BETA


2004/2198(INI) Fight against fraud and protection of the European Communities' financial interests

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT BÖSCH Herbert (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion PECH
Committee Opinion AGRI BATZELI Katerina (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion REGI ŽELEZNÝ Vladimír (icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM)
Committee Opinion LIBE
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion ECON
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2005/11/08
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2005/07/13
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2005/06/07
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Herbert BÖSCH (PES, AT) on protection of the Communities’ financial interests and the fight against fraud. (Please see the summary of 09/05/2005.) Parliament drew attention to the European Court of Auditors' Special Report No 3/2004 on recovery of irregular payments under the Common Agricultural Policy: according to that report, between 1971 and September 2004 irregularities involving a total of EUR 3.1 billion were reported in the sector; of that sum, EUR 626 million (20.2%) has been recovered from recipients and EUR 156 million (5%) and EUR 144 million (4.6%) has had to be paid by the EAGGF and the Member States respectively. There should still be EUR 2.2 billion (70%) to be recovered. Member States bear primary responsibility for the recovery of lost budget appropriations. Hitherto, they have failed to discharge this responsibility adequately and, in particular, have been sloppy in carrying out their reporting duties vis-à-vis the Commission.

Parliament criticised the fact that it is often those countries whose reported irregularities represent the greatest loss to the budget (2003: Spain EUR 112 367 457, Italy EUR 16 896 556, and France EUR 12 221 826) which also have the lowest recovery rates. It took the view that the non-recovery of irregular payments within four years (by means of administrative measures) or eight years (through the courts) represents a serious breach of the duty of care. The country concerned should then be required to settle the debt itself. In this way, Member States could be encouraged to take responsibility at an early stage and adopt a proactive approach to remedying errors.

Fraud involving adulterated butter : Parliament was critical of not only the fact that less than 10% of the estimated EUR 100 million loss has been recovered by the Member States concerned (Belgium, Germany and France) in the Italburro case. It criticised the fact that the true nature of the possible health risks resulting from the butter adulteration scandal has still not been established, and noted with amazement that the German authorities have issued a recovery order for only EUR 141 737 against the firms concerned, which have now challenged that order. Furthermore, five years after the case came to light the Belgian and French public prosecutor’s offices have not yet opened criminal proceedings.

Measures to combat cigarette smuggling: the agreement with Philip Morris provides for measures to prevent cigarette smuggling in the long term and seeks to settle the disputes between the Community and the undertaking. In addition, over a 12-year period PMI will pay a sum of roughly US $1 250 000 000 to the Community and the Member States. Parliament called on the Member States and the Commission to use these payments to fund measures to prevent and combat cigarette smuggling, including anti-counterfeiting activities.

Cooperation with Switzerland: Parliament welcomed the conclusion of the Agreement between the EC and the Swiss Confederation to counter fraud, and called on those Member States who had not yet ratified the Second Protocol to do so.

Delegation to private firms of missions of the European public service: In view of the prohibition inserted in the Financial Regulation in 1998, Parliament found it unacceptable that in November 1999 the Commission should nevertheless have adopted rules governing service, supply and works contracts in the context of cooperation to assist third countries which authorised the use of so-called procurement agencies, which then organised tender procedures, signed contracts and made payments to final recipients.

Priorities and prospects for OLAF's work: priority must go to investigations within the institutions and in connection with expenditure directly administered by the Commission.

OLAF investigations and the protection of fundamental freedoms: Parliament noted with concern the view expressed by the OLAF Supervisory Committee that OLAF’s current, self-imposed procedural rules governing investigations (OLAF Manual) may not be sufficient to safeguard the rights of persons under investigation by OLAF and that the admissibility as evidence of the findings of investigations may be called into question.

Finally, Parliament made some follow-up to remarks and calls from previous years, as well as on the appointment of a new Director General of OLAF.

2005/06/07
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2005/06/07
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Herbert BÖSCH (PES, AT) on protection of the Communities’ financial interests and the fight against fraud. (Please see the summary of 09/05/2005.) Parliament drew attention to the European Court of Auditors' Special Report No 3/2004 on recovery of irregular payments under the Common Agricultural Policy: according to that report, between 1971 and September 2004 irregularities involving a total of EUR 3.1 billion were reported in the sector; of that sum, EUR 626 million (20.2%) has been recovered from recipients and EUR 156 million (5%) and EUR 144 million (4.6%) has had to be paid by the EAGGF and the Member States respectively. There should still be EUR 2.2 billion (70%) to be recovered. Member States bear primary responsibility for the recovery of lost budget appropriations. Hitherto, they have failed to discharge this responsibility adequately and, in particular, have been sloppy in carrying out their reporting duties vis-à-vis the Commission.

Parliament criticised the fact that it is often those countries whose reported irregularities represent the greatest loss to the budget (2003: Spain EUR 112 367 457, Italy EUR 16 896 556, and France EUR 12 221 826) which also have the lowest recovery rates. It took the view that the non-recovery of irregular payments within four years (by means of administrative measures) or eight years (through the courts) represents a serious breach of the duty of care. The country concerned should then be required to settle the debt itself. In this way, Member States could be encouraged to take responsibility at an early stage and adopt a proactive approach to remedying errors.

Fraud involving adulterated butter : Parliament was critical of not only the fact that less than 10% of the estimated EUR 100 million loss has been recovered by the Member States concerned (Belgium, Germany and France) in the Italburro case. It criticised the fact that the true nature of the possible health risks resulting from the butter adulteration scandal has still not been established, and noted with amazement that the German authorities have issued a recovery order for only EUR 141 737 against the firms concerned, which have now challenged that order. Furthermore, five years after the case came to light the Belgian and French public prosecutor’s offices have not yet opened criminal proceedings.

