BETA


2000/0139(COD) Postal services: further opening to competition

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead RETT FERBER Markus (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Former Responsible Committee RETT FERBER Markus (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Former Committee Opinion EMPL DE ROSSA Proinsias (icon: PES PES)
Former Committee Opinion ECON
Former Committee Opinion ITRE SAVARY Gilles (icon: PES PES)
Former Committee Opinion JURI MARINHO Luís (icon: PES PES)
Former Committee Opinion BUDG
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 047-p2, EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 055, EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 095

Events

2008/12/22
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The European Commission adopted its 4 th report on the application of the Postal Directive (Directive 97/67/EC as amended by Directive 2002/39/EC). The report covers the period 2006‑2008 and provides a comprehensive assessment of the overall transposition of the Postal Directive in Member States, including regulatory developments and appropriate information on market developments (in particular on technical, social, employment and quality of service aspects).

A number of decisive developments took place in the short timeframe this Report is covering:

Germany – by far the biggest single (national) postal market in the EU – fully liberalised its postal market on 1 January 2008; an evaluation of the full market opening in the UK, which took place on 1 January 2006, seems now possible; the effects of the reduction of the threshold for the reserved area to 50 grams by 1 January 2006 throughout the EU – which is the last intermediate step before the full market opening – can now be assessed; lastly, the Third Postal Directive (2008/6/EC), adopted in February 2008, sets a deadline for the full market opening by 31 December 2010 for the majority of Member States and by 31 December 2012 for the remaining Member States.

The report’s main observations are as follows:

Market opening : during the reporting period, gradual market opening of the postal sector continued and Germany fully liberalized its postal market. Competition also continued to evolve. However, the development of competition with its benefits for businesses and consumers, although emerging, remains slower than expected. This, on the one hand, is due to the fact that a large part of the postal market is still reserved for the incumbent postal operators. The adoption of the Third Postal Directive must be seen as being the decisive step in this respect as it provides for the abolishment of the last legal monopolies and represents a unique opportunity for the postal sector and for the whole economy. Emerging competition, as already identified in Member States that fully opened their market, leads to higher quality and more customer oriented postal services.

Removing the final barriers : apart from the reserved area, other (legal and strategic) market entry barriers still persist. If the vision of an internal market with sustainable and efficient postal services is to become a reality, these market barriers have to be dealt with efficiently and removed. This is the joint responsibility of the Commission and the Member States as well as all stakeholders. In this context, the Commission recalls that in 2003 it submitted to the Council a proposal removing the VAT postal exemption and providing for taxation of all postal service providers. The Council has however not yet been able to agree on this proposal and it has not been discussed since 2004. The adoption of this proposal is now even more pressing since the Third Postal Directive sets a definitive date for the full liberalisation of the national postal markets.

Definition of the Universal Service Obligation and its future financing could also lead to uncertainties for postal operators, especially if implementing national legislation does not provide a clear legal basis (e.g. in relation to the scope of the Universal Service Obligation). Moreover, authorisation and licensing procedures and related conditions are not always conducive to the development of competition. Lastly, the level of transparency of Universal Service Providers' cost data and accounting is still extremely varied and therefore very inconsistent across Member States.

Role of National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) : it has also been established that National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) play an essential role in realising the goal of accomplishing the Internal Market and in a multi-operator environment. The main challenges ahead for the NRAs will be, among others, to arrange interoperability in a multi-operator market, take action against strategic barriers to entry and ensure that tariffs are more geared to costs. In order to allow NRAs to successfully fulfil their tasks, the expertise and staffing of the NRAs should be increased in most of the Member States.

In conclusion, the Commission considers that the focus of the postal sector in the coming years cannot exclusively lie on the transposition process for the Third Postal Directive. Market monitoring and the critically evaluating of the application of the current Postal Directive are of key importance . Member States, especially their NRAs, have to devote their full attention to an efficient transposition of the Third Postal Directive, while at the same time ensuring efficient regulation under the currently applicable Postal Directive. This phase ahead is – as it concerns the transition from several legal regimes to only one – of crucial importance.

The Commission will actively participate in these processes by providing Member States with the opportunity to establish best regulatory practices and, at the same time, continue with active and transparent market monitoring in order to safeguard the objectives of the EU postal reform.

2008/12/22
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The Community framework for EU postal services is set out in Directive 97/67/EC as amended by Directive 2002/39/EC (hereafter referred as “the Postal Directive”). Article 23 of the Postal Directive requires the Commission to report on the application of the Postal Directive to the European Parliament and Council “every two years”. It also requires that this report should include “appropriate information” on market developments including technical, social, employment and quality of service aspects.

Regular market monitoring and reporting is an important element for the full accomplishment of a postal Internal Market in order to identify any shortcomings and problems in due time and to be able to take appropriate (legal) actions when necessary and implement corrective measures. Market monitoring has also been essential to be able to proceed with the EU Postal Reform in a transparent manner and to establish if it has generated the desired effects and benefits.

The Commission provided its first Application Report in November 2002, a second in March 2005 and a third in October 2006. As in the case of previous Application Reports, this Report provides a comprehensive assessment of the overall transposition of the Postal Directive in Member States , including the application of key elements of the Postal Directive and regulatory developments. The Report describes the main developments since the last Application Report adopted in October 2006 and covers the reporting period 2006‑2008 .

It should also be recalled that in February 2008 the Council and the European Parliament adopted Directive 2008/6/EC further amending the Postal Directive (hereafter referred to as "the Third Postal Directive"). The Third Postal Directive sets a deadline for the full market opening by 31st December 2010 for the majority of Member States and by 31st December 2012 for the remaining Member States. This Directive thus provides the legal basis for the accomplishment of the internal market for postal services.

