgaria and Romania.

In accordance with Article 1(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005, the Commission will again report to the Council and the European Parliament no later than 30 June 2010 .

2009/10/19
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The Commission presents a special report to the Council on the re-introduction of the visa requirement by Canada for citizens of the Czech Republic.

On 14 July 2009, in accordance with Article 1(4)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005, the Czech Republic has notified the Commission and the Council that as of 14 July 2009 Canada unilaterally applies the visa regime to nationals of the Czech Republic . This notification has been published in the Official Journal on 6 August 2009, which means that in accordance with Article 1(4)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005, the Commission shall report to the Council within 90 days from this date of publication; therefore, by 6 November 2009.

This report takes stock of the steps taken by the Commission following this notification.

The reimposition of the visa requirement of 14 July 2009 : Canada had lifted the visa requirement for nationals of the Czech Republic on 31 October 2007. On 13 July 2009, the Canadian authorities informed the Czech authorities through several channels, including a formal Diplomatic Note, that the visa requirement would be reintroduced for Czech nationals as from the next day. On the same day Canada also introduced the visa requirement for Mexican nationals. Also in this case, the main reason was the large number of refugee claims from Mexico, making it the number one source country for refugee claims in Canada.

The rising numbers of Czech refugee claimants – most of them are of Roma origin – in Canada has been discussed repeatedly at meetings between Canadian and Czech authorities since the lifting of the visa requirement on 1 November 2007, and in particular in the run-up to the reintroduction of the visa requirement on 14 July 2009.

Steps taken after the reimposition of the visa requirement : on 20 July 2009, the Czech Republic notified the Commission and the Council that, in accordance with Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001, the Czech Republic has imposed the visa requirement for holders of Canadian diplomatic and service passports as from 16 July 2009 .

Following the reintroduction of the visa requirement, the Commission consulted both the Czech and Canadian authorities regularly on the issue. Furthermore, the Commission accompanied a Czech delegation for consultations with Canadian authorities in Ottawa on 10 September 2009. In addition, the issue was discussed at the EU-Canada Ministerial Troika in Ottawa on 1 October 2009.

Assessement : this is the first time that a third country has re-imposed a visa requirement for citizens of a Member State. The Commission considers that this highly regrettable situation should be brought to an end as soon as possible. Canada is aware that the European Union's common visa policy is based on the principle of reciprocity. It is particularly unsatisfactory that Czech citizens are not able to obtain visas at the Canadian embassy in Prague. The Commission acknowledges that Canada provides several visa process facilitations to Czech citizens in the Czech Republic but calls upon Canada to return to the previous situation regarding the visa issuance process for Czech citizens by reinstating visa issuing facilities in the Czech Republic.

The Commission welcomes the willingness of all sides to engage in a dialogue and encourages Canada and the Czech Republic to continue their consultations in the framework of a Canada-Czech Republic Experts Working Group to address all issues in relation to the re-imposition of the visa requirement; e.g. for Canada to clarify its asylum system and the immigration violations by Czech travellers, and for the Czech Republic to clarify the implementation of its programmes and policies regarding minorities and in particular Roma communities. The Commission calls upon Canada to set out clearly a path of measures it intends to take to lift the visa requirement for Czech citizens in the near future.

The Commission notes that the Czech Republic has decided to require visas for holders of Canadian diplomatic and service passports. Unless the measures mentioned in the previous paragraphs are established, in a satisfactory manner, by the end of 2009 the Commission will recommend imposing or re-imposing a visa requirement for certain categories of Canadian citizens (holders of diplomatic and service passports).

Conclusions : although Canada provides several visa process facilitations to Czech citizens in the Czech Republic, pending restoration of visa-free travel for Czech citizens the Commission calls upon Canada to return to the previous state regarding the visa issuance process for Czech citizens by reinstating visa issuing facilities in the Czech Republic. The Commission encourages Canada and the Czech Republic to continue their consultations in the framework of a Canada-Czech Republic Experts Working Group to address all issues in relation to the re-imposition of the visa requirement, and reiterates its readiness to facilitate and participate in those discussions. The Commission calls upon Canada to set out clearly the measures it intends to take to lift the visa requirement for Czech citizens in the near future. Furthermore the Commission will recommend imposing or re-imposing a visa requirement for certain categories of Canadian citizens, unless Canada takes positive steps towards facilitating formalities for Czech citizens wishing to visit Canada and setting out a path towards the restoration of visa-free travel for them.

2008/07/23
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of the Member States (Annex I to the Regulation, the “negative list”) and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Annex II to the Regulation, the “positive list”), as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005, is the basic instrument of common visa policy, providing also a reciprocity mechanism for cases where a third country on the positive list maintains or introduces a visa obligation for the citizens of one or more Member States.

In its third report in 2007 (refer to the follow-up document of the procedure file CNS/2004/0141 ), the Commission concluded that dialogue with third countries under the new reciprocity mechanism has proven effective. Full reciprocity was achieved with New Zealand and Mexico. Significant progress was achieved in dialogue with Australia. Furthermore, a comprehensive visa waiver agreement should soon be negotiated with Brazil. However, with regard to Canada and the United States of America (USA) it was concluded that little progress had been made. If this continued to be the case, appropriate retaliatory measures could be considered.

This fourth report takes stock of the approaches made by the Commission since September 2007 vis-à-vis third countries on the positive list which continue to require visas from nationals of one or more Member States.

The Commission considers that since the last report of 13 September 2007 the dialogue with third countries under the new reciprocity mechanism has once again proven effective. Further full visa reciprocity has been achieved with three third countries (Israel, Malaysia and Paraguay). Furthermore, the Commission has achieved significant progress in the dialogue with Canada, for which only Bulgaria and Romania remain under the visa obligation. In the dialogue with Australia the Commission has achieved access for all Member States to the "autogrant facility" and equal treatment for the nationals of all Member States from October 2008. Nevertheless, the implementation of the Australian eVisitors system will be monitored carefully. The negotiations for a short-stay visa waiver agreement between the European Community and Brazil have started, in order to achieve full visa reciprocity with Brazil.

