BETA


2004/2161(INI) Short Sea Shipping

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead TRAN NAVARRO Robert (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion IMCO
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2005/07/22
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2005/05/19
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2005/04/12
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on an own-initiative report drafted by Robert NAVARRO (PES, FR) by 589 votes in favour, 7 against and 13 abstentions. It called for the modal shift from road transport to short sea shipping to be encouraged since the latter is an environmentally-friendly mode of transport. Motorways of the Sea with solid environmental requirements must be established.

Parliament stated that the administrative procedures which hinder the development of short sea shipping should be reduced as much as possible without compromising aspects relating to security and safety, particularly by making full use of electronic communication possibilities. It also called for the development of high-quality corridors for short sea shipping between EU Member States, with public and private participation as well as use of instruments relating to the trans-European transport network and the Marco Polo programme.

Priority should be given to investment in infrastructure in order to improve access to ports from both land and sea, including cross-border projects within the trans-European transport network. Parliament supported the Commission programmes aimed at simplifying the legal framework applying to short sea shipping and inland waterway transport, and encouraging the creation of one-stop shops by simplifying administrative and customs formalities. Parliament stressed the potential of short sea shipping as a complementary mode of transport available very quickly and at low cost pending completion of certain trans-European transport network railway infrastructures. It cited the pressing need for alternative means of transport between France and Spain pending the opening, in about 2020, of a connection between Montpellier and Figueras.

Parliament went on to discuss the following matters:

- a European uniform system of liability for the multimodal chain;

- the need to settle the issue of the standardisation of ILUs, with interoperability being ensured between maritime transport, inland waterways, rail and road transport;

- short sea shipping is covered by Community customs legislation, and the Parliament declared itself in favour of optimum use of the exemptions offered by Community customs rules and the promotion of customs facilities operated under simplified systems for goods which may be moved freely within the framework of authorised regular shipping services;

- the setting-up of further electronic offices at sea ports where all mandatory formalities can be completed in a single operation;

- support structures for short sea shipping: Parliament welcomed the European Short Sea Network action plan and called on the promotion centres to implement it as quickly as possible.

- a strategic environmental impact assessment of the planned Motorways of the Sea must be performed jointly by Member States and the Commission. This EIA should examine the environmental impact not only of the route itself but also of port developments and the impact on transport movements in the hinterland;

- further, on environmental matters, Parliament recalled the need to promote the positive environmental image of short sea shipping, particularly as regards water and air pollution, and therefore to lay down minimum environmental requirements such as the use of low-sulphur fuel and limits for emissions (of SOx, NOx, CO 2 , etc.) into air and water;

Finally, Parliament recognised the importance of the concept of Motorways of the Sea for short sea shipping, chiefly due to co financing infrastructure measures in appropriate cases. It called for the adoption of effective, clear and adequate financing arrangements for actions linked to Motorways of the Sea and short sea shipping lines, allowing the optimum level of complementarity or indeed additionality of financing so as to enable lasting and viable new lines to be set up.

2005/04/12
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2005/04/12
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on an own-initiative report drafted by Robert NAVARRO (PES, FR) by 589 votes in favour, 7 against and 13 abstentions. It called for the modal shift from road transport to short sea shipping to be encouraged since the latter is an environmentally-friendly mode of transport. Motorways of the Sea with solid environmental requirements must be established.

Parliament stated that the administrative procedures which hinder the development of short sea shipping should be reduced as much as possible without compromising aspects relating to security and safety, particularly by making full use of electronic communication possibilities. It also called for the development of high-quality corridors for short sea shipping between EU Member States, with public and private participation as well as use of instruments relating to the trans-European transport network and the Marco Polo programme.

Priority should be given to investment in infrastructure in order to improve access to ports from both land and sea, including cross-border projects within the trans-European transport network. Parliament supported the Commission programmes aimed at simplifying the legal framework applying to short sea shipping and inland waterway transport, and encouraging the creation of one-stop shops by simplifying administrative and customs formalities. Parliament stressed the potential of short sea shipping as a complementary mode of transport available very quickly and at low cost pending completion of certain trans-European transport network railway infrastructures. It cited the pressing need for alternative means of transport between France and Spain pending the opening, in about 2020, of a connection between Montpellier and Figueras.