During the reporting period, gradual market opening of the postal sector continued and Germany fully liberalized its postal market. Competition also continued to evolve. However, the development of competition with its benefits for businesses and consumers, although emerging, remains slower than expected . This, on the one hand, is due to the fact that a large part of the postal market is still reserved for the incumbent postal operators. The adoption of the Third Postal Directive must be seen as being the decisive step in this respect as it provides for the abolishment of the last legal monopolies and represents a unique opportunity for the postal sector and for the whole economy. Emerging competition, as already identified in Member States that fully opened their market, leads to higher quality and more customer oriented postal services.

Apart from the reserved area, other (legal and strategic) market entry barriers still persist . If the vision of an internal market with sustainable and efficient postal services is to become a reality, these market barriers have to be dealt with efficiently and removed. This is the joint responsibility of the Commission and the Member States as well as all stakeholders. It is essential that a system of efficient regulation is put in place in all Member States and that national postal legislation does not provide a burden for the emergence of competition and its positive impact on customers' needs.

In this context, it should be recalled that in 2003 the Commission submitted to the Council a proposal removing the VAT postal exemption and providing for taxation of all postal service providers. The Council has however not yet been able to agree on this proposal and it has not been discussed since 2004. The adoption of this proposal is now even more pressing since the Third Postal Directive sets a definitive date for the full liberalisation of the national postal markets. It might be of interest to add that a referral for a preliminary ruling regarding the scope of the VAT exemption for postal services is currently pending before the ECJ.

It has also been established that National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) play an essential role in realising the goal of accomplishing the Internal Market and in a multi-operator environment. The main challenges ahead for the NRAs will be, among others, to arrange interoperability in a multi-operator market, take action against strategic barriers to entry and ensure that tariffs are more geared to costs. In order to allow NRAs to successfully fulfil their tasks, the expertise and staffing of the NRAs should be increased in most of the Member States.

The focus of the postal sector in the coming years is very clear. It cannot exclusively lie on the transposition process for the Third Postal Directive. Market monitoring and the critically evaluating of the application of the current Postal Directive are of key importance. Member States, especially their NRAs, have to devote their full attention to an efficient transposition of the Third Postal Directive, while at the same time ensuring efficient regulation under the currently applicable Postal Directive. This phase ahead is – as it concerns the transition from several legal regimes to only one – of crucial importance.

On the basis of the commitments by the Community legislator and its obligations, the Commission will actively participate in these processes by providing Member States with the opportunity to establish best regulatory practices and at the same time continue with active and transparent market monitoring in order to safeguard the objectives of the EU postal reform.

2006/10/18
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2006/10/18
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

As is the case with the 2005 Application Report, this Report provides a comprehensive assessment of the overall transposition of the Postal Directive in the Member States. The Report also assesses the application of key elements and trends related to the postal services sector such as: economic, technical, social, employment and quality of services trends. The Report summarises and pulls together the main elements and findings of the Commission Staff Working Paper SEC(2006)1293.

The Report finds that in 2004 EU postal services earned around EUR 90 billion - equivalent to 0.9% of the Community’s GDP. As such it plays a significant role in the EU economy. Postal services are labour intensive and account for a large proportion of the EU’s overall employment. In 2004 postal services employed around 1.71 million people with a further 5 million jobs related to postal activities.

At the same time however, postal services are changing. The sector deals with three key EU economic activities namely communications, advertising and transportation/logistics. The Report warns that sector boundaries are beginning to blur and competition must be taken into account when assessing the future of the postal services sector.

Main conclusions

1) Confirmation of the Postal Directive’s timetable: All the intermediate policy results of the Postal Directive have been achieved to date.

- Firstly, the monopolies have been progressively reduced, either by gradually implementing the market opening enshrined in the Postal Directive, or by opening up important segments (such as direct mail) or by fully opening up the postal market as was the case in the UK, for example.

- Secondly, competition has grown. In the most advanced Member States the market share of incumbents has been reduced to around 90%. Competition has not, however, grown as much as was originally hoped.

- Thirdly, universal service providers have restructured and successfully adapted to regulatory and market developments. This development is underpinned by the positive trend towards overall revenue and profitability.

- Fourthly, the quality of service has improved considerably with consumer satisfaction ratings high.

Developments to date provide no evidence supporting the need for changing the 2009 deadline as set out in the Postal Directive.

2) Main focus: High level of universal service and consumer needs:

- The present Postal Directive is based on the principle of minimum harmonisation. This has allowed the Member States to adapt universal services to the specific need of their own country.

- On the other hand the need to fully assure universal service rights for consumers and small businesses is generally uncontested. Individual consumers (including SMEs) and citizens have the right to enjoy the same quality of service – if not better – following the full opening up of the postal market. Their needs must act as a benchmark. This requires that their rights should be strengthened – such as extending the appeal procedures to all operators.

- Greater attention should be given to enhancing co-operation between the National Regulatory Authorities. Such a move could include, for example, information exchange and benchmarking exercises.

2005/03/23
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

This Report is a follow-up to the first Commission Report on the Application of Postal Directive 97/67 which was submitted at the end of 2002. The Report presents the summary of the main conclusions drawn from the analysis provided in the Commission Staff Working Paper (SEC(2005) 388) which assesses in details the overall transposition of the Postal Directive in Member States, the application of key elements of the Directive as well as general market trends (including economic, technical, social, employment and quality of services aspects). In addition, it provides an outline of the perspective and recommendations for future policy development.

