BETA


2004/0156(COD) Satellite navigation programmes EGNOS and Galileo: implementation of the deployment and commercial operating phases 2008-2013. GNSS Regulation

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ITRE BARSI-PATAKY Etelka (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Former Responsible Committee ITRE BARSI-PATAKY Etelka (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion CONT
Committee Opinion TRAN JENSEN Anne E. (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion BUDG SCHINAS Margaritis (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Former Committee Opinion TRAN LOUIS Patrick (icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM)
Former Committee Opinion CONT
Former Committee Opinion BUDG LEWANDOWSKI Janusz (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 156

Events

2011/01/12
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 683/2008, the Commission presents a report constituting the annual report and mid-term review of the European satellite radio navigation programmes . It takes stock of the progress made on the programmes and sets out the challenges ahead.

1) The development of programmes since 2007: when the Commission took over responsibility for managing the Galileo and EGNOS programmes in 2008, they were experiencing significant cost overruns and delays, as well as serious governance problems. Significant progress has been made over the last three years: the EGNOS open service officially became operational on 1 October 2009. The system has operated since then in accordance with the requisite specifications. It is operated by a service provider (hereinafter 'ESSP') under contract to the Commission. The main subject of the contract is the uninterrupted provision of the open service and of the safety-of-life ('SoL') service.

A milestone was reached in July 2010 with the certification of ESSP under the regulations governing the single European sky. The period for finalising the EGNOS system should be completed in the near future and the SoL service for the needs of civil aviation should be declared open in early 2011. In addition, it is planned to extend the area covered by EGNOS services gradually to include all the countries belonging to the European Civil Aviation Conference. Studies are also continuing into extending coverage into Africa, the Arab countries and the countries immediately to the east of the EU.

Where the development phase is concerned, the two experimental satellites, Giove A and Giove B, are operating very satisfactorily. In addition, the assembly of the first four satellites in the future constellation, which will be launched in 2011-2012, as ESA has confirmed, is currently being completed.

Work on the deployment phase was launched in 2008 and is proceeding actively. This work has been divided up essentially into six packages, each of which is the subject of a public procurement procedure. Competitive dialogue with the tendering firms is a key element in the procedures which have been launched.

As a result, the first four contracts, with a total value of around EUR 1 250 million , were awarded in 2010; they are for the packages covering system engineering support, satellite construction ( with an initial order for 14 satellites ), launchers (for the launch of 10 satellites, but with options for additional launches) and operations, respectively. The other two packages, relating to ground infrastructure, will be awarded in 2011. The contracts for additional equipment and facilities will also need to be awarded in the course of 2011. For those contracts where there was competitive supply, savings have been possible with respect to original estimates, whereas this was not the case in monopoly situations.

Horizontal measures: the report discusses several horizontal measures flanking the deployment of the infrastructure, which have been taken on the regulatory front, with regard to international aspects and in respect of future uses. These include the compatibility and interoperability of the systems , which are the focus of complex discussions with China, the United States, Russia, India and Japan, and also within the United Nations. Where the development of downstream markets is concerned, in June 2010, the Commission adopted a GNSS Applications Action Plan to promote the use of satellite radio navigation in what it considers to be priority fields.

2) New challenges: However, the programmes are now faced with fresh challenges arising from the materialisation of a number of risks which were previously identified by the Commission, and the organisation of the programmes must be further fine-tuned in order to increase their efficiency.

The project has experienced cost overruns attributable in particular to the increased cost of the development phase, the increased price of the launchers, the lack of competition for the award of some packages and additional costs associated with the programme. The report notes that the additional cost of the development phase amounts to some EUR 500 million in total. The price of launch services has entailed an additional cost of more than EUR 500 million by comparison with the original budget.

The assessment shows that average annual operating costs amount to some EUR 800 million at 2010 prices, not adjusted for inflation, of which EUR 110 million is accounted for by EGNOS.

The estimates made to date point to a requirement for around EUR 1 900 million in funding over the period 2014-2019 to complete the infrastructure associated with the Galileo programme. Added to this will be the operating costs of the system once it has become operational, i.e. as from 2014-2015.

Furthermore, the economic situation of the EU and its Member States has led the Commission not to seek, up to now, the allocation of additional resources within the current multiannual financial framework, even though this is causing delays in completion of the full deployment of Galileo and an increase in overall costs.

A new basis for the work on the European satellite radio navigation programmes needs to be established so that progress can continue without compromising the objectives laid down by the European Parliament and Council. Accordingly, the Commission recommends an approach which envisages the present organisation being maintained and improved over at least 10 years, although it will have to evolve in line with the needs of the exploitation phase.

On the political front , several decisions still need to be taken. In a context in which Europe's economic and social progress is heavily dependent on mastering and using leading-edge technologies such as those relating to nuclear fusion, space, air traffic management and life sciences, it is important to reach decisions about the means, including budgetary means, of coping with the risks inherent in such technologies. Conclusions also need to be reached on the development of the EU budget and on how the risks are to be apportioned between the EU and its Member States. The decisions laying down the budgetary and financial principles governing the continuation of the European satellite radio navigation programmes will need to be taken in parallel with those concerning the governance framework. This must seek to make all the players more aware of their responsibilities, in order to ensure an orderly transition to future governance arrangements while at the same time enhancing control of the project and of its associated costs.

The adoption of such political decisions requires time and thought. Detailed proposals will be drawn up by the Commission at a later stage on the basis of the guidelines to be laid down by the European Parliament and the Council in the light of this report.

2009/06/26
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The Commission presents the First Annual Report on the implementation of GNSS Regulation (Galileo and EGNOS) in accordance with Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 on the further implementation of the European satellite radio navigation programmes and with reference to the GNSS work programme adopted in 2008.

The GNSS Regulation re-profiles the European GNSS programmes by establishing a legal and financial framework for the 2008-2013 period. It was adopted by the European Parliament and Council on a proposal that the European Commission presented in September 2007, following the decision to end the negotiations for the conclusion of a concession contract with the private sector in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 876/2002, and in line with the Council’s Conclusions of November 2007 on the need to restructure the European Global Navigation Satellite System Programmes.

The report highlights the status of implementation of some important decisions that were taken in 2008 in close cooperation between the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council. The Commission will seek to ensure close involvement of the other institutions, as appropriate. Their continued support for the further implementation of the programmes, in line with a shared commitment, is key to the success of the programmes.

Legal framework : the GNSS Regulation provides the legal and financial framework for the deployment of the Programmes and defines a governance structure with new roles for the various organisations involved, based on two main principles: (i) a strict division of responsibilities between the European Commission, the European Space Agency and the GNSS Supervisory Authority, set up by Council Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 on the establishment of structures for the management of the European satellite radio-navigation programmes (GSA Regulation) with the Commission having the overall responsibility for the management of the programme, including the security related aspects; (ii) the complete financing of the Galileo deployment phase (Full Operational Capability - FOC) from 2008 to 2013 by the Community budget.

Main milestones : in its new role as programme manager, the Commission has launched important initiatives to reach the milestones needed for the further achievement of the objectives of the programmes and it has successfully achieved these milestones. By doing so the Commission has ensured that the necessary framework is in place in order to move on with the next steps in the implementation of the programmes.

For EGNOS this means that the Commission has ensured a smooth continuation of operations after the hand-over of the system by the European Space Agency (ESA) to the Commission on 1 April 2009 by taking over the ownership, on behalf of the Community, of the EGNOS system, from ESA (by arrangements with ESA and the EOIG, the EGNOS Operators and Infrastructure Group):

an operations contract with ESSP SaS (EGNOS Satellite Services Provider) that will guarantee operations until October 2009, after which a long-term contract covering the period until 2013 will be put in place; agreeing with ESA that it will take on tasks for the design and procurement of EGNOS equipment and software renewals; establishing the main management interfaces in the management and execution of the EGNOS programme activities subject to the Delegation Agreement, in a Programme Management Plan developed with ESA; contracting out the supply of a special satellite navigation transponder on a new geostationary satellite.

Furthermore, while a short-term contract with an operator for the EGNOS service has been in place from that date, further work needs to be done to come to a more permanent solution by autumn 2009 and also to achieve certification of EGNOS for aviation. This should be concluded by the first quarter of 2010, taking into account the requirements of the Single European Sky regulation. Equally, compliance with the performance requirements of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) will need to be ensured. As referred to in the Work Programme 2009, significant marketing activities will have to be deployed for EGNOS to facilitate its acceptance and use by the aviation sector and other areas such as road, rail, maritime and agriculture.

For GALILEO it means that the Commission has taken all steps necessary for the procurement of the Galileo system, and has:

delegated to ESA the task of procuring the Galileo infrastructure, in accordance with the GNSS regulation and the EU procurement rules (Delegation Agreement signed on 19 December 2008); established the main management interfaces in the management and execution of the Galileo programme activities subject to the Delegation Agreement, in a Programme Management Plan developed with ESA; launched the competitive tendering procedure for the procurement of the Galileo infrastructure , divided into six work packages, in July 2008; provided to ESA, by means of a grant agreement, the funds necessary to cover the cost overruns incurred by ESA during the In-Orbit Validation phase (IOV).

Main challenges in 2009 : the focus of activities in 2009 will be on concluding the FOC procurement, signing the service contract for EGNOS, launching preparatory studies for the post-2013 phase of Galileo and publishing the Galileo applications action plan. Further key activities in 2009 will be the revision of the GSA Regulation, the revision of the international cooperation strategy and a range of general measures, including risk management, technical consultancy and communications. Many of these activities are crucial for both Galileo and EGNOS, and challenges in certain areas such as IOV cost overruns and FOC procurement, therefore need to be prepared for.

Work on full EGNOS coverage in Europe, and on an extension beyond European territory, notably into Africa, also remains an important activity in 2009.

The main challenge for the international activities of the GNSS Programmes in 2009 will be to ensure the compatibility and interoperability with Galileo, to access global GNSS-related resources and set worldwide standards, to ensure security of the space segment and network of ground stations, while ensuring a stricter control of sensitive GNSS technologies developed with European funding, to join in an international effort to develop innovative applications and specialised applications of supra-regional interest. An important objective will be to create market opportunities for the European GNSS technology and applications industries.

Cooperation with China will undergo a major test at the next steering committee, jointly set as a key milestone to assess the progress made in the 2008/2009 timeframe on the critical issue of COMPASS/Galileo compatibility. The European side expects positive reactions on the proposals made by the experts. If the problem is not solved promptly, it cannot be excluded that the cooperation with China will get a major reshaping.

Funding : Community funding will furthermore cover activities relating to the completion of the Galileo IOV phase as well as the cost for operating EGNOS and preparatory activities in relation to the exploitation of the programmes. The total amount earmarked for these activities is EUR 3405 million, including EUR 400 million made available from the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development, the EU's main instrument for funding research in Europe for the period 2007-2013.

If appropriate, the Commission will, in accordance with the Regulation, pre pare and present, in 2010, a proposal covering the public funds and commitments needed for the financing programming period starting in 2014 , and will present scenarios for the exploitation of the Galileo system.

2008/07/24
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to lay down the rules for the further implementation of the EGNOS and GALILEO programmes, including those on governance and the financial contribution of the Community.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the further implementation of the European satellite navigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo).

CONTENT: this Regulation describes the further implementation of the Community’s two satellite navigation systems, established under the EGNOS and Galileo programmes. Each infrastructure is made up of satellites and a network of earth stations.

Galileo : the aim of the Galileo programme is to establish the first global satellite navigation and positioning infrastructure specifically designed for civilian purposes. The system established under the Galileo programme is completely independent of other existing or potential systems.

The phases of the Galileo programme : these are the following :

(a) a definition phase during which the structure of the system was designed and its elements determined, which ended in 2001;

(b) a development and validation phase, comprising the construction and launch of the first satellites, the establishment of the first ground-based infrastructures and all the work and operations necessary to validate the system in orbit. The aim is that this phase shall end in 2010;

(c) a deployment phase consisting of the establishment of all the space and ground-based infrastructures as well as related operations. The aim is that this phase shall run from 2008 to 2013. It shall include preparations for the exploitation phase;

(d) an exploitation phase comprising infrastructure management, the maintenance, constant improvement and renewal of the system, certification and standardisation operations relating to the programme, the marketing of the system and all other activities needed to develop the system and ensure that the programme runs smoothly. The exploitation phase is set to begin at the latest upon conclusion of the deployment phase.

Financing the Galileo programme : the definition phase and the development and validation phase of the Galileo programme, which are the phases of the programme dedicated to research, have been financed substantially by the Community budget for trans-European networks and by the European Space Agency (ESA). The deployment phase should, in principle, be financed entirely by the Community . It may be decided at a later stage that public-private partnerships or any other form of contract with private sector entities are appropriate for the operation, maintenance, improvement and renewal of the system after 2013. In 2010, the Commission shall submit, together with its mid-term review, a proposal concerning the public funds and commitments required for the financing programming period starting in 2014 , also covering any financial obligations with regard to the exploitation phase deriving from its responsibility relating to the public ownership of the system, the revenue-sharing mechanism for the exploitation phase, and objectives for a pricing policy ensuring that customers receive high quality services at fair prices. It shall, in particular, include a reasoned feasibility study of the advantages and disadvantages of the use of service concession contracts or public service contracts with private sector entities.

Member States may provide additional funding to the Galileo programme to cover the investment necessary for the evolution to the agreed system architecture in particular cases. Third countries and international organisations may also provide additional funding to the Galileo programme.

EGNOS : the aim of the EGNOS programme is to improve the quality of signals from existing global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). The operation of the EGNOS system shall consist primarily of infrastructure management, maintenance, constant improvement and renewal of the system, certification and standardisation operations relating to the programme, and marketing.

Financing the operation of the EGNOS system : the Community shall finance the operation of EGNOS, without prejudice to any contribution from any other source. The operation of EGNOS will initially be the subject of one or more public service contracts. Member States may provide additional funding to the EGNOS programme. Third countries and international organisations may also provide additional funding to the EGNOS programme.

Budgetary resources : The European Parliament and the Council have decided that the total estimated operating costs for the Galileo and EGNOS systems for the period 2007-2013 are EUR 3405 million . EUR 1005 million had originally been earmarked in the multiannual financial framework (2007 to 2013). This amount has been increased by EUR 2000 million. Furthermore, EUR 400 million has been made available through the Seventh Framework Programme (2007 to 2013), thus bringing the total available budget to EUR 3405 million for the programmes for the period 2007-2013.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 25/07/2008.

2008/07/09
   CSL - Draft final act
Documents
2008/07/09
   CSL - Final act signed
2008/07/09
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2008/07/03
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
2008/05/28
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/04/23
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2008/04/23
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted, with 607 votes to 36 against with 6 abstentions, a legislative resolution making some amendments to the amended proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the further implementation of the European satellite radio-navigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo). The report was tabled for consideration in plenary by Etelka BARSI-PATAKY (EPP-ED, HU), on behalf of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy. The text adopted was the result of a compromise negotiated with the Council in informal meetings. The amended regulation contains several modifications requested by Parliament and asks the European Commission to lay down the main technical requirements for controlling access to the technologies that provide security to Galileo and EGNOS.

The main amendments - adopted in the 1 st reading of the codecision procedure - are as follows:

Phases of Galileo : the text stipulates that the development and validation phase should end in 2010. The deployment phase shall run from 2008 to 2013, and include preparations for the exploitation phase. The exploitation phase is set to begin at the latest upon conclusion of the deployment phase.

Budget and financing : the European Parliament and the Council decided that the total estimated amount for costs for operating the Galileo and EGNOS systems for the period 2007-13 is EUR 3 405 million at current prices. EUR 1 005 million was already foreseen in the existing financial programming (2007-13). This amount has been increased by an additional EUR 2 000 million through a review of the current financial framework (2007-13). Furthermore, a sum of EUR 400 million is made available from the 7th RDFP.

The Commission is invited, in 2010, together with its mid-term review, to submit a proposal for the financing programming period starting in 2014 on the public funds and commitments, including any obligation needed for the exploitation phase, deriving from its responsibility relating to the public ownership of the system, and objectives for a pricing policy ensuring that costumer receive high quality services at fair prices and the revenue-sharing mechanism needed for the exploitation phase. It shall, in particular, include a reasoned feasibility study of the advantages and disadvantages of the use of service concession contracts or public service contracts with the private sector. Member States may provide additional funding to the programme to cover the investment of the evolution to the agreed system architecture in particular cases. Third countries or international organisations may also provide additional funding to the programme.

Compatibility and interoperability of the systems : the Commission shall make every effort to ensure the compatibility and interoperability of the systems, networks and services of EGNOS and Galileo and shall pursue the benefits of compatibility and interoperability of EGNOS and Galileo with other navigation systems and where possible with conventional navigation means.

General framework for governance of the programmes : the Commission, assisted by the Committee, shall be responsible for the management of the programmes, which it shall conduct in a transparent manner. It shall avoid duplication of structures and functions, through a clear division of tasks with the GSA and ESA. The Commission must establish the appropriate instruments, including the implementation of an integrated Galileo programme risk management at all levels of the programme as well as structural measures to identify, control, mitigate and monitor risks, and ensure it possesses the resources needed to accomplish this task.

Governance of security matters : Member States should adopt national security regulations that guarantee at least the same level of protection for EU classified information on the two programmes as is required for the industrial security of EURATOM. If the operation of the systems should pose a risk to the security of the EU or Member States, joint action should be taken under the Common Foreign and Security Policy. The text states that whenever the security of the EU or its Member States may be affected by the operation of the systems as foreseen by the Joint Action 2004/552/CFSP, the procedures of the Joint Action shall apply. Matters falling exclusively within Title V and/or Title VI of the TEU will not be within the remit of the European GNSS Programmes Committee.

Application of security regulations : Member States must apply to any person or legal entity established on their territory, which are dealing with EU classified information regarding the programmes, security regulations ensuring a degree of protection at least equivalent to that guaranteed by the rules on security of the Commission stipulated in the Annex to Commission Decision 2001/844/EC, and by the security regulations of the Council in the Annex to the Council Decision 2001/264/EC.

The role of the European GNSS Supervisory Authority (GSA): following criticism that the role of the GSA was not clearly set out in the Commission proposal for the deployment phase, the GSA's tasks are revised. The GSA will now monitor the implementation of security procedures and perform system security audits. The Commission is asked formally to align the structures for the programmes' management with the GSA's new role. The GSA shall accomplish certain prescribed tasks within the programmes in accordance with guidelines issued by the Commission: (a) on programmes' security it must ensure security accreditation, and operation of the Galileo security centre; (b) it shall contribute to the preparation of the commercialisation of the systems, including the necessary market analysis; (c) other tasks entrusted to it by the Commission.

Procurement principles related to the deployment phase of Galileo : the Community's public procurement rules will apply to the deployment phase of Galileo without prejudice to measures required to protect the essential interests of the security of the EC or public security or to comply with EU export control requirements. During the procurement, the following objectives shall be pursued: (a) promoting a balanced participation of industry at all levels, including in particular SME, across the Member States; (b) avoiding possible abuse of dominance or long-term dependence on single suppliers; (c) taking advantage of prior public sector investments and lessons learned as well as industrial experience and competences, including that acquired in the definition and development phases of the European GNSS programmes, while ensuring that competitive tendering shall not be prejudiced. To that end, certain principles for the procurement of the activities of the deployment phase of Galileo will apply:

(a) split of the procurement of the infrastructure into a set of six main work packages (system engineering support, ground mission infrastructure completion, ground control infrastructure completion, satellites, launchers and operations) as well as a number of additional work packages, through a comprehensive overall procurement break-down; this does not rule out the prospect of multiple simultaneous procurement strands for individual work packages, including of satellites;

(b) competitive tendering of all packages and, for the six main work packages, the use of a single procedure whereby any one independent legal entity may bid for the role of prime contractor for a maximum of two of the six main work packages;

(c) at least 40 % of the aggregated value of the activities to be subcontracted by competitive tendering at various levels to companies other than those belonging to the groups of which entities will be prime contractors of any of the main work packages. In case projections show the possibility that 40 % cannot be attained, the Commission shall take appropriate measures;

(d) dual sourcing wherever appropriate in order to ensure better overall control of programme, cost and schedule.

Protection of personal data and privacy : the Commission shall ensure that protection of personal data and privacy is guaranteed and integrated into the technical structures of the systems.

Galileo Inter-institutional Panel : given the uniqueness of the programmes and the Community's ownership of the satellite radio navigation systems, Parliament, Council and Commission agreed to set up a new inter-institutional framework, the Galileo Inter-institutional Panel (GIP) which will be composed of three representatives each of the Council and the Parliament, and one representative of the Commission. The GIP will follow the implementation of the GNSS programmes, the international agreements with third countries, the preparation of the satellite navigation markets, the effectiveness of the governance arrangements, and the annual review of the work programme.

Documents
2008/04/22
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2008/04/10
   EP - Committee final report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
Documents
2008/04/10
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
Documents
2008/04/08
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
Details

The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted a report drafted by Etelka BARSI-PATAKY (EPP-ED, HU), and made some amendments to the amended proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the further implementation of the European satellite radio-navigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo). The text adopted in Committee was the result of a compromise negotiated with the Council in informal meetings. The amended regulation contains several modifications requested by Parliament and asks the European Commission to lay down the main technical requirements for controlling access to the technologies that provide security to Galileo and EGNOS. The main amendments are as follows:

Phases of Galileo : the text stipulates that the development and validation phase should end in 2010. The deployment phase should run from 2008 to 2013. It shall include preparations for the exploitation phase. The exploitation phase is set to begin at the latest upon conclusion of the deployment phase.

Budget and financing : the European Parliament and the Council decided that the total estimated amount for costs for operating the Galileo and EGNOS systems for the period 2007-13 is EUR 3 405 million at current prices. EUR 1 005 million was already foreseen in the existing financial programming (2007-13). This amount has been increased by an additional EUR 2 000 million through a review of the current financial framework (2007-13). Furthermore, a sum of EUR 400 million is made available from the 7th RDFP.

The Commission is invited, in 2010, together with its mid-term review, to submit a proposal for the financing programming period starting in 2014 on the public funds and commitments, including any obligation needed for the exploitation phase, deriving from its responsibility relating to the public ownership of the system, and objectives for a pricing policy ensuring that costumer receive high quality services at fair prices and the revenue-sharing mechanism needed for the exploitation phase. It shall, in particular, include a reasoned feasibility study of the advantages and disadvantages of the use of service concession contracts or public service contracts with the private sector. Member States may provide additional funding to the programme to cover the investment of the evolution to the agreed system architecture in particular cases. Third countries or international organisations may also provide additional funding to the programme.

Compatibility and interoperability of the systems : the Commission shall make every effort to ensure the compatibility and interoperability of the systems, networks and services of EGNOS and Galileo and shall pursue the benefits of compatibility and interoperability of EGNOS and Galileo with other navigation systems and where possible with conventional navigation means.

General framework for governance of the programmes : the Commission, assisted by the Committee, shall be responsible for the management of the programmes, which it shall conduct in a transparent manner. It shall avoid duplication of structures and functions, through a clear division of tasks with the GSA and ESA. The Commission must establish the appropriate instruments, including the implementation of an integrated Galileo programme risk management at all levels of the programme as well as structural measures to identify, control, mitigate and monitor risks, and ensure it possesses the resources needed to accomplish this task.

Governance of security matters : Member States should adopt national security regulations that guarantee at least the same level of protection for EU classified information on the two programmes as is required for the industrial security of EURATOM. If the operation of the systems should pose a risk to the security of the EU or Member States, joint action should be taken under the Common Foreign and Security Policy. The text states that whenever the security of the EU or its Member States may be affected by the operation of the systems as foreseen by the Joint Action 2004/552/CFSP, the procedures of the Joint Action shall apply. Matters falling exclusively within Title V and/or Title VI of the TEU will not be within the remit of the European GNSS Programmes Committee.

Application of security regulations : Member States must apply to any person or legal entity established on their territory, which are dealing with EU classified information regarding the programmes, security regulations ensuring a degree of protection at least equivalent to that guaranteed by the rules on security of the Commission stipulated in the Annex to Commission Decision 2001/844/EC, and by the security regulations of the Council in the Annex to the Council Decision 2001/264/EC.

The role of the European GNSS Supervisory Authority (GSA): following criticism that the role of the GSA was not clearly set out in the Commission proposal for the deployment phase, the GSA's tasks are revised. The GSA will now monitor the implementation of security procedures and perform system security audits. The Commission is asked formally to align the structures for the programmes' management with the GSA's new role. The GSA shall accomplish certain prescribed tasks within the programmes in accordance with guidelines issued by the Commission: (a) on programmes' security it must ensure security accreditation, and operation of the Galileo security centre; (b) it shall contribute to the preparation of the commercialisation of the systems, including the necessary market analysis; (c) other tasks entrusted to it by the Commission.

Procurement principles related to the deployment phase of Galileo : the Community's public procurement rules will apply to the deployment phase of Galileo without prejudice to measures required to protect the essential interests of the security of the EC or public security or to comply with EU export control requirements. During the procurement, the following objectives shall be pursued: (a) promoting a balanced participation of industry at all levels, including in particular SME, across the Member States; (b) avoiding possible abuse of dominance or long-term dependence on single suppliers; (c) taking advantage of prior public sector investments and lessons learned as well as industrial experience and competences, including that acquired in the definition and development phases of the European GNSS programmes, while ensuring that competitive tendering shall not be prejudiced. To that end, certain principles for the procurement of the activities of the deployment phase of Galileo will apply:

(a) split of the procurement of the infrastructure into a set of six main work packages (system engineering support, ground mission infrastructure completion, ground control infrastructure completion, satellites, launchers and operations) as well as a number of additional work packages, through a comprehensive overall procurement break-down; this does not rule out the prospect of multiple simultaneous procurement strands for individual work packages, including of satellites;

(b) competitive tendering of all packages and, for the six main work packages, the use of a single procedure whereby any one independent legal entity may bid for the role of prime contractor for a maximum of two of the six main work packages;

(c) at least 40 % of the aggregated value of the activities to be subcontracted by competitive tendering at various levels to companies other than those belonging to the groups of which entities will be prime contractors of any of the main work packages. In case projections show the possibility that 40 % cannot be attained, the Commission shall take appropriate measures;

(d)dual sourcing wherever appropriate in order to ensure better overall control of programme, cost and schedule.

Protection of personal data and privacy : the Commission shall ensure that protection of personal data and privacy is guaranteed and integrated into the technical structures of the systems.

Galileo Inter-institutional Panel : given the uniqueness of the programmes and the Community's ownership of the satellite radio navigation systems, Parliament, Council and Commission agreed to set up a new inter-institutional framework, the Galileo Inter-institutional Panel (GIP) which will be composed of three representatives each of the Council and the Parliament, and one representative of the Commission. The GIP will follow the implementation of the GNSS programmes, the international agreements with third countries, the preparation of the satellite navigation markets, the effectiveness of the governance arrangements, and the annual review of the work programme.

2008/04/07
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council reached a general approach on an amended proposal for a Regulation on the further implementation of the European satellite radio navigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo), which constitute a key project for the European Union.

The agreed text is the result of work carried out within the Council's bodies and of the presidency's informal negotiations with the European Parliament. On this basis, the European Parliament will adopt its first-reading opinion at its April or May session. This amended proposal constitutes the legal basis for the budgetary implementation of the programmes during the current financial period 2007-2013. It therefore needs to be finalised as quickly as possible and adopted by both institutions in the framework of the codecision procedure.

Due to significant changes in the course of the programme, the draft regulation provides for a series of amendments to the Commission's initial proposal, taking into account the abandonment of the concession scheme for the deployment phase in particular. The main modifications are the following:

the European Community will assume responsibility for the deployment of the system; budgetary resources needed to finance both programmes for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013 are set at EUR 3.4 billion; the EGNOS programme is included in the regulation as one of the two pillars of European satellite radio navigation policy and the EGNOS system should be declared operational as soon as possible ; the public governance of the programme is strengthened by strictly defining the responsibilities of the European Community (represented by the Commission), the European GNSS Supervisory Authority and the European Space Agency, and by declaring the Commission responsible for the management of the programme.

Further modifications in the text agreed by the ministers are the result of the negotiations with the European Parliament. They concern the following issues in particular:

the role of the European GNSS Supervisory Authority: the GSA will ensure the security accreditation of the system and the operation of the Galileo security centre, and contribute to the preparation of the commercialisation of the systems. In addition, the GSA will also be able to accomplish other tasks entrusted to it by the Commission, in particular the promotion of applications and services and ensuring the certification of the components of the systems;

the Galileo Interinstitutional Panel: the European Parliament, the Council, and the European Commission agreed to meet in the GIP, which will follow the progress on the implementation of the programmes in particular, and its main purpose will be to ensure a comprehensive exchange of information. The GIP will be composed of three representatives from the Council, three from the European Parliament and one from the Commission and will meet, in principle, four times a year; comitology issues: in the framework of the comitology procedure, in particular the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, the institutions agreed on a balanced solution providing for further involvement of the European Parliament.

The Commission will present an annual report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of the programmes. A mid-term review of the programmes will be carried out in 2010. In particular, it will include a review of costs, risks and likely revenues from the services offered by Galileo.

Documents
2008/04/07
   CSL - Council Meeting
2008/01/31
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/01/28
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/01/23
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/01/11
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2007/11/14
   EP - SCHINAS Margaritis (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2007/10/09
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2007/10/09
   CSL - Council Meeting
2007/10/09
   EP - BARSI-PATAKY Etelka (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2007/10/09
   EP - JENSEN Anne E. (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2007/09/19
   EC - Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation
Details

PURPOSE: to present an amended proposal by the Commission on the further implementation of the European satellite radionavigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo).

BACKGROUND:

- 14 July 2004 : the Commission adopted a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the implementation of the deployment and commercial operating phases of the European programme of satellite radionavigation.

- 21 April 2005 : the Council reached an agreement (partial general approach) on the Commission's proposal for a Regulation, with the exception of the budgetary details, with final approval dependant on the outcome of the debate on the 2007-13 financial framework. The main amendment introduced by the Council was to include the EGNOS programme in the proposed Regulation.

- 5 September 2005 : Parliament also examined the text at first reading and gave a generally very positive opinion of it. Like the Council it wished to see the EGNOS programme included in the proposed Regulation.

- 22 March 2007 : in the light of the difficulties that arose in the negotiations on the concession contract, the Transport Council asked the Commission: i) to assess all progress made regarding the Galileo project; ii) to propose, as soon as possible, ways of guaranteeing the public financial commitments in the long term; iii) to provide for a scenario for making EGNOS satellite navigation services available in the short term; iv) to assess the progress of the concession contract negotiations and to suggest detailed alternative scenarios (see RSP/2006/2629 ).

