BETA


2002/0171(CNS) European Training Foundation: budget and finances, access to documents (amend. Regulation (EEC) No 1360/90)

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead BUDG DELL'ALBA Gianfranco (icon: NA NA)
Committee Opinion CONT VAN HULTEN Michiel (icon: PES PES)
Committee Opinion LIBE HERNÁNDEZ MOLLAR Jorge Salvador (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion AFCO
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 308

Events

2006/12/19
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

This report is presented under Article 17 of the Council Regulation establishing the European Training Foundation (“the ETF”), and aims to provide an overview of experience acquired in the work of the ETF for the period 2002-2005. It takes into account changes in the geographical coverage, operating environment and role of the ETF since 2000, and draws on the findings and recommendations of the independent evaluator's report provided by ITAD, the external contractor. The report also takes into consideration the evolution of EU policy towards third countries, and expected changes in EU policy instruments after 2006. The current external assistance programmes (Phare, Tacis, Meda and Cards), which define the scope of the ETF’s activities, will be replaced in 2007 by three new external assistance instruments, the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI), the Instrument for Pre–accession Assistance (IPA) and the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI). These changes require an adaptation of the ETF’s founding regulation. The findings from the external evaluation process will inform the proposed amendment of the Council Regulation on the ETF. It is recalled that the Agency's overall objective is to contribute to the development of vocational training systems in the four regions within its remit: the Caucuses and Central Asia, the acceding and candidate countries, the potential candidate countries, and the southern and eastern Mediterranean. Beneficiary countries are known as "partner countries".

Current priorities and activities: o n an operational level, the ETF uses three main instruments: support to EC programmes and dissemination of EU policies; capacity building, information and analysis for the partner countries; innovation, learning and development, including pilot projects which analyse lessons learned during the application of reform strategies by partner countries.

Main recommendations of the external evaluation:

- the report argued for some increased flexibility in the ETF’s geographical remit . This would allow ETF’s particular expertise to be used by the Community in countries at comparable stages of development and facing similar socio-economic challenges. The Commission shares to a large extent the analysis and recommendations of the evaluators, in particular on the thematic remit of the agency. The growing importance of the lifelong learning approach to education and training in the policies and instruments of the EU calls for a wider thematic remit of the ETF. The Commission proposes to address this issue in the upcoming revision of the ETF Regulation by broadening its mandate;

- the Commission considers that the ETF, which has limited resources, should maintain its geographical focus. It is therefore proposed that the ETF’s primary scope be defined by reference to the IPA and to the ENPI. In order to ensure the possibility of using the ETF’s expertise in areas falling outside its primary geographical scope, such as the Central Asian countries, it is proposed that a relevant ad hoc decision be taken by the ETF Governing Board on proposal from the Commission;

- a key issue arising from the report is to ensure a close link between ETF pilot actions and larger scale EC funded actions, or actions which could be funded by other donors;

- the evaluation report paid attention to the need to raise the ETF's capacity to monitor its activities at project and country level. In this respect, the report recognised that the monitoring of ETF achievements at country level is a complex area. The ETF’s work is more about facilitating the flow of information rather than about producing products or outputs. The main challenge for the ETF is to monitor not simply the production of a particular document, but to measure the impact produced on national plans and reform actions. The evaluation concluded that the ETF’s current monitoring system, which is designed to track performance at the level of activities and individual projects, did not adequately measure the quality of the ETF's services/products or the ETF's impact on VET reform at country level. The Commission asks the ETF to develop a relevant monitoring system;

- with regard to governance structures, the evaluators note particularly that, although the Governing Board does fulfil its primary role, there are questions regarding its effective role in strategic decision making. On the Advisory Forum, the report felt that the latter falls short of its purpose of providing advice to the Governing Body on the future Work Programme;

- the communication and dissemination system had greatly improved since the last evaluation. The report showed that ETF’s communications initiatives, and in particular its website, workshops and exchange visits, newsletter printed publications (80%) were very effective.