The Report confirms that, in sum, the reform of the postal sector in the EU is well on track. Though not yet completed, it has already resulted in a number of significant improvements notably as regards quality of services, improved business efficiency, and the separation of regulators from operators. The role of postal services remains vital in delivering the benefits of the Internal Market to citizens, consumers and business.

This reinforces the need to consider how to move towards more effective and better regulation and an Internal Market for postal services in order to ensure better services for all consumers, including commercial customers and end consumers (greater choice, access, innovation, quality, price options.).

The postal market is at a crucial stage in its development. The Report discusses the further steps needed to promote actual competition in the market, while addressing the end-consumer concerns. It also makes a series of recommendations.

Facilitate the conditions for further modernisation: The postal market is evolving quickly. The clear challenge for regulators and operators is to seize the opportunities. Postal organisations are becoming increasingly flexible in the provision of tailored services to clients. Some of the public postal operators have taken advantage of the gradual opening of the market provided by the Directive to reorganise and modernise. Those who did not seize the opportunities of the last few years and commit themselves to reforms are now coming under market pressure to do so. Further regulatory initiatives may be needed to secure the benefits of a postal internal market for all customers.

Respect the timetable set in the Directive: It is essential to maintain (in parallel) the pace of regulatory reform and respect the timetable set in the Directive for accomplishing the Internal Market for postal services. Developments to date provide no evidence supporting the need for a change of the deadlines set out in the Postal Directive.

Monitor carefully regulatory developments: On critical issues, such as market opening, universal service (quality of services, prices, accessibility from the perspective of the various stakeholders categories) the Commission will carefully monitor developments, and where appropriate take the necessary steps to ensure that Member States meet the requirements set out in the Postal Directive.

Intensify cooperation on regulatory issues: In order to tackle the more complex technical issues (such as licensing, access, regulatory accounting, or market data), the Commission intends to assist NRAs by working on bilateral co-operation between the services of the Commission and the NRA, and technical cooperation at the European level within the framework of the Postal Directive Committee.

Promote an in depth debate on the future postal policy: In light of the rapid evolution of the global communication market, and in the view of the 2006 deadline, it is necessary to open as soon as possible the debate on the future of postal policies to a wide audience, including all stakeholders (public and private operators, customers, consumer associations, social partners, NRAs, Ministries, experts, academics, and industry) at national level as well as at EU level.

In addition to analysing the merits of retaining or removing the reserved area, the debate will need to address key issues such as how to best promote the postal sector, how to ensure the financing of the universal service, and what kind of postal universal service is needed in the future. It will also be necessary to assess the situation in the Member States where the reserved services have been removed, including from an end-consumer perspective. With this in mind, the Commission is launching two studies, on the development of competition and the evolution of the regulatory model for European postal services.

2002/07/05
   Final act published in Official Journal
2002/06/10
   CSL - Final act signed
2002/06/10
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2002/05/07
   CSL - Act approved by Council, 2nd reading
2002/05/07
   CSL - Council Meeting
2002/04/29
   EC - Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading
2002/03/13
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 2nd reading
2002/03/13
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
Documents
2002/03/11
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2002/02/21
   EP - Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
Documents
2002/02/21
   EP - Vote in committee, 2nd reading
2002/02/20
   EP - Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
Documents
2001/12/13
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading
2001/12/10
   EC - Commission communication on Council's position
2001/12/06
   CSL - Council position
2001/12/06
   CSL - Council Meeting
2001/12/05
   CSL - Council position published
Documents
2001/10/15
   CSL - Council Meeting
2001/06/27
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2001/06/27
   CSL - Council Meeting
2001/04/04
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2001/04/04
   CSL - Council Meeting
2001/03/21
   EC - Modified legislative proposal
2001/03/20
   EC - Modified legislative proposal published
2000/12/22
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2000/12/22
   CSL - Council Meeting
2000/12/14
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2000/12/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Documents
2000/12/13
   CofR - Committee of the Regions: opinion
2000/12/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2000/11/29
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
2000/11/22
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
2000/11/22
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
2000/11/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Documents
2000/10/03
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2000/10/03
   CSL - Council Meeting
2000/09/13
   EP - SAVARY Gilles (PES) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2000/09/13
   EP - MARINHO Luís (PES) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2000/09/04
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2000/07/11
   EP - FERBER Markus (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in RETT
2000/07/11
   EP - FERBER Markus (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in RETT
2000/07/05
   EP - DE ROSSA Proinsias (PES) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2000/05/30
   EC - Legislative proposal
2000/05/29
   EC - Legislative proposal published

