BETA


2004/2172(INI) Annual report on the Common foreign and security policy, CFSP 2003

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET BROK Elmar (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 142-p1, RoP 54

Events

2005/05/19
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2005/04/25
   CSL - Council Meeting
2005/04/14
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Elmar BROK (EPP-ED, DE). (Please see the document of 16/03/05.) The vote was adopted by 431 for, 85 against and 31 abstentions. Parliament asked the Council to ensure that its policy instruments, such as sanctions policy, are implemented with greater rigour and political commitment. The Council should also make every effort to give real substance to the Solidarity Clause for Defence provided for in the Constitutional Treaty as soon as that Treaty enters into force and a genuine and effective common foreign and security policy is in place.

In the context of the Security Strategy, Parliament emphasised the need to develop a corresponding security culture and therefore supported unreservedly the work now under way on implementing the EU training concept in the ESDP sphere. The development and setting-up of a European Security and Defence College must in future provide the institutions of the European Union and the Member States with well-trained staff who are capable of operating effectively in the ESDP sphere; to this end, the College must be organised on a viable basis and appropriately funded.

Parliament asked the Council to take immediate steps to correct the existing imbalance in geographical terms among the CFSP acts adopted in the last ten years, so that a fairer balance between the different regions can be achieved in accordance with the global ambitions of the Union. The Council should particularly strike a geographical balance between the efforts made so far eastwards due to enlargement and renewed efforts towards the south of the Mediterranean. However, it should avoid any cool gesture of diminished interest on the part of the EU for progress in the western Balkans, Ukraine and the southern Caucasus, at least.

Therefore, Parliament felt that steps should be taken by the Council to enable the EU to take advantage of the privileged relationships existing with certain geographical areas (via bi-regional, multilateral or bilateral association agreements, etc.), in order to reinforce its multilateral strength when dealing with other emerging countries and regions with which no such privileged relationships have yet been established. I ncreased priority must not be given to the EU's neighbourhood at the expense of crucial relations and solidarity between the EU and developing countries in the world.

Moving on, Parliament regretted that relations with China have made progress only in the trade and economic fields, without any substantial achievement as regards human rights and democracy issues. There must be a binding EU code governing arms exports. T he Council should not lift the arms embargo, but must find ways to encourage disarmament in cross-strait relations, supporting.

Parliament felt that it is important for the EU and the USA to have a constructive relationship and for NATO to become once again more of a forum for political debate on an equal footing, in which a sensible balance must be struck between the instruments of prevention, crisis management and military capability. It is vital to adopt common positions (EP-US Congress) on certain global issues of common interest (the fight against terrorism, regional conflicts, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, disarmament, international law, effective multilateralism, energy cooperation, climate change, etc). Especially in 2005, the tenth anniversary of the Madrid Declaration, new impetus should be given to transatlantic relations - completion of the transatlantic market by 2015, updating of the New Transatlantic Agenda with a Transatlantic Partnership Agreement to enter into force as soon as possible.

Parliament considered that the EU as such should play a key role in the United Nations system, have a seat at the Security Council in future and support reform proposed by Kofi Annan.

Finally, Parliament insisted on the crucial importance of making every effort to achieve a solution to the Middle East conflict on the basis of the Quartet Road Map and the implementation of the Strategic Partnership with the Mediterranean and the Middle East decided by the European Council in June 2004. The utmost effort must be made to contribute to the resolution of other existing or foreseeable conflicts and crises, such as those in Kosovo, Chechnya, Darfur, Somalia, the Great Lakes region, Iran and North Korea (DPRK), and to the pursuit of social progress in the world in line with the UN Millennium Development Goals.

2005/04/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2005/04/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Elmar BROK (EPP-ED, DE). (Please see the document of 16/03/05.) The vote was adopted by 431 for, 85 against and 31 abstentions. Parliament asked the Council to ensure that its policy instruments, such as sanctions policy, are implemented with greater rigour and political commitment. The Council should also make every effort to give real substance to the Solidarity Clause for Defence provided for in the Constitutional Treaty as soon as that Treaty enters into force and a genuine and effective common foreign and security policy is in place.