Measures to combat cigarette smuggling: the agreement with Philip Morris provides for measures to prevent cigarette smuggling in the long term and seeks to settle the disputes between the Community and the undertaking. In addition, over a 12-year period PMI will pay a sum of roughly US $1 250 000 000 to the Community and the Member States. Parliament called on the Member States and the Commission to use these payments to fund measures to prevent and combat cigarette smuggling, including anti-counterfeiting activities.

Cooperation with Switzerland: Parliament welcomed the conclusion of the Agreement between the EC and the Swiss Confederation to counter fraud, and called on those Member States who had not yet ratified the Second Protocol to do so.

Delegation to private firms of missions of the European public service: In view of the prohibition inserted in the Financial Regulation in 1998, Parliament found it unacceptable that in November 1999 the Commission should nevertheless have adopted rules governing service, supply and works contracts in the context of cooperation to assist third countries which authorised the use of so-called procurement agencies, which then organised tender procedures, signed contracts and made payments to final recipients.

Priorities and prospects for OLAF's work: priority must go to investigations within the institutions and in connection with expenditure directly administered by the Commission.

OLAF investigations and the protection of fundamental freedoms: Parliament noted with concern the view expressed by the OLAF Supervisory Committee that OLAF’s current, self-imposed procedural rules governing investigations (OLAF Manual) may not be sufficient to safeguard the rights of persons under investigation by OLAF and that the admissibility as evidence of the findings of investigations may be called into question.

Finally, Parliament made some follow-up to remarks and calls from previous years, as well as on the appointment of a new Director General of OLAF.

Documents
2005/06/07
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2005/06/06
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2005/05/17
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
2005/05/09
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the annual report by Herbert BÖSCH (PES, AT) on the protection of the financial interests of the EU. One of the report's main conclusions was that the EU Member States must do more to fight fraud and speed up the recovery of EU budget funds that have been spent unlawfully.

The report noted that in 2003, irregularities and fraud totalling EUR 922m were reported by the Member States. It focused in particular on financial damage caused by cigarette smuggling, on the recovery of unlawfully spent funds and on the activities of the EU anti-fraud office OLAF.

The committee pointed out that in 2003, according to the Member States' own estimates, cigarette smuggling cost the EU at least EUR 200m in lost revenue ("own resources"). It welcomed the agreement between the Commission and Philip Morris International on combating cigarette smuggling, and called on all Member States to join the agreement, which it said should include other cigarette manufacturers as well. It also called for closer cooperation between the Member States and for Europol to be closely involved in the fight against what is just another form of organised crime. The committee praised the Commission's successful cooperation with OLAF and the decisive operational support provided by OLAF's Task Force on combating cigarette smuggling.

Regarding the recovery of unlawfully spent funds, MEPs said a total of EUR 3bn from 2003 and earlier financial years needed to be recovered. Although they welcomed the progress made by the 'Recovery' Task Force set up to deal with sums outstanding in the agricultural sector, they were clearly unhappy with the paltry recovery rate from the cases dealt with by OLAF. Of an estimated loss of EUR 5.34bn over the last five years only EUR 100m, or 1.87%, had been recovered. The committee stressed that responsibility for this situation lay mainly with the Member States: their reporting was sloppy and they had failed to attribute enough importance to the protection of the EU's financial interests.

Regarding OLAF, the committee emphasised that priority must go to investigations within the institutions and in connection with expenditure directly administered by the Commission. It urged the Commission and the Council to submit concrete proposals concerning OLAF's future role with respect to the European Public Prosecutor and Eurojust before 31 December 2005. Lastly, it welcomed the Commission's decision to fill the post of Director-General of OLAF following a public call for applications, so that a genuine and credible selection process can take place, giving the Director-General a valid mandate and sufficient credibility. It added that a decision on the new appointment should be taken as soon as possible.

2005/03/16
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2005/03/15
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2005/01/31
   EP - ŽELEZNÝ Vladimír (IND/DEM) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2005/01/20
   EP - BATZELI Katerina (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI
2004/11/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2004/10/21
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2004/10/21
   CSL - Council Meeting
2004/09/22
   EP - BÖSCH Herbert (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2004/08/30
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE : to present the 2003 Annual Report on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests and the fight against fraud.

CONTENT : the 2003 report recently issued by the Commission illustrates the continued efforts to improve the fight against fraud, in terms of structures and procedures, both within the European institutions and at national level. The report highlights the significant efforts undertaken to audit the structural funds following recommendations by the Court of Auditors, develop information sharing with the Member states and improve recovery in the area of direct expenditure such as agriculture. The Commission remains concerned that Member States do not notify irregularities on a sufficiently consistent basis and that their efforts to safeguard the Communities financial interests and claw-back funds are not always adequate, although organisational improvements are progressively bringing about an improvement of the situation. The report also reveals a decrease in the overall number of cases and amounts of irregularity reported in the fields of own resources, CAP and structural funds. Likewise, the Commission is continuing its own efforts through the final stage of implementation of its 2000-2005 strategy, through further improvements in OLAF's regulatory and organisational environment; enhanced information flows with Member States; and the preparations for the future establishment of an European Public Prosecutor.

More specifically, the Commission established its political and general objectives in its overall strategic Approach adopted on 28 June 2000 for the 2001-2005 period. The implementation of this overall strategy by the Commission, including by the European Anti-Fraud Office in its non operational functions, is given concrete expression in the 2001-2003 Action Plan. Major developments achieved in 2003 by the Commission, are highlighted in this annual report. They are in line with the four main themes of the Overall Strategic Approach. The report refers to certain horizontal topics such as the results of the audits in the Structural Funds. It also refers to the Commission Report evaluating the activities of OLAF and the commitments made before the European Parliament on 18 November

2003. A summary is made of progress in the criminal law protection of the financial interests of the Communities, in particular with regard to the European prosecutor project and relations between the Commission and the judicial and police cooperation bodies.

