BETA


2004/2184(INI) Romania's progress towards accession. Strategy paper and 2004 report

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET MOSCOVICI Pierre (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion CONT
Committee Opinion LIBE
Committee Opinion INTA
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion FEMM
Committee Opinion PETI
Committee Opinion REGI
Committee Opinion AFCO
Committee Opinion DEVE
Committee Opinion CULT
Committee Opinion PECH
Committee Opinion AGRI
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion BUDG DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion ITRE
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2005/10/25
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

In presenting this Report the Commission fulfils the commitment made in its 2004 Strategy Paper (please refer to the summary of the non-legislative base document of 06/10/2004 ) and responds to a request expressed by the European Council in December 2004 to continue to submit annual reports on Bulgaria and Romania’s progress towards accession, together with recommendations if appropriate. This Report assesses the countries’ preparedness for membership, identifies remaining gaps and presents steps to be taken for dealing with these (sometimes serious) gaps. It reflects the situation at the end of September 2005.

Main points of the Commission’s analysis : for further details regarding the Commission’s conclusions on the level of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria and Romania, please refer to the summaries of the specific regular reports – SEC(2005)1352 and SEC(2005)1354:

1) The Commission confirms that Bulgaria and Romania meet the political criteria for membership. Nevertheless, further efforts are needed in particular to strengthen the rule of law, by improving public administration and the justice system and by fighting corruption effectively.

2) Bulgaria and Romania fulfil the requirement of being a functioning market economy. Bulgaria’s continuation of the current pace of its reform path and Romania’s vigorous implementation of its structural reform programme should enable them to withstand competitive pressure and market forces within the EU.

3) Both countries have continued to make progress in adopting and implementing EU legislation. In most areas they are well advanced. However, the Commission has also identified a number of areas where increased efforts are required. The authorities in both countries should vigorously pursue their preparations in order to ensure the full benefit of membership for their citizens.

Areas of concern : There are a limited number of specific gaps in both countries’ preparations which give cause for serious concern. Without immediate action Bulgaria and Romania will most likely not be able to fulfil their obligations in those specific areas by 1 January 2007. Both countries will need to pay attention to reinforcing their administrative and judicial capacity in order to adequately implement and enforce the required legislation. Vigorous steps will need to be taken in the fight against corruption and in the reforms of the justice system and the public administration in order to ensure the proper functioning of the rule of law. This will involve, at all government levels, precise activity planning, setting priorities, adopting measures and ensuring an adequate allocation of the necessary financial and human resources. The Commission will continue its various monitoring activities until accession.

Financial assistance : The EU will continue to provide substantial financial assistance to both countries in order to help them prepare for membership. In 2006 approximately EUR 1 155 million will be reserved for Romania and approximately EUR 545 million for Bulgaria.

Depending on the nature of the problem, EU support could take the form of peer assistance, training seminars, advice missions, twinning (light) projects or similar instruments, which can be mobilized quickly and can be focused on well-targeted issues. Equally, a number of existing EU programmes (such as Customs 2007, Fiscalis, and other programmes) can be used to address gaps in both countries.

Next steps : The main remaining problems will be followed up in warning letters. On-site peer reviews and specific consultations will be held to ascertain the steps taken by Bulgaria and Romania; where needed, the Union will rapidly mobilise targeted assistance. The results of this follow-up will feed into a monitoring report which the Commission intends to present to the Council and Parliament in April/May 2006. At that moment, the Commission may recommend that the Council postpone the accession of Bulgaria or Romania until 1 January 2008 if there is a serious risk of any of those states being manifestly unprepared to meet the requirements of membership by January 2007 in a number of important areas. The Commission expects Bulgaria and Romania to take all necessary corrective actions until then so as to avoid having to issue such a recommendation.

Conclusion : The Report shows that both countries have made good progress in their preparations. They should be able to meet the requirements of EU membership at the envisaged date of accession on 1 January 2007 provided they concentrate all efforts on the reforms, with particular attention to their actual implementation.

2005/07/06
   CofR - Committee of the Regions: opinion
2005/03/10
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2005/01/19
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2004/12/16
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report by Pierre MOSCOVICI (PES, FR) stating that Romania fulfils the political and economic criteria for accession, but that it still has to make important efforts to fulfil its obligations on time. (Please see the summary of 30/11/2004.)

Parliament discussed, in particular, the areas of justice and home affairs as regards combating corruption and organised crime and as regards border checks; the area of competition as regards state aid, and also in the field of the environment as regards the implementation of legislation in all sectors and the alignment of horizontal legislation.

On the political situation and criteria, Parliament expressed concern about the following matters:

- the Commission's finding referring to official surveys which confirm that the executive continues to influence the outcome of judicial proceedings, and renewed its call for the judicial system to be made more independent and professional;

- the registration of alternative political organizations representing national minorities has encountered considerable administrative obstacles, preventing them from participating in elections;

- corruption remained a matter of serious concern;

- the fact that people with mental disabilities are subjected to arbitrary detention in mental hospitals and at the inadequacy of conditions and lack of appropriate care in many mental hospitals and other residential institutions for people with mental disabilities;

- the Commission's view that violence and de facto discrimination against the Roma minority, even in official institutions, are still very widespread.

On economic criteria, Parliament called on Romania to:

- make the improvements required to bolster macroeconomic stability and consolidate the structural reforms; it pointed out that, in order to continue reducing the public sector deficit, it is necessary to ensure financial discipline, continuously adjusting energy prices so as to enable costs to be covered and improving the financial performance of public enterprises;

On the acquis, Parliament felt that Romania has achieved a satisfactory degree of alignment in the vast majority of areas and that, if it continues to advance at the current rate and honours its undertakings, it will have every prospect of completing the requisite legislative transposition before the scheduled accession date. Romania must do much more to implement the legislation in all sectors related to the environment. It must also improve the alignment of horizontal environmental legislation, especially in the sectors of air quality, waste management, water quality and nature conservation, and in a number of other sectors.

2004/12/16
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2004/12/16
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report by Pierre MOSCOVICI (PES, FR) stating that Romania fulfils the political and economic criteria for accession, but that it still has to make important efforts to fulfil its obligations on time. (Please see the summary of 30/11/2004.)

Parliament discussed, in particular, the areas of justice and home affairs as regards combating corruption and organised crime and as regards border checks; the area of competition as regards state aid, and also in the field of the environment as regards the implementation of legislation in all sectors and the alignment of horizontal legislation.

On the political situation and criteria, Parliament expressed concern about the following matters:

- the Commission's finding referring to official surveys which confirm that the executive continues to influence the outcome of judicial proceedings, and renewed its call for the judicial system to be made more independent and professional;

- the registration of alternative political organizations representing national minorities has encountered considerable administrative obstacles, preventing them from participating in elections;

- corruption remained a matter of serious concern;

- the fact that people with mental disabilities are subjected to arbitrary detention in mental hospitals and at the inadequacy of conditions and lack of appropriate care in many mental hospitals and other residential institutions for people with mental disabilities;

- the Commission's view that violence and de facto discrimination against the Roma minority, even in official institutions, are still very widespread.

