BETA


2001/0114(CNS) Combating illicit drug trafficking: criminal acts and penalties, minimum provisions. Framework Decision

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead LIBE OOSTLANDER Arie M. (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Former Responsible Committee LIBE OOSTLANDER Arie M. (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Former Responsible Committee LIBE OOSTLANDER Arie M. (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
Treaty on the European Union (after Amsterdam) M 031, Treaty on the European Union (after Amsterdam) M 034-p2

Events

2009/12/11
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The Commission presents a report on the implementation of Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA which sets out to establish minimum rules relating to the constituent elements of the offences of illicit trafficking in drugs and precursors, so as to allow a common approach at EU level to the fight against such trafficking.

The effectiveness of the efforts made depends essentially on the harmonisation of the national measures implementing the Framework Decision. The Commission notes that six Member States did not comply with their obligation to transmit information, and are not covered in the report. These are Cyprus, Spain, Greece, Italy, Malta and the United Kingdom. It also remarks on gaps regarding information from Member States regarding transposition of the legislation.

The report carries out an analysis of national implementing measures and notes the following:

Crimes linked to trafficking in drugs and precursors (Article 2): with regard to crimes linked to trafficking in drugs, the report notes that seven Member States have ambiguous legislation which does not guarantee full application of the Framework Decision in a sufficiently clear manner. With regard to crimes linked to trafficking in precursors, both Denmark and France stated that trafficking in precursors is not covered in their criminal law, but can fall within the offences of drug trafficking or aiding and abetting drug trafficking. The Commission has serious doubts about the compliance of these systems, particularly with respect to Article 3 on incitement. The Commission’s fear is that the absence of a separate offence of precursor trafficking will prevent this trafficking from being properly recorded, particularly with respect to attempt, incitement and aiding and abetting.

Penalties (Article 4): with regard to standard offences , the legislation of five Member States raises problems of interpretation, owing largely to a lack of information. In 12 Member States penalties are more than twice the range proposed by the Framework Decision, meaning that there are maximum penalties of six years or more or even life imprisonment. On the whole, legislative disparities between the Member States seem to remain unchanged. At the same time, maximum sentences are meaningful only in the context of proceedings actually initiated and penalties actually imposed by the courts. A comparison of judicial practice in each Member State would enable an assessment of the extent to which the objective of aligning national systems has been achieved in practice. In this context, the complexity of the Dutch system and the controversies relating to coffee shops merit particular attention. The Commission concludes that all the national legislation of which it has been informed is formally compliant, but expresses regret at the heterogeneous nature of this legislation and has concerns regarding its practical application.

Operation and effects on judicial cooperation : the difficulty of studying the operation of the Framework Decision and its effects on judicial cooperation lies primarily in the collection of data on judicial practice in the Member States. The Commission has relied on information from Eurojust and the European Judicial Network (EJN).

· Eurojust’s input : from 2004 to 2008, Eurojust recorded 771 drug trafficking cases, which showed a significant increase from 77 cases in 2004 to 207 in 2007. Drug cases account for 20% of the cases handled by Eurojust between 2004 and 2008. It is interesting to note that of 151 drug trafficking cases associated with one or more other crimes, 65 involved participation in a criminal organisation. The report shows that there has been a clear increase in judicial cooperation on drug trafficking between Member States through Eurojust since 2004. However, it is at this stage impossible to distinguish how the Framework Decision has affected such cooperation, or to measure its impact. This question was the focus of the questionnaire to the EJN.

· Input of the EJN : the contact points of the EJN in ten Member States replied to the Commission’s questionnaire. The general impression given by their data is that although specialists are familiar with the Framework Decision, they regard its importance as minor, because it has not resulted in many changes to national legislation. The question of the Framework Decision’s effect on cooperation remains open, because the Framework Decision does not concern judicial cooperation directly, and because no Member State seems to have a centralised system enabling it to measure trends in judicial cooperation in drug trafficking cases. The replies often point to a degree of uncertainty amongst specialists, for example in Finland, France and Portugal.