In the context of the Security Strategy, Parliament emphasised the need to develop a corresponding security culture and therefore supported unreservedly the work now under way on implementing the EU training concept in the ESDP sphere. The development and setting-up of a European Security and Defence College must in future provide the institutions of the European Union and the Member States with well-trained staff who are capable of operating effectively in the ESDP sphere; to this end, the College must be organised on a viable basis and appropriately funded.

Parliament asked the Council to take immediate steps to correct the existing imbalance in geographical terms among the CFSP acts adopted in the last ten years, so that a fairer balance between the different regions can be achieved in accordance with the global ambitions of the Union. The Council should particularly strike a geographical balance between the efforts made so far eastwards due to enlargement and renewed efforts towards the south of the Mediterranean. However, it should avoid any cool gesture of diminished interest on the part of the EU for progress in the western Balkans, Ukraine and the southern Caucasus, at least.

Therefore, Parliament felt that steps should be taken by the Council to enable the EU to take advantage of the privileged relationships existing with certain geographical areas (via bi-regional, multilateral or bilateral association agreements, etc.), in order to reinforce its multilateral strength when dealing with other emerging countries and regions with which no such privileged relationships have yet been established. I ncreased priority must not be given to the EU's neighbourhood at the expense of crucial relations and solidarity between the EU and developing countries in the world.

Moving on, Parliament regretted that relations with China have made progress only in the trade and economic fields, without any substantial achievement as regards human rights and democracy issues. There must be a binding EU code governing arms exports. T he Council should not lift the arms embargo, but must find ways to encourage disarmament in cross-strait relations, supporting.

Parliament felt that it is important for the EU and the USA to have a constructive relationship and for NATO to become once again more of a forum for political debate on an equal footing, in which a sensible balance must be struck between the instruments of prevention, crisis management and military capability. It is vital to adopt common positions (EP-US Congress) on certain global issues of common interest (the fight against terrorism, regional conflicts, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, disarmament, international law, effective multilateralism, energy cooperation, climate change, etc). Especially in 2005, the tenth anniversary of the Madrid Declaration, new impetus should be given to transatlantic relations - completion of the transatlantic market by 2015, updating of the New Transatlantic Agenda with a Transatlantic Partnership Agreement to enter into force as soon as possible.

Parliament considered that the EU as such should play a key role in the United Nations system, have a seat at the Security Council in future and support reform proposed by Kofi Annan.

Finally, Parliament insisted on the crucial importance of making every effort to achieve a solution to the Middle East conflict on the basis of the Quartet Road Map and the implementation of the Strategic Partnership with the Mediterranean and the Middle East decided by the European Council in June 2004. The utmost effort must be made to contribute to the resolution of other existing or foreseeable conflicts and crises, such as those in Kosovo, Chechnya, Darfur, Somalia, the Great Lakes region, Iran and North Korea (DPRK), and to the pursuit of social progress in the world in line with the UN Millennium Development Goals.

Documents
2005/04/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2005/04/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2005/03/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2005/03/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2005/03/16
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Elmar BROK ( EPP-ED , DE ) in response to the annual report from the Council on the common foreign and security policy (CFSP).

On institutional matters, the committee rejected the Council's approach of simply informing Parliament of CFSP activity after the event in the annual report. It said that the Council should instead consult Parliament each year on the main choices to be made over the following 12 months. MEPs said that many of the innovations in foreign policy envisaged by the proposed EU Constitution could be put into practice already, with greater steps being taken to ensure the representation of the EU as a whole in international multinational organisations. They welcomed the creation of the European Defence Agency, but noted the importance of its being democratically accountable and transparent in all its work.

The committee supported the "civil-military holistic approach" of the EU Security Strategy. It stressed its strong belief that nuclear disarmament would contribute significantly to international security. The report said that the fight against terrorism should remain an EU priority and a key element of external policy.

Among individual issues raised in the report, the committee stressed the importance of decisions on the final status of Kosovo, progress in the Middle East peace process, close cooperation with the USA and with Russia , and the situation in Iraq , Iran , North Korea and Afghanistan . The committee also called for the arms embargo on China to be maintained.