On economic criteria, Parliament called on Romania to:

- make the improvements required to bolster macroeconomic stability and consolidate the structural reforms; it pointed out that, in order to continue reducing the public sector deficit, it is necessary to ensure financial discipline, continuously adjusting energy prices so as to enable costs to be covered and improving the financial performance of public enterprises;

On the acquis, Parliament felt that Romania has achieved a satisfactory degree of alignment in the vast majority of areas and that, if it continues to advance at the current rate and honours its undertakings, it will have every prospect of completing the requisite legislative transposition before the scheduled accession date. Romania must do much more to implement the legislation in all sectors related to the environment. It must also improve the alignment of horizontal environmental legislation, especially in the sectors of air quality, waste management, water quality and nature conservation, and in a number of other sectors.

Documents
2004/12/16
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2004/12/15
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2004/12/03
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2004/12/03
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2004/11/30
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report by Pierre MOSCOVICI (PES, FR) on Romania's progress towards EU membership. It wanted to see negotiations concluded rapidly (by the end of 2004), to enable the accession treaty to be signed "as early as possible in 2005" and enter into force on 1 January 2007. However, MEPs drew Romania's attention to the fact that, like Bulgaria, it could be made subject to a specific safeguard mechanism whereby the Commission could recommend that accession be put back by one year if it believed there was a "serious risk that Romania might not be able to fulfil the obligations deriving from accession".

The committee acknowledged that Romania met the Copenhagen political criteria and had strengthened the stability of its institutions, thereby guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law and human rights. However it pointed to the need for "further reforms in the spheres of justice and public administration and greater efforts to combat corruption".

The report congratulated Romania on the progress it had made on administrative and judicial reform and on the launch of a strategy to reform its public administration. Romania was urged to press ahead swiftly with these reforms "as a priority". On the judicial front, the committee voiced disquiet at recent official surveys showing that the executive continued to influence the outcome of judicial proceedings, and it renewed its call for the judicial system to be made more independent and professional.

MEPs were also alarmed at the growing number of serious physical assaults on investigative journalists and said that further efforts were needed to guarantee the independence of the media and "the complete assertion of freedom of expression".

The report noted that corruption was still a major source of concern and expressed alarm at the fact that very few corruption trials in Romania were successful. It also underlined the need for specific law enforcement measures to combat people-trafficking and for improved controls at the borders with Ukraine, Moldova and the Black Sea. Romania was praised for introducing national child protection standards and strict rules to govern inter-country adoption although MEPs warned that these must be properly enforced. They also urged the Romanian Government to expand its efforts at combating discrimination against the Roma minority, which was still "very widespread", and give priority to education.

As regards bringing national laws into line with Community legislation, the report stated that Romania had achieved "a satisfactory degree of alignment in the vast majority of areas" and that, if it continued to advance at the current rate, it would have "every prospect of completing the requisite legislative transposition before the scheduled accession date". However, MEPs stressed that improvements to legislation and the adoption of action plans were not enough - mechanisms for implementing and monitoring the enforcement of legislation in all areas were also needed, so that progress could be assessed.

Lastly, the committee pointed out that poverty remained an extremely serious problem in Romania, although it praised the government's efforts to set up a substantial body of social welfare legislation.

2004/11/25
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2004/11/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2004/10/26
   EP - DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2004/10/06
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE : to present the 2004 Regular Report on Romania's progress towards accession.

CONTENT : this Report provides an overall assessment of the situation for each of the aspects under consideration, setting out for each of them the main steps still to be taken by Romania in preparing for accession.

- Political criteria : since the Commission concluded in its 1997 Opinion that Romania fulfilled the political criteria, the country has further consolidated and deepened the stability of its institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for and protection of minorities. This trend has accelerated over the past year. Romania continues to fulfil the political criteria.

Progress was made to address the need for administrative and judicial reforms. A public administration reform strategy was launched in May 2004, covering the area of civil service reform, decentralisation and deconcentration, and policy co-ordination. A positive start was made to the reform of the civil service. Further efforts are also needed to strengthen local and regional governance with a view to ensuring proper implementation of the acquis at those levels. Moreover, the management of court cases and the quality of judgments needs to improve. Corruption in Romania continues to be serious and widespread. Romania's anti-corruption legislation is generally well developed, but its ability to curb corruption will depend on the effective implementation of the law. In particular, additional efforts are required to ensure the independence, effectiveness and accountability of the National Anti-Corruption Prosecution Office. It should concentrate its resources on investigating high-level corruption.

Romania continues to respect human rights and fundamental freedoms and has made further progress in several areas. The introduction of national standards for child protection services and of strict rules on inter-country adoption, which appear to be in line with the UN Convention on the rights of the child, should further improve the protection of children's rights. As regards freedom of expression, the legal situation of journalists has improved but the economic situation of many mass media organisations remains precarious and further efforts are necessary to guarantee media independence.

The Roma Strategy, which is explicitly aimed at addressing discrimination, is being implemented but de facto discrimination against the Roma minority remains widespread. The support for an inclusive approach to education is a positive development. The same encouraging trend has been noted in health care and employment.

- Economic criteria : the 1997 Opinion already acknowledged the substantial reform efforts undertaken by the Romanian authorities to transform their economy. Since the Opinion economic structure and performance have significantly improved. Macroeconomic stability has been achieved, profound economic reforms have been carried out while the Romanian authorities' commitment to the economic requirements of EU accession has been sustained. Hence, it is concluded that Romania complies with the criterion of being a functioning market economy. Vigorous implementation of its structural reform programme should enable Romania to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union.

Improvements can be made in sustaining macroeconomic stability and in deepening structural reforms. Priority should be given to preserve the momentum in disinflation and safeguard the sustainability of the external position by maintaining a prudent policy mix and by further reducing the deficit of the broader public sector. Fiscal sustainability needs to be strengthened by advancing expenditure reform and further improving tax compliance. The privatisation process should be accomplished, post-privatisation disputes be settled and non-viable enterprises more actively dismantled.

In key sectors, such as energy, mining and transport, perseverance in restructuring and a more manifest strive for privatisation should go hand in hand.

- Implementation of the acquis : Romania has made good progress in adopting the acquis and more recently, has also made progress in gradually building up the administrative capacity to implement and effectively enforce the acquis. Over the past year, Romania has made further progress in the vast majority of the chapters of the acquis and is on track to complete the required legislative transposition before the planned date of accession if the current pace of progress is maintained. Overall, alignment with the acquis has reached a fair level in the large majority of areas. The administrative capacity has been strengthened in the majority of areas but there is still room for improvement since not all the necessary institutions are yet in place. In order to cover the remaining gaps, due attention should be given to the full and timely implementation of the strategies and action plans for the reinforcement of administrative capacity already approved in these areas:

- internal market, (transposition of the public procurement legislation must be completed. In addition, practices which put Romania's commitment to open and transparent procurement procedures into question should be discontinued);

- free movement of capital(outstanding restrictions to capital movements and payments should be removed and the enforcement record of the National Office for the Prevention and Control of Money Laundering needs to be improved);

- agricultural, veterinary and phytosanitary acquis (particular attention should be paid to reinforcing the SAPARD Agency and to establishing the necessary elements of a functioning IACS) ;

social policy and employment (efforts should now focus on completing legislative alignment in the area of labour law and on strengthening the Labour Inspectorate to ensure proper implementation in the area of health and safety at work);

- industrial policy (the key challenge here is its implementation as structural weaknesses limit the capacity for enforcement. Transparency of the privatisation process should be fully ensured);

- regional policy and co-ordination of structural instruments (efforts need to be continued to bring the administrative capacity up to the level required in order for Romania to reap full benefits of the structural instruments);

- consumer and health protection is well on track and Romania has made good progress as regards improvement of administrative capacity and the general co-ordination of market surveillance activities. These efforts should be maintained and consumer movement should be strengthened.