The first part of the report highlights some significant Community activities in 2003, without mentioning all of the tasks achieved to implement the 2001-2003 Action Plan and to follow up the Resolutions of the European Parliament and the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2002. The second part of the report presents a summary of the measures taken in 2003 by the Member States to implement the EC treaty. Two aspects were favoured in 2003: the structural measures and recovery in the field of direct expenditure.

The report is accompanied by two staff working documents: on the one hand, the implementation of the 2001-2003 Action Plan and an inventory of the measures taken by the Member States, on the other hand the relevant statistical information.

- As regards the overall Evaluation of the Measures adopted by the Community in the area of structural funds: the internal follow up of irregularities and the procedures for recovery were judged satisfactory in the majority of the Member States - which leads to believe that the latter organise themselves better regarding their responsibilities related to sound management of the Structural Funds, as well as dealing with irregularities and recovery, and that they generally assume their tasks in an appropriate way.

It is necessary, then, for Member States to improve their interpretation of the concept of irregularity so as to have a more complete and reliable image of the protection of financial interests and the fight against fraud on the basis of complete, coherent, precise and up to date data. The Commission sent to the various Member States specific recommendations to be implemented.

- With regard to Community policies carried out by way of decentralized management (EAGGF-Guarantee, structural funds), it is up to the Member States to carry out the recovery of the funds unduly paid to the final recipients and to repay the amounts to the Community budget. For its part, the Commission is required to follow the recovery procedures carried out by the Member States and to apply, if necessary, the clearance procedures. The slowness of these procedures and the accumulation of Community debts is a subject of concern both for the Commission, the Court of Auditors and the Budgetary authority. In its communication of 3 December 2002 which aims in particular to strengthen recovery, the Commission decided to set up a Recovery Task Force in the area of EAGGF Guarantee Funds, made up of agents of OLAF and the DG Agriculture. The total arrears of irregularities due to be recovered were estimated in 2002 at EUR 2.2 billion, according to the data communicated by the Member States under the terms of Articles 3 and 5 of Regulation 595/91.

With regard to cases of irregularity communicated before 1999, the subject of the work of the Task Force, the amount is more than EUR 1 billion. With regard to the cases from the years 1995 to 1999 and the cases prior to 1995 relating to Italy, the Task Force examined in detail 433 cases (of which 343 concern Italy), each of which involved an amount higher than EUR 500.000. Once this analysis was completed, the total to be recovered was fixed at EUR 700 million for nine Member States (including 550 million for Italy). It should be noted that the Commission set up a consultation process involving the European Anti Fraud Office as far upstream as possible, so as to benefit from its operational experience from the stage of the drawing-up of the legislative proposals. This mechanism entered its active phase in 2003 and was, however, for this first full year of operation, of a primarily experimental nature.

- A strategy of cooperation and mutual assistance between all the public partners is particularly necessary to fight efficiently against organised criminality, in particular transnational criminality, affecting the Community's financial interests. The Commission assumes its responsibilities, in particular by giving its assistance in the field of intelligence and in the operational field.

- Since May 1999, the Community has had an overall legal framework to fight against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activity affecting its financial interests and to investigate irregular behaviour inside the institutions, bodies and offices. Reflections on the reinforcement of this mechanism, which frames OLAF's activities, advanced in 2003, including on the basis of the Commission's progress report (article 15) and experience in the Eurostat case.

- The requirement to prosecute in a more effective way the authors of criminality undermining the Communities' financial interests, a fortiori under an enlarged Europe, led the Commission to propose the creation of a European Prosecutor. The year 2003 will have been marked by the follow up of this debate and its concrete expression in the proposals of the European Convention on the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor, on which the decision is to be made by the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC). Lastly, as a result of the extension of the mandate of Europol on 01/01/2002 to all the serious forms of international criminality, among which fraud and corruption, and of the creation of Eurojust, there have been significant developments in the cooperation between the Commission and the judicial and police bodies, in 2003.

2004/08/29
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE : to present the 2003 Annual Report on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests and the fight against fraud.

CONTENT : the 2003 report recently issued by the Commission illustrates the continued efforts to improve the fight against fraud, in terms of structures and procedures, both within the European institutions and at national level. The report highlights the significant efforts undertaken to audit the structural funds following recommendations by the Court of Auditors, develop information sharing with the Member states and improve recovery in the area of direct expenditure such as agriculture. The Commission remains concerned that Member States do not notify irregularities on a sufficiently consistent basis and that their efforts to safeguard the Communities financial interests and claw-back funds are not always adequate, although organisational improvements are progressively bringing about an improvement of the situation. The report also reveals a decrease in the overall number of cases and amounts of irregularity reported in the fields of own resources, CAP and structural funds. Likewise, the Commission is continuing its own efforts through the final stage of implementation of its 2000-2005 strategy, through further improvements in OLAF's regulatory and organisational environment; enhanced information flows with Member States; and the preparations for the future establishment of an European Public Prosecutor.

More specifically, the Commission established its political and general objectives in its overall strategic Approach adopted on 28 June 2000 for the 2001-2005 period. The implementation of this overall strategy by the Commission, including by the European Anti-Fraud Office in its non operational functions, is given concrete expression in the 2001-2003 Action Plan. Major developments achieved in 2003 by the Commission, are highlighted in this annual report. They are in line with the four main themes of the Overall Strategic Approach. The report refers to certain horizontal topics such as the results of the audits in the Structural Funds. It also refers to the Commission Report evaluating the activities of OLAF and the commitments made before the European Parliament on 18 November

2003. A summary is made of progress in the criminal law protection of the financial interests of the Communities, in particular with regard to the European prosecutor project and relations between the Commission and the judicial and police cooperation bodies.