Conclusion : the report concludes that implementation of the Framework Decision has not been completely satisfactory. While the majority of Member States already had a number of the provisions in place, a number have also demonstrated – often in sketchy answers – that they have not always amended their existing legislation where the Framework Decision required it. Six Member States provided no information whatsoever. There has thus been little progress in the alignment of national measures in the fight against drug trafficking. The weak impact of the Framework Decision is confirmed by the EJN’s input. It is difficult to establish a link between the Framework Decision and the progress in judicial cooperation described by Eurojust. The Commission consequently invites those Member States which have submitted no information, or incomplete information, to comply with their obligations under the Framework Decision.

2009/12/11
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

This working document from the Commission services accompanies the Commission’s report on the implementation of Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA laying down minimum provisions on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking. The latter sets out sets out to establish minimum rules relating to the constituent elements of the offences of illicit trafficking in drugs and precursors, so as to allow a common approach at European Union level to the fight against such trafficking. The effectiveness of the efforts made depends essentially on the harmonisation of the national measures implementing the Framework Decision.

In accordance with Article 9 the Commission presents a report on the operation of the Framework Decision, including its operation and effects on international judicial cooperation. The Annex gives a detailed analysis on which the conclusions of the report are based.

2004/11/11
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE : to lay down minimum provisions on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking.

LEGISLATIVE ACT : Council Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA.

CONTENT : this Decision provides that each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the following intentional conduct when committed without right is punishable: - the production, manufacture, extraction, preparation, offering, offering for sale, distribution, sale, delivery on any terms whatsoever, brokerage, dispatch, dispatch in transit, transport, importation or exportation of drugs; - the cultivation of opium poppy, coca bush or cannabis plant; - the possession or purchase of drugs with a view to conducting one of the activities listed above; - the manufacture, transport or distribution of precursors, knowing that they are to be used in or for the illicit production or manufacture of drugs. The conduct described above will not be included in the scope of the Framework Decision when it is committed by its perpetrators exclusively for their own personal consumption as defined by national law.

By virtue of the principle of subsidiarity, EU action should focus on the most serious types of drug offence. The Decision states that the exclusion of certain types of behaviour as regards personal consumption from the scope of the Framework Decision does not constitute a Council guideline on how Member States should deal with these other cases in their national legislation.

With regard to penalties, the Decision provides as follows:

-Member States must ensure that the offences referred to above are punishable by criminal penalties of a maximum of at least between one and three years of imprisonment;

-this is increased to a maximum of at least between 5 and 10 years of imprisonment in certain prescribed circumstances, such as if the offence involves large quantities of drugs;

-there is a maximum of at least 10 years of deprivation of liberty, where the offence was committed within the framework of a criminal organisation as defined in Joint Action 98/733/JHA;

-Member States are allowed to make provision for reducing the penalties when the offender has supplied the competent authorities with valuable information;

- there are provisions enabling Member States to take measures to enable the confiscation of the proceeds of the offences referred to in the Framework Decision;

- Measures must be taken to ensure that legal persons can be held liable for the criminal offences referred to by this Framework Decision which are committed for their benefit.

ENTRY INTO FORCE : 12/11/2004.

2004/10/25
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
2004/10/25
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2004/10/25
   CSL - Council Meeting
2004/03/09
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament after reconsultation
2004/03/09
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2004/03/08
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2004/02/09
   EP - Committee final report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
Documents
2004/02/09
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2004/02/09
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
Documents
2004/02/06
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2004/02/02
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2003/12/09
   EP/CSL - Formal reconsultation of Parliament
2003/11/26
   EC - Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published
Documents
2002/11/28
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2002/11/28
   CSL - Council Meeting
2002/10/14
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2002/10/14
   CSL - Council Meeting
2002/06/13
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2002/06/13
   CSL - Council Meeting
2002/04/25
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2002/04/25
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2002/04/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2002/04/18
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2002/04/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2002/03/21
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2002/03/12
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2002/02/05
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, partial vote at 1st reading/single reading
2002/02/05
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2002/02/05
   EP - Report referred back to committee
2002/02/04
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2001/12/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2001/12/18
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2001/12/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2001/11/29
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2001/11/12
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2001/09/03
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2001/07/11
   EP - OOSTLANDER Arie M. (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2001/07/11
   EP - OOSTLANDER Arie M. (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2001/07/11
   EP - OOSTLANDER Arie M. (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2001/05/23
   EC - Legislative proposal
2001/05/23
   EC - Legislative proposal published