Parliament went on to discuss the following matters:

- a European uniform system of liability for the multimodal chain;

- the need to settle the issue of the standardisation of ILUs, with interoperability being ensured between maritime transport, inland waterways, rail and road transport;

- short sea shipping is covered by Community customs legislation, and the Parliament declared itself in favour of optimum use of the exemptions offered by Community customs rules and the promotion of customs facilities operated under simplified systems for goods which may be moved freely within the framework of authorised regular shipping services;

- the setting-up of further electronic offices at sea ports where all mandatory formalities can be completed in a single operation;

- support structures for short sea shipping: Parliament welcomed the European Short Sea Network action plan and called on the promotion centres to implement it as quickly as possible.

- a strategic environmental impact assessment of the planned Motorways of the Sea must be performed jointly by Member States and the Commission. This EIA should examine the environmental impact not only of the route itself but also of port developments and the impact on transport movements in the hinterland;

- further, on environmental matters, Parliament recalled the need to promote the positive environmental image of short sea shipping, particularly as regards water and air pollution, and therefore to lay down minimum environmental requirements such as the use of low-sulphur fuel and limits for emissions (of SOx, NOx, CO 2 , etc.) into air and water;

Finally, Parliament recognised the importance of the concept of Motorways of the Sea for short sea shipping, chiefly due to co financing infrastructure measures in appropriate cases. It called for the adoption of effective, clear and adequate financing arrangements for actions linked to Motorways of the Sea and short sea shipping lines, allowing the optimum level of complementarity or indeed additionality of financing so as to enable lasting and viable new lines to be set up.

Documents
2005/04/12
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2005/04/11
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2005/03/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2005/03/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2005/03/15
   EP - Vote in committee
2004/10/28
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2004/09/16
   EP - NAVARRO Robert (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2004/07/02
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE : to promote the development of short sea shipping in Europe.

CONTENT : Following the reports of 1995 and 1999, the Commission presents a further communication on Short Sea Shipping in Europe highlighting the progress achieved since 1999 and linking it to the Programme for the Promotion of Short Sea Shipping.

Short Sea Shipping is growing. Between 1995 and 2002, the tonne-kilometre performance of both Short Sea Shipping and road grew by 25 %. In 2001, Short Sea Shipping performed 40 % of all tonne-kilometres in Europe while the share of road transport was 45 %.

Maritime transport has a higher energy-efficiency than other modes of transport and is, in general, less harmful to the environment. Increased use of Short Sea Shipping would generally be in line with the Community transport and environmental policies.

However, a number of obstacles still hinder the mode from developing faster:

- It has not yet reached full integration in the intermodal door-to-door supply chain;

- It has not yet fully shed its past image of an old-fashioned industry;

- It involves complex administrative procedures;

- It requires high port efficiency.

The Commission states that developing Short Sea Shipping is primarily a task for the industries. Nevertheless, the authorities have a clear role to play in creating an appropriate framework and keeping the mode continuously high on the political agenda, as has been the case in the past years.

Logistics chains involving Short Sea Shipping should be managed and commercialised by one-stop shops, such as freight integrators. These shops should offer customers a single contact point that takes responsibility for the whole intermodal supply chain door to door. This requires efforts from all parties but is a win-win situation.

The Commission, in co-operation with the Short Sea Shipping Focal Points and industry, has been collecting a list of obstacles that hinder the development of Short Sea Shipping. In 2003, two meetings of the Focal Points were dedicated to addressing those alleged bottlenecks one by one in the following categories:

- Image of Short Sea Shipping;

- Door-to-door Short Sea Shipping;

- Administration and documentation;

- Ports and port services;

- Country-specific issues.

A number of bottlenecks on the original list have been solved and work on addressing the remaining 67 bottlenecks in a systematic manner will continue.

The Communication goes on to discuss customs procedures for Short Sea Shipping and port services and security. It points out that harmonisation and standardisation of loading units can have a positive influence on Short Sea Shipping.

The Commission also discusses the criteria and financing for Motorways of the Sea. These should become an integral part of door-to-door logistics chains and offer efficient, regular, reliable and frequent services that can compete with road, for instance, in terms of transit time and price. The ports connected to the Motorways should have efficient hinterland connections, rapid administrative procedures and a high level of service that is targeted to making short-sea operations successful. The Commission is developing guidelines that would set out the criteria and procedures for the funding of Motorways of the Sea projects under the rules of the trans- European transport network thereby facilitating the practical application of those rules.

Although Short Sea Shipping would be the mode to operate on the Motorways of the Sea, its underlying concept is broader than that of Motorways of the Sea, because, apart from transnational links between European Union Member States, Short Sea Shipping also includes connections with close third countries, domestic connections, and connections from mainland to islands.

Finally, the Commission discusses the Marco Polo Programme, which has a goal to shift 12 billion tonne-kilometres a year from road to non-road modes. The budget of the new programme is EUR 100 million for the period 2003-2006.

The first call for proposals under Marco Polo was published in October 2003 with a budget of EUR 15 million. Under this call the Commission received 87 eligible proposals requesting subsidies totalling EUR 182.4 million. 36 % of the proposals related directly to Short Sea Shipping, while 34 % were rail projects, 5 % were inland waterway projects and 25 % involved more than one non-road mode (e.g. Short Sea Shipping in combination with rail or inland waterways). The short-sea proposals made in the selection round were generally of high quality and a substantial share of accepted projects will involve Short Sea Shipping.

2004/07/01
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE : to promote the development of short sea shipping in Europe.

CONTENT : Following the reports of 1995 and 1999, the Commission presents a further communication on Short Sea Shipping in Europe highlighting the progress achieved since 1999 and linking it to the Programme for the Promotion of Short Sea Shipping.

Short Sea Shipping is growing. Between 1995 and 2002, the tonne-kilometre performance of both Short Sea Shipping and road grew by 25 %. In 2001, Short Sea Shipping performed 40 % of all tonne-kilometres in Europe while the share of road transport was 45 %.

Maritime transport has a higher energy-efficiency than other modes of transport and is, in general, less harmful to the environment. Increased use of Short Sea Shipping would generally be in line with the Community transport and environmental policies.

However, a number of obstacles still hinder the mode from developing faster:

- It has not yet reached full integration in the intermodal door-to-door supply chain;

- It has not yet fully shed its past image of an old-fashioned industry;

- It involves complex administrative procedures;

- It requires high port efficiency.

The Commission states that developing Short Sea Shipping is primarily a task for the industries. Nevertheless, the authorities have a clear role to play in creating an appropriate framework and keeping the mode continuously high on the political agenda, as has been the case in the past years.

Logistics chains involving Short Sea Shipping should be managed and commercialised by one-stop shops, such as freight integrators. These shops should offer customers a single contact point that takes responsibility for the whole intermodal supply chain door to door. This requires efforts from all parties but is a win-win situation.

The Commission, in co-operation with the Short Sea Shipping Focal Points and industry, has been collecting a list of obstacles that hinder the development of Short Sea Shipping. In 2003, two meetings of the Focal Points were dedicated to addressing those alleged bottlenecks one by one in the following categories:

- Image of Short Sea Shipping;

- Door-to-door Short Sea Shipping;

- Administration and documentation;

- Ports and port services;

- Country-specific issues.

A number of bottlenecks on the original list have been solved and work on addressing the remaining 67 bottlenecks in a systematic manner will continue.

The Communication goes on to discuss customs procedures for Short Sea Shipping and port services and security. It points out that harmonisation and standardisation of loading units can have a positive influence on Short Sea Shipping.

The Commission also discusses the criteria and financing for Motorways of the Sea. These should become an integral part of door-to-door logistics chains and offer efficient, regular, reliable and frequent services that can compete with road, for instance, in terms of transit time and price. The ports connected to the Motorways should have efficient hinterland connections, rapid administrative procedures and a high level of service that is targeted to making short-sea operations successful. The Commission is developing guidelines that would set out the criteria and procedures for the funding of Motorways of the Sea projects under the rules of the trans- European transport network thereby facilitating the practical application of those rules.

Although Short Sea Shipping would be the mode to operate on the Motorways of the Sea, its underlying concept is broader than that of Motorways of the Sea, because, apart from transnational links between European Union Member States, Short Sea Shipping also includes connections with close third countries, domestic connections, and connections from mainland to islands.

Finally, the Commission discusses the Marco Polo Programme, which has a goal to shift 12 billion tonne-kilometres a year from road to non-road modes. The budget of the new programme is EUR 100 million for the period 2003-2006.

The first call for proposals under Marco Polo was published in October 2003 with a budget of EUR 15 million. Under this call the Commission received 87 eligible proposals requesting subsidies totalling EUR 182.4 million. 36 % of the proposals related directly to Short Sea Shipping, while 34 % were rail projects, 5 % were inland waterway projects and 25 % involved more than one non-road mode (e.g. Short Sea Shipping in combination with rail or inland waterways). The short-sea proposals made in the selection round were generally of high quality and a substantial share of accepted projects will involve Short Sea Shipping.

