BETA


2004/2217(INI) Women and poverty

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead FEMM ZÁBORSKÁ Anna (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion INTA
Committee Opinion DEVE
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2006/01/10
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2005/11/24
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2005/10/13
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted the resolution based on an own-initiative report drafted by Anna ZÁBORSKÁ (EPP-ED, SK), on women and poverty.

Indicators and methodology: Parliament s tressed that poverty and social exclusion cannot be understood solely in economic terms, on the basis of figures, but must also be understood in terms of human rights. Poverty has various manifestations, including a lack of income, hunger and malnutrition, ill-health, limited or non-existent access to education and other basic services, increasing mortality, unsafe environments and social exclusion. In this context it is also characterised by a lack of participation in decision-making and in civil, social and cultural life. Extreme poverty gives rise to trafficking in women, to prostitution, to violence and more generally to exploitation of all kinds. Parliament called for these consequences of poverty also to be taken into account in the open coordination method and in the Social Policy Agenda. Parliament called for the following:

-the Commission and Council must recognise the informal economy and quantify the 'economics of life' using gender-specific approaches;

-Eurostat must develop a methodology and indicators broken down by gender, with a view to measuring the impact of poverty and social exclusion on women and on men;

-a study be carried out into the effects which the economic and political transformation undergone by the new Member States has had on the actual situation regarding equality between men and women;

-records to be kept of the cases of women who belong to minority groups and who work with no social security and pension rights, and to help them integrate smoothly into the labour market.

Partnership with the poorest women: Parliament d eplored the fact that, despite the political will shown to combat poverty and social exclusion through Community strategies, the Union has failed adequately to tackle the issue of the feminisation of poverty. There must be measures to promote a close partnership with the poorest women and families, so that the means for combating chronic poverty effectively can be drawn from their experience. All the institutions concerned must adjust the open coordination method and the operational framework for the Social Policy Agenda to the needs of women in situations of poverty.

Balancing family life and work by those living in poverty: Parliament s tressed that access to high-quality employment, including reasonable and fair remuneration, is the only way to avoid and combat poverty. Part-time work and low-quality employment, which affect mostly women, contribute to the increase of women amongst poor workers. There is a direct link between economic inequality and female dependency and the inequalities still existing between men and women in terms of access to education, family responsibilities and the general upkeep of a family. Parliament expressed indignation at the fact that (despite legislation which has been in existence for decades yet is still ineffective) the pay gap between the two sexes stood at 16% in 2001 and 15% in 2003. Unpaid work, which is mainly performed by women, is not systematically recorded in national statistics and is, therefore, not taken into account when employment policy is drawn up by the competent national and Community bodies. Parliament called on the Commission and the Member States to compile data relating to unpaid jobs with a view to promoting measures for a fairer distribution of those jobs. In addition, Member States are asked to ensure fair access by men and women to social security and pension systems, while allowing for career breaks and part-time working. They should also ensure that in pension-insurance subsystems the principle of equal treatment and social justice is applied consistently, in informal sectors, in order to guard against the pauperisation of the elderly, with specific reference to women. In most Member States, social welfare systems do not take sufficient account of the specific conditions of women living in poverty. The risk of falling into poverty is greater for women than for men, particularly in old age, where social security systems are based on the principle of continuous remunerated employment. Women often do not fulfil this requirement because of interruptions to their work and that they are penalised because of discrimination on the labour market.

Parliament also called on the Member States to devise effective ways of fostering a balance between work and family life for men and fathers as well, with due respect for their national legislation, given that the increased participation by women in the labour market has not been accompanied by a commensurate increase in male involvement in family responsibilities.

Contribution of civil society: Parliament c ommended the daily struggle by the poorest women against extreme poverty and the work performed by those who assist and support them on a voluntary basis. Member States must make a greater effort to improve the availability of social services, in view of the fact that the availability of high-quality social services providing care for children and other family members determines whether or not the groups which are at greatest risk (i.e. women who are the heads of single-parent families) are able to work. NGOs and civil society organisations were commended by Parliament.

2005/10/13
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2005/10/13
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted the resolution based on an own-initiative report drafted by Anna ZÁBORSKÁ (EPP-ED, SK), on women and poverty.

Indicators and methodology: Parliament s tressed that poverty and social exclusion cannot be understood solely in economic terms, on the basis of figures, but must also be understood in terms of human rights. Poverty has various manifestations, including a lack of income, hunger and malnutrition, ill-health, limited or non-existent access to education and other basic services, increasing mortality, unsafe environments and social exclusion. In this context it is also characterised by a lack of participation in decision-making and in civil, social and cultural life. Extreme poverty gives rise to trafficking in women, to prostitution, to violence and more generally to exploitation of all kinds. Parliament called for these consequences of poverty also to be taken into account in the open coordination method and in the Social Policy Agenda. Parliament called for the following:

-the Commission and Council must recognise the informal economy and quantify the 'economics of life' using gender-specific approaches;

-Eurostat must develop a methodology and indicators broken down by gender, with a view to measuring the impact of poverty and social exclusion on women and on men;

-a study be carried out into the effects which the economic and political transformation undergone by the new Member States has had on the actual situation regarding equality between men and women;

-records to be kept of the cases of women who belong to minority groups and who work with no social security and pension rights, and to help them integrate smoothly into the labour market.

Partnership with the poorest women: Parliament d eplored the fact that, despite the political will shown to combat poverty and social exclusion through Community strategies, the Union has failed adequately to tackle the issue of the feminisation of poverty. There must be measures to promote a close partnership with the poorest women and families, so that the means for combating chronic poverty effectively can be drawn from their experience. All the institutions concerned must adjust the open coordination method and the operational framework for the Social Policy Agenda to the needs of women in situations of poverty.

Balancing family life and work by those living in poverty: Parliament s tressed that access to high-quality employment, including reasonable and fair remuneration, is the only way to avoid and combat poverty. Part-time work and low-quality employment, which affect mostly women, contribute to the increase of women amongst poor workers. There is a direct link between economic inequality and female dependency and the inequalities still existing between men and women in terms of access to education, family responsibilities and the general upkeep of a family. Parliament expressed indignation at the fact that (despite legislation which has been in existence for decades yet is still ineffective) the pay gap between the two sexes stood at 16% in 2001 and 15% in 2003. Unpaid work, which is mainly performed by women, is not systematically recorded in national statistics and is, therefore, not taken into account when employment policy is drawn up by the competent national and Community bodies. Parliament called on the Commission and the Member States to compile data relating to unpaid jobs with a view to promoting measures for a fairer distribution of those jobs. In addition, Member States are asked to ensure fair access by men and women to social security and pension systems, while allowing for career breaks and part-time working. They should also ensure that in pension-insurance subsystems the principle of equal treatment and social justice is applied consistently, in informal sectors, in order to guard against the pauperisation of the elderly, with specific reference to women. In most Member States, social welfare systems do not take sufficient account of the specific conditions of women living in poverty. The risk of falling into poverty is greater for women than for men, particularly in old age, where social security systems are based on the principle of continuous remunerated employment. Women often do not fulfil this requirement because of interruptions to their work and that they are penalised because of discrimination on the labour market.

Parliament also called on the Member States to devise effective ways of fostering a balance between work and family life for men and fathers as well, with due respect for their national legislation, given that the increased participation by women in the labour market has not been accompanied by a commensurate increase in male involvement in family responsibilities.

Contribution of civil society: Parliament c ommended the daily struggle by the poorest women against extreme poverty and the work performed by those who assist and support them on a voluntary basis. Member States must make a greater effort to improve the availability of social services, in view of the fact that the availability of high-quality social services providing care for children and other family members determines whether or not the groups which are at greatest risk (i.e. women who are the heads of single-parent families) are able to work. NGOs and civil society organisations were commended by Parliament.

Documents
2005/10/13
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2005/10/12
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2005/09/29
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
2005/09/22
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2005/09/22
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2005/09/13
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report by its chair, Anna ZÁBORSKÁ ( EPP-ED , SK ), on women and poverty. The report looked at four main areas: the development of gender-based indicators and methodology, so as to measure the differing impact of poverty and social exclusion on women and men; the importance of involving poor women and families at all levels of decision-making; measures to improve the balance of family life and work in a disadvantaged environment; and the contribution of civil society.

