BETA


2004/2138(INI) Assessment of the Doha Round following the WTO agreement on 1 August 2004

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead INTA MORENO SÁNCHEZ Javier (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion DEVE DEVA Nirj (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion AGRI DAUL Joseph (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2005/07/22
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2005/06/16
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2005/05/12
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
Details

The House adopted by 437 votes in favour, to 94 against with 12 abstentions, an own-initiative report on the Doha Round following the WTO agreement on 1 August 2004.

Firstly, Parliament reiterates its resolute support for a free and fair multilateral trade system to promote trade and to contribute to sustainable development and to the effective management of globalisation for the benefit of all.

The Commission is requested to call for rapid progress in all the areas covered by the Decision, so as to enable it to go to Hong Kong in December 2005 with a balanced, far-reaching proposal which will place development at the forefront of the debate.

Parliament asks for the state of play report scheduled by the WTO General Council for July 2005 to be strictly factual, so as not to raise false expectations amongst the public, and asks that a date be set for concluding the work of the Doha Round, taking due account of the time required for all the negotiators to prepare themselves, particularly those of the developing countries.

The Commission is asked to consider the possibility of introducing a "development box" for the LDCs into the agriculture negotiations, so that they can tackle food safety and rural employment, which are major issues when it comes to eradicating poverty.

Members of the WTO are urged to devote equal attention to the three pillars (export subsidies, domestic aids and market access). It asks for these measures to be applied in parallel by all developed-country WTO members, so as to avoid unilateral disarmament on the part of the EU, while applying special and differential treatment to the developing countries.

As regards the CAP reform, Parliament urges the Commission to continue with the planned reform. It states that agriculture is indeed the most important chapter within these negotiations, but points out that this must be the driving force and that progress in this field must be used as leverage and as a negotiating asset in order to make progress in other areas, particularly on trade in services and better access to industrial goods for all WTO members, by effectively reducing import duties and other trade barriers.

It stresses the high level of EU market access for agricultural products from developing countries and calls on other developed partners and emergent countries to proceed to further opening up their markets towards the LDCs.

The Commission is called upon to step up negotiations on NAMA, defining an appropriate formula for eliminating or reducing high tariffs, tariff peaks and tariff escalation, and likewise to study the possibility of partial reciprocity on the part of the developing countries, taking due account of the flexibility they require and applying to them, as to the LDCs, the special and differential treatment principle. It stresses, furthermore, that important trade and development benefits will be ensured through South-South market opening, particularly on the part of the more advanced developing economies. It equally points out the need for the removal of non-tariff barriers, where justified, by all trading partners.

Lastly, Parliament reiterates the need, acknowledged in the Millennium Declaration, to establish closer relations between the WTO and other international organisations, as an essential stage in the process of achieving a different, more sustainable type of globalisation, which will work in the service of common goals and with a view to achieving fully coordinated criteria with regard to the problems of development; believes that in this connection. All WTO Member States should of necessity respect the rules of the International Labour Organization.

2005/05/12
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2005/05/12
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The House adopted by 437 votes in favour, to 94 against with 12 abstentions, an own-initiative report on the Doha Round following the WTO agreement on 1 August 2004.

Firstly, Parliament reiterates its resolute support for a free and fair multilateral trade system to promote trade and to contribute to sustainable development and to the effective management of globalisation for the benefit of all.

The Commission is requested to call for rapid progress in all the areas covered by the Decision, so as to enable it to go to Hong Kong in December 2005 with a balanced, far-reaching proposal which will place development at the forefront of the debate.

Parliament asks for the state of play report scheduled by the WTO General Council for July 2005 to be strictly factual, so as not to raise false expectations amongst the public, and asks that a date be set for concluding the work of the Doha Round, taking due account of the time required for all the negotiators to prepare themselves, particularly those of the developing countries.

The Commission is asked to consider the possibility of introducing a "development box" for the LDCs into the agriculture negotiations, so that they can tackle food safety and rural employment, which are major issues when it comes to eradicating poverty.

Members of the WTO are urged to devote equal attention to the three pillars (export subsidies, domestic aids and market access). It asks for these measures to be applied in parallel by all developed-country WTO members, so as to avoid unilateral disarmament on the part of the EU, while applying special and differential treatment to the developing countries.

As regards the CAP reform, Parliament urges the Commission to continue with the planned reform. It states that agriculture is indeed the most important chapter within these negotiations, but points out that this must be the driving force and that progress in this field must be used as leverage and as a negotiating asset in order to make progress in other areas, particularly on trade in services and better access to industrial goods for all WTO members, by effectively reducing import duties and other trade barriers.

It stresses the high level of EU market access for agricultural products from developing countries and calls on other developed partners and emergent countries to proceed to further opening up their markets towards the LDCs.

The Commission is called upon to step up negotiations on NAMA, defining an appropriate formula for eliminating or reducing high tariffs, tariff peaks and tariff escalation, and likewise to study the possibility of partial reciprocity on the part of the developing countries, taking due account of the flexibility they require and applying to them, as to the LDCs, the special and differential treatment principle. It stresses, furthermore, that important trade and development benefits will be ensured through South-South market opening, particularly on the part of the more advanced developing economies. It equally points out the need for the removal of non-tariff barriers, where justified, by all trading partners.

Lastly, Parliament reiterates the need, acknowledged in the Millennium Declaration, to establish closer relations between the WTO and other international organisations, as an essential stage in the process of achieving a different, more sustainable type of globalisation, which will work in the service of common goals and with a view to achieving fully coordinated criteria with regard to the problems of development; believes that in this connection. All WTO Member States should of necessity respect the rules of the International Labour Organization.

Documents
2005/05/12
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2005/05/11
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2005/04/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2005/04/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2005/04/18
   EP - Vote in committee
2005/03/22
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2005/03/15
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2004/10/28
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2004/10/06
   EP - DEVA Nirj (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2004/09/21
   EP - DAUL Joseph (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI
2004/09/14
   EP - MORENO SÁNCHEZ Javier (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA

Documents

Votes

Rapport Moreno Sanchez A6-0095/2005 - am. 10 #

2005/05/12 Outcome: -: 454, +: 83, 0: 13
CY SE LU MT SI EE SK LV LT CZ IE FI AT PT DK EL BE HU NL FR PL IT GB ES DE
Total
5
14
6
4
5
5
10
8
6
18
10
11
14
18
12
19
21
18
23
48
50
47
49
45
84
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
30

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
18

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: UEN UEN
21

Latvia UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
151

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
208

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2
4

Finland PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Moreno Sanchez A6-0095/2005 - am. 11 #

2005/05/12 Outcome: -: 452, +: 82, 0: 15
EL CY MT SI EE LU LV DK FI LT IE SK CZ SE AT PT BE NL HU FR PL IT ES GB DE
Total
20
5
4
5
5
5
8
10
11
7
10
10
20
14
15
18
21
23
18
48
51
47
42
50
82
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
32

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

3

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
30

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
22

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: UEN UEN
21

Latvia UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
150

Malta PSE

Against (2)

3

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
207

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE-DE

2

Lithuania PPE-DE

2
4

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Rapport Moreno Sanchez A6-0095/2005 - am. 13 #

2005/05/12 Outcome: -: 449, +: 98, 0: 7
SE DK CY LU MT LV SI EE AT LT SK CZ FI IE PT BE EL NL HU GB PL IT FR ES DE
Total
14
12
5
6
4
7
5
5
15
7
10
20
11
10
18
20
20
23
18
49
51
48
49
45
82
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
34

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

3

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
30

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
22

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2

Italy NI

2
icon: UEN UEN
20

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Latvia UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
153

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
208

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Finland PPE-DE

2
4

Rapport Moreno Sanchez A6-0095/2005 - am. 14 #

2005/05/12 Outcome: -: 455, +: 87, 0: 7
SE DK CY LU SI MT EE LV LT AT SK CZ FI IE PT EL BE NL HU GB IT FR ES DE PL
Total
14
12
5
6
4
4
5
8
6
15
9
20
11
10
18
20
21
23
18
48
46
47
45
83
51
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
34

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

3

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
30

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2

Italy NI

2
icon: UEN UEN
21

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Latvia UEN

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
148

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
208

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Finland PPE-DE

2
4

Rapport Moreno Sanchez A6-0095/2005 - am. 5 #

2005/05/12 Outcome: -: 461, +: 64, 0: 21
CY IE LU MT SI EE DK LV LT SK CZ AT FI SE PT EL NL BE HU IT FR ES GB PL DE
Total
5
10
6
4
5
5
10
7
6
10
20
15
10
14
18
20
22
21
18
48
49
43
50
50
80
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
32

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

3

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: UEN UEN
21

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Latvia UEN

Abstain (1)

3
icon: NI NI
22

Slovakia NI

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

2

Italy NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
29

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

3

France IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
148

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
207

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
4

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE-DE

2

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Rapport Moreno Sanchez A6-0095/2005 - am. 3 #

2005/05/12 Outcome: -: 455, +: 87, 0: 10
CY LU SI MT FR BE LV EE DK AT LT IE SK FI CZ SE PT EL NL HU IT ES GB PL DE
Total
4
6
4
4
48
21
7
5
12
15
7
10
10
11
20
14
18
20
23
18
46
45
50
51
83
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
34

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
22

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Italy NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: UEN UEN
20

Latvia UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
30

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
152

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Finland PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
207

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2
4

Finland PPE-DE

2

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Rapport Moreno Sanchez A6-0095/2005 - am. 16 #

2005/05/12 Outcome: -: 469, +: 74, 0: 6
CY SE LU LV MT SI EE FI LT DK IE AT SK CZ PT BE EL HU NL FR IT ES GB DE PL
Total
5
14
6
7
4
5
5
10
7
12
10
14
10
20
18
21
20
17
23
46
48
45
50
81
51
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
33

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

3

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
20

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: UEN UEN
20

Latvia UEN

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
30

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
150

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

For (1)

3

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
208

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
4

Rapport Moreno Sanchez A6-0095/2005 - am. 9 #

2005/05/12 Outcome: -: 283, +: 237, 0: 16
FR SE PT AT ES MT BE EL EE NL CY DK IE SK FI SI LT CZ LU LV IT HU PL GB DE
Total
48
14
18
15
44
4
21
19
5
23
5
9
10
8
9
5
7
17
6
8
45
18
50
50
78
icon: PSE PSE
148

Slovakia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

France GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
29

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
29

France IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
20

Austria NI

2

Belgium NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: UEN UEN
19

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Latvia UEN

Abstain (1)

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Spain ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
203

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
4

Finland PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Rapport Moreno Sanchez A6-0095/2005 - am. 2 #

2005/05/12 Outcome: -: 298, +: 241, 0: 15
PL IE CZ DE LV EL SK HU SI LU CY MT LT EE SE PT AT IT NL FI ES DK GB BE FR
Total
51
10
20
81
8
19
10
18
5
6
5
4
7
5
14
18
15
47
23
11
45
12
50
21
49
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
209

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Finland PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
21

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
30

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
22

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Italy NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
33

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
152

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Rapport Moreno Sanchez A6-0095/2005 - am. 17 #

2005/05/12 Outcome: -: 459, +: 85, 0: 6
CY MT BE SI EE LU LV LT FR DK IE SE FI AT SK CZ PT EL NL HU IT ES GB DE PL
Total
5
4
21
5
5
5
8
7
47
12
10
14
11
15
10
20
17
20
23
18
48
44
50
81
50
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
32

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
22

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Italy NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: UEN UEN
20

Latvia UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
30

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
150

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Slovakia PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
208

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
4

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Finland PPE-DE

2

Rapport Moreno Sanchez A6-0095/2005 - am. 18 #

2005/05/12 Outcome: -: 450, +: 70, 0: 28
CY MT SI EE LU SE LV AT LT DK IE SK FI CZ PT BE EL FR NL HU IT ES GB DE PL
Total
5
4
5
5
5
14
8
15
7
12
10
8
11
20
18
21
20
48
23
18
47
44
50
79
51
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
33

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

3

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
20

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

2

Italy NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
30

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2
icon: UEN UEN
21

Latvia UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
150

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Finland PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
207

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
4

Finland PPE-DE

2

Rapport Moreno Sanchez A6-0095/2005 - am. 4 #

2005/05/12 Outcome: -: 460, +: 84, 0: 5
CY SE LV LU SI MT EE IE LT AT DK SK FI CZ PT NL EL BE HU PL IT ES FR GB DE
Total
5
14
8
6
4
4
5
10
6
15
12
10
11
20
18
23
20
21
18
51
46
43
48
50
81
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
33

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
30

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

2

Italy NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: UEN UEN
21

Latvia UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
148

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

3

Finland PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
208

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
4

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE-DE

2

Rapport Moreno Sanchez A6-0095/2005 - résolution #

2005/05/12 Outcome: +: 437, -: 94, 0: 12
DE ES PL IT FR GB NL HU EL BE PT SE FI CZ DK IE LV LT SK AT EE SI LU MT CY
Total
79
43
49
47
48
49
23
18
20
21
18
14
11
20
12
10
7
7
9
14
5
4
6
4
5
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
204

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Finland PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
148

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Spain ALDE

1
2

Sweden ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
20

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

2

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
30

France IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
32

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2005-03-15T00:00:00
docs
title: PE350.099
committee
AGRI
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/0
date
2005-02-21T00:00:00
docs
title: PE355.377
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-350099_EN.html
docs/1
date
2005-03-15T00:00:00
docs
title: PE350.099
committee
AGRI
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/1
date
2005-03-22T00:00:00
docs
title: PE355.617
committee
DEVE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-355617_EN.html
docs/2
date
2005-03-18T00:00:00
docs
title: PE355.691
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/3
date
2005-03-22T00:00:00
docs
title: PE355.617
committee
DEVE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE350.099
docs/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE355.617
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0095_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0095_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0182_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0182_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2005-04-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0095_EN.html title: A6-0095/2005
events/2
date
2005-04-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0095_EN.html title: A6-0095/2005
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050511&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20050511&type=CRE
events/5
date
2005-05-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0182_EN.html title: T6-0182/2005
summary
events/5
date
2005-05-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0182_EN.html title: T6-0182/2005
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: MORENO SÁNCHEZ Javier date: 2004-09-14T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2004-09-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MORENO SÁNCHEZ Javier group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: DEVA Nirj date: 2004-10-06T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2004-10-06T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DEVA Nirj group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
rapporteur
name: DAUL Joseph date: 2004-09-21T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2004-09-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DAUL Joseph group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE355.617&secondRef=02
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE355.617
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-95&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0095_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-182
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0182_EN.html
docs/6/body
EC
docs/7/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-95&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0095_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-182
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0182_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2004-10-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2004-09-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: DAUL Joseph body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2004-10-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: DEVA Nirj body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2004-09-14T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PSE name: MORENO SÁNCHEZ Javier
  • date: 2005-04-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2004-09-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: DAUL Joseph body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2004-10-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: DEVA Nirj body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2004-09-14T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PSE name: MORENO SÁNCHEZ Javier
  • date: 2005-04-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-95&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0095/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2005-05-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050511&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-05-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3980&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-182 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0182/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2004-09-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MORENO SÁNCHEZ Javier group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AGRI
date
2004-09-21T00:00:00
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: DAUL Joseph
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2004-10-06T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DEVA Nirj group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
DEVE
date
2004-10-06T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: DEVA Nirj
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2004-09-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DAUL Joseph group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
INTA
date
2004-09-14T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: PSE name: MORENO SÁNCHEZ Javier
docs
  • date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00 docs: title: PE355.377 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2005-03-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE350.099 title: PE350.099 committee: AGRI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2005-03-18T00:00:00 docs: title: PE355.691 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2005-03-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE355.617&secondRef=02 title: PE355.617 committee: DEVE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2005-04-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-95&language=EN title: A6-0095/2005 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-05-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-182 title: T6-0182/2005 title: OJ C 092 20.04.2006, p. 0302-0397 E summary: The House adopted by 437 votes in favour, to 94 against with 12 abstentions, an own-initiative report on the Doha Round following the WTO agreement on 1 August 2004. Firstly, Parliament reiterates its resolute support for a free and fair multilateral trade system to promote trade and to contribute to sustainable development and to the effective management of globalisation for the benefit of all. The Commission is requested to call for rapid progress in all the areas covered by the Decision, so as to enable it to go to Hong Kong in December 2005 with a balanced, far-reaching proposal which will place development at the forefront of the debate. Parliament asks for the state of play report scheduled by the WTO General Council for July 2005 to be strictly factual, so as not to raise false expectations amongst the public, and asks that a date be set for concluding the work of the Doha Round, taking due account of the time required for all the negotiators to prepare themselves, particularly those of the developing countries. The Commission is asked to consider the possibility of introducing a "development box" for the LDCs into the agriculture negotiations, so that they can tackle food safety and rural employment, which are major issues when it comes to eradicating poverty. Members of the WTO are urged to devote equal attention to the three pillars (export subsidies, domestic aids and market access). It asks for these measures to be applied in parallel by all developed-country WTO members, so as to avoid unilateral disarmament on the part of the EU, while applying special and differential treatment to the developing countries. As regards the CAP reform, Parliament urges the Commission to continue with the planned reform. It states that agriculture is indeed the most important chapter within these negotiations, but points out that this must be the driving force and that progress in this field must be used as leverage and as a negotiating asset in order to make progress in other areas, particularly on trade in services and better access to industrial goods for all WTO members, by effectively reducing import duties and other trade barriers. It stresses the high level of EU market access for agricultural products from developing countries and calls on other developed partners and emergent countries to proceed to further opening up their markets towards the LDCs. The Commission is called upon to step up negotiations on NAMA, defining an appropriate formula for eliminating or reducing high tariffs, tariff peaks and tariff escalation, and likewise to study the possibility of partial reciprocity on the part of the developing countries, taking due account of the flexibility they require and applying to them, as to the LDCs, the special and differential treatment principle. It stresses, furthermore, that important trade and development benefits will be ensured through South-South market opening, particularly on the part of the more advanced developing economies. It equally points out the need for the removal of non-tariff barriers, where justified, by all trading partners. Lastly, Parliament reiterates the need, acknowledged in the Millennium Declaration, to establish closer relations between the WTO and other international organisations, as an essential stage in the process of achieving a different, more sustainable type of globalisation, which will work in the service of common goals and with a view to achieving fully coordinated criteria with regard to the problems of development; believes that in this connection. All WTO Member States should of necessity respect the rules of the International Labour Organization. type: Text adopted by Parliament, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-06-16T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=3980&j=0&l=en title: SP(2005)2482/2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2005-07-22T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=3980&j=1&l=en title: SP(2005)2765/2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2004-10-28T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-04-18T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-04-21T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-95&language=EN title: A6-0095/2005
  • date: 2005-05-11T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050511&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-05-12T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3980&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2005-05-12T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-182 title: T6-0182/2005 summary: The House adopted by 437 votes in favour, to 94 against with 12 abstentions, an own-initiative report on the Doha Round following the WTO agreement on 1 August 2004. Firstly, Parliament reiterates its resolute support for a free and fair multilateral trade system to promote trade and to contribute to sustainable development and to the effective management of globalisation for the benefit of all. The Commission is requested to call for rapid progress in all the areas covered by the Decision, so as to enable it to go to Hong Kong in December 2005 with a balanced, far-reaching proposal which will place development at the forefront of the debate. Parliament asks for the state of play report scheduled by the WTO General Council for July 2005 to be strictly factual, so as not to raise false expectations amongst the public, and asks that a date be set for concluding the work of the Doha Round, taking due account of the time required for all the negotiators to prepare themselves, particularly those of the developing countries. The Commission is asked to consider the possibility of introducing a "development box" for the LDCs into the agriculture negotiations, so that they can tackle food safety and rural employment, which are major issues when it comes to eradicating poverty. Members of the WTO are urged to devote equal attention to the three pillars (export subsidies, domestic aids and market access). It asks for these measures to be applied in parallel by all developed-country WTO members, so as to avoid unilateral disarmament on the part of the EU, while applying special and differential treatment to the developing countries. As regards the CAP reform, Parliament urges the Commission to continue with the planned reform. It states that agriculture is indeed the most important chapter within these negotiations, but points out that this must be the driving force and that progress in this field must be used as leverage and as a negotiating asset in order to make progress in other areas, particularly on trade in services and better access to industrial goods for all WTO members, by effectively reducing import duties and other trade barriers. It stresses the high level of EU market access for agricultural products from developing countries and calls on other developed partners and emergent countries to proceed to further opening up their markets towards the LDCs. The Commission is called upon to step up negotiations on NAMA, defining an appropriate formula for eliminating or reducing high tariffs, tariff peaks and tariff escalation, and likewise to study the possibility of partial reciprocity on the part of the developing countries, taking due account of the flexibility they require and applying to them, as to the LDCs, the special and differential treatment principle. It stresses, furthermore, that important trade and development benefits will be ensured through South-South market opening, particularly on the part of the more advanced developing economies. It equally points out the need for the removal of non-tariff barriers, where justified, by all trading partners. Lastly, Parliament reiterates the need, acknowledged in the Millennium Declaration, to establish closer relations between the WTO and other international organisations, as an essential stage in the process of achieving a different, more sustainable type of globalisation, which will work in the service of common goals and with a view to achieving fully coordinated criteria with regard to the problems of development; believes that in this connection. All WTO Member States should of necessity respect the rules of the International Labour Organization.
  • date: 2005-05-12T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    INTA/6/23549
    New
    • INTA/6/23549
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 052
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6.20.01 Agreements and relations in the context of the World Trade Organization (WTO)
    New
    6.20.01
    Agreements and relations in the context of the World Trade Organization (WTO)
    activities
    • date: 2004-10-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2004-09-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: DAUL Joseph body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2004-10-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: DEVA Nirj body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2004-09-14T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PSE name: MORENO SÁNCHEZ Javier
    • date: 2005-04-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2004-09-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: DAUL Joseph body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2004-10-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: DEVA Nirj body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2004-09-14T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PSE name: MORENO SÁNCHEZ Javier
    • date: 2005-04-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-95&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0095/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • date: 2005-05-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050511&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2005-05-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3980&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-182 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0182/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2004-09-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: DAUL Joseph
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2004-10-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: DEVA Nirj
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2004-09-14T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PSE name: MORENO SÁNCHEZ Javier
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      INTA/6/23549
      reference
      2004/2138(INI)
      title
      Assessment of the Doha Round following the WTO agreement on 1 August 2004
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      6.20.01 Agreements and relations in the context of the World Trade Organization (WTO)