BETA


2004/0171(CNS) European Communities' own resources: implementing measures for the correction of the budgetary imbalances

Progress: Procedure lapsed or withdrawn

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead BUDG LAMASSOURE Alain (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion REGI
Committee Opinion CONT MULDER Jan (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 279-p2, Euratom Treaty A 183

Events

2007/03/22
   all - Additional information
2005/05/12
   CofA - Court of Auditors: opinion, report
Details

On several occasions the Court has criticised the shortcomings of the system of own resources, which is very complex and presents numerous problems, in particular, regarding administration, consistency and lack of transparency.

The most important issues identified by the Court in its regard are as follows:

- In 2003, the traditional own resources amounted to 10 857,2 million euro after deduction of a flat-rate amount of 25 %, which was retained by the Member States to cover collection costs. The Court has already stated in its Opinion No 8/99 that collection costs actually constitute an item of expenditure and should be treated as such in the Community accounts and when calculating net balances.

- The capping of the VAT assessment base as a percentage of GNI has reduced the significance of the VAT resource in the financing of the budget. The VAT own resource decreased from 35 192,5 million euro (40,0 %) in 2000 to 21 260,1 million euro (25,4 %) in 2003. Capping also accentuated the resource’s macroeconomic character via its link with the GNI. The Court reaffirms its position that a resource based on the taxable consumption of citizens can only be justified if it is directly linked to a tax base.

- In addition, tax evasion, in particular ‘roundabout’ frauds facilitated by the current system with taxation taking place in the country of consumption, undeclared economic activity and the varying degrees of efficiency shown by the national authorities in collecting VAT and preventing fraud might still affect the incidence of the financial burden on the Member States.

- Furthermore, the results of Court audits cast some doubt on the accuracy and reliability of the VAT statements produced by the Member States, which are compiled after complicated calculations demanding significant administrative resources.

The GNI-based resource increased from 37 580,5 million euro (42,7 %) in 2000 to 51 235,2 million euro (61,3 %) in 2003, thus providing the largest share of the own resources. The Court has found that there is limited direct verification by the Commission of the underlying national accounts which provide the figures presented by the Member States in the GNI questionnaires as a basis for calculating the GNI-based resource. This is due to the ambiguity of the rules laying down the obligations and powers of the Commission in this respect.

None of the shortcomings described above are addressed in the Commission proposals. The Court stresses the need to deal with them.

Turning more specifically to the Commission’s proposal for a Council Regulation laying down the implementing measures for the correction of budgetary imbalances laid down in the Council Decision on the system of the Communities' own resources, the Court made the following specific remarks:

- in relation to Art 1 1(a), t he words ‘related to year t ’ should be added to the second indent in order to be consistent with the first indent.

- in relation to Art 2(2), A system with a maximum available refund volume (MARV), specified as a discretionary fixed amount of 7,5 billion euro, will not produce consistent results over time, as any GNI variation would affect the relative size of the corrections. Preservation of the ‘real value’ would require further Council agreement and negotiation. If there is a need for such a MARV, it could be expressed as a percentage of GNI.

- in relation to Art 4, traditional own resources constitute income under the EU budget and the collection costs should be treated as expenditure accruing to the Member States and included as allocated expenditure in the generalised correction mechanism. The references to ‘payments’, in Article 4(2) should be replaced by ‘expenditure’.

- also in relation to Art 4, the definition of expenditure to be excluded from total allocated expenditure, as formulated under the first and second indent of Article 4(2), is in the form of a negative but not exhaustive list allowing for differences from one year to another in the composition of the amount of allocated expenditure. In order to ensure that the amount of allocated expenditure is calculated annually in a consistent and transparent way, the Court suggests adding to this article a provision that the Commission should present a report each year on the allocation of expenditure, also covering expenditure that cannot be allocated to a Member State.

- in relation to Art 5 of the proposal, both the definitive calculation of the amount of the correction and its financing by Member States for the year t are based on data on VAT bases and GNI known at December of year t+2 . The Court considers it more appropriate to use VAT and GNI data for the year t+4 as they are then final.

2004/10/27
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2004/09/22
   EP - MULDER Jan (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2004/09/02
   EP - LAMASSOURE Alain (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2004/07/14
   EC - Legislative proposal
Details

PURPOSE : to lay down the implementing measures for the correction of budgetary imbalances laid down in the Council Decision on the system of the Communities' own resources (refer to CNS/2004/0170).

PROPOSED ACT : Council Regulation.

CONTENT: the proposed Council Decision of 14/07/2004 on the system of the European Communities' own resources calls for the correction for budgetary imbalances granted to the UK under Article 4 of Council Decision 2000/597/EC to be replaced with a generalised system for correcting excessive negative budgetary imbalances.

This draft Council Regulation shall lay down the implementing measures for the calculation of these corrections and their financing, in particular the threshold and the maximum available refund volume. In addition, it shall define the categories of expenditure and revenue to be taken into account for the calculation of the corrections. Lastly, it will lay down the rules for entering the corrections in the budget.

2004/07/13
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE : to lay down the implementing measures for the correction of budgetary imbalances laid down in the Council Decision on the system of the Communities' own resources (refer to CNS/2004/0170).

PROPOSED ACT : Council Regulation.

CONTENT: the proposed Council Decision of 14/07/2004 on the system of the European Communities' own resources calls for the correction for budgetary imbalances granted to the UK under Article 4 of Council Decision 2000/597/EC to be replaced with a generalised system for correcting excessive negative budgetary imbalances.

This draft Council Regulation shall lay down the implementing measures for the calculation of these corrections and their financing, in particular the threshold and the maximum available refund volume. In addition, it shall define the categories of expenditure and revenue to be taken into account for the calculation of the corrections. Lastly, it will lay down the rules for entering the corrections in the budget.

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2005-05-12T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Court of Auditors: opinion, report
body
CofA
docs/0
date
2004-07-14T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/1
date
2005-05-12T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Court of Auditors: opinion, report
body
CofA
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:167:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:167:TOC
events/0/date
Old
2004-07-14T00:00:00
New
2004-07-13T00:00:00
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:167:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:167:SOM:EN:HTML
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: LAMASSOURE Alain date: 2004-09-02T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2004-09-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LAMASSOURE Alain group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: MULDER Jan date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2004-09-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MULDER Jan group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
activities
  • date: 2004-07-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0501/COM_COM(2004)0501(COR1)_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0501 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52004PC0501(02):EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2004-10-27T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2004-09-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LAMASSOURE Alain body: EP responsible: False committee: CONT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • date: 2007-03-22T00:00:00 body: all type: Additional information
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2004-09-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LAMASSOURE Alain group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
BUDG
date
2004-09-02T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: LAMASSOURE Alain
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2004-09-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MULDER Jan group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
CONT
date
2004-09-22T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
docs
  • date: 2005-05-12T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:167:TOC title: OJ C 167 07.07.2005, p. 0001-0006 title: RCC0004/2005 summary: On several occasions the Court has criticised the shortcomings of the system of own resources, which is very complex and presents numerous problems, in particular, regarding administration, consistency and lack of transparency. The most important issues identified by the Court in its regard are as follows: - In 2003, the traditional own resources amounted to 10 857,2 million euro after deduction of a flat-rate amount of 25 %, which was retained by the Member States to cover collection costs. The Court has already stated in its Opinion No 8/99 that collection costs actually constitute an item of expenditure and should be treated as such in the Community accounts and when calculating net balances. - The capping of the VAT assessment base as a percentage of GNI has reduced the significance of the VAT resource in the financing of the budget. The VAT own resource decreased from 35 192,5 million euro (40,0 %) in 2000 to 21 260,1 million euro (25,4 %) in 2003. Capping also accentuated the resource’s macroeconomic character via its link with the GNI. The Court reaffirms its position that a resource based on the taxable consumption of citizens can only be justified if it is directly linked to a tax base. - In addition, tax evasion, in particular ‘roundabout’ frauds facilitated by the current system with taxation taking place in the country of consumption, undeclared economic activity and the varying degrees of efficiency shown by the national authorities in collecting VAT and preventing fraud might still affect the incidence of the financial burden on the Member States. - Furthermore, the results of Court audits cast some doubt on the accuracy and reliability of the VAT statements produced by the Member States, which are compiled after complicated calculations demanding significant administrative resources. The GNI-based resource increased from 37 580,5 million euro (42,7 %) in 2000 to 51 235,2 million euro (61,3 %) in 2003, thus providing the largest share of the own resources. The Court has found that there is limited direct verification by the Commission of the underlying national accounts which provide the figures presented by the Member States in the GNI questionnaires as a basis for calculating the GNI-based resource. This is due to the ambiguity of the rules laying down the obligations and powers of the Commission in this respect. None of the shortcomings described above are addressed in the Commission proposals. The Court stresses the need to deal with them. Turning more specifically to the Commission’s proposal for a Council Regulation laying down the implementing measures for the correction of budgetary imbalances laid down in the Council Decision on the system of the Communities' own resources, the Court made the following specific remarks: - in relation to Art 1 1(a), t he words ‘related to year t ’ should be added to the second indent in order to be consistent with the first indent. - in relation to Art 2(2), A system with a maximum available refund volume (MARV), specified as a discretionary fixed amount of 7,5 billion euro, will not produce consistent results over time, as any GNI variation would affect the relative size of the corrections. Preservation of the ‘real value’ would require further Council agreement and negotiation. If there is a need for such a MARV, it could be expressed as a percentage of GNI. - in relation to Art 4, traditional own resources constitute income under the EU budget and the collection costs should be treated as expenditure accruing to the Member States and included as allocated expenditure in the generalised correction mechanism. The references to ‘payments’, in Article 4(2) should be replaced by ‘expenditure’. - also in relation to Art 4, the definition of expenditure to be excluded from total allocated expenditure, as formulated under the first and second indent of Article 4(2), is in the form of a negative but not exhaustive list allowing for differences from one year to another in the composition of the amount of allocated expenditure. In order to ensure that the amount of allocated expenditure is calculated annually in a consistent and transparent way, the Court suggests adding to this article a provision that the Commission should present a report each year on the allocation of expenditure, also covering expenditure that cannot be allocated to a Member State. - in relation to Art 5 of the proposal, both the definitive calculation of the amount of the correction and its financing by Member States for the year t are based on data on VAT bases and GNI known at December of year t+2 . The Court considers it more appropriate to use VAT and GNI data for the year t+4 as they are then final. type: Court of Auditors: opinion, report body: CofA
events
  • date: 2004-07-14T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0501/COM_COM(2004)0501(COR1)_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0501 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=501 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE : to lay down the implementing measures for the correction of budgetary imbalances laid down in the Council Decision on the system of the Communities' own resources (refer to CNS/2004/0170). PROPOSED ACT : Council Regulation. CONTENT: the proposed Council Decision of 14/07/2004 on the system of the European Communities' own resources calls for the correction for budgetary imbalances granted to the UK under Article 4 of Council Decision 2000/597/EC to be replaced with a generalised system for correcting excessive negative budgetary imbalances. This draft Council Regulation shall lay down the implementing measures for the calculation of these corrections and their financing, in particular the threshold and the maximum available refund volume. In addition, it shall define the categories of expenditure and revenue to be taken into account for the calculation of the corrections. Lastly, it will lay down the rules for entering the corrections in the budget.
  • date: 2004-10-27T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-03-22T00:00:00 type: Additional information body: all summary:
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
BUDG/6/22981
New
  • BUDG/6/22981
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.01 Financing of the budget, own resources
New
8.70.01
Financing of the budget, own resources
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0501/COM_COM(2004)0501_FR.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0501/COM_COM(2004)0501(COR1)_EN.pdf
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
activities
  • date: 2004-07-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0501/COM_COM(2004)0501_FR.pdf celexid: CELEX:52004PC0501(02):EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2004)0501 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget
  • date: 2004-10-27T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2004-09-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LAMASSOURE Alain body: EP responsible: False committee: CONT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • date: 2007-03-22T00:00:00 body: all type: Additional information
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2004-09-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LAMASSOURE Alain
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: CONT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
links
European Commission
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
BUDG/6/22981
reference
2004/0171(CNS)
instrument
Decision
legal_basis
stage_reached
Procedure lapsed or withdrawn
subtype
Legislation
title
European Communities' own resources: implementing measures for the correction of the budgetary imbalances
type
CNS - Consultation procedure
subject
8.70.01 Financing of the budget, own resources