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/date
  • 2001-07-11T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur/0/date
2001-07-11T00:00:00
committees/1/date
  • 2001-07-11T00:00:00
committees/1/rapporteur/0/date
2001-07-11T00:00:00
committees/2/date
  • 2001-07-11T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur/0/date
2001-07-11T00:00:00
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-460&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0460_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-29
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0029_EN.html
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-123&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0123_EN.html
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-195
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0195_EN.html
docs/11/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2004-95&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2004-0095_EN.html
docs/12/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-150
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2004-0150_EN.html
docs/13/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0669/COM_COM(2009)0669_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0669/COM_COM(2009)0669_EN.pdf
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-460&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0460_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-29
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0029_EN.html
events/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-123&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0123_EN.html
events/9/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-195
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0195_EN.html
events/16/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2004-95&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2004-0095_EN.html
events/18/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-150
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2004-0150_EN.html
procedure/final/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:335:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2004:335:TOC
docs/13/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0669/COM_COM(2009)0669_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0669/COM_COM(2009)0669_EN.pdf
activities
  • date: 2001-05-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2001&nu_doc=259 title: COM(2001)0259 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52001PC0259:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2001-09-03T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2001-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: OOSTLANDER Arie M.
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2001-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: OOSTLANDER Arie M. docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-460&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A5-0460/2001 date: 2001-12-18T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2002-02-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20020204&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2002-02-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-29 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0029/2002 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2001-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: OOSTLANDER Arie M. docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-123&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A5-0123/2002 date: 2002-04-18T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2002-04-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-195 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0195/2002 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2436 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2436*&MEET_DATE=13/06/2002 type: Debate in Council title: 2436 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 2002-06-13T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2455 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2455*&MEET_DATE=14/10/2002 type: Debate in Council title: 2455 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 2002-10-14T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2469 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2469*&MEET_DATE=28/11/2002 type: Debate in Council title: 2469 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 2002-11-28T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2003-11-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=15102%2F03&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published title: 15102/2/2003 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published
  • date: 2003-12-09T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Formal reconsultation of Parliament
  • date: 2004-02-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2004-95&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation title: A5-0095/2004 body: unknown type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
  • date: 2004-02-09T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2001-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: OOSTLANDER Arie M. type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2004-03-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20040308&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2004-03-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-150 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0150/2004 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2004-10-25T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2613
  • date: 2004-10-25T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2004-10-25T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2004-11-11T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
commission
  • body: EC dg: Justice and Consumers commissioner: --
committees/0/associated
False
committees/0/date
Old
2001-07-11T00:00:00
New
  • 2001-07-11T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur/0
name
OOSTLANDER Arie M.
group
European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
abbr
PPE-DE
committees/0/rapporteur/0
group
PPE-DE
name
OOSTLANDER Arie M.
committees/0/responsible
True
committees/0/type
Responsible Committee
