BETA


2004/0151(COD) Audiovisual sector: implementation of a programme of support for this European sector, MEDIA 2007

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CULT HIERONYMI Ruth (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Former Responsible Committee CULT HIERONYMI Ruth (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Former Committee Opinion AFET PETERLE Alojz (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Former Committee Opinion LIBE GUARDANS CAMBÓ Ignasi (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Former Committee Opinion BUDG DOUAY Brigitte (icon: PSE PSE)
Former Committee Opinion ITRE TRAUTMANN Catherine (icon: PSE PSE)
Former Committee Opinion CONT
Former Committee Opinion FEMM PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU Marie (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Former Committee Opinion EMPL
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 150-p4, EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 157-p3

Events

2010/12/20
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The aim of this report is to provide an interim evaluation of the MEDIA 2007 programme in accordance with Decision No 1718/2006/EC (MEDIA 2007). The Decision also requires that evaluation of the EU’s participation in the European Audiovisual Observatory be carried out within the framework of monitoring and evaluation of the MEDIA programme. The report sets out the main results obtained over the past three years of implementation and the recommendations for possible adjustments. It covers the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2009 and is based on the conclusions of the interim evaluation by an external consulting group.

The report notes that over 5 000 projects were supported by MEDIA 2007 over the first three years of implementation. European co-financing for these projects amounts to around EUR 296 million, i.e. 39% of the programme budget over the entire period. More than 3 000 organisations applied for support from the MEDIA 2007 programme over the first three years (compared with less than 2 000 over the entire MEDIA Plus programme period) and more than 1 400 organisations were selected. The number of applications for support from organisations in the new Member States increased slightly under the MEDIA 2007 programme. The organisations selected by MEDIA 2007 are producers (56%), distributors (31%) and promoters (11%). They are usually very small companies (66% have a turnover of less than EUR 1.5 million, 80% have a turnover of less than EUR 4 million). Beneficiaries of MEDIA 2007 are located all over Europe (98 out of 105 regions).

The five largest countries (Germany, Spain, France, Italy, and United Kingdom) receive almost two thirds of the amounts committed by MEDIA, in proportion to the relative importance of these markets in Europe. The ten other EU-15 countries together with Switzerland, Iceland and Norway receive on average 25% of the amounts committed, but this share is diminishing. The share of the "new" Member States is stable, at around 8%.

Conclusions of the evaluation : MEDIA 2007 is well equipped to meet the sector's needs because, among other things, it is internally coherent, is firmly grounded in the European audiovisual scene and is designed to support change in the sector. In the vast majority of cases, MEDIA is considered to be complementary to existing national provisions, as it supports work which receives little or no national subsidisation. It also offers significant added value due to the strong European dimension which it gives to the projects it supports, and also allows them to be more ambitious. Lastly, the programme seems to inspire national policies. A certain number of developments have been noted in various countries. For instance, new legislative provisions are in the drafting stage or have just entered into force in Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Norway and Slovenia.

However, the evaluator identified avenues for improving certain lines of action:

support for interactive works could become more effective, in particular through achieving greater clarity as to their target audiences; support from MEDIA 2007 for TV distribution is important because it responds to a pronounced sectoral need. It makes a significant contribution to securing producers' rights in some countries. However, its effectiveness is impaired by a number of factors: discrepancy between the type of works supported and the programming needs of European channels; contradiction between the required large number of broadcasters and the existence of a minimum guarantee provided by a distributor; discrepancy between developments in market prices and the investments required by MEDIA; imbalances in the geographical distribution of support.

Furthermore, the effect of certain actions remains marginal for reasons external to the programme and linked to the market in which they are taken:

i2i support helps to effectively reduce financial costs, but it is not wide-ranging enough to generate visible effects in terms of access to financing; support for video-on-demand (VOD) does not yet sufficiently foster the circulation of European works as the market remains very weak; as regards the objectives of preserving and promoting cultural diversity and the positive discrimination mechanisms mentioned in point 6.2, the restricted scope of the programme does not allow for a significant impact in terms of reducing the disparities between countries with low and high audiovisual production capacities. While the allocations to organisations from the "new" Member States are increasing, the budget share remains the same (around 8%). The average budget per organisation in these countries is therefore progressively decreasing.

Position of the Commission : although the interim evaluation of the MEDIA 2007 programme was conducted at an early stage in implementation, it confirms the positive results of the programme actions in favour of the European audiovisual sector. It reaffirms the relevance of its objectives and the effectiveness of its actions, particularly as regards making the sector more competitive. Furthermore, it confirms the added value it brings to national interventions. The market data also indicate that the European audiovisual sector continues to suffer from its traditional weaknesses , namely market fragmentation and the poor circulation of European works outside their country of origin.

Action should therefore continue to be taken in line with changes in market needs. The Commission will make adjustments to the MEDIA 2007 programme for the remaining period in order to improve its efficiency and effectiveness and ensure it is better adapted to market needs, within the limits of the existing legal basis, and in line with the evaluator's recommendations. Other adjustments are being developed and will be in place for the second half of the programme's implementation period. These will be examined in the next Communication on the continuation of the programme.

Furthermore, the Commission will integrate the more long-term strategic recommendations made by the evaluator into the preparation of the next programme, to be launched in 2013. Lines of action will be examined as part of the impact study to be carried out in preparation for this programme.

2006/11/24
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to implement the MEDIA 2007 programme.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision No 1718/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the implementation of a programme of support for the European audiovisual sector (MEDIA 2007).

CONTENT: this Decision establishes a support programme for the European audiovisual sector, referred to as MEDIA 2007. It covers the period 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013.

The programme is intended to strengthen the audiovisual sector economically thereby enabling it to play a more effective cultural role. The global objectives of the programme are:

a) to preserve and enhance European cultural and linguistic diversity as well as Europe ’s cinematographic and audiovisual heritage and to guarantee its accessibility to the public;

b) to increase the circulation and viewing of European audiovisual works inside and outside of the European Union;

c) to strengthen the competitiveness of the European audiovisual sector within an open and competitive framework and to promote links between audiovisual professionals.

In order to achieve these objectives the programme will support the following actions:

a) the acquisition and improvement of skills in the audiovisual field and the development of European audiovisual works;

b) the distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works;

c) pilot projects to ensure that the programme adjusts to market developments.

Intervention priorities are as follows:

a) fostering creativity in the audiovisual sector as well as disseminating Europe ’s cinematographic and audiovisual heritage;

b) strengthening the European audiovisual sector – particularly for SME’s;

c) reducing country-wide imbalances in production capacity;

d) supporting market development vis-à-vis digitisation – including the promotion of attractive digital catalogues of European films on digital platforms.

As far as the financial envelope is concerned the programme will benefit from a budget of € 754 950 000. The indicative breakdown of the amount is set out in Annex to the Decision. Any legal and natural persons can benefit from MEDIA 2007 with the Commission deciding, who may be exempted from verification of the professional skills and qualifications required. The Commission will also be responsible for taking account of the type of activity supported, the specific profile of the target public from the audiovisual sector and the objectives of the programme. The financial aid awarded under the terms of the programme may not exceed 50% of the final costs of the operation supported. However, in cases expressly provided for in the Annex, financial aid may be as high as 75%. Any such aid will be granted whilst ensuring that award procedures are both transparent and objective.

The Commission will be responsible for ensuring that the actions covered are subject to prior evaluation, monitoring and ex-post evaluation. The results of the process of monitoring and evaluation will be taken into account during the implementation phase. The Commission will need to ensure that the programme is evaluated regularly, externally and independently.

The Commission will present to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions:

a) an interim evaluation report on the results and the qualitative and quantitative aspects of implementing the programme no later than three years after the start of the programme;

b) a communication on the continuation of the programme no later than four years after the start of the programme;

c) a detailed ex-post evaluation report by 31 December 2015 covering the implementation and results of the programme on completion of its implementation.

The Commission will publish and disseminate via the MEDIA Desks any relevant statistics and analyses.

ENTRY INTO FROCE: 25 November 2006.

APPLICATION: 1 January 2007.

2006/11/15
   CSL - Draft final act
Documents
2006/11/15
   CSL - Final act signed
2006/11/15
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/10/24
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2006/10/24
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2006/10/24
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted the resolution drafted by Ruth HIERONYMI (EPP-ED, DE) and approved the Council's common position.

