BETA


2003/2254(INI) Croatia: membership application from February 2003

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET BALTAS Alexandros (icon: PES PES)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 134o

Events

2004/04/20
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Details

Croatia submitted its application for membership of the European Union on 21 February 2003. In accordance with the provisions of Article 49 of the Treaty, the Commission has, at the request of the Council, prepared an Opinion on Croatia’s request for membership.

Croatia is preparing for membership on the basis of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement signed on 29 October 2001 and the Interim Agreement which entered into force in March 2002.

To recall, the criteria set out by the Copenhagen European Council for candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe are as follows:

- stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for and protection of minorities;

- the existence of a functioning market economy, as well as the ability to cope with competitive pressures and market forces within the Union;

- the ability to take on the obligations of membership, including adherence to the aims of political, economic and monetary union.

On the political criteria, the Commission’s assessment is as follows:

Croatia has stable democratic institutions which function properly respecting the limits of their competences and co-operating with each other. The 2000 and 2003 elections were free and fair. The opposition plays a normal part in the operation of the institutions. There are no major problems over assuring the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights.

However, Croatia needs to take measures to ensure that the rights of minorities, in particular of the Serb minority, are fully respected. It should speed up the implementation of the constitutional Law on National Minorities and accelerate efforts to facilitate the return of Serb refugees from Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Croatia needs to make substantial improvements in the functioning of the judicial system. The effectiveness of the fight against corruption needs further strengthening.

Croatia’s cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia has improved significantly in the past months. In April 2004, the Prosecutor stated that Croatia is now cooperating fully with ICTY. Croatia needs to maintain full cooperation and take all necessary steps to ensure that the remaining indictee is located and transferred to ICTY in The Hague. Croatia remains committed to regional co-operation; sustained efforts are needed in this area. In particular to resolve border issues with neighbouring countries in line with international standards for dispute settlement, and issues arising from the unilateral declaration of the protected "Ecological and Fishing Zone"in the Adriatic.

On the economic criteria:

Croatia can be regarded as a functioning market economy. It should be able to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union in the medium term, provided that it continues implementing its reform programme to remove remaining weaknesses. In Croatia, there is an increasing political consensus on the essentials of economic policies.

The Croatian economy has achieved a considerable degree of macroeconomic stability with low inflation. Enhanced economic stability and structural reforms undertaken so far permit the working of market mechanisms. This holds in particular for the liberalisation of prices and trade as well as for privatisation, albeit to a lesser extent. Croatia is characterised by a relatively well educated labour force and good road transport and telecommunication infrastructure. The country has a well developed banking sector and a competitive tourism industry. Croatia’s economy is already well integrated with that of the EU.

However, the working of market mechanisms still needs some improvement. In particular, the performance of the judicial sector needs to be enhanced and high administrative burdens as well as incomplete systems of cadastre and land registry need to be addressed. Enterprise restructuring and privatisation has been slower than expected and some large state and formerly socially-owned enterprises still play an important role in the economy. In particular the shipbuilding and agriculture sectors need to be modernised. The necessary reforms of the fiscal and social security systems as well as the public administration are not yet completed and fiscal consolidation needs to be vigorously pursued. Full integration in the single market and the adoption of the acquis would, at this stage, cause difficulties for a number of sectors in withstanding the competition within the single market. Addressing the identified weaknesses should contribute to higher investment and growth, thereby enhancing Croatia’s competitiveness.

Capacity to take on the obligations of membership:

- Croatia has made significant efforts to align its legislation with the acquis, particularly in areas related to Internal Market and trade. These efforts need to be continued vigorously. Administrative capacity is uneven and enforcement of legislation needs to be improved. Croatia needs to continue legislative alignment while at the same time strengthening administrative and judicial structures that are necessary for the effective implementation and enforcement of the acquis.

If it continues its efforts, Croatia should not have major difficulties in applying the acquis in the medium term in the following fields: Economic and Monetary Union; Statistics; Industrial policy; Small and medium-sized enterprises; Science and research; Education and training; Culture and audio-visual policy; External relations; Common foreign and security policy; Financial and budgetary provisions.

Croatia will have to make further efforts to align its legislation with the acquis and to implement and enforce it in the medium term in the following fields: Free movement of capital; Company law; Fisheries; Transport; Energy; Consumer and health protection; Customs union; Financial control.