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/1
date
2000-11-22T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/1
date
2000-10-04T00:00:00
docs
title: PE286.604
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/1/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:232:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2001:232:TOC
docs/2
date
2000-11-14T00:00:00
docs
title: PE286.604/AM
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/3
date
2000-12-13T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee of the Regions: opinion
body
CofR
docs/3
date
2000-11-16T00:00:00
docs
title: PE286.133/DEF
committee
ITRE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/3/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2001:144:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:144:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/4
date
2000-11-22T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/5
date
2000-11-23T00:00:00
docs
title: PE286.260/DEF
committee
EMPL
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/7
date
2000-11-29T00:00:00
docs
title: PE294.901/DEF
committee
JURI
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/8
date
2000-12-13T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee of the Regions: opinion
body
CofR
docs/13
date
2006-10-18T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/13
date
2002-01-15T00:00:00
docs
title: PE301.863
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/13/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0595/COM_COM(2006)0595_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0595/COM_COM(2006)0595_EN.pdf
docs/14
date
2002-02-13T00:00:00
docs
title: PE301.863/AM
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/15
date
2008-12-22T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/15/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3076/COM_SEC(2008)3076_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3076/COM_SEC(2008)3076_EN.pdf
docs/20
date
2006-10-18T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/22
date
2008-12-22T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
events/0/date
Old
2000-05-30T00:00:00
New
2000-05-29T00:00:00
events/4/date
Old
2000-11-22T00:00:00
New
2000-11-21T00:00:00
events/8/date
Old
2001-03-21T00:00:00
New
2001-03-20T00:00:00
events/11/date
Old
2001-12-06T00:00:00
New
2001-12-05T00:00:00
events/14/date
Old
2002-02-21T00:00:00
New
2002-02-20T00:00:00
docs/4
date
2000-11-22T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/4
date
2000-11-22T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/6
date
2000-11-29T00:00:00
docs
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1447)(documentyear:2000)(documentlanguage:EN)
New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1447)(documentyear:2000)(documentlanguage:EN)
docs/7
date
2000-11-29T00:00:00
docs
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/8
date
2000-12-13T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee of the Regions: opinion
body
CofR
docs/8
date
2000-12-13T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee of the Regions: opinion
body
CofR
docs/9/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2000-0571_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2000-0571_EN.html
docs/15/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0058_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0058_EN.html
docs/16/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0100_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0100_EN.html
docs/19/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/1293/COM_SEC(2006)1293_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/1293/COM_SEC(2006)1293_EN.pdf
docs/21/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0884/COM_COM(2008)0884_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0884/COM_COM(2008)0884_EN.pdf
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/4
date
2000-11-22T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2000-0361_EN.html title: A5-0361/2000
events/4
date
2000-11-22T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2000-0361_EN.html title: A5-0361/2000
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20001213&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20001213&type=CRE
events/6
date
2000-12-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2000-0571_EN.html title: T5-0571/2000
summary
events/6
date
2000-12-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2000-0571_EN.html title: T5-0571/2000
summary
events/14/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0058_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0058_EN.html
events/15/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20020311&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20020311&type=CRE
events/16/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0100_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0100_EN.html
events/20/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2002:176:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2002:176:TOC
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism
committee
RETT
rapporteur
name: FERBER Markus date: 2000-07-11T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism
committee
RETT
date
2000-07-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FERBER Markus group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism
committee
RETT
rapporteur
name: FERBER Markus date: 2000-07-11T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism
committee
RETT
date
2000-07-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FERBER Markus group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs and Internal Market
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: MARINHO Luís date: 2000-09-13T00:00:00 group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs and Internal Market
committee
JURI
date
2000-09-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARINHO Luís group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: SAVARY Gilles date: 2000-09-13T00:00:00 group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2000-09-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SAVARY Gilles group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/6
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: DE ROSSA Proinsias date: 2000-07-05T00:00:00 group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/6
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2000-07-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DE ROSSA Proinsias group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
docs/4
date
2000-11-22T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/4
date
2000-11-22T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/8/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2001:144:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:144:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/9
date
2000-12-14T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/9
date
2000-12-14T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/15/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-58&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0058_EN.html
docs/16/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-100
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0100_EN.html
docs/19/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/1293/COM_SEC(2006)1293_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/1293/COM_SEC(2006)1293_EN.pdf
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2000-361&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2000-0361_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2000-571
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2000-0571_EN.html
events/14/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-58&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0058_EN.html
events/16/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-100
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0100_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2000-05-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2000&nu_doc=319 title: COM(2000)0319 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52000PC0319:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2000-09-04T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2000-07-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: DE ROSSA Proinsias body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2000-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: SAVARY Gilles body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2000-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market rapporteur: group: PSE name: MARINHO Luís body: EP responsible: True committee: RETT date: 2000-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: FERBER Markus
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2293 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2293*&MEET_DATE=03/10/2000 type: Debate in Council title: 2293 council: Telecommunications date: 2000-10-03T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2000-07-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: DE ROSSA Proinsias body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2000-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: SAVARY Gilles body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2000-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market rapporteur: group: PSE name: MARINHO Luís body: EP responsible: True committee: RETT date: 2000-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: FERBER Markus docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2000-361&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A5-0361/2000 date: 2000-11-22T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2000-12-04T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Telecommunications meeting_id: X013