Documents
2006/10/11
   EP - Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
Documents
2006/10/11
   EP - Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
Documents
2006/10/10
   EP - Vote in committee, 2nd reading
Details

The committee adopted the report by Ruth HIERONYMI (EPP-ED, DE) approving the Council's common position unamended under the 2nd reading of the codecision procedure.

2006/09/18
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2006/09/07
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading
2006/09/04
   EP - HIERONYMI Ruth (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in CULT
2006/08/10
   EC - Commission communication on Council's position
Details

The Commission notes that the Council reached agreement on this proposal through unanimity.

Since the Common Position, in essence, accepts most of the amendments proposed by Parliament and given that the Common Position is in line with the Commission’s original vision of the proposed Decision, the Commission has decided to accept the Council’s conclusions.

Certain minor changes have been introduced by the Council; two of which are substantive.

The first substantive change refers to the comitology procedure, whereby the Committee arrangements implemented under the current MEDIA programme will continue.

The second change refers to the revised budget, which now stands at EUR 671 million and which is the result of agreement found for the Financial Perspectives (2007-2013).

The inclusion of an indicative breakdown in the Annex is in line with the existing Decision governing the MEDIA programme.

2006/07/24
   CSL - Council position
Details

The Council’s common position is fully in line with that of the Commission’s initial proposal on the MEDIA 2007 programme. With agreement found on the Financial Framework for 2007-2013 the budget for the programme has been set at EUR 671 million at 2004 prices, taking account of inflation.

The Council has also opted to continue with two provisions in the existing MEDIA programme.

The first is to continue using an indicative breakdown of resources in Annex to the Decision, broken down as follows:

- Acquisition and improvement of skills approximately 7%

- Development at least 20%

- Distribution at least 55%

- Promotion approximately 9%

- Pilot projects approximately 4%

- Horizontal issues at least 5%

The second is to maintain the current practice of using the “management committee procedure” in the following cases:

- for training and promotion projects with a total Community contribution of over EUR 200 000 per beneficiary, per year .

- for development projects with a total Community contribution of over EUR 200 000 per beneficiary, per year; and

- for distribution projects with a total Community contribution of over EUR 300 000 per beneficiary, per year.

These thresholds are in line with current practice.

Concerning Parliamentary amendments, the Council has accepted most of them, albeit with slight rewording or minor linguistic changes. Taking account of the Interinstitutional Agreement on the Financial Framework 2007 – 2013, the Council decided to reject all amendments concerning the overall budget.

The other amendments rejected concern , inter alia ,:

- extending positive discrimination measures to Member States with low production capacity and restricted linguistic areas;

- reducing the number of broadcasters in different Member States from three to two;

- on subtitling; and

- on media desks.

To conclude, the Council considers its common position to be both balanced and appropriate for the European film industry. It also considers that it has taken account of the Parliament’s and the Commission’s concerns.

2006/07/24
   CSL - Council Meeting
2006/07/23
   CSL - Council position published
Details

The Council’s common position is fully in line with that of the Commission’s initial proposal on the MEDIA 2007 programme. With agreement found on the Financial Framework for 2007-2013 the budget for the programme has been set at EUR 671 million at 2004 prices, taking account of inflation.

The Council has also opted to continue with two provisions in the existing MEDIA programme.

The first is to continue using an indicative breakdown of resources in Annex to the Decision, broken down as follows:

- Acquisition and improvement of skills approximately 7%

- Development at least 20%

- Distribution at least 55%

- Promotion approximately 9%

- Pilot projects approximately 4%

- Horizontal issues at least 5%

The second is to maintain the current practice of using the “management committee procedure” in the following cases:

- for training and promotion projects with a total Community contribution of over EUR 200 000 per beneficiary, per year .

- for development projects with a total Community contribution of over EUR 200 000 per beneficiary, per year; and

- for distribution projects with a total Community contribution of over EUR 300 000 per beneficiary, per year.

These thresholds are in line with current practice.

Concerning Parliamentary amendments, the Council has accepted most of them, albeit with slight rewording or minor linguistic changes. Taking account of the Interinstitutional Agreement on the Financial Framework 2007 – 2013, the Council decided to reject all amendments concerning the overall budget.

The other amendments rejected concern , inter alia ,:

- extending positive discrimination measures to Member States with low production capacity and restricted linguistic areas;

- reducing the number of broadcasters in different Member States from three to two;

- on subtitling; and

- on media desks.

To conclude, the Council considers its common position to be both balanced and appropriate for the European film industry. It also considers that it has taken account of the Parliament’s and the Commission’s concerns.

Documents
2006/05/18
   CSL - Council Meeting
2005/11/14
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council reached a partial political agreement on a decision establishing the Media 2007 programme, which is aimed at providing financial support for the European audiovisual sector for the 2007-2013 period.

The "partial" nature of this agreement is due to the fact that the budgetary aspects have been excluded pending the outcome of the discussions on the future Community financial framework (Financial Perspective 2007/2013). It is therefore expected that this item will return to the (Education, Youth and Culture) Council's agenda at some future date in order to finalise the budget and its final breakdown aspects.

Documents
2005/11/14
   CSL - Council Meeting
2005/10/25
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Ruth HIERONYMI (EPP-ED, DE) making several amendments to the Commission’s proposal. (Please see the summary of 12/09/2005.)

The resolution states that public support to cinema at European, national, regional or local level is essential to overcome the sector’s structural difficulties and allow the European audiovisual industry to meet the challenge of globalisation. Public support schemes should not be open to liberalisation in the framework of international trade negotiations. The resolution also highlights the need for better digital services as well as an end to the chronic under-capitalisation of the European audiovisual sector. Parliament stated that t hroughout the EU one major obstacle to competition is the almost complete lack of companies specialising in providing loan financing in the audiovisual sector. Improved digital services such as European cataloguing are also highlighted as a priority to facilitate access to cinematographic works and overcome fragmentation.

The report also makes clear that a ll actions adopted under the programme must be compatible with fundamental rights relating to freedom of expression and media pluralism.

Parliament inserted a new paragraph stating that the cooperation of MEDIA Desks in networks, especially proximity networks, must be encouraged in order to facilitate exchange and contacts between professionals, and create public awareness of key events in the programme as well as prizes and awards; the MEDIA Desks play a valuable role as information and service suppliers in facilitating the emergence of new audiovisual centres. The Commission must encourage the setting-up of MEDIA desks and MEDIA antennae in countries and regions with low production capacity and promote their visibility. Furthermore, cooperation between the MEDIA programme and Eurimages needs to be strengthened, but this should not entail integration of financial and administrative matters.

The Commission must present an interim evaluation report on the results , on matching the programme to the technological context and its impact on the European market, and on the qualitative and quantitative aspects of implementing the programme , three years after its adoption. The report shall in particular make it possible to assess the effectiveness of structural improvement measures in countries that have recently joined the Union .

2005/10/25
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Ruth HIERONYMI (EPP-ED, DE) making several amendments to the Commission’s proposal. (Please see the summary of 12/09/2005.)

The resolution states that public support to cinema at European, national, regional or local level is essential to overcome the sector’s structural difficulties and allow the European audiovisual industry to meet the challenge of globalisation. Public support schemes should not be open to liberalisation in the framework of international trade negotiations. The resolution also highlights the need for better digital services as well as an end to the chronic under-capitalisation of the European audiovisual sector. Parliament stated that t hroughout the EU one major obstacle to competition is the almost complete lack of companies specialising in providing loan financing in the audiovisual sector. Improved digital services such as European cataloguing are also highlighted as a priority to facilitate access to cinematographic works and overcome fragmentation.

The report also makes clear that a ll actions adopted under the programme must be compatible with fundamental rights relating to freedom of expression and media pluralism.

Parliament inserted a new paragraph stating that the cooperation of MEDIA Desks in networks, especially proximity networks, must be encouraged in order to facilitate exchange and contacts between professionals, and create public awareness of key events in the programme as well as prizes and awards; the MEDIA Desks play a valuable role as information and service suppliers in facilitating the emergence of new audiovisual centres. The Commission must encourage the setting-up of MEDIA desks and MEDIA antennae in countries and regions with low production capacity and promote their visibility. Furthermore, cooperation between the MEDIA programme and Eurimages needs to be strengthened, but this should not entail integration of financial and administrative matters.

The Commission must present an interim evaluation report on the results , on matching the programme to the technological context and its impact on the European market, and on the qualitative and quantitative aspects of implementing the programme , three years after its adoption. The report shall in particular make it possible to assess the effectiveness of structural improvement measures in countries that have recently joined the Union .

