BETA


2004/2216(INI) Strategies to prevent the trafficking of women and children vulnerable to sexual exploitation

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead FEMM PRETS Christa (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion LIBE SEGELSTRÖM Inger (icon: PSE PSE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2006/05/10
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/02/09
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/01/17
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2006/01/17
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Christa PRETS (PES, AT) on strategies to prevent the trafficking of women and children who are vulnerable to sexual exploitation. (Please see the summary of 24/11/2005.) The report was adopted by 622 votes in favour, 12 against and 19 abstentions.

Parliament began by recalling that e very year, over 100 000 women are the victims of trafficking in the EU. Trafficking is the fastest-growing criminal activity in comparison to other forms of organised crime. One of the principal preconditions for international trafficking in women and children is the existence of local prostitution markets where certain people can sell and buy women and children for the purpose of exploiting them sexually. Traffickers in human beings mainly send women and children from countries in the south to countries in the north and from east to west, where demand from purchasers is strongest.

Parliament felt that it is necessary to address the prevention of trafficking not only through individual actions by each Member State but by a holistic and integrated multidisciplinary approach at the EU and international levels which would include the laying down of aspects of criminal law which are common to all the Member States and which relate in particular to effective, and dissuasive penalties. Building effective prevention strategies requires, inter alia: addressing the triangle of the trafficking market, i.e. victim, trafficker and client; systematic provision of information and raising awareness amongst all categories of the population and in particular amongst vulnerable groups; and cooperation among the countries of origin, transit and destination.

Parliament deplored the fact that the measures which have so far been taken to reduce trafficking in human beings have not yielded results in the form of a reduction in the numbers of women and children being exploited in the sex slave trade. It also regretted that there is a lack of recognition of the links between trafficking and migration, social protection and development policy, and calls for more coherent external policy on trafficking. The Commission and Council are asked to create a clear legal basis for combating all forms of violence against women, including trafficking. Parliament demanded the “communitarisation” of a European policy to combat trafficking and on the related topics of immigration and asylum, and specifically on a right to asylum on the grounds of gender-based repression and persecution. The Council and Commission should also include in their political dialogue with third countries, the issue of the trafficking of women and children and – if no improvement is forthcoming or no clear signal is given by the third country of a political will to take action – take appropriate measures such as those listed in the human rights and democracy clauses in all cooperation and association agreements with third countries.

Parliament regretted the lack of reliable data on the phenomenon of trafficking in Europe and the fact that neither the Commission nor Europol, nor any other EU body, has been able to publish precise figures about the EU-wide extent of trafficking in human beings, and regretted particularly the lack of data on more vulnerable groups, such as women and children, and the failure to take effective steps to tackle the problem. It urged the Member States to launch national contact points or to appoint national rapporteurs to gather and process information on trafficking, and stressed the importance of gathering gender-based and comparable data, bearing in mind that it is of the utmost importance to ensure the confidentiality of information and to grant NGOs access to information and figures.

Research into the underlying causes of trafficking in human beings particularly trafficking in women and children for purposes of sexual exploitation - (i.e. what factors place people at risk of being trafficked and what factors affect demand for sexual services and sexual exploitation of women and children) should be carried out at both national and Community level. Action should be taken first and foremost with a view to explicitly discouraging demand by means which include educational, legal, social and cultural measures. Member States must make a stronger commitment to gender mainstreaming and to a child-sensitive approach in the EU development cooperation and poverty reduction programmes. Parliament regretted the lack of any analysis of the demand for prostitution in the Member States as a possible motivation for the phenomenon of trafficking. The Commission should carry out a comprehensive study on the impact of the Member States’ legislation on prostitution on the number of victims of trafficking. Parliament also called on the Commission and the Member States to tackle the tendency to use new technologies, particularly the Internet, to disseminate information about access to, and demand for, women and children for sexual exploitation, the increase in which affects the increase in trafficking.