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2001-07-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: OOSTLANDER Arie M. group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2001-07-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: OOSTLANDER Arie M. group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2613 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2613*&MEET_DATE=25/10/2004 date: 2004-10-25T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2469 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2469*&MEET_DATE=28/11/2002 date: 2002-11-28T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2455 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2455*&MEET_DATE=14/10/2002 date: 2002-10-14T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2436 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2436*&MEET_DATE=13/06/2002 date: 2002-06-13T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2001-05-23T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2001&nu_doc=259 title: EUR-Lex url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:270E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 270 25.09.2001, p. 0144 E title: COM(2001)0259 summary: type: Legislative proposal body: EC
  • date: 2001-11-12T00:00:00 docs: title: PE302.285 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2001-11-29T00:00:00 docs: title: PE302.285/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2001-12-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-460&language=EN title: A5-0460/2001 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2002-02-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-29 title: T5-0029/2002 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2002:284E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 284 21.11.2002, p. 0023-0094 E summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, partial vote at 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2002-03-12T00:00:00 docs: title: PE311.018 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2002-03-21T00:00:00 docs: title: PE311.018/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2002-04-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-123&language=EN title: A5-0123/2002 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2002-04-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-195 title: T5-0195/2002 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2003:131E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 131 05.06.2003, p. 0015-0098 E summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2004-02-02T00:00:00 docs: title: PE338.598/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2004-02-06T00:00:00 docs: title: PE338.598 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2004-02-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2004-95&language=EN title: A5-0095/2004 type: Committee final report tabled for plenary, reconsultation body: EP
  • date: 2004-03-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-150 title: T5-0150/2004 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2004:102E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 102 28.04.2004, p. 0034-0479 E summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament after reconsultation body: EP
  • date: 2009-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0669/COM_COM(2009)0669_EN.pdf title: COM(2009)0669 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2009&nu_doc=669 title: EUR-Lex summary: The Commission presents a report on the implementation of Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA which sets out to establish minimum rules relating to the constituent elements of the offences of illicit trafficking in drugs and precursors, so as to allow a common approach at EU level to the fight against such trafficking. The effectiveness of the efforts made depends essentially on the harmonisation of the national measures implementing the Framework Decision. The Commission notes that six Member States did not comply with their obligation to transmit information, and are not covered in the report. These are Cyprus, Spain, Greece, Italy, Malta and the United Kingdom. It also remarks on gaps regarding information from Member States regarding transposition of the legislation. The report carries out an analysis of national implementing measures and notes the following: Crimes linked to trafficking in drugs and precursors (Article 2): with regard to crimes linked to trafficking in drugs, the report notes that seven Member States have ambiguous legislation which does not guarantee full application of the Framework Decision in a sufficiently clear manner. With regard to crimes linked to trafficking in precursors, both Denmark and France stated that trafficking in precursors is not covered in their criminal law, but can fall within the offences of drug trafficking or aiding and abetting drug trafficking. The Commission has serious doubts about the compliance of these systems, particularly with respect to Article 3 on incitement. The Commission’s fear is that the absence of a separate offence of precursor trafficking will prevent this trafficking from being properly recorded, particularly with respect to attempt, incitement and aiding and abetting. Penalties (Article 4): with regard to standard offences , the legislation of five Member States raises problems of interpretation, owing largely to a lack of information. In 12 Member States penalties are more than twice the range proposed by the Framework Decision, meaning that there are maximum penalties of six years or more or even life imprisonment. On the whole, legislative disparities between the Member States seem to remain unchanged. At the same time, maximum sentences are meaningful only in the context of proceedings actually initiated and penalties actually imposed by the courts. A comparison of judicial practice in each Member State would enable an assessment of the extent to which the objective of aligning national systems has been achieved in practice. In this context, the complexity of the Dutch system and the controversies relating to coffee shops merit particular attention. The Commission concludes that all the national legislation of which it has been informed is formally compliant, but expresses regret at the heterogeneous nature of this legislation and has concerns regarding its practical application. Operation and effects on judicial cooperation : the difficulty of studying the operation of the Framework Decision and its effects on judicial cooperation lies primarily in the collection of data on judicial practice in the Member States. The Commission has relied on information from Eurojust and the European Judicial Network (EJN). · Eurojust’s input : from 2004 to 2008, Eurojust recorded 771 drug trafficking cases, which showed a significant increase from 77 cases