No progress has been achieved with Japan, Panama, Singapore and the USA. On Singapore, the Commission regrets that a three month visa free stay for the citizens of the EU has not been granted, while Singaporean citizens enjoy a "three months within six months" visa-free stay in the EU. Furthermore the Commission observes that there is no indication that the visa waiver for the EU citizens will reach the level of the three countries enjoying a preferential treatment. (Australia, South Korea and the United States of America enjoy a preferential 90 day stay in Singapore. The Commission suggests that retaliatory measures should be introduced if within a reasonable time no full reciprocity has been achieved.

Regarding the USA , despite all efforts of the Commission and individual Member States and the promises by the USA to bring additional EU Member States in the VWP this year, no tangible progress has been made . The visa requirement is maintained for nationals of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Romania and Slovakia.

Therefore, the Commission will propose retaliatory measures e.g. temporary restoration of the visa requirement for U.S. nationals holding diplomatic and service/official passports – as from 1 January 2009 if no progress has been achieved. With regard to the U.S. ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization), the Commission will prepare a preliminary assessment on whether the travel authorization under the ESTA is tantamount to a visa requirement or not. It will publish a final assessment once the Final Rule is published in the Federal Register i.e. 60 days before its entry into force.

In view of the importance of achieving full reciprocity, the Commission hereby announces its intention to report to the European Parliament and Council again by not later than 30 June 2009, although formally, under Article 1(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005, it is not obliged to present such a report until 30 June 2010.

2006/10/03
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

PURPOSE: to present a report from the Commission on cases where visa waiver non-reciprocity is maintained by certain third countries.

CONTENT: Council Regulation 539/2001/EC of 15 March 2001 is at the heart of the common EU visa policy, listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of the Member States (Annex I to the Regulation, the “negative list”) and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Annex II to the Regulation, the “positive list”).

It was substantially modified by Regulation 851/2005/EC of 2 June 2005, which introduced a new reciprocity mechanism ( CNS/2004/0141 ). The aim of the new mechanism is to establish through appropriate measures reciprocity towards third countries still requiring a visa from citizens of certain Member States for stays of less than 90 days while the Community does not apply such visa requirements towards the citizens of those third countries.

Regulation 851/2005/EC allows the visa requirement to be introduced provisionally vis-à-vis the countries concerned. In addition, a joint declaration made by the Council and the Commission when Regulation 851/2005/EC was adopted refers to the possibility of taking other provisional measures, particularly in the political, economic and commercial fields.

Pursuant to Regulation 851/2005/EC and in the light of notifications by Member States of cases of non-reciprocity, the Commission on 10 January 2006 presented a report to the Council on visa waiver reciprocity with certain third countries (COM(2006)3). This report described the Commission’s approaches towards the countries on the positive list that continued to require a visa from Member State nationals and listed the results obtained.

In view of the progress achieved, the Commission concluded that there was no need at that stage to include with the report a proposal for temporary restoration of the visa requirement or for measures such as those contained in the Council and Commission joint declaration. However, for the purposes of the second report, the Commission stated that it would monitor whether the solutions announced by certain third countries had been put into practice and whether further dialogue with others had opened up the prospect of reciprocal visa-free travel.

In its conclusions of 21 February 2006, the Council endorsed the Commission’s analysis and urged it to strengthen its efforts with the United States, Canada and Australia and to monitor progress with the other third countries concerned.

With particular regard to Australia, Canada and the United States, the Commission organised a technical meeting on 23 March 2006 with representatives of the Member States concerned in order to assess the state of the dialogue between them and the three third countries in question and the results of the dialogue. That meeting took place in advance of the high-level contacts scheduled between the Commission and the authorities of the three countries over the following weeks.

Full reciprocity is now in place in Uruguay and Costa Rica. Steps are still being taken by Brazil and Malaysia with a view to achieving reciprocity. In Paraguay, Singapore and Brunei, the solution of the non-reciprocity problem has been announced but is yet to be put into practice.

Main conclusions : the Commission considers that the dialogue with third countries under the new reciprocity mechanism has already proven effective. The steady and significant fall in the number of “non-reciprocity situations” (cases where a third country maintains a visa requirement for nationals of a Member State) is a remarkable success in the Commission's opinion. However, progress remains stalled with one third country (United States) while the situation is evolving with regard to Australia, Canada and Brunei. The future developments with these countries will determine the reflection on the appropriate approach that would allow for further and concrete progress towards the realisation of reciprocity.

In view of the importance of achieving full reciprocity, the Commission hereby announces its intention to report to the European Parliament and Council again by not later than 31.03.2007 and to make, where appropriate, concrete proposals if the non-reciprocity situations persist, although formally, under Article 1(5) of the EC Regulation, it is not obliged to present such a report until 30.06.2008.

2001/03/21
   Final act published in Official Journal
2001/03/15
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
2001/03/15
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2001/03/15
   CSL - Council Meeting
2001/03/01
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament after reconsultation
2001/03/01
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Documents
2001/02/06
   EP - Committee final report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
Documents
2001/02/06
   EP - Vote in committee
2001/02/05
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
Documents
2000/12/11
   EP/CSL - Formal reconsultation of Parliament
2000/12/04
   CSL - Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation
Documents
2000/12/03
   EC - Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published
Documents
2000/11/30
   CSL - Council Meeting
2000/09/28
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2000/09/28
   CSL - Council Meeting
2000/09/21
   EC - Modified legislative proposal
2000/09/20
   EC - Modified legislative proposal published
2000/07/05
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2000/07/05
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Documents
2000/07/03
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2000/06/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
2000/06/21
   EP - Vote in committee
2000/06/20
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2000/04/11
   EP - LEHNE Klaus-Heiner (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2000/03/29
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2000/03/16
   EP - LEHNE Klaus-Heiner (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2000/01/26
   EC - Legislative proposal
2000/01/25
   EC - Legislative proposal published

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/1
date
2000-05-23T00:00:00
docs
title: PE285.924
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/2
date
2000-07-05T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/2
date
2000-06-07T00:00:00
docs
title: PE285.924/AM
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/2/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2001:121:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:121:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/4
date
2000-07-05T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/4
date
2000-12-04T00:00:00
docs
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=14191%2F00&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 14191/2000
summary
type
Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation
body
CSL
docs/6
date
2001-03-01T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament after reconsultation
body
EP
docs/6
date
2001-01-29T00:00:00
docs
title: PE294.262
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/6/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:277:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2001:277:TOC
docs/7
date
2001-01-29T00:00:00
docs
title: PE294.262/AM
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/9
date
2001-03-01T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament after reconsultation
body
EP
docs/9
date
2009-10-19T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/9/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0560/COM_COM(2009)0560_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0560/COM_COM(2009)0560_EN.pdf
docs/12
date
2009-10-19T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
events/0/date
Old
2000-01-26T00:00:00
New
2000-01-25T00:00:00
events/3/date
Old
2000-06-21T00:00:00
New
2000-06-20T00:00:00
events/6/date
Old
2000-09-21T00:00:00
New
2000-09-20T00:00:00
events/8/date
Old
2000-12-04T00:00:00
New
2000-12-03T00:00:00
events/11/date
Old
2001-02-06T00:00:00
New
2001-02-05T00:00:00
procedure/instrument/1
Repealing Regulation (EC) No 574/1999 1997/0922(CNS) Amended by 2001/0231(CNS) Amended by 2002/0280(CNS) Amended by 2004/0141(CNS) Amended by 2006/0022(CNS) Amended by 2009/0104(CNS) Amended by 2010/0137(COD) Amended by 2010/0192(COD) Amended by 2011/0051(COD) Amended by 2011/0138(COD) Amended by 2012/0309(COD) Amended by 2013/0415(COD) Amended by 2016/0075(COD) Amended by 2016/0125(COD) Amended by 2016/0139(COD) Amended by 2016/0142(COD) See also 2016/2986(RSP) Repealed by 2018/0066(COD) Amended by 2018/0390(COD)
procedure/instrument/1
Repealing Regulation (EC) No 574/1999 1997/0922(CNS) Amended by 2001/0231(CNS) Amended by 2002/0280(CNS) Amended by 2004/0141(CNS) Amended by 2006/0022(CNS) Amended by 2009/0104(CNS) Amended by 2010/0137(COD) Amended by 2010/0192(COD) Amended by 2011/0051(COD) Amended by 2011/0138(COD) Amended by 2012/0309(COD) Amended by 2013/0415(COD) Amended by 2016/0075(COD) Amended by 2016/0125(COD) Amended by 2016/0142(COD) See also 2016/2986(RSP) Repealed by 2018/0066(COD) Amended by 2018/0390(COD)
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2000-0179_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2000-0179_EN.html
docs/4
date
2000-07-05T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/4
date
2000-07-05T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0056_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0056_EN.html
docs/9
date
2001-03-01T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament after reconsultation
body
EP
docs/9
date
2001-03-01T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament after reconsultation
body
EP
docs/15
date
2017-12-20T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/15
date
2017-12-20T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2000-0179_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2000-0179_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20000703&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20000703&type=CRE
events/5
date
2000-07-05T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2000-0303_EN.html title: T5-0303/2000
summary
events/5
date
2000-07-05T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2000-0303_EN.html title: T5-0303/2000
summary
events/10/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/11/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0056_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0056_EN.html
events/12
date
2001-03-01T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2001-0109_EN.html title: T5-0109/2001
summary
events/12
date
2001-03-01T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2001-0109_EN.html title: T5-0109/2001
summary
procedure/instrument/1
Repealing Regulation (EC) No 574/1999 1997/0922(CNS) Amended by 2001/0231(CNS) Amended by 2002/0280(CNS) Amended by 2004/0141(CNS) Amended by 2006/0022(CNS) Amended by 2009/0104(CNS) Amended by 2010/0137(COD) Amended by 2010/0192(COD) Amended by 2011/0051(COD) Amended by 2011/0138(COD) Amended by 2012/0309(COD) Amended by 2013/0415(COD) Amended by 2016/0075(COD) Amended by 2016/0125(COD) Amended by 2016/0142(COD) See also 2016/2986(RSP) Repealed by 2018/0066(COD) Amended by 2018/0390(COD)
procedure/instrument/1
Repealing Regulation (EC) No 574/1999 1997/0922(CNS) Amended by 2001/0231(CNS) Amended by 2002/0280(CNS) Amended by 2004/0141(CNS) Amended by 2006/0022(CNS) Amended by 2009/0104(CNS) Amended by 2010/0137(COD) Amended by 2010/0192(COD) Amended by 2011/0051(COD) Amended by 2011/0138(COD) Amended by 2012/0309(COD) Amended by 2013/0415(COD) Amended by 2016/0075(COD) Amended by 2016/0125(COD) Amended by 2016/0139(COD) Amended by 2016/0141(COD) Amended by 2016/0142(COD) See also 2016/2986(RSP) Repealed by 2018/0066(COD) Amended by 2018/0390(COD)
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner date: 2000-04-11T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2000-04-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner date: 2000-03-16T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2000-03-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/3
date
2000-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/3
date
2000-06-21T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/4
date
2000-07-05T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/4
date
2000-07-05T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-56&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0056_EN.html
docs/9
date
2001-03-01T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament after reconsultation
body
EP
docs/9
date
2001-03-01T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament after reconsultation
body
EP
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0568/COM_COM(2006)0568_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0568/COM_COM(2006)0568_EN.pdf
docs/12/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0560/COM_COM(2009)0560_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0560/COM_COM(2009)0560_EN.pdf
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2000-179&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2000-0179_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2000-303
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2000-0303_EN.html
events/11/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-56&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0056_EN.html
events/12/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2001-109
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2001-0109_EN.html
docs/3/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2001:121:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:121:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/4/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:121:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2001:121:TOC
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0568/COM_COM(2006)0568_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0568/COM_COM(2006)0568_EN.pdf
docs/13/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0562/COM_COM(2009)0562_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0562/COM_COM(2009)0562_EN.pdf
docs/14/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0620/COM_COM(2010)0620_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0620/COM_COM(2010)0620_EN.pdf
activities