The first part of the report highlights some significant Community activities in 2003, without mentioning all of the tasks achieved to implement the 2001-2003 Action Plan and to follow up the Resolutions of the European Parliament and the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2002. The second part of the report presents a summary of the measures taken in 2003 by the Member States to implement the EC treaty. Two aspects were favoured in 2003: the structural measures and recovery in the field of direct expenditure.

The report is accompanied by two staff working documents: on the one hand, the implementation of the 2001-2003 Action Plan and an inventory of the measures taken by the Member States, on the other hand the relevant statistical information.

- As regards the overall Evaluation of the Measures adopted by the Community in the area of structural funds: the internal follow up of irregularities and the procedures for recovery were judged satisfactory in the majority of the Member States - which leads to believe that the latter organise themselves better regarding their responsibilities related to sound management of the Structural Funds, as well as dealing with irregularities and recovery, and that they generally assume their tasks in an appropriate way.

It is necessary, then, for Member States to improve their interpretation of the concept of irregularity so as to have a more complete and reliable image of the protection of financial interests and the fight against fraud on the basis of complete, coherent, precise and up to date data. The Commission sent to the various Member States specific recommendations to be implemented.

- With regard to Community policies carried out by way of decentralized management (EAGGF-Guarantee, structural funds), it is up to the Member States to carry out the recovery of the funds unduly paid to the final recipients and to repay the amounts to the Community budget. For its part, the Commission is required to follow the recovery procedures carried out by the Member States and to apply, if necessary, the clearance procedures. The slowness of these procedures and the accumulation of Community debts is a subject of concern both for the Commission, the Court of Auditors and the Budgetary authority. In its communication of 3 December 2002 which aims in particular to strengthen recovery, the Commission decided to set up a Recovery Task Force in the area of EAGGF Guarantee Funds, made up of agents of OLAF and the DG Agriculture. The total arrears of irregularities due to be recovered were estimated in 2002 at EUR 2.2 billion, according to the data communicated by the Member States under the terms of Articles 3 and 5 of Regulation 595/91.

With regard to cases of irregularity communicated before 1999, the subject of the work of the Task Force, the amount is more than EUR 1 billion. With regard to the cases from the years 1995 to 1999 and the cases prior to 1995 relating to Italy, the Task Force examined in detail 433 cases (of which 343 concern Italy), each of which involved an amount higher than EUR 500.000. Once this analysis was completed, the total to be recovered was fixed at EUR 700 million for nine Member States (including 550 million for Italy). It should be noted that the Commission set up a consultation process involving the European Anti Fraud Office as far upstream as possible, so as to benefit from its operational experience from the stage of the drawing-up of the legislative proposals. This mechanism entered its active phase in 2003 and was, however, for this first full year of operation, of a primarily experimental nature.

- A strategy of cooperation and mutual assistance between all the public partners is particularly necessary to fight efficiently against organised criminality, in particular transnational criminality, affecting the Community's financial interests. The Commission assumes its responsibilities, in particular by giving its assistance in the field of intelligence and in the operational field.

- Since May 1999, the Community has had an overall legal framework to fight against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activity affecting its financial interests and to investigate irregular behaviour inside the institutions, bodies and offices. Reflections on the reinforcement of this mechanism, which frames OLAF's activities, advanced in 2003, including on the basis of the Commission's progress report (article 15) and experience in the Eurostat case.

- The requirement to prosecute in a more effective way the authors of criminality undermining the Communities' financial interests, a fortiori under an enlarged Europe, led the Commission to propose the creation of a European Prosecutor. The year 2003 will have been marked by the follow up of this debate and its concrete expression in the proposals of the European Convention on the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor, on which the decision is to be made by the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC). Lastly, as a result of the extension of the mandate of Europol on 01/01/2002 to all the serious forms of international criminality, among which fraud and corruption, and of the creation of Eurojust, there have been significant developments in the cooperation between the Commission and the judicial and police bodies, in 2003.

2004/08/09
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Details

PURPOSE : to present a report from the Commission concerning protecting the Communities' financial interests - Fight against fraud - Action Plan for 2004-2005.

CONTENT : following along the same lines as its 2001-2003 Action Plan, the Commission's 2004-2005 Action Plan on the protection of financial interests and the fight against fraud calls for the continued implementation of the overall strategic approach adopted by the Commission on 28 June 2000, which defined the broad guidelines for the Community and the Member States for the five years ahead (2001 to 2005).

The new 2004-2005 action plan corresponds to the second stage of the programme, in the framework of the 2000 overall strategic approach, and follows the four main action guidelines described above. It also takes into account the new guidelines set out in the Progress report on the activities of OLAF and the measures announced in the Commission President's speech in November 2003. Specifically, the 2004-2005 Action Plan testifies to the Commission's ongoing commitment to the fight against fraud and contains one of its responses to the new challenges relating to the development of the Union in 2004 and 2005.

The Plan comprises:

- actions that it was not possible to implement in the previous period and actions that still have to be decided on in order to complete implementation of the overall strategic approach, in particular the strengthening of the operational partnership with the Member States;

- recent developments relating to the reinforcement of the legal framework of OLAF, as recommended by the Commission in its progress report on the activities of OLAF and by the President of the Commission in his Action Plan of 18 November 2003. Because of the weaknesses revealed by the Eurostat case, the Commission thinks it necessary to act more rapidly and thoroughly than originally envisaged in the progress report. Consequently, a number of initiatives, some of which are already being implemented, will be taken in addition to the recommendations of the Progress report;

- a number of more specific initiatives, such as the White Book on the European Prosecutor, or other initiatives, which respond to specific requests or needs, such as the handling of irregularities notified before 1 January 1999 in relation to the EAGGF-guarantee section ("Recovery" Task-Force) or the simplification of the procedures for notifying irregularities (EAGGF-Guarantee, Structural Funds, Cohesion Fund).