  • date: 2000-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20001213&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2000-12-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2000-571 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0571/2000 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2325 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2325*&MEET_DATE=22/12/2000 type: Debate in Council title: 2325 council: Telecommunications date: 2000-12-22T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2001-03-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2001&nu_doc=109 title: COM(2001)0109 type: Modified legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52001PC0109:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services type: Modified legislative proposal published
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2340 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2340*&MEET_DATE=04/04/2001 type: Debate in Council title: 2340 council: Telecommunications date: 2001-04-04T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2364 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2364*&MEET_DATE=27/06/2001 type: Debate in Council title: 2364 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2001-06-27T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2001-10-15T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2374
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2395 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=14091%2F01&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Council position published title: 14091/1/2001 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2001-12-06T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2001-12-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: RETT date: 2000-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: FERBER Markus
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: RETT date: 2000-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: FERBER Markus docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-58&language=EN type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading title: A5-0058/2002 date: 2002-02-21T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading
  • date: 2002-03-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20020311&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2002-03-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-100 type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading title: T5-0100/2002 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
  • date: 2002-05-07T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2424
  • date: 2002-06-10T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2002-06-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2002-07-05T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32002L0039 title: Directive 2002/39 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2002:176:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ L 176 05.07.2002, p. 0021
commission
  • body: EC dg: Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism
committee
RETT
date
2000-07-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FERBER Markus group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism
committee
RETT
date
2000-07-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FERBER Markus group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/2
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
EMPL
date
2000-07-05T00:00:00
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
rapporteur
group: PSE name: DE ROSSA Proinsias
committees/3
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ITRE
date
2000-09-13T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy
rapporteur
group: PSE name: SAVARY Gilles
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs and Internal Market
committee
JURI
date
2000-09-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARINHO Luís group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
JURI
date
2000-09-13T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs and Internal Market
rapporteur
group: PSE name: MARINHO Luís
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2000-09-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SAVARY Gilles group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
RETT
date
2000-07-11T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: FERBER Markus
committees/6
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2000-07-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DE ROSSA Proinsias group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2424 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2424*&MEET_DATE=07/05/2002 date: 2002-05-07T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2395 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2395*&MEET_DATE=06/12/2001 date: 2001-12-06T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2374 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2374*&MEET_DATE=15/10/2001 date: 2001-10-15T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2364 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2364*&MEET_DATE=27/06/2001 date: 2001-06-27T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Telecommunications meeting_id: 2340 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2340*&MEET_DATE=04/04/2001 date: 2001-04-04T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Telecommunications meeting_id: 2325 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2325*&MEET_DATE=22/12/2000 date: 2000-12-22T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Telecommunications meeting_id: 2293 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2293*&MEET_DATE=03/10/2000 date: 2000-10-03T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2000-05-30T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2000&nu_doc=319 title: EUR-Lex url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2000:337E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 337 28.11.2000, p. 0220 E title: COM(2000)0319 summary: type: Legislative proposal body: EC
  • date: 2000-10-04T00:00:00 docs: title: PE286.604 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2000-11-14T00:00:00 docs: title: PE286.604/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2000-11-16T00:00:00 docs: title: PE286.133/DEF committee: ITRE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2000-11-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2000-361&language=EN title: A5-0361/2000 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:232:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 232 17.08.2001, p. 0008 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2000-11-23T00:00:00 docs: title: PE286.260/DEF committee: EMPL type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2000-11-29T00:00:00 docs: title: PE294.901/DEF committee: JURI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2000-11-29T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1447)(documentyear:2000)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES1447/2000 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2001:116:TOC title: OJ C 116 20.04.2001, p. 0099 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
  • date: 2000-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0309)(documentyear:2000)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CDR0309/2000 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2001:144:TOC title: OJ C 144 16.05.2001, p. 0020 type: Committee of the Regions: opinion body: CofR
  • date: 2000-12-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2000-571 title: T5-0571/2000 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2001:232:TOC title: OJ C 232 17.08.2001, p. 0202-0287 summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2001-03-21T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2001&nu_doc=109 title: EUR-Lex url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:180E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 180 26.06.2001, p. 0291 E title: COM(2001)0109 summary: type: Modified legislative proposal body: EC
  • date: 2001-12-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=14091%2F01&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 14091/1/2001 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2002:110E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 110 07.05.2002, p. 0037 E summary: type: Council position body: CSL
  • date: 2001-12-10T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2001&nu_doc=1961 title: EUR-Lex title: SEC(2001)1961 summary: type: Commission communication on Council's position body: EC
  • date: 2002-01-15T00:00:00 docs: title: PE301.863 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2002-02-13T00:00:00 docs: title: PE301.863/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2002-02-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-58&language=EN title: A5-0058/2002 type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading body: EP
  • date: 2002-03-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-100 title: T5-0100/2002 title: OJ C 047 27.02.2003, p. 0087-0217 E summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP
  • date: 2002-04-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2002/0217/COM_COM(2002)0217_EN.pdf title: COM(2002)0217 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2002&nu_doc=217 title: EUR-Lex summary: type: Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading body: EC
  • date: 2005-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2005&nu_doc=102 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2005)0102 summary: This Report is a follow-up to the first Commission Report on the Application of Postal Directive 97/67 which was submitted at the end of 2002. The Report presents the summary of the main conclusions drawn from the analysis provided in the Commission Staff Working Paper (SEC(2005) 388) which assesses in details the overall transposition of the Postal Directive in Member States, the application of key elements of the Directive as well as general market trends (including economic, technical, social, employment and quality of services aspects). In addition, it provides an outline of the perspective and recommendations for future policy development. The Report confirms that, in sum, the reform of the postal sector in the EU is well on track. Though not yet completed, it has already resulted in a number of significant improvements notably as regards quality of services, improved business efficiency, and the separation of regulators from operators. The role of postal services remains vital in delivering the benefits of the Internal Market to citizens, consumers and business. This reinforces the need to consider how to move towards more effective and better regulation and an Internal Market for postal services in order to ensure better services for all consumers, including commercial customers and end consumers (greater choice, access, innovation, quality, price options.). The postal market is at a crucial stage in its development. The Report discusses the further steps needed to promote actual competition in the market, while addressing the end-consumer concerns. It also makes a series of recommendations. Facilitate the conditions for further modernisation: The postal market is evolving quickly. The clear challenge for regulators and operators is to seize the opportunities. Postal organisations are becoming increasingly flexible in the provision of tailored services to clients. Some of the public postal operators have taken advantage of the gradual opening of the market provided by the Directive to reorganise and modernise. Those who did not seize the opportunities of the last few years and commit themselves to reforms are now coming under market pressure to do so. Further regulatory initiatives may be needed to secure the benefits of a postal internal market for all customers. Respect the timetable set in the Directive: It is essential to maintain (in parallel) the pace of regulatory reform and respect the timetable set in the Directive for accomplishing the Internal Market for postal services. Developments to date provide no evidence supporting the need for a change of the deadlines set out in the Postal Directive. Monitor carefully regulatory developments: On critical issues, such as market opening, universal service (quality of services, prices, accessibility from the perspective of the various stakeholders categories) the Commission will carefully monitor developments, and where appropriate take the necessary steps to ensure that Member States meet the requirements set out in the Postal Directive. Intensify cooperation on regulatory issues: In order to tackle the more complex technical issues (such as licensing, access, regulatory accounting, or market data), the Commission intends to assist NRAs by working on bilateral co-operation between the services of the Commission and the NRA, and technical cooperation at the European level within the framework of the Postal Directive Committee. Promote an in depth debate on the future postal policy: In light of the rapid evolution of the global communication market, and in the view of the 2006 deadline, it is necessary to open as soon as possible the debate on the future of postal policies to a wide audience, including all stakeholders (public and private operators, customers, consumer associations, social partners, NRAs, Ministries, experts, academics, and industry) at national level as well as at EU level. In addition to analysing the merits of retaining or removing the reserved area, the debate will need to address key issues such as how to best promote the postal sector, how to ensure the financing of the universal service, and what kind of postal universal service is needed in the future. It will also be necessary to assess the situation in the Member States where the reserved services have been removed, including from an end-consumer perspective. With this in mind, the Commission is launching two studies, on the development of competition and the evolution of the regulatory model for European postal services. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2006-10-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/1293/COM_SEC(2006)1293_EN.pdf title: SEC(2006)1293 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=1293 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2006-10-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0595/COM_COM(2006)0595_EN.pdf title: COM(2006)0595 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=595 title: EUR-Lex summary: As is the case with the 2005 Application Report, this Report provides a comprehensive assessment of the overall transposition of the Postal Directive in the Member States. The Report also assesses the application of key elements and trends related to the postal services sector such as: economic, technical, social, employment and quality of services trends. The Report summarises and pulls together the main elements and findings of the Commission Staff Working Paper SEC(2006)1293. The Report finds that in 2004 EU postal services earned around EUR 90 billion - equivalent to 0.9% of the Community’s GDP. As such it plays a significant role in the EU economy. Postal services are labour intensive and account for a large proportion of the EU’s overall employment. In 2004 postal services employed around 1.71 million people with a further 5 million jobs related to postal activities. At the same time however, postal services are changing. The sector deals with three key EU economic activities namely communications, advertising and transportation/logistics. The Report warns that sector boundaries are beginning to blur and competition must be taken into account when assessing the future of the postal services sector. Main conclusions 1) Confirmation of the Postal Directive’s timetable: All the intermediate policy results of the Postal Directive have been achieved to date. - Firstly, the monopolies have been progressively reduced, either by gradually implementing the market opening enshrined in the Postal Directive, or by opening up important segments (such as direct mail) or by fully opening up the postal market as was the case in the UK, for example. - Secondly, competition has grown. In the most advanced Member States the market share of incumbents has been reduced to around 90%. Competition has not, however, grown as much as was originally hoped. - Thirdly, universal service providers have restructured and successfully adapted to regulatory and market developments. This development is underpinned by the positive trend towards overall revenue and profitability. - Fourthly, the quality of service has improved considerably with consumer satisfaction ratings high. Developments to date provide no evidence supporting the need for changing the 2009 deadline as set out in the Postal Directive. 2) Main focus: High level of universal service and consumer needs: - The present Postal Directive is based on the principle of minimum harmonisation. This has allowed the Member States to adapt universal services to the specific need of their own country. - On the other hand the need to fully assure universal service rights for consumers and small businesses is generally uncontested. Individual consumers (including SMEs) and citizens have the right to enjoy the same quality of service – if not better – following the full opening up of the postal market. Their needs must act as a benchmark. This requires that their rights should be strengthened – such as extending the appeal procedures to all operators. - Greater attention should be given to enhancing co-operation between the National Regulatory Authorities. Such a move could include, for example, information exchange and benchmarking exercises. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2008-12-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0884/COM_COM(2008)0884_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0884 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=884 title: EUR-Lex summary: The European Commission adopted its 4 th report on the application of the Postal Directive (Directive 97/67/EC as amended by Directive 2002/39/EC). The report covers the period 2006‑2008 and provides a comprehensive assessment of the overall transposition of the Postal Directive in Member States, including regulatory developments and appropriate information on market developments (in particular on technical, social, employment and quality of service aspects). A number of decisive developments took place in the short timeframe this Report is covering: Germany – by far the biggest single (national) postal market in the EU – fully liberalised its postal market on 1 January 2008; an evaluation of the full market opening in the UK, which took place on 1 January 2006, seems now possible; the effects of the reduction of the threshold for the reserved area to 50 grams by 1 January 2006 throughout the EU – which is the last intermediate step before the full market opening – can now be assessed; lastly, the Third Postal Directive (2008/6/EC), adopted in February 2008, sets a deadline for the full market opening by 31 December 2010 for the majority of Member States and by 31 December 2012 for the remaining Member States. The report’s main observations are as follows: Market opening : during the reporting period, gradual market opening of the postal sector continued and Germany fully liberalized its postal market. Competition also continued to evolve. However, the development of competition with its benefits for businesses and consumers, although emerging, remains slower than expected. This, on the one hand, is due to the fact that a large part of the postal market is still reserved for the incumbent postal operators. The adoption of the Third Postal Directive must be seen as being the decisive step in this respect as it provides for the abolishment of the last legal monopolies and represents a unique opportunity for the postal sector and for the whole economy. Emerging competition, as already identified in Member States that fully opened their market, leads to higher quality and more customer oriented postal services. Removing the final barriers : apart from the reserved area, other (legal and strategic) market entry barriers still persist. If the vision of an internal market with sustainable and efficient postal services is to become a reality, these market barriers have to be dealt with efficiently and removed. This is the joint responsibility of the Commission and the Member States as well as all stakeholders. In this context, the Commission recalls that in 2003 it submitted to the Council a proposal removing the VAT postal exemption and providing for taxation of all postal service providers. The Council has however not yet been able to agree on this proposal and it has not been discussed since 2004. The adoption of this proposal is now even more pressing since the Third Postal Directive sets a definitive date for the full liberalisation of the national postal markets. Definition of the Universal Service Obligation and its future financing could also lead to uncertainties for postal operators, especially if implementing national legislation does not provide a clear legal basis (e.g. in relation to the scope of the Universal Service Obligation). Moreover, authorisation and licensing procedures and related conditions are not always conducive to the development of competition. Lastly, the level of transparency of Universal Service Providers' cost data and accounting is still extremely varied and therefore very inconsistent across Member States. Role of National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) : it has also been established that National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) play an essential role in realising the goal of accomplishing the Internal Market and in a multi-operator environment. The main challenges ahead for the NRAs will be, among others, to arrange interoperability in a multi-operator market, take action against strategic barriers to entry and ensure that tariffs are more geared to costs. In order to allow NRAs to successfully fulfil their tasks, the expertise and staffing of the NRAs should be increased in most of the Member States. In conclusion, the Commission considers that the focus of the postal sector in the coming years cannot exclusively lie on the transposition process for the Third Postal Directive. Market monitoring and the critically evaluating of the application of the current Postal Directive are of key importance . Member States, especially their NRAs, have to devote their full attention to an efficient transposition of the Third Postal Directive, while at the same time ensuring efficient regulation under the currently applicable Postal Directive. This phase ahead is – as it concerns the transition from several legal regimes to only one – of crucial importance. The Commission will actively participate in these processes by providing Member States with the opportunity to establish best regulatory practices and, at the same time, continue with active and transparent market monitoring in order to safeguard the objectives of the EU postal reform. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2008-12-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3076/COM_SEC(2008)3076_EN.pdf title: SEC(2008)3076 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=3076 title: EUR-Lex summary: The Community framework for EU postal services is set out in Directive 97/67/EC as amended by Directive 2002/39/EC (hereafter referred as “the Postal Directive”). Article 23 of the Postal Directive requires the Commission to report on the application of the Postal Directive to the European Parliament and Council “every two years”. It also requires that this report should include “appropriate information” on market developments including technical, social, employment and quality of service aspects. Regular market monitoring and reporting is an important element for the full accomplishment of a postal Internal Market in order to identify any shortcomings and problems in due time and to be able to take appropriate (legal) actions when necessary and implement corrective measures. Market monitoring has also been essential to be able to proceed with the EU Postal Reform in a transparent manner and to establish if it has generated the desired effects and benefits. The Commission provided its first Application Report in November 2002, a second in March 2005 and a third in October 2006. As in the case of previous Application Reports, this Report provides a comprehensive assessment of the overall transposition of the Postal Directive in Member States , including the application of key elements of the Postal Directive and regulatory developments. The Report describes the main developments since the last Application Report adopted in October 2006 and covers the reporting period 2006‑2008 . It should also be recalled that in February 2008 the Council and the European Parliament adopted Directive 2008/6/EC further amending the Postal Directive (hereafter referred to as "the Third Postal Directive"). The Third Postal Directive sets a deadline for the full market opening by 31st December 2010 for the majority of Member States and by 31st December 2012 for the remaining Member States. This Directive thus provides the legal basis for the accomplishment of the internal market for postal services. During the reporting period, gradual market opening of the postal sector continued and Germany fully liberalized its postal market. Competition also continued to evolve. However, the development of competition with its benefits for businesses and consumers, although emerging, remains slower than expected . This, on the one hand, is due to the fact that a large part of the postal market is still reserved for the incumbent postal operators. The adoption of the Third Postal Directive must be seen as being the decisive step in this respect as it provides for the abolishment of the last legal monopolies and represents a unique opportunity for the postal sector and for the whole economy. Emerging competition, as already identified in Member States that fully opened their market, leads to higher quality and more customer oriented postal services. Apart from the reserved area, other (legal and strategic) market entry barriers still persist . If the vision of an internal market with sustainable and efficient postal services is to become a reality, these market barriers have to be dealt with efficiently and removed. This is the joint responsibility of the Commission and the Member States as well as all stakeholders. It is essential that a system of efficient regulation is put in place in all Member States and that national postal legislation does not provide a burden for the emergence of competition and its positive impact on customers' needs. In this context, it should be recalled that in 2003 the Commission submitted to the Council a proposal removing the VAT postal exemption and providing for taxation of all postal service providers. The Council has however not yet been able to agree on this proposal and it has not been discussed since 2004. The adoption of this proposal is now even more pressing since the Third Postal Directive sets a definitive date for the full liberalisation of the national postal markets. It might be of interest to add that a referral for a preliminary ruling regarding the scope of the VAT exemption for postal services is currently pending before the ECJ. It has also been established that National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) play an essential role in realising the goal of accomplishing the Internal Market and in a multi-operator environment. The main challenges ahead for the NRAs will be, among others, to arrange interoperability in a multi-operator market, take action against strategic barriers to entry and ensure that tariffs are more geared to costs. In order to allow NRAs to successfully fulfil their tasks, the expertise and staffing of the NRAs should be increased in most of the Member States. The focus of the postal sector in the coming years is very clear. It cannot exclusively lie on the transposition process for the Third Postal Directive. Market monitoring and the critically evaluating of the application of the current Postal Directive are of key importance. Member States, especially their NRAs, have to devote their full attention to an efficient transposition of the Third Postal Directive, while at the same time ensuring efficient regulation under the currently applicable Postal Directive. This phase ahead is – as it concerns the transition from several legal regimes to only one – of crucial importance. On the basis of the commitments by the Community legislator and its obligations, the Commission will actively participate in these processes by providing Member States with the opportunity to establish best regulatory practices and at the same time continue with active and transparent market monitoring in order to safeguard the objectives of the EU postal reform. type: Follow-up document body: EC