  • date: 2000-01-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2000&nu_doc=27 title: COM(2000)0027 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52000PC0027:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2000-03-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2000-04-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2000-03-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2000-04-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2000-03-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2000-179&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A5-0179/2000 date: 2000-06-21T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2000-07-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20000703&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2000-07-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2000-303 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0303/2000 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2000-09-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2000&nu_doc=577 title: COM(2000)0577 type: Modified legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52000PC0577:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice type: Modified legislative proposal published
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2288 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2288*&MEET_DATE=28/09/2000 type: Debate in Council title: 2288 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 2000-09-28T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2000-11-30T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2314
  • date: 2000-12-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=14191%2F00&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published title: 14191/2000 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published
  • date: 2000-12-11T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Formal reconsultation of Parliament
  • date: 2001-02-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-56&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation title: A5-0056/2001 body: unknown type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
  • date: 2001-02-06T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2000-04-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2000-03-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2001-03-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2001-109 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0109/2001 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2001-03-15T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2337
  • date: 2001-03-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2001-03-15T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2001-03-21T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32001R0539 title: Regulation 2001/539 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2001:081:TOC title: OJ L 081 21.03.2001, p. 0001
commission
  • body: EC dg: Justice and Consumers commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2000-04-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense
committee
AFET
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2000-03-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs and Internal Market
committee
JURI
committees/2
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense
committee
AFET
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
LIBE
date
2000-04-11T00:00:00
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
committees/3
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs and Internal Market
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
LIBE
date
2000-03-16T00:00:00
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2337 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2337*&MEET_DATE=15/03/2001 date: 2001-03-15T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2314 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2314*&MEET_DATE=30/11/2000 date: 2000-11-30T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2288 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2288*&MEET_DATE=28/09/2000 date: 2000-09-28T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2000-01-26T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2000&nu_doc=27 title: EUR-Lex url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2000:177E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 177 27.06.2000, p. 0066 E title: COM(2000)0027 summary: type: Legislative proposal body: EC
  • date: 2000-05-23T00:00:00 docs: title: PE285.924 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2000-06-07T00:00:00 docs: title: PE285.924/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2000-06-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2000-179&language=EN title: A5-0179/2000 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2001:121:TOC title: OJ C 121 24.04.2001, p. 0008 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2000-07-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2000-303 title: T5-0303/2000 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:121:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 121 24.04.2001, p. 0037-0144 summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2000-09-21T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2000&nu_doc=577 title: EUR-Lex url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2000:376E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 376 29.12.2000, p. 0001 E title: COM(2000)0577 summary: type: Modified legislative proposal body: EC
  • date: 2001-01-29T00:00:00 docs: title: PE294.262 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2001-01-29T00:00:00 docs: title: PE294.262/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2001-02-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-56&language=EN title: A5-0056/2001 type: Committee final report tabled for plenary, reconsultation body: EP
  • date: 2001-03-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2001-109 title: T5-0109/2001 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:277:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 277 01.10.2001, p. 0016-0067 summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament after reconsultation body: EP
  • date: 2006-10-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0568/COM_COM(2006)0568_EN.pdf title: COM(2006)0568 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=568 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to present a report from the Commission on cases where visa waiver non-reciprocity is maintained by certain third countries. CONTENT: Council Regulation 539/2001/EC of 15 March 2001 is at the heart of the common EU visa policy, listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of the Member States (Annex I to the Regulation, the “negative list”) and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Annex II to the Regulation, the “positive list”). It was substantially modified by Regulation 851/2005/EC of 2 June 2005, which introduced a new reciprocity mechanism ( CNS/2004/0141 ). The aim of the new mechanism is to establish through appropriate measures reciprocity towards third countries still requiring a visa from citizens of certain Member States for stays of less than 90 days while the Community does not apply such visa requirements towards the citizens of those third countries. Regulation 851/2005/EC allows the visa requirement to be introduced provisionally vis-à-vis the countries concerned. In addition, a joint declaration made by the Council and the Commission when Regulation 851/2005/EC was adopted refers to the possibility of taking other provisional measures, particularly in the political, economic and commercial fields. Pursuant to Regulation 851/2005/EC and in the light of notifications by Member States of cases of non-reciprocity, the Commission on 10 January 2006 presented a report to the Council on visa waiver reciprocity with certain third countries (COM(2006)3). This report described the Commission’s approaches towards the countries on the positive list that continued to require a visa from Member State nationals and listed the results obtained. In view of the progress achieved, the Commission concluded that there was no need at that stage to include with the report a proposal for temporary restoration of the visa requirement or for measures such as those contained in the Council and Commission joint declaration. However, for the purposes of the second report, the Commission stated that it would monitor whether the solutions