Parliament went on to stress the link between sexual exploitation and labour exploitation in the provision of domestic services. Children and adolescents, subject to a dependence of which traffickers take advantage, are exploited not only sexually but also in ways connected with slavery, illegal adoption and forced labour.

The humiliating practice of buying and exploiting women and children should be made the subject of a campaign under EU programmes in this field. This campaign should be announced by the Commission and the Member States, with the unqualified support of the European Parliament and of all the other European institutions in their respective fields of competence. Parliament called on the Commission to submit an independent Daphne programme and ensure that it is kept distinct from the anti-drugs programme. It suggested that the Commission to launch an EU-wide Anti-Trafficking Day with an international anti-trafficking logo to raise general awareness of the phenomenon of trafficking in women and children and to increase public awareness and the visibility of the issue by addressing the public with one coherent message. This EU-wide Anti-Trafficking Day could coincide with the global campaign called "Stop the Traffic" on 25 March 2006.

Parliament called on the Member States to establish awareness-raising campaigns targeted at providing information about the dangers and educating vulnerable members of society in the countries of origin and to alert and raise the awareness of the public about the problem and reduce the demand in the countries of destination. In this regard, Member States must recognise that business travellers can be a part of the solution to trafficking if they are actively engaged in the awareness-raising process and are encouraged to report what they see. Parliament called on the Member States, especially on Germany, to take appropriate measures in the course of the World Cup football tournament in 2006 to prevent trafficking of women and forced prostitution.

Member States are asked to implement legislation that would strengthen the prosecution and punishment of traffickers, whether natural or legal persons, their accomplices, authors of websites that advertise trafficking agents, persons arranging or using seeking sexual services from minors, and to prosecute the laundering of the proceeds of trafficking. Member States should also prosecute clients who knowingly make use of the services of forced prostitutes.

People who have been subjected to sexual exploitation must be considered victims. Bearing in mind how immensely difficult it is for them to find a way out of their situation, both the EU and the Member States should take the necessary measures to protect and support them, such as not sentencing people who have been victims of trafficking; medical and psychological care; offering women and children support, either to return to their country of origin at their own request, or to make a new start.

Finally, Parliament regretted the lack of measurable added value delivered so far by the existing agencies and organisations at European level, especially the limited exchange of information between the Member States and Europol, which is the main European tool for fighting trafficking in human beings. Among its numerous analyses of specific crimes, Europol has so far produced only one analytical document in this field. Europol should give greater priority to combating trafficking.

Documents
2006/01/17
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/01/16
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2005/12/14
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2005/12/14
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2005/11/24
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report by Christa PRETS (PES, AT) on strategies to prevent the trafficking of women and children who are vulnerable to sexual exploitation. The report began by pointing out that trafficking in human beings for sexual purposes was the fastest growing criminal activity in the EU and that it was time to adopt "clear and specific" goals, such as halving the number of trafficking victims over the next 10 years. MEPs regretted that there was a lack of recognition of the links between trafficking and migration, social protection and development policy, and called for a more coherent external policy on trafficking. They also urged international organisations such as the World Bank, the IMF and the WTO to address the battle against the feminisation of poverty and child poverty as priority issues.

The report stressed that the supply and demand side of the problem must be addressed as well as the traffickers. It called for research to be carried out at both national and EU level into the underlying causes of trafficking in women and children for sexual exploitation, i.e. what factors place people at risk and what factors affect demand for sexual services and sexual exploitation of women and children. And it stressed that action should be taken first and foremost with a view to explicitly discouraging demand "by means which include educational, social and cultural measures".

The committee made a number of practical recommendations, such as awareness-raising campaigns to inform of the dangers and educate the vulnerable members of society in the countries of origin, to alert the public about the problem and reduce demand in the countries of destination. It called on the Commission to launch an EU-wide Anti-Trafficking Day with an international anti-trafficking logo to raise general awareness of the phenomenon and address the public "with one coherent message". The Member States were also urged to set up national and international telephone helplines.

