BETA


2001/0105(CNS) Protection of the euro against counterfeiting, Pericles programme 2002-2005

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead LIBE SCHMID Gerhard (icon: PES PES)
Committee Opinion BUDG NARANJO ESCOBAR Juan Andrés (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion ECON TORRES MARQUES Helena (icon: PES PES)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 123-p4

Events

2014/09/05
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The Commission presents a report concerning the implementation and the results of the Pericles programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting 2006 -2013.

Implementation of the programme and results : based on the reference amount of EUR 1 million for 2006 and EUR 6.9 million for the period 2007-2013, the annual appropriations authorised under the Pericles programme were EUR 1 million per year with the exception of 2010 (EUR 0.9 million).

The report notes that the implementation of Pericles reflected the high level of interest of Member States on the protection of the euro against counterfeiting. Accordingly, 95.7% of the budget has been committed. In three consecutive years (2009-2010-2011) OLAF had to recommit budget de-committed during the same year in order to meet Member States’ requests.

In the period 2006-2013 Pericles funded 113 projects . Of these projects 72 originated from the competent authorities of Member States, while 41 were initiatives of the Commission/OLAF. Most of the actions implemented during that period were training and dissemination and activities involving staff exchanges.

Target groups :

· participants came from 83 countries . The majority of trainees (51%) were Member States nationals with clear predominance of staff from the euro area. European participants account for 73 % in total, while 16% of trainees were from Latin America (mainly Colombia, Peru and Argentina). While Africa was mainly represented by North African nationalities, the participation of Asian trainees was mainly limited to Chinese;

· with respect to the professional background of participants , members from police forces, represent 64% of the total. The report stresses the differences among the various other categories of participants (36%), including a high participation from Central Banks (11%) and judicial staff (7%).

Pericles actions took place both inside and outside the EU. In specific focus were Latin America (where Colombian and Peruvian organised crime represents a substantial threat for the euro) and neighbouring areas such as the South East of Europe (including Turkey and the Western Balkans), the Mediterranean region and the North East of Europe.

Structural and legislative improvements: Pericles actions have led to:

· a number of structural and legislative improvements in Member States and in third countries. Among others, Colombia, Peru and Argentina made a strong effort to establish structures against counterfeiting similar to the National Central Offices in the European Union;

· assisting the acceding countries and newcomers in their efforts to apply the EU acquis in the specific area of protecting the euro;

· being used by the Commission in the preparation of the proposal for a Directive on the protection of the euro and other currencies against counterfeiting by criminal law.

Lastly, Regulation (EU) No 331/201417 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the “Pericles 2020” programme) was adopted on 11 March 2014. The Commission shall provide annual information on the results of the Programme to the European Parliament and to the Council.

2006/05/23
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

PURPOSE : to present a report on the implementation and results of the Pericles programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting.

CONTENT : Article 13(3)(b) of the Pericles Decision, a detailed report on the implementation and results of the Programme is required to be submitted to the European Parliament and the Council. The present report responds to that requirement.

Overall, since early Summer 2003, the number of counterfeit euro banknotes detected in circulation has stabilised at about 50 000 a month, a level below the pre-euro levels, lower than the US dollar and extremely low compared to the 9 billion genuine euro banknotes in circulation. At the same time, the number of counterfeit euro coins is continuing to increase but also remains low by historical standards. In addition, the police forces have successfully conducted a number of operations to dismantle workshops and seize large numbers of counterfeit banknotes and coins before they enter into circulation.

This overall favourable situation is the result of a long preparation at both legislative and institutional level and demonstrates the high level of cooperation achieved in EU and at international level.

The Pericles programme is playing a significant role in achieving the present results in the protection of the euro and the fight against the crime of counterfeiting, through the exchange of information and the development of cooperation. Training and technical assistance plays an important role in this respect, hence the need to continue the Pericles programme.

As regards the implementation of the programme : based on the reference amount of EUR 4 million for the period 2002-2005 and EUR 1 million for 2006, the annual appropriations authorised under the Pericles programme, were EUR 1.2 million for 2002; EUR 0.9 million for 2003; EUR 0.9 million for 2004; EUR 1 million for 2005 and EUR 1 million for 2006.

The implementation of the Programme made a slow start, mainly due to its adoption in December 2001. Thus, the first project under Pericles was only carried out in October 2002 and the amount committed in 2002 was just under 40% of the initial budget allocation. Subsequently, the programme took off and the budget allocation was committed at high levels in 2003, 2004 and 2005. Based on these statistics/forecasts, the overall level of commitments during the period 2002-2006 will have reached 80% of the initial reference amount.