Croatia will have to make considerable and sustained efforts to align its legislation with the acquis and to effectively implement and enforce it in the medium term in the following fields: Free movement of goods; Free movement of persons; Freedom to provide services; Competition; Agriculture; Taxation; Social policy and employment; Telecommunications and information technologies; Regional policy; Justice and home affairs.

For the environment, very significant efforts will be needed, including substantial investment and strengthening of administrative capacity for the enforcement of legislation. Full compliance with the acquis could be achieved only in the long term and would necessitate increased levels of investment.

In the light of these considerations, the Commission recommends that negotiations for accession to the European Union should be opened with Croatia. To assist Croatia in the preparation of accession negotiations, a comprehensive screening exercise would need to be undertaken. Furthermore, the Commission recommends that the EU develops a pre-accession strategy for Croatia and is preparing the necessary proposals to this effect.

2004/04/01
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
2004/04/01
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Documents
2004/04/01
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2004/03/31
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2004/03/17
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2004/03/17
   EP - Vote in committee
2004/03/16
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2003/11/26
   EP - BALTAS Alexandros (PES) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2003/11/17
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2004-01-20T00:00:00
docs
title: PE329.364
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/1
date
2004-03-11T00:00:00
docs
title: PE329.364/AM
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/2/date
Old
2004-03-17T00:00:00
New
2004-03-16T00:00:00
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2004-0206_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2004-0206_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2004-0273_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2004-0273_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2004-03-17T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2004-0206_EN.html title: A5-0206/2004
events/2
date
2004-03-17T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2004-0206_EN.html title: A5-0206/2004
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20040331&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20040331&type=CRE
events/4
date
2004-04-01T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2004-0273_EN.html title: T5-0273/2004
summary
events/4
date
2004-04-01T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2004-0273_EN.html title: T5-0273/2004
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 134o
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 134
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: BALTAS Alexandros date: 2003-11-26T00:00:00 group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense
committee
AFET
date
2003-11-26T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BALTAS Alexandros group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2004-206&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2004-0206_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-273
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2004-0273_EN.html
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2004-206&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2004-0206_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-273
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2004-0273_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2003-11-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2003-11-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense rapporteur: group: PSE name: BALTAS Alexandros
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2003-11-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense rapporteur: group: PSE name: BALTAS Alexandros docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2004-206&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A5-0206/2004 date: 2004-03-17T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2004-03-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20040331&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2004-04-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-273 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0273/2004 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense
committee
AFET
date
2003-11-26T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BALTAS Alexandros group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2003-11-26T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense
rapporteur
group: PSE name: BALTAS Alexandros
docs
  • date: 2004-01-20T00:00:00 docs: title: PE329.364 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2004-03-11T00:00:00 docs: title: PE329.364/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2004-03-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2004-206&language=EN title: A5-0206/2004 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2004-04-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-273 title: T5-0273/2004 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2004:103E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 103 29.04.2004, p. 0685-0822 E summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2004-04-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0257/COM_COM(2004)0257_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0257 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=257 title: EUR-Lex summary: Croatia submitted its application for membership of the European Union on 21 February 2003. In accordance with the provisions of Article 49 of the Treaty, the Commission has, at the request of the Council, prepared an Opinion on Croatia’s request for membership. Croatia is preparing for membership on the basis of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement signed on 29 October 2001 and the Interim Agreement which entered into force in March 2002. To recall, the criteria set out by the Copenhagen European Council for candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe are as follows: - stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for and protection of minorities; - the existence of a functioning market economy, as well as the ability to cope with competitive pressures and market forces within the Union; - the ability to take on the obligations of membership, including adherence to the aims of political, economic and monetary union. On the political criteria, the Commission’s assessment is as follows: Croatia has stable democratic institutions which function properly respecting the limits of their competences and co-operating with each other. The 2000 and 2003 elections were free and fair. The opposition plays a normal part in the operation of the institutions. There are no major problems over assuring the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights. However, Croatia needs to take measures to ensure that the rights of minorities, in particular of the Serb minority, are fully respected. It should speed up the implementation of the constitutional Law on National Minorities and accelerate efforts to facilitate the return of Serb refugees from Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Croatia needs to make substantial improvements in the functioning of the judicial system. The effectiveness of the fight against corruption needs further strengthening. Croatia’s cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia has improved significantly in the past months. In April 2004, the Prosecutor stated that Croatia is now cooperating fully with ICTY. Croatia needs to maintain full cooperation and take all necessary steps to ensure that the remaining indictee is located and transferred to ICTY in The Hague. Croatia remains committed to regional co-operation; sustained efforts are needed in this area. In particular to resolve border issues with neighbouring countries in line with international standards for dispute settlement, and issues arising from the unilateral declaration of the protected "Ecological and Fishing Zone"in the Adriatic. On the economic criteria: Croatia can be regarded as a functioning market economy. It should be able to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union in the medium term, provided that it continues implementing its reform programme to remove remaining weaknesses. In Croatia, there is an increasing political consensus on the essentials of economic policies. The Croatian economy has achieved a considerable degree of macroeconomic stability with low inflation. Enhanced economic stability and structural reforms undertaken so far permit the working of market mechanisms. This holds in particular for the liberalisation of prices and trade as well as for privatisation, albeit to a lesser extent. Croatia is characterised by a relatively well educated labour force and good road transport and telecommunication infrastructure. The country has a well developed banking sector and a competitive tourism industry. Croatia’s economy is already well integrated with that of the EU. However, the working of market mechanisms still needs some improvement. In particular, the performance of the judicial sector needs to be enhanced and high administrative burdens as well as incomplete systems of cadastre and land registry need to be addressed. Enterprise restructuring and privatisation has been slower than expected and some large state and formerly socially-owned enterprises still play an important role in the economy. In particular the shipbuilding and agriculture sectors need to be modernised. The necessary reforms of the fiscal and social security systems as well as the public administration are not yet completed and fiscal consolidation needs to be vigorously pursued. Full integration in the single market and the adoption of the acquis would, at this stage, cause difficulties for a number of sectors in withstanding the competition within the single market. Addressing the identified weaknesses should contribute to higher investment and growth, thereby enhancing Croatia’s competitiveness. Capacity to take on the obligations of membership: - Croatia has made significant efforts to align its legislation with the acquis, particularly in areas related to Internal Market and trade. These efforts need to be continued vigorously. Administrative capacity is uneven and enforcement of legislation needs to be improved. Croatia needs to continue legislative alignment while at the same time strengthening administrative and judicial structures that are necessary for the effective implementation and enforcement of the acquis. If it continues its efforts, Croatia should not have major difficulties in applying the acquis in the medium term in the following fields: Economic and Monetary Union; Statistics; Industrial policy; Small and medium-sized enterprises; Science and research; Education and training; Culture and audio-visual policy; External relations; Common foreign and security policy; Financial and budgetary provisions. Croatia will have to make further efforts to align its legislation with the acquis and to implement and enforce it in the medium term in the following fields: Free movement of capital; Company law; Fisheries; Transport; Energy; Consumer and health protection; Customs union; Financial control. Croatia will have to make considerable and sustained efforts to align its legislation with the acquis and to effectively implement and enforce it in the medium term in the following fields: Free movement of goods; Free movement of persons; Freedom to provide services; Competition; Agriculture; Taxation; Social policy and employment; Telecommunications and information technologies; Regional policy; Justice and home affairs. For the environment, very significant efforts will be needed, including substantial investment and strengthening of administrative capacity for the enforcement of legislation. Full compliance with the acquis could be achieved only in the long term and would necessitate increased levels of investment. In the light of these considerations, the Commission recommends that negotiations for accession to the European Union should be opened with Croatia. To assist Croatia in the preparation of accession negotiations, a comprehensive screening exercise would need to be undertaken. Furthermore, the Commission recommends that the EU develops a pre-accession strategy for Croatia and is preparing the necessary proposals to this effect. type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
events
  • date: 2003-11-17T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2004-03-17T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 2004-03-17T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2004-206&language=EN title: A5-0206/2004
  • date: 2004-03-31T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20040331&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2004-04-01T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-273 title: T5-0273/2004 summary:
  • date: 2004-04-01T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/5/20468
    New
    • AFET/5/20468
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 134
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 134
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 8.20.01 Candidate countries
    New
    8.20.01
    Candidate countries
    activities
    • date: 2003-11-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2003-11-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense rapporteur: group: PSE name: BALTAS Alexandros
    • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2003-11-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense rapporteur: group: PSE name: BALTAS Alexandros docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2004-206&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A5-0206/2004 date: 2004-03-17T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 2004-03-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20040331&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2004-04-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-273 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0273/2004 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2003-11-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense rapporteur: group: PSE name: BALTAS Alexandros
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      AFET/5/20468
      geographical_area
      Croatia
      reference
      2003/2254(INI)
      title
      Croatia: membership application from February 2003
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 134
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      8.20.01 Candidate countries