Conclusion: t he Commission shares the evaluator's overall positive assessment of the efficiency and effectiveness of the ETF's work and considers that the Agency has made a valuable contribution to the Community's activities in the field of vocational education and training and labour market reform in the partner regions. The ETF has to look at its planning cycle. In particular, it is asked to analyse how the links between ‘the mid-term priorities – the annual work programme – the country plans – the annual activity report’ can be reinforced and be made more explicit. Relevant measurable indicators should be defined in order to facilitate the follow-up of the set objectives and goals and to ease the assessment of the ETF's impact in its areas of intervention. New approaches should be explored to improve the development and appropriate dissemination of relevant VET material, and to strengthen the ETF’s capacity to communicate its achievements and results.

The introduction of the new external aid instruments, the IPA and the ENPI, marks a significant step towards a policy-driven rather than programme-driven approach to external assistance in a sector-wide perspective. Both instruments are designed to provide support towards the achievement by partner countries of home-grown reforms in the sectors concerned. The objectives are defined by a process of dialogue with partner country governments and support is provided to them for the implementation of reform processes designed and managed by them.

In this new context, the ETF will increasingly be required to provide the Commission with information and analysis at the policy development and programming phase. The other focus of attention has to be in helping partner countries to build the capacity to define and implement indigenous reform strategies, and in promoting networking and exchange of experience and good practice between the EU and the partner countries and among partner countries themselves.

The ETF should adapt its organisation and its way of working to this new environment. The agency must in coordination with the Governing Board and the Commission establish clear priorities and concentrate its available resources on its core activities.

For both the Commission and the ETF, increased awareness and monitoring of the type of services both offered and needed will be required in order to ensure that the activities of the Agency continue to be useful and relevant. This implies that the Commission should keep the ETF fully informed on new or revised priorities or strategies. Similarly, the ETF should keep Commission services, in the field and at headquarters, fully informed of its operations, initiatives and contacts with relevant stakeholders in partner countries, other international donors and agencies in order to ensure coherence and visibility of EC action. This demands a renewed commitment from both sides to strong communication and exchange.

The ETF's management must continue its effort to establish a clear vision within the Agency of its position and role as a European centre of expertise in the new institutional landscape. Overall, the Commission believes that the external evaluation report provides useful lessons and recommendations for the development of the ETF as a centre of expertise. The Commission invites the ETF to submit a draft Action Plan to the Governing Board, outlining its analysis and proposed actions on all recommendations made by the evaluator and by the Commission in this report.

The Commission proposal for a revised regulation of ETF will also provide the opportunity for discussion and exchange with the European Parliament and the Council on the future role of the ETF, its objectives and priorities, and its governance structure.

2003/09/29
   Final act published in Official Journal
2003/06/18
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
2003/06/18
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2003/06/18
   CSL - Council Meeting
2003/03/27
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2003/03/27
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2002/10/22
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, partial vote at 1st reading/single reading
2002/10/22
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2002/10/07
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2002/10/02
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2002/10/02
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2002/10/02
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2002/10/01
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2002/09/30
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2002/09/23
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2002/09/12
   EP - HERNÁNDEZ MOLLAR Jorge Salvador (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2002/09/02
   EP - VAN HULTEN Michiel (PES) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2002/08/28
   EP - DELL'ALBA Gianfranco (NA) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2002/07/17
   EC - Legislative proposal published

Documents

  • Follow-up document: COM(2006)0832
  • Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
  • Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2003/1648
  • Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 245 29.09.2003, p. 0022-0024
  • Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T5-0111/2003
  • Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: OJ C 062 11.03.2004, p. 0018-0134 E
  • Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T5-0111/2003
  • Text adopted by Parliament, partial vote at 1st reading/single reading: T5-0480/2002
  • Text adopted by Parliament, partial vote at 1st reading/single reading: OJ C 300 11.12.2003, p. 0022-0093 E
  • Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T5-0480/2002
  • Committee opinion: PE319.235/DEF
  • Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A5-0336/2002
  • Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A5-0336/2002
  • Committee opinion: PE315.796/DEF
  • Committee draft report: PE318.749
  • Legislative proposal published: COM(2002)0406
  • Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
  • Committee draft report: PE318.749
  • Committee opinion: PE315.796/DEF
  • Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A5-0336/2002
  • Committee opinion: PE319.235/DEF
  • Text adopted by Parliament, partial vote at 1st reading/single reading: T5-0480/2002 OJ C 300 11.12.2003, p. 0022-0093 E
  • Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T5-0111/2003 OJ C 062 11.03.2004, p. 0018-0134 E
  • Follow-up document: COM(2006)0832 EUR-Lex