Documents

Votes

Rapport Navarro A6-0055/2005 - résolution #

2005/04/12 Outcome: +: 589, 0: 13, -: 7
DE FR PL GB IT ES NL CZ PT EL HU BE AT FI SE SK DK IE LT LV SI EE LU CY MT
Total
93
60
51
63
47
45
24
22
20
21
19
17
17
14
15
13
12
10
10
8
6
6
6
5
5
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
228

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
168

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
72

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
37

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: UEN UEN
18

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

United Kingdom IND/DEM

5

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
20

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2004-07-02T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/0
date
2004-12-20T00:00:00
docs
title: PE349.796
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/1
date
2005-02-23T00:00:00
docs
title: PE355.423
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/0
date
2004-07-01T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2004-07-02T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
docs/0
date
2004-07-02T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/2
date
2005-03-18T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0055_EN.html title: A6-0055/2005
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0055_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0055_EN.html
docs/3
date
2005-03-18T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0055_EN.html title: A6-0055/2005
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs/3
date
2005-04-12T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0086_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0086_EN.html
docs/4
date
2005-04-12T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/0
date
2004-07-02T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2004-07-02T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2005-03-18T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0055_EN.html title: A6-0055/2005
events/3
date
2005-03-18T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0055_EN.html title: A6-0055/2005
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050411&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20050411&type=CRE
events/6
date
2005-04-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0086_EN.html title: T6-0086/2005
summary
events/6
date
2005-04-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0086_EN.html title: T6-0086/2005
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
rapporteur
name: NAVARRO Robert date: 2004-09-16T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2004-09-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NAVARRO Robert group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0453/COM_COM(2004)0453_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0453/COM_COM(2004)0453_EN.pdf
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-55&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0055_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-86
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0086_EN.html
docs/5/body
EC
docs/6/body
EC
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0453/COM_COM(2004)0453_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0453/COM_COM(2004)0453_EN.pdf
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-55&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0055_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-86
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0086_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2004-07-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0453/COM_COM(2004)0453_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0453 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52004DC0453:EN body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2004-10-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2004-09-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PSE name: NAVARRO Robert
  • date: 2005-03-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2004-09-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PSE name: NAVARRO Robert
  • date: 2005-03-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-55&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0055/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2005-04-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050411&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3892&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-86 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0086/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2004-09-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NAVARRO Robert group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
TRAN
date
2004-09-16T00:00:00
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
rapporteur
group: PSE name: NAVARRO Robert
docs
  • date: 2004-07-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0453/COM_COM(2004)0453_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0453 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=453 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE : to promote the development of short sea shipping in Europe. CONTENT : Following the reports of 1995 and 1999, the Commission presents a further communication on Short Sea Shipping in Europe highlighting the progress achieved since 1999 and linking it to the Programme for the Promotion of Short Sea Shipping. Short Sea Shipping is growing. Between 1995 and 2002, the tonne-kilometre performance of both Short Sea Shipping and road grew by 25 %. In 2001, Short Sea Shipping performed 40 % of all tonne-kilometres in Europe while the share of road transport was 45 %. Maritime transport has a higher energy-efficiency than other modes of transport and is, in general, less harmful to the environment. Increased use of Short Sea Shipping would generally be in line with the Community transport and environmental policies. However, a number of obstacles still hinder the mode from developing faster: - It has not yet reached full integration in the intermodal door-to-door supply chain; - It has not yet fully shed its past image of an old-fashioned industry; - It involves complex administrative procedures; - It requires high port efficiency. The Commission states that developing Short Sea Shipping is primarily a task for the industries. Nevertheless, the authorities have a clear role to play in creating an appropriate framework and keeping the mode continuously high on the political agenda, as has been the case in the past years. Logistics chains involving Short Sea Shipping should be managed and commercialised by one-stop shops, such as freight integrators. These shops should offer customers a single contact point that takes responsibility for the whole intermodal supply chain door to door. This requires efforts from all parties but is a win-win situation. The Commission, in co-operation with the Short Sea Shipping Focal Points and industry, has been collecting a list of obstacles that hinder the development of Short Sea Shipping. In 2003, two meetings of the Focal Points were dedicated to addressing those alleged bottlenecks one by one in the following categories: - Image of Short Sea Shipping; - Door-to-door Short Sea Shipping; - Administration and documentation; - Ports and port services; - Country-specific issues. A number of bottlenecks on the original list have been solved and work on addressing the remaining 67 bottlenecks in a systematic manner will continue. The Communication goes on to discuss customs procedures for Short Sea Shipping and port services and security. It points out that harmonisation and standardisation of loading units can have a positive influence on Short Sea Shipping. The Commission also discusses the criteria and financing for Motorways of the Sea. These should become an integral part of door-to-door logistics chains and offer efficient, regular, reliable and frequent services that can compete with road, for instance, in terms of transit time and price. The ports connected to the Motorways should have efficient hinterland connections, rapid administrative procedures and a high level of service that is targeted to making short-sea operations successful. The Commission is developing guidelines that would set out the criteria and procedures for the funding of Motorways of the Sea projects under the rules of the trans- European transport network thereby facilitating the practical application of those rules. Although Short Sea Shipping would be the mode to operate on the Motorways of the Sea, its underlying concept is broader than that of Motorways of the Sea, because, apart from transnational links between European Union Member States, Short Sea Shipping also includes connections with close third countries, domestic connections, and connections from mainland to islands. Finally, the Commission discusses the Marco Polo Programme, which has a goal to shift 12 billion tonne-kilometres a year from road to non-road modes. The budget of the new programme is EUR 100 million for the period 2003-2006. The first call for proposals under Marco Polo was published in October 2003 with a budget of EUR 15 million. Under this call the Commission received 87 eligible proposals requesting subsidies totalling EUR 182.4 million. 36 % of the proposals related directly to Short Sea Shipping, while 34 % were rail projects, 5 % were inland waterway projects and 25 % involved more than one non-road mode (e.g. Short Sea Shipping in combination with rail or inland waterways). The short-sea proposals made in the selection round were generally of high quality and a substantial share of accepted projects will involve Short Sea Shipping. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2004-12-20T00:00:00 docs: title: PE349.796 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2005-02-23T00:00:00 docs: title: PE355.423 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2005-03-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-55&language=EN title: A6-0055/2005 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-86 title: T6-0086/2005 title: OJ C 033 09.02.2006, p. 0026-0142 E summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on an own-initiative report drafted by Robert NAVARRO (PES, FR) by 589 votes in favour, 7 against and 13 abstentions. It called for the modal shift from road transport to short sea shipping to be encouraged since the latter is an environmentally-friendly mode of transport. Motorways of the Sea with solid environmental requirements must be established. Parliament stated that the administrative procedures which hinder the development of short sea shipping should be reduced as much as possible without compromising aspects relating to security and safety, particularly by making full use of electronic communication possibilities. It also called for the development of high-quality corridors for short sea shipping between EU Member States, with public and private participation as well as use of instruments relating to the trans-European transport network and the Marco Polo programme. Priority should be given to investment in infrastructure in order to improve access to ports from both land and sea, including cross-border projects within the trans-European transport network. Parliament supported the Commission programmes aimed at simplifying the legal framework applying to short sea shipping and inland waterway transport, and encouraging the creation of one-stop shops by simplifying administrative and customs formalities. Parliament stressed the potential of short sea shipping as a complementary mode of transport available very quickly and at low cost pending completion of certain trans-European transport network railway infrastructures. It cited the pressing need for alternative means of transport between France and Spain pending the opening, in about 2020, of a connection between Montpellier and Figueras. Parliament went on to discuss the following matters: - a European uniform system of liability for the multimodal chain; - the need to settle the issue of the standardisation of ILUs, with interoperability being ensured between maritime transport, inland waterways, rail and road transport; - short sea shipping is covered by Community customs legislation, and the Parliament declared itself in favour of optimum use of the exemptions offered by Community customs rules and the promotion of customs facilities operated under simplified systems for goods which may be moved freely within the framework of authorised regular shipping services; - the setting-up of further electronic offices at sea ports where all mandatory formalities can be completed in a single operation; - support structures for short sea shipping: Parliament welcomed the European Short Sea Network action plan and called on the promotion centres to implement it as quickly as possible. - a strategic environmental impact assessment of the planned Motorways of the Sea must be performed jointly by Member States and the Commission. This EIA should examine the environmental impact not only of the route itself but also of port developments and the impact on transport movements in the hinterland; - further, on environmental matters, Parliament recalled the need to promote the positive environmental image of short sea shipping, particularly as regards water and air pollution, and therefore to lay down minimum environmental requirements such as the use of low-sulphur fuel and limits for emissions (of SOx, NOx, CO 2 , etc.) into air and water; Finally, Parliament recognised the importance of the concept of Motorways of the Sea for short sea shipping, chiefly due to co financing infrastructure measures in appropriate cases. It called for the adoption of effective, clear and adequate financing arrangements for actions linked to Motorways of the Sea and short sea shipping lines, allowing the optimum level of complementarity or indeed additionality of financing so as to enable lasting and viable new lines to be set up. type: Text adopted by Parliament, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-05-19T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=3892&j=0&l=en title: SP(2005)2124 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2005-07-22T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=3892&j=1&l=en title: SP(2005)2323 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2004-07-02T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0453/COM_COM(2004)0453_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0453 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=453 title: EUR-Lex summary: The Commission presents a new Communication on Short Sea Shipping in Europe highlighting the progress achieved since 1999 and linking it to the Programme for the Promotion of Short Sea Shipping). Between 1995 and 2002, the tonne-kilometre performance of both Short Sea Shipping and road grew by 25 %. In 2001, Short Sea Shipping performed 40 % of all tonne-kilometres in Europe while the share of road transport was 45 %. There is no doubt that passenger transport is an important part of Short Sea Shipping and helps increase cohesion. However, since the main objective of promoting Short Sea Shipping is to achieve a modal shift for goods transport, and since the potential of alleviating traffic congestion by shifting passengers from road to sea seems marginal in comparison with freight, this Communication concentrates on goods transport. Firstly, the document underlines that maritime transport has a higher energy-efficiency than other modes of transport and is, in general, less harmful to the environment. Increased use of Short Sea Shipping would generally be in line with the Community transport and environmental policies. It is necessary to overcome the obstacles to the development of short sea shipping. The Commission, in co-operation with the Short Sea Shipping Focal Points [8] and industry, has been collecting a list of obstacles that hinder the development of Short Sea Shipping. In 2003, two meetings of the Focal Points were dedicated to addressing those alleged bottlenecks. Moreover, the Commission presented in 2002 a Guide to Customs Procedures for Short Sea Shipping. The Guide has a two-fold purpose. First, it outlines the EU Customs rules that apply to Short Sea Shipping, including the opportunities that are available to use simplified Customs procedures. And, second, it gives a concise basis for identifying whether there could be concrete needs for modifications or further simplifications. Short Sea Shipping needs efficient and short-sea friendly ports whether these are seaports, island ports or sea-river ports. It needs reasonable turnaround times, and transparent procedures and charges. Only with ports operating seamlessly in the intermodal chain, can Short Sea Shipping enhance its true role in Europe. And these pre-conditions are not always being met. Consequently, the Commission made in 2001 a proposal on access to the port services market in the European Union. This proposal aimed to increase the efficiency and lower the costs of certain port services: pilotage, towing, mooring, services to passengers and cargo handling. The Commission strongly emphasised the concept of "Motorways of the Sea". These Motorways of the Sea should become part of the trans-European network (TEN-T) - just like land motorways and railways - and reduce road congestion and/or improve access to peripheral and island regions and States. In addition to reducing the number of lorries on the main roads, they could also in certain cases contribute to fostering the transport of passengers by sea since vessels can carry freight and passengers at the same time. Motorways of the Sea should become an integral part of door-to-door logistics chains and offer efficient, regular, reliable and frequent services that can compete with road, for instance, in terms of transit time and price. The ports connected to the Motorways should have efficient hinterland connections, rapid administrative procedures and a high level of service that is targeted to making short-sea operations successful. To help this process, the Commission is developing guidelines that would set out the criteria and procedures for the funding of Motorways of the Sea projects under the rules of the trans-European transport network thereby facilitating the practical application of those rules. The guidelines are expected to be ready shortly after the new TEN-T Guidelines enter into force. Lastly, not everyone is, so far, aware of the modern benefits of door-to-door Short Sea Shipping. This is being tackled by general promotion at EU level and two separate European networks of promotion each with their specific tasks: Short Sea Shipping Focal Points and Short Sea Promotion Centres. In conclusion, the Commission recalls that that the promotion of Short Sea Shipping is a long-term exercise and the impact of the ongoing work can be properly evaluated on a Europe-wide scale only over a longer time perspective. The Commission will continue to promote Short Sea Shipping and review its developments; to this end, it intends to present further Communications or progress reports when appropriate.
  • date: 2004-10-28T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-03-15T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-03-18T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-55&language=EN title: A6-0055/2005
  • date: 2005-04-11T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050411&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-04-12T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3892&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2005-04-12T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-86 title: T6-0086/2005 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on an own-initiative report drafted by Robert NAVARRO (PES, FR) by 589 votes in favour, 7 against and 13 abstentions. It called for the modal shift from road transport to short sea shipping to be encouraged since the latter is an environmentally-friendly mode of transport. Motorways of the Sea with solid environmental requirements must be established. Parliament stated that the administrative procedures which hinder the development of short sea shipping should be reduced as much as possible without compromising aspects relating to security and safety, particularly by making full use of electronic communication possibilities. It also called for the development of high-quality corridors for short sea shipping between EU Member States, with public and private participation as well as use of instruments relating to the trans-European transport network and the Marco Polo programme. Priority should be given to investment in infrastructure in order to improve access to ports from both land and sea, including cross-border projects within the trans-European transport network. Parliament supported the Commission programmes aimed at simplifying the legal framework applying to short sea shipping and inland waterway transport, and encouraging the creation of one-stop shops by simplifying administrative and customs formalities. Parliament stressed the potential of short sea shipping as a complementary mode of transport available very quickly and at low cost pending completion of certain trans-European transport network railway infrastructures. It cited the pressing need for alternative means of transport between France and Spain pending the opening, in about 2020, of a connection between Montpellier and Figueras. Parliament went on to discuss the following matters: - a European uniform system of liability for the multimodal chain; - the need to settle the issue of the standardisation of ILUs, with interoperability being ensured between maritime transport, inland waterways, rail and road transport; - short sea shipping is covered by Community customs legislation, and the Parliament declared itself in favour of optimum use of the exemptions offered by Community customs rules and the promotion of customs facilities operated under simplified systems for goods which may be moved freely within the framework of authorised regular shipping services; - the setting-up of further electronic offices at sea ports where all mandatory formalities can be completed in a single operation; - support structures for short sea shipping: Parliament welcomed the European Short Sea Network action plan and called on the promotion centres to implement it as quickly as possible. - a strategic environmental impact assessment of the planned Motorways of the Sea must be performed jointly by Member States and the Commission. This EIA should examine the environmental impact not only of the route itself but also of port developments and the impact on transport movements in the hinterland; - further, on environmental matters, Parliament recalled the need to promote the positive environmental image of short sea shipping, particularly as regards water and air pollution, and therefore to lay down minimum environmental requirements such as the use of low-sulphur fuel and limits for emissions (of SOx, NOx, CO 2 , etc.) into air and water; Finally, Parliament recognised the importance of the concept of Motorways of the Sea for short sea shipping, chiefly due to co financing infrastructure measures in appropriate cases. It called for the adoption of effective, clear and adequate financing arrangements for actions linked to Motorways of the Sea and short sea shipping lines, allowing the optimum level of complementarity or indeed additionality of financing so as to enable lasting and viable new lines to be set up.
  • date: 2005-04-12T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    TRAN/6/23613
    New
    • TRAN/6/23613
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 052
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 3.20.03 Maritime transport: passengers and freight
    New
    3.20.03
    Maritime transport: passengers and freight
    activities/0/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0453/COM_COM(2004)0453_EN.pdf
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0453/COM_COM(2004)0453_EN.pdf
    procedure/subject/0
    Old
    3.20.03 Sea transport: passengers and freight
    New
    3.20.03 Maritime transport: passengers and freight
    activities
    • date: 2004-07-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0453/COM_COM(2004)0453_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52004DC0453:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2004)0453 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission:
    • date: 2004-10-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2004-09-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PSE name: NAVARRO Robert
    • date: 2005-03-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2004-09-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PSE name: NAVARRO Robert
    • date: 2005-03-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-55&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0055/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • date: 2005-04-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050411&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2005-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3892&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-86 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0086/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2004-09-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PSE name: NAVARRO Robert
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      TRAN/6/23613
      reference
      2004/2161(INI)
      title
      Short Sea Shipping
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      3.20.03 Sea transport: passengers and freight