- 26 April 2007 : the European Parliament made a similar request in its Resolution on the Galileo concession contract negotiations, in particular to improve the public management of the programme by ensuring clear political responsibility and the Commission's leadership role (see RSP/2007/2548 ).

- 16 May 2007 : the Commission responded to the requests made by Parliament and the Council in a Communication (see also RSP/2007/2548 ). Firstly, it invited them to take note of the failure of the negotiations on the concession contract, to reaffirm the necessity to put in place an autonomous satellite navigation system and to recognise that, in this respect, the characteristics of the Galileo system remain fully compatible with the ambitions of the European Union.

- 8 June 2007 : the Council adopted a Resolution in which it largely agreed to the Commission's proposals. In particular, the Council: i) concluded that the concession contract negotiations had failed and should be ended; ii) invited the Commission to continue with the implementation of a certifiable EGNOS, with the initial service available by 2008; iii) reaffirmed the value of Galileo as a key project of the European Union and supported the deployment of the Galileo system by the end of 2012; iv) recognised that the implementation of a deployment of Galileo and EGNOS by the public sector would need additional public funding; v) requested the Commission to submit to it by September 2007 detailed proposals for financing, proposals for an implementation and procurement strategy which will have to reflect progress made so far as well as the need for competition, concepts for the role of the private sector in the commercial operating phase, and proposals for a sound public-sector management structure of the programme on the basis of a clear division of responsibilities between the Commission, the European Space Agency, the European GNSS Supervisory Authority, Member States and the Council.

- 20 June 2007 : in its Resolution on the financing of Galileo, Parliament supported the proposals put forward by the Commission in its Communication of 16 May 2007, in particular regarding Community financing for the programmes and the need to improve public governance of them.

CONTENT: in the light of the changes in the course of the Galileo programme since the start of 2007, in particular the fact that the European Community will now assume direct responsibility for the deployment of the system and the resulting additional cost of EUR 2 100 million for the Community budget during the 2007-2013 financial framework, it is necessary to amend the initial proposal for a Regulation.

The proposals put forward by the Commission to amend its initial proposal for a Regulation reflect the abandonment of the concession plan for the deployment phase, as well as the various comments made by Parliament and the Council:

1) the amended text now fully incorporates the EGNOS programme . It identifies it, alongside Galileo, as one of the two pillars of European satellite radionavigation policy. Both systems and programmes are also clearly defined: a) the EGNOS system is an infrastructure using signals emitted, initially, by the American GPS and the Russian GLONASS systems. It increases their reliability over a geographical area mainly covering Europe; b) the system established under the Galileo programme is an autonomous GNSS infrastructure consisting of a constellation of satellites and earth stations.

2) the proposed text reflects the abandonment of the concession plan for the deployment phase of the Galileo programme and the fact that all aspects of this phase will be undertaken by the European Community . The budgetary resources needed to finance the two programmes between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2013 are now EUR 3 405 million . EUR 1 005 million is already foreseen in the existing financial programming (2007-13) under the Commission's proposed legislation for the implementation of the deployment and commercial operating phases of the Galileo programme. It is proposed to increase the above figure by an additional EUR 2 100 million the allocation of which will be subject to a review of the current financial framework (2007-13). The funds are provided from unused margins in headings 2 and 5 for 2007 and 2008. As a result, the text of the amended proposal shall stipulate that the Community budget for 2007-13 foresee EUR 3 105 million for the European GNSS programmes. A sum of EUR 300 million , which is available for the European GNSS programmes under the Seventh Research and Development Framework Programme, will help cover these costs. This amount also covers costs linked to the delays in the development phase of the Galileo programme, which will only be completed in 2010. Lastly, recent studies carried out by the Commission conclude that the Galileo system is likely to be deployed in mid-2013.

3) the text allows the commercial operation of the EGNOS system from 2009 , with a one-year delay due to ongoing pre-qualification work.

4) the proposed text aims to improve the public governance of the programmes : halting the concession contract negotiations left a legal vacuum regarding the role of the Supervisory Authority during the deployment and commercial operating phases of the Galileo programme, as the tasks assigned to the Authority under Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 mainly entailed selecting a concession holder. The Commission must therefore put forward a proposal amending Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 once the European Union has adopted the necessary political decisions, in order to ensure a solid and coherent framework for the public governance of the programmes. Nevertheless, several measures can already be taken. The proposed text strengthens public governance in two ways:

a) by providing for a strict division of responsibilities between the European Community, represented by the Commission, the European GNSS Supervisory Authority and the European Space Agency, and by conferring the implementation of the programmes upon the Commission. The European GNSS Supervisory Authority will, in addition to its core role of facilitating the introduction of the services offered by the systems on commercial markets, assist the Commission in all matters linked to the implementation of the programmes. Technical aspects are the responsibility of the European Space Agency. Contracts concluded by the Agency must comply with relevant Community rules on public contracts;

b) by providing for the setting up of the Committee on European GNSS Programmes, which will help the Commission implement this Regulation and ensure the uniform management of the programmes, faster decision-making and equal access to information.

The implementation of these programmes must be accompanied by the establishment of the appropriate components and resources. Amongst other things, the tasks which were to be undertaken by the concession holder must now be carried out by the Commission, with the help of independent experts, experts from the Member States and a specialised team.

2007/09/19
   EP/CSL - Formal reconsultation of Parliament
2007/09/18
   EC - Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published
Details

PURPOSE: to present an amended proposal by the Commission on the further implementation of the European satellite radionavigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo).

BACKGROUND:

- 14 July 2004 : the Commission adopted a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the implementation of the deployment and commercial operating phases of the European programme of satellite radionavigation.

- 21 April 2005 : the Council reached an agreement (partial general approach) on the Commission's proposal for a Regulation, with the exception of the budgetary details, with final approval dependant on the outcome of the debate on the 2007-13 financial framework. The main amendment introduced by the Council was to include the EGNOS programme in the proposed Regulation.

- 5 September 2005 : Parliament also examined the text at first reading and gave a generally very positive opinion of it. Like the Council it wished to see the EGNOS programme included in the proposed Regulation.

- 22 March 2007 : in the light of the difficulties that arose in the negotiations on the concession contract, the Transport Council asked the Commission: i) to assess all progress made regarding the Galileo project; ii) to propose, as soon as possible, ways of guaranteeing the public financial commitments in the long term; iii) to provide for a scenario for making EGNOS satellite navigation services available in the short term; iv) to assess the progress of the concession contract negotiations and to suggest detailed alternative scenarios (see RSP/2006/2629 ).

- 26 April 2007 : the European Parliament made a similar request in its Resolution on the Galileo concession contract negotiations, in particular to improve the public management of the programme by ensuring clear political responsibility and the Commission's leadership role (see RSP/2007/2548 ).

- 16 May 2007 : the Commission responded to the requests made by Parliament and the Council in a Communication (see also RSP/2007/2548 ). Firstly, it invited them to take note of the failure of the negotiations on the concession contract, to reaffirm the necessity to put in place an autonomous satellite navigation system and to recognise that, in this respect, the characteristics of the Galileo system remain fully compatible with the ambitions of the European Union.

- 8 June 2007 : the Council adopted a Resolution in which it largely agreed to the Commission's proposals. In particular, the Council: i) concluded that the concession contract negotiations had failed and should be ended; ii) invited the Commission to continue with the implementation of a certifiable EGNOS, with the initial service available by 2008; iii) reaffirmed the value of Galileo as a key project of the European Union and supported the deployment of the Galileo system by the end of 2012; iv) recognised that the implementation of a deployment of Galileo and EGNOS by the public sector would need additional public funding; v) requested the Commission to submit to it by September 2007 detailed proposals for financing, proposals for an implementation and procurement strategy which will have to reflect progress made so far as well as the need for competition, concepts for the role of the private sector in the commercial operating phase, and proposals for a sound public-sector management structure of the programme on the basis of a clear division of responsibilities between the Commission, the European Space Agency, the European GNSS Supervisory Authority, Member States and the Council.

- 20 June 2007 : in its Resolution on the financing of Galileo, Parliament supported the proposals put forward by the Commission in its Communication of 16 May 2007, in particular regarding Community financing for the programmes and the need to improve public governance of them.

CONTENT: in the light of the changes in the course of the Galileo programme since the start of 2007, in particular the fact that the European Community will now assume direct responsibility for the deployment of the system and the resulting additional cost of EUR 2 100 million for the Community budget during the 2007-2013 financial framework, it is necessary to amend the initial proposal for a Regulation.

The proposals put forward by the Commission to amend its initial proposal for a Regulation reflect the abandonment of the concession plan for the deployment phase, as well as the various comments made by Parliament and the Council:

1) the amended text now fully incorporates the EGNOS programme . It identifies it, alongside Galileo, as one of the two pillars of European satellite radionavigation policy. Both systems and programmes are also clearly defined: a) the EGNOS system is an infrastructure using signals emitted, initially, by the American GPS and the Russian GLONASS systems. It increases their reliability over a geographical area mainly covering Europe; b) the system established under the Galileo programme is an autonomous GNSS infrastructure consisting of a constellation of satellites and earth stations.

2) the proposed text reflects the abandonment of the concession plan for the deployment phase of the Galileo programme and the fact that all aspects of this phase will be undertaken by the European Community . The budgetary resources needed to finance the two programmes between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2013 are now EUR 3 405 million . EUR 1 005 million is already foreseen in the existing financial programming (2007-13) under the Commission's proposed legislation for the implementation of the deployment and commercial operating phases of the Galileo programme. It is proposed to increase the above figure by an additional EUR 2 100 million the allocation of which will be subject to a review of the current financial framework (2007-13). The funds are provided from unused margins in headings 2 and 5 for 2007 and 2008. As a result, the text of the amended proposal shall stipulate that the Community budget for 2007-13 foresee EUR 3 105 million for the European GNSS programmes. A sum of EUR 300 million , which is available for the European GNSS programmes under the Seventh Research and Development Framework Programme, will help cover these costs. This amount also covers costs linked to the delays in the development phase of the Galileo programme, which will only be completed in 2010. Lastly, recent studies carried out by the Commission conclude that the Galileo system is likely to be deployed in mid-2013.

3) the text allows the commercial operation of the EGNOS system from 2009 , with a one-year delay due to ongoing pre-qualification work.

4) the proposed text aims to improve the public governance of the programmes : halting the concession contract negotiations left a legal vacuum regarding the role of the Supervisory Authority during the deployment and commercial operating phases of the Galileo programme, as the tasks assigned to the Authority under Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 mainly entailed selecting a concession holder. The Commission must therefore put forward a proposal amending Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 once the European Union has adopted the necessary political decisions, in order to ensure a solid and coherent framework for the public governance of the programmes. Nevertheless, several measures can already be taken. The proposed text strengthens public governance in two ways:

a) by providing for a strict division of responsibilities between the European Community, represented by the Commission, the European GNSS Supervisory Authority and the European Space Agency, and by conferring the implementation of the programmes upon the Commission. The European GNSS Supervisory Authority will, in addition to its core role of facilitating the introduction of the services offered by the systems on commercial markets, assist the Commission in all matters linked to the implementation of the programmes. Technical aspects are the responsibility of the European Space Agency. Contracts concluded by the Agency must comply with relevant Community rules on public contracts;

b) by providing for the setting up of the Committee on European GNSS Programmes, which will help the Commission implement this Regulation and ensure the uniform management of the programmes, faster decision-making and equal access to information.

The implementation of these programmes must be accompanied by the establishment of the appropriate components and resources. Amongst other things, the tasks which were to be undertaken by the concession holder must now be carried out by the Commission, with the help of independent experts, experts from the Member States and a specialised team.

2007/07/10
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council held an exchange of views on the possible additional public financing of Galileo, the EU's global satellite navigation system. Several delegations expressed opposition to any modification of the EU's current financial framework as a means of providing additional funding.

The Transport, Telecommunications and Energy Council, at its meeting on 6-8 June, requested detailed alternative proposals for the financing of Galileo. The Commission is expected to present in September a proposal for continued management of the project.

Galileo, launched in 2001, has accumulated a delay of five years on its initial calendar and is currently facing a number of difficulties, in particular with regard to industrial governance and the transfer of risk to the private sector.

Without prejudice to decisions to be taken in the autumn, the Transport Council expressed support for deployment of the Galileo system by the end of 2012 and recognised that this would require additional public funding.

Documents
2007/07/10
   CSL - Council Meeting
2006/06/08
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2006/06/08
   CSL - Council Meeting
2006/05/24
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Details

Package of legislative proposals following the Interinstitutional Agreement on

budgetary discipline and sound financial management

The conclusion on 17 May 2006 by the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament of the agreement on the 2007-2013 financial framework (Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management – please refer to procedure ACI/2004/2099 ) marks a real success for Europe, providing a stable financial framework for the political priorities of the enlarged Union for the next seven years. It is now up to the institutions and Member States to ensure that the financial resources available are used and implemented as well as possible. Action at European level must contribute true added value to that taken at national, regional or local level and must have an optimum impact on each European player. The Commission is ready to play a full role in all these areas.

The agreement marks a decisive step forward towards the ultimate objective of providing the Union with operational programmes by the beginning of 2007. Work must now be continued on each legislative act. To this end, the Commission intends to continue to provide momentum and act as a facilitator, as it has been doing since the start of the negotiations.

As part of the negotiations on the 2007-2013 financial framework, in October 2005 the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission adopted a joint declaration in which they undertook to continue work on the legislative proposals currently being discussed and then, once the interinstitutional agreement had been adopted and on the basis of amended proposals by the Commission, to reach agreement on each of these proposals. Thus, in accordance with Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty and in order to facilitate this phase for each legislative act, the Commission has adopted a total of 30 proposals, 26 of which are amended and 4 new.

The proposals amended as a result of the IIA are as follows:

Programmes concerning the external policy of the Union and development cooperation:

Ø COD/2004/0219 ( European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument )

Ø COD/2004/0220 ( development co-operation and economic co-operation instrument )

Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows Programme (JHA):

Ø COD/2005/0046 (European Refugee Fund)

Ø COD/2005/0047 ( External borders fund, 2007-2013 )

Ø COD/2005/0049 ( European Return Fund )

Fundamental Rights and Justice Programme (JHA):

Ø COD/2005/0037/A (DAPHNE )

Ø COD/2005/0037/B ( drugs prevention and information )

RDT Framework Programme and specific programmes :

Ø COD/2005/0043 ( RDT Framework Programme )

Ø CNS/2005/0044 (Nuclear Research Programme )

Ø CNS/2005/0184 ( Joint Research Centre - JRC )

Ø CNS/2005/0185 ( Transnational cooperation specific programme )

Ø CNS/2005/0186 ( Specific programme Ideas, frontier research )

Ø CNS/2005/0187 (S pecific programme supporting researchers )

Ø CNS/2005/0188 ( RDT Capacities specific programme )

Ø CNS/2005/0189 ( specific programme direct actions by the Joint Research Centre JRC )

Ø CNS/2005/0190 ( fusion energy, nuclear fission and radiation protection specific programme)

Employment and social cohesion Programme: COD/2004/0158

Programmes in the fields of youth and education:

Ø COD/2004/0152 ( Youth )

Ø COD/2004/0153 ( Education – lifelong learning )

Consumer Protection and Public Health Framework programme:

Ø COD/2005/0042/A ( Public health )

Ø COD/2005/0042/B ( Consumers )

Programme in the fields of energy, environment and transport :

Ø COD/2004/0218 ( LIFE+)

Ø COD/2004/0154 ( TransEuropean networks in the areas of energy and transport )

Ø CNS/2004/0221 ( Decommissioning of the Bohunice nuclear plant )

GALILEO ( radio-navigation by satellite ): COD/2004/0156

In terms of new proposals , the Commission has already submitted three in the area of agriculture and rural development policy and fisheries and aquaculture policy:

Ø CNS/2006/0081 ( fisheries and aquaculture )

Ø CNS/2006/0082 ( rural development )

Ø CNS/2006/0083 ( common agricultural policy ).