- justice and home affairs (implementation capacity should be significantly strengthened in almost all areas, as should inter-agency co-operation). As regards the fight against corruption, implementation capacity should also be significantly strengthened and the existing legislation should be rigorously enforced:

- customs.

In a number of important sectors, the overall capacity of the public administration to implement and enforce the newly adopted legislation should be enhanced. Furthermore, there are a number of areas where further efforts will be needed to complete the work, in particular as regards company law, competition policy, environment and justice and home affairs, customs and financial control.

In the accession negotiations, 27 chapters have been provisionally closed. Romania is generally meeting the commitments that it has made during the negotiations, although delays have been noted in specific areas.

In conclusion, the Commission expects Romania to assume the obligations of membership in accordance with the envisaged timeframe. In the period leading up to accession, Romania needs to continue its preparations, in line with the commitments it has made in the accession negotiations.

2004/10/06
   EC - Supplementary non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE : to present the Strategy Paper of the European Commission on progress in the enlargement process - revision of the a pre-accession strategy for Croatia.

CONTENT : the enlargement of the EU to ten new Member States on 1 May 2004 has further strengthened the unity of the European continent. The historical and political arguments in favour of this enlargement are compelling: it enhances peace, prosperity, stability and security and has also produced substantial economic benefits.

The Commission proposes this new strategy paper for the actual candidates as well as Croatia whose candidature was accepted in June 2004. It also presents the content of a pre-accession strategy for Croatia including financial instruments.

Bulgaria and Romania are an integral part of this enlargement process which was launched in 1997. Both countries are close to completing the negotiations. The EU's objective is to welcome both countries in January 2007 as members, if they are ready.

The Regular Reports point to a number of areas where further improvements need to be made in the context of the political and economic criteria and in relationship to the adoption, implementation and enforcement of the acquis. These should be vigorously pursued in order to remedy before accession the shortcomings identified. In order to analyse progress and to facilitate successful membership of the European Union, the Commission will conduct an enhanced monitoring and regularly report to the Council. The Commission will issue as from November 2005 yearly comprehensive monitoring reports for the Council and the Parliament. The Commission considers that a specific safeguard needs to be introduced in the Accession Treaty which would allow the Commission to recommend to the Council to postpone the date of accession of either Bulgaria or Romania by one year to January 2008 if there is clear evidence that there is a serious risk that Bulgaria or Romania will be manifestly unprepared to meet the requirements of membership by 1 January 2007 in a number of important areas. The Commission recommends extending to Croatia the reinforced pre-accession strategy for candidate countries decided by the European Council in Luxembourg in December 1997.

CROATIA : the Brussels European Council in June 2004 concluded that Croatia is a candidate country

with which accession negotiations will start in early 2005 and requested the Commission to prepare a pre-accession strategy for Croatia. The Commission considers that the reinforced pre-accession strategy for candidate countries decided by the European Council in Luxembourg in December 1997 should be extended to Croatia. The elements of this strategy are outlined below.

The review procedure aimed at assessing candidate countries' progress towards membership will start to be applied to Croatia as of 2005. This will mean that the Commission will start issuing Regular Reports on Croatia as from autumn 2005. In the context of the Stabilisation and Association Process, the Commission has already proposed a European Partnership, based on the findings of its Opinion on Croatia's application for membership. This document will guide Croatia's accession preparations.

Croatia as a candidate country should benefit from all three pre-accession financial instruments: Phare for institution-building and economic and social cohesion, ISPA for environment and transport, and SAPARD for rural development. The Commission will propose amendments to the regulations for these three pre-accession instruments in order to extend their scope to Croatia as of 1 January 2005. Taking into account the needs for an adequate preparation of Croatia for accession, the Commission recommends that EUR 105 million (EUR 80 million for Phare and EUR 25 million for ISPA) are allocated to Croatia in 2005 and EUR 140 million in 2006 (EUR 80 million for Phare, EUR 35 million for ISPA, and EUR 25 million for SAPARD). These amounts will be financed out of the pre-accession funds available under heading 7 of the current financial perspectives. The Commission has proposed to Council to create a new pre-accession instrument (IPA), from which Croatia would benefit from 2007 onwards, building on the present pre-accession instruments Phare, ISPA and SAPARD. The amounts to

be allocated to Croatia from 2007 onwards will be decided in the context of the next financial perspective.

The Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) signed with Croatia in October 2001 has now been ratified. In order to implement the trade-related aspects of the SAA, an Interim Agreement entered into force in March 2002. A Stabilisation and Association Council, Committee and Sub-Committees will be set up. The Commission proposes that the structures of the SAA be used not only to cover issues related to the implementation of the agreement, but also to serve as forums for the explanation of the acquis and review progress made by Croatia in the alignment of the acquis in line with commitments taken in the negotiations. The framework agreement allowing Croatia's participation in Community programmes and agencies should come into force in the first half of 2005, after ratification by the EU

institutions and Croatia. Croatia's financial contribution to each programme can be partly funded by Phare. In addition to the above mentioned elements for a reinforced pre-accession strategy, the

Commission considers that an enhanced political dialogue with Croatia should continue in order to tackle the issues highlighted in the Opinion. Such issues include the relations with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, minority rights, return of refugees, judiciary reform, regional co-operation and the fight against corruption. In particular, Croatia needs to remain committed to regional cooperation within the framework of the Stabilisation and Association Process for the Western Balkans. The Commission will closely monitor these issues in regular meetings with the Croatian authorities and will keep the Council informed.

The Brussels European Council in June 2004 decided that in advance of negotiations with Croatia, the Council will agree a general negotiating framework, taking full account of the experience of the fifth enlargement process. The Commission suggests that the framework should build on certain principles: - - the negotiations with Croatia should be guided by the conditions for accession as defined at the Copenhagen European Council in 1993. These conditions are adequate tools for measuring a candidate country's preparedness for meeting the obligations of membership, and provide for clear guidance in the reform process;

- progress in the negotiations will be fully dependent on the sustainability of political reforms and Croatia's fulfillment of its obligations in respect of regional cooperation with the other countries of former Yugoslavia and other related international obligations such as cooperation with ICTY;

- lastly, in line with the Treaty on European Union and the Constitution for Europe, the Commission will recommend the suspension of negotiations in the case of a serious and persistent breach of the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the rule of law on which the Union is founded. The Council should be able to decide on such recommendation by a qualified majority of Member States.

2004/10/05
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE : to present the 2004 Regular Report on Romania's progress towards accession.

CONTENT : this Report provides an overall assessment of the situation for each of the aspects under consideration, setting out for each of them the main steps still to be taken by Romania in preparing for accession.

- Political criteria : since the Commission concluded in its 1997 Opinion that Romania fulfilled the political criteria, the country has further consolidated and deepened the stability of its institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for and protection of minorities. This trend has accelerated over the past year. Romania continues to fulfil the political criteria.

Progress was made to address the need for administrative and judicial reforms. A public administration reform strategy was launched in May 2004, covering the area of civil service reform, decentralisation and deconcentration, and policy co-ordination. A positive start was made to the reform of the civil service. Further efforts are also needed to strengthen local and regional governance with a view to ensuring proper implementation of the acquis at those levels. Moreover, the management of court cases and the quality of judgments needs to improve. Corruption in Romania continues to be serious and widespread. Romania's anti-corruption legislation is generally well developed, but its ability to curb corruption will depend on the effective implementation of the law. In particular, additional efforts are required to ensure the independence, effectiveness and accountability of the National Anti-Corruption Prosecution Office. It should concentrate its resources on investigating high-level corruption.

Romania continues to respect human rights and fundamental freedoms and has made further progress in several areas. The introduction of national standards for child protection services and of strict rules on inter-country adoption, which appear to be in line with the UN Convention on the rights of the child, should further improve the protection of children's rights. As regards freedom of expression, the legal situation of journalists has improved but the economic situation of many mass media organisations remains precarious and further efforts are necessary to guarantee media independence.

The Roma Strategy, which is explicitly aimed at addressing discrimination, is being implemented but de facto discrimination against the Roma minority remains widespread. The support for an inclusive approach to education is a positive development. The same encouraging trend has been noted in health care and employment.

- Economic criteria : the 1997 Opinion already acknowledged the substantial reform efforts undertaken by the Romanian authorities to transform their economy. Since the Opinion economic structure and performance have significantly improved. Macroeconomic stability has been achieved, profound economic reforms have been carried out while the Romanian authorities' commitment to the economic requirements of EU accession has been sustained. Hence, it is concluded that Romania complies with the criterion of being a functioning market economy. Vigorous implementation of its structural reform programme should enable Romania to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union.

Improvements can be made in sustaining macroeconomic stability and in deepening structural reforms. Priority should be given to preserve the momentum in disinflation and safeguard the sustainability of the external position by maintaining a prudent policy mix and by further reducing the deficit of the broader public sector. Fiscal sustainability needs to be strengthened by advancing expenditure reform and further improving tax compliance. The privatisation process should be accomplished, post-privatisation disputes be settled and non-viable enterprises more actively dismantled.

In key sectors, such as energy, mining and transport, perseverance in restructuring and a more manifest strive for privatisation should go hand in hand.

- Implementation of the acquis : Romania has made good progress in adopting the acquis and more recently, has also made progress in gradually building up the administrative capacity to implement and effectively enforce the acquis. Over the past year, Romania has made further progress in the vast majority of the chapters of the acquis and is on track to complete the required legislative transposition before the planned date of accession if the current pace of progress is maintained. Overall, alignment with the acquis has reached a fair level in the large majority of areas. The administrative capacity has been strengthened in the majority of areas but there is still room for improvement since not all the necessary institutions are yet in place. In order to cover the remaining gaps, due attention should be given to the full and timely implementation of the strategies and action plans for the reinforcement of administrative capacity already approved in these areas:

- internal market, (transposition of the public procurement legislation must be completed. In addition, practices which put Romania's commitment to open and transparent procurement procedures into question should be discontinued);

- free movement of capital(outstanding restrictions to capital movements and payments should be removed and the enforcement record of the National Office for the Prevention and Control of Money Laundering needs to be improved);

- agricultural, veterinary and phytosanitary acquis (particular attention should be paid to reinforcing the SAPARD Agency and to establishing the necessary elements of a functioning IACS) ;

social policy and employment (efforts should now focus on completing legislative alignment in the area of labour law and on strengthening the Labour Inspectorate to ensure proper implementation in the area of health and safety at work);

- industrial policy (the key challenge here is its implementation as structural weaknesses limit the capacity for enforcement. Transparency of the privatisation process should be fully ensured);

- regional policy and co-ordination of structural instruments (efforts need to be continued to bring the administrative capacity up to the level required in order for Romania to reap full benefits of the structural instruments);

- consumer and health protection is well on track and Romania has made good progress as regards improvement of administrative capacity and the general co-ordination of market surveillance activities. These efforts should be maintained and consumer movement should be strengthened.

- justice and home affairs (implementation capacity should be significantly strengthened in almost all areas, as should inter-agency co-operation). As regards the fight against corruption, implementation capacity should also be significantly strengthened and the existing legislation should be rigorously enforced:

- customs.

In a number of important sectors, the overall capacity of the public administration to implement and enforce the newly adopted legislation should be enhanced. Furthermore, there are a number of areas where further efforts will be needed to complete the work, in particular as regards company law, competition policy, environment and justice and home affairs, customs and financial control.

In the accession negotiations, 27 chapters have been provisionally closed. Romania is generally meeting the commitments that it has made during the negotiations, although delays have been noted in specific areas.

In conclusion, the Commission expects Romania to assume the obligations of membership in accordance with the envisaged timeframe. In the period leading up to accession, Romania needs to continue its preparations, in line with the commitments it has made in the accession negotiations.

2004/09/13
   EP - MOSCOVICI Pierre (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Votes

Rapport Moscovici A6-0061/2004 - am. 8 #

2004/12/16 Outcome: -: 406, +: 106, 0: 22
DE HU SK LU NL SI LV EE AT DK MT CY SE IE LT FI EL BE CZ PT ES IT PL FR GB
Total
85
15
11
5
18
7
7
3
15
10
4
5
12
9
11
11
19
18
19
23
33
42
41
56
55
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
33

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: NI NI
23

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

3

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
24

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
21

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ALDE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Poland ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
187

Luxembourg PPE-DE

For (1)

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Austria PPE-DE

Against (2)

4

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Finland PPE-DE

3
icon: PSE PSE
161

Slovakia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (2)

2

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

2

Finland PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

Rapport Moscovici A6-0061/2004 - am. 25 #

2004/12/16 Outcome: -: 414, +: 113, 0: 28
DE HU NL LU LV AT EE MT SI CY SE SK DK IE LT FI BE EL CZ PT ES IT PL FR GB
Total
86
21
17
5
7
15
4
4
7
5
12
11
10
10
11
11
18
22
18
23
34
42
46
57
59
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: NI NI
22

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
24

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
21

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Hungary ALDE

2

Netherlands ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
200

Luxembourg PPE-DE

For (1)

3

Latvia PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

For (1)

4

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

4

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Finland PPE-DE

3
icon: PSE PSE
164

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

Rapport Moscovici A6-0061/2004 - am. 17,1 #

2004/12/16 Outcome: -: 320, +: 218, 0: 17
DE GB NL LV HU LT CZ CY FI LU SI EE DK IE BE MT SK AT SE IT PT EL FR PL ES
Total
84
58
18
7
21
11
19
5
10
5
7
4
10
10
19
4
12
15
13
42
22
22
57
46
34
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Latvia ALDE

1
2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: UEN UEN
21

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2
icon: NI NI
24

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

3

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
24

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (2)

2

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
200

Latvia PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Finland PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

For (1)

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

4

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

4

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Austria PPE-DE

For (1)

4
icon: PSE PSE
164

Lithuania PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

Against (2)

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Rapport Moscovici A6-0061/2004 - am. 17,2 #

2004/12/16 Outcome: -: 389, +: 144, 0: 20
GB NL HU LU AT CZ SK EE MT DK LV CY SE IE SI DE FI LT BE EL PT PL ES IT FR
Total
59
18
19
5
15
19
12
4
4
10
7
5
13
10
7
84
9
11
19
21
23
46
33
43
57
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
24

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
24

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

3

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
21

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Netherlands ALDE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
200

Luxembourg PPE-DE

For (1)

3

Austria PPE-DE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Ireland PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

4

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Finland PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

1
icon: PSE PSE
162

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Estonia PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (2)

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Rapport Moscovici A6-0061/2004 - am. 17,3 #

2004/12/16 Outcome: -: 388, +: 141, 0: 18
DE NL HU CZ AT LU SK DK GB EE MT SI LV CY SE IE FI LT BE EL PT ES IT FR PL
Total
83
18
18
18
15
5
12
10
59
4
4
7
7
5
13
10
9
11
18
21
23
34
41
57
45
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2
icon: NI NI
24

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
24

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
21

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
25

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Italy GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
199

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE-DE

For (1)

3

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

For (1)

4

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Ireland PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

4

Finland PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Hungary ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
160

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Estonia PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Rapport Moscovici A6-0061/2004 - am. 6 #

2004/12/16 Outcome: -: 329, +: 205, 0: 16
DE HU NL LV LT GB CZ SI DK SK LU EE CY AT IE MT SE FI BE IT PT EL PL ES FR
Total
84
21
19
7
11
54
19
7
10
12
5
4
5
15
10
4
13
11
18
41
23
22
45
34
56
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
57
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1

Belgium ALDE

4
icon: UEN UEN
21

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2
icon: NI NI
23

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
24

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
198

Latvia PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

For (1)

4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

For (1)

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

4
4

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Finland PPE-DE

3
icon: PSE PSE
163

Lithuania PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

Against (2)

2

Finland PSE

Abstain (1)

3

Rapport Moscovici A6-0061/2004 - am. 22 #

2004/12/16 Outcome: -: 355, +: 162, 0: 20
DE NL HU LV CZ LU SK AT EE DK MT GB SI CY IE SE FI LT BE PT EL IT ES FR PL
Total
84
17
19
7
18
5
12
14
4
8
4
53
7
5
10
12
11
11
18
22
22
41
34
55
44
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Italy GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: UEN UEN
21

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: NI NI
23

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
23

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
195

Latvia PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

For (1)

3

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

4

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

For (1)

4

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
4

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Finland PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Hungary ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
154

Netherlands PSE

3

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Estonia PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania PSE

2

Rapport Moscovici A6-0061/2004 - am. 24 #

2004/12/16 Outcome: -: 380, +: 135, 0: 18
DE HU AT LU NL CY SK LV SE SI EE MT DK FI IE CZ LT BE EL PT IT ES FR GB PL
Total
81
19
15
4
17
5
12
7
12
6
4
4
10
11
10
19
11
16
22
22
41
34
54
52
45
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
22

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: UEN UEN
21

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
24

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
52

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Belgium ALDE

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
194

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE-DE

For (1)

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

For (1)

4

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE-DE

3
4

Lithuania PPE-DE

1
icon: PSE PSE
157

Slovakia PSE

2

Estonia PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (2)

2

Finland PSE

For (1)

3

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2004-10-06T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/1
date
2004-11-09T00:00:00
docs
title: PE349.831
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/2
date
2004-11-25T00:00:00
docs
title: PE349.903
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/2
date
2004-11-12T00:00:00
docs
title: PE349.968
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-349903_EN.html
docs/3
date
2004-11-25T00:00:00
docs
title: PE349.903
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/8
date
2005-10-25T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0534/COM_COM(2005)0534_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0534/COM_COM(2005)0534_EN.pdf
docs/9
date
2005-10-25T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
events/0
date
2004-10-05T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2004-10-06T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0657/COM_COM(2004)0657_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0657/COM_COM(2004)0657_EN.pdf
docs/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE349.903
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2004-0061_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2004-0061_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2004-0111_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2004-0111_EN.html
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0496)(documentyear:2004)(documentlanguage:EN)
New
https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0496)(documentyear:2004)(documentlanguage:EN)
docs/9
date
2005-10-25T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/9
date
2005-10-25T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2004/1200/COM_SEC(2004)1200_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2004/1200/COM_SEC(2004)1200_EN.pdf
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2004-12-03T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2004-0061_EN.html title: A6-0061/2004
events/3
date
2004-12-03T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2004-0061_EN.html title: A6-0061/2004
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20041215&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20041215&type=CRE
events/6
date
2004-12-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2004-0111_EN.html title: T6-0111/2004
summary
events/6
date
2004-12-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2004-0111_EN.html title: T6-0111/2004
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: MOSCOVICI Pierre date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2004-09-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MOSCOVICI Pierre group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2004-10-26T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0657/COM_COM(2004)0657_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0657/COM_COM(2004)0657_EN.pdf
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE349.903&secondRef=02
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE349.903
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2004-61&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2004-0061_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2004-111
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2004-0111_EN.html
docs/6/body
EC
docs/7/body
EC
docs/9
date
2005-10-25T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/9
date
2005-10-25T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2004-61&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2004-0061_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2004-111
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2004-0111_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2004-10-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2004/1200/COM_SEC(2004)1200_EN.pdf type: Non-legislative basic document published title: SEC(2004)1200 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: MOSCOVICI Pierre body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2004-11-30T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: MOSCOVICI Pierre body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2004-12-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2004-61&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0061/2004 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2004-12-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20041215&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2004-12-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3721&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2004-111 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0111/2004 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2004-09-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MOSCOVICI Pierre group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2004-09-13T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: PSE name: MOSCOVICI Pierre
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2004-10-26T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2004-10-26T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: PSE name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/9
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/9
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/10
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/10
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
committees/11
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/11
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/12
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
committees/12
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
committees/13
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
opinion
False
committees/13
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/14
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
opinion
False
committees/14
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/15
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/15
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
opinion
False
committees/16
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/17
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
opinion
False
committees/17
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
committees/18
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
committees/18
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
committees/19
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
opinion
False
committees/19
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
docs
  • date: 2004-10-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0657/COM_COM(2004)0657_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0657 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=657 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE : to present the Strategy Paper of the European Commission on progress in the enlargement process - revision of the a pre-accession strategy for Croatia. CONTENT : the enlargement of the EU to ten new Member States on 1 May 2004 has further strengthened the unity of the European continent. The historical and political arguments in favour of this enlargement are compelling: it enhances peace, prosperity, stability and security and has also produced substantial economic benefits. The Commission proposes this new strategy paper for the actual candidates as well as Croatia whose candidature was accepted in June 2004. It also presents the content of a pre-accession strategy for Croatia including financial instruments. Bulgaria and Romania are an integral part of this enlargement process which was launched in 1997. Both countries are close to completing the negotiations. The EU's objective is to welcome both countries in January 2007 as members, if they are ready. The Regular Reports point to a number of areas where further improvements need to be made in the context of the political and economic criteria and in relationship to the adoption, implementation and enforcement of the acquis. These should be vigorously pursued in order to remedy before accession the shortcomings identified. In order to analyse progress and to facilitate successful membership of the European Union, the Commission will conduct an enhanced monitoring and regularly report to the Council. The Commission will issue as from November 2005 yearly comprehensive monitoring reports for the Council and the Parliament. The Commission considers that a specific safeguard needs to be introduced in the Accession Treaty which would allow the Commission to recommend to the Council to postpone the date of accession of either Bulgaria or Romania by one year to January 2008 if there is clear evidence that there is a serious risk that Bulgaria or Romania will be manifestly unprepared to meet the requirements of membership by 1 January 2007 in a number of important areas. The Commission recommends extending to Croatia the reinforced pre-accession strategy for candidate countries decided by the European Council in Luxembourg in December 1997. CROATIA : the Brussels European Council in June 2004 concluded that Croatia is a candidate country with which accession negotiations will start in early 2005 and requested the Commission to prepare a pre-accession strategy for Croatia. The Commission considers that the reinforced pre-accession strategy for candidate countries decided by the European Council in Luxembourg in December 1997 should be extended to Croatia. The elements of this strategy are outlined below. The review procedure aimed at assessing candidate countries' progress towards membership will start to be applied to Croatia as of 2005. This will mean that the Commission will start issuing Regular Reports on Croatia as from autumn 2005. In the context of the Stabilisation and Association Process, the Commission has already proposed a European Partnership, based on the findings of its Opinion on Croatia's application for membership. This document will guide Croatia's accession preparations. Croatia as a candidate country should benefit from all three pre-accession financial instruments: Phare for institution-building and economic and social cohesion, ISPA for environment and transport, and SAPARD for rural development. The Commission will propose amendments to the regulations for these three pre-accession instruments in order to extend their scope to Croatia as of 1 January 2005. Taking into account the needs for an adequate preparation of Croatia for accession, the Commission recommends that EUR 105 million (EUR 80 million for Phare and EUR 25 million for ISPA) are allocated to Croatia in 2005 and EUR 140 million in 2006 (EUR 80 million for Phare, EUR 35 million for ISPA, and EUR 25 million for SAPARD). These amounts will be financed out of the pre-accession funds available under heading 7 of the current financial perspectives. The Commission has proposed to Council to create a new pre-accession instrument (IPA), from which Croatia would benefit from 2007 onwards, building on the present pre-accession instruments Phare, ISPA and SAPARD. The amounts to be allocated to Croatia from 2007 onwards will be decided in the context of the next financial perspective. The Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) signed with Croatia in October 2001 has now been ratified. In order to implement the trade-related aspects of the SAA, an Interim Agreement entered into force in March 2002. A Stabilisation and Association Council, Committee and Sub-Committees will be set up. The Commission proposes that the structures of the SAA be used not only to cover issues related to the implementation of the agreement, but also to serve as forums for the explanation of the acquis and review progress made by Croatia in the alignment of the acquis in line with commitments taken in the negotiations. The framework agreement allowing Croatia's participation in Community programmes and agencies should come into force in the first half of 2005, after ratification by the EU institutions and Croatia. Croatia's financial contribution to each programme can be partly funded by Phare. In addition to the above mentioned elements for a reinforced pre-accession strategy, the Commission considers that an enhanced political dialogue with Croatia should continue in order to tackle the issues highlighted in the Opinion. Such issues include the relations with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, minority rights, return of refugees, judiciary reform, regional co-operation and the fight against corruption. In particular, Croatia needs to remain committed to regional cooperation within the framework of the Stabilisation and Association Process for the Western Balkans. The Commission will closely monitor these issues in regular meetings with the Croatian authorities and will keep the Council informed. The Brussels European Council in June 2004 decided that in advance of negotiations with Croatia, the Council will agree a general negotiating framework, taking full account of the experience of the fifth enlargement process. The Commission suggests that the framework should build on certain principles: - - the negotiations with Croatia should be guided by the conditions for accession as defined at the Copenhagen European Council in 1993. These conditions are adequate tools for measuring a candidate country's preparedness for meeting the obligations of membership, and provide for clear guidance in the reform process; - progress in the negotiations will be fully dependent on the sustainability of political reforms and Croatia's fulfillment of its obligations in respect of regional cooperation with the other countries of former Yugoslavia and other related international obligations such as cooperation with ICTY; - lastly, in line with the Treaty on European Union and the Constitution for Europe, the Commission will recommend the suspension of negotiations in the case of a serious and persistent breach of the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the rule of law on which the Union is founded. The Council should be able to decide on such recommendation by a qualified majority of Member States. type: Supplementary non-legislative basic document body: EC
  • date: 2004-11-09T00:00:00 docs: title: PE349.831 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2004-11-12T00:00:00 docs: title: PE349.968 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2004-11-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE349.903&secondRef=02 title: PE349.903 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2004-12-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2004-61&language=EN title: A6-0061/2004 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2004-12-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2004-111 title: T6-0111/2004 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:226E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 226 15.09.2005, p. 0245-0353 E summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report by Pierre MOSCOVICI (PES, FR) stating that Romania fulfils the political and economic criteria for accession, but that it still has to make important efforts to fulfil its obligations on time. (Please see the summary of 30/11/2004.) Parliament discussed, in particular, the areas of justice and home affairs as regards combating corruption and organised crime and as regards border checks; the area of competition as regards state aid, and also in the field of the environment as regards the implementation of legislation in all sectors and the alignment of horizontal legislation. On the political situation and criteria, Parliament expressed concern about the following matters: - the Commission's finding referring to official surveys which confirm that the executive continues to influence the outcome of judicial proceedings, and renewed its call for the judicial system to be made more independent and professional; - the registration of alternative political organizations representing national minorities has encountered considerable administrative obstacles, preventing them from participating in elections; - corruption remained a matter of serious concern; - the fact that people with mental disabilities are subjected to arbitrary detention in mental hospitals and at the inadequacy of conditions and lack of appropriate care in many mental hospitals and other residential institutions for people with mental disabilities; - the Commission's view that violence and de facto discrimination against the Roma minority, even in official institutions, are still very widespread. On economic criteria, Parliament called on Romania to: - make the improvements required to bolster macroeconomic stability and consolidate the structural reforms; it pointed out that, in order to continue reducing the public sector deficit, it is necessary to ensure financial discipline, continuously adjusting energy prices so as to enable costs to be covered and improving the financial performance of public enterprises; On the acquis, Parliament felt that Romania has achieved a satisfactory degree of alignment in the vast majority of areas and that, if it continues to advance at the current rate and honours its undertakings, it will have every prospect of completing the requisite legislative transposition before the scheduled accession date. Romania must do much more to implement the legislation in all sectors related to the environment. It must also improve the alignment of horizontal environmental legislation, especially in the sectors of air quality, waste management, water quality and nature conservation, and in a number of other sectors. type: Text adopted by Parliament, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-01-19T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=3721&j=0&l=en title: SP(2005)239 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2005-03-10T00:00:00 docs: title: SP(2005)526 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2005-07-06T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0496)(documentyear:2004)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CDR0496/2004 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2006:031:TOC title: OJ C 031 07.02.2006, p. 0015-0018 type: Committee of the Regions: opinion body: CofR
  • date: 2005-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0534/COM_COM(2005)0534_EN.pdf title: COM(2005)0534 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2005&nu_doc=534 title: EUR-Lex summary: In presenting this Report the Commission fulfils the commitment made in its 2004 Strategy Paper (please refer to the summary of the non-legislative base document of 06/10/2004 ) and responds to a request expressed by the European Council in December 2004 to continue to submit annual reports on Bulgaria and Romania’s progress towards accession, together with recommendations if appropriate. This Report assesses the countries’ preparedness for membership, identifies remaining gaps and presents steps to be taken for dealing with these (sometimes serious) gaps. It reflects the situation at the end of September 2005. Main points of the Commission’s analysis : for further details regarding the Commission’s conclusions on the level of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria and Romania, please refer to the summaries of the specific regular reports – SEC(2005)1352 and SEC(2005)1354: 1) The Commission confirms that Bulgaria and Romania meet the political criteria for membership. Nevertheless, further efforts are needed in particular to strengthen the rule of law, by improving public administration and the justice system and by fighting corruption effectively. 2) Bulgaria and Romania fulfil the requirement of being a functioning market economy. Bulgaria’s continuation of the current pace of its reform path and Romania’s vigorous implementation of its structural reform programme should enable them to withstand competitive pressure and market forces within the EU. 3) Both countries have continued to make progress in adopting and implementing EU legislation. In most areas they are well advanced. However, the Commission has also identified a number of areas where increased efforts are required. The authorities in both countries should vigorously pursue their preparations in order to ensure the full benefit of membership for their citizens. Areas of concern : There are a limited number of specific gaps in both countries’ preparations which give cause for serious concern. Without immediate action Bulgaria and Romania will most likely not be able to fulfil their obligations in those specific areas by 1 January 2007. Both countries will need to pay attention to reinforcing their administrative and judicial capacity in order to adequately implement and enforce the required legislation. Vigorous steps will need to be taken in the fight against corruption and in the reforms of the justice system and the public administration in order to ensure the proper functioning of the rule of law. This will involve, at all government levels, precise activity planning, setting priorities, adopting measures and ensuring an adequate allocation of the necessary financial and human resources. The Commission will continue its various monitoring activities until accession. Financial assistance : The EU will continue to provide substantial financial assistance to both countries in order to help them prepare for membership. In 2006 approximately EUR 1 155 million will be reserved for Romania and approximately EUR 545 million for Bulgaria. Depending on the nature of the problem, EU support could take the form of peer assistance, training seminars, advice missions, twinning (light) projects or similar instruments, which can be mobilized quickly and can be focused on well-targeted issues. Equally, a number of existing EU programmes (such as Customs 2007, Fiscalis, and other programmes) can be used to address gaps in both countries. Next steps : The main remaining problems will be followed up in warning letters. On-site peer reviews and specific consultations will be held to ascertain the steps taken by Bulgaria and Romania; where needed, the Union will rapidly mobilise targeted assistance. The results of this follow-up will feed into a monitoring report which the Commission intends to present to the Council and Parliament in April/May 2006. At that moment, the Commission may recommend that the Council postpone the accession of Bulgaria or Romania until 1 January 2008 if there is a serious risk of any of those states being manifestly unprepared to meet the requirements of membership by January 2007 in a number of important areas. The Commission expects Bulgaria and Romania to take all necessary corrective actions until then so as to avoid having to issue such a recommendation. Conclusion : The Report shows that both countries have made good progress in their preparations. They should be able to meet the requirements of EU membership at the envisaged date of accession on 1 January 2007 provided they concentrate all efforts on the reforms, with particular attention to their actual implementation. type: Follow-up document body: EC
events
  • date: 2004-10-06T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2004/1200/COM_SEC(2004)1200_EN.pdf title: SEC(2004)1200 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=1200 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE : to present the 2004 Regular Report on Romania's progress towards accession. CONTENT : this Report provides an overall assessment of the situation for each of the aspects under consideration, setting out for each of them the main steps still to be taken by Romania in preparing for accession. - Political criteria : since the Commission concluded in its 1997 Opinion that Romania fulfilled the political criteria, the country has further consolidated and deepened the stability of its institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for and protection of minorities. This trend has accelerated over the past year. Romania continues to fulfil the political criteria. Progress was made to address the need for administrative and judicial reforms. A public administration reform strategy was launched in May 2004, covering the area of civil service reform, decentralisation and deconcentration, and policy co-ordination. A positive start was made to the reform of the civil service. Further efforts are also needed to strengthen local and regional governance with a view to ensuring proper implementation of the acquis at those levels. Moreover, the management of court cases and the quality of judgments needs to improve. Corruption in Romania continues to be serious and widespread. Romania's anti-corruption legislation is generally well developed, but its ability to curb corruption will depend on the effective implementation of the law. In particular, additional efforts are required to ensure the independence, effectiveness and accountability of the National Anti-Corruption Prosecution Office. It should concentrate its resources on investigating high-level corruption. Romania continues to respect human rights and fundamental freedoms and has made further progress in several areas. The introduction of national standards for child protection services and of strict rules on inter-country adoption, which appear to be in line with the UN Convention on the rights of the child, should further improve the protection of children's rights. As regards freedom of expression, the legal situation of journalists has improved but the economic situation of many mass media organisations remains precarious and further efforts are necessary to guarantee media independence. The Roma Strategy, which is explicitly aimed at addressing discrimination, is being implemented but de facto discrimination against the Roma minority remains widespread. The support for an inclusive approach to education is a positive development. The same encouraging trend has been noted in health care and employment. - Economic criteria : the 1997 Opinion already acknowledged the substantial reform efforts undertaken by the Romanian authorities to transform their economy. Since the Opinion economic structure and performance have significantly improved. Macroeconomic stability has been achieved, profound economic reforms have been carried out while the Romanian authorities' commitment to the economic requirements of EU accession has been sustained. Hence, it is concluded that Romania complies with the criterion of being a functioning market economy. Vigorous implementation of its structural reform programme should enable Romania to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union. Improvements can be made in sustaining macroeconomic stability and in deepening structural reforms. Priority should be given to preserve the momentum in disinflation and safeguard the sustainability of the external position by maintaining a prudent policy mix and by further reducing the deficit of the broader public sector. Fiscal sustainability needs to be strengthened by advancing expenditure reform and further improving tax compliance. The privatisation process should be accomplished, post-privatisation disputes be settled and non-viable enterprises more actively dismantled. In key sectors, such as energy, mining and transport, perseverance in restructuring and a more manifest strive for privatisation should go hand in hand. - Implementation of the acquis : Romania has made good progress in adopting the acquis and more recently, has also made progress in gradually building up the administrative capacity to implement and effectively enforce the acquis. Over the past year, Romania has made further progress in the vast majority of the chapters of the acquis and is on track to complete the required legislative transposition before the planned date of accession if the current pace of progress is maintained. Overall, alignment with the acquis has reached a fair level in the large majority of areas. The administrative capacity has been strengthened in the majority of areas but there is still room for improvement since not all the necessary institutions are yet in place. In order to cover the remaining gaps, due attention should be given to the full and timely implementation of the strategies and action plans for the reinforcement of administrative capacity already approved in these areas: - internal market, (transposition of the public procurement legislation must be completed. In addition, practices which put Romania's commitment to open and transparent procurement procedures into question should be discontinued); - free movement of capital(outstanding restrictions to capital movements and payments should be removed and the enforcement record of the National Office for the Prevention and Control of Money Laundering needs to be improved); - agricultural, veterinary and phytosanitary acquis (particular attention should be paid to reinforcing the SAPARD Agency and to establishing the necessary elements of a functioning IACS) ; social policy and employment (efforts should now focus on completing legislative alignment in the area of labour law and on strengthening the Labour Inspectorate to ensure proper implementation in the area of health and safety at work); - industrial policy (the key challenge here is its implementation as structural weaknesses limit the capacity for enforcement. Transparency of the privatisation process should be fully ensured); - regional policy and co-ordination of structural instruments (efforts need to be continued to bring the administrative capacity up to the level required in order for Romania to reap full benefits of the structural instruments); - consumer and health protection is well on track and Romania has made good progress as regards improvement of administrative capacity and the general co-ordination of market surveillance activities. These efforts should be maintained and consumer movement should be strengthened. - justice and home affairs (implementation capacity should be significantly strengthened in almost all areas, as should inter-agency co-operation). As regards the fight against corruption, implementation capacity should also be significantly strengthened and the existing legislation should be rigorously enforced: - customs. In a number of important sectors, the overall capacity of the public administration to implement and enforce the newly adopted legislation should be enhanced. Furthermore, there are a number of areas where further efforts will be needed to complete the work, in particular as regards company law, competition policy, environment and justice and home affairs, customs and financial control. In the accession negotiations, 27 chapters have been provisionally closed. Romania is generally meeting the commitments that it has made during the negotiations, although delays have been noted in specific areas. In conclusion, the Commission expects Romania to assume the obligations of membership in accordance with the envisaged timeframe. In the period leading up to accession, Romania needs to continue its preparations, in line with the commitments it has made in the accession negotiations.
  • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2004-11-30T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report by Pierre MOSCOVICI (PES, FR) on Romania's progress towards EU membership. It wanted to see negotiations concluded rapidly (by the end of 2004), to enable the accession treaty to be signed "as early as possible in 2005" and enter into force on 1 January 2007. However, MEPs drew Romania's attention to the fact that, like Bulgaria, it could be made subject to a specific safeguard mechanism whereby the Commission could recommend that accession be put back by one year if it believed there was a "serious risk that Romania might not be able to fulfil the obligations deriving from accession". The committee acknowledged that Romania met the Copenhagen political criteria and had strengthened the stability of its institutions, thereby guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law and human rights. However it pointed to the need for "further reforms in the spheres of justice and public administration and greater efforts to combat corruption". The report congratulated Romania on the progress it had made on administrative and judicial reform and on the launch of a strategy to reform its public administration. Romania was urged to press ahead swiftly with these reforms "as a priority". On the judicial front, the committee voiced disquiet at recent official surveys showing that the executive continued to influence the outcome of judicial proceedings, and it renewed its call for the judicial system to be made more independent and professional. MEPs were also alarmed at the growing number of serious physical assaults on investigative journalists and said that further efforts were needed to guarantee the independence of the media and "the complete assertion of freedom of expression". The report noted that corruption was still a major source of concern and expressed alarm at the fact that very few corruption trials in Romania were successful. It also underlined the need for specific law enforcement measures to combat people-trafficking and for improved controls at the borders with Ukraine, Moldova and the Black Sea. Romania was praised for introducing national child protection standards and strict rules to govern inter-country adoption although MEPs warned that these must be properly enforced. They also urged the Romanian Government to expand its efforts at combating discrimination against the Roma minority, which was still "very widespread", and give priority to education. As regards bringing national laws into line with Community legislation, the report stated that Romania had achieved "a satisfactory degree of alignment in the vast majority of areas" and that, if it continued to advance at the current rate, it would have "every prospect of completing the requisite legislative transposition before the scheduled accession date". However, MEPs stressed that improvements to legislation and the adoption of action plans were not enough - mechanisms for implementing and monitoring the enforcement of legislation in all areas were also needed, so that progress could be assessed. Lastly, the committee pointed out that poverty remained an extremely serious problem in Romania, although it praised the government's efforts to set up a substantial body of social welfare legislation.
  • date: 2004-12-03T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2004-61&language=EN title: A6-0061/2004
  • date: 2004-12-15T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20041215&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2004-12-16T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3721&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2004-12-16T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2004-111 title: T6-0111/2004 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report by Pierre MOSCOVICI (PES, FR) stating that Romania fulfils the political and economic criteria for accession, but that it still has to make important efforts to fulfil its obligations on time. (Please see the summary of 30/11/2004.) Parliament discussed, in particular, the areas of justice and home affairs as regards combating corruption and organised crime and as regards border checks; the area of competition as regards state aid, and also in the field of the environment as regards the implementation of legislation in all sectors and the alignment of horizontal legislation. On the political situation and criteria, Parliament expressed concern about the following matters: - the Commission's finding referring to official surveys which confirm that the executive continues to influence the outcome of judicial proceedings, and renewed its call for the judicial system to be made more independent and professional; - the registration of alternative political organizations representing national minorities has encountered considerable administrative obstacles, preventing them from participating in elections; - corruption remained a matter of serious concern; - the fact that people with mental disabilities are subjected to arbitrary detention in mental hospitals and at the inadequacy of conditions and lack of appropriate care in many mental hospitals and other residential institutions for people with mental disabilities; - the Commission's view that violence and de facto discrimination against the Roma minority, even in official institutions, are still very widespread. On economic criteria, Parliament called on Romania to: - make the improvements required to bolster macroeconomic stability and consolidate the structural reforms; it pointed out that, in order to continue reducing the public sector deficit, it is necessary to ensure financial discipline, continuously adjusting energy prices so as to enable costs to be covered and improving the financial performance of public enterprises; On the acquis, Parliament felt that Romania has achieved a satisfactory degree of alignment in the vast majority of areas and that, if it continues to advance at the current rate and honours its undertakings, it will have every prospect of completing the requisite legislative transposition before the scheduled accession date. Romania must do much more to implement the legislation in all sectors related to the environment. It must also improve the alignment of horizontal environmental legislation, especially in the sectors of air quality, waste management, water quality and nature conservation, and in a number of other sectors.
  • date: 2004-12-16T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFET/6/23950
New
  • AFET/6/23950
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.20.01 Candidate countries
New
8.20.01
Candidate countries
activities
  • date: 2004-10-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2004/1200/COM_SEC(2004)1200_EN.pdf type: Non-legislative basic document published title: SEC(2004)1200 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: MOSCOVICI Pierre body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2004-11-30T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: MOSCOVICI Pierre body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2004-12-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2004-61&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0061/2004 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2004-12-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20041215&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2004-12-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3721&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2004-111 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0111/2004 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: MOSCOVICI Pierre
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2004-10-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP Bárbara
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
AFET/6/23950
geographical_area
Romania
reference
2004/2184(INI)
title
Romania's progress towards accession. Strategy paper and 2004 report
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
8.20.01 Candidate countries