MEPs emphasised that "poverty has various manifestations", including a lack o f income, ill-health, limited or non-existent access to education, unsafe environments and social discrimination and exclusion. They added that poverty was also characterised by lack of participation in decision-making and in civil, social and cultural life. Moreover, extreme poverty situations were conducive to trafficking in women, to prostitution and to violence . These consequences of poverty should also be taken into account in the open coordination method and in the Social Policy Agenda.

The report deplored the fact that the EU had failed to tackle adequately the "feminisation of poverty", and called for a close partnership with the poorest women and families to be forged at all levels of the decision-making process so that policies could be tailored to their real needs. The Commission and the Member States were urged to involve social partners at local and regional level, whose members include rural women living on the edge of poverty, in social dialogue on the development and implementation of education, employment and pension policies.

MEPs stressed that the risk of falling into poverty was greater for women than for men, particularly in old age, given that most social security systems are based on the principle of continuous remunerated employment. Many women did not fulfil this requirement because of interruptions in their work, due to the unbalanced distribution of paid and unpaid work. The Member States were urged to ensure that appropriate social security is made available for women responsible for the care of sick, elderly or disabled members of their families and for elderly women who receive a particularly low pension. MEPs also called for effective ways of fostering a balance between work and family life for men and fathers as well, "given that the increased participation by women in the labour market has not been accompanied by a commensurate increase in male involvement in family responsibilities".

Lastly, the report called on the Member States to make a greater effort to improve the availability of social services, and paid tribute to the work of voluntary organisations committed to working with the most disadvantaged groups.

2005/08/30
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2004/11/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2004/10/14
   EP - ZÁBORSKÁ Anna (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2005-08-30T00:00:00
docs
title: PE362.574
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/0
date
2005-06-27T00:00:00
docs
title: PE360.163
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AM-362574_EN.html
docs/1
date
2005-08-30T00:00:00
docs
title: PE362.574
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0273_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0273_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1074)(documentyear:2005)(documentlanguage:EN)
New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1074)(documentyear:2005)(documentlanguage:EN)
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0388_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0388_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2005-09-22T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0273_EN.html title: A6-0273/2005
events/2
date
2005-09-22T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0273_EN.html title: A6-0273/2005
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20051012&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20051012&type=CRE
events/5
date
2005-10-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0388_EN.html title: T6-0388/2005
summary
events/5
date
2005-10-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0388_EN.html title: T6-0388/2005
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: ZÁBORSKÁ Anna date: 2004-10-14T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2004-10-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ZÁBORSKÁ Anna group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-273&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0273_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-388
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0388_EN.html
docs/5/body
EC
docs/6/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-273&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0273_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-388
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0388_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2004-10-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: ZÁBORSKÁ Anna body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • date: 2005-09-13T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2004-10-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: ZÁBORSKÁ Anna body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2005-09-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-273&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0273/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2005-10-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20051012&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-10-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4245&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-388 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0388/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2004-10-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ZÁBORSKÁ Anna group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
FEMM
date
2004-10-14T00:00:00
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: ZÁBORSKÁ Anna
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
docs
  • date: 2005-06-27T00:00:00 docs: title: PE360.163 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2005-08-30T00:00:00 docs: title: PE362.574 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2005-09-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-273&language=EN title: A6-0273/2005 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-09-29T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1074)(documentyear:2005)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES1074/2005 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2006:024:0095:0101:EN:PDF title: OJ C 024 31.01.2006, p. 0095-0101 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
  • date: 2005-10-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-388 title: T6-0388/2005 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2006:233E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 233 28.09.2006, p. 0021-0130 E summary: The European Parliament adopted the resolution based on an own-initiative report drafted by Anna ZÁBORSKÁ (EPP-ED, SK), on women and poverty. Indicators and methodology: Parliament s tressed that poverty and social exclusion cannot be understood solely in economic terms, on the basis of figures, but must also be understood in terms of human rights. Poverty has various manifestations, including a lack of income, hunger and malnutrