BETA


2001/0166(COD) Labour market statistics: labour cost index

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Former Responsible Committee ECON MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Former Committee Opinion EMPL
Former Committee Opinion JURI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 285

Events

2023/01/23
   EC - Follow-up document
2020/12/22
   EC - Follow-up document
2019/02/28
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The Commission presents a report on Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the labour cost index (LCI), which establishes a common framework for Member States to produce comparable LCIs and provide them to the Commission. The report examines the LCI data provided to the Commission for the reference quarters from the third quarter of 2016 (2016-Q3) to the first quarter of 2018 (2018-Q1). The LCI measures quarterly changes in total hourly labour costs borne by employers, making it possible to monitor developments in the cost pressure arising from the production factor ‘labour’. The Commission focuses on the following criteria for assessing the quality of the LCI: relevance, completeness, punctuality, accuracy, comparability and coherence.

General progress since the last report

The report states that overall, the quality of the Member States’ LCIs and the EU aggregates has continued to improve since the previous report in 2017 – in particular as regards the punctuality of Member States’ transmissions, which is now almost completely satisfactory.

A new version of the Statistical Data and Metadata eXchange (SDMX) data structures makes it possible to collect new optional variables, such as quarterly labour costs and quarterly number of hours worked. The same SDMX data structures have been implemented to transmit LCI data to the European Central Bank (ECB). Thanks to SDMX standardisation, a new automatic validation tool (STRUVAL) has been implemented that notifies Member States of any IT issue detected in their LCI transmissions.

Furthermore, the programmes used to validate, aggregate and disseminate LCI data have been entirely re-engineered, making it possible to: (i) improve the reliability of the production chain; (ii) ensure consistency between totals and components by design; and (iii) produce new indicators such as annual growth rates and the size of the non-wage component.

Quality of data

Relevance: in 2017, the Commission (Eurostat) started to publish annual estimates of hourly labour costs by NACE Rev. 2 section, on the basis of labour cost survey levels and LCI trends. In addition, it has started disseminating the annual growth rate of hourly labour cost levels and the proportion of total labour costs made up of non-wage costs. The Commission has received positive feedback on the publication of these estimates and will continue to produce the annual labour costs with a NACE Rev. 2 breakdown.

Completeness: in general, the availability and quality of the LCI has continued to improve. Eurostat received calendar-adjusted data and calendar- and seasonally adjusted data from all Member States. All except Denmark and Sweden (which were granted derogations) also delivered non-seasonally adjusted data. Despite the improved coverage of seasonally adjusted data, it was decided, to keep calendar-adjusted data as headline figures.

Punctuality: Member States’ punctuality in sending data to the Commission has improved since the previous report as data were transmitted on time by Greece while the transmissions of Croatia recorded a delay of 1 day maximum, over the whole reference period.

Accuracy: revisions of the EU headline figure (year-on-year growth rate) have exceeded 0.2 percentage points (pp) twice (upwards in both cases) since the first quarter of 2016. This was caused by major revisions being recorded in the United Kingdom during the transmission of March 2018. Only two other countries (Germany and the Netherlands) recorded noticeable revisions.

Comparability: using the new IT programmes, Eurostat’s policy is systematically to detect inconsistencies of 0.1 pp or more between totals and components, and to report them to the country concerned in a validation report. The total LCI is then recalculated on the basis of the wage and non-wage components (indirect approach). Indices are thus calculated using a harmonised approach for all Member States, so as to ensure greater comparability.

Coherence with national accounts figures: one of the areas that continue to receive attention is the coherence of the LCI with other statistics on labour costs, in particular the quarterly national accounts data. Eurostat carried out a quality exercise for NACE Rev. 2 sections B to S aggregates for each Member State, using non-seasonally adjusted LCI data, except for Denmark and Sweden, for which calendar-adjusted data were available. The median annual growth rate of the LCI was compared with that of the hourly compensation of employees over 10 quarters. Variations of more than 1 pp were considered to warrant further analysis. This was the case for Croatia (5.1 pp), Greece (2.2 pp), Romania (2.1 pp), Ireland (1.4 pp), Malta (1.2 pp) and Slovenia (1.1 pp). The results of the analysis will be followed up with those Member States, in particular with respect to data on hours worked.

The Commission will continue to monitor compliance and data quality on a regular basis, using the data delivered and other national documentation, including quality reports.

2017/02/14
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 on the labour cost index (LCI), the Commission presented a report on the quality of the labour cost index data for the reference quarters ranging from third quarter 2014 to second quarter 2016.

The report focused on improvements in relevance, completeness, punctuality, accuracy and comparability , and examines the consistency between the labour cost index and the national accounts. It also deals with the problem of data not being supplied by the Member States within the set deadlines, as well as the impact of this situation on the quality of published European aggregates.

General progress : the main findings of the report were as follows:

· the use of the Statistical Data and Metadata eXchange (SDMX) standard (worldwide reference for sharing statistical information) for nomenclatures and variables used in the labour cost index data has been extended to all Member States . The latest SDMX improvements are in the process of being implemented and deployment of the new version is expected to take place in the next reference quarter;

· the quality reports submitted by the Member States have been migrated to a new version of the metadata manager of the European Statistical System Metadata Handler and made available to all users;

· the overall quality of statistics on the labour cost index and some technical aspects were evaluated in a workshop on this topic organised by Eurostat and proposals for improvements were agreed.

At the October 2016 working group meeting on labor market statistics, countries not using the indirect method for seasonal adjustment (wages/non-wages and NACE aggregates) and whose data presented sizeable inconsistencies between components and total, agreed to implement the indirect method by mid-2017. The consistency of labour cost index data is expected to improve further.

Eurostat has also started publishing annual estimates of the hourly labour cost levels by NACE sections, starting from 2012 onwards, based on both labour cost survey levels and labour cost index trends.

The Commission received positive comments on the publication of these estimates.

Data quality assessment : the report found that overall the quality of the labour cost indices of the Member States and of the EU has continued to improve since the previous report, published in 2014. Eurostat received working-day adjusted data and seasonally and working-day adjusted data from all Member States.

Member States’ punctuality remained good except for Greece whose labour cost index data were still behind the established deadlines.

Eurostat held a bilateral meeting with the Greek statistical office in May 2016, during which a roadmap for tackling these structural issues was agreed.

The Commission will continue to monitor issues relating to non-compliance and data quality on a regular basis. Where no or insufficient improvement is seen, the Commission will closely follow-up with the competent national statistical authorities.

2015/02/03
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The Commission presented a report on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the labour cost index (LCI).

Aims of the LCI and amending Regulations : Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 concerning the labour cost index establishes a common framework for the production and provision to the Commission of comparable labour cost indices by Member States.

This Regulation has been amended on several occasions:

in July 2003: Regulation (EC) No 1216/2003, setting out in greater detail the procedures that Member States must follow when sending their indices to the Commission, the seasonal adjustments to be made to the indices and the content of the national quality reports; in March 2007: Regulation (EC) No 224/2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 1216/2003 and extends the scope of the labour cost index to cover the economic activities of non-market services; in August 2007: Regulation (EC) No 973/2007 which amended a number of regulations on specific statistical domains, including the labour cost index, in order to be able to implement the statistical classification of economic activities set out in NACE Revision 2.

Objectives of the report : p ursuant to Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 450/2003, the Commission must submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council every two years. The report should, in particular, examine the quality of the labour cost index data .

This report focuses on:

the relevance of the data, its accuracy, the punctuality of delivery of data, its accessibility and clarity, its comparability, consistency and completeness.

This report will therefore focus on improvements made in relation to relevance and coverage, and will address the issues of the consistency of the data with national accounts data and the comparability of working-day adjusted data. Particular attention is given to the problem of data not being provided by Member States within the deadlines set, and the consequences of this for the quality of the published European aggregates.

In general, the availability and quality of the labour cost index has continued to improve . Seasonally adjusted data are now available from all Member States except Ireland and Croatia. National quality reports for the reference year 2013 were provided by all Member States except Greece and Croatia, and have been made available to the public.

Consistency of data : on e of the areas that continues to receive attention is the consistency of the labour cost index with other statistics on labour costs, in particular the quarterly national accounts data. This has been analysed from both a theoretical and an empirical point of view and the results have been discussed with Member States. Moreover, the Commission (Eurostat) will organise a workshop with Member States in 2015 at which they will assess and try to further improve the overall quality of statistics on labour costs.

The Commission (Eurostat) has also improved the availability of estimates of hourly labour costs by publishing averages for a one-year period that are largely based on the labour cost index and can be produced soon after the end of the reference period. As a result, national annual labour cost statistics, which used to be collected under a gentlemen’s agreement, are no longer being provided by Member States for publication by the Commission.

Other main conclusions : overall, the quality of the labour cost index has continued to improve since the previous report (see the summary dated 12.02.2013). The improvements in Member States’ punctuality in delivering data and in the completeness of the data are particularly noteworthy. Moreover, the full availability of aggregates has added to the overall usefulness of the labour cost index.

User needs are being better met thanks to the publication of yearly estimates of labour costs based on labour cost index data. Delivery of data by Member States is close to satisfactory . With the exception of Greece, no country was systematically late in providing data to the Commission.

In recent years, the Commission (Eurostat) has regularly urged Member States to make greater efforts to conform to requirements in this area. The Commission will continue to monitor as-yet-unresolved issues relating to non-compliance and data quality on a regular basis, using the data delivered and other national documentation, including quality reports. Where no or insufficient improvement is seen, the relevant national authorities will be approached and the Commission will take the necessary measures to enforce compliance.

2013/02/12
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

In accordance with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 450/2003, the Commission presents a report on labour cost index (LCI) data from reference quarter 2010Q3 to quarter 2012Q2.

The major changes introduced in 2009 relating to the introduction of the new NACE Rev.2 classification and the coverage of non-market services were described in the 2010 report . Since the last report, progress has been made on a number of issues. Generally speaking, the availability and quality of the labour cost index (LCI) continued to improve.

The improvements in relevance and completeness are particularly noteworthy. Moreover, the full availability of aggregates (including the NACE Rev. 2 sections O to S) has added to the overall usefulness of the LCI. The publication of yearly estimates of labour-cost levels based on the LCI provides users with significant new added value.

However, the report discusses certain matters which should be improved, and highlights the fact that the punctuality of data transmissions from Member States has not improved since the previous report delivered in 2011 , although no country except for Greece was systematically late. The Commission states that Member States should continue channelling resources into measures to achieve punctual data transmissions. Where the desired improvements are not taking place as planned, the relevant national authorities will be approached and the Commission will take the necessary measures to enforce compliance.

2011/03/08
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The Commission presents a report on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the labour cost index (LCI) Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 creates a common framework for producing and transmitting comparable labour cost indices in the European Union. The Commission (Eurostat) publishes a quarterly news release on the hourly labour cost index. The Regulation provides that the Commission must submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council every two years. The report should look in particular at the quality of the data transmitted. Annual national quality reports are compulsory under the LCI Regulation.

The report notes that overall, the degree of compliance with the LCI Regulation has continued to increase since the previous report in 2008. Most Member States comply with its provisions. Member States have continued to channel resources into implementing actions to achieve more comparable and timely index series. This has clearly raised the overall quality and thus increased the usefulness of the data.

Since comparability and completeness have improved considerably, the report focuses on accuracy, timeliness and coherence.

Accuracy: there are concerns regarding accuracy with various aspects of the LCI. Generally, they are due to shortcomings of the source data and can lead to high volatility of the LCI series. In principle, accuracy problems are discussed by the Member States affected in the yearly quality report, and the Commission (Eurostat) monitors the progress made or planned in the implementation of better sources . At the moment, three Member States are affected by accuracy problems. Germany and Hungary currently do not use source data that would allow them to comply fully with the regulation. LCI data delivered by Greece often show unexplainable growth rates which are difficult to reconcile with the developments in the labour market. Timeliness: this has continued to improve since the last report in 2008. Nevertheless, two Member States (Belgium and Ireland) failed to deliver the data on time. The Commission asked these countries to take the appropriate measures to ensure that the deadlines for the submission of the data are respected in the future. Coherence : in the annual quality report, Member States are asked to compare the growth rates of the LCI with those of hourly compensation of employees in national accounts (ESA95 definition). Both data collections measure the same phenomenon with divergences in the definitions, exhaustiveness of the sources and methodology for calculating the growth rates. Since not all Member States produce quarterly data for hourly compensation of employees (national accounts data), a complete overview of coherence is not possible. Furthermore, as national accounts still use the NACE rev.1 classification while the LCI uses NACE rev.2, the comparison is restricted to a very small number of aggregated NACE sections.

The Commission will be monitoring the remaining non-compliance and quality issues regularly through the data delivered and other national documentation. Where the desired or planned improvements are not advancing appropriately, the relevant national authorities will be approached, and the Commission will take the necessary action to enforce compliance.

2009/02/03
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

This report from the Commission assesses the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 of 27 February 2003 concerning the labour cost index (LCI). It highlights progress made since the last report in 2006.

The report recalls that labour costs are an important factor in the analysis of short- and medium-term economic development. The timely production of a labour cost index for the European Union as well as the Euro zone is therefore considered by the Commission and the European Central Bank to be of the utmost importance for assessing the inflationary pressure that may arise from developments in the labour market. Moreover, it notes that the labour cost index is important for the social partners in wage negotiations and for the Commission itself in monitoring short-term developments in labour costs.

Overall, the report notes that the degree of compliance with the Regulation has increased since the previous report in 2006. All Member States have continued to channel resources into implementing actions to achieve more comparable and timely index series. This has clearly raised the overall quality and thus increased the usefulness of the data.

In the meantime, all missing back data series as well as missing working-day and seasonally adjusted series have been delivered. The timeliness of data delivery has improved, and the number of Member States with accuracy problems has decreased. However, nine Member States still have shortcomings concerning one or more quality aspects of the LCI. For three Member States these shortcomings are due to the incidental late delivery of data only, and therefore of a transitory nature. Six Member States have more serious problems with the accuracy aspect of quality. This compares favourably to the situation in 2006, when 10 Member States reported accuracy problems.

The Commission (Eurostat) has urged Member States to step up their improvement efforts. The Commission will be monitoring the remaining non-compliance and quality issues regularly through the data delivered and other national documentation. Where the desired or planned improvements have not advanced appropriately, the corresponding national authorities will be contacted, and the Commission will take the necessary actions to enforce compliance.

2006/12/14
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The Commission presents its report for 2006 on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 concerning the labour cost index (LCI), which establishes a common framework for the production, transmission and evaluation of comparable labour cost indices in the Community. Eurostat publishes a quarterly news release on the labour cost index. Article 13 of the Regulation requires the submission of biennial reports on the implementation of the Regulation. These reports must evaluate in particular the quality of the transmitted LCI series data and the quality of the transmitted back data.

Labour costs are generally regarded as an important factor in the analysis of short- and medium-term economic development. The timely production of a labour cost index in the euro area is thus considered by the Commission and the European Central Bank to be of the utmost importance for assessing the inflationary pressure that may arise from short-term developments in the labour market. The labour cost index is also important for the social partners in wage negotiation and for the Commission itself in monitoring short-term developments in labour costs. This report focuses particularly on accuracy , timeliness, comparability , and completeness .

General progress since last report: s ince the implementation of reporting in 2004, substantial progress has been achieved, especially in the general availability of the labour cost index. By now, all EU Member States have implemented the LCI and the data are delivered regularly to the Commission although not necessarily within the mandatory deadlines. The availability of the LCI from all EU Member States allows the European Union aggregates to be compiled and makes it possible to compare with sufficient accuracy the development of the hourly labour costs between the Member States. There are, however, a number of quality issues which still require extra effort from certain Member States in order to complete the harmonisation process. Just as the Member States have implemented the necessary facilities for the production of the LCI, the Commission (Eurostat) has also implemented a production system that allows reception, verification, manipulation, storage and dissemination of the Labour Cost Index data in a timely manner. These processes became fully operational in 2005.

Quality evaluation: t he following Member States have undertaken all necessary measures to comply fully with the Regulation: Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Spain, Latvia, Lithuania Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovak Republic and the United Kingdom. However, the Netherlands has not delivered the regulatory quality report. The quality evaluation for the Netherlands is therefore still uncertain and a full guarantee on quality cannot be given. Also, even if the quality is evaluated as sufficient for the current part of the LCI series, shortcomings with historical time series still remain in two Member States: Latvia and the UK.

Member States with quality shortcomings: a fter inspection, the Commission found that the quality of the LCI is not sufficient in all respects to fulfil the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 for the following Member States: Belgium, Greece, France, Ireland, Italy, Cyprus, Hungary, Malta, Finland and Sweden. The report looks at deficiencies in reporting for each country in turn. These are mainly related to the accuracy element of quality. Definition and coverage of some of the aspects of the LCI do not fully correspond to the legal requirement. Insufficient timeliness, missing working-day and seasonally adjusted series and incomplete historical series also play their part in lowering the quality of the LCI series. Two Member States have not completed the regulatory quality reporting. The Commission (Eurostat) will be monitoring the remaining non-compliance and quality issues regularly through the data delivered and other national documentation. Where desired or planned improvements have not advanced appropriately, the corresponding national authorities will be contacted.

Recent actions by the Commission and Member States: i n 2006, the Commission (Eurostat) together with the Member States completed the evaluation of the feasibility studies on extending the scope of the LCI to cover economic activities such as public administration, education and health care (NACE Rev.1 sections L to O) and to develop an index excluding irregular bonuses. The draft Commission Regulation for the extended data collection has been introduced in November 2006. A decision over an index excluding irregular bonuses has not yet been taken as investigations showed that more efforts are still needed in the definitions and especially searching the means making this sub-index operational with acceptable quality. Further issues concerning the relevance and accuracy of the LCI have been given preliminary consideration.

As the EU labour cost index series are being used frequently in monitoring labour cost developments for the EU and its Member States, it is of the utmost importance that the national authorities provide data of the highest quality. However, it should be underlined that the situation has improved substantially since the Regulation became fully applicable at the beginning of 2005. All Member States - not only those applying the Regulation fully - have directed resources into implementing actions to achieve more comparable and timely index series. This has clearly raised the overall quality and thus increased the usefulness of the data.

2004/12/27
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The Commission presents its report on the on the implementation of Regulation 450/2003/EC concerning the labour cost index. After the endorsement of the Regulation, the Member States have begun to implement its requirements. Most Member States continued to develop provisional index series (which had already been disseminated for several years by Eurostat) to become final indices, whereas other countries began to consider possible alternative approaches. For some countries it was the first time they had had to develop a labour cost index.

The report shows that all necessary measures to fully comply with the Regulation have been undertaken by the Czech Republic, Denmark, Lithuania, Hungary, Portugal and Slovak Republic. Another group of Member States are fully implementing the Regulation apart from the items that are subject to the transition period. This group includes Germany, Spain, the Netherlands and Austria.

Fifteen Member States are still in a preparatory phase of the implementation of the Regulation. Six of those have agreed transitional arrangements for the full implementation of the Regulation.

The remaining items to implement the Regulation mainly concern the full breakdown of the data by economic activities, back data and the (seasonal) adjustments of the series. Producing an index in a timely manner in 70 days also requires adjustments to the production process. For some countries the search for, and testing of, the most suitable data sources is still going on.

2003/07/07
   EU - Implementing legislative act
2003/03/13
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to establish a common framework for the establishment of labour cost indices. COMMUNITY MEASURE: Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the labour cost index. CONTENT: this Regulation follows on from the fact that a range of statistics, of which labour cost indices form an essential part, is required for an understanding of the inflationary process and the dynamics of the labour market. Furthermore, the Action Plan on Economic and Monetary Union statistical requirements, produced by the European Commission (Eurostat) in collaboration with the European Central Bank, identifies as a priority the development of a legal basis covering short-term labour cost statistics. The objective of this Regulation is to establish a common framework for the production, transmission and evaluation of comparable labour cost indices in the Community. Member States must produce labour cost indices for the economic activities defined in the Regulation. The provisions include a definition of the labour cost index (LCI.) The labour costs are the total quarterly costs incurred by the employer in the employment of labour. The labour cost items and total staff employed are defined by reference to Regulation 530/1999 and its implementing legislation. The hours worked are defined by reference to Regulation 2223/96. The main provisions of this Regulation are as follows: - this Regulation applies to all activities defined in sections C to O of NACE Rev.1. The inclusion of economic activities defined by NACE Rev.1 sections L, M, N and O in the scope of the Regulation are to be determined in accordance with the procedure and the feasibility studies defined in the Regulation. The LCI will represent all statistical units as defined in Council Regulation 696/93. - the Regulation makes provision for the breakdown of variables. LCI must be provided separately for the three labour cost categories identified below: a) total labour costs; b) wages and salaries, defined by reference to Regulation 1726/1999; c) employers' social contributions plus taxes paid by the employer less subsidies received by the employer; - an index estimating total labour costs, excluding bonuses, and based on the NACE Rev.1 classification, must be provided, taking into account the feasibility studies defined in the Regulation. - the data for the LCI will first be compiled for the first quarter of 2003, and thereafter for each quarter (ending on 31 March, 30 June, 30 September and 31 December of each year). - Member States must provide back data covering the period from the first quarter of 1996 to the fourth quarter of 2002. The back data will be provided for each of the NACE Rev.1 sections C to K and for the labour cost items mentioned. This must be sent to Eurostat at the same time as the LCI for the first quarter of 2003. - Member States must transmit the data required to Eurostat within 70 days of the end of the reference period. - Transition periods may be granted under the specified procedure for not more than two years from the date of entry into force of the Regulation. - The Commission will institute a series of feasibility studies, to be undertaken by the Member States, in particular by those that cannot provide the data for NACE Rev. 1 sections L, M, N, and O or the breakdown of the index estimating total labour costs, excluding bonuses. - the Commission will be assisted by the Statistical Programme Committee instituted by Article 1 of Decision 89/382/EEC, Euratom. The Commission must submit a report on the implementation of the Regulation to the European Parliament and the Council every two years. This report must evaluate in particular the quality of the transmitted LCI series data and the quality of the transmitted back data. The first report will be submitted no later than 31 December of the year following the entry into force of this Regulation. It will refer only to the actions executed by Member States to prepare the application of this Regulation. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 27/02/2003.

2003/02/27
   CSL - Final act signed
2003/02/27
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2002/12/18
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 2nd reading
2002/12/18
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
Documents
2002/11/28
   EP - Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
Documents
2002/11/28
   EP - Vote in committee, 2nd reading
2002/11/27
   EP - Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
Documents
2002/10/11
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading
2002/10/08
   EC - Commission communication on Council's position
2002/09/23
   CSL - Council position
2002/09/23
   CSL - Council statement on its position
Documents
2002/09/23
   CSL - Council Meeting
2002/09/22
   CSL - Council position published
Documents
2002/02/28
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2002/02/28
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Documents
2002/02/27
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2001/12/19
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2001/12/19
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
2001/12/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Documents
2001/11/29
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
2001/10/11
   ECB - Document attached to the procedure
2001/09/11
   EP - MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2001/09/11
   EP - MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2001/09/03
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2001/07/23
   EC - Legislative proposal
2001/07/22
   EC - Legislative proposal published

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/2
date
2001-10-18T00:00:00
docs
title: PE304.738
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/3
date
2001-11-22T00:00:00
docs
title: PE304.738/AM
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/10
date
2003-07-07T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Implementing legislative act
body
EU
docs/10
date
2002-11-18T00:00:00
docs
title: PE315.008/AM
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/10/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:169:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2003:169:TOC
docs/11
date
2004-12-27T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/11/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0833/COM_COM(2004)0833_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0833/COM_COM(2004)0833_EN.pdf
docs/12
date
2002-11-28T00:00:00
docs
title: PE315.008
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/14
date
2003-07-07T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Implementing legislative act
body
EU
docs/15
date
2004-12-27T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/16
date
2015-02-03T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/16/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0042/COM_COM(2015)0042_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0042/COM_COM(2015)0042_EN.pdf
docs/20
date
2015-02-03T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/20
date
2023-01-23T00:00:00
docs
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
events/0/date
Old
2001-07-23T00:00:00
New
2001-07-22T00:00:00
events/3/date
Old
2001-12-19T00:00:00
New
2001-12-18T00:00:00
events/6/date
Old
2002-09-23T00:00:00
New
2002-09-22T00:00:00
events/9/date
Old
2002-11-28T00:00:00
New
2002-11-27T00:00:00
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1492)(documentyear:2001)(documentlanguage:EN)
New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1492)(documentyear:2001)(documentlanguage:EN)
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0461_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0461_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0078_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0078_EN.html
docs/11
date
2002-11-28T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0420_EN.html title: A5-0420/2002
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs/11/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0420_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0420_EN.html
docs/12
date
2002-11-28T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0420_EN.html title: A5-0420/2002
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs/13/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0615_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0615_EN.html
docs/15/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0833/COM_COM(2004)0833_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0833/COM_COM(2004)0833_EN.pdf
docs/16/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0801/COM_COM(2006)0801_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0801/COM_COM(2006)0801_EN.pdf
docs/18/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0102/COM_COM(2011)0102_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0102/COM_COM(2011)0102_EN.pdf
docs/22/docs/1
url
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2019&nu_doc=0113
title
EUR-Lex
docs/23
date
2020-12-22T00:00:00
docs
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/3
date
2001-12-19T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0461_EN.html title: A5-0461/2001
events/3
date
2001-12-19T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0461_EN.html title: A5-0461/2001
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20020227&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20020227&type=CRE
events/5
date
2002-02-28T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0078_EN.html title: T5-0078/2002
summary
events/5
date
2002-02-28T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0078_EN.html title: T5-0078/2002
summary
events/9/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0420_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0420_EN.html
events/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0615_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0615_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel date: 2001-09-11T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2001-09-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel date: 2001-09-11T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2001-09-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-461&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0461_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-78
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0078_EN.html
docs/9/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2002/1080/COM_SEC(2002)1080_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2002/1080/COM_SEC(2002)1080_EN.pdf
docs/12/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-420&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0420_EN.html
docs/13/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-615
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0615_EN.html
docs/14/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2003:169:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:169:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/15/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0833/COM_COM(2004)0833_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0833/COM_COM(2004)0833_EN.pdf
docs/16/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0801/COM_COM(2006)0801_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0801/COM_COM(2006)0801_EN.pdf
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-461&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2001-0461_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-78
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0078_EN.html
events/9/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-420&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0420_EN.html
events/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-615
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0615_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2001-07-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2001&nu_doc=418 title: COM(2001)0418 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52001PC0418:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home title: Eurostat type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2001-09-03T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2001-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: V/ALE name: MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2001-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: V/ALE name: MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-461&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A5-0461/2001 date: 2001-12-19T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2002-02-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20020227&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2002-02-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-78 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0078/2002 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2448 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=10803%2F02&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Council position published title: 10803/2/2002 council: Agriculture and Fisheries date: 2002-09-23T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2002-10-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2001-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: V/ALE name: MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2001-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: V/ALE name: MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-420&language=EN type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading title: A5-0420/2002 date: 2002-11-28T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading
  • date: 2002-12-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-615 type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading title: T5-0615/2002 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
  • date: 2003-02-27T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2003-02-27T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2003-03-13T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32003R0450 title: Regulation 2003/450 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2003:069:TOC title: OJ L 069 13.03.2003, p. 0001-0005
commission
  • body: EC dg: Eurostat commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2001-09-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ECON
date
2001-09-11T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
rapporteur
group: V/ALE name: MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2001-09-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/2
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs and Internal Market
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs and Internal Market
committee
JURI
committees/3
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 2448 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2448*&MEET_DATE=23/09/2002 date: 2002-09-23T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2001-07-23T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2001&nu_doc=418 title: EUR-Lex url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:304E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 304 30.10.2001, p. 0184 E title: COM(2001)0418 summary: type: Legislative proposal body: EC
  • date: 2001-10-11T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:295:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 295 20.10.2001, p. 0005 title: BCE(2001)0033 summary: type: Document attached to the procedure body: ECB
  • date: 2001-10-18T00:00:00 docs: title: PE304.738 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2001-11-22T00:00:00 docs: title: PE304.738/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2001-11-29T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1492)(documentyear:2001)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES1492/2001 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2002:048:TOC title: OJ C 048 21.02.2002, p. 0107 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
  • date: 2001-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-461&language=EN title: A5-0461/2001 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2002-02-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-78 title: T5-0078/2002 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2002:293E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 293 28.11.2002, p. 0020-0074 E summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2002-09-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=10803%2F02&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 10803/2/2002 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2002:269E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 269 05.11.2002, p. 0010 E summary: type: Council position body: CSL
  • date: 2002-09-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11660%2F02&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 11660/2002 type: Council statement on its position body: CSL
  • date: 2002-10-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2002/1080/COM_SEC(2002)1080_EN.pdf title: SEC(2002)1080 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2002&nu_doc=1080 title: EUR-Lex summary: type: Commission communication on Council's position body: EC
  • date: 2002-11-18T00:00:00 docs: title: PE315.008/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2002-11-28T00:00:00 docs: title: PE315.008 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2002-11-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-420&language=EN title: A5-0420/2002 type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading body: EP
  • date: 2002-12-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-615 title: T5-0615/2002 title: OJ C 031 05.02.2004, p. 0160-0170 E summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP
  • date: 2003-07-07T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32003R1216 title: 32003R1216 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2003:169:TOC title: OJ L 169 08.07.2003, p. 0037-0043 summary: type: Implementing legislative act body: EU
  • date: 2004-12-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0833/COM_COM(2004)0833_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0833 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=833 title: EUR-Lex summary: The Commission presents its report on the on the implementation of Regulation 450/2003/EC concerning the labour cost index. After the endorsement of the Regulation, the Member States have begun to implement its requirements. Most Member States continued to develop provisional index series (which had already been disseminated for several years by Eurostat) to become final indices, whereas other countries began to consider possible alternative approaches. For some countries it was the first time they had had to develop a labour cost index. The report shows that all necessary measures to fully comply with the Regulation have been undertaken by the Czech Republic, Denmark, Lithuania, Hungary, Portugal and Slovak Republic. Another group of Member States are fully implementing the Regulation apart from the items that are subject to the transition period. This group includes Germany, Spain, the Netherlands and Austria. Fifteen Member States are still in a preparatory phase of the implementation of the Regulation. Six of those have agreed transitional arrangements for the full implementation of the Regulation. The remaining items to implement the Regulation mainly concern the full breakdown of the data by economic activities, back data and the (seasonal) adjustments of the series. Producing an index in a timely manner in 70 days also requires adjustments to the production process. For some countries the search for, and testing of, the most suitable data sources is still going on. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2006-12-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0801/COM_COM(2006)0801_EN.pdf title: COM(2006)0801 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=801 title: EUR-Lex summary: The Commission presents its report for 2006 on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 concerning the labour cost index (LCI), which establishes a common framework for the production, transmission and evaluation of comparable labour cost indices in the Community. Eurostat publishes a quarterly news release on the labour cost index. Article 13 of the Regulation requires the submission of biennial reports on the implementation of the Regulation. These reports must evaluate in particular the quality of the transmitted LCI series data and the quality of the transmitted back data. Labour costs are generally regarded as an important factor in the analysis of short- and medium-term economic development. The timely production of a labour cost index in the euro area is thus considered by the Commission and the European Central Bank to be of the utmost importance for assessing the inflationary pressure that may arise from short-term developments in the labour market. The labour cost index is also important for the social partners in wage negotiation and for the Commission itself in monitoring short-term developments in labour costs. This report focuses particularly on accuracy , timeliness, comparability , and completeness . General progress since last report: s ince the implementation of reporting in 2004, substantial progress has been achieved, especially in the general availability of the labour cost index. By now, all EU Member States have implemented the LCI and the data are delivered regularly to the Commission although not necessarily within the mandatory deadlines. The availability of the LCI from all EU Member States allows the European Union aggregates to be compiled and makes it possible to compare with sufficient accuracy the development of the hourly labour costs between the Member States. There are, however, a number of quality issues which still require extra effort from certain Member States in order to complete the harmonisation process. Just as the Member States have implemented the necessary facilities for the production of the LCI, the Commission (Eurostat) has also implemented a production system that allows reception, verification, manipulation, storage and dissemination of the Labour Cost Index data in a timely manner. These processes became fully operational in 2005. Quality evaluation: t he following Member States have undertaken all necessary measures to comply fully with the Regulation: Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Spain, Latvia, Lithuania Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovak Republic and the United Kingdom. However, the Netherlands has not delivered the regulatory quality report. The quality evaluation for the Netherlands is therefore still uncertain and a full guarantee on quality cannot be given. Also, even if the quality is evaluated as sufficient for the current part of the LCI series, shortcomings with historical time series still remain in two Member States: Latvia and the UK. Member States with quality shortcomings: a fter inspection, the Commission found that the quality of the LCI is not sufficient in all respects to fulfil the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 for the following Member States: Belgium, Greece, France, Ireland, Italy, Cyprus, Hungary, Malta, Finland and Sweden. The report looks at deficiencies in reporting for each country in turn. These are mainly related to the accuracy element of quality. Definition and coverage of some of the aspects of the LCI do not fully correspond to the legal requirement. Insufficient timeliness, missing working-day and seasonally adjusted series and incomplete historical series also play their part in lowering the quality of the LCI series. Two Member States have not completed the regulatory quality reporting. The Commission (Eurostat) will be monitoring the remaining non-compliance and quality issues regularly through the data delivered and other national documentation. Where desired or planned improvements have not advanced appropriately, the corresponding national authorities will be contacted. Recent actions by the Commission and Member States: i n 2006, the Commission (Eurostat) together with the Member States completed the evaluation of the feasibility studies on extending the scope of the LCI to cover economic activities such as public administration, education and health care (NACE Rev.1 sections L to O) and to develop an index excluding irregular bonuses. The draft Commission Regulation for the extended data collection has been introduced in November 2006. A decision over an index excluding irregular bonuses has not yet been taken as investigations showed that more efforts are still needed in the definitions and especially searching the means making this sub-index operational with acceptable quality. Further issues concerning the relevance and accuracy of the LCI have been given preliminary consideration. As the EU labour cost index series are being used frequently in monitoring labour cost developments for the EU and its Member States, it is of the utmost importance that the national authorities provide data of the highest quality. However, it should be underlined that the situation has improved substantially since the Regulation became fully applicable at the beginning of 2005. All Member States - not only those applying the Regulation fully - have directed resources into implementing actions to achieve more comparable and timely index series. This has clearly raised the overall quality and thus increased the usefulness of the data. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2009-02-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0033/COM_COM(2009)0033_EN.pdf title: COM(2009)0033 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2009&nu_doc=33 title: EUR-Lex summary: This report from the Commission assesses the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 of 27 February 2003 concerning the labour cost index (LCI). It highlights progress made since the last report in 2006. The report recalls that labour costs are an important factor in the analysis of short- and medium-term economic development. The timely production of a labour cost index for the European Union as well as the Euro zone is therefore considered by the Commission and the European Central Bank to be of the utmost importance for assessing the inflationary pressure that may arise from developments in the labour market. Moreover, it notes that the labour cost index is important for the social partners in wage negotiations and for the Commission itself in monitoring short-term developments in labour costs. Overall, the report notes that the degree of compliance with the Regulation has increased since the previous report in 2006. All Member States have continued to channel resources into implementing actions to achieve more comparable and timely index series. This has clearly raised the overall quality and thus increased the usefulness of the data. In the meantime, all missing back data series as well as missing working-day and seasonally adjusted series have been delivered. The timeliness of data delivery has improved, and the number of Member States with accuracy problems has decreased. However, nine Member States still have shortcomings concerning one or more quality aspects of the LCI. For three Member States these shortcomings are due to the incidental late delivery of data only, and therefore of a transitory nature. Six Member States have more serious problems with the accuracy aspect of quality. This compares favourably to the situation in 2006, when 10 Member States reported accuracy problems. The Commission (Eurostat) has urged Member States to step up their improvement efforts. The Commission will be monitoring the remaining non-compliance and quality issues regularly through the data delivered and other national documentation. Where the desired or planned improvements have not advanced appropriately, the corresponding national authorities will be contacted, and the Commission will take the necessary actions to enforce compliance. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2011-03-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0102/COM_COM(2011)0102_EN.pdf title: COM(2011)0102 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=102 title: EUR-Lex summary: The Commission presents a report on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the labour cost index (LCI) Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 creates a common framework for producing and transmitting comparable labour cost indices in the European Union. The Commission (Eurostat) publishes a quarterly news release on the hourly labour cost index. The Regulation provides that the Commission must submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council every two years. The report should look in particular at the quality of the data transmitted. Annual national quality reports are compulsory under the LCI Regulation. The report notes that overall, the degree of compliance with the LCI Regulation has continued to increase since the previous report in 2008. Most Member States comply with its provisions. Member States have continued to channel resources into implementing actions to achieve more comparable and timely index series. This has clearly raised the overall quality and thus increased the usefulness of the data. Since comparability and completeness have improved considerably, the report focuses on accuracy, timeliness and coherence. Accuracy: there are concerns regarding accuracy with various aspects of the LCI. Generally, they are due to shortcomings of the source data and can lead to high volatility of the LCI series. In principle, accuracy problems are discussed by the Member States affected in the yearly quality report, and the Commission (Eurostat) monitors the progress made or planned in the implementation of better sources . At the moment, three Member States are affected by accuracy problems. Germany and Hungary currently do not use source data that would allow them to comply fully with the regulation. LCI data delivered by Greece often show unexplainable growth rates which are difficult to reconcile with the developments in the labour market. Timeliness: this has continued to improve since the last report in 2008. Nevertheless, two Member States (Belgium and Ireland) failed to deliver the data on time. The Commission asked these countries to take the appropriate measures to ensure that the deadlines for the submission of the data are respected in the future. Coherence : in the annual quality report, Member States are asked to compare the growth rates of the LCI with those of hourly compensation of employees in national accounts (ESA95 definition). Both data collections measure the same phenomenon with divergences in the definitions, exhaustiveness of the sources and methodology for calculating the growth rates. Since not all Member States produce quarterly data for hourly compensation of employees (national accounts data), a complete overview of coherence is not possible. Furthermore, as national accounts still use the NACE rev.1 classification while the LCI uses NACE rev.2, the comparison is restricted to a very small number of aggregated NACE sections. The Commission will be monitoring the remaining non-compliance and quality issues regularly through the data delivered and other national documentation. Where the desired or planned improvements are not advancing appropriately, the relevant national authorities will be approached, and the Commission will take the necessary action to enforce compliance. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2013-02-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0069/COM_COM(2013)0069_EN.doc title: COM(2013)0069 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=69 title: EUR-Lex summary: In accordance with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 450/2003, the Commission presents a report on labour cost index (LCI) data from reference quarter 2010Q3 to quarter 2012Q2. The major changes introduced in 2009 relating to the introduction of the new NACE Rev.2 classification and the coverage of non-market services were described in the 2010 report . Since the last report, progress has been made on a number of issues. Generally speaking, the availability and quality of the labour cost index (LCI) continued to improve. The improvements in relevance and completeness are particularly noteworthy. Moreover, the full availability of aggregates (including the NACE Rev. 2 sections O to S) has added to the overall usefulness of the LCI. The publication of yearly estimates of labour-cost levels based on the LCI provides users with significant new added value. However, the report discusses certain matters which should be improved, and highlights the fact that the punctuality of data transmissions from Member States has not improved since the previous report delivered in 2011 , although no country except for Greece was systematically late. The Commission states that Member States should continue channelling resources into measures to achieve punctual data transmissions. Where the desired improvements are not taking place as planned, the relevant national authorities will be approached and the Commission will take the necessary measures to enforce compliance. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2015-02-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0042/COM_COM(2015)0042_EN.pdf title: COM(2015)0042 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2015&nu_doc=0042 title: EUR-Lex summary: The Commission presented a report on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the labour cost index (LCI). Aims of the LCI and amending Regulations : Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 concerning the labour cost index establishes a common framework for the production and provision to the Commission of comparable labour cost indices by Member States. This Regulation has been amended on several occasions: in July 2003: Regulation (EC) No 1216/2003, setting out in greater detail the procedures that Member States must follow when sending their indices to the Commission, the seasonal adjustments to be made to the indices and the content of the national quality reports; in March 2007: Regulation (EC) No 224/2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 1216/2003 and extends the scope of the labour cost index to cover the economic activities of non-market services; in August 2007: Regulation (EC) No 973/2007 which amended a number of regulations on specific statistical domains, including the labour cost index, in order to be able to implement the statistical classification of economic activities set out in NACE Revision 2. Objectives of the report : p ursuant to Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 450/2003, the Commission must submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council every two years. The report should, in particular, examine the quality of the labour cost index data . This report focuses on: the relevance of the data, its accuracy, the punctuality of delivery of data, its accessibility and clarity, its comparability, consistency and completeness. This report will therefore focus on improvements made in relation to relevance and coverage, and will address the issues of the consistency of the data with national accounts data and the comparability of working-day adjusted data. Particular attention is given to the problem of data not being provided by Member States within the deadlines set, and the consequences of this for the quality of the published European aggregates. In general, the availability and quality of the labour cost index has continued to improve . Seasonally adjusted data are now available from all Member States except Ireland and Croatia. National quality reports for the reference year 2013 were provided by all Member States except Greece and Croatia, and have been made available to the public. Consistency of data : on e of the areas that continues to receive attention is the consistency of the labour cost index with other statistics on labour costs, in particular the quarterly national accounts data. This has been analysed from both a theoretical and an empirical point of view and the results have been discussed with Member States. Moreover, the Commission (Eurostat) will organise a workshop with Member States in 2015 at which they will assess and try to further improve the overall quality of statistics on labour costs. The Commission (Eurostat) has also improved the availability of estimates of hourly labour costs by publishing averages for a one-year period that are largely based on the labour cost index and can be produced soon after the end of the reference period. As a result, national annual labour cost statistics, which used to be collected under a gentlemen’s agreement, are no longer being provided by Member States for publication by the Commission. Other main conclusions : overall, the quality of the labour cost index has continued to improve since the previous report (see the summary dated 12.02.2013). The improvements in Member States’ punctuality in delivering data and in the completeness of the data are particularly noteworthy. Moreover, the full availability of aggregates has added to the overall usefulness of the labour cost index. User needs are being better met thanks to the publication of yearly estimates of labour costs based on labour cost index data. Delivery of data by Member States is close to satisfactory . With the exception of Greece, no country was systematically late in providing data to the Commission. In recent years, the Commission (Eurostat) has regularly urged Member States to make greater efforts to conform to requirements in this area. The Commission will continue to monitor as-yet-unresolved issues relating to non-compliance and data quality on a regular basis, using the data delivered and other national documentation, including quality reports. Where no or insufficient improvement is seen, the relevant national authorities will be approached and the Commission will take the necessary measures to enforce compliance. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2017-02-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2017/0071/COM_COM(2017)0071_EN.pdf title: COM(2017)0071 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2017&nu_doc=0071 title: EUR-Lex summary: In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 on the labour cost index (LCI), the Commission presented a report on the quality of the labour cost index data for the reference quarters ranging from third quarter 2014 to second quarter 2016. The report focused on improvements in relevance, completeness, punctuality, accuracy and comparability , and examines the consistency between the labour cost index and the national accounts. It also deals with the problem of data not being supplied by the Member States within the set deadlines, as well as the impact of this situation on the quality of published European aggregates. General progress : the main findings of the report were as follows: · the use of the Statistical Data and Metadata eXchange (SDMX) standard (worldwide reference for sharing statistical information) for nomenclatures and variables used in the labour cost index data has been extended to all Member States . The latest SDMX improvements are in the process of being implemented and deployment of the new version is expected to take place in the next reference quarter; · the quality reports submitted by the Member States have been migrated to a new version of the metadata manager of the European Statistical System Metadata Handler and made available to all users; · the overall quality of statistics on the labour cost index and some technical aspects were evaluated in a workshop on this topic organised by Eurostat and proposals for improvements were agreed. At the October 2016 working group meeting on labor market statistics, countries not using the indirect method for seasonal adjustment (wages/non-wages and NACE aggregates) and whose data presented sizeable inconsistencies between components and total, agreed to implement the indirect method by mid-2017. The consistency of labour cost index data is expected to improve further. Eurostat has also started publishing annual estimates of the hourly labour cost levels by NACE sections, starting from 2012 onwards, based on both labour cost survey levels and labour cost index trends. The Commission received positive comments on the publication of these estimates. Data quality assessment : the report found that overall the quality of the labour cost indices of the Member States and of the EU has continued to improve since the previous report, published in 2014. Eurostat received working-day adjusted data and seasonally and working-day adjusted data from all Member States. Member States’ punctuality remained good except for Greece whose labour cost index data were still behind the established deadlines. Eurostat held a bilateral meeting with the Greek statistical office in May 2016, during which a roadmap for tackling these structural issues was agreed. The Commission will continue to monitor issues relating to non-compliance and data quality on a regular basis. Where no or insufficient improvement is seen, the Commission will closely follow-up with the competent national statistical authorities. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2019-02-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2019/0113/COM_COM(2019)0113_EN.pdf title: COM(2019)0113 summary: The Commission presents a report on Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the labour cost index (LCI), which establishes a common framework for Member States to produce comparable LCIs and provide them to the Commission. The report examines the LCI data provided to the Commission for the reference quarters from the third quarter of 2016 (2016-Q3) to the first quarter of 2018 (2018-Q1). The LCI measures quarterly changes in total hourly labour costs borne by employers, making it possible to monitor developments in the cost pressure arising from the production factor ‘labour’. The Commission focuses on the following criteria for assessing the quality of the LCI: relevance, completeness, punctuality, accuracy, comparability and coherence. General progress since the last report The report states that overall, the quality of the Member States’ LCIs and the EU aggregates has continued to improve since the previous report in 2017 – in particular as regards the punctuality of Member States’ transmissions, which is now almost completely satisfactory. A new version of the Statistical Data and Metadata eXchange (SDMX) data structures makes it possible to collect new optional variables, such as quarterly labour costs and quarterly number of hours worked. The same SDMX data structures have been implemented to transmit LCI data to the European Central Bank (ECB). Thanks to SDMX standardisation, a new automatic validation tool (STRUVAL) has been implemented that notifies Member States of any IT issue detected in their LCI transmissions. Furthermore, the programmes used to validate, aggregate and disseminate LCI data have been entirely re-engineered, making it possible to: (i) improve the reliability of the production chain; (ii) ensure consistency between totals and components by design; and (iii) produce new indicators such as annual growth rates and the size of the non-wage component. Quality of data Relevance: in 2017, the Commission (Eurostat) started to publish annual estimates of hourly labour costs by NACE Rev. 2 section, on the basis of labour cost survey levels and LCI trends. In addition, it has started disseminating the annual growth rate of hourly labour cost levels and the proportion of total labour costs made up of non-wage costs. The Commission has received positive feedback on the publication of these estimates and will continue to produce the annual labour costs with a NACE Rev. 2 breakdown. Completeness: in general, the availability and quality of the LCI has continued to improve. Eurostat received calendar-adjusted data and calendar- and seasonally adjusted data from all Member States. All except Denmark and Sweden (which were granted derogations) also delivered non-seasonally adjusted data. Despite the improved coverage of seasonally adjusted data, it was decided, to keep calendar-adjusted data as headline figures. Punctuality: Member States’ punctuality in sending data to the Commission has improved since the previous report as data were transmitted on time by Greece while the transmissions of Croatia recorded a delay of 1 day maximum, over the whole reference period. Accuracy: revisions of the EU headline figure (year-on-year growth rate) have exceeded 0.2 percentage points (pp) twice (upwards in both cases) since the first quarter of 2016. This was caused by major revisions being recorded in the United Kingdom during the transmission of March 2018. Only two other countries (Germany and the Netherlands) recorded noticeable revisions. Comparability: using the new IT programmes, Eurostat’s policy is systematically to detect inconsistencies of 0.1 pp or more between totals and components, and to report them to the country concerned in a validation report. The total LCI is then recalculated on the basis of the wage and non-wage components (indirect approach). Indices are thus calculated using a harmonised approach for all Member States, so as to ensure greater comparability. Coherence with national accounts figures: one of the areas that continue to receive attention is the coherence of the LCI with other statistics on labour costs, in particular the quarterly national accounts data. Eurostat carried out a quality exercise for NACE Rev. 2 sections B to S aggregates for each Member State, using non-seasonally adjusted LCI data, except for Denmark and Sweden, for which calendar-adjusted data were available. The median annual growth rate of the LCI was compared with that of the hourly compensation of employees over 10 quarters. Variations of more than 1 pp were considered to warrant further analysis. This was the case for Croatia (5.1 pp), Greece (2.2 pp), Romania (2.1 pp), Ireland (1.4 pp), Malta (1.2 pp) and Slovenia (1.1 pp). The results of the analysis will be followed up with those Member States, in particular with respect to data on hours worked. The Commission will continue to monitor compliance and data quality on a regular basis, using the data delivered and other national documentation, including quality reports. type: Follow-up document body: EC
events
  • date: 2001-07-23T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2001&nu_doc=418 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2001)0418 summary:
  • date: 2001-09-03T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2001-12-19T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 2001-12-19T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-461&language=EN title: A5-0461/2001
  • date: 2002-02-27T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20020227&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2002-02-28T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-78 title: T5-0078/2002 summary:
  • date: 2002-09-23T00:00:00 type: Council position published body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=10803%2F02&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 10803/2/2002 summary:
  • date: 2002-10-11T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP
  • date: 2002-11-28T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 2002-11-28T00:00:00 type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-420&language=EN title: A5-0420/2002
  • date: 2002-12-18T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-615 title: T5-0615/2002 summary:
  • date: 2003-02-27T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL
  • date: 2003-02-27T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2003-03-13T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to establish a common framework for the establishment of labour cost indices. COMMUNITY MEASURE: Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the labour cost index. CONTENT: this Regulation follows on from the fact that a range of statistics, of which labour cost indices form an essential part, is required for an understanding of the inflationary process and the dynamics of the labour market. Furthermore, the Action Plan on Economic and Monetary Union statistical requirements, produced by the European Commission (Eurostat) in collaboration with the European Central Bank, identifies as a priority the development of a legal basis covering short-term labour cost statistics. The objective of this Regulation is to establish a common framework for the production, transmission and evaluation of comparable labour cost indices in the Community. Member States must produce labour cost indices for the economic activities defined in the Regulation. The provisions include a definition of the labour cost index (LCI.) The labour costs are the total quarterly costs incurred by the employer in the employment of labour. The labour cost items and total staff employed are defined by reference to Regulation 530/1999 and its implementing legislation. The hours worked are defined by reference to Regulation 2223/96. The main provisions of this Regulation are as follows: - this Regulation applies to all activities defined in sections C to O of NACE Rev.1. The inclusion of economic activities defined by NACE Rev.1 sections L, M, N and O in the scope of the Regulation are to be determined in accordance with the procedure and the feasibility studies defined in the Regulation. The LCI will represent all statistical units as defined in Council Regulation 696/93. - the Regulation makes provision for the breakdown of variables. LCI must be provided separately for the three labour cost categories identified below: a) total labour costs; b) wages and salaries, defined by reference to Regulation 1726/1999; c) employers' social contributions plus taxes paid by the employer less subsidies received by the employer; - an index estimating total labour costs, excluding bonuses, and based on the NACE Rev.1 classification, must be provided, taking into account the feasibility studies defined in the Regulation. - the data for the LCI will first be compiled for the first quarter of 2003, and thereafter for each quarter (ending on 31 March, 30 June, 30 September and 31 December of each year). - Member States must provide back data covering the period from the first quarter of 1996 to the fourth quarter of 2002. The back data will be provided for each of the NACE Rev.1 sections C to K and for the labour cost items mentioned. This must be sent to Eurostat at the same time as the LCI for the first quarter of 2003. - Member States must transmit the data required to Eurostat within 70 days of the end of the reference period. - Transition periods may be granted under the specified procedure for not more than two years from the date of entry into force of the Regulation. - The Commission will institute a series of feasibility studies, to be undertaken by the Member States, in particular by those that cannot provide the data for NACE Rev. 1 sections L, M, N, and O or the breakdown of the index estimating total labour costs, excluding bonuses. - the Commission will be assisted by the Statistical Programme Committee instituted by Article 1 of Decision 89/382/EEC, Euratom. The Commission must submit a report on the implementation of the Regulation to the European Parliament and the Council every two years. This report must evaluate in particular the quality of the transmitted LCI series data and the quality of the transmitted back data. The first report will be submitted no later than 31 December of the year following the entry into force of this Regulation. It will refer only to the actions executed by Member States to prepare the application of this Regulation. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 27/02/2003. docs: title: Regulation 2003/450 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32003R0450 title: OJ L 069 13.03.2003, p. 0001-0005 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2003:069:TOC
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home title: Eurostat
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ECON/5/16039
New
  • ECON/5/16039
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32003R0450
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32003R0450
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.15.04 Workforce, occupational mobility, job conversion, working conditions
  • 5.10.01 Convergence of economic policies, public deficit, interest rates
  • 8.60 European statistical legislation
New
4.15.04
Workforce, occupational mobility, job conversion, working conditions
5.10.01
Convergence of economic policies, public deficit, interest rates
8.60
European statistical legislation
activities/11/text/0
Old
PURPOSE : to establish a common framework for the establishment of labour cost indices. COMMUNITY MEASURE : Regulation 450/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the labour cost index. CONTENT : this Regulation follows on from the fact that a range of statistics, of which labour cost indices form an essential part, is required for an understanding of the inflationary process and the dynamics of the labour market. Furthermore, the Action Plan on Economic and Monetary Union statistical requirements, produced by the European Commission (Eurostat) in collaboration with the European Central Bank, identifies as a priority the development of a legal basis covering short-term labour cost statistics. The objective of this Regulation is to establish a common framework for the production, transmission and evaluation of comparable labour cost indices in the Community. Member States must produce labour cost indices for the economic activities defined in the Regulation. The provisions include a definition of the labour cost index (LCI.) The labour costs are the total quarterly costs incurred by the employer in the employment of labour. The labour cost items and total staff employed are defined by reference to Regulation 530/1999 and its implementing legislation. The hours worked are defined by reference to Regulation 2223/96. The main provisions of this Regulation are as follows: - this Regulation applies to all activities defined in sections C to O of NACE Rev.1. The inclusion of economic activities defined by NACE Rev.1 sections L, M, N and O in the scope of the Regulation are to be determined in accordance with the procedure and the feasibility studies defined in the Regulation. The LCI will represent all statistical units as defined in Council Regulation 696/93. - the Regulation makes provision for the breakdown of variables. LCI must be provided separately for the three labour cost categories identified below: a) total labour costs; b) wages and salaries, defined by reference to Regulation 1726/1999; c) employers' social contributions plus taxes paid by the employer less subsidies received by the employer; - an index estimating total labour costs, excluding bonuses, and based on the NACE Rev.1 classification, must be provided, taking into account the feasibility studies defined in the Regulation. - the data for the LCI will first be compiled for the first quarter of 2003, and thereafter for each quarter (ending on 31 March, 30 June, 30 September and 31 December of each year). - Member States must provide back data covering the period from the first quarter of 1996 to the fourth quarter of 2002. The back data will be provided for each of the NACE Rev.1 sections C to K and for the labour cost items mentioned. This must be sent to Eurostat at the same time as the LCI for the first quarter of 2003. - Member States must transmit the data required to Eurostat within 70 days of the end of the reference period. - Transition periods may be granted under the specified procedure for not more than two years from the date of entry into force of the Regulation. - The Commission will institute a series of feasibility studies, to be undertaken by the Member States, in particular by those that cannot provide the data for NACE Rev. 1 sections L, M, N, and O or the breakdown of the index estimating total labour costs, excluding bonuses. - the Commission will be assisted by the Statistical Programme Committee instituted by Article 1 of Decision 89/382/EEC, Euratom. The Commission must submit a report on the implementation of the Regulation to the European Parliament and the Council every two years. This report must evaluate in particular the quality of the transmitted LCI series data and the quality of the transmitted back data. The first report will be submitted no later than 31 December of the year following the entry into force of this Regulation. It will refer only to the actions executed by Member States to prepare the application of this Regulation. ENTRY INTO FORCE : 27/02/03.�
New

PURPOSE: to establish a common framework for the establishment of labour cost indices.

COMMUNITY MEASURE: Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the labour cost index.

CONTENT: this Regulation follows on from the fact that a range of statistics, of which labour cost indices form an essential part, is required for an understanding of the inflationary process and the dynamics of the labour market. Furthermore, the Action Plan on Economic and Monetary Union statistical requirements, produced by the European Commission (Eurostat) in collaboration with the European Central Bank, identifies as a priority the development of a legal basis covering short-term labour cost statistics.

The objective of this Regulation is to establish a common framework for the production, transmission and evaluation of comparable labour cost indices in the Community. Member States must produce labour cost indices for the economic activities defined in the Regulation. The provisions include a definition of the labour cost index (LCI.) The labour costs are the total quarterly costs incurred by the employer in the employment of labour. The labour cost items and total staff employed are defined by reference to Regulation 530/1999 and its implementing legislation. The hours worked are defined by reference to Regulation 2223/96.

The main provisions of this Regulation are as follows: 

- this Regulation applies to all activities defined in sections C to O of NACE Rev.1. The inclusion of economic activities defined by NACE Rev.1 sections L, M, N and O in the scope of the Regulation are to be determined in accordance with the procedure and the feasibility studies defined in the Regulation. The LCI will represent all statistical units as defined in Council Regulation 696/93.

- the Regulation makes provision for the breakdown of variables. LCI must be provided separately for the three labour cost categories identified below:

a) total labour costs;
b) wages and salaries, defined by reference to Regulation 1726/1999;
c) employers' social contributions plus taxes paid by the employer less subsidies received by the employer;

- an index estimating total labour costs, excluding bonuses, and based on the NACE Rev.1 classification, must be provided, taking into account the feasibility studies defined in the Regulation.

- the data for the LCI will first be compiled for the first quarter of 2003, and thereafter for each quarter (ending on 31 March, 30 June, 30 September and 31 December of each year).

- Member States must provide back data covering the period from the first quarter of 1996 to the fourth quarter of 2002. The back data will be provided for each of the NACE Rev.1 sections C to K and for the labour cost items mentioned. This must be sent to Eurostat at the same time as the LCI for the first quarter of 2003.

- Member States must transmit the data required to Eurostat within 70 days of the end of the reference period.

- Transition periods may be granted under the specified procedure for not more than two years from the date of entry into force of the Regulation.

- The Commission will institute a series of feasibility studies, to be undertaken by the Member States, in particular by those that cannot provide the data for NACE Rev. 1 sections L, M, N, and O or the breakdown of the index estimating total labour costs, excluding bonuses.

- the Commission will be assisted by the Statistical Programme Committee instituted by Article 1 of Decision 89/382/EEC, Euratom.

The Commission must submit a report on the implementation of the Regulation to the European Parliament and the Council every two years. This report must evaluate in particular the quality of the transmitted LCI series data and the quality of the transmitted back data. The first report will be submitted no later than 31 December of the year following the entry into force of this Regulation. It will refer only to the actions executed by Member States to prepare the application of this Regulation.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 27/02/2003.

links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
procedure/title
Old
Labour market, statistics: labour cost index
New
Labour market statistics: labour cost index
activities
  • date: 2001-07-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2001&nu_doc=418 celexid: CELEX:52001PC0418:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2001)0418 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home title: Eurostat
  • date: 2001-09-03T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2001-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: V/ALE name: MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2001-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: V/ALE name: MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-461&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A5-0461/2001 date: 2001-12-19T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2002-02-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20020227&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2002-02-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-78 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0078/2002 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2448 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=10803%2F02&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Council position published title: 10803/2/2002 council: Agriculture and Fisheries date: 2002-09-23T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2002-10-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2001-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: V/ALE name: MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2001-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: V/ALE name: MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-420&language=EN type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading title: A5-0420/2002 date: 2002-11-28T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading
  • date: 2002-12-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-615 type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading title: T5-0615/2002 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
  • date: 2003-02-27T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2003-02-27T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2003-03-13T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32003R0450 title: Regulation 2003/450 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2003:069:TOC title: OJ L 069 13.03.2003, p. 0001-0005
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2001-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: V/ALE name: MAYOL I RAYNAL Miquel
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI
links
European Commission
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home title: Eurostat
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ECON/5/16039
reference
2001/0166(COD)
instrument
Regulation
legal_basis
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 285
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Legislation
title
Labour market, statistics: labour cost index
type
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
final
subject