Value added of the programme : the Pericles programme has been offering substantial value added to the protection of the euro against counterfeiting. This has materialised through a broad range of actions

undertaken, the precise targeting of the actions and the large numbers of participants.

Emphasis was put on the European dimension of the fight against euro counterfeiting and, in addition to the EU Member States, it was possible to target sensitive geographical areas. Finally, the Pericles programme has made a substantial contribution to the further improvement of coordination and cooperation at international, European and Member States level, as well as the creation of more solid structures for the protection of the European currency.

Broad range of Actions : in the course of the first four years of the programme 50 projects were initiated; for 2006 another 14 actions are intended by the Member States and the Commission. Of the total 64 projects, 48 originate from the competent authorities of Member States, while 16 were initiatives of the Commission/OLAF. Most of the actions carried out have been conferences, seminars and workshops, as well as specialised training courses. Staff exchange has, nonetheless, gained ground and has now become a standard feature of Pericles. Following enlargement, this type of activity is likely to develop further, which is also in line with the recommendation of the Pericles evaluator. Only one technical study was implemented under the current Pericles and another two are in the

process of implementation in 2006.

European Dimension : the organisation of Pericles actions covered all the areas relevant to the protection of the euro: law enforcement, judicial, financial and technical and promoted particularly the creation of networks useful for achieving greater efficiency in the fight against the crime of counterfeiting. The European dimension of the protection of the euro is emphasised through the systematic involvement of ECB, Europol and other European and international organisations in Pericles actions.

Geographical Emphasis : the Pericles actions have taken place mostly inside the EU. However, a number of actions have been organised in third or candidate countries, reflecting the specific needs to protect the euro. Awareness-raising actions were a priority for candidate countries before accession. By

identifying areas having a major impact on the production of counterfeit banknotes, South America, in particular Colombia became a major focus for Pericles actions, as were countries neighbouring the EU, including Bulgaria and Romania.

Coordination among European Bodies and within the Commission : Pericles has now practically centralised Community level initiatives carried out by the Commission and Member State with respect to the protection of the euro and has also largely replaced the Commission’s specific ‘Protection of the euro’ budget line. A small number of actions geared to the protection against currency counterfeiting are carried out under other Community programmes, such as TAIEX and Twinning. Such actions are mainly single-country or single-subject actions (i.e. not eligible under Pericles) and are systematically coordinated with Pericles by the competent service in the Commission in coordination with Member States.

Increased cooperation and coordination among Member States : the success of the Pericles programme is demonstrated by the increased effectiveness of the cooperation among law enforcement agents, and more recently, representatives of the judiciary and financial institutions. This is true particularly between Member States but also with respect to acceding, candidate and other neighbouring countries. In addition to its training and technical content, the Pericles programme provides a forum for regular contacts among experts responsible for the protection of the euro but importantly, also enables professionals to develop links which contribute to closer working relationships and improved cooperation overall.

Structural improvements : Pericles actions have led to a number of structural and other improvements in Member States and in third countries. Among others, National Central Offices for the fight against counterfeiting were created in several countries; two Pericles seminars assisted the (then) acceding countries in their efforts to apply the Community acquis in the specific area of protecting the euro; a code of conduct was drawn with respect to press and communication issues; and one of the workshops led to a proposal, by Member States, for a Council Recommendation.

2001/12/21
   Final act published in Official Journal
2001/12/17
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
2001/12/17
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2001/12/17
   CSL - Council Meeting
2001/11/13
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2001/11/13
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Documents
2001/10/16
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2001/10/16
   EP - Vote in committee
2001/10/16
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2001/10/11
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2001/10/10
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2001/10/09
   ECB - Document attached to the procedure
2001/09/28
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2001/09/27
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2001/08/27
   EP - TORRES MARQUES Helena (PES) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2001/07/10
   EP - SCHMID Gerhard (PES) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2001/07/05
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2001/06/26
   EP - NARANJO ESCOBAR Juan Andrés (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2001/05/22
   EC - Legislative proposal published

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0362_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0362_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2001-0583_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2001-0583_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0362_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0362_EN.html
events/4
date
2001-11-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2001-0583_EN.html title: T5-0583/2001
summary
events/4
date
2001-11-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2001-0583_EN.html title: T5-0583/2001
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: SCHMID Gerhard date: 2001-07-10T00:00:00 group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2001-07-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SCHMID Gerhard group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: NARANJO ESCOBAR Juan Andrés date: 2001-06-26T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2001-06-26T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NARANJO ESCOBAR Juan Andrés group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: TORRES MARQUES Helena date: 2001-08-27T00:00:00 group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2001-08-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TORRES MARQUES Helena group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-362&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0362_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2001-583
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2001-0583_EN.html
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0550/COM_COM(2014)0550_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0550/COM_COM(2014)0550_EN.pdf
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-362&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0362_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2001-583
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2001-0583_EN.html
events/7/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2001:339:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2001:339:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2001:293:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:293:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0550/COM_COM(2014)0550_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0550/COM_COM(2014)0550_EN.pdf
activities
  • date: 2001-05-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2001&nu_doc=248 title: COM(2001)0248 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52001PC0248(02):EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/ title: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2001-07-05T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2001-06-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: NARANJO ESCOBAR Juan Andrés body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2001-08-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: TORRES MARQUES Helena body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2001-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: SCHMID Gerhard
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2001-06-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: NARANJO ESCOBAR Juan Andrés body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2001-08-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: TORRES MARQUES Helena body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2001-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: SCHMID Gerhard docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-362&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A5-0362/2001 date: 2001-10-16T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2001-11-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2001-583 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0583/2001 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2001-12-17T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Fisheries meeting_id: 2400
  • date: 2001-12-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2001-12-17T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2001-12-21T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32001D0923 title: Decision 2001/923 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2001:339:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ L 339 21.12.2001, p. 0050
commission
  • body: EC dg: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2001-07-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SCHMID Gerhard group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2001-06-26T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: NARANJO ESCOBAR Juan Andrés
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2001-06-26T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NARANJO ESCOBAR Juan Andrés group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ECON
date
2001-08-27T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
rapporteur
group: PSE name: TORRES MARQUES Helena
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2001-08-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TORRES MARQUES Helena group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
LIBE
date
2001-07-10T00:00:00
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: PSE name: SCHMID Gerhard
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Fisheries meeting_id: 2400 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2400*&MEET_DATE=17/12/2001 date: 2001-12-17T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2001-09-27T00:00:00 docs: title: PE302.277 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2001-09-28T00:00:00 docs: title: PE306.854/DEF committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2001-10-09T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2001:293:TOC title: OJ C 293 19.10.2001, p. 0003 title: BCE(2001)0031 summary: type: Document attached to the procedure body: ECB
  • date: 2001-10-10T00:00:00 docs: title: PE304.736/DEF committee: ECON type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2001-10-11T00:00:00 docs: title: PE302.277/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2001-10-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-362&language=EN title: A5-0362/2001 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2001-11-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2001-583 title: T5-0583/2001 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2002:140E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 140 13.06.2002, p. 0023-0114 E summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-05-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0243/COM_COM(2006)0243_EN.pdf title: COM(2006)0243 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=243 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE : to present a report on the implementation and results of the Pericles programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting. CONTENT : Article 13(3)(b) of the Pericles Decision, a detailed report on the implementation and results of the Programme is required to be submitted to the European Parliament and the Council. The present report responds to that requirement. Overall, since early Summer 2003, the number of counterfeit euro banknotes detected in circulation has stabilised at about 50 000 a month, a level below the pre-euro levels, lower than the US dollar and extremely low compared to the 9 billion genuine euro banknotes in circulation. At the same time, the number of counterfeit euro coins is continuing to increase but also remains low by historical standards. In addition, the police forces have successfully conducted a number of operations to dismantle workshops and seize large numbers of counterfeit banknotes and coins before they enter into circulation. This overall favourable situation is the result of a long preparation at both legislative and institutional level and demonstrates the high level of cooperation achieved in EU and at international level. The Pericles programme is playing a significant role in achieving the present results in the protection of the euro and the fight against the crime of counterfeiting, through the exchange of information and the development of cooperation. Training and technical assistance plays an important role in this respect, hence the need to continue the Pericles programme. As regards the implementation of the programme : based on the reference amount of EUR 4 million for the period 2002-2005 and EUR 1 million for 2006, the annual appropriations authorised under the Pericles programme, were EUR 1.2 million for 2002; EUR 0.9 million for 2003; EUR 0.9 million for 2004; EUR 1 million for 2005 and EUR 1 million for 2006. The implementation of the Programme made a slow start, mainly due to its adoption in December 2001. Thus, the first project under Pericles was only carried out in October 2002 and the amount committed in 2002 was just under 40% of the initial budget allocation. Subsequently, the programme took off and the budget allocation was committed at high levels in 2003, 2004 and 2005. Based on these statistics/forecasts, the overall level of commitments during the period 2002-2006 will have reached 80% of the initial reference amount. Value added of the programme : the Pericles programme has been offering substantial value added to the protection of the euro against counterfeiting. This has materialised through a broad range of actions undertaken, the precise targeting of the actions and the large numbers of participants. Emphasis was put on the European dimension of the fight against euro counterfeiting and, in addition to the EU Member States, it was possible to target sensitive geographical areas. Finally, the Pericles programme has made a substantial contribution to the further improvement of coordination and cooperation at international, European and Member States level, as well as the creation of more solid structures for the protection of the European currency. Broad range of Actions : in the course of the first four years of the programme 50 projects were initiated; for 2006 another 14 actions are intended by the Member States and the Commission. Of the total 64 projects, 48 originate from the competent authorities of Member States, while 16 were initiatives of the Commission/OLAF. Most of the actions carried out have been conferences, seminars and workshops, as well as specialised training courses. Staff exchange has, nonetheless, gained ground and has now become a standard feature of Pericles. Following enlargement, this type of activity is likely to develop further, which is also in line with the recommendation of the Pericles evaluator. Only one technical study was implemented under the current Pericles and another two are in the process of implementation in 2006. European Dimension : the organisation of Pericles actions covered all the areas relevant to the protection of the euro: law enforcement, judicial, financial and technical and promoted particularly the creation of networks useful for achieving greater efficiency in the fight against the crime of counterfeiting. The European dimension of the protection of the euro is emphasised through the systematic involvement of ECB, Europol and other European and international organisations in Pericles actions. Geographical Emphasis : the Pericles actions have taken place mostly inside the EU. However, a number of actions have been organised in third or candidate countries, reflecting the specific needs to protect the euro. Awareness-raising actions were a priority for candidate countries before accession. By identifying areas having a major impact on the production of counterfeit banknotes, South America, in particular Colombia became a major focus for Pericles actions, as were countries neighbouring the EU, including Bulgaria and Romania. Coordination among European Bodies and within the Commission : Pericles has now practically centralised Community level initiatives carried out by the Commission and Member State with respect to the protection of the euro and has also largely replaced the Commission’s specific ‘Protection of the euro’ budget line. A small number of actions geared to the protection against currency counterfeiting are carried out under other Community programmes, such as TAIEX and Twinning. Such actions are mainly single-country or single-subject actions (i.e. not eligible under Pericles) and are systematically coordinated with Pericles by the competent service in the Commission in coordination with Member States. Increased cooperation and coordination among Member States : the success of the Pericles programme is demonstrated by the increased effectiveness of the cooperation among law enforcement agents, and more recently, representatives of the judiciary and financial institutions. This is true particularly between Member States but also with respect to acceding, candidate and other neighbouring countries. In addition to its training and technical content, the Pericles programme provides a forum for regular contacts among experts responsible for the protection of the euro but importantly, also enables professionals to develop links which contribute to closer working relationships and improved cooperation overall. Structural improvements : Pericles actions have led to a number of structural and other improvements in Member States and in third countries. Among others, National Central Offices for the fight against counterfeiting were created in several countries; two Pericles seminars assisted the (then) acceding countries in their efforts to apply the Community acquis in the specific area of protecting the euro; a code of conduct was drawn with respect to press and communication issues; and one of the workshops led to a proposal, by Member States, for a Council Recommendation. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2014-09-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2014/0550/COM_COM(2014)0550_EN.pdf title: COM(2014)0550 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0550 title: EUR-Lex summary: The Commission presents a report concerning the implementation and the results of the Pericles programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting 2006 -2013. Implementation of the programme and results : based on the reference amount of EUR 1 million for 2006 and EUR 6.9 million for the period 2007-2013, the annual appropriations authorised under the Pericles programme were EUR 1 million per year with the exception of 2010 (EUR 0.9 million). The report notes that the implementation of Pericles reflected the high level of interest of Member States on the protection of the euro against counterfeiting. Accordingly, 95.7% of the budget has been committed. In three consecutive years (2009-2010-2011) OLAF had to recommit budget de-committed during the same year in order to meet Member States’ requests. In the period 2006-2013 Pericles funded 113 projects . Of these projects 72 originated from the competent authorities of Member States, while 41 were initiatives of the Commission/OLAF. Most of the actions implemented during that period were training and dissemination and activities involving staff exchanges. Target groups : · participants came from 83 countries . The majority of trainees (51%) were Member States nationals with clear predominance of staff from the euro area. European participants account for 73 % in total, while 16% of trainees were from Latin America (mainly Colombia, Peru and Argentina). While Africa was mainly represented by North African nationalities, the participation of Asian trainees was mainly limited to Chinese; · with respect to the professional background of participants , members from police forces, represent 64% of the total. The report stresses the differences among the various other categories of participants (36%), including a high participation from Central Banks (11%) and judicial staff (7%). Pericles actions took place both inside and outside the EU. In specific focus were Latin America (where Colombian and Peruvian organised crime represents a substantial threat for the euro) and neighbouring areas such as the South East of Europe (including Turkey and the Western Balkans), the Mediterranean region and the North East of Europe. Structural and legislative improvements: Pericles actions have led to: · a number of structural and legislative improvements in Member States and in third countries. Among others, Colombia, Peru and Argentina made a strong effort to establish structures against counterfeiting similar to the National Central Offices in the European Union; · assisting the acceding countries and newcomers in their efforts to apply the EU acquis in the specific area of protecting the euro; · being used by the Commission in the preparation of the proposal for a Directive on the protection of the euro and other currencies against counterfeiting by criminal law. Lastly, Regulation (EU) No 331/201417 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the “Pericles 2020” programme) was adopted on 11 March 2014. The Commission shall provide annual information on the results of the Programme to the European Parliament and to the Council. type: Follow-up document body: EC
events
  • date: 2001-05-22T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2001&nu_doc=248 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2001)0248 summary:
  • date: 2001-07-05T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2001-10-16T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 2001-10-16T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-362&language=EN title: A5-0362/2001
  • date: 2001-11-13T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2001-583 title: T5-0583/2001 summary:
  • date: 2001-12-17T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2001-12-17T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2001-12-21T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: title: Decision 2001/923 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32001D0923 title: OJ L 339 21.12.2001, p. 0050 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2001:339:TOC
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/ title: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
LIBE/5/14783
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32001D0923
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32001D0923
procedure/instrument
Old
Decision
New
  • Decision
  • Amended by 2005/0029(CNS) Amended by 2005/0030(CNS) Amended by 2006/0078(CNS) Repealed by 2011/0449(COD)
procedure/subject
Old
  • 5.20.02 Single currency, euro, euro area
  • 7.30.30.10 Action against counterfeiting
New
5.20.02
Single currency, euro, euro area
7.30.30.10
Action against counterfeiting
procedure/summary
  • Amended by
  • Amended by
  • Amended by
  • Repealed by
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
LIBE/5/14783
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
LIBE/5/14783
activities
  • date: 2001-05-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2001&nu_doc=248 title: COM(2001)0248 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52001PC0248(02):EN body: EC type: Legislative proposal published commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/ title: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)
  • date: 2001-07-05T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2001-06-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: NARANJO ESCOBAR Juan Andrés body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2001-08-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: TORRES MARQUES Helena body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2001-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: SCHMID Gerhard
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2001-06-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: NARANJO ESCOBAR Juan Andrés body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2001-08-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: TORRES MARQUES Helena body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2001-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: SCHMID Gerhard docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-362&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A5-0362/2001 date: 2001-10-16T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2001-11-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2001-583 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0583/2001 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2001-12-17T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Fisheries meeting_id: 2400
  • date: 2001-12-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2001-12-17T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2001-12-21T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32001D0923 title: Decision 2001/923 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2001:339:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ L 339 21.12.2001, p. 0050
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2001-06-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: NARANJO ESCOBAR Juan Andrés
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2001-08-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: TORRES MARQUES Helena
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2001-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: SCHMID Gerhard
links
European Commission
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/ title: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
LIBE/5/14783
reference
2001/0105(CNS)
subtype
Legislation
legal_basis
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 123-p4
stage_reached
Procedure completed
summary
instrument
Decision
title
Protection of the euro against counterfeiting, Pericles programme 2002-2005
type
CNS - Consultation procedure
final
subject