announced by certain third countries had been put into practice and whether further dialogue with others had opened up the prospect of reciprocal visa-free travel. In its conclusions of 21 February 2006, the Council endorsed the Commission’s analysis and urged it to strengthen its efforts with the United States, Canada and Australia and to monitor progress with the other third countries concerned. With particular regard to Australia, Canada and the United States, the Commission organised a technical meeting on 23 March 2006 with representatives of the Member States concerned in order to assess the state of the dialogue between them and the three third countries in question and the results of the dialogue. That meeting took place in advance of the high-level contacts scheduled between the Commission and the authorities of the three countries over the following weeks. Full reciprocity is now in place in Uruguay and Costa Rica. Steps are still being taken by Brazil and Malaysia with a view to achieving reciprocity. In Paraguay, Singapore and Brunei, the solution of the non-reciprocity problem has been announced but is yet to be put into practice. Main conclusions : the Commission considers that the dialogue with third countries under the new reciprocity mechanism has already proven effective. The steady and significant fall in the number of “non-reciprocity situations” (cases where a third country maintains a visa requirement for nationals of a Member State) is a remarkable success in the Commission's opinion. However, progress remains stalled with one third country (United States) while the situation is evolving with regard to Australia, Canada and Brunei. The future developments with these countries will determine the reflection on the appropriate approach that would allow for further and concrete progress towards the realisation of reciprocity. In view of the importance of achieving full reciprocity, the Commission hereby announces its intention to report to the European Parliament and Council again by not later than 31.03.2007 and to make, where appropriate, concrete proposals if the non-reciprocity situations persist, although formally, under Article 1(5) of the EC Regulation, it is not obliged to present such a report until 30.06.2008. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2008-07-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0486/COM_COM(2008)0486_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0486 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=486 title: EUR-Lex summary: Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of the Member States (Annex I to the Regulation, the “negative list”) and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Annex II to the Regulation, the “positive list”), as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005, is the basic instrument of common visa policy, providing also a reciprocity mechanism for cases where a third country on the positive list maintains or introduces a visa obligation for the citizens of one or more Member States. In its third report in 2007 (refer to the follow-up document of the procedure file CNS/2004/0141 ), the Commission concluded that dialogue with third countries under the new reciprocity mechanism has proven effective. Full reciprocity was achieved with New Zealand and Mexico. Significant progress was achieved in dialogue with Australia. Furthermore, a comprehensive visa waiver agreement should soon be negotiated with Brazil. However, with regard to Canada and the United States of America (USA) it was concluded that little progress had been made. If this continued to be the case, appropriate retaliatory measures could be considered. This fourth report takes stock of the approaches made by the Commission since September 2007 vis-à-vis third countries on the positive list which continue to require visas from nationals of one or more Member States. The Commission considers that since the last report of 13 September 2007 the dialogue with third countries under the new reciprocity mechanism has once again proven effective. Further full visa reciprocity has been achieved with three third countries (Israel, Malaysia and Paraguay). Furthermore, the Commission has achieved significant progress in the dialogue with Canada, for which only Bulgaria and Romania remain under the visa obligation. In the dialogue with Australia the Commission has achieved access for all Member States to the "autogrant facility" and equal treatment for the nationals of all Member States from October 2008. Nevertheless, the implementation of the Australian eVisitors system will be monitored carefully. The negotiations for a short-stay visa waiver agreement between the European Community and Brazil have started, in order to achieve full visa reciprocity with Brazil. No progress has been achieved with Japan, Panama, Singapore and the USA. On Singapore, the Commission regrets that a three month visa free stay for the citizens of the EU has not been granted, while Singaporean citizens enjoy a "three months within six months" visa-free stay in the EU. Furthermore the Commission observes that there is no indication that the visa waiver for the EU citizens will reach the level of the three countries enjoying a preferential treatment. (Australia, South Korea and the United States of America enjoy a preferential 90 day stay in Singapore. The Commission suggests that retaliatory measures should be introduced if within a reasonable time no full reciprocity has been achieved. Regarding the USA , despite all efforts of the Commission and individual Member States and the promises by the USA to bring additional EU Member States in the VWP this year, no tangible progress has been made . The visa requirement is maintained for nationals of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. Therefore, the Commission will propose retaliatory measures e.g. temporary restoration of the visa requirement for U.S. nationals holding diplomatic and service/official passports – as from 1 January 2009 if no progress has been achieved. With regard to the U.S. ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization), the Commission will prepare a preliminary assessment on whether the travel authorization under the ESTA is tantamount to a visa requirement or not. It will publish a final assessment once the Final Rule is published in the Federal Register i.e. 60 days before its entry into force. In view of the importance of achieving full reciprocity, the Commission hereby announces its intention to report to the European Parliament and Council again by not later than 30 June 2009, although formally, under Article 1(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005, it is not obliged to present such a report until 30 June 2010. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2009-10-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0560/COM_COM(2009)0560_EN.pdf title: COM(2009)0560 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2009&nu_doc=560 title: EUR-Lex summary: Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001, listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of the Member States (Annex 1 to the Regulation, the "negative list") and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Annex II to the Regulation, the "positive list"), as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005, is the basic instrument of our common visa policy, providing a reciprocity mechanism for cases where a third country on the positive list maintains or introduces a visa requirement for the citizens of one or more Member States. The previous reports provided a description of the reciprocity mechanism and the state of play of non-reciprocity during the respective periods covered. The notifications by Member States in the framework of the new reciprocity mechanism showed that by June 2005 13 third countries were notified with 75 cases in total. Following their accession to the European Union on 1 January 2007, Bulgaria and Romania notified seven third countries with which a situation of non-reciprocity was in place. The 4 th visa reciprocity report of July 2008 showed that a situation of non-reciprocity still existed with eight third countries from the positive list. The report was presented to the JHA Council on 24 July 2008 and was well received by Member States. Member States were generally optimistic in achieving full visa reciprocity. The