Certain legislative acts do not form part of this package of measures, in particular those on which political agreement has been reached since 17 May. For these measures, the Commission has played a full part in helping to bring about agreement between the arms of the legislative authority. The same applies to the acts for which conclusion of the interinstitutional agreement does not modify the Commission’s original proposal. For all the others, which are included in the package presented, the changes proposed by the Commission take account of the content of the interinstitutional agreement adopted, either in a simplified form, where the financial resources allocated to each programme must be adapted, or in a more detailed form where the structure or even the content of the act must be revised. It should also be noted that four of the amended proposals contain amendments already voted on by the European Parliament at first reading and that one proposal has been divided into two amended proposals in response to a request by the Council and the European Parliament, although Parliament has not yet proceeded to a first reading of this proposal.

Based on these amended proposals, the Commission calls on the European Parliament and the Council to continue their discussions of these proposals and conclude them as soon as possible in order to ensure that all the legal instruments are available in time for the effective launch of the programmes in January 2007.

2006/05/24
   EC - Modified legislative proposal
2006/05/23
   EC - Modified legislative proposal published
2005/09/06
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Etelka BARSI-PATAKY (EPP-ED, HU) making some amendments to the Commission’s proposal. The principal amendment envisages a profit-sharing mechanism to permit the refunding of the EU’s contribution to the two phases, in view of the anticipated profits from the programme’s commercial operation. The amendments in the report are as follows:

-the Regulation concerns the ‘programmes’, referring to the GALILEO and EGNOS programmes. EGNOS is a programme aiming at augmenting the American GPS and Russian GLONASS signals for reliability purposes across a broad geographical area. It is independent from and complementary to GALILEO;

-Parliament specified the time-frame for the different phases of the programme, i.e. the deployment phase (2006-2010) and the commercial operating phase (2008 onwards);

- the figure of EUR 1 billion for the financial framework is indicative, pending a decision on the financial perspective.

-in cases where financial guarantees in excess of the budgetary allocation are to be undertaken by the Community either directly or indirectly, including the concession contract, they must be subject to approval by the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with the applicable budgetary rules;

- in cases where liability commitments in excess of the budgetary allocation are to be undertaken by the Community either directly or indirectly, including the concession contract, they must also be subject to approval by the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with the applicable budgetary rules;

- a profit-sharing mechanism will be established in order to ensure the repayment of the Community contribution to the deployment and commercial operating phases.

- the concession holder will be entitled to receive the revenues deriving from the exploitation of licences and intellectual property rights for system components, ownership of which should rest with the Supervisory Authority;

- taking into account the specific nature of the programmes, the European Parliament, in order to be able to fulfil its budgetary role, will have observer status on the Administrative Board of the Supervisory Authority;

- the amount of each annual subsidy shall be decided in the framework of the EU budgetary procedure, and not on determined on the basis of the work programme of the Supervisory Authority;

-finally, every year, upon presentation of the preliminary draft budget, the Commission will present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the programmes. In 2007, a mid-term review shall be carried out in order to inform the European Parliament and the Council of the progress reached by that time.

2005/09/06
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Etelka BARSI-PATAKY (EPP-ED, HU) making some amendments to the Commission’s proposal. The principal amendment envisages a profit-sharing mechanism to permit the refunding of the EU’s contribution to the two phases, in view of the anticipated profits from the programme’s commercial operation. The amendments in the report are as follows:

-the Regulation concerns the ‘programmes’, referring to the GALILEO and EGNOS programmes. EGNOS is a programme aiming at augmenting the American GPS and Russian GLONASS signals for reliability purposes across a broad geographical area. It is independent from and complementary to GALILEO;

-Parliament specified the time-frame for the different phases of the programme, i.e. the deployment phase (2006-2010) and the commercial operating phase (2008 onwards);

- the figure of EUR 1 billion for the financial framework is indicative, pending a decision on the financial perspective.

-in cases where financial guarantees in excess of the budgetary allocation are to be undertaken by the Community either directly or indirectly, including the concession contract, they must be subject to approval by the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with the applicable budgetary rules;

- in cases where liability commitments in excess of the budgetary allocation are to be undertaken by the Community either directly or indirectly, including the concession contract, they must also be subject to approval by the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with the applicable budgetary rules;

- a profit-sharing mechanism will be established in order to ensure the repayment of the Community contribution to the deployment and commercial operating phases.

- the concession holder will be entitled to receive the revenues deriving from the exploitation of licences and intellectual property rights for system components, ownership of which should rest with the Supervisory Authority;

- taking into account the specific nature of the programmes, the European Parliament, in order to be able to fulfil its budgetary role, will have observer status on the Administrative Board of the Supervisory Authority;

- the amount of each annual subsidy shall be decided in the framework of the EU budgetary procedure, and not on determined on the basis of the work programme of the Supervisory Authority;

-finally, every year, upon presentation of the preliminary draft budget, the Commission will present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the programmes. In 2007, a mid-term review shall be carried out in order to inform the European Parliament and the Council of the progress reached by that time.

Documents
2005/09/05
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2005/07/04
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2005/07/04
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Documents
2005/06/22
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
2005/06/21
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
Details

The committee adopted the report by Etelka BARSI-PATAKY (EPP-ED, HU) broadly approving the proposal under the 1st reading of the codecision procedure, subject to a number of amendments:

- it was important to specify the time-frame for the different phases of the programme, i.e. the deployment phase (2006-2010) and the commercial operating phase (2008 onwards);

- it should be made clear that the figure of EUR 1 billion for the financial framework was indicative, pending a decision on the financial perspective. Moreover, the reference amount should be set at 2004 prices;

- taking into account the specific nature of the programme, especially the fact that it was a public-private partnership, the Community would probably have to give financial guarantees in excess of the budgetary allocation. These commitments should therefore be subject to budgetary approval by Parliament and Council;

- since the programme could prove lucrative, a profit-sharing mechanism should be set up to enable the Community contribution to be repaid;

- ownership of the Intellectual Property Rights and licences should stay with the Supervisory Authority, but the revenues generated by the exploitation of these rights could form the income of the concession holder;

- Parliament should have observer status on the Administrative Board of the Supervisory Authority;

- the amount of each annual subsidy should be decided in the framework of the EU budgetary procedure and not on the basis of the work programme of the Supervisory Authority, as stated in the proposal;

- to enable Parliament to monitor the implementation of the programme and fulfil its budgetary role, the Commission should report to Parliament and Council every year on the implementation of the programme, when presenting the preliminary draft budget, and a mid-term review should be carried out in 2007.

2005/06/16
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2005/05/31
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2005/04/21
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

Following the agreement it had already reached in December 2004, the Council formalised a partial general approach concerning the proposal for a Regulation on the implementation of the deployment and commercial operating phases of the European satellite radio navigation programme, before taking a final decision at the close of the discussions on the future financial perspective 2007-2013.

Documents
2005/04/21
   CSL - Council Meeting
2005/03/23
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2005/02/09
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
2004/11/24
   EP - BARSI-PATAKY Etelka (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2004/11/16
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2004/10/26
   EP - LEWANDOWSKI Janusz (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2004/10/07
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2004/10/07
   CSL - Council Meeting
2004/08/31
   EP - LOUIS Patrick (IND/DEM) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2004/07/14
   EC - Legislative proposal
Details

PURPOSE : to define the modalities of the financial contribution of the Community for the implementation of the deployment and commercial operating phases of the European satellite radionavigation GALILEO.

PROPOSED ACT : Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council.

CONTENT : the GALILEO programme has now reached an advanced stage of maturity and goes well beyond the framework of a simple research project. It is necessary to place it on a specific legal tool, better able to satisfy its needs and respond to the requirement for good financial management. As a result, a Community Regulation is necessary to enable the implementation of the deployment and the commercial operating phases of the programme.

During the deployment and the commercial operating phases, the construction and then the management of the system will be entrusted to a private concessionaire working under the control of the Supervisory Authority. The missions of the Supervisory Authority include managing the public funds allocated to the European Satellite radionavigation programme as well as following the financial management of this programme so as to optimise the use of public money. In addition, the Supervisory Authority carries out budgetary responsibilities given to it by the Commission.

In order to ensure the continuation of the programme, the Commission must secure the financing of the deployment and commercial operating phases which will in particular include a Community contribution.

The Community contribution to the programme allocated by this Regulation is granted with the aim of co-financing:

- activities related to the deployment phase, covering the construction and the launch of satellites as well as the complete setting up of the terrestrial infrastructure;

- the first series of activities related to the launch of the commercial operating phase, covering the management of the infrastructure composed by satellites and the associated ground stations, as well as the maintenance and updating of the system.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS :

- Budget line : specific Galileo Programme budget line;

- Period of allocation : 2007-2013;

- total allocation of the action : EUR 1 billion. This amount will be transferred to the Supervisory Authority. The annual appropriations are authorised by the Budgetary Authority within the limits of the financial perspectives.

2004/07/13
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE : to define the modalities of the financial contribution of the Community for the implementation of the deployment and commercial operating phases of the European satellite radionavigation GALILEO.

PROPOSED ACT : Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council.

CONTENT : the GALILEO programme has now reached an advanced stage of maturity and goes well beyond the framework of a simple research project. It is necessary to place it on a specific legal tool, better able to satisfy its needs and respond to the requirement for good financial management. As a result, a Community Regulation is necessary to enable the implementation of the deployment and the commercial operating phases of the programme.

During the deployment and the commercial operating phases, the construction and then the management of the system will be entrusted to a private concessionaire working under the control of the Supervisory Authority. The missions of the Supervisory Authority include managing the public funds allocated to the European Satellite radionavigation programme as well as following the financial management of this programme so as to optimise the use of public money. In addition, the Supervisory Authority carries out budgetary responsibilities given to it by the Commission.

In order to ensure the continuation of the programme, the Commission must secure the financing of the deployment and commercial operating phases which will in particular include a Community contribution.

The Community contribution to the programme allocated by this Regulation is granted with the aim of co-financing:

- activities related to the deployment phase, covering the construction and the launch of satellites as well as the complete setting up of the terrestrial infrastructure;

- the first series of activities related to the launch of the commercial operating phase, covering the management of the infrastructure composed by satellites and the associated ground stations, as well as the maintenance and updating of the system.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS :

- Budget line : specific Galileo Programme budget line;

- Period of allocation : 2007-2013;

- total allocation of the action : EUR 1 billion. This amount will be transferred to the Supervisory Authority. The annual appropriations are authorised by the Budgetary Authority within the limits of the financial perspectives.

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Barsi-Pataky A6-0144/2008 - résolution #

2008/04/23 Outcome: +: 607, -: 36, 0: 8
DE FR IT PL ES GB RO BE PT CZ BG AT HU NL EL LT FI SK LV IE SI DK SE EE LU MT CY
Total
87
68
55
48
44
65
27
21
20
21
18
16
16
20
19
12
12
12
9
10
7
10
16
6
5
2
5
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
251
2