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: DELL'ALBA Gianfranco date: 2002-08-28T00:00:00 group: Non-attached Members abbr: NA
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2002-08-28T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DELL'ALBA Gianfranco group: Non-attached Members abbr: NA
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: VAN HULTEN Michiel date: 2002-09-02T00:00:00 group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2002-09-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VAN HULTEN Michiel group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: HERNÁNDEZ MOLLAR Jorge Salvador date: 2002-09-12T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2002-09-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HERNÁNDEZ MOLLAR Jorge Salvador group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-336&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0336_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-480
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0480_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2003-111
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2003-0111_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0832/COM_COM(2006)0832_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0832/COM_COM(2006)0832_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2002/0406/COM_COM(2002)0406_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2002/0406/COM_COM(2002)0406_EN.pdf
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-336&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2002-0336_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-480
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2002-0480_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2003-111
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2003-0111_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2002-07-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2002/0406/COM_COM(2002)0406_EN.pdf title: COM(2002)0406 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52002PC0406(02):EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2002-09-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2002-08-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: NI name: DELL'ALBA Gianfranco body: EP responsible: False committee: CONT date: 2002-09-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PSE name: VAN HULTEN Michiel body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2002-09-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HERNÁNDEZ MOLLAR Jorge Salvador
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2002-08-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: NI name: DELL'ALBA Gianfranco body: EP responsible: False committee: CONT date: 2002-09-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PSE name: VAN HULTEN Michiel body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2002-09-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HERNÁNDEZ MOLLAR Jorge Salvador docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-336&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A5-0336/2002 date: 2002-10-02T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2002-10-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-480 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0480/2002 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2003-03-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2003-111 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0111/2003 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2003-06-18T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 2516
  • date: 2003-06-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2003-06-18T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2003-09-29T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32003R1648 title: Regulation 2003/1648 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:245:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ L 245 29.09.2003, p. 0022-0024
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2002-08-28T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DELL'ALBA Gianfranco group: Non-attached Members abbr: NA
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2002-09-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VAN HULTEN Michiel group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
BUDG
date
2002-08-28T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: NI name: DELL'ALBA Gianfranco
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2002-09-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HERNÁNDEZ MOLLAR Jorge Salvador group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
CONT
date
2002-09-02T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: PSE name: VAN HULTEN Michiel
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
LIBE
date
2002-09-12T00:00:00
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: HERNÁNDEZ MOLLAR Jorge Salvador
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 2516 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2516*&MEET_DATE=18/06/2003 date: 2003-06-18T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2002-09-30T00:00:00 docs: title: PE318.749 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2002-10-01T00:00:00 docs: title: PE315.796/DEF committee: CONT type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2002-10-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-336&language=EN title: A5-0336/2002 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2002-10-07T00:00:00 docs: title: PE319.235/DEF committee: LIBE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2002-10-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-480 title: T5-0480/2002 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2003:300E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 300 11.12.2003, p. 0022-0093 E summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, partial vote at 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2003-03-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2003-111 title: T5-0111/2003 title: OJ C 062 11.03.2004, p. 0018-0134 E summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0832/COM_COM(2006)0832_EN.pdf title: COM(2006)0832 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=832 title: EUR-Lex summary: This report is presented under Article 17 of the Council Regulation establishing the European Training Foundation (“the ETF”), and aims to provide an overview of experience acquired in the work of the ETF for the period 2002-2005. It takes into account changes in the geographical coverage, operating environment and role of the ETF since 2000, and draws on the findings and recommendations of the independent evaluator's report provided by ITAD, the external contractor. The report also takes into consideration the evolution of EU policy towards third countries, and expected changes in EU policy instruments after 2006. The current external assistance programmes (Phare, Tacis, Meda and Cards), which define the scope of the ETF’s activities, will be replaced in 2007 by three new external assistance instruments, the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI), the Instrument for Pre–accession Assistance (IPA) and the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI). These changes require an adaptation of the ETF’s founding regulation. The findings from the external evaluation process will inform the proposed amendment of the Council Regulation on the ETF. It is recalled that the Agency's overall objective is to contribute to the development of vocational training systems in the four regions within its remit: the Caucuses and Central Asia, the acceding and candidate countries, the potential candidate countries, and the southern and eastern Mediterranean. Beneficiary countries are known as "partner countries". Current priorities and activities: o n an operational level, the ETF uses three main instruments: support to EC programmes and dissemination of EU policies; capacity building, information and analysis for the partner countries; innovation, learning and development, including pilot projects which analyse lessons learned during the application of reform strategies by partner countries. Main recommendations of the external evaluation: - the report argued for some increased flexibility in the ETF’s geographical remit . This would allow ETF’s particular expertise to be used by the Community in countries at comparable stages of development and facing similar socio-economic challenges. The Commission shares to a large extent the analysis and recommendations of the evaluators, in particular on the thematic remit of the agency. The growing importance of the lifelong learning approach to education and training in the policies and instruments of the EU calls for a wider thematic remit of the ETF. The Commission proposes to address this issue in the upcoming revision of the ETF Regulation by broadening its mandate; - the Commission considers that the ETF, which has limited resources, should maintain its geographical focus. It is therefore proposed that the ETF’s primary scope be defined by reference to the IPA and to the ENPI. In order to ensure the possibility of using the ETF’s expertise in areas falling outside its primary geographical scope, such as the Central Asian countries, it is proposed that a relevant ad hoc decision be taken by the ETF Governing Board on proposal from the Commission; - a key issue arising from the report is to ensure a close link between ETF pilot actions and larger scale EC funded actions, or actions which could be funded by other donors; - the evaluation report paid attention to the need to raise the ETF's capacity to monitor its activities at project and country level. In this respect, the report recognised that the monitoring of ETF achievements at country level is a complex area. The ETF’s work is more about facilitating the flow of information rather than about producing products or outputs. The main challenge for the ETF is to monitor not simply the production of a particular document, but to measure the impact produced on national plans and reform actions. The evaluation concluded that the ETF’s current monitoring system, which is designed to track performance at the level of activities and individual projects, did not adequately measure the quality of the ETF's services/products or the ETF's impact on VET reform at country level. The Commission asks the ETF to develop a relevant monitoring system; - with regard to governance structures, the evaluators note particularly that, although the Governing Board does fulfil its primary role, there are questions regarding its effective role in strategic decision making. On the Advisory Forum, the report felt that the latter falls short of its purpose of providing advice to the Governing Body on the future Work Programme; - the communication and dissemination system had greatly improved since the last evaluation. The report showed that ETF’s communications initiatives, and in particular its website, workshops and exchange visits, newsletter printed publications (80%) were very effective. Conclusion: t he Commission shares the evaluator's overall positive assessment of the efficiency and effectiveness of the ETF's work and considers that the Agency has made a valuable contribution to the Community's activities in the field of vocational education and training and labour market reform in the partner regions. The ETF has to look at its planning cycle. In particular, it is asked to analyse how the links between ‘the mid-term priorities – the annual work programme – the country plans – the annual activity report’ can be reinforced and be made more explicit. Relevant measurable indicators should be defined in order to facilitate the follow-up of the set objectives and goals and to ease the assessment of the ETF's impact in its areas of intervention. New approaches should be explored to improve the development and appropriate dissemination of relevant VET material, and to strengthen the ETF’s capacity to communicate its achievements and results. The introduction of the new external aid instruments, the IPA and the ENPI, marks a significant step towards a policy-driven rather than programme-driven approach to external assistance in a sector-wide perspective. Both instruments are designed to provide support towards the achievement by partner countries of home-grown reforms in the sectors concerned. The objectives are defined by a process of dialogue with partner country governments and support is provided to them for the implementation of reform processes designed and managed by them. In this new context, the ETF will increasingly be required to provide the Commission with information and analysis at the policy development and programming phase. The other focus of attention has to be in helping partner countries to build the capacity to define and implement indigenous reform strategies, and in promoting networking and exchange of experience and good practice between the EU and the partner countries and among partner countries themselves. The ETF should adapt its organisation and its way of working to this new environment. The agency must in coordination with the Governing Board and the Commission establish clear priorities and concentrate its available resources on its core activities. For both the Commission and the ETF, increased awareness and monitoring of the type of services both offered and needed will be required in order to ensure that the activities of the Agency continue to be useful and relevant. This implies that the Commission should keep the ETF fully informed on new or revised priorities or strategies. Similarly, the ETF should keep Commission services, in