present 5 th reciprocity report takes stock of the efforts made by the Commission since July 2008. As detailed below, full visa reciprocity has been achieved with three additional third countries while five third countries on the positive list continue to require visas from nationals of one or more Member States. Conclusions : the Commission considers that since the last report of 23 July 2008, the new visa reciprocity mechanism has once more proved to be effective. Out of the eight third countries on the positive list which required visas from citizens of one or more Member States at the time of the previous report, only five third countries now continue to do so. Full visa reciprocity has been achieved with Japan , Panama and Singapore . Furthermore, significant progress has been achieved with Australia and the U.S. Regarding Australia, the introduction of the eVisitors system has brought about equal treatment of the citizens of all Member States and Schengen associated countries. The Commission will be in a position to determine whether full visa reciprocity has been achieved only once the assessment of the eVisitors system has been completed. As regards the U.S , seven additional Member States have joined the VWP. Nevertheless, the situation is still far from satisfactory and the Commission will pursue discussions with the U.S. in order to secure early inclusion of the remaining five Member States in the VWP. With regard to the U.S. ESTA, the Commission deplores the passage of legislation introducing a fee for the use of the ESTA for the benefit of the U.S. travel and tourism industry . This tax on foreigners would be a retrograde and counter-productive step and could lead to the determination that the ESTA is tantamount to the Schengen visa application process with very serious potential consequences for U.S. travellers to Europe. With regard to Brunei Darussalam , the Commission will closely follow the internal discussions in Brunei Darussalam and continue consultations with Brunei Darussalam authorities in order to achieve a 90 day visa waiver for all Member States. Regarding Brazil , the Commission welcomes the agreement reached on the draft text of the short-stay visa waiver agreement for holders of ordinary passports and expects to achieve an agreement soon on the short-stay visa waiver agreement for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports. The Commission hopes that Brazil will be able to ratify both agreements through their internal procedures as soon as possible. Regarding Canada , the Commission will continue to pursue discussions with Canada in order to achieve progress towards the lifting of the visa requirements for Bulgaria and Romania. In accordance with Article 1(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005, the Commission will again report to the Council and the European Parliament no later than 30 June 2010 . type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2009-10-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0562/COM_COM(2009)0562_EN.pdf title: COM(2009)0562 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2009&nu_doc=562 title: EUR-Lex summary: The Commission presents a special report to the Council on the re-introduction of the visa requirement by Canada for citizens of the Czech Republic. On 14 July 2009, in accordance with Article 1(4)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005, the Czech Republic has notified the Commission and the Council that as of 14 July 2009 Canada unilaterally applies the visa regime to nationals of the Czech Republic . This notification has been published in the Official Journal on 6 August 2009, which means that in accordance with Article 1(4)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005, the Commission shall report to the Council within 90 days from this date of publication; therefore, by 6 November 2009. This report takes stock of the steps taken by the Commission following this notification. The reimposition of the visa requirement of 14 July 2009 : Canada had lifted the visa requirement for nationals of the Czech Republic on 31 October 2007. On 13 July 2009, the Canadian authorities informed the Czech authorities through several channels, including a formal Diplomatic Note, that the visa requirement would be reintroduced for Czech nationals as from the next day. On the same day Canada also introduced the visa requirement for Mexican nationals. Also in this case, the main reason was the large number of refugee claims from Mexico, making it the number one source country for refugee claims in Canada. The rising numbers of Czech refugee claimants – most of them are of Roma origin – in Canada has been discussed repeatedly at meetings between Canadian and Czech authorities since the lifting of the visa requirement on 1 November 2007, and in particular in the run-up to the reintroduction of the visa requirement on 14 July 2009. Steps taken after the reimposition of the visa requirement : on 20 July 2009, the Czech Republic notified the Commission and the Council that, in accordance with Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001, the Czech Republic has imposed the visa requirement for holders of Canadian diplomatic and service passports as from 16 July 2009 . Following the reintroduction of the visa requirement, the Commission consulted both the Czech and Canadian authorities regularly on the issue. Furthermore, the Commission accompanied a Czech delegation for consultations with Canadian authorities in Ottawa on 10 September 2009. In addition, the issue was discussed at the EU-Canada Ministerial Troika in Ottawa on 1 October 2009. Assessement : this is the first time that a third country has re-imposed a visa requirement for citizens of a Member State. The Commission considers that this highly regrettable situation should be brought to an end as soon as possible. Canada is aware that the European Union's common visa policy is based on the principle of reciprocity. It is particularly unsatisfactory that Czech citizens are not able to obtain visas at the Canadian embassy in Prague. The Commission acknowledges that Canada provides several visa process facilitations to Czech citizens in the Czech Republic but calls upon Canada to return to the previous situation regarding the visa issuance process for Czech citizens by reinstating visa issuing facilities in the Czech Republic. The Commission welcomes the willingness of all sides to engage in a dialogue and encourages Canada and the Czech Republic to continue their consultations in the framework of a Canada-Czech Republic Experts Working Group to address all issues in relation to the re-imposition of the visa requirement; e.g. for Canada to clarify its asylum system and the immigration violations by Czech travellers, and for the Czech Republic to clarify the implementation of its programmes and policies regarding minorities and in particular Roma communities. The Commission calls upon Canada to set out clearly a path of measures it intends to take to lift the visa requirement for Czech citizens in the near future. The Commission notes that the Czech Republic has decided to require visas for holders of Canadian diplomatic and service passports. Unless the measures mentioned in the previous paragraphs are established, in a satisfactory manner, by the end of 2009 the Commission will recommend imposing or re-imposing a visa requirement for certain categories of Canadian citizens (holders of diplomatic and service passports). Conclusions : although Canada provides several visa process facilitations to Czech citizens in the Czech Republic, pending restoration of visa-free travel for Czech citizens the Commission calls upon Canada to return to the previous state regarding the visa issuance process for Czech citizens by reinstating visa issuing facilities in the Czech Republic. The Commission encourages Canada and the Czech Republic to continue their consultations in the framework of a Canada-Czech Republic Experts Working Group to address all issues in relation to the re-imposition of the visa requirement, and reiterates its readiness to facilitate and participate in those discussions. The Commission calls upon Canada to set out clearly the measures it intends to take to lift the visa requirement for Czech citizens in the near future. Furthermore the Commission will recommend imposing or re-imposing a visa requirement for certain categories of Canadian citizens, unless Canada takes positive steps towards facilitating formalities for Czech citizens wishing to visit Canada and setting out a path towards the restoration of visa-free travel for them. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2010-11-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0620/COM_COM(2010)0620_EN.pdf title: COM(2010)0620 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2010&nu_doc=620 title: EUR-Lex summary: Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001, listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of the Member States (Annex 1 to the Regulation, the "negative list") and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Annex II to the Regulation, the "positive list"), is the basic instrument of our common visa policy, providing a reciprocity mechanism for cases where a third country on the positive list maintains or introduces a visa requirement for the citizens of one or more Member States. The first four reports showed gradual progress achieved in solving non-reciprocity issues. The fifth visa reciprocity report of 19 October 2009 showed that only five third countries on the positive list still continued to require visas from citizens of one or more Member States. On the same date, the Commission adopted an ad-hoc report on the re-imposition of the visa requirement by Canada for Czech citizens. For the first time a third country on the positive list had re-imposed a visa requirement for citizens of a Member State since the introduction of the new visa reciprocity mechanism in 2005. The Commission concluded that unless Canada were to take positive steps towards facilitating formalities for Czech citizens wishing to visit Canada and setting out a path of measures towards the restoration of visa-free travel for them by the end of 2009, the Commission would recommend imposing or re-imposing a visa requirement for certain categories of Canadian citizens. The present sixth visa reciprocity report takes stock of the results of the efforts made since 19 October 2009. Main conclusions : the implementation of the new visa reciprocity mechanism established in 2005 through Council Regulation (EC) No 851/2005 can be considered as satisfactory. Australia and Japan now provide equal treatment of citizens of all Member States but final determination of full visa reciprocity awaits respectively further assessment of the eVisitor system and the permanent visa waiver for Romania. With Brazil the European Union will sign very soon two visa waiver agreements – one on ordinary passport holders, the other on holders of diplomatic, service or official passports – which will ensure visa reciprocity. The Commission will endeavour an early ratification of these agreements by the European Union and monitor ratification by the Brazilian side. Only a very limited number of "non reciprocity" cases subsist, two of which have specific characteristics: Brunei-Darussalam grants all EU citizens a visa waiver, but it is valid only for 30 days, renewable twice for 30 days; the Commission will continue efforts to establish full reciprocity although the current situation does not lead to problems for EU citizens; Canada has re-introduced the visa requirement for Czech citizens, in 2010 Canada has adopted a reform of its asylum system and agreed to review the visa regime with the Czech Republic before the new Canadian asylum legislation is implemented in the end of 2011. The Czech Republic is fully cooperating with Canada on agreed path of measures supporting this process. The steps indicated by Canada with a goal to review the visa regime with the Czech Republic will be closely monitored by the Commission, in particular, the prompt and appropriate follow-up by Canada of its data-gathering mission to the Czech Republic expected to take place before the end of 2010. In case of a positive assessment the Commission expects Canada to lift visa obligation for Czech citizens. When addressing the other remaining cases of non-reciprocity, i.e. as regards the U.S . (visa requirement for Bulgaria, Cyprus, Romania and Poland) and Canada (visa requirement for Bulgaria and Romania), the EU is confronted with the limits of its reciprocity mechanism as set out in the current acquis . In these cases indeed Member States are considered by third countries not to meet objective criteria for visa waiver set out unilaterally by these third countries in their domestic legislation (e.g. not issuing biometric passports, not meeting thresholds set for visa refusal and/or overstay rates). The Commission will continue to raise these issues at all relevant occasions and in all appropriate fora with the third countries concerned. At the same time, the Commission invites the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States to reflect on how to further address these cases of non-reciprocity. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2017-12-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2017/0813/COM_COM(2017)0813_EN.pdf title: COM(2017)0813 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2017&nu_doc=0813 title: EUR-Lex summary: This Commission communication addresses the state of play and possible ways forward as regards the situation of non-reciprocity with certain third countries in the area of visa policy and assessment of the effectiveness of the reciprocity mechanism provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001. Background : the reciprocity mechanism established by Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 as amended by Regulation (EU) No 1289/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, aims to ensure that EU citizens are subject to the same conditions when travelling to a third country as nationals of that third country are when travelling to the EU. The reciprocity mechanism sets out a procedure starting with a situation of non-reciprocity with precise timeframes and actions to be taken with a view to ending a situation of non-reciprocity. In a communication presented in April 2016, the Commission indicated that the vast majority of notified non-reciprocity cases involving eight third countries had been resolved. However, the communication recalled that, if the third country concerned had not lifted the visa requirement by 12 April 2016 under the reciprocity mechanism, the Commission was required to adopt a delegated act suspending for 12 months the visa exemption for nationals of that third country. The European Parliament’s resolution of 2 March 2017 on the Commission's visa reciprocity obligations invited the Commission to adopt a delegated act temporarily suspending the exemption from the visa requirement for nationals of third countries which have not lifted the visa requirement for citizens of certain Member States – within a period of 24 months from the date of publication of the notifications in this regard. In its follow-up communication of May 2017, the Commission defined its position following the European Parliament resolution. It considered that, in view of the progress made during the previous 12 months and of the work in progress, the adoption of a delegated act temporarily suspending the exemption from the visa requirement for nationals of Canada and the United States would have been counterproductive at that moment. At the same time, the Commission committed to continue working closely with both the European Parliament and the Council, with Canada, the United States as well as with the Member States concerned to accelerate progress towards full visa reciprocity, and to report on the developments by the end of December 2017. This Communication takes stock of progress achieved in this area since May 2017 in discussions with Canada and the United States , and reports that full visa reciprocity with Canada has now been achieved. Recent developments and way ahead : the Commission welcomes that, in line with its earlier commitment, on 1 December 2017, Canada lifted the visa requirement for all Bulgarian and Romanian citizens . Full visa reciprocity has thus been achieved with Canada. The Commission will continue to urge the United States to further cooperate, in the spirit of the Joint Statement adopted in June 2017, with the five Member States concerned and the Commission to accelerate progress towards full visa reciprocity. This should lead to intensified and concrete action on all sides. The Joint Statement confirmed commitments, such as