MEPs also highlighted the need to tackle the tendency to use new technologies, in particular the Internet, for sexual exploitation. The report further called on the Member States, especially Germany , to take appropriate measures in the course of the World Cup football tournament in 2006 to prevent trafficking of women and forced prostitution.

To take action against traffickers, the committee called on the Member States to implement and enforce legislation that would strengthen the prosecution and punishment of traffickers (both natural and legal persons), their accomplices, persons encouraging, arranging or using sexual services from minors and persons attempting to institute such activities. Continuing action must also be taken against the laundering of the proceeds of trafficking.

Lastly, MEPs urged all Member States to follow the example of Belgium and Italy , which grant a " right of residence " for victims after the traffickers have been tried. They pointed out that this would encourage victims to give statements and help secure the conviction of offenders. They also stressed that it must be possible to give anonymous statements in the context of investigations into trafficking in order to ensure that more offenders are convicted.

2005/11/15
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2005/10/14
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2005/02/21
   EP - SEGELSTRÖM Inger (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2004/12/16
   EP - PRETS Christa (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2004/11/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Prets A6-0400/2005 - am. 5 #

2006/01/17 Outcome: +: 319, -: 280, 0: 25
PL IT DE SE SK FR EL IE CY FI SI LV LU CZ HU LT EE MT PT DK BE ES AT NL GB
Total
50
58
87
12
12
72
20
11
6
12
3
9
5
22
20
10
6
4
20
8
20
46
18
26
67
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
233

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
27

Slovakia NI

1

Czechia NI

1

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

4
icon: UEN UEN
28

Ireland UEN

3

Latvia UEN

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
28

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

3

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

Poland ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2
2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: PSE PSE
170

Slovakia PSE

Against (1)

3

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (2)

2

Rapport Prets A6-0400/2005 - am. 7 #

2006/01/17 Outcome: -: 310, +: 307, 0: 25
PL CZ IT SE EL IE CY DE LU HU LV SK SI MT FI PT EE LT ES DK AT GB BE FR NL
Total
51
23
60
12
21
10
6
90
3
20
9
12
6
4
12
20
6
13
48
12
18
71
22
67
26
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
238

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
28

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
28

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

France IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Germany GUE/NGL

4

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
28

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

2

Austria NI

2

United Kingdom NI

4

Belgium NI

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
78

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2
2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
171

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

Against (2)

2

Finland PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

2

Rapport Prets A6-0400/2005 - cons.J #

2006/01/17 Outcome: +: 588, -: 52, 0: 9
DE FR IT GB ES PL BE PT CZ HU EL AT NL SK FI DK LT SE SI CY EE MT LU IE LV
Total
92
69
60
71
48
51
21
21
23
20
22
16
26
14
12
11
13
13
6
6
6
4
4
11
9
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
237

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3
icon: PSE PSE
177

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
77

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
27

United Kingdom NI

4

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

For (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3
icon: UEN UEN
28

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2

Ireland UEN

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
29

France IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Rapport Prets A6-0400/2005 - résolution #

2006/01/17 Outcome: +: 622, 0: 19, -: 12
DE FR IT PL GB ES BE CZ PT EL HU AT NL LT FI SK DK SE IE LV SI CY EE LU MT
Total
91
71
59
52
72
48
22
23
21
22
19
17
25
13
13
14
11
13
11
9
6
6
6
5
4
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
239
2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
178