Documents
2005/10/24
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2005/09/29
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2005/09/29
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Documents
2005/09/12
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
Details

The committee adopted the report by Ruth HIERONYMI ( EPP-ED , DE ) amending the proposal under the 1st reading of the codecision procedure:

- the programme's general objectives should include preserving and enhancing European linguistic diversity, strengthening the competitiveness of the European audiovisual sector on international markets as well as European markets, strengthening the financing structure of the sector, especially for SMEs, developing the digitisation of the sector and improving the marketing of European audiovisual works;

- the specific objectives should include encouraging the use of subtitling "as a less costly support to the distribution and diffusion of European films outside their national borders" and improving the European and international public's access to Europe 's cinematographic and audiovisual heritage;

- as regards participation by third countries, the committee felt that European countries covered by the European Neighbourhood Policy should be able to benefit from cooperation with the programme if additional finances become available;

- the Commission should "adhere to the proportionality principle" in connection with eligibility criteria and the documents to be supplied and filled in;

- greater support should be given to cross-border projects and co-productions;

- independent producers should receive particular encouragement and support;

- the programme's contribution to other EU policies should include promoting media pluralism and independence and promoting equality between women and men;

- the Commission should ensure that the actions under the programme are subjected to prior evaluation, monitoring and ex-post evaluation.

Lastly, MEPs wanted to see innovative distribution platforms, more European film festivals and the establishment of a Pier Paolo Pasolini Prize for New Talents.

2005/08/30
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2005/07/26
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2005/07/19
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2005/07/14
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2005/06/20
   EP - PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU Marie (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2005/05/23
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

Pending the European Parliament’s opinion, the Council issued an overall partial guideline on the MEDIA 2007 programme. The aim being to lay down the Council’s position on the actions which should be supported by the Community in the framework programme. The “partial” nature of this guideline is due to the fact that the budget aspects have still to be discussed. These will not be known until the definition of the future financial perspectives 2007-2013.

Documents
2005/05/23
   CSL - Council Meeting
2005/05/13
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2005/04/06
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
2005/02/23
   CofR - Committee of the Regions: opinion
2005/01/31
   EP - DOUAY Brigitte (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2004/10/07
   EP - TRAUTMANN Catherine (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2004/10/05
   EP - GUARDANS CAMBÓ Ignasi (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2004/09/22
   EP - HIERONYMI Ruth (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in CULT
2004/09/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2004/09/13
   EP - PETERLE Alojz (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2004/07/14
   EC - Legislative proposal
Details

PURPOSE: to establish a programme for the European audiovisual sector (MEDIA 2007.)

PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council.

CONTENT: this proposal comes about due to the Commission's assessment that the European audiovisual sector is fragmented in terms of both its production structure and the cultural framework in which it operates. Whilst it is clear that this fragmentation has resulted in a culturally diverse and highly independent production industry, providing a voice for the different cultural traditions that make up our European heritage, it has, however, prevented European industry from achieving a larger market share with respect to non- European imports both within the Union and worldwide. The European audiovisual industry struggles to match the high competitiveness of its American counterpart. New Community action for the audiovisual industry should contribute to translating European cultural values into a competitive worldwide industry, by overcoming the obstacles that prevent operators from benefiting from the advantages of the Internal Market for non-national audiovisual productions. A more competitive audiovisual industry will have positive effects on growth and employment for the whole Union and will consolidate the European cultural values at the basis of European citizenship.

The new programme will focus on supporting the creative process at all levels of the production chain with the objective of enabling the sector to fully exploit the economic and cultural potential of the European Internal Market. Community action will therefore be integrated into a single programme intervening in the pre-production and in the post production phases in line with the principle of subsidiarity.

MEDIA 2007 will have as global objectives, to:

1) Preserve and enhance European cultural diversity and its cinematographic and audiovisual heritage, guarantee its accessibility for European citizens and promote intercultural dialogue;

2) Increase the circulation of European audiovisual works inside and outside the European Union;

3) Strengthen the competitiveness of the European audiovisual sector in the framework of an open and competitive market.

The programme will take into account four horizontal priorities:

- the importance of the creative process within the European audiovisual sector and the cultural value of Europe's cinematographic and audiovisual heritage need to be integrated within the actions proposed.

- strengthening of the production structures of the SMEs, which constitute the core of the European audiovisual sector, as a means of enhancing its competitiveness. This will mean contributing to the spread of a business culture for the sector and facilitating private investments in the sector.

- the programme will reduce the imbalances between countries with a high production capacity and countries with low production capacity or a restricted linguistic area. This priority responds to the need to preserve and enhance cultural diversity and inter-cultural dialogue in Europe.

- the programme will follow and support market developments with regard to digitisation. The programme will put in place measures to accompany the changes that digitisation is producing in the audiovisual sector at all stages of the production and distribution chain as well as in terms of new competencies for the professionals of the sector.

With regard to specific objectives:

Acquisition and improvement of skills in the audiovisual sector : the programme will support projects aiming at improving the creative and management skills of European audiovisual professionals as well as adapting their technical skills to digital technologies.

Development : the programme will support the development phase of production from independent SMEs in the documentary, animation and drama genres as well as multimedia. It will provide grants to independent production companies for the development of single projects. It will support the development of a catalogue of works both for companies with a limited investment capacity and for companies with higher investment capacity.

Distribution : Community action will concentrate its efforts on transnational distribution support, in line with the principle of subsidiarity and as a complementary approach to Member State support mechanisms.

Promotion : the programme will encourage the circulation of European cinematographic works and television programmes within the framework of professional markets within Europe and world-wide.

The budget for implementing this programme is EUR 1 055 million .

For a more detailed assessment of the budgetary implications of this proposal, please refer to the financial statement.

2004/07/14
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2004/07/13
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to establish a programme for the European audiovisual sector (MEDIA 2007.)

PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council.

CONTENT: this proposal comes about due to the Commission's assessment that the European audiovisual sector is fragmented in terms of both its production structure and the cultural framework in which it operates. Whilst it is clear that this fragmentation has resulted in a culturally diverse and highly independent production industry, providing a voice for the different cultural traditions that make up our European heritage, it has, however, prevented European industry from achieving a larger market share with respect to non- European imports both within the Union and worldwide. The European audiovisual industry struggles to match the high competitiveness of its American counterpart. New Community action for the audiovisual industry should contribute to translating European cultural values into a competitive worldwide industry, by overcoming the obstacles that prevent operators from benefiting from the advantages of the Internal Market for non-national audiovisual productions. A more competitive audiovisual industry will have positive effects on growth and employment for the whole Union and will consolidate the European cultural values at the basis of European citizenship.

The new programme will focus on supporting the creative process at all levels of the production chain with the objective of enabling the sector to fully exploit the economic and cultural potential of the European Internal Market. Community action will therefore be integrated into a single programme intervening in the pre-production and in the post production phases in line with the principle of subsidiarity.

MEDIA 2007 will have as global objectives, to:

1) Preserve and enhance European cultural diversity and its cinematographic and audiovisual heritage, guarantee its accessibility for European citizens and promote intercultural dialogue;

2) Increase the circulation of European audiovisual works inside and outside the European Union;

3) Strengthen the competitiveness of the European audiovisual sector in the framework of an open and competitive market.

The programme will take into account four horizontal priorities:

- the importance of the creative process within the European audiovisual sector and the cultural value of Europe's cinematographic and audiovisual heritage need to be integrated within the actions proposed.

- strengthening of the production structures of the SMEs, which constitute the core of the European audiovisual sector, as a means of enhancing its competitiveness. This will mean contributing to the spread of a business culture for the sector and facilitating private investments in the sector.

- the programme will reduce the imbalances between countries with a high production capacity and countries with low production capacity or a restricted linguistic area. This priority responds to the need to preserve and enhance cultural diversity and inter-cultural dialogue in Europe.

- the programme will follow and support market developments with regard to digitisation. The programme will put in place measures to accompany the changes that digitisation is producing in the audiovisual sector at all stages of the production and distribution chain as well as in terms of new competencies for the professionals of the sector.

With regard to specific objectives:

Acquisition and improvement of skills in the audiovisual sector : the programme will support projects aiming at improving the creative and management skills of European audiovisual professionals as well as adapting their technical skills to digital technologies.

Development : the programme will support the development phase of production from independent SMEs in the documentary, animation and drama genres as well as multimedia. It will provide grants to independent production companies for the development of single projects. It will support the development of a catalogue of works both for companies with a limited investment capacity and for companies with higher investment capacity.