the field and at headquarters, fully informed of its operations, initiatives and contacts with relevant stakeholders in partner countries, other international donors and agencies in order to ensure coherence and visibility of EC action. This demands a renewed commitment from both sides to strong communication and exchange. The ETF's management must continue its effort to establish a clear vision within the Agency of its position and role as a European centre of expertise in the new institutional landscape. Overall, the Commission believes that the external evaluation report provides useful lessons and recommendations for the development of the ETF as a centre of expertise. The Commission invites the ETF to submit a draft Action Plan to the Governing Board, outlining its analysis and proposed actions on all recommendations made by the evaluator and by the Commission in this report. The Commission proposal for a revised regulation of ETF will also provide the opportunity for discussion and exchange with the European Parliament and the Council on the future role of the ETF, its objectives and priorities, and its governance structure. type: Follow-up document body: EC
events
  • date: 2002-07-17T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2002/0406/COM_COM(2002)0406_EN.pdf title: COM(2002)0406 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2002&nu_doc=406 title: EUR-Lex summary:
  • date: 2002-09-23T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2002-10-02T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 2002-10-02T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-336&language=EN title: A5-0336/2002
  • date: 2002-10-22T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-480 title: T5-0480/2002 summary:
  • date: 2003-03-27T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2003-111 title: T5-0111/2003 summary:
  • date: 2003-06-18T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2003-06-18T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2003-09-29T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: title: Regulation 2003/1648 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32003R1648 title: OJ L 245 29.09.2003, p. 0022-0024 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:245:SOM:EN:HTML
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32003R1648
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32003R1648
procedure/instrument
Old
Regulation
New
  • Regulation
  • Repealed by 2007/0163(COD)
procedure/subject
Old
  • 1.20.05 Public access to information and documents, administrative practice
  • 8.40.08 Agencies and bodies of the EU
  • 8.70.02 Financial regulations
New
1.20.05
Public access to information and documents, administrative practice
8.40.08
Agencies and bodies of the EU
8.70.02
Financial regulations
procedure/summary
  • Repealed by
procedure/title
Old
European Training Foundation: budget and finances, access to documents (amend. Regulation (EEC) No 1360/90)
New
European Training Foundation: budget and finances, access to documents (amend. Regulation (EEC) No 1360/90)
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2002/0406/COM_COM(2002)0406_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2002/0406/COM_COM(2002)0406_EN.pdf
activities/8/docs/1/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2003:245:TOC
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:245:SOM:EN:HTML
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
activities/8/docs/1/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:245:SOM:EN:HTML
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2003:245:TOC
procedure/subject/1
4.40.15 Vocational education and training
procedure/subject/2
Old
8.70.01 Financing of the budget, own resources
New
8.70.02 Financial regulations
activities
  • date: 2002-07-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2002/0406/COM_COM(2002)0406_EN.pdf title: COM(2002)0406 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52002PC0406(02):EN body: EC type: Legislative proposal published commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget
  • date: 2002-09-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2002-08-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: NI name: DELL'ALBA Gianfranco body: EP responsible: False committee: CONT date: 2002-09-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PSE name: VAN HULTEN Michiel body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2002-09-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HERNÁNDEZ MOLLAR Jorge Salvador
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2002-08-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: NI name: DELL'ALBA Gianfranco body: EP responsible: False committee: CONT date: 2002-09-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PSE name: VAN HULTEN Michiel body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2002-09-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HERNÁNDEZ MOLLAR Jorge Salvador docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2002-336&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A5-0336/2002 date: 2002-10-02T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2002-10-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2002-480 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0480/2002 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2003-03-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2003-111 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0111/2003 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2003-06-18T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 2516
  • date: 2003-06-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2003-06-18T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2003-09-29T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32003R1648 title: Regulation 2003/1648 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:245:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ L 245 29.09.2003, p. 0022-0024
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2002-08-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: NI name: DELL'ALBA Gianfranco
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: CONT date: 2002-09-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PSE name: VAN HULTEN Michiel
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2002-09-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HERNÁNDEZ MOLLAR Jorge Salvador
links
European Commission
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget
procedure
reference
2002/0171(CNS)
subtype
Legislation
legal_basis
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 308
stage_reached
Procedure completed
summary
Repealed by
instrument
Regulation
title
European Training Foundation: budget and finances, access to documents (amend. Regulation (EEC) No 1360/90)
type
CNS - Consultation procedure
final
subject