events
  • date: 2000-05-30T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2000&nu_doc=319 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2000)0319 summary:
  • date: 2000-09-04T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2000-10-03T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2293*&MEET_DATE=03/10/2000 title: 2293 summary:
  • date: 2000-11-22T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 2000-11-22T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2000-361&language=EN title: A5-0361/2000
  • date: 2000-12-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20001213&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2000-12-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2000-571 title: T5-0571/2000 summary:
  • date: 2000-12-22T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2325*&MEET_DATE=22/12/2000 title: 2325
  • date: 2001-03-21T00:00:00 type: Modified legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2001&nu_doc=109 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2001)0109 summary:
  • date: 2001-04-04T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2340*&MEET_DATE=04/04/2001 title: 2340
  • date: 2001-06-27T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2364*&MEET_DATE=27/06/2001 title: 2364
  • date: 2001-12-06T00:00:00 type: Council position published body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=14091%2F01&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 14091/1/2001 summary:
  • date: 2001-12-13T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP
  • date: 2002-02-21T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 2002-02-21T00:00:00 type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-58&language=EN title: A5-0058/2002
  • date: 2002-03-11T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20020311&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2002-03-13T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-100 title: T5-0100/2002 summary:
  • date: 2002-05-07T00:00:00 type: Act approved by Council, 2nd reading body: CSL
  • date: 2002-06-10T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL
  • date: 2002-06-10T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2002-07-05T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: title: Directive 2002/39 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32002L0039 title: OJ L 176 05.07.2002, p. 0021 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2002:176:SOM:EN:HTML
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
RETT/5/14238
New
  • RETT/5/14238
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32002L0039
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32002L0039
procedure/instrument
Old
Directive
New
  • Directive
  • Amending Directive 97/67/EC 1995/0221(COD)
procedure/subject
Old
  • 2.40.02 Public services, of general interest, universal service
  • 3.30.09 Postal services
New
2.40.02
Public services, of general interest, universal service
3.30.09
Postal services, parcel delivery services
procedure/summary
  • Amending Directive 97/67/EC
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
activities
  • date: 2000-05-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2000&nu_doc=319 celexid: CELEX:52000PC0319:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2000)0319 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services
  • date: 2000-09-04T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2000-07-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: DE ROSSA Proinsias body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2000-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: SAVARY Gilles body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2000-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market rapporteur: group: PSE name: MARINHO Luís body: EP responsible: True committee: RETT date: 2000-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: FERBER Markus
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2293 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2293*&MEET_DATE=03/10/2000 type: Debate in Council title: 2293 council: Telecommunications date: 2000-10-03T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2000-07-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: DE ROSSA Proinsias body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2000-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: SAVARY Gilles body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2000-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market rapporteur: group: PSE name: MARINHO Luís body: EP responsible: True committee: RETT date: 2000-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: FERBER Markus docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2000-361&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A5-0361/2000 date: 2000-11-22T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2000-12-04T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Telecommunications meeting_id: X013
  • date: 2000-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20001213&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2000-12-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2000-571 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0571/2000 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2325 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2325*&MEET_DATE=22/12/2000 type: Debate in Council title: 2325 council: Telecommunications date: 2000-12-22T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2001-03-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2001&nu_doc=109 celexid: CELEX:52001PC0109:EN type: Modified legislative proposal published title: COM(2001)0109 type: Modified legislative proposal published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2340 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2340*&MEET_DATE=04/04/2001 type: Debate in Council title: 2340 council: Telecommunications date: 2001-04-04T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2364 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2364*&MEET_DATE=27/06/2001 type: Debate in Council title: 2364 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2001-06-27T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2001-10-15T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2374
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2395 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=14091%2F01&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Council position published title: 14091/1/2001 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2001-12-06T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2001-12-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: RETT date: 2000-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: FERBER Markus
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: RETT date: 2000-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: FERBER Markus docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-58&language=EN type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading title: A5-0058/2002 date: 2002-02-21T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading
  • date: 2002-03-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20020311&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2002-03-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-100 type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading title: T5-0100/2002 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
  • date: 2002-05-07T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2424
  • date: 2002-06-10T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2002-06-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2002-07-05T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32002L0039 title: Directive 2002/39 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2002:176:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ L 176 05.07.2002, p. 0021
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2000-07-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: DE ROSSA Proinsias
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2000-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: SAVARY Gilles
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2000-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market rapporteur: group: PSE name: MARINHO Luís
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: RETT date: 2000-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: FERBER Markus
links
European Commission
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
RETT/5/14238
reference
2000/0139(COD)
instrument
Directive
legal_basis
stage_reached
Procedure completed
summary
Amending Directive 97/67/EC
subtype
Legislation
title
Postal services: further opening to competition
type
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
final
subject