in 2004 to 207 in 2007. Drug cases account for 20% of the cases handled by Eurojust between 2004 and 2008. It is interesting to note that of 151 drug trafficking cases associated with one or more other crimes, 65 involved participation in a criminal organisation. The report shows that there has been a clear increase in judicial cooperation on drug trafficking between Member States through Eurojust since 2004. However, it is at this stage impossible to distinguish how the Framework Decision has affected such cooperation, or to measure its impact. This question was the focus of the questionnaire to the EJN. · Input of the EJN : the contact points of the EJN in ten Member States replied to the Commission’s questionnaire. The general impression given by their data is that although specialists are familiar with the Framework Decision, they regard its importance as minor, because it has not resulted in many changes to national legislation. The question of the Framework Decision’s effect on cooperation remains open, because the Framework Decision does not concern judicial cooperation directly, and because no Member State seems to have a centralised system enabling it to measure trends in judicial cooperation in drug trafficking cases. The replies often point to a degree of uncertainty amongst specialists, for example in Finland, France and Portugal. Conclusion : the report concludes that implementation of the Framework Decision has not been completely satisfactory. While the majority of Member States already had a number of the provisions in place, a number have also demonstrated – often in sketchy answers – that they have not always amended their existing legislation where the Framework Decision required it. Six Member States provided no information whatsoever. There has thus been little progress in the alignment of national measures in the fight against drug trafficking. The weak impact of the Framework Decision is confirmed by the EJN’s input. It is difficult to establish a link between the Framework Decision and the progress in judicial cooperation described by Eurojust. The Commission consequently invites those Member States which have submitted no information, or incomplete information, to comply with their obligations under the Framework Decision. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2009-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/1661/COM_SEC(2009)1661_EN.pdf title: SEC(2009)1661 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2009&nu_doc=1661 title: EUR-Lex summary: This working document from the Commission services accompanies the Commission’s report on the implementation of Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA laying down minimum provisions on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking. The latter sets out sets out to establish minimum rules relating to the constituent elements of the offences of illicit trafficking in drugs and precursors, so as to allow a common approach at European Union level to the fight against such trafficking. The effectiveness of the efforts made depends essentially on the harmonisation of the national measures implementing the Framework Decision. In accordance with Article 9 the Commission presents a report on the operation of the Framework Decision, including its operation and effects on international judicial cooperation. The Annex gives a detailed analysis on which the conclusions of the report are based. type: Follow-up document body: EC
events
  • date: 2001-05-23T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2001&nu_doc=259 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2001)0259 summary:
  • date: 2001-09-03T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2001-12-18T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 2001-12-18T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-460&language=EN title: A5-0460/2001
  • date: 2002-02-04T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20020204&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2002-02-05T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-29 title: T5-0029/2002 summary:
  • date: 2002-02-05T00:00:00 type: Report referred back to committee body: EP
  • date: 2002-04-18T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 2002-04-18T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-123&language=EN title: A5-0123/2002
  • date: 2002-04-25T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-195 title: T5-0195/2002 summary:
  • date: 2002-06-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2436*&MEET_DATE=13/06/2002 title: 2436
  • date: 2002-10-14T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2455*&MEET_DATE=14/10/2002 title: 2455
  • date: 2002-11-28T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2469*&MEET_DATE=28/11/2002 title: 2469 summary:
  • date: 2003-11-26T00:00:00 type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published body: EC docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=15102%2F03&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 15102/2/2003 summary:
  • date: 2003-12-09T00:00:00 type: Formal reconsultation of Parliament body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2004-02-09T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 2004-02-09T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2004-95&language=EN title: A5-0095/2004
  • date: 2004-03-08T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20040308&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2004-03-09T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-150 title: T5-0150/2004 summary:
  • date: 2004-10-25T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2004-10-25T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2004-11-11T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE : to lay down minimum provisions on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking. LEGISLATIVE ACT : Council Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA. CONTENT : this Decision provides that each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the following intentional conduct when committed without right is punishable: - the production, manufacture, extraction, preparation, offering, offering for sale, distribution, sale, delivery on any terms whatsoever, brokerage, dispatch, dispatch in transit, transport, importation or exportation of drugs; - the cultivation of opium poppy, coca bush or cannabis plant; - the possession or purchase of drugs with a view to conducting one of the activities listed above; - the manufacture, transport or distribution of precursors, knowing that they are to be used in or for the illicit production or manufacture of drugs. The conduct described above will not be included in the scope of the Framework Decision when it is committed by its perpetrators exclusively for their own personal consumption as defined by national law. By virtue of the principle of subsidiarity, EU action should focus on the most serious types of drug offence. The Decision states that the exclusion of certain types of behaviour as regards personal consumption from the scope of the Framework Decision does not constitute a Council guideline on how Member States should deal with these other cases in their national legislation. With regard to penalties, the Decision provides as follows: -Member States must ensure that the offences referred to above are punishable by criminal penalties of a maximum of at least between one and three years of imprisonment; -this is increased to a maximum of at least between 5 and 10 years of imprisonment in certain prescribed circumstances, such as if the offence involves large quantities of drugs; -there is a maximum of at least 10 years of deprivation of liberty, where the offence was committed within the framework of a criminal organisation as defined in Joint Action 98/733/JHA; -Member States are allowed to make provision for reducing the penalties when the offender has supplied the competent authorities with valuable information; - there are provisions enabling Member States to take measures to enable the confiscation of the proceeds of the offences referred to in the Framework Decision; - Measures must be taken to ensure that legal persons can be held liable for the criminal offences referred to by this Framework Decision which are committed for their benefit. ENTRY INTO FORCE : 12/11/2004.
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
LIBE/5/14926;LIBE/5/16028;LIBE/5/20515
New
  • LIBE/5/14926
  • LIBE/5/16028
  • LIBE/5/20515
procedure/final/title
Old
OJ L 335 11.11.2004, p. 0008-0011
New
OJ L 335 11.11.2004, p. 0008-0011
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2004:335:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:335:SOM:EN:HTML
procedure/instrument
Old
Decision
New
  • Decision
  • Amended by 2013/0304(COD)
procedure/subject
Old
  • 7.30.30.04 Action to combat drugs and drug-trafficking
New
7.30.30.04
Action to combat drugs and drug-trafficking
procedure/summary
  • Amended by
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:335:SOM:EN:HTML
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2004:335:TOC
activities
  • date: 2001-05-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2001&nu_doc=259 celexid: CELEX:52001PC0259:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2001)0259 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice
  • date: 2001-09-03T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2001-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: OOSTLANDER Arie M.
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2001-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: OOSTLANDER Arie M. docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-460&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A5-0460/2001 date: 2001-12-18T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2002-02-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20020204&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2002-02-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-29 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0029/2002 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2001-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: OOSTLANDER Arie M. docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-123&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A5-0123/2002 date: 2002-04-18T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2002-04-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-195 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0195/2002 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2436 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2436*&MEET_DATE=13/06/2002 type: Debate in Council title: 2436 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 2002-06-13T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2455 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2455*&MEET_DATE=14/10/2002 type: Debate in Council title: 2455 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 2002-10-14T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2469 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2469*&MEET_DATE=28/11/2002 type: Debate in Council title: 2469 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 2002-11-28T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2003-11-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=15102%2F03&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published title: 15102/2/2003 type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice
  • date: 2003-12-09T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Formal reconsultation of Parliament
  • date: 2004-02-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2004-95&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation title: A5-0095/2004 body: unknown type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
  • date: 2004-02-09T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2001-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: OOSTLANDER Arie M. type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2004-03-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20040308&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2004-03-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-150 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0150/2004 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2004-10-25T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2613
  • date: 2004-10-25T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2004-10-25T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2004-11-11T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2001-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: OOSTLANDER Arie M.
links
European Commission
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
LIBE/5/14926;LIBE/5/16028;LIBE/5/20515
reference
2001/0114(CNS)
instrument
Decision
legal_basis
stage_reached
Procedure completed
summary
Amended by
subtype
Legislation
title
Combating illicit drug trafficking: criminal acts and penalties, minimum provisions. Framework Decision
type
CNS - Consultation procedure
final
subject
7.30.30.04 Action to combat drugs and drug-trafficking