This new Action Plan emphasises the following policy guidelines and priorities:

- reinforcing the regulatory framework of May 1999 for OLAF's activities and competencies (improving the information flow between OLAF and the European institutions and bodies;

- fully guaranteeing the rights of individuals affected by an external or internal inquiry;

- strengthening OLAF's operational efficiency and enhancing the role of the Office's Supervisory Committee);

- improving the information flow between the Member States and the Commission, for example by amending the regulations on notification of irregularities; developing the Customs Investigations Information File ("FIDE") and implementing the new Regulation concerning mutual administrative assistance in the field of VAT and the laundering of profits from Community fraud;

- developing the criminal-law protection of the Community's financial interests with the competent authorities in the Member States, for example by following up the decision of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) to establish, in the constitutional treaty, the legal basis for creating a European Prosecutor with competence for protecting the financial interests of the European Union.

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/1
date
2004-08-30T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/1
date
2005-03-09T00:00:00
docs
title: PE355.457
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-353525_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-353646_EN.html
docs/4
date
2005-04-04T00:00:00
docs
title: PE355.781
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/0/date
Old
2004-08-30T00:00:00
New
2004-08-29T00:00:00
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0544/COM_COM(2004)0544_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0544/COM_COM(2004)0544_EN.pdf
docs/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE353.525
docs/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE353.646
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0218_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0218_EN.html
events/2/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4/type
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
New
Committee report tabled for plenary
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050606&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20050606&type=CRE
events/7
date
2005-06-07T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0218_EN.html title: T6-0218/2005
summary
events/7
date
2005-06-07T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0218_EN.html title: T6-0218/2005
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: BÖSCH Herbert date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2004-09-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BÖSCH Herbert group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
rapporteur
name: ŽELEZNÝ Vladimír date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 group: Independence and democracy abbr: IND/DEM
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2005-01-31T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ŽELEZNÝ Vladimír group: Independence and democracy abbr: IND/DEM
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
rapporteur
name: BATZELI Katerina date: 2005-01-20T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2005-01-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BATZELI Katerina group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-218
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0218_EN.html
docs/6/body
EC
docs/7/body
EC
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-218
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0218_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2004-08-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0573/COM_COM(2004)0573(COR1)_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0573 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52004DC0573:EN body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2612 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2612*&MEET_DATE=21/10/2004 type: Debate in Council title: 2612 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2004-10-21T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2005-01-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: BATZELI Katerina body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PSE name: BÖSCH Herbert body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: ŽELEZNÝ Vladimír
  • date: 2005-05-09T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2005-01-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: BATZELI Katerina body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PSE name: BÖSCH Herbert body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: ŽELEZNÝ Vladimír type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2005-05-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2005-06-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050606&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-06-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4029&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-218 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0218/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2004-09-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BÖSCH Herbert group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AGRI
date
2005-01-20T00:00:00
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
rapporteur
group: PSE name: BATZELI Katerina
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2004-09-22T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: PSE name: BÖSCH Herbert
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2005-01-31T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ŽELEZNÝ Vladimír group: Independence and democracy abbr: IND/DEM
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2005-01-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BATZELI Katerina group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
opinion
False
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
opinion
False
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
REGI
date
2005-01-31T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development
rapporteur
group: IND/DEM name: ŽELEZNÝ Vladimír
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2612 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2612*&MEET_DATE=21/10/2004 date: 2004-10-21T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2004-08-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0544/COM_COM(2004)0544_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0544 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=544 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE : to present a report from the Commission concerning protecting the Communities' financial interests - Fight against fraud - Action Plan for 2004-2005. CONTENT : following along the same lines as its 2001-2003 Action Plan, the Commission's 2004-2005 Action Plan on the protection of financial interests and the fight against fraud calls for the continued implementation of the overall strategic approach adopted by the Commission on 28 June 2000, which defined the broad guidelines for the Community and the Member States for the five years ahead (2001 to 2005). The new 2004-2005 action plan corresponds to the second stage of the programme, in the framework of the 2000 overall strategic approach, and follows the four main action guidelines described above. It also takes into account the new guidelines set out in the Progress report on the activities of OLAF and the measures announced in the Commission President's speech in November 2003. Specifically, the 2004-2005 Action Plan testifies to the Commission's ongoing commitment to the fight against fraud and contains one of its responses to the new challenges relating to the development of the Union in 2004 and 2005. The Plan comprises: - actions that it was not possible to implement in the previous period and actions that still have to be decided on in order to complete implementation of the overall strategic approach, in particular the strengthening of the operational partnership with the Member States; - recent developments relating to the reinforcement of the legal framework of OLAF, as recommended by the Commission in its progress report on the activities of OLAF and by the President of the Commission in his Action Plan of 18 November 2003. Because of the weaknesses revealed by the Eurostat case, the Commission thinks it necessary to act more rapidly and thoroughly than originally envisaged in the progress report. Consequently, a number of initiatives, some of which are already being implemented, will be taken in addition to the recommendations of the Progress report; - a number of more specific initiatives, such as the White Book on the European Prosecutor, or other initiatives, which respond to specific requests or needs, such as the handling of irregularities notified before 1 January 1999 in relation to the EAGGF-guarantee section ("Recovery" Task-Force) or the simplification of the procedures for notifying irregularities (EAGGF-Guarantee, Structural Funds, Cohesion Fund). This new Action Plan emphasises the following policy guidelines and priorities: - reinforcing the regulatory framework of May 1999 for OLAF's activities and competencies (improving the information flow between OLAF and the European institutions and bodies; - fully guaranteeing the rights of individuals affected by an external or internal inquiry; - strengthening OLAF's operational efficiency and enhancing the role of the Office's Supervisory Committee); - improving the information flow between the Member States and the Commission, for example by amending the regulations on notification of irregularities; developing the Customs Investigations Information File ("FIDE") and implementing the new Regulation concerning mutual administrative assistance in the field of VAT and the laundering of profits from Community fraud; - developing the criminal-law protection of the Community's financial interests with the competent authorities in the Member States, for example by following up the decision of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) to establish, in the constitutional treaty, the legal basis for creating a European Prosecutor with competence for protecting the financial interests of the European Union. type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2005-03-09T00:00:00 docs: title: PE355.457 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2005-03-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE353.525 title: PE353.525 committee: REGI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2005-03-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE353.646 title: PE353.646 committee: AGRI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2005-04-04T00:00:00 docs: title: PE355.781 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2005-06-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-218 title: T6-0218/2005 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2006:124E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 124 25.05.2006, p. 0021-0232 E summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Herbert BÖSCH (PES, AT) on protection of the Communities’ financial interests and the fight against fraud. (Please see the summary of 09/05/2005.) Parliament drew attention to the European Court of Auditors' Special Report No 3/2004 on recovery of irregular payments under the Common Agricultural Policy: according to that report, between 1971 and September 2004 irregularities involving a total of EUR 3.1 billion were reported in the sector; of that sum, EUR 626 million (20.2%) has been recovered from recipients and EUR 156 million (5%) and EUR 144 million (4.6%) has had to be paid by the EAGGF and the Member States respectively. There should still be EUR 2.2 billion (70%) to be recovered. Member States bear primary responsibility for the recovery of lost budget appropriations. Hitherto, they have failed to discharge this responsibility adequately and, in particular, have been sloppy in carrying out their reporting duties vis-à-vis the Commission. Parliament criticised the fact that it is often those countries whose reported irregularities represent the greatest loss to the budget (2003: Spain EUR 112 367 457, Italy EUR 16 896 556, and France EUR 12 221 826) which also have the lowest recovery rates. It took the view that the non-recovery of irregular payments within four years (by means of administrative measures) or eight years (through the courts) represents a serious breach of the duty of care. The country concerned should then be required to settle the debt itself. In this way, Member States could be encouraged to take responsibility at an early stage and adopt a proactive approach to remedying errors. Fraud involving adulterated butter : Parliament was critical of not only the fact that less than 10% of the estimated EUR 100 million loss has been recovered by the Member States concerned (Belgium, Germany and France) in the Italburro case. It criticised the fact that the true nature of the possible health risks resulting from the butter adulteration scandal has still not been established, and noted with amazement that the German authorities have issued a recovery order for only EUR 141 737 against the firms concerned, which have now challenged that order. Furthermore, five years after the case came to light the Belgian and French public prosecutor’s offices have not yet opened criminal proceedings. Measures to combat cigarette smuggling: the agreement with Philip Morris provides for measures to prevent cigarette smuggling in the long term and seeks to settle the disputes between the Community and the undertaking. In addition, over a 12-year period PMI will pay a sum of roughly US $1 250 000 000 to the Community and the Member States. Parliament called on the Member States and the Commission to use these payments to fund measures to prevent and combat cigarette smuggling, including anti-counterfeiting activities. Cooperation with Switzerland: Parliament welcomed the conclusion of the Agreement between the EC and the Swiss Confederation to counter fraud, and called on those Member States who had not yet ratified the Second Protocol to do so. Delegation to private firms of missions of the European public service: In view of the prohibition inserted in the Financial Regulation in 1998, Parliament found it unacceptable that in November 1999 the Commission should nevertheless have adopted rules governing service, supply and works contracts in the context of cooperation to assist third countries which authorised the use of so-called procurement agencies, which then organised tender procedures, signed contracts and made payments to final recipients. Priorities and prospects for OLAF's work: priority must go to investigations within the institutions and in connection with expenditure directly administered by the Commission. OLAF investigations and the protection of fundamental freedoms: Parliament noted with concern the view expressed by the OLAF Supervisory Committee that OLAF’s current, self-imposed procedural rules governing investigations (OLAF Manual) may not be sufficient to safeguard the rights of persons under investigation by OLAF and that the admissibility as evidence of the findings of investigations may be called into question. Finally, Parliament made some follow-up to remarks and calls from previous years, as well as on the appointment of a new Director General of OLAF. type: Text adopted by Parliament, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-07-13T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4029&j=0&l=en title: SP(2005)2882 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2005-11-08T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4029&j=1&l=en title: SP(2005)3923 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2004-08-30T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0573/COM_COM(2004)0573(COR1)_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0573 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=573 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE : to present the 2003 Annual Report on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests and the fight against fraud. CONTENT : the 2003 report recently issued by the Commission illustrates the continued efforts to improve the fight against fraud, in terms of structures and procedures, both within the European institutions and at national level. The report highlights the significant efforts undertaken to audit the structural funds following recommendations by the Court of Auditors, develop information sharing with the Member states and improve recovery in the area of direct expenditure such as agriculture. The Commission remains concerned that Member States do not notify irregularities on a sufficiently consistent basis and that their efforts to safeguard the Communities financial interests and claw-back funds are not always adequate, although organisational improvements are progressively bringing about an improvement of the situation. The report also reveals a decrease in the overall number of cases and amounts of irregularity reported in the fields of own resources, CAP and structural funds. Likewise, the Commission is continuing its own efforts through the final stage of implementation of its 2000-2005 strategy, through further improvements in OLAF's regulatory and organisational environment; enhanced information flows with Member States; and the preparations for the future establishment of an European Public Prosecutor. More specifically, the Commission established its political and general objectives in its overall strategic Approach adopted on 28 June 2000 for the 2001-2005 period. The implementation of this overall strategy by the Commission, including by the European Anti-Fraud Office in its non operational functions, is given concrete expression in the 2001-2003 Action Plan. Major developments achieved in 2003 by the Commission, are highlighted in this annual report. They are in line with the four main themes of the Overall Strategic Approach. The report refers to certain horizontal topics such as the results of the audits in the Structural Funds. It also refers to the Commission Report evaluating the activities of OLAF and the commitments made before the European Parliament on 18 November 2003. A summary is made of progress in the criminal law protection of the financial interests of the Communities, in particular with regard to the European prosecutor project and relations between the Commission and the judicial and police cooperation bodies. The first part of the report highlights some significant Community activities in 2003, without mentioning all of the tasks achieved to implement the 2001-2003 Action Plan and to follow up the Resolutions of the European Parliament and the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2002. The second part of the report presents a summary of the measures taken in 2003 by the Member States to implement the EC treaty. Two aspects were favoured in 2003: the structural measures and recovery in the field of direct expenditure. The report is accompanied by two staff working documents: on the one hand, the implementation of the 2001-2003 Action Plan and an inventory of the measures taken by the Member States, on the other hand the relevant statistical information. - As regards the overall Evaluation of the Measures adopted by the Community in the area of structural funds: the internal follow up of irregularities and the procedures for recovery were judged satisfactory in the majority of the Member States - which leads to believe that the latter organise themselves better regarding their responsibilities related to sound management of the Structural Funds, as well as dealing with irregularities and recovery, and that they generally assume their tasks in an appropriate way. It is necessary, then, for Member States to improve their interpretation of the concept of irregularity so as to have a more complete and reliable image of the protection of financial interests and the fight against fraud on the basis of complete, coherent, precise and up to date data. The Commission sent to the various Member States specific recommendations to be implemented. - With regard to Community policies carried out by way of decentralized management (EAGGF-Guarantee, structural funds), it is up to the Member States to carry out the recovery of the funds unduly paid to the final recipients and to repay the amounts to the Community budget. For its part, the Commission is required to follow the recovery procedures carried out by the Member States and to apply, if necessary, the clearance procedures. The slowness of these procedures and the accumulation of Community debts is a subject of concern both for the Commission, the Court of Auditors and the Budgetary authority. In its communication of 3 December 2002 which aims in particular to strengthen recovery, the Commission decided to set up a Recovery Task Force in the area of EAGGF Guarantee Funds, made up of agents of OLAF and the DG Agriculture. The total arrears of irregularities due to be recovered were estimated in 2002 at EUR 2.2 billion, according to the data communicated by the Member States under the terms of Articles 3 and 5 of Regulation 595/91. With regard to cases of irregularity communicated before 1999, the subject of the work of the Task Force, the amount is more than EUR 1 billion. With regard to the cases from the years 1995 to 1999 and the cases prior to 1995 relating to Italy, the Task Force examined in detail 433 cases (of which 343 concern Italy), each of which involved an amount higher than EUR 500.000. Once this analysis was completed, the total to be recovered was fixed at EUR 700 million for nine Member States (including 550 million for Italy). It should be noted that the Commission set up a consultation process involving the European Anti Fraud Office as far upstream as possible, so as to benefit from its operational experience from the stage of the drawing-up of the legislative proposals. This mechanism entered its active phase in 2003 and was, however, for this first full year of operation, of a primarily experimental nature. - A strategy of cooperation and mutual assistance between all the public partners is particularly necessary to fight efficiently against organised criminality, in particular transnational criminality, affecting the Community's financial interests. The Commission assumes its responsibilities, in particular by giving its assistance in the field of intelligence and in the operational field. - Since May 1999, the Community has had an overall legal framework to fight against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activity affecting its financial interests and to investigate irregular behaviour inside the institutions, bodies and offices. Reflections on the reinforcement of this mechanism, which frames OLAF's activities, advanced in 2003, including on the basis of the Commission's progress report (article 15) and experience in the Eurostat case. - The requirement to prosecute in a more effective way the authors of criminality undermining the Communities' financial interests, a fortiori under an enlarged Europe, led the Commission to propose the creation of a European Prosecutor. The year 2003 will have been marked by the follow up of this debate and its concrete expression in the proposals of the European Convention on the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor, on which the decision is to be made by the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC). Lastly, as a result of the extension of the mandate of Europol on 01/01/2002 to all the serious forms of international criminality, among which fraud and corruption, and of the creation of Eurojust, there have been significant developments in the cooperation between the Commission and the judicial and police bodies, in 2003.
  • date: 2004-10-21T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2612*&MEET_DATE=21/10/2004 title: 2612
  • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-05-09T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the annual report by Herbert BÖSCH (PES, AT) on the protection of the financial interests of the EU. One of the report's main conclusions was that the EU Member States must do more to fight fraud and speed up the recovery of EU budget funds that have been spent unlawfully. The report noted that in 2003, irregularities and fraud totalling EUR 922m were reported by the Member States. It focused in particular on financial damage caused by cigarette smuggling, on the recovery of unlawfully spent funds and on the activities of the EU anti-fraud office OLAF. The committee pointed out that in 2003, according to the Member States' own estimates, cigarette smuggling cost the EU at least EUR 200m in lost revenue ("own resources"). It welcomed the agreement between the Commission and Philip Morris International on combating cigarette smuggling, and called on all Member States to join the agreement, which it said should include other cigarette manufacturers as well. It also called for closer cooperation between the Member States and for Europol to be closely involved in the fight against what is just another form of organised crime. The committee praised the Commission's successful cooperation with OLAF and the decisive operational support provided by OLAF's Task Force on combating cigarette smuggling. Regarding the recovery of unlawfully spent funds, MEPs said a total of EUR 3bn from 2003 and earlier financial years needed to be recovered. Although they welcomed the progress made by the 'Recovery' Task Force set up to deal with sums outstanding in the agricultural sector, they were clearly unhappy with the paltry recovery rate from the cases dealt with by OLAF. Of an estimated loss of EUR 5.34bn over the last five years only EUR 100m, or 1.87%, had been recovered. The committee stressed that responsibility for this situation lay mainly with the Member States: their reporting was sloppy and they had failed to attribute enough importance to the protection of the EU's financial interests. Regarding OLAF, the committee emphasised that priority must go to investigations within the institutions and in connection with expenditure directly administered by the Commission. It urged the Commission and the Council to submit concrete proposals concerning OLAF's future role with respect to the European Public Prosecutor and Eurojust before 31 December 2005. Lastly, it welcomed the Commission's decision to fill the post of Director-General of OLAF following a public call for applications, so that a genuine and credible selection process can take place, giving the Director-General a valid mandate and sufficient credibility. It added that a decision on the new appointment should be taken as soon as possible.
  • date: 2005-05-17T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-06-06T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050606&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-06-07T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4029&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2005-06-07T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-218 title: T6-0218/2005 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Herbert BÖSCH (PES, AT) on protection of the Communities’ financial interests and the fight against fraud. (Please see the summary of 09/05/2005.) Parliament drew attention to the European Court of Auditors' Special Report No 3/2004 on recovery of irregular payments under the Common Agricultural Policy: according to that report, between 1971 and September 2004 irregularities involving a total of EUR 3.1 billion were reported in the sector; of that sum, EUR 626 million (20.2%) has been recovered from recipients and EUR 156 million (5%) and EUR 144 million (4.6%) has had to be paid by the EAGGF and the Member States respectively. There should still be EUR 2.2 billion (70%) to be recovered. Member States bear primary responsibility for the recovery of lost budget appropriations. Hitherto, they have failed to discharge this responsibility adequately and, in particular, have been sloppy in carrying out their reporting duties vis-à-vis the Commission. Parliament criticised the fact that it is often those countries whose reported irregularities represent the greatest loss to the budget (2003: Spain EUR 112 367 457, Italy EUR 16 896 556, and France EUR 12 221 826) which also have the lowest recovery rates. It took the view that the non-recovery of irregular payments within four years (by means of administrative measures) or eight years (through the courts) represents a serious breach of the duty of care. The country concerned should then be required to settle the debt itself. In this way, Member States could be encouraged to take responsibility at an early stage and adopt a proactive approach to remedying errors. Fraud involving adulterated butter : Parliament was critical of not only the fact that less than 10% of the estimated EUR 100 million loss has been recovered by the Member States concerned (Belgium, Germany and France) in the Italburro case. It criticised the fact that the true nature of the possible health risks resulting from the butter adulteration scandal has still not been established, and noted with amazement that the German authorities have issued a recovery order for only EUR 141 737 against the firms concerned, which have now challenged that order. Furthermore, five years after the case came to light the Belgian and French public prosecutor’s offices have not yet opened criminal proceedings. Measures to combat cigarette smuggling: the agreement with Philip Morris provides for measures to prevent cigarette smuggling in the long term and seeks to settle the disputes between the Community and the undertaking. In addition, over a 12-year period PMI will pay a sum of roughly US $1 250 000 000 to the Community and the Member States. Parliament called on the Member States and the Commission to use these payments to fund measures to prevent and combat cigarette smuggling, including anti-counterfeiting activities. Cooperation with Switzerland: Parliament welcomed the conclusion of the Agreement between the EC and the Swiss Confederation to counter fraud, and called on those Member States who had not yet ratified the Second Protocol to do so. Delegation to private firms of missions of the European public service: In view of the prohibition inserted in the Financial Regulation in 1998, Parliament found it unacceptable that in November 1999 the Commission should nevertheless have adopted rules governing service, supply and works contracts in the context of cooperation to assist third countries which authorised the use of so-called procurement agencies, which then organised tender procedures, signed contracts and made payments to final recipients. Priorities and prospects for OLAF's work: priority must go to investigations within the institutions and in connection with expenditure directly administered by the Commission. OLAF investigations and the protection of fundamental freedoms: Parliament noted with concern the view expressed by the OLAF Supervisory Committee that OLAF’s current, self-imposed procedural rules governing investigations (OLAF Manual) may not be sufficient to safeguard the rights of persons under investigation by OLAF and that the admissibility as evidence of the findings of investigations may be called into question. Finally, Parliament made some follow-up to remarks and calls from previous years, as well as on the appointment of a new Director General of OLAF.
  • date: 2005-06-07T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    CONT/6/24381
    New
    • CONT/6/24381
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 52
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 8.70.04 Protecting financial interests of the EU against fraud
    New
    8.70.04
    Protecting financial interests of the EU against fraud
    activities/0/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=573
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0573/COM_COM(2004)0573(COR1)_EN.pdf
    activities
    • date: 2004-08-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=573 celexid: CELEX:52004DC0573:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2004)0573 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission:
    • body: CSL meeting_id: 2612 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2612*&MEET_DATE=21/10/2004 type: Debate in Council title: 2612 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2004-10-21T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
    • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2005-01-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: BATZELI Katerina body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PSE name: BÖSCH Herbert body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: ŽELEZNÝ Vladimír
    • date: 2005-05-09T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2005-01-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: BATZELI Katerina body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PSE name: BÖSCH Herbert body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: ŽELEZNÝ Vladimír type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 2005-05-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • date: 2005-06-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050606&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2005-06-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4029&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-218 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0218/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2005-01-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: BATZELI Katerina
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PSE name: BÖSCH Herbert
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: ŽELEZNÝ Vladimír
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      CONT/6/24381
      reference
      2004/2198(INI)
      title
      Fight against fraud and protection of the European Communities' financial interests
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      8.70.04 Protecting financial interests of the EU against fraud