2004/10/28
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2004/09/13
   EP - BROK Elmar (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Votes

Rapport Brok A6-0062/2005 - par. 14 #

2005/04/14 Outcome: +: 444, -: 87, 0: 19
DE ES FR IT PL HU PT BE NL EL DK AT SK LV LT FI SI IE EE SE LU CY MT GB CZ
Total
83
41
54
46
48
19
22
18
23
19
12
15
12
9
7
12
5
9
5
15
5
3
4
46
18
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
202

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

1

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
154

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

Abstain (2)

3

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
68
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: UEN UEN
17

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3
icon: NI NI
20

Italy NI

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
25

France IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Rapport Brok A6-0062/2005 - par. 45 #

2005/04/14 Outcome: +: 428, -: 96, 0: 16
DE FR ES IT PL HU NL PT BE EL DK AT SK LV LT EE LU SI FI CY MT IE GB SE CZ
Total
80
55
40
48
43
19
24
21
20
19
12
14
11
8
7
5
5
4
12
3
3
10
46
14
17
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
194

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

1

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE-DE

3
icon: PSE PSE
153

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Malta PSE

Abstain (2)

2

Ireland PSE

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
68
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Spain Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
16

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
25

France IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Rapport Brok A6-0062/2005 - par. 46 #

2005/04/14 Outcome: +: 418, -: 93, 0: 28
DE ES FR IT PL HU NL PT EL BE DK SK AT LT LV EE SI LU MT FI CY IE CZ GB SE
Total
78
41
56
44
49
19
24
21
19
16
12
12
13
7
9
5
4
4
4
12
3
10
17
47
13
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
197

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

1

Ireland PPE-DE

3

Sweden PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: PSE PSE
152

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

Abstain (2)

3

Finland PSE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland PSE

1

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
20

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3
icon: NI NI
19

Italy NI

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

3

Austria NI

2

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
25

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

France IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Rapport Brok A6-0062/2005 - résolution #

2005/04/14 Outcome: +: 431, -: 85, 0: 31
DE ES FR IT PL HU PT NL BE EL SK AT DK LV LT SE FI SI EE LU IE MT CY CZ GB
Total
78
41
55
46
48
19
22
24
20
19
12
14
12
9
7
14
12
5
5
5
10
4
3
18
45
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
198

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

1
icon: PSE PSE
152

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Malta PSE

Abstain (2)

3

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
68
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: UEN UEN
19

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

Against (1)

3
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

3

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

Austria NI

2

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

France IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2005-01-31T00:00:00
docs
title: PE349.859
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/1
date
2005-02-24T00:00:00
docs
title: PE355.428
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0062_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0062_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0132_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0132_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2005-03-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0062_EN.html title: A6-0062/2005
events/2
date
2005-03-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0062_EN.html title: A6-0062/2005
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050413&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20050413&type=CRE
events/5
date
2005-04-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0132_EN.html title: T6-0132/2005
summary
events/5
date
2005-04-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0132_EN.html title: T6-0132/2005
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 142-p1
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 132-p1
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 52
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: BROK Elmar date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2004-09-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BROK Elmar group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-62&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0062_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-132
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0132_EN.html
docs/4/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-62&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0062_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-132
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0132_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2004-10-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BROK Elmar
  • date: 2005-03-16T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BROK Elmar type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2005-03-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-62&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0062/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2005-04-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050413&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-04-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3905&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-132 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0132/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2005-04-25T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2655
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2004-09-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BROK Elmar group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2004-09-13T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: BROK Elmar
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2655 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2655*&MEET_DATE=25/04/2005 date: 2005-04-25T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 docs: title: PE349.859 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2005-02-24T00:00:00 docs: title: PE355.428 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2005-03-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-62&language=EN title: A6-0062/2005 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-04-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-132 title: T6-0132/2005 title: OJ C 033 09.02.2006, p. 0496-0573 E summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Elmar BROK (EPP-ED, DE). (Please see the document of 16/03/05.) The vote was adopted by 431 for, 85 against and 31 abstentions. Parliament asked the Council to ensure that its policy instruments, such as sanctions policy, are implemented with greater rigour and political commitment. The Council should also make every effort to give real substance to the Solidarity Clause for Defence provided for in the Constitutional Treaty as soon as that Treaty enters into force and a genuine and effective common foreign and security policy is in place. In the context of the Security Strategy, Parliament emphasised the need to develop a corresponding security culture and therefore supported unreservedly the work now under way on implementing the EU training concept in the ESDP sphere. The development and setting-up of a European Security and Defence College must in future provide the institutions of the European Union and the Member States with well-trained staff who are capable of operating effectively in the ESDP sphere; to this end, the College must be organised on a viable basis and appropriately funded. Parliament asked the Council to take immediate steps to correct the existing imbalance in geographical terms among the CFSP acts adopted in the last ten years, so that a fairer balance between the different regions can be achieved in accordance with the global ambitions of the Union. The Council should particularly strike a geographical balance between the efforts made so far eastwards due to enlargement and renewed efforts towards the south of the Mediterranean. However, it should avoid any cool gesture of diminished interest on the part of the EU for progress in the western Balkans, Ukraine and the southern Caucasus, at least. Therefore, Parliament felt that steps should be taken by the Council to enable the EU to take advantage of the privileged relationships existing with certain geographical areas (via bi-regional, multilateral or bilateral association agreements, etc.), in order to reinforce its multilateral strength when dealing with other emerging countries and regions with which no such privileged relationships have yet been established. I ncreased priority must not be given to the EU's neighbourhood at the expense of crucial relations and solidarity between the EU and developing countries in the world. Moving on, Parliament regretted that relations with China have made progress only in the trade and economic fields, without any substantial achievement as regards human rights and democracy issues. There must be a binding EU code governing arms exports. T he Council should not lift the arms embargo, but must find ways to encourage disarmament in cross-strait relations, supporting. Parliament felt that it is important for the EU and the USA to have a constructive relationship and for NATO to become once again more of a forum for political debate on an equal footing, in which a sensible balance must be struck between the instruments of prevention, crisis management and military capability. It is vital to adopt common positions (EP-US Congress) on certain global issues of common interest (the fight against terrorism, regional conflicts, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, disarmament, international law, effective multilateralism, energy cooperation, climate change, etc). Especially in 2005, the tenth anniversary of the Madrid Declaration, new impetus should be given to transatlantic relations - completion of the transatlantic market by 2015, updating of the New Transatlantic Agenda with a Transatlantic Partnership Agreement to enter into force as soon as possible. Parliament considered that the EU as such should play a key role in the United Nations system, have a seat at the Security Council in future and support reform proposed by Kofi Annan. Finally, Parliament insisted on the crucial importance of making every effort to achieve a solution to the Middle East conflict on the basis of the Quartet Road Map and the implementation of the Strategic Partnership with the Mediterranean and the Middle East decided by the European Council in June 2004. The utmost effort must be made to contribute to the resolution of other existing or foreseeable conflicts and crises, such as those in Kosovo, Chechnya, Darfur, Somalia, the Great Lakes region, Iran and North Korea (DPRK), and to the pursuit of social progress in the world in line with the UN Millennium Development Goals. type: Text adopted by Parliament, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-05-19T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=3905&j=0&l=en title: SP(2005)2124 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2004-10-28T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-03-16T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Elmar BROK ( EPP-ED , DE ) in response to the annual report from the Council on the common foreign and security policy (CFSP). On institutional matters, the committee rejected the Council's approach of simply informing Parliament of CFSP activity after the event in the annual report. It said that the Council should instead consult Parliament each year on the main choices to be made over the following 12 months. MEPs said that many of the innovations in foreign policy envisaged by the proposed EU Constitution could be put into practice already, with greater steps being taken to ensure the representation of the EU as a whole in international multinational organisations. They welcomed the creation of the European Defence Agency, but noted the importance of its being democratically accountable and transparent in all its work. The committee supported the "civil-military holistic approach" of the EU Security Strategy. It stressed its strong belief that nuclear disarmament would contribute significantly to international security. The report said that the fight against terrorism should remain an EU priority and a key element of external policy. Among individual issues raised in the report, the committee stressed the importance of decisions on the final status of Kosovo, progress in the Middle East peace process, close cooperation with the USA and with Russia , and the situation in Iraq , Iran , North Korea and Afghanistan . The committee also called for the arms embargo on China to be maintained.
  • date: 2005-03-21T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-62&language=EN title: A6-0062/2005
  • date: 2005-04-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050413&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-04-14T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3905&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2005-04-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-132 title: T6-0132/2005 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Elmar BROK (EPP-ED, DE). (Please see the document of 16/03/05.) The vote was adopted by 431 for, 85 against and 31 abstentions. Parliament asked the Council to ensure that its policy instruments, such as sanctions policy, are implemented with greater rigour and political commitment. The Council should also make every effort to give real substance to the Solidarity Clause for Defence provided for in the Constitutional Treaty as soon as that Treaty enters into force and a genuine and effective common foreign and security policy is in place. In the context of the Security Strategy, Parliament emphasised the need to develop a corresponding security culture and therefore supported unreservedly the work now under way on implementing the EU training concept in the ESDP sphere. The development and setting-up of a European Security and Defence College must in future provide the institutions of the European Union and the Member States with well-trained staff who are capable of operating effectively in the ESDP sphere; to this end, the College must be organised on a viable basis and appropriately funded. Parliament asked the Council to take immediate steps to correct the existing imbalance in geographical terms among the CFSP acts adopted in the last ten years, so that a fairer balance between the different regions can be achieved in accordance with the global ambitions of the Union. The Council should particularly strike a geographical balance between the efforts made so far eastwards due to enlargement and renewed efforts towards the south of the Mediterranean. However, it should avoid any cool gesture of diminished interest on the part of the EU for progress in the western Balkans, Ukraine and the southern Caucasus, at least. Therefore, Parliament felt that steps should be taken by the Council to enable the EU to take advantage of the privileged relationships existing with certain geographical areas (via bi-regional, multilateral or bilateral association agreements, etc.), in order to reinforce its multilateral strength when dealing with other emerging countries and regions with which no such privileged relationships have yet been established. I ncreased priority must not be given to the EU's neighbourhood at the expense of crucial relations and solidarity between the EU and developing countries in the world. Moving on, Parliament regretted that relations with China have made progress only in the trade and economic fields, without any substantial achievement as regards human rights and democracy issues. There must be a binding EU code governing arms exports. T he Council should not lift the arms embargo, but must find ways to encourage disarmament in cross-strait relations, supporting. Parliament felt that it is important for the EU and the USA to have a constructive relationship and for NATO to become once again more of a forum for political debate on an equal footing, in which a sensible balance must be struck between the instruments of prevention, crisis management and military capability. It is vital to adopt common positions (EP-US Congress) on certain global issues of common interest (the fight against terrorism, regional conflicts, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, disarmament, international law, effective multilateralism, energy cooperation, climate change, etc). Especially in 2005, the tenth anniversary of the Madrid Declaration, new impetus should be given to transatlantic relations - completion of the transatlantic market by 2015, updating of the New Transatlantic Agenda with a Transatlantic Partnership Agreement to enter into force as soon as possible. Parliament considered that the EU as such should play a key role in the United Nations system, have a seat at the Security Council in future and support reform proposed by Kofi Annan. Finally, Parliament insisted on the crucial importance of making every effort to achieve a solution to the Middle East conflict on the basis of the Quartet Road Map and the implementation of the Strategic Partnership with the Mediterranean and the Middle East decided by the European Council in June 2004. The utmost effort must be made to contribute to the resolution of other existing or foreseeable conflicts and crises, such as those in Kosovo, Chechnya, Darfur, Somalia, the Great Lakes region, Iran and North Korea (DPRK), and to the pursuit of social progress in the world in line with the UN Millennium Development Goals.
  • date: 2005-04-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/6/23686
    New
    • AFET/6/23686
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 132-p1
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/legal_basis/1
    Rules of Procedure EP 52
    procedure/legal_basis/1
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 132-p1
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6.10 Common foreign and security policy (CFSP)
    New
    6.10
    Common foreign and security policy (CFSP)
    activities
    • date: 2004-10-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BROK Elmar
    • date: 2005-03-16T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BROK Elmar type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 2005-03-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-62&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0062/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • date: 2005-04-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050413&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2005-04-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3905&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-132 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0132/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2005-04-25T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2655
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BROK Elmar
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      AFET/6/23686
      reference
      2004/2172(INI)
      title
      Annual report on the Common foreign and security policy, CFSP 2003
      legal_basis
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Annual report
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      6.10 Common foreign and security policy (CFSP)