Denmark PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
172

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Denmark PSE

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
84

Spain ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
33

Lithuania UEN

1

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
27

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Germany GUE/NGL

4

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/1/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:221:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:221:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-349921_EN.html
docs/3
date
2005-05-31T00:00:00
docs
title: PE359.923
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/3
date
2005-05-02T00:00:00
docs
title: PE357.781
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/3/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-359923_EN.html
docs/4
date
2005-05-31T00:00:00
docs
title: PE359.923
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/4
date
2005-06-16T00:00:00
docs
title: PE357.939
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-357939_EN.html
docs/5
date
2005-06-16T00:00:00
docs
title: PE357.939
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/7
date
2006-05-24T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0239/COM_COM(2006)0239_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0239/COM_COM(2006)0239_EN.pdf
docs/8
date
2006-05-24T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/9
date
2007-09-19T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation
body
EC
docs/9/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0535/COM_COM(2007)0535_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0535/COM_COM(2007)0535_EN.pdf
docs/10
date
2007-09-19T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation
body
EC
docs/11
date
2008-01-23T00:00:00
docs
title: PE398.607
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/11/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-398607_EN.html
docs/12
date
2008-01-23T00:00:00
docs
title: PE398.607
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/12
date
2008-01-28T00:00:00
docs
title: PE398.335
committee
TRAN
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/12/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-398335_EN.html
docs/13
date
2008-01-28T00:00:00
docs
title: PE398.335
committee
TRAN
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/15
date
2008-05-28T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2008)3169
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/15/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14883&j=0&l=en
docs/16
date
2008-04-15T00:00:00
docs
title: PE404.800
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/17
date
2008-05-28T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2008)3169
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/18
date
2011-01-12T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/18/type
Old
Non-legislative basic document
New
Follow-up document
docs/20
date
2011-01-12T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
events/0
date
2004-07-13T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/9
date
2006-05-23T00:00:00
type
Modified legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
events/13
date
2007-09-18T00:00:00
type
Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/17
date
2008-04-10T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0144_EN.html title: A6-0144/2008
events/20
date
2008-07-24T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
summary
docs
events/24
date
2008-07-24T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
summary
docs
events/24/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:196:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2008:196:TOC
links/National parliaments/url
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2004&number=0156&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2004&number=0156&appLng=EN
docs/0
date
2004-07-14T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/0
date
2005-02-09T00:00:00
docs
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/1
date
2005-03-23T00:00:00
docs
title: PE349.921
committee
TRAN
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/1
date
2005-02-09T00:00:00
docs
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE349.921&secondRef=02
docs/2
date
2005-03-23T00:00:00
docs
title: PE349.921
committee
TRAN
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4
date
2005-06-16T00:00:00
docs
title: PE357.939
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE357.939&secondRef=02
docs/5
date
2005-06-16T00:00:00
docs
title: PE357.939
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/5
date
2005-07-04T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0212_EN.html title: A6-0212/2005
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/6
date
2005-07-04T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0212_EN.html title: A6-0212/2005
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/6
date
2005-09-06T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0212_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0212_EN.html
docs/7
date
2005-09-06T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/7
date
2005-10-20T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4183&j=0&l=en title: SP(2005)4139
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0313_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0313_EN.html
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0239/COM_COM(2006)0239_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0239/COM_COM(2006)0239_EN.pdf
docs/9
date
2006-05-24T00:00:00
docs
type
Modified legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/9
date
2006-05-24T00:00:00
docs
type
Modified legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/10
date
2008-01-11T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.389 title: PE400.389
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/10
date
2007-09-19T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation
body
EC
docs/11
date
2008-01-11T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.389 title: PE400.389
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/11
date
2008-01-23T00:00:00
docs
title: PE398.607
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/11/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.389
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE400.389
docs/11/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE398.607&secondRef=03
docs/12
date
2008-01-23T00:00:00
docs
title: PE398.607
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/12
date
2008-01-28T00:00:00
docs
title: PE398.335
committee
TRAN
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/12/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE398.335&secondRef=03
docs/13
date
2008-01-28T00:00:00
docs
title: PE398.335
committee
TRAN
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/13
date
2008-01-31T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE396.800 title: PE396.800
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/14
date
2008-01-31T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE396.800 title: PE396.800
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/14
date
2008-04-10T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0144_EN.html title: A6-0144/2008
type
Committee final report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
body
EP
docs/14/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE396.800
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE396.800
docs/15
date
2008-04-10T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0144_EN.html title: A6-0144/2008
type
Committee final report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
body
EP
docs/15/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0144_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0144_EN.html
docs/17
date
2008-05-28T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2008)3169
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/18
date
2011-01-12T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/20
date
2011-01-12T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/20/type
Old
Follow-up document
New
Non-legislative basic document
events/0
date
2004-07-14T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/1
date
2004-11-16T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/2
date
2004-11-16T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2005-06-21T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
summary
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/4
date
2005-06-21T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
summary
events/4
date
2005-06-22T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4/type
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
events/5
date
2005-06-22T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/5
date
2005-07-04T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0212_EN.html title: A6-0212/2005
events/6
date
2005-09-05T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050905&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2005-07-04T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0212_EN.html title: A6-0212/2005
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050905&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20050905&type=CRE
events/7
date
2005-09-05T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050905&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/7
date
2005-09-06T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0313_EN.html title: T6-0313/2005
summary
events/8
date
2005-09-06T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4183&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/9
date
2005-09-06T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0313_EN.html title: T6-0313/2005
summary
events/10
date
2006-05-24T00:00:00
type
Modified legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
events/13
date
2008-04-08T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
summary
events/13/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/14
date
2008-04-22T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080422&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/14
date
2007-09-19T00:00:00
type
Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/14/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080422&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080422&type=CRE
events/15
date
2008-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14883&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/16
date
2008-04-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0167_EN.html title: T6-0167/2008
summary
events/17
date
2008-04-08T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
summary
events/18
date
2008-04-10T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0144_EN.html title: A6-0144/2008
events/19
date
2008-04-22T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080422&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/20
date
2008-04-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0167_EN.html title: T6-0167/2008
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2007-10-09T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2004-11-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: SCHINAS Margaritis date: 2007-11-14T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2007-11-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SCHINAS Margaritis group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
rapporteur
name: JENSEN Anne E. date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2007-10-09T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: JENSEN Anne E. group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2004-10-26T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/7
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
rapporteur
name: LOUIS Patrick date: 2004-08-31T00:00:00 group: Independence and democracy abbr: IND/DEM
committees/7
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2004-08-31T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LOUIS Patrick group: Independence and democracy abbr: IND/DEM
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE349.921
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE349.921&secondRef=02
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-212&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0212_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-313
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0313_EN.html
docs/7
date
2006-05-24T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/7
date
2005-10-20T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4183&j=0&l=en title: SP(2005)4139
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/8
date
2006-05-24T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0239/COM_COM(2006)0239_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0239/COM_COM(2006)0239_EN.pdf
docs/13
date
2008-04-10T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-144&language=EN title: A6-0144/2008
type
Committee final report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
body
EP
docs/14
date
2008-04-10T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-144&language=EN title: A6-0144/2008
type
Committee final report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
body
EP
docs/14/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-144&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0144_EN.html
docs/15
date
2008-05-28T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14883&j=0&l=en title: SP(2008)3169
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
docs/17/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0302/COM_COM(2009)0302_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0302/COM_COM(2009)0302_EN.pdf
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-212&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0212_EN.html
events/8
date
2005-09-06T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-313 title: T6-0313/2005
summary
events/8
date
2005-09-06T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4183&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/9
date
2005-09-06T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-313 title: T6-0313/2005
summary
events/9/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-313
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0313_EN.html
events/13
date
2007-09-19T00:00:00
type
Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/14
date
2007-09-19T00:00:00
type
Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/14/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0535/COM_COM(2007)0535_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0535/COM_COM(2007)0535_EN.pdf
events/17
date
2008-04-10T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-144&language=EN title: A6-0144/2008
events/18
date
2008-04-10T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-144&language=EN title: A6-0144/2008
events/18/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-144&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0144_EN.html
events/19
date
2008-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14883&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/20/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-167
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0167_EN.html
events/24/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2008:196:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:196:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0239/COM_COM(2006)0239_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0239/COM_COM(2006)0239_EN.pdf
docs/17/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0302/COM_COM(2009)0302_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0302/COM_COM(2009)0302_EN.pdf
events/0
date
2004-07-14T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2004-07-14T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/24/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:196:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2008:196:TOC
activities
  • date: 2004-07-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0477/COM_COM(2004)0477_FR.pdf title: COM(2004)0477 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52004PC0477:EN body: EC commission: DG: Energy and Transport Commissioner: TAJANI Antonio type: Legislative proposal published
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2607 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2607*&MEET_DATE=07/10/2004 type: Debate in Council title: 2607 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2004-10-07T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2004-11-16T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2007-11-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SCHINAS Margaritis body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E. body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2004-08-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LOUIS Patrick
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2654 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2654*&MEET_DATE=21/04/2005 type: Debate in Council title: 2654 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2005-04-21T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2005-06-21T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2007-11-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SCHINAS Margaritis body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E. body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2004-08-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LOUIS Patrick type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2005-06-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2007-11-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SCHINAS Margaritis body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E. body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2004-08-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LOUIS Patrick
  • date: 2005-07-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-212&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0212/2005 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2007-11-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SCHINAS Margaritis body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E. body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2004-08-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LOUIS Patrick type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2005-09-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050905&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-09-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-313 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0313/2005 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-05-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=[%n] title: COM(2004)0477/2 type: Modified legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52004PC0477:EN body: EC commission: DG: Energy and Transport Commissioner: TAJANI Antonio type: Modified legislative proposal published
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2735 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2735*&MEET_DATE=08/06/2006 type: Debate in Council title: 2735 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2006-06-08T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2813 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2813*&MEET_DATE=10/07/2007 type: Debate in Council title: 2813 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2007-07-10T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2007-09-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0535/COM_COM(2007)0535_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0535 type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published celexid: CELEX:52007PC0535:EN body: EC commission: DG: Energy and Transport Commissioner: TAJANI Antonio type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published
  • date: 2007-09-19T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Formal reconsultation of Parliament
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2822 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2822*&MEET_DATE=09/10/2007 type: Debate in Council title: 2822 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2861 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2861*&MEET_DATE=07/04/2008 type: Debate in Council title: 2861 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2008-04-07T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2008-04-08T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2007-11-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SCHINAS Margaritis body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E. body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2004-08-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LOUIS Patrick type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-04-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-144&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation title: A6-0144/2008 body: unknown type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
  • date: 2008-04-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080422&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-04-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14883&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-167 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0167/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-07-03T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
  • date: 2008-07-09T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2008-07-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2008-07-24T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32008R0683 title: Regulation 2008/683 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2008:196:TOC title: OJ L 196 24.07.2008, p. 0001
commission
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2007-10-09T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2007-11-14T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: SCHINAS Margaritis
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2004-11-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2004-10-26T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2007-11-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SCHINAS Margaritis group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ITRE
date
2007-10-09T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2007-10-09T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: JENSEN Anne E. group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ITRE
date
2004-11-24T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2004-10-26T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
TRAN
date
2007-10-09T00:00:00
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E.
committees/6
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
opinion
False
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
TRAN
date
2004-08-31T00:00:00
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
rapporteur
group: IND/DEM name: LOUIS Patrick
committees/7
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2004-08-31T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LOUIS Patrick group: Independence and democracy abbr: IND/DEM
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2861 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2861*&MEET_DATE=07/04/2008 date: 2008-04-07T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2822 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2822*&MEET_DATE=09/10/2007 date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2813 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2813*&MEET_DATE=10/07/2007 date: 2007-07-10T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2735 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2735*&MEET_DATE=08/06/2006 date: 2006-06-08T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2654 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2654*&MEET_DATE=21/04/2005 date: 2005-04-21T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2607 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2607*&MEET_DATE=07/10/2004 date: 2004-10-07T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2005-02-09T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0123)(documentyear:2005)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES0123/2005 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:221:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 221 08.09.2005, p. 0028-0032 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
  • date: 2005-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE349.921 title: PE349.921 committee: TRAN type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2005-05-02T00:00:00 docs: title: PE357.781 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2005-05-31T00:00:00 docs: title: PE359.923 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2005-06-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE357.939&secondRef=02 title: PE357.939 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2005-07-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-212&language=EN title: A6-0212/2005 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-09-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-313 title: T6-0313/2005 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2006:193E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 193 17.08.2006, p. 0025-0061 E summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Etelka BARSI-PATAKY (EPP-ED, HU) making some amendments to the Commission’s proposal. The principal amendment envisages a profit-sharing mechanism to permit the refunding of the EU’s contribution to the two phases, in view of the anticipated profits from the programme’s commercial operation. The amendments in the report are as follows: -the Regulation concerns the ‘programmes’, referring to the GALILEO and EGNOS programmes. EGNOS is a programme aiming at augmenting the American GPS and Russian GLONASS signals for reliability purposes across a broad geographical area. It is independent from and complementary to GALILEO; -Parliament specified the time-frame for the different phases of the programme, i.e. the deployment phase (2006-2010) and the commercial operating phase (2008 onwards); - the figure of EUR 1 billion for the financial framework is indicative, pending a decision on the financial perspective. -in cases where financial guarantees in excess of the budgetary allocation are to be undertaken by the Community either directly or indirectly, including the concession contract, they must be subject to approval by the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with the applicable budgetary rules; - in cases where liability commitments in excess of the budgetary allocation are to be undertaken by the Community either directly or indirectly, including the concession contract, they must also be subject to approval by the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with the applicable budgetary rules; - a profit-sharing mechanism will be established in order to ensure the repayment of the Community contribution to the deployment and commercial operating phases. - the concession holder will be entitled to receive the revenues deriving from the exploitation of licences and intellectual property rights for system components, ownership of which should rest with the Supervisory Authority; - taking into account the specific nature of the programmes, the European Parliament, in order to be able to fulfil its budgetary role, will have observer status on the Administrative Board of the Supervisory Authority; - the amount of each annual subsidy shall be decided in the framework of the EU budgetary procedure, and not on determined on the basis of the work programme of the Supervisory Authority; -finally, every year, upon presentation of the preliminary draft budget, the Commission will present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the programmes. In 2007, a mid-term review shall be carried out in order to inform the European Parliament and the Council of the progress reached by that time. type: Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-05-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0239/COM_COM(2006)0239_EN.pdf title: COM(2006)0239 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=239 title: EUR-Lex summary: Package of legislative proposals following the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management The conclusion on 17 May 2006 by the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament of the agreement on the 2007-2013 financial framework (Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management – please refer to procedure ACI/2004/2099 ) marks a real success for Europe, providing a stable financial framework for the political priorities of the enlarged Union for the next seven years. It is now up to the institutions and Member States to ensure that the financial resources available are used and implemented as well as possible. Action at European level must contribute true added value to that taken at national, regional or local level and must have an optimum impact on each European player. The Commission is ready to play a full role in all these areas. The agreement marks a decisive step forward towards the ultimate objective of providing the Union with operational programmes by the beginning of 2007. Work must now be continued on each legislative act. To this end, the Commission intends to continue to provide momentum and act as a facilitator, as it has been doing since the start of the negotiations. As part of the negotiations on the 2007-2013 financial framework, in October 2005 the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission adopted a joint declaration in which they undertook to continue work on the legislative proposals currently being discussed and then, once the interinstitutional agreement had been adopted and on the basis of amended proposals by the Commission, to reach agreement on each of these proposals. Thus, in accordance with Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty and in order to facilitate this phase for each legislative act, the Commission has adopted a total of 30 proposals, 26 of which are amended and 4 new. The proposals amended as a result of the IIA are as follows: Programmes concerning the external policy of the Union and development cooperation: Ø COD/2004/0219 ( European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument ) Ø COD/2004/0220 ( development co-operation and economic co-operation instrument ) Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows Programme (JHA): Ø COD/2005/0046 (European Refugee Fund) Ø COD/2005/0047 ( External borders fund, 2007-2013 ) Ø COD/2005/0049 ( European Return Fund ) Fundamental Rights and Justice Programme (JHA): Ø COD/2005/0037/A (DAPHNE ) Ø COD/2005/0037/B ( drugs prevention and information ) RDT Framework Programme and specific programmes : Ø COD/2005/0043 ( RDT Framework Programme ) Ø CNS/2005/0044 (Nuclear Research Programme ) Ø CNS/2005/0184 ( Joint Research Centre - JRC ) Ø CNS/2005/0185 ( Transnational cooperation specific programme ) Ø CNS/2005/0186 ( Specific programme Ideas, frontier research ) Ø CNS/2005/0187 (S pecific programme supporting researchers ) Ø CNS/2005/0188 ( RDT Capacities specific programme ) Ø CNS/2005/0189 ( specific programme direct actions by the Joint Research Centre JRC ) Ø CNS/2005/0190 ( fusion energy, nuclear fission and radiation protection specific programme) Employment and social cohesion Programme: COD/2004/0158 Programmes in the fields of youth and education: Ø COD/2004/0152 ( Youth ) Ø COD/2004/0153 ( Education – lifelong learning ) Consumer Protection and Public Health Framework programme: Ø COD/2005/0042/A ( Public health ) Ø COD/2005/0042/B ( Consumers ) Programme in the fields of energy, environment and transport : Ø COD/2004/0218 ( LIFE+) Ø COD/2004/0154 ( TransEuropean networks in the areas of energy and transport ) Ø CNS/2004/0221 ( Decommissioning of the Bohunice nuclear plant ) GALILEO ( radio-navigation by satellite ): COD/2004/0156 In terms of new proposals , the Commission has already submitted three in the area of agriculture and rural development policy and fisheries and aquaculture policy: Ø CNS/2006/0081 ( fisheries and aquaculture ) Ø CNS/2006/0082 ( rural development ) Ø CNS/2006/0083 ( common agricultural policy ). Certain legislative acts do not form part of this package of measures, in particular those on which political agreement has been reached since 17 May. For these measures, the Commission has played a full part in helping to bring about agreement between the arms of the legislative authority. The same applies to the acts for which conclusion of the interinstitutional agreement does not modify the Commission’s original proposal. For all the others, which are included in the package presented, the changes proposed by the Commission take account of the content of the interinstitutional agreement adopted, either in a simplified form, where the financial resources allocated to each programme must be adapted, or in a more detailed form where the structure or even the content of the act must be revised. It should also be noted that four of the amended proposals contain amendments already voted on by the European Parliament at first reading and that one proposal has been divided into two amended proposals in response to a request by the Council and the European Parliament, although Parliament has not yet proceeded to a first reading of this proposal. Based on these amended proposals, the Commission calls on the European Parliament and the Council to continue their discussions of these proposals and conclude them as soon as possible in order to ensure that all the legal instruments are available in time for the effective launch of the programmes in January 2007. type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2006-05-24T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=[%n] title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2004)0477/2 type: Modified legislative proposal body: EC
  • date: 2008-01-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.389 title: PE400.389 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-01-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE398.607&secondRef=03 title: PE398.607 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-01-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE398.335&secondRef=03 title: PE398.335 committee: TRAN type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-01-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE396.800 title: PE396.800 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-04-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-144&language=EN title: A6-0144/2008 type: Committee final report tabled for plenary, reconsultation body: EP
  • date: 2008-04-15T00:00:00 docs: title: PE404.800 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-05-28T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14883&j=0&l=en title: SP(2008)3169 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2008-07-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=[%n4]%2F08&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 03636/2008/LEX type: Draft final act body: CSL
  • date: 2009-06-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0302/COM_COM(2009)0302_EN.pdf title: COM(2009)0302 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2009&nu_doc=302 title: EUR-Lex summary: The Commission presents the First Annual Report on the implementation of GNSS Regulation (Galileo and EGNOS) in accordance with Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 on the further implementation of the European satellite radio navigation programmes and with reference to the GNSS work programme adopted in 2008. The GNSS Regulation re-profiles the European GNSS programmes by establishing a legal and financial framework for the 2008-2013 period. It was adopted by the European Parliament and Council on a proposal that the European Commission presented in September 2007, following the decision to end the negotiations for the conclusion of a concession contract with the private sector in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 876/2002, and in line with the Council’s Conclusions of November 2007 on the need to restructure the European Global Navigation Satellite System Programmes. The report highlights the status of implementation of some important decisions that were taken in 2008 in close cooperation between the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council. The Commission will seek to ensure close involvement of the other institutions, as appropriate. Their continued support for the further implementation of the programmes, in line with a shared commitment, is key to the success of the programmes. Legal framework : the GNSS Regulation provides the legal and financial framework for the deployment of the Programmes and defines a governance structure with new roles for the various organisations involved, based on two main principles: (i) a strict division of responsibilities between the European Commission, the European Space Agency and the GNSS Supervisory Authority, set up by Council Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 on the establishment of structures for the management of the European satellite radio-navigation programmes (GSA Regulation) with the Commission having the overall responsibility for the management of the programme, including the security related aspects; (ii) the complete financing of the Galileo deployment phase (Full Operational Capability - FOC) from 2008 to 2013 by the Community budget. Main milestones : in its new role as programme manager, the Commission has launched important initiatives to reach the milestones needed for the further achievement of the objectives of the programmes and it has successfully achieved these milestones. By doing so the Commission has ensured that the necessary framework is in place in order to move on with the next steps in the implementation of the programmes. For EGNOS this means that the Commission has ensured a smooth continuation of operations after the hand-over of the system by the European Space Agency (ESA) to the Commission on 1 April 2009 by taking over the ownership, on behalf of the Community, of the EGNOS system, from ESA (by arrangements with ESA and the EOIG, the EGNOS Operators and Infrastructure Group): an operations contract with ESSP SaS (EGNOS Satellite Services Provider) that will guarantee operations until October 2009, after which a long-term contract covering the period until 2013 will be put in place; agreeing with ESA that it will take on tasks for the design and procurement of EGNOS equipment and software renewals; establishing the main management interfaces in the management and execution of the EGNOS programme activities subject to the Delegation Agreement, in a Programme Management Plan developed with ESA; contracting out the supply of a special satellite navigation transponder on a new geostationary satellite. Furthermore, while a short-term contract with an operator for the EGNOS service has been in place from that date, further work needs to be done to come to a more permanent solution by autumn 2009 and also to achieve certification of EGNOS for aviation. This should be concluded by the first quarter of 2010, taking into account the requirements of the Single European Sky regulation. Equally, compliance with the performance requirements of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) will need to be ensured. As referred to in the Work Programme 2009, significant marketing activities will have to be deployed for EGNOS to facilitate its acceptance and use by the aviation sector and other areas such as road, rail, maritime and agriculture. For GALILEO it means that the Commission has taken all steps necessary for the procurement of the Galileo system, and has: delegated to ESA the task of procuring the Galileo infrastructure, in accordance with the GNSS regulation and the EU procurement rules (Delegation Agreement signed on 19 December 2008); established the main management interfaces in the management and execution of the Galileo programme activities subject to the Delegation Agreement, in a Programme Management Plan developed with ESA; launched the competitive tendering procedure for the procurement of the Galileo infrastructure , divided into six work packages, in July 2008; provided to ESA, by means of a grant agreement, the funds necessary to cover the cost overruns incurred by ESA during the In-Orbit Validation phase (IOV). Main challenges in 2009 : the focus of activities in 2009 will be on concluding the FOC procurement, signing the service contract for EGNOS, launching preparatory studies for the post-2013 phase of Galileo and publishing the Galileo applications action plan. Further key activities in 2009 will be the revision of the GSA Regulation, the revision of the international cooperation strategy and a range of general measures, including risk management, technical consultancy and communications. Many of these activities are crucial for both Galileo and EGNOS, and challenges in certain areas such as IOV cost overruns and FOC procurement, therefore need to be prepared for. Work on full EGNOS coverage in Europe, and on an extension beyond European territory, notably into Africa, also remains an important activity in 2009. The main challenge for the international activities of the GNSS Programmes in 2009 will be to ensure the compatibility and interoperability with Galileo, to access global GNSS-related resources and set worldwide standards, to ensure security of the space segment and network of ground stations, while ensuring a stricter control of sensitive GNSS technologies developed with European funding, to join in an international effort to develop innovative applications and specialised applications of supra-regional interest. An important objective will be to create market opportunities for the European GNSS technology and applications industries. Cooperation with China will undergo a major test at the next steering committee, jointly set as a key milestone to assess the progress made in the 2008/2009 timeframe on the critical issue of COMPASS/Galileo compatibility. The European side expects positive reactions on the proposals made by the experts. If the problem is not solved promptly, it cannot be excluded that the cooperation with China will get a major reshaping. Funding : Community funding will furthermore cover activities relating to the completion of the Galileo IOV phase as well as the cost for operating EGNOS and preparatory activities in relation to the exploitation of the programmes. The total amount earmarked for these activities is EUR 3405 million, including EUR 400 million made available from the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development, the EU's main instrument for funding research in Europe for the period 2007-2013. If appropriate, the Commission will, in accordance with the Regulation, pre pare and present, in 2010, a proposal covering the public funds and commitments needed for the financing programming period starting in 2014 , and will present scenarios for the exploitation of the Galileo system. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2011-01-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0005/COM_COM(2011)0005_EN.doc title: COM(2011)0005 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=5 title: EUR-Lex summary: In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 683/2008, the Commission presents a report constituting the annual report and mid-term review of the European satellite radio navigation programmes . It takes stock of the progress made on the programmes and sets out the challenges ahead. 1) The development of programmes since 2007: when the Commission took over responsibility for managing the Galileo and EGNOS programmes in 2008, they were experiencing significant cost overruns and delays, as well as serious governance problems. Significant progress has been made over the last three years: the EGNOS open service officially became operational on 1 October 2009. The system has operated since then in accordance with the requisite specifications. It is operated by a service provider (hereinafter 'ESSP') under contract to the Commission. The main subject of the contract is the uninterrupted provision of the open service and of the safety-of-life ('SoL') service. A milestone was reached in July 2010 with the certification of ESSP under the regulations governing the single European sky. The period for finalising the EGNOS system should be completed in the near future and the SoL service for the needs of civil aviation should be declared open in early 2011. In addition, it is planned to extend the area covered by EGNOS services gradually to include all the countries belonging to the European Civil Aviation Conference. Studies are also continuing into extending coverage into Africa, the Arab countries and the countries immediately to the east of the EU. Where the development phase is concerned, the two experimental satellites, Giove A and Giove B, are operating very satisfactorily. In addition, the assembly of the first four satellites in the future constellation, which will be launched in 2011-2012, as ESA has confirmed, is currently being completed. Work on the deployment phase was launched in 2008 and is proceeding actively. This work has been divided up essentially into six packages, each of which is the subject of a public procurement procedure. Competitive dialogue with the tendering firms is a key element in the procedures which have been launched. As a result, the first four contracts, with a total value of around EUR 1 250 million , were awarded in 2010; they are for the packages covering system engineering support, satellite construction ( with an initial order for 14 satellites ), launchers (for the launch of 10 satellites, but with options for additional launches) and operations, respectively. The other two packages, relating to ground infrastructure, will be awarded in 2011. The contracts for additional equipment and facilities will also need to be awarded in the course of 2011. For those contracts where there was competitive supply, savings have been possible with respect to original estimates, whereas this was not the case in monopoly situations. Horizontal measures: the report discusses several horizontal measures flanking the deployment of the infrastructure, which have been taken on the regulatory front, with regard to international aspects and in respect of future uses. These include the compatibility and interoperability of the systems , which are the focus of complex discussions with China, the United States, Russia, India and Japan, and also within the United Nations. Where the development of downstream markets is concerned, in June 2010, the Commission adopted a GNSS Applications Action Plan to promote the use of satellite radio navigation in what it considers to be priority fields. 2) New challenges: However, the programmes are now faced with fresh challenges arising from the materialisation of a number of risks which were previously identified by the Commission, and the organisation of the programmes must be further fine-tuned in order to increase their efficiency. The project has experienced cost overruns attributable in particular to the increased cost of the development phase, the increased price of the launchers, the lack of competition for the award of some packages and additional costs associated with the programme. The report notes that the additional cost of the development phase amounts to some EUR 500 million in total. The price of launch services has entailed an additional cost of more than EUR 500 million by comparison with the original budget. The assessment shows that average annual operating costs amount to some EUR 800 million at 2010 prices, not adjusted for inflation, of which EUR 110 million is accounted for by EGNOS. The estimates made to date point to a requirement for around EUR 1 900 million in funding over the period 2014-2019 to complete the infrastructure associated with the Galileo programme. Added to this will be the operating costs of the system once it has become operational, i.e. as from 2014-2015. Furthermore, the economic situation of the EU and its Member States has led the Commission not to seek, up to now, the allocation of additional resources within the current multiannual financial framework, even though this is causing delays in completion of the full deployment of Galileo and an increase in overall costs. A new basis for the work on the European satellite radio navigation programmes needs to be established so that progress can continue without compromising the objectives laid down by the European Parliament and Council. Accordingly, the Commission recommends an approach which envisages the present organisation being maintained and improved over at least 10 years, although it will have to evolve in line with the needs of the exploitation phase. On the political front , several decisions still need to be taken. In a context in which Europe's economic and social progress is heavily dependent on mastering and using leading-edge technologies such as those relating to nuclear fusion, space, air traffic management and life sciences, it is important to reach decisions about the means, including budgetary means, of coping with the risks inherent in such technologies. Conclusions also need to be reached on the development of the EU budget and on how the risks are to be apportioned between the EU and its Member States. The decisions laying down the budgetary and financial principles governing the continuation of the European satellite radio navigation programmes will need to be taken in parallel with those concerning the governance framework. This must seek to make all the players more aware of their responsibilities, in order to ensure an orderly transition to future governance arrangements while at the same time enhancing control of the project and of its associated costs. The adoption of such political decisions requires time and thought. Detailed proposals will be drawn up by the Commission at a later stage on the basis of the guidelines to be laid down by the European Parliament and the Council in the light of this report. type: Follow-up document body: EC
events
  • date: 2004-07-14T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0477/COM_COM(2004)0477_FR.pdf title: COM(2004)0477 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=477 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE : to define the modalities of the financial contribution of the Community for the implementation of the deployment and commercial operating phases of the European satellite radionavigation GALILEO. PROPOSED ACT : Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council. CONTENT : the GALILEO programme has now reached an advanced stage of maturity and goes well beyond the framework of a simple research project. It is necessary to place it on a specific legal tool, better able to satisfy its needs and respond to the requirement for good financial management. As a result, a Community Regulation is necessary to enable the implementation of the deployment and the commercial operating phases of the programme. During the deployment and the commercial operating phases, the construction and then the management of the system will be entrusted to a private concessionaire working under the control of the Supervisory Authority. The missions of the Supervisory Authority include managing the public funds allocated to the European Satellite radionavigation programme as well as following the financial management of this programme so as to optimise the use of public money. In addition, the Supervisory Authority carries out budgetary responsibilities given to it by the Commission. In order to ensure the continuation of the programme, the Commission must secure the financing of the deployment and commercial operating phases which will in particular include a Community contribution. The Community contribution to the programme allocated by this Regulation is granted with the aim of co-financing: - activities related to the deployment phase, covering the construction and the launch of satellites as well as the complete setting up of the terrestrial infrastructure; - the first series of activities related to the launch of the commercial operating phase, covering the management of the infrastructure composed by satellites and the associated ground stations, as well as the maintenance and updating of the system. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS : - Budget line : specific Galileo Programme budget line; - Period of allocation : 2007-2013; - total allocation of the action : EUR 1 billion. This amount will be transferred to the Supervisory Authority. The annual appropriations are authorised by the Budgetary Authority within the limits of the financial perspectives.
  • date: 2004-10-07T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2607*&MEET_DATE=07/10/2004 title: 2607
  • date: 2004-11-16T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-04-21T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2654*&MEET_DATE=21/04/2005 title: 2654 summary: Following the agreement it had already reached in December 2004, the Council formalised a partial general approach concerning the proposal for a Regulation on the implementation of the deployment and commercial operating phases of the European satellite radio navigation programme, before taking a final decision at the close of the discussions on the future financial perspective 2007-2013.
  • date: 2005-06-21T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the report by Etelka BARSI-PATAKY (EPP-ED, HU) broadly approving the proposal under the 1st reading of the codecision procedure, subject to a number of amendments: - it was important to specify the time-frame for the different phases of the programme, i.e. the deployment phase (2006-2010) and the commercial operating phase (2008 onwards); - it should be made clear that the figure of EUR 1 billion for the financial framework was indicative, pending a decision on the financial perspective. Moreover, the reference amount should be set at 2004 prices; - taking into account the specific nature of the programme, especially the fact that it was a public-private partnership, the Community would probably have to give financial guarantees in excess of the budgetary allocation. These commitments should therefore be subject to budgetary approval by Parliament and Council; - since the programme could prove lucrative, a profit-sharing mechanism should be set up to enable the Community contribution to be repaid; - ownership of the Intellectual Property Rights and licences should stay with the Supervisory Authority, but the revenues generated by the exploitation of these rights could form the income of the concession holder; - Parliament should have observer status on the Administrative Board of the Supervisory Authority; - the amount of each annual subsidy should be decided in the framework of the EU budgetary procedure and not on the basis of the work programme of the Supervisory Authority, as stated in the proposal; - to enable Parliament to monitor the implementation of the programme and fulfil its budgetary role, the Commission should report to Parliament and Council every year on the implementation of the programme, when presenting the preliminary draft budget, and a mid-term review should be carried out in 2007.
  • date: 2005-06-22T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-07-04T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-212&language=EN title: A6-0212/2005
  • date: 2005-09-05T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050905&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-09-06T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-313 title: T6-0313/2005 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Etelka BARSI-PATAKY (EPP-ED, HU) making some amendments to the Commission’s proposal. The principal amendment envisages a profit-sharing mechanism to permit the refunding of the EU’s contribution to the two phases, in view of the anticipated profits from the programme’s commercial operation. The amendments in the report are as follows: -the Regulation concerns the ‘programmes’, referring to the GALILEO and EGNOS programmes. EGNOS is a programme aiming at augmenting the American GPS and Russian GLONASS signals for reliability purposes across a broad geographical area. It is independent from and complementary to GALILEO; -Parliament specified the time-frame for the different phases of the programme, i.e. the deployment phase (2006-2010) and the commercial operating phase (2008 onwards); - the figure of EUR 1 billion for the financial framework is indicative, pending a decision on the financial perspective. -in cases where financial guarantees in excess of the budgetary allocation are to be undertaken by the Community either directly or indirectly, including the concession contract, they must be subject to approval by the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with the applicable budgetary rules; - in cases where liability commitments in excess of the budgetary allocation are to be undertaken by the Community either directly or indirectly, including the concession contract, they must also be subject to approval by the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with the applicable budgetary rules; - a profit-sharing mechanism will be established in order to ensure the repayment of the Community contribution to the deployment and commercial operating phases. - the concession holder will be entitled to receive the revenues deriving from the exploitation of licences and intellectual property rights for system components, ownership of which should rest with the Supervisory Authority; - taking into account the specific nature of the programmes, the European Parliament, in order to be able to fulfil its budgetary role, will have observer status on the Administrative Board of the Supervisory Authority; - the amount of each annual subsidy shall be decided in the framework of the EU budgetary procedure, and not on determined on the basis of the work programme of the Supervisory Authority; -finally, every year, upon presentation of the preliminary draft budget, the Commission will present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the programmes. In 2007, a mid-term review shall be carried out in order to inform the European Parliament and the Council of the progress reached by that time.
  • date: 2006-05-24T00:00:00 type: Modified legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=[%n] title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2004)0477/2
  • date: 2006-06-08T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2735*&MEET_DATE=08/06/2006 title: 2735
  • date: 2007-07-10T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2813*&MEET_DATE=10/07/2007 title: 2813 summary: The Council held an exchange of views on the possible additional public financing of Galileo, the EU's global satellite navigation system. Several delegations expressed opposition to any modification of the EU's current financial framework as a means of providing additional funding. The Transport, Telecommunications and Energy Council, at its meeting on 6-8 June, requested detailed alternative proposals for the financing of Galileo. The Commission is expected to present in September a proposal for continued management of the project. Galileo, launched in 2001, has accumulated a delay of five years on its initial calendar and is currently facing a number of difficulties, in particular with regard to industrial governance and the transfer of risk to the private sector. Without prejudice to decisions to be taken in the autumn, the Transport Council expressed support for deployment of the Galileo system by the end of 2012 and recognised that this would require additional public funding.
  • date: 2007-09-19T00:00:00 type: Formal reconsultation of Parliament body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2007-09-19T00:00:00 type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0535/COM_COM(2007)0535_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0535 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=535 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to present an amended proposal by the Commission on the further implementation of the European satellite radionavigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo). BACKGROUND: - 14 July 2004 : the Commission adopted a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the implementation of the deployment and commercial operating phases of the European programme of satellite radionavigation. - 21 April 2005 : the Council reached an agreement (partial general approach) on the Commission's proposal for a Regulation, with the exception of the budgetary details, with final approval dependant on the outcome of the debate on the 2007-13 financial framework. The main amendment introduced by the Council was to include the EGNOS programme in the proposed Regulation. - 5 September 2005 : Parliament also examined the text at first reading and gave a generally very positive opinion of it. Like the Council it wished to see the EGNOS programme included in the proposed Regulation. - 22 March 2007 : in the light of the difficulties that arose in the negotiations on the concession contract, the Transport Council asked the Commission: i) to assess all progress made regarding the Galileo project; ii) to propose, as soon as possible, ways of guaranteeing the public financial commitments in the long term; iii) to provide for a scenario for making EGNOS satellite navigation services available in the short term; iv) to assess the progress of the concession contract negotiations and to suggest detailed alternative scenarios (see RSP/2006/2629 ). - 26 April 2007 : the European Parliament made a similar request in its Resolution on the Galileo concession contract negotiations, in particular to improve the public management of the programme by ensuring clear political responsibility and the Commission's leadership role (see RSP/2007/2548 ). - 16 May 2007 : the Commission responded to the requests made by Parliament and the Council in a Communication (see also RSP/2007/2548 ). Firstly, it invited them to take note of the failure of the negotiations on the concession contract, to reaffirm the necessity to put in place an autonomous satellite navigation system and to recognise that, in this respect, the characteristics of the Galileo system remain fully compatible with the ambitions of the European Union. - 8 June 2007 : the Council adopted a Resolution in which it largely agreed to the Commission's proposals. In particular, the Council: i) concluded that the concession contract negotiations had failed and should be ended; ii) invited the Commission to continue with the implementation of a certifiable EGNOS, with the initial service available by 2008; iii) reaffirmed the value of Galileo as a key project of the European Union and supported the deployment of the Galileo system by the end of 2012; iv) recognised that the implementation of a deployment of Galileo and EGNOS by the public sector would need additional public funding; v) requested the Commission to submit to it by September 2007 detailed proposals for financing, proposals for an implementation and procurement strategy which will have to reflect progress made so far as well as the need for competition, concepts for the role of the private sector in the commercial operating phase, and proposals for a sound public-sector management structure of the programme on the basis of a clear division of responsibilities between the Commission, the European Space Agency, the European GNSS Supervisory Authority, Member States and the Council. - 20 June 2007 : in its Resolution on the financing of Galileo, Parliament supported the proposals put forward by the Commission in its Communication of 16 May 2007, in particular regarding Community financing for the programmes and the need to improve public governance of them. CONTENT: in the light of the changes in the course of the Galileo programme since the start of 2007, in particular the fact that the European Community will now assume direct responsibility for the deployment of the system and the resulting additional cost of EUR 2 100 million for the Community budget during the 2007-2013 financial framework, it is necessary to amend the initial proposal for a Regulation. The proposals put forward by the Commission to amend its initial proposal for a Regulation reflect the abandonment of the concession plan for the deployment phase, as well as the various comments made by Parliament and the Council: 1) the amended text now fully incorporates the EGNOS programme . It identifies it, alongside Galileo, as one of the two pillars of European satellite radionavigation policy. Both systems and programmes are also clearly defined: a) the EGNOS system is an infrastructure using signals emitted, initially, by the American GPS and the Russian GLONASS systems. It increases their reliability over a geographical area mainly covering Europe; b) the system established under the Galileo programme is an autonomous GNSS infrastructure consisting of a constellation of satellites and earth stations. 2) the proposed text reflects the abandonment of the concession plan for the deployment phase of the Galileo programme and the fact that all aspects of this phase will be undertaken by the European Community . The budgetary resources needed to finance the two programmes between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2013 are now EUR 3 405 million . EUR 1 005 million is already foreseen in the existing financial programming (2007-13) under the Commission's proposed legislation for the implementation of the deployment and commercial operating phases of the Galileo programme. It is proposed to increase the above figure by an additional EUR 2 100 million the allocation of which will be subject to a review of the current financial framework (2007-13). The funds are provided from unused margins in headings 2 and 5 for 2007 and 2008. As a result, the text of the amended proposal shall stipulate that the Community budget for 2007-13 foresee EUR 3 105 million for the European GNSS programmes. A sum of EUR 300 million , which is available for the European GNSS programmes under the Seventh Research and Development Framework Programme, will help cover these costs. This amount also covers costs linked to the delays in the development phase of the Galileo programme, which will only be completed in 2010. Lastly, recent studies carried out by the Commission conclude that the Galileo system is likely to be deployed in mid-2013. 3) the text allows the commercial operation of the EGNOS system from 2009 , with a one-year delay due to ongoing pre-qualification work. 4) the proposed text aims to improve the public governance of the programmes : halting the concession contract negotiations left a legal vacuum regarding the role of the Supervisory Authority during the deployment and commercial operating phases of the Galileo programme, as the tasks assigned to the Authority under Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 mainly entailed selecting a concession holder. The Commission must therefore put forward a proposal amending Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 once the European Union has adopted the necessary political decisions, in order to ensure a solid and coherent framework for the public governance of the programmes. Nevertheless, several measures can already be taken. The proposed text strengthens public governance in two ways: a) by providing for a strict division of responsibilities between the European Community, represented by the Commission, the European GNSS Supervisory Authority and the European Space Agency, and by conferring the implementation of the programmes upon the Commission. The European GNSS Supervisory Authority will, in addition to its core role of facilitating the introduction of the services offered by the systems on commercial markets, assist the Commission in all matters linked to the implementation of the programmes. Technical aspects are the responsibility of the European Space Agency. Contracts concluded by the Agency must comply with relevant Community rules on public contracts; b) by providing for the setting up of the Committee on European GNSS Programmes, which will help the Commission implement this Regulation and ensure the uniform management of the programmes, faster decision-making and equal access to information. The implementation of these programmes must be accompanied by the establishment of the appropriate components and resources. Amongst other things, the tasks which were to be undertaken by the concession holder must now be carried out by the Commission, with the help of independent experts, experts from the Member States and a specialised team.
  • date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2822*&MEET_DATE=09/10/2007 title: 2822
  • date: 2008-04-07T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2861*&MEET_DATE=07/04/2008 title: 2861 summary: The Council reached a general approach on an amended proposal for a Regulation on the further implementation of the European satellite radio navigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo), which constitute a key project for the European Union. The agreed text is the result of work carried out within the Council's bodies and of the presidency's informal negotiations with the European Parliament. On this basis, the European Parliament will adopt its first-reading opinion at its April or May session. This amended proposal constitutes the legal basis for the budgetary implementation of the programmes during the current financial period 2007-2013. It therefore needs to be finalised as quickly as possible and adopted by both institutions in the framework of the codecision procedure. Due to significant changes in the course of the programme, the draft regulation provides for a series of amendments to the Commission's initial proposal, taking into account the abandonment of the concession scheme for the deployment phase in particular. The main modifications are the following: the European Community will assume responsibility for the deployment of the system; budgetary resources needed to finance both programmes for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013 are set at EUR 3.4 billion; the EGNOS programme is included in the regulation as one of the two pillars of European satellite radio navigation policy and the EGNOS system should be declared operational as soon as possible ; the public governance of the programme is strengthened by strictly defining the responsibilities of the European Community (represented by the Commission), the European GNSS Supervisory Authority and the European Space Agency, and by declaring the Commission responsible for the management of the programme. Further modifications in the text agreed by the ministers are the result of the negotiations with the European Parliament. They concern the following issues in particular: the role of the European GNSS Supervisory Authority: the GSA will ensure the security accreditation of the system and the operation of the Galileo security centre, and contribute to the preparation of the commercialisation of the systems. In addition, the GSA will also be able to accomplish other tasks entrusted to it by the Commission, in particular the promotion of applications and services and ensuring the certification of the components of the systems; the Galileo Interinstitutional Panel: the European Parliament, the Council, and the European Commission agreed to meet in the GIP, which will follow the progress on the implementation of the programmes in particular, and its main purpose will be to ensure a comprehensive exchange of information. The GIP will be composed of three representatives from the Council, three from the European Parliament and one from the Commission and will meet, in principle, four times a year; comitology issues: in the framework of the comitology procedure, in particular the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, the institutions agreed on a balanced solution providing for further involvement of the European Parliament. The Commission will present an annual report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of the programmes. A mid-term review of the programmes will be carried out in 2010. In particular, it will include a review of costs, risks and likely revenues from the services offered by Galileo.
  • date: 2008-04-08T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted a report drafted by Etelka BARSI-PATAKY (EPP-ED, HU), and made some amendments to the amended proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the further implementation of the European satellite radio-navigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo). The text adopted in Committee was the result of a compromise negotiated with the Council in informal meetings. The amended regulation contains several modifications requested by Parliament and asks the European Commission to lay down the main technical requirements for controlling access to the technologies that provide security to Galileo and EGNOS. The main amendments are as follows: Phases of Galileo : the text stipulates that the development and validation phase should end in 2010. The deployment phase should run from 2008 to 2013. It shall include preparations for the exploitation phase. The exploitation phase is set to begin at the latest upon conclusion of the deployment phase. Budget and financing : the European Parliament and the Council decided that the total estimated amount for costs for operating the Galileo and EGNOS systems for the period 2007-13 is EUR 3 405 million at current prices. EUR 1 005 million was already foreseen in the existing financial programming (2007-13). This amount has been increased by an additional EUR 2 000 million through a review of the current financial framework (2007-13). Furthermore, a sum of EUR 400 million is made available from the 7th RDFP. The Commission is invited, in 2010, together with its mid-term review, to submit a proposal for the financing programming period starting in 2014 on the public funds and commitments, including any obligation needed for the exploitation phase, deriving from its responsibility relating to the public ownership of the system, and objectives for a pricing policy ensuring that costumer receive high quality services at fair prices and the revenue-sharing mechanism needed for the exploitation phase. It shall, in particular, include a reasoned feasibility study of the advantages and disadvantages of the use of service concession contracts or public service contracts with the private sector. Member States may provide additional funding to the programme to cover the investment of the evolution to the agreed system architecture in particular cases. Third countries or international organisations may also provide additional funding to the programme. Compatibility and interoperability of the systems : the Commission shall make every effort to ensure the compatibility and interoperability of the systems, networks and services of EGNOS and Galileo and shall pursue the benefits of compatibility and interoperability of EGNOS and Galileo with other navigation systems and where possible with conventional navigation means. General framework for governance of the programmes : the Commission, assisted by the Committee, shall be responsible for the management of the programmes, which it shall conduct in a transparent manner. It shall avoid duplication of structures and functions, through a clear division of tasks with the GSA and ESA. The Commission must establish the appropriate instruments, including the implementation of an integrated Galileo programme risk management at all levels of the programme as well as structural measures to identify, control, mitigate and monitor risks, and ensure it possesses the resources needed to accomplish this task. Governance of security matters : Member States should adopt national security regulations that guarantee at least the same level of protection for EU classified information on the two programmes as is required for the industrial security of EURATOM. If the operation of the systems should pose a risk to the security of the EU or Member States, joint action should be taken under the Common Foreign and Security Policy. The text states that whenever the security of the EU or its Member States may be affected by the operation of the systems as foreseen by the Joint Action 2004/552/CFSP, the procedures of the Joint Action shall apply. Matters falling exclusively within Title V and/or Title VI of the TEU will not be within the remit of the European GNSS Programmes Committee. Application of security regulations : Member States must apply to any person or legal entity established on their territory, which are dealing with EU classified information regarding the programmes, security regulations ensuring a degree of protection at least equivalent to that guaranteed by the rules on security of the Commission stipulated in the Annex to Commission Decision 2001/844/EC, and by the security regulations of the Council in the Annex to the Council Decision 2001/264/EC. The role of the European GNSS Supervisory Authority (GSA): following criticism that the role of the GSA was not clearly set out in the Commission proposal for the deployment phase, the GSA's tasks are revised. The GSA will now monitor the implementation of security procedures and perform system security audits. The Commission is asked formally to align the structures for the programmes' management with the GSA's new role. The GSA shall accomplish certain prescribed tasks within the programmes in accordance with guidelines issued by the Commission: (a) on programmes' security it must ensure security accreditation, and operation of the Galileo security centre; (b) it shall contribute to the preparation of the commercialisation of the systems, including the necessary market analysis; (c) other tasks entrusted to it by the Commission. Procurement principles related to the deployment phase of Galileo : the Community's public procurement rules will apply to the deployment phase of Galileo without prejudice to measures required to protect the essential interests of the security of the EC or public security or to comply with EU export control requirements. During the procurement, the following objectives shall be pursued: (a) promoting a balanced participation of industry at all levels, including in particular SME, across the Member States; (b) avoiding possible abuse of dominance or long-term dependence on single suppliers; (c) taking advantage of prior public sector investments and lessons learned as well as industrial experience and competences, including that acquired in the definition and development phases of the European GNSS programmes, while ensuring that competitive tendering shall not be prejudiced. To that end, certain principles for the procurement of the activities of the deployment phase of Galileo will apply: (a) split of the procurement of the infrastructure into a set of six main work packages (system engineering support, ground mission infrastructure completion, ground control infrastructure completion, satellites, launchers and operations) as well as a number of additional work packages, through a comprehensive overall procurement break-down; this does not rule out the prospect of multiple simultaneous procurement strands for individual work packages, including of satellites; (b) competitive tendering of all packages and, for the six main work packages, the use of a single procedure whereby any one independent legal entity may bid for the role of prime contractor for a maximum of two of the six main work packages; (c) at least 40 % of the aggregated value of the activities to be subcontracted by competitive tendering at various levels to companies other than those belonging to the groups of which entities will be prime contractors of any of the main work packages. In case projections show the possibility that 40 % cannot be attained, the Commission shall take appropriate measures; (d)dual sourcing wherever appropriate in order to ensure better overall control of programme, cost and schedule. Protection of personal data and privacy : the Commission shall ensure that protection of personal data and privacy is guaranteed and integrated into the technical structures of the systems. Galileo Inter-institutional Panel : given the uniqueness of the programmes and the Community's ownership of the satellite radio navigation systems, Parliament, Council and Commission agreed to set up a new inter-institutional framework, the Galileo Inter-institutional Panel (GIP) which will be composed of three representatives each of the Council and the Parliament, and one representative of the Commission. The GIP will follow the implementation of the GNSS programmes, the international agreements with third countries, the preparation of the satellite navigation markets, the effectiveness of the governance arrangements, and the annual review of the work programme.
  • date: 2008-04-10T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-144&language=EN title: A6-0144/2008
  • date: 2008-04-22T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080422&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-04-23T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14883&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-04-23T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-167 title: T6-0167/2008 summary: The European Parliament adopted, with 607 votes to 36 against with 6 abstentions, a legislative resolution making some amendments to the amended proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the further implementation of the European satellite radio-navigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo). The report was tabled for consideration in plenary by Etelka BARSI-PATAKY (EPP-ED, HU), on behalf of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy. The text adopted was the result of a compromise negotiated with the Council in informal meetings. The amended regulation contains several modifications requested by Parliament and asks the European Commission to lay down the main technical requirements for controlling access to the technologies that provide security to Galileo and EGNOS. The main amendments - adopted in the 1 st reading of the codecision procedure - are as follows: Phases of Galileo : the text stipulates that the development and validation phase should end in 2010. The deployment phase shall run from 2008 to 2013, and include preparations for the exploitation phase. The exploitation phase is set to begin at the latest upon conclusion of the deployment phase. Budget and financing : the European Parliament and the Council decided that the total estimated amount for costs for operating the Galileo and EGNOS systems for the period 2007-13 is EUR 3 405 million at current prices. EUR 1 005 million was already foreseen in the existing financial programming (2007-13). This amount has been increased by an additional EUR 2 000 million through a review of the current financial framework (2007-13). Furthermore, a sum of EUR 400 million is made available from the 7th RDFP. The Commission is invited, in 2010, together with its mid-term review, to submit a proposal for the financing programming period starting in 2014 on the public funds and commitments, including any obligation needed for the exploitation phase, deriving from its responsibility relating to the public ownership of the system, and objectives for a pricing policy ensuring that costumer receive high quality services at fair prices and the revenue-sharing mechanism needed for the exploitation phase. It shall, in particular, include a reasoned feasibility study of the advantages and disadvantages of the use of service concession contracts or public service contracts with the private sector. Member States may provide additional funding to the programme to cover the investment of the evolution to the agreed system architecture in particular cases. Third countries or international organisations may also provide additional funding to the programme. Compatibility and interoperability of the systems : the Commission shall make every effort to ensure the compatibility and interoperability of the systems, networks and services of EGNOS and Galileo and shall pursue the benefits of compatibility and interoperability of EGNOS and Galileo with other navigation systems and where possible with conventional navigation means. General framework for governance of the programmes : the Commission, assisted by the Committee, shall be responsible for the management of the programmes, which it shall conduct in a transparent manner. It shall avoid duplication of structures and functions, through a clear division of tasks with the GSA and ESA. The Commission must establish the appropriate instruments, including the implementation of an integrated Galileo programme risk management at all levels of the programme as well as structural measures to identify, control, mitigate and monitor risks, and ensure it possesses the resources needed to accomplish this task. Governance of security matters : Member States should adopt national security regulations that guarantee at least the same level of protection for EU classified information on the two programmes as is required for the industrial security of EURATOM. If the operation of the systems should pose a risk to the security of the EU or Member States, joint action should be taken under the Common Foreign and Security Policy. The text states that whenever the security of the EU or its Member States may be affected by the operation of the systems as foreseen by the Joint Action 2004/552/CFSP, the procedures of the Joint Action shall apply. Matters falling exclusively within Title V and/or Title VI of the TEU will not be within the remit of the European GNSS Programmes Committee. Application of security regulations : Member States must apply to any person or legal entity established on their territory, which are dealing with EU classified information regarding the programmes, security regulations ensuring a degree of protection at least equivalent to that guaranteed by the rules on security of the Commission stipulated in the Annex to Commission Decision 2001/844/EC, and by the security regulations of the Council in the Annex to the Council Decision 2001/264/EC. The role of the European GNSS Supervisory Authority (GSA): following criticism that the role of the GSA was not clearly set out in the Commission proposal for the deployment phase, the GSA's tasks are revised. The GSA will now monitor the implementation of security procedures and perform system security audits. The Commission is asked formally to align the structures for the programmes' management with the GSA's new role. The GSA shall accomplish certain prescribed tasks within the programmes in accordance with guidelines issued by the Commission: (a) on programmes' security it must ensure security accreditation, and operation of the Galileo security centre; (b) it shall contribute to the preparation of the commercialisation of the systems, including the necessary market analysis; (c) other tasks entrusted to it by the Commission. Procurement principles related to the deployment phase of Galileo : the Community's public procurement rules will apply to the deployment phase of Galileo without prejudice to measures required to protect the essential interests of the security of the EC or public security or to comply with EU export control requirements. During the procurement, the following objectives shall be pursued: (a) promoting a balanced participation of industry at all levels, including in particular SME, across the Member States; (b) avoiding possible abuse of dominance or long-term dependence on single suppliers; (c) taking advantage of prior public sector investments and lessons learned as well as industrial experience and competences, including that acquired in the definition and development phases of the European GNSS programmes, while ensuring that competitive tendering shall not be prejudiced. To that end, certain principles for the procurement of the activities of the deployment phase of Galileo will apply: (a) split of the procurement of the infrastructure into a set of six main work packages (system engineering support, ground mission infrastructure completion, ground control infrastructure completion, satellites, launchers and operations) as well as a number of additional work packages, through a comprehensive overall procurement break-down; this does not rule out the prospect of multiple simultaneous procurement strands for individual work packages, including of satellites; (b) competitive tendering of all packages and, for the six main work packages, the use of a single procedure whereby any one independent legal entity may bid for the role of prime contractor for a maximum of two of the six main work packages; (c) at least 40 % of the aggregated value of the activities to be subcontracted by competitive tendering at various levels to companies other than those belonging to the groups of which entities will be prime contractors of any of the main work packages. In case projections show the possibility that 40 % cannot be attained, the Commission shall take appropriate measures; (d) dual sourcing wherever appropriate in order to ensure better overall control of programme, cost and schedule. Protection of personal data and privacy : the Commission shall ensure that protection of personal data and privacy is guaranteed and integrated into the technical structures of the systems. Galileo Inter-institutional Panel : given the uniqueness of the programmes and the Community's ownership of the satellite radio navigation systems, Parliament, Council and Commission agreed to set up a new inter-institutional framework, the Galileo Inter-institutional Panel (GIP) which will be composed of three representatives each of the Council and the Parliament, and one representative of the Commission. The GIP will follow the implementation of the GNSS programmes, the international agreements with third countries, the preparation of the satellite navigation markets, the effectiveness of the governance arrangements, and the annual review of the work programme.
  • date: 2008-07-03T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2008-07-09T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL
  • date: 2008-07-09T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2008-07-24T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to lay down the rules for the further implementation of the EGNOS and GALILEO programmes, including those on governance and the financial contribution of the Community. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the further implementation of the European satellite navigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo). CONTENT: this Regulation describes the further implementation of the Community’s two satellite navigation systems, established under the EGNOS and Galileo programmes. Each infrastructure is made up of satellites and a network of earth stations. Galileo : the aim of the Galileo programme is to establish the first global satellite navigation and positioning infrastructure specifically designed for civilian purposes. The system established under the Galileo programme is completely independent of other existing or potential systems. The phases of the Galileo programme : these are the following : (a) a definition phase during which the structure of the system was designed and its elements determined, which ended in 2001; (b) a development and validation phase, comprising the construction and launch of the first satellites, the establishment of the first ground-based infrastructures and all the work and operations necessary to validate the system in orbit. The aim is that this phase shall end in 2010; (c) a deployment phase consisting of the establishment of all the space and ground-based infrastructures as well as related operations. The aim is that this phase shall run from 2008 to 2013. It shall include preparations for the exploitation phase; (d) an exploitation phase comprising infrastructure management, the maintenance, constant improvement and renewal of the system, certification and standardisation operations relating to the programme, the marketing of the system and all other activities needed to develop the system and ensure that the programme runs smoothly. The exploitation phase is set to begin at the latest upon conclusion of the deployment phase. Financing the Galileo programme : the definition phase and the development and validation phase of the Galileo programme, which are the phases of the programme dedicated to research, have been financed substantially by the Community budget for trans-European networks and by the European Space Agency (ESA). The deployment phase should, in principle, be financed entirely by the Community . It may be decided at a later stage that public-private partnerships or any other form of contract with private sector entities are appropriate for the operation, maintenance, improvement and renewal of the system after 2013. In 2010, the Commission shall submit, together with its mid-term review, a proposal concerning the public funds and commitments required for the financing programming period starting in 2014 , also covering any financial obligations with regard to the exploitation phase deriving from its responsibility relating to the public ownership of the system, the revenue-sharing mechanism for the exploitation phase, and objectives for a pricing policy ensuring that customers receive high quality services at fair prices. It shall, in particular, include a reasoned feasibility study of the advantages and disadvantages of the use of service concession contracts or public service contracts with private sector entities. Member States may provide additional funding to the Galileo programme to cover the investment necessary for the evolution to the agreed system architecture in particular cases. Third countries and international organisations may also provide additional funding to the Galileo programme. EGNOS : the aim of the EGNOS programme is to improve the quality of signals from existing global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). The operation of the EGNOS system shall consist primarily of infrastructure management, maintenance, constant improvement and renewal of the system, certification and standardisation operations relating to the programme, and marketing. Financing the operation of the EGNOS system : the Community shall finance the operation of EGNOS, without prejudice to any contribution from any other source. The operation of EGNOS will initially be the subject of one or more public service contracts. Member States may provide additional funding to the EGNOS programme. Third countries and international organisations may also provide additional funding to the EGNOS programme. Budgetary resources : The European Parliament and the Council have decided that the total estimated operating costs for the Galileo and EGNOS systems for the period 2007-2013 are EUR 3405 million . EUR 1005 million had originally been earmarked in the multiannual financial framework (2007 to 2013). This amount has been increased by EUR 2000 million. Furthermore, EUR 400 million has been made available through the Seventh Framework Programme (2007 to 2013), thus bringing the total available budget to EUR 3405 million for the programmes for the period 2007-2013. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 25/07/2008. docs: title: Regulation 2008/683 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32008R0683 title: OJ L 196 24.07.2008, p. 0001 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:196:SOM:EN:HTML
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ITRE/6/22742;ITRE/6/55020
New
  • ITRE/6/22742
  • ITRE/6/55020
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32008R0683
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32008R0683
procedure/instrument
Old
Regulation
New
  • Regulation
  • Amended by 2009/0047(COD) Repealed by 2011/0392(COD)
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.30.03.06 Communications by satellite
New
3.30.03.06
Communications by satellite
procedure/summary
  • Amended by
  • Repealed by
activities/12/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0535/COM_COM(2007)0535_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0535/COM_COM(2007)0535_EN.pdf
activities/23/docs/1/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:196:SOM:EN:HTML
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2008:196:TOC
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
activities/2/committees/5/rapporteur/0/mepref
545fc57fd1d1c5099c000000
activities/4/committees/5/rapporteur/0/mepref
545fc57fd1d1c5099c000000
activities/5/committees/5/rapporteur/0/mepref
545fc57fd1d1c5099c000000
activities/6/committees/5/rapporteur/0/mepref
545fc57fd1d1c5099c000000
activities/16/committees/5/rapporteur/0/mepref
545fc57fd1d1c5099c000000
activities/23/docs/1/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2008:196:TOC
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:196:SOM:EN:HTML
committees/5/rapporteur/0/mepref
545fc57fd1d1c5099c000000
activities
  • date: 2004-07-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0477/COM_COM(2004)0477_FR.pdf title: COM(2004)0477 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52004PC0477:EN body: EC type: Legislative proposal published commission: DG: Energy and Transport Commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2607 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2607*&MEET_DATE=07/10/2004 type: Debate in Council title: 2607 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2004-10-07T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2004-11-16T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2007-11-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SCHINAS Margaritis body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E. body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2004-08-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LOUIS Patrick
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2654 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2654*&MEET_DATE=21/04/2005 type: Debate in Council title: 2654 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2005-04-21T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2005-06-21T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2007-11-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SCHINAS Margaritis body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E. body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2004-08-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LOUIS Patrick type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2005-06-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2007-11-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SCHINAS Margaritis body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E. body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2004-08-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LOUIS Patrick
  • date: 2005-07-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-212&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0212/2005 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2007-11-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SCHINAS Margaritis body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E. body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2004-08-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LOUIS Patrick type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2005-09-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050905&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-09-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-313 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0313/2005 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-05-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=[%n] title: COM(2004)0477/2 type: Modified legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52004PC0477:EN body: EC type: Modified legislative proposal published commission: DG: Energy and Transport Commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2735 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2735*&MEET_DATE=08/06/2006 type: Debate in Council title: 2735 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2006-06-08T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2813 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2813*&MEET_DATE=10/07/2007 type: Debate in Council title: 2813 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2007-07-10T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2007-09-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0535/COM_COM(2007)0535_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0535 type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published celexid: CELEX:52007PC0535:EN body: EC type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published commission: DG: Energy and Transport Commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
  • date: 2007-09-19T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Formal reconsultation of Parliament
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2822 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2822*&MEET_DATE=09/10/2007 type: Debate in Council title: 2822 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2861 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2861*&MEET_DATE=07/04/2008 type: Debate in Council title: 2861 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2008-04-07T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2008-04-08T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2007-11-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SCHINAS Margaritis body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E. body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2004-08-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LOUIS Patrick type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-04-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-144&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation title: A6-0144/2008 body: unknown type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
  • date: 2008-04-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080422&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-04-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14883&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-167 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0167/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-07-03T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
  • date: 2008-07-09T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2008-07-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2008-07-24T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32008R0683 title: Regulation 2008/683 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2008:196:TOC title: OJ L 196 24.07.2008, p. 0001
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2007-11-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SCHINAS Margaritis
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEWANDOWSKI Janusz
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BARSI-PATAKY Etelka
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E.
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2004-08-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LOUIS Patrick
links
National parliaments
European Commission
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ITRE/6/22742;ITRE/6/55020
reference
2004/0156(COD)
subtype
Legislation
legal_basis
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 156
stage_reached
Procedure completed
summary
instrument
Regulation
title
Satellite navigation programmes EGNOS and Galileo: implementation of the deployment and commercial operating phases 2008-2013. GNSS Regulation
type
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
final
subject
3.30.03.06 Communications by satellite