Distribution : Community action will concentrate its efforts on transnational distribution support, in line with the principle of subsidiarity and as a complementary approach to Member State support mechanisms.

Promotion : the programme will encourage the circulation of European cinematographic works and television programmes within the framework of professional markets within Europe and world-wide.

The budget for implementing this programme is EUR 1 055 million .

For a more detailed assessment of the budgetary implications of this proposal, please refer to the financial statement.

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Hieronymi A6-0278/2005 AM 15 #

2005/10/25 Outcome: +: 408, 0: 32, -: 26
DE FR IT ES GB PL BE NL EL PT CZ LT AT HU DK SK IE FI LU SI MT LV CY EE SE
Total
58
59
42
35
36
35
17
20
17
18
19
11
13
11
12
11
7
7
5
4
4
7
5
3
10
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
173
2

Austria PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE-DE

2

Finland PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Sweden PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
141

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

1

Sweden PSE

Against (1)

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Spain ALDE

1

Netherlands ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
26

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: UEN UEN
13

Lithuania UEN

1

Ireland UEN

1

Latvia UEN

3
icon: NI NI
14

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
24

Germany GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
17

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (2)

2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2004/0955/COM_SEC(2004)0955_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2004/0955/COM_SEC(2004)0955_EN.pdf
docs/2/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:164:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:164:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/3/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:255:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:255:TOC
docs/4/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-350121_EN.html
docs/5
date
2005-07-14T00:00:00
docs
title: PE357.640
committee
AFET
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/5
date
2005-07-11T00:00:00
docs
title: PE355.814
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/5/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-357640_EN.html
docs/6
date
2005-07-14T00:00:00
docs
title: PE357.640
committee
AFET
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/6
date
2005-07-19T00:00:00
docs
title: PE360.158
committee
FEMM
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/6/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-360158_EN.html
docs/7
date
2005-07-19T00:00:00
docs
title: PE360.158
committee
FEMM
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/7
date
2005-07-26T00:00:00
docs
title: PE357.694
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/7/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-357694_EN.html
docs/8
date
2005-07-26T00:00:00
docs
title: PE357.694
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/8
date
2005-08-30T00:00:00
docs
title: PE357.833
committee
ITRE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/8/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-357833_EN.html
docs/9
date
2005-08-30T00:00:00
docs
title: PE357.833
committee
ITRE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/10
date
2005-09-12T00:00:00
docs
title: PE362.412
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/12
date
2006-08-10T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Commission communication on Council's position
body
EC
docs/12/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0450/COM_COM(2006)0450_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0450/COM_COM(2006)0450_EN.pdf
docs/14
date
2006-08-10T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Commission communication on Council's position
body
EC
events/0
date
2004-07-13T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/8
date
2006-07-23T00:00:00
type
Council position published
body
CSL
docs
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=6233%2F06&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 06233/2/2006
summary
events/11
date
2006-10-11T00:00:00
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0337_EN.html title: A6-0337/2006
links/National parliaments/url
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2004&number=0151&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2004&number=0151&appLng=EN
committees/6/rapporteur
  • name: TRAUTMANN Catherine date: 2004-10-07T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/0
date
2004-07-14T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/0
date
2004-07-14T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/1
date
2004-07-14T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/1
date
2005-02-23T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee of the Regions: opinion
body
CofR
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2004/0955/COM_SEC(2004)0955_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2004/0955/COM_SEC(2004)0955_EN.pdf
docs/2
date
2005-02-23T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee of the Regions: opinion
body
CofR
docs/2
date
2005-04-06T00:00:00
docs
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0303)(documentyear:2004)(documentlanguage:EN)
New
https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0303)(documentyear:2004)(documentlanguage:EN)
docs/3
date
2005-04-06T00:00:00
docs
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/3
date
2005-05-13T00:00:00
docs
title: PE350.121
committee
LIBE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0380)(documentyear:2005)(documentlanguage:EN)
New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0380)(documentyear:2005)(documentlanguage:EN)
docs/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE350.121
docs/4
date
2005-05-13T00:00:00
docs
title: PE350.121
committee
LIBE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/5
date
2005-07-14T00:00:00
docs
title: PE357.640
committee
AFET
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE357.640
docs/6
date
2005-07-14T00:00:00
docs
title: PE357.640
committee
AFET
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/6
date
2005-07-19T00:00:00
docs
title: PE360.158
committee
FEMM
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/6/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE360.158
docs/7
date
2005-07-19T00:00:00
docs
title: PE360.158
committee
FEMM
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/7
date
2005-07-26T00:00:00
docs
title: PE357.694
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/7/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE357.694&secondRef=05
docs/8
date
2005-07-26T00:00:00
docs
title: PE357.694
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/8
date
2005-08-30T00:00:00
docs
title: PE357.833
committee
ITRE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/8/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE357.833&secondRef=02
docs/9
date
2005-08-30T00:00:00
docs
title: PE357.833
committee
ITRE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/10
date
2005-09-29T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0278_EN.html title: A6-0278/2005
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/11
date
2005-09-29T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0278_EN.html title: A6-0278/2005
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/11
date
2005-10-25T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/11/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0278_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0278_EN.html
docs/12
date
2005-10-25T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/12
date
2006-07-24T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Council position
body
CSL
docs/12/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0398_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0398_EN.html
docs/12/docs/1/url
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2006:251E:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/13
date
2006-07-24T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Council position
body
CSL
docs/14
date
2006-09-18T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.607 title: PE378.607
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/15
date
2006-09-18T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.607 title: PE378.607
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/15
date
2006-10-11T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0337_EN.html title: A6-0337/2006
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs/15/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.607
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE378.607
docs/16
date
2006-10-11T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0337_EN.html title: A6-0337/2006
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs/16/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0337_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0337_EN.html
docs/17
date
2010-12-20T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/18
date
2010-12-20T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/18/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0777/COM_COM(2010)0777_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0777/COM_COM(2010)0777_EN.pdf
events/0
date
2004-09-15T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/0
date
2004-07-14T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/1
date
2004-09-15T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/2
date
2005-09-12T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
summary
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/3
date
2005-09-12T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
summary
events/3
date
2005-09-29T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0278_EN.html title: A6-0278/2005
events/4
date
2005-10-24T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20051024&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/4
date
2005-09-29T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0278_EN.html title: A6-0278/2005
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20051024&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20051024&type=CRE
events/5
date
2005-10-24T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20051024&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2005-10-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0398_EN.html title: T6-0398/2005
summary
events/6
date
2005-10-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0398_EN.html title: T6-0398/2005
summary
events/8
date
2006-07-24T00:00:00
type
Council position published
body
CSL
docs
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=6233%2F06&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 06233/2/2006
summary
events/10
date
2006-10-24T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061024&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061024&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20061024&type=CRE
events/11
date
2006-10-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0432_EN.html title: T6-0432/2006
summary
The European Parliament adopted the resolution drafted by Ruth HIERONYMI (EPP-ED, DE) and approved the Council's common position.
events/11
date
2006-10-11T00:00:00
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0337_EN.html title: A6-0337/2006
events/11/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0432_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0432_EN.html
events/13
date
2006-10-24T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061024&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/14
date
2006-10-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0432_EN.html title: T6-0432/2006
summary
The European Parliament adopted the resolution drafted by Ruth HIERONYMI (EPP-ED, DE) and approved the Council's common position.
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: HIERONYMI Ruth date: 2006-09-04T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2006-09-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HIERONYMI Ruth group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: HIERONYMI Ruth date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2004-09-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HIERONYMI Ruth group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: PETERLE Alojz date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2004-09-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PETERLE Alojz group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/3
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: DOUAY Brigitte date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/3
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2005-01-31T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DOUAY Brigitte group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/6/date
    committees/7
    type
    Former Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
    committee
    LIBE
    rapporteur
    name: GUARDANS CAMBÓ Ignasi date: 2004-10-05T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
    committees/7
    type
    Former Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
    committee
    LIBE
    date
    2004-10-05T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: GUARDANS CAMBÓ Ignasi group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
    committees/8
    type
    Former Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Women's Rights and Gender Equality
    committee
    FEMM
    rapporteur
    name: PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU Marie date: 2005-06-20T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
    committees/8
    type
    Former Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Women's Rights and Gender Equality
    committee
    FEMM
    date
    2005-06-20T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU Marie group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
    docs/0/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2004/0955/COM_SEC(2004)0955_EN.pdf
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2004/0955/COM_SEC(2004)0955_EN.pdf
    docs/1/docs/1/url
    Old
    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:164:SOM:EN:HTML
    New
    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:164:TOC
    docs/2/docs/1/url
    Old
    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:255:TOC
    New
    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:255:SOM:EN:HTML
    docs/3/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE350.121&secondRef=02
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE350.121
    docs/6/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE360.158&secondRef=02
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE360.158
    docs/10/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-278&language=EN
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0278_EN.html
    docs/11/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-398
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0398_EN.html
    docs/13/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0450/COM_COM(2006)0450_EN.pdf
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0450/COM_COM(2006)0450_EN.pdf
    docs/15/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-337&language=EN
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0337_EN.html
    docs/17/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0777/COM_COM(2010)0777_EN.pdf
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0777/COM_COM(2010)0777_EN.pdf
    events/4/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-278&language=EN
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0278_EN.html
    events/6/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-398
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0398_EN.html
    events/11/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-337&language=EN
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0337_EN.html
    events/14/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-432
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0432_EN.html
    events/17/docs/1/url
    Old
    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2006:327:TOC
    New
    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:327:SOM:EN:HTML
    docs/1/docs/1/url
    Old
    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:164:TOC
    New
    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:164:SOM:EN:HTML
    docs/2/docs/1/url
    Old
    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:255:SOM:EN:HTML
    New
    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:255:TOC
    docs/3/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE350.121
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE350.121&secondRef=02
    docs/5/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE357.640&secondRef=03
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE357.640
    docs/6/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE360.158
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE360.158&secondRef=02
    docs/13/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0450/COM_COM(2006)0450_EN.pdf
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0450/COM_COM(2006)0450_EN.pdf
    events/17/docs/1/url
    Old
    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:327:SOM:EN:HTML
    New
    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2006:327:TOC
    activities
    • date: 2004-07-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0470/COM_COM(2004)0470_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0470 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52004PC0470:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/ title: Education and Culture Commissioner: FIGEĽ Ján type: Legislative proposal published
    • date: 2004-09-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PETERLE Alojz body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: DOUAY Brigitte body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2005-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU Marie body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2004-10-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: GUARDANS CAMBÓ Ignasi
    • body: CSL meeting_id: 2661 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2661*&MEET_DATE=23/05/2005 type: Debate in Council title: 2661 council: Education, Youth, Culture and Sport date: 2005-05-23T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
    • date: 2005-09-12T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PETERLE Alojz body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: DOUAY Brigitte body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2005-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU Marie body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2004-10-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: GUARDANS CAMBÓ Ignasi type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 2005-09-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-278&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0278/2005 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PETERLE Alojz body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: DOUAY Brigitte body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2005-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU Marie body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2004-10-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: GUARDANS CAMBÓ Ignasi type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 2005-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20051024&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2005-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4261&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-398 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0398/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    • body: CSL meeting_id: 2689 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2689*&MEET_DATE=14/11/2005 type: Debate in Council title: 2689 council: Education, Youth, Culture and Sport date: 2005-11-14T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
    • date: 2006-05-18T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Education, Youth, Culture and Sport meeting_id: 2729
    • body: CSL meeting_id: 2747 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=6233%2F06&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Council position published title: 06233/2/2006 council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) date: 2006-07-24T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
    • date: 2006-09-07T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth
    • date: 2006-10-10T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading
    • date: 2006-10-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-337&language=EN type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading title: A6-0337/2006 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
    • date: 2006-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061024&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-432 type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading title: T6-0432/2006 body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2006-11-15T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
    • date: 2006-11-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
    • date: 2006-11-24T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32006D1718 title: Decision 2006/1718 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2006:327:TOC title: OJ L 327 24.11.2006, p. 0012
    commission
    • body: EC dg: Education, Youth, Sport and Culture commissioner: FIGEĽ Ján
    committees/0
    type
    Responsible Committee
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Culture and Education
    committee
    CULT
    date
    2006-09-04T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: HIERONYMI Ruth group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
    committees/0
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee
    AFET
    date
    2004-09-13T00:00:00
    committee_full
    Foreign Affairs
    rapporteur
    group: PPE-DE name: PETERLE Alojz
    committees/1
    type
    Former Responsible Committee
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Culture and Education
    committee
    CULT
    date
    2004-09-22T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: HIERONYMI Ruth group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
    committees/1
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee
    BUDG
    date
    2005-01-31T00:00:00
    committee_full
    Budgets
    rapporteur
    group: PSE name: DOUAY Brigitte
    committees/2
    type
    Former Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Foreign Affairs
    committee
    AFET
    date
    2004-09-13T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: PETERLE Alojz group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
    committees/2
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Budgetary Control
    committee
    CONT
    committees/3
    type
    Former Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Budgets
    committee
    BUDG
    date
    2005-01-31T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: DOUAY Brigitte group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
    committees/3
    body
    EP
    responsible
    True
    committee
    CULT
    date
    2006-09-04T00:00:00
    committee_full
    Culture and Education
    rapporteur
    group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth
    committees/4
    type
    Former Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Budgetary Control
    committee
    CONT
    opinion
    False
    committees/4
    body
    EP
    responsible
    True
    committee
    CULT
    date
    2004-09-22T00:00:00
    committee_full
    Culture and Education
    rapporteur
    group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth
    committees/5
    type
    Former Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Employment and Social Affairs
    committee
    EMPL
    opinion
    False
    committees/5
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Employment and Social Affairs
    committee
    EMPL
    committees/6
    type
    Former Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Industry, Research and Energy
    committee
    ITRE
    date
    committees/6
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee
    FEMM
    date
    2005-06-20T00:00:00
    committee_full
    Women's Rights and Gender Equality
    rapporteur
    group: PPE-DE name: PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU Marie
    committees/7
    type
    Former Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
    committee
    LIBE
    date
    2004-10-05T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: GUARDANS CAMBÓ Ignasi group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
    committees/7
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee_full
    Industry, Research and Energy
    committee
    ITRE
    committees/8
    type
    Former Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Women's Rights and Gender Equality
    committee
    FEMM
    date
    2005-06-20T00:00:00
    rapporteur
    name: PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU Marie group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
    committees/8
    body
    EP
    responsible
    False
    committee
    LIBE
    date
    2004-10-05T00:00:00
    committee_full
    Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
    rapporteur
    group: ALDE name: GUARDANS CAMBÓ Ignasi
    council
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) meeting_id: 2747 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2747*&MEET_DATE=24/07/2006 date: 2006-07-24T00:00:00
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Education, Youth, Culture and Sport meeting_id: 2729 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2729*&MEET_DATE=18/05/2006 date: 2006-05-18T00:00:00
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Education, Youth, Culture and Sport meeting_id: 2689 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2689*&MEET_DATE=14/11/2005 date: 2005-11-14T00:00:00
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Education, Youth, Culture and Sport meeting_id: 2661 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2661*&MEET_DATE=23/05/2005 date: 2005-05-23T00:00:00
    docs
    • date: 2004-07-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2004/0955/COM_SEC(2004)0955_EN.pdf title: SEC(2004)0955 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=955 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
    • date: 2005-02-23T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0303)(documentyear:2004)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CDR0303/2004 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:164:TOC title: OJ C 164 05.07.2005, p. 0076-0077 type: Committee of the Regions: opinion body: CofR
    • date: 2005-04-06T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0380)(documentyear:2005)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES0380/2005 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:255:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 255 14.10.2005, p. 0039-0043 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
    • date: 2005-05-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE350.121 title: PE350.121 committee: LIBE type: Committee opinion body: EP
    • date: 2005-07-11T00:00:00 docs: title: PE355.814 type: Committee draft report body: EP
    • date: 2005-07-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE357.640&secondRef=03 title: PE357.640 committee: AFET type: Committee opinion body: EP
    • date: 2005-07-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE360.158 title: PE360.158 committee: FEMM type: Committee opinion body: EP
    • date: 2005-07-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE357.694&secondRef=05 title: PE357.694 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
    • date: 2005-08-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE357.833&secondRef=02 title: PE357.833 committee: ITRE type: Committee opinion body: EP
    • date: 2005-09-12T00:00:00 docs: title: PE362.412 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
    • date: 2005-09-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-278&language=EN title: A6-0278/2005 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
    • date: 2005-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-398 title: T6-0398/2005 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2006:272E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 272 09.11.2006, p. 0017-0246 E summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Ruth HIERONYMI (EPP-ED, DE) making several amendments to the Commission’s proposal. (Please see the summary of 12/09/2005.) The resolution states that public support to cinema at European, national, regional or local level is essential to overcome the sector’s structural difficulties and allow the European audiovisual industry to meet the challenge of globalisation. Public support schemes should not be open to liberalisation in the framework of international trade negotiations. The resolution also highlights the need for better digital services as well as an end to the chronic under-capitalisation of the European audiovisual sector. Parliament stated that t hroughout the EU one major obstacle to competition is the almost complete lack of companies specialising in providing loan financing in the audiovisual sector. Improved digital services such as European cataloguing are also highlighted as a priority to facilitate access to cinematographic works and overcome fragmentation. The report also makes clear that a ll actions adopted under the programme must be compatible with fundamental rights relating to freedom of expression and media pluralism. Parliament inserted a new paragraph stating that the cooperation of MEDIA Desks in networks, especially proximity networks, must be encouraged in order to facilitate exchange and contacts between professionals, and create public awareness of key events in the programme as well as prizes and awards; the MEDIA Desks play a valuable role as information and service suppliers in facilitating the emergence of new audiovisual centres. The Commission must encourage the setting-up of MEDIA desks and MEDIA antennae in countries and regions with low production capacity and promote their visibility. Furthermore, cooperation between the MEDIA programme and Eurimages needs to be strengthened, but this should not entail integration of financial and administrative matters. The Commission must present an interim evaluation report on the results , on matching the programme to the technological context and its impact on the European market, and on the qualitative and quantitative aspects of implementing the programme , three years after its adoption. The report shall in particular make it possible to assess the effectiveness of structural improvement measures in countries that have recently joined the Union . type: Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
    • date: 2006-07-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=6233%2F06&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 06233/2/2006 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2006:251E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 251 17.10.2006, p. 0001-0019 E summary: The Council’s common position is fully in line with that of the Commission’s initial proposal on the MEDIA 2007 programme. With agreement found on the Financial Framework for 2007-2013 the budget for the programme has been set at EUR 671 million at 2004 prices, taking account of inflation. The Council has also opted to continue with two provisions in the existing MEDIA programme. The first is to continue using an indicative breakdown of resources in Annex to the Decision, broken down as follows: - Acquisition and improvement of skills approximately 7% - Development at least 20% - Distribution at least 55% - Promotion approximately 9% - Pilot projects approximately 4% - Horizontal issues at least 5% The second is to maintain the current practice of using the “management committee procedure” in the following cases: - for training and promotion projects with a total Community contribution of over EUR 200 000 per beneficiary, per year . - for development projects with a total Community contribution of over EUR 200 000 per beneficiary, per year; and - for distribution projects with a total Community contribution of over EUR 300 000 per beneficiary, per year. These thresholds are in line with current practice. Concerning Parliamentary amendments, the Council has accepted most of them, albeit with slight rewording or minor linguistic changes. Taking account of the Interinstitutional Agreement on the Financial Framework 2007 – 2013, the Council decided to reject all amendments concerning the overall budget. The other amendments rejected concern , inter alia ,: - extending positive discrimination measures to Member States with low production capacity and restricted linguistic areas; - reducing the number of broadcasters in different Member States from three to two; - on subtitling; and - on media desks. To conclude, the Council considers its common position to be both balanced and appropriate for the European film industry. It also considers that it has taken account of the Parliament’s and the Commission’s concerns. type: Council position body: CSL
    • date: 2006-08-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0450/COM_COM(2006)0450_EN.pdf title: COM(2006)0450 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=450 title: EUR-Lex summary: The Commission notes that the Council reached agreement on this proposal through unanimity. Since the Common Position, in essence, accepts most of the amendments proposed by Parliament and given that the Common Position is in line with the Commission’s original vision of the proposed Decision, the Commission has decided to accept the Council’s conclusions. Certain minor changes have been introduced by the Council; two of which are substantive. The first substantive change refers to the comitology procedure, whereby the Committee arrangements implemented under the current MEDIA programme will continue. The second change refers to the revised budget, which now stands at EUR 671 million and which is the result of agreement found for the Financial Perspectives (2007-2013). The inclusion of an indicative breakdown in the Annex is in line with the existing Decision governing the MEDIA programme. type: Commission communication on Council's position body: EC
    • date: 2006-09-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.607 title: PE378.607 type: Committee draft report body: EP
    • date: 2006-10-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-337&language=EN title: A6-0337/2006 type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading body: EP
    • date: 2006-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=3653%2F06&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 03653/2006 type: Draft final act body: CSL
    • date: 2010-12-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0777/COM_COM(2010)0777_EN.pdf title: COM(2010)0777 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2010&nu_doc=777 title: EUR-Lex summary: The aim of this report is to provide an interim evaluation of the MEDIA 2007 programme in accordance with Decision No 1718/2006/EC (MEDIA 2007). The Decision also requires that evaluation of the EU’s participation in the European Audiovisual Observatory be carried out within the framework of monitoring and evaluation of the MEDIA programme. The report sets out the main results obtained over the past three years of implementation and the recommendations for possible adjustments. It covers the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2009 and is based on the conclusions of the interim evaluation by an external consulting group. The report notes that over 5 000 projects were supported by MEDIA 2007 over the first three years of implementation. European co-financing for these projects amounts to around EUR 296 million, i.e. 39% of the programme budget over the entire period. More than 3 000 organisations applied for support from the MEDIA 2007 programme over the first three years (compared with less than 2 000 over the entire MEDIA Plus programme period) and more than 1 400 organisations were selected. The number of applications for support from organisations in the new Member States increased slightly under the MEDIA 2007 programme. The organisations selected by MEDIA 2007 are producers (56%), distributors (31%) and promoters (11%). They are usually very small companies (66% have a turnover of less than EUR 1.5 million, 80% have a turnover of less than EUR 4 million). Beneficiaries of MEDIA 2007 are located all over Europe (98 out of 105 regions). The five largest countries (Germany, Spain, France, Italy, and United Kingdom) receive almost two thirds of the amounts committed by MEDIA, in proportion to the relative importance of these markets in Europe. The ten other EU-15 countries together with Switzerland, Iceland and Norway receive on average 25% of the amounts committed, but this share is diminishing. The share of the "new" Member States is stable, at around 8%. Conclusions of the evaluation : MEDIA 2007 is well equipped to meet the sector's needs because, among other things, it is internally coherent, is firmly grounded in the European audiovisual scene and is designed to support change in the sector. In the vast majority of cases, MEDIA is considered to be complementary to existing national provisions, as it supports work which receives little or no national subsidisation. It also offers significant added value due to the strong European dimension which it gives to the projects it supports, and also allows them to be more ambitious. Lastly, the programme seems to inspire national policies. A certain number of developments have been noted in various countries. For instance, new legislative provisions are in the drafting stage or have just entered into force in Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Norway and Slovenia. However, the evaluator identified avenues for improving certain lines of action: support for interactive works could become more effective, in particular through achieving greater clarity as to their target audiences; support from MEDIA 2007 for TV distribution is important because it responds to a pronounced sectoral need. It makes a significant contribution to securing producers' rights in some countries. However, its effectiveness is impaired by a number of factors: discrepancy between the type of works supported and the programming needs of European channels; contradiction between the required large number of broadcasters and the existence of a minimum guarantee provided by a distributor; discrepancy between developments in market prices and the investments required by MEDIA; imbalances in the geographical distribution of support. Furthermore, the effect of certain actions remains marginal for reasons external to the programme and linked to the market in which they are taken: i2i support helps to effectively reduce financial costs, but it is not wide-ranging enough to generate visible effects in terms of access to financing; support for video-on-demand (VOD) does not yet sufficiently foster the circulation of European works as the market remains very weak; as regards the objectives of preserving and promoting cultural diversity and the positive discrimination mechanisms mentioned in point 6.2, the restricted scope of the programme does not allow for a significant impact in terms of reducing the disparities between countries with low and high audiovisual production capacities. While the allocations to organisations from the "new" Member States are increasing, the budget share remains the same (around 8%). The average budget per organisation in these countries is therefore progressively decreasing. Position of the Commission : although the interim evaluation of the MEDIA 2007 programme was conducted at an early stage in implementation, it confirms the positive results of the programme actions in favour of the European audiovisual sector. It reaffirms the relevance of its objectives and the effectiveness of its actions, particularly as regards making the sector more competitive. Furthermore, it confirms the added value it brings to national interventions. The market data also indicate that the European audiovisual sector continues to suffer from its traditional weaknesses , namely market fragmentation and the poor circulation of European works outside their country of origin. Action should therefore continue to be taken in line with changes in market needs. The Commission will make adjustments to the MEDIA 2007 programme for the remaining period in order to improve its efficiency and effectiveness and ensure it is better adapted to market needs, within the limits of the existing legal basis, and in line with the evaluator's recommendations. Other adjustments are being developed and will be in place for the second half of the programme's implementation period. These will be examined in the next Communication on the continuation of the programme. Furthermore, the Commission will integrate the more long-term strategic recommendations made by the evaluator into the preparation of the next programme, to be launched in 2013. Lines of action will be examined as part of the impact study to be carried out in preparation for this programme. type: Follow-up document body: EC
    events
    • date: 2004-07-14T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0470/COM_COM(2004)0470_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0470 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=470 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to establish a programme for the European audiovisual sector (MEDIA 2007.) PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council. CONTENT: this proposal comes about due to the Commission's assessment that the European audiovisual sector is fragmented in terms of both its production structure and the cultural framework in which it operates. Whilst it is clear that this fragmentation has resulted in a culturally diverse and highly independent production industry, providing a voice for the different cultural traditions that make up our European heritage, it has, however, prevented European industry from achieving a larger market share with respect to non- European imports both within the Union and worldwide. The European audiovisual industry struggles to match the high competitiveness of its American counterpart. New Community action for the audiovisual industry should contribute to translating European cultural values into a competitive worldwide industry, by overcoming the obstacles that prevent operators from benefiting from the advantages of the Internal Market for non-national audiovisual productions. A more competitive audiovisual industry will have positive effects on growth and employment for the whole Union and will consolidate the European cultural values at the basis of European citizenship. The new programme will focus on supporting the creative process at all levels of the production chain with the objective of enabling the sector to fully exploit the economic and cultural potential of the European Internal Market. Community action will therefore be integrated into a single programme intervening in the pre-production and in the post production phases in line with the principle of subsidiarity. MEDIA 2007 will have as global objectives, to: 1) Preserve and enhance European cultural diversity and its cinematographic and audiovisual heritage, guarantee its accessibility for European citizens and promote intercultural dialogue; 2) Increase the circulation of European audiovisual works inside and outside the European Union; 3) Strengthen the competitiveness of the European audiovisual sector in the framework of an open and competitive market. The programme will take into account four horizontal priorities: - the importance of the creative process within the European audiovisual sector and the cultural value of Europe's cinematographic and audiovisual heritage need to be integrated within the actions proposed. - strengthening of the production structures of the SMEs, which constitute the core of the European audiovisual sector, as a means of enhancing its competitiveness. This will mean contributing to the spread of a business culture for the sector and facilitating private investments in the sector. - the programme will reduce the imbalances between countries with a high production capacity and countries with low production capacity or a restricted linguistic area. This priority responds to the need to preserve and enhance cultural diversity and inter-cultural dialogue in Europe. - the programme will follow and support market developments with regard to digitisation. The programme will put in place measures to accompany the changes that digitisation is producing in the audiovisual sector at all stages of the production and distribution chain as well as in terms of new competencies for the professionals of the sector. With regard to specific objectives: Acquisition and improvement of skills in the audiovisual sector : the programme will support projects aiming at improving the creative and management skills of European audiovisual professionals as well as adapting their technical skills to digital technologies. Development : the programme will support the development phase of production from independent SMEs in the documentary, animation and drama genres as well as multimedia. It will provide grants to independent production companies for the development of single projects. It will support the development of a catalogue of works both for companies with a limited investment capacity and for companies with higher investment capacity. Distribution : Community action will concentrate its efforts on transnational distribution support, in line with the principle of subsidiarity and as a complementary approach to Member State support mechanisms. Promotion : the programme will encourage the circulation of European cinematographic works and television programmes within the framework of professional markets within Europe and world-wide. The budget for implementing this programme is EUR 1 055 million . For a more detailed assessment of the budgetary implications of this proposal, please refer to the financial statement.
    • date: 2004-09-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
    • date: 2005-05-23T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2661*&MEET_DATE=23/05/2005 title: 2661 summary: Pending the European Parliament’s opinion, the Council issued an overall partial guideline on the MEDIA 2007 programme. The aim being to lay down the Council’s position on the actions which should be supported by the Community in the framework programme. The “partial” nature of this guideline is due to the fact that the budget aspects have still to be discussed. These will not be known until the definition of the future financial perspectives 2007-2013.
    • date: 2005-09-12T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the report by Ruth HIERONYMI ( EPP-ED , DE ) amending the proposal under the 1st reading of the codecision procedure: - the programme's general objectives should include preserving and enhancing European linguistic diversity, strengthening the competitiveness of the European audiovisual sector on international markets as well as European markets, strengthening the financing structure of the sector, especially for SMEs, developing the digitisation of the sector and improving the marketing of European audiovisual works; - the specific objectives should include encouraging the use of subtitling "as a less costly support to the distribution and diffusion of European films outside their national borders" and improving the European and international public's access to Europe 's cinematographic and audiovisual heritage; - as regards participation by third countries, the committee felt that European countries covered by the European Neighbourhood Policy should be able to benefit from cooperation with the programme if additional finances become available; - the Commission should "adhere to the proportionality principle" in connection with eligibility criteria and the documents to be supplied and filled in; - greater support should be given to cross-border projects and co-productions; - independent producers should receive particular encouragement and support; - the programme's contribution to other EU policies should include promoting media pluralism and independence and promoting equality between women and men; - the Commission should ensure that the actions under the programme are subjected to prior evaluation, monitoring and ex-post evaluation. Lastly, MEPs wanted to see innovative distribution platforms, more European film festivals and the establishment of a Pier Paolo Pasolini Prize for New Talents.
    • date: 2005-09-29T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-278&language=EN title: A6-0278/2005
    • date: 2005-10-24T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20051024&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2005-10-25T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-398 title: T6-0398/2005 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Ruth HIERONYMI (EPP-ED, DE) making several amendments to the Commission’s proposal. (Please see the summary of 12/09/2005.) The resolution states that public support to cinema at European, national, regional or local level is essential to overcome the sector’s structural difficulties and allow the European audiovisual industry to meet the challenge of globalisation. Public support schemes should not be open to liberalisation in the framework of international trade negotiations. The resolution also highlights the need for better digital services as well as an end to the chronic under-capitalisation of the European audiovisual sector. Parliament stated that t hroughout the EU one major obstacle to competition is the almost complete lack of companies specialising in providing loan financing in the audiovisual sector. Improved digital services such as European cataloguing are also highlighted as a priority to facilitate access to cinematographic works and overcome fragmentation. The report also makes clear that a ll actions adopted under the programme must be compatible with fundamental rights relating to freedom of expression and media pluralism. Parliament inserted a new paragraph stating that the cooperation of MEDIA Desks in networks, especially proximity networks, must be encouraged in order to facilitate exchange and contacts between professionals, and create public awareness of key events in the programme as well as prizes and awards; the MEDIA Desks play a valuable role as information and service suppliers in facilitating the emergence of new audiovisual centres. The Commission must encourage the setting-up of MEDIA desks and MEDIA antennae in countries and regions with low production capacity and promote their visibility. Furthermore, cooperation between the MEDIA programme and Eurimages needs to be strengthened, but this should not entail integration of financial and administrative matters. The Commission must present an interim evaluation report on the results , on matching the programme to the technological context and its impact on the European market, and on the qualitative and quantitative aspects of implementing the programme , three years after its adoption. The report shall in particular make it possible to assess the effectiveness of structural improvement measures in countries that have recently joined the Union .
    • date: 2005-11-14T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2689*&MEET_DATE=14/11/2005 title: 2689 summary: The Council reached a partial political agreement on a decision establishing the Media 2007 programme, which is aimed at providing financial support for the European audiovisual sector for the 2007-2013 period. The "partial" nature of this agreement is due to the fact that the budgetary aspects have been excluded pending the outcome of the discussions on the future Community financial framework (Financial Perspective 2007/2013). It is therefore expected that this item will return to the (Education, Youth and Culture) Council's agenda at some future date in order to finalise the budget and its final breakdown aspects.
    • date: 2006-07-24T00:00:00 type: Council position published body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=6233%2F06&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 06233/2/2006 summary: The Council’s common position is fully in line with that of the Commission’s initial proposal on the MEDIA 2007 programme. With agreement found on the Financial Framework for 2007-2013 the budget for the programme has been set at EUR 671 million at 2004 prices, taking account of inflation. The Council has also opted to continue with two provisions in the existing MEDIA programme. The first is to continue using an indicative breakdown of resources in Annex to the Decision, broken down as follows: - Acquisition and improvement of skills approximately 7% - Development at least 20% - Distribution at least 55% - Promotion approximately 9% - Pilot projects approximately 4% - Horizontal issues at least 5% The second is to maintain the current practice of using the “management committee procedure” in the following cases: - for training and promotion projects with a total Community contribution of over EUR 200 000 per beneficiary, per year . - for development projects with a total Community contribution of over EUR 200 000 per beneficiary, per year; and - for distribution projects with a total Community contribution of over EUR 300 000 per beneficiary, per year. These thresholds are in line with current practice. Concerning Parliamentary amendments, the Council has accepted most of them, albeit with slight rewording or minor linguistic changes. Taking account of the Interinstitutional Agreement on the Financial Framework 2007 – 2013, the Council decided to reject all amendments concerning the overall budget. The other amendments rejected concern , inter alia ,: - extending positive discrimination measures to Member States with low production capacity and restricted linguistic areas; - reducing the number of broadcasters in different Member States from three to two; - on subtitling; and - on media desks. To conclude, the Council considers its common position to be both balanced and appropriate for the European film industry. It also considers that it has taken account of the Parliament’s and the Commission’s concerns.
    • date: 2006-09-07T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP
    • date: 2006-10-10T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the report by Ruth HIERONYMI (EPP-ED, DE) approving the Council's common position unamended under the 2nd reading of the codecision procedure.
    • date: 2006-10-11T00:00:00 type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-337&language=EN title: A6-0337/2006
    • date: 2006-10-24T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=12708&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2006-10-24T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061024&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2006-10-24T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-432 title: T6-0432/2006 summary: The European Parliament adopted the resolution drafted by Ruth HIERONYMI (EPP-ED, DE) and approved the Council's common position.
    • date: 2006-11-15T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL
    • date: 2006-11-15T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    • date: 2006-11-24T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to implement the MEDIA 2007 programme. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision No 1718/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the implementation of a programme of support for the European audiovisual sector (MEDIA 2007). CONTENT: this Decision establishes a support programme for the European audiovisual sector, referred to as MEDIA 2007. It covers the period 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013. The programme is intended to strengthen the audiovisual sector economically thereby enabling it to play a more effective cultural role. The global objectives of the programme are: a) to preserve and enhance European cultural and linguistic diversity as well as Europe ’s cinematographic and audiovisual heritage and to guarantee its accessibility to the public; b) to increase the circulation and viewing of European audiovisual works inside and outside of the European Union; c) to strengthen the competitiveness of the European audiovisual sector within an open and competitive framework and to promote links between audiovisual professionals. In order to achieve these objectives the programme will support the following actions: a) the acquisition and improvement of skills in the audiovisual field and the development of European audiovisual works; b) the distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works; c) pilot projects to ensure that the programme adjusts to market developments. Intervention priorities are as follows: a) fostering creativity in the audiovisual sector as well as disseminating Europe ’s cinematographic and audiovisual heritage; b) strengthening the European audiovisual sector – particularly for SME’s; c) reducing country-wide imbalances in production capacity; d) supporting market development vis-à-vis digitisation – including the promotion of attractive digital catalogues of European films on digital platforms. As far as the financial envelope is concerned the programme will benefit from a budget of € 754 950 000. The indicative breakdown of the amount is set out in Annex to the Decision. Any legal and natural persons can benefit from MEDIA 2007 with the Commission deciding, who may be exempted from verification of the professional skills and qualifications required. The Commission will also be responsible for taking account of the type of activity supported, the specific profile of the target public from the audiovisual sector and the objectives of the programme. The financial aid awarded under the terms of the programme may not exceed 50% of the final costs of the operation supported. However, in cases expressly provided for in the Annex, financial aid may be as high as 75%. Any such aid will be granted whilst ensuring that award procedures are both transparent and objective. The Commission will be responsible for ensuring that the actions covered are subject to prior evaluation, monitoring and ex-post evaluation. The results of the process of monitoring and evaluation will be taken into account during the implementation phase. The Commission will need to ensure that the programme is evaluated regularly, externally and independently. The Commission will present to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: a) an interim evaluation report on the results and the qualitative and quantitative aspects of implementing the programme no later than three years after the start of the programme; b) a communication on the continuation of the programme no later than four years after the start of the programme; c) a detailed ex-post evaluation report by 31 December 2015 covering the implementation and results of the programme on completion of its implementation. The Commission will publish and disseminate via the MEDIA Desks any relevant statistics and analyses. ENTRY INTO FROCE: 25 November 2006. APPLICATION: 1 January 2007. docs: title: Decision 2006/1718 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32006D1718 title: OJ L 327 24.11.2006, p. 0012 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:327:SOM:EN:HTML
    other
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/ title: Education and Culture commissioner: FIGEĽ Ján
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    CULT/6/39835
    New
    • CULT/6/39835
    procedure/final/url
    Old
    http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32006D1718
    New
    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32006D1718
    procedure/instrument
    Old
    Decision
    New
    • Decision
    • Repealed by 2011/0370(COD)
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 3.30.01.02 Programmes and actions in audiovisual sector
    New
    3.30.01.02
    Programmes and actions in audiovisual sector
    procedure/summary
    • Repealed by
    activities/16/docs/1/url
    Old
    http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:327:SOM:EN:HTML
    New
    http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2006:327:TOC
    links/European Commission/title
    Old
    PreLex
    New
    EUR-Lex
    activities
    • date: 2004-07-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0470/COM_COM(2004)0470_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52004PC0470:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2004)0470 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/ title: Education and Culture Commissioner: FIGEĽ Ján
    • date: 2004-09-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PETERLE Alojz body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: DOUAY Brigitte body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2005-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU Marie body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2004-10-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: GUARDANS CAMBÓ Ignasi
    • body: CSL meeting_id: 2661 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2661*&MEET_DATE=23/05/2005 type: Debate in Council title: 2661 council: Education, Youth, Culture and Sport date: 2005-05-23T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
    • date: 2005-09-12T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PETERLE Alojz body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: DOUAY Brigitte body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2005-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU Marie body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2004-10-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: GUARDANS CAMBÓ Ignasi type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 2005-09-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-278&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0278/2005 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PETERLE Alojz body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: DOUAY Brigitte body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2005-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU Marie body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2004-10-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: GUARDANS CAMBÓ Ignasi type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 2005-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20051024&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2005-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4261&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-398 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0398/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    • body: CSL meeting_id: 2689 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2689*&MEET_DATE=14/11/2005 type: Debate in Council title: 2689 council: Education, Youth, Culture and Sport date: 2005-11-14T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
    • date: 2006-05-18T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Education, Youth, Culture and Sport meeting_id: 2729
    • body: CSL meeting_id: 2747 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=6233%2F06&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Council position published title: 06233/2/2006 council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) date: 2006-07-24T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
    • date: 2006-09-07T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth
    • date: 2006-10-10T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading
    • date: 2006-10-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-337&language=EN type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading title: A6-0337/2006 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
    • date: 2006-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061024&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-432 type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading title: T6-0432/2006 body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2006-11-15T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
    • date: 2006-11-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
    • date: 2006-11-24T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32006D1718 title: Decision 2006/1718 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:327:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ L 327 24.11.2006, p. 0012
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PETERLE Alojz
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: DOUAY Brigitte
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2006-09-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HIERONYMI Ruth
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2005-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU Marie
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2004-10-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: GUARDANS CAMBÓ Ignasi
    links
    National parliaments
    European Commission
    other
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/ title: Education and Culture commissioner: FIGEĽ Ján
    procedure
    dossier_of_the_committee
    CULT/6/39835
    reference
    2004/0151(COD)
    instrument
    Decision
    legal_basis
    stage_reached
    Procedure completed
    summary
    Repealed by
    subtype
    Legislation
    title
    Audiovisual sector: implementation of a programme of support for this European sector, MEDIA 2007
    type
    COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
    final
    subject
    3.30.01.02 Programmes and actions in audiovisual sector