preserving and expanding visa-free travel between the EU and the United States and stepping up efforts to improve cooperation with a view to assist Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Poland and Romania in advancing more rapidly towards the fulfilment of the requirements for the Visa Waiver Program. The Commission also continues to consider that the adoption of a delegated act temporarily suspending the visa waiver for U.S. citizens would be counterproductive at this moment and would not serve to achieve the objective of visa-free travel for all EU citizens to the United States. Assessment on effectiveness of the reciprocity mechanism : the Commission recognises the progress achieved since the adoption of the revised mechanism . Although this progress cannot solely be attributed to the mechanism, it does establish an instrument that allows for collective and coordinated EU action in non-reciprocity cases, and it is considered to have proven to be a useful tool towards some third countries. Despite some procedural shortcomings, the mechanism has helped resolve the vast majority of cases of non-reciprocity over the past two and a half years. At this point in time, the Commission is not considering to bring forward a legislative proposal for the revision of the mechanism . The Commission remains committed to working closely with the European Parliament and the Council on the way forward. It will report on the further developments to the European Parliament and the Council at the latest by autumn 2018. type: Legislative proposal
events
  • date: 2000-01-26T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2000&nu_doc=27 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2000)0027 summary:
  • date: 2000-03-29T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2000-06-21T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 2000-06-21T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2000-179&language=EN title: A5-0179/2000
  • date: 2000-07-03T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20000703&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2000-07-05T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2000-303 title: T5-0303/2000 summary:
  • date: 2000-09-21T00:00:00 type: Modified legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2000&nu_doc=577 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2000)0577 summary:
  • date: 2000-09-28T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2288*&MEET_DATE=28/09/2000 title: 2288 summary:
  • date: 2000-12-04T00:00:00 type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published body: EC docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=14191%2F00&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 14191/2000 summary:
  • date: 2000-12-11T00:00:00 type: Formal reconsultation of Parliament body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2001-02-06T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 2001-02-06T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-56&language=EN title: A5-0056/2001
  • date: 2001-03-01T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2001-109 title: T5-0109/2001 summary:
  • date: 2001-03-15T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2001-03-15T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2001-03-21T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: title: Regulation 2001/539 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32001R0539 title: OJ L 081 21.03.2001, p. 0001 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2001:081:TOC
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
LIBE/5/12618;LIBE/5/14141
New
  • LIBE/5/12618
  • LIBE/5/14141
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32001R0539
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32001R0539
procedure/instrument
Old
Regulation
New
  • Regulation
  • Repealing Regulation (EC) No 574/1999 1997/0922(CNS) Amended by 2001/0231(CNS) Amended by 2002/0280(CNS) Amended by 2004/0141(CNS) Amended by 2006/0022(CNS) Amended by 2009/0104(CNS) Amended by 2010/0137(COD) Amended by 2010/0192(COD) Amended by 2011/0051(COD) Amended by 2011/0138(COD) Amended by 2012/0309(COD) Amended by 2013/0415(COD) Amended by 2016/0075(COD) Amended by 2016/0125(COD) Amended by 2016/0139(COD) Amended by 2016/0141(COD) Amended by 2016/0142(COD) See also 2016/2986(RSP) Repealed by 2018/0066(COD) Amended by 2018/0390(COD)
procedure/subject
Old
  • 7.10.04 External borders crossing and controls, visas
New
7.10.04
External borders crossing and controls, visas
procedure/summary
  • Amended by
  • Amended by
  • Amended by
  • Amended by
  • Amended by
  • Amended by
  • Amended by
  • Amended by
  • Amended by
  • Amended by
  • Amended by
  • Repealing Regulation (EC) No 574/1999
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
procedure/summary/11
Repealed by
activities
  • date: 2000-01-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2000&nu_doc=27 celexid: CELEX:52000PC0027:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2000)0027 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice
  • date: 2000-03-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2000-04-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2000-03-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2000-04-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2000-03-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2000-179&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A5-0179/2000 date: 2000-06-21T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2000-07-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20000703&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2000-07-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2000-303 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0303/2000 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2000-09-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2000&nu_doc=577 celexid: CELEX:52000PC0577:EN type: Modified legislative proposal published title: COM(2000)0577 type: Modified legislative proposal published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2288 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2288*&MEET_DATE=28/09/2000 type: Debate in Council title: 2288 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 2000-09-28T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2000-11-30T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2314
  • date: 2000-12-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=14191%2F00&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published title: 14191/2000 type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice
  • date: 2000-12-11T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Formal reconsultation of Parliament
  • date: 2001-02-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-56&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation title: A5-0056/2001 body: unknown type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
  • date: 2001-02-06T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2000-04-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2000-03-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2001-03-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2001-109 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0109/2001 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2001-03-15T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2337
  • date: 2001-03-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2001-03-15T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2001-03-21T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32001R0539 title: Regulation 2001/539 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2001:081:TOC title: OJ L 081 21.03.2001, p. 0001
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2000-04-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2000-03-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
links
European Commission
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
LIBE/5/12618;LIBE/5/14141
reference
2000/0030(CNS)
instrument
Regulation
legal_basis
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 062
stage_reached
Procedure completed
summary
subtype
Legislation
title
Third countries whose nationals are subject to or exempt from a visa requirement (Visa Regulation)
type
CNS - Consultation procedure
final
subject
7.10.04 External borders crossing and controls, visas