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
79

Spain ALDE

2

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

France GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: UEN UEN
28

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3
icon: NI NI
28

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
29

France IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2005-10-14T00:00:00
docs
title: PE364.684
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/0
date
2005-09-19T00:00:00
docs
title: PE362.715
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AM-364684_EN.html
docs/1
date
2005-10-14T00:00:00
docs
title: PE364.684
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/1
date
2005-11-15T00:00:00
docs
title: PE362.828
committee
LIBE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-362828_EN.html
docs/2
date
2005-11-15T00:00:00
docs
title: PE362.828
committee
LIBE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/3
date
2006-02-09T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4425&j=1&l=en title: SP(2006)0584
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4425&j=1&l=en
New
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4425&j=0&l=en
docs/4
date
2006-02-09T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4425&j=1&l=en title: SP(2006)0584
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/4
date
2006-05-10T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4425&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)0919
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4425&j=0&l=en
New
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4425&j=1&l=en
docs/5
date
2006-05-10T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4425&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)0919
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE362.828
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0400_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0400_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2005-12-14T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0400_EN.html title: A6-0400/2005
events/2
date
2005-12-14T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0400_EN.html title: A6-0400/2005
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060116&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20060116&type=CRE
events/5
date
2006-01-17T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0005_EN.html title: T6-0005/2006
summary
events/5
date
2006-01-17T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0005_EN.html title: T6-0005/2006
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: PRETS Christa date: 2004-12-16T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2004-12-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PRETS Christa group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: SEGELSTRÖM Inger date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2005-02-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SEGELSTRÖM Inger group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-400&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0400_EN.html
docs/4/body
EC
docs/5/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-400&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0400_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-5
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0005_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2004-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PSE name: PRETS Christa body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: SEGELSTRÖM Inger
  • date: 2005-11-24T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2004-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PSE name: PRETS Christa body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: SEGELSTRÖM Inger type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2005-12-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-400&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0400/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-01-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060116&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-01-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4425&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-5 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0005/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2004-12-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PRETS Christa group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
FEMM
date
2004-12-16T00:00:00
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
rapporteur
group: PSE name: PRETS Christa
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2005-02-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SEGELSTRÖM Inger group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
LIBE
date
2005-02-21T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: PSE name: SEGELSTRÖM Inger
docs
  • date: 2005-09-19T00:00:00 docs: title: PE362.715 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2005-10-14T00:00:00 docs: title: PE364.684 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2005-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE362.828 title: PE362.828 committee: LIBE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2005-12-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-400&language=EN title: A6-0400/2005 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-02-09T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4425&j=1&l=en title: SP(2006)0584 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2006-05-10T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4425&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)0919 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-11-24T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report by Christa PRETS (PES, AT) on strategies to prevent the trafficking of women and children who are vulnerable to sexual exploitation. The report began by pointing out that trafficking in human beings for sexual purposes was the fastest growing criminal activity in the EU and that it was time to adopt "clear and specific" goals, such as halving the number of trafficking victims over the next 10 years. MEPs regretted that there was a lack of recognition of the links between trafficking and migration, social protection and development policy, and called for a more coherent external policy on trafficking. They also urged international organisations such as the World Bank, the IMF and the WTO to address the battle against the feminisation of poverty and child poverty as priority issues. The report stressed that the supply and demand side of the problem must be addressed as well as the traffickers. It called for research to be carried out at both national and EU level into the underlying causes of trafficking in women and children for sexual exploitation, i.e. what factors place people at risk and what factors affect demand for sexual services and sexual exploitation of women and children. And it stressed that action should be taken first and foremost with a view to explicitly discouraging demand "by means which include educational, social and cultural measures". The committee made a number of practical recommendations, such as awareness-raising campaigns to inform of the dangers and educate the vulnerable members of society in the countries of origin, to alert the public about the problem and reduce demand in the countries of destination. It called on the Commission to launch an EU-wide Anti-Trafficking Day with an international anti-trafficking logo to raise general awareness of the phenomenon and address the public "with one coherent message". The Member States were also urged to set up national and international telephone helplines. MEPs also highlighted the need to tackle the tendency to use new technologies, in particular the Internet, for sexual exploitation. The report further called on the Member States, especially Germany , to take appropriate measures in the course of the World Cup football tournament in 2006 to prevent trafficking of women and forced prostitution. To take action against traffickers, the committee called on the Member States to implement and enforce legislation that would strengthen the prosecution and punishment of traffickers (both natural and legal persons), their accomplices, persons encouraging, arranging or using sexual services from minors and persons attempting to institute such activities. Continuing action must also be taken against the laundering of the proceeds of trafficking. Lastly, MEPs urged all Member States to follow the example of Belgium and Italy , which grant a " right of residence " for victims after the traffickers have been tried. They pointed out that this would encourage victims to give statements and help secure the conviction of offenders. They also stressed that it must be possible to give anonymous statements in the context of investigations into trafficking in order to ensure that more offenders are convicted.
  • date: 2005-12-14T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-400&language=EN title: A6-0400/2005
  • date: 2006-01-16T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060116&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-01-17T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4425&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-01-17T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-5 title: T6-0005/2006 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Christa PRETS (PES, AT) on strategies to prevent the trafficking of women and children who are vulnerable to sexual exploitation. (Please see the summary of 24/11/2005.) The report was adopted by 622 votes in favour, 12 against and 19 abstentions. Parliament began by recalling that e very year, over 100 000 women are the victims of trafficking in the EU. Trafficking is the fastest-growing criminal activity in comparison to other forms of organised crime. One of the principal preconditions for international trafficking in women and children is the existence of local prostitution markets where certain people can sell and buy women and children for the purpose of exploiting them sexually. Traffickers in human beings mainly send women and children from countries in the south to countries in the north and from east to west, where demand from purchasers is strongest. Parliament felt that it is necessary to address the prevention of trafficking not only through individual actions by each Member State but by a holistic and integrated multidisciplinary approach at the EU and international levels which would include the laying down of aspects of criminal law which are common to all the Member States and which relate in particular to effective, and dissuasive penalties. Building effective prevention strategies requires, inter alia: addressing the triangle of the trafficking market, i.e. victim, trafficker and client; systematic provision of information and raising awareness amongst all categories of the population and in particular amongst vulnerable groups; and cooperation among the countries of origin, transit and destination. Parliament deplored the fact that the measures which have so far been taken to reduce trafficking in human beings have not yielded results in the form of a reduction in the numbers of women and children being exploited in the sex slave trade. It also regretted that there is a lack of recognition of the links between trafficking and migration, social protection and development policy, and calls for more coherent external policy on trafficking. The Commission and Council are asked to create a clear legal basis for combating all forms of violence against women, including trafficking. Parliament demanded the “communitarisation” of a European policy to combat trafficking and on the related topics of immigration and asylum, and specifically on a right to asylum on the grounds of gender-based repression and persecution. The Council and Commission should also include in their political dialogue with third countries, the issue of the trafficking of women and children and – if no improvement is forthcoming or no clear signal is given by the third country of a political will to take action – take appropriate measures such as those listed in the human rights and democracy clauses in all cooperation and association agreements with third countries. Parliament regretted the lack of reliable data on the phenomenon of trafficking in Europe and the fact that neither the Commission nor Europol, nor any other EU body, has been able to publish precise figures about the EU-wide extent of trafficking in human beings, and regretted particularly the lack of data on more vulnerable groups, such as women and children, and the failure to take effective steps to tackle the problem. It urged the Member States to launch national contact points or to appoint national rapporteurs to gather and process information on trafficking, and stressed the importance of gathering gender-based and comparable data, bearing in mind that it is of the utmost importance to ensure the confidentiality of information and to grant NGOs access to information and figures. Research into the underlying causes of trafficking in human beings particularly trafficking in women and children for purposes of sexual exploitation - (i.e. what factors place people at risk of being trafficked and what factors affect demand for sexual services and sexual exploitation of women and children) should be carried out at both national and Community level. Action should be taken first and foremost with a view to explicitly discouraging demand by means which include educational, legal, social and cultural measures. Member States must make a stronger commitment to gender mainstreaming and to a child-sensitive approach in the EU development cooperation and poverty reduction programmes. Parliament regretted the lack of any analysis of the demand for prostitution in the Member States as a possible motivation for the phenomenon of trafficking. The Commission should carry out a comprehensive study on the impact of the Member States’ legislation on prostitution on the number of victims of trafficking. Parliament also called on the Commission and the Member States to tackle the tendency to use new technologies, particularly the Internet, to disseminate information about access to, and demand for, women and children for sexual exploitation, the increase in which affects the increase in trafficking. Parliament went on to stress the link between sexual exploitation and labour exploitation in the provision of domestic services. Children and adolescents, subject to a dependence of which traffickers take advantage, are exploited not only sexually but also in ways connected with slavery, illegal adoption and forced labour. The humiliating practice of buying and exploiting women and children should be made the subject of a campaign under EU programmes in this field. This campaign should be announced by the Commission and the Member States, with the unqualified support of the European Parliament and of all the other European institutions in their respective fields of competence. Parliament called on the Commission to submit an independent Daphne programme and ensure that it is kept distinct from the anti-drugs programme. It suggested that the Commission to launch an EU-wide Anti-Trafficking Day with an international anti-trafficking logo to raise general awareness of the phenomenon of trafficking in women and children and to increase public awareness and the visibility of the issue by addressing the public with one coherent message. This EU-wide Anti-Trafficking Day could coincide with the global campaign called "Stop the Traffic" on 25 March 2006. Parliament called on the Member States to establish awareness-raising campaigns targeted at providing information about the dangers and educating vulnerable members of society in the countries of origin and to alert and raise the awareness of the public about the problem and reduce the demand in the countries of destination. In this regard, Member States must recognise that business travellers can be a part of the solution to trafficking if they are actively engaged in the awareness-raising process and are encouraged to report what they see. Parliament called on the Member States, especially on Germany, to take appropriate measures in the course of the World Cup football tournament in 2006 to prevent trafficking of women and forced prostitution. Member States are asked to implement legislation that would strengthen the prosecution and punishment of traffickers, whether natural or legal persons, their accomplices, authors of websites that advertise trafficking agents, persons arranging or using seeking sexual services from minors, and to prosecute the laundering of the proceeds of trafficking. Member States should also prosecute clients who knowingly make use of the services of forced prostitutes. People who have been subjected to sexual exploitation must be considered victims. Bearing in mind how immensely difficult it is for them to find a way out of their situation, both the EU and the Member States should take the necessary measures to protect and support them, such as not sentencing people who have been victims of trafficking; medical and psychological care; offering women and children support, either to return to their country of origin at their own request, or to make a new start. Finally, Parliament regretted the lack of measurable added value delivered so far by the existing agencies and organisations at European level, especially the limited exchange of information between the Member States and Europol, which is the main European tool for fighting trafficking in human beings. Among its numerous analyses of specific crimes, Europol has so far produced only one analytical document in this field. Europol should give greater priority to combating trafficking.
  • date: 2006-01-17T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    FEMM/6/24509
    New
    • FEMM/6/24509
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 052
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 4.10.03 Child protection, children's rights
    • 4.10.09 Women condition and rights
    • 7.30.30.02 Action to combat violence, trafficking in human beings and migrant smuggling
    New
    4.10.03
    Child protection, children's rights
    4.10.09
    Women condition and rights
    7.30.30.02
    Action to combat violence, trafficking in human beings and migrant smuggling
    procedure/subject/2
    Old
    7.30.30.02 Action to combat violence and trafficking in human beings
    New
    7.30.30.02 Action to combat violence, trafficking in human beings and migrant smuggling
    activities
    • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2004-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PSE name: PRETS Christa body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: SEGELSTRÖM Inger
    • date: 2005-11-24T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2004-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PSE name: PRETS Christa body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: SEGELSTRÖM Inger type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 2005-12-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-400&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0400/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • date: 2006-01-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060116&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2006-01-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4425&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-5 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0005/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2004-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PSE name: PRETS Christa
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: SEGELSTRÖM Inger
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      FEMM/6/24509
      reference
      2004/2216(INI)
      title
      Strategies to prevent the trafficking of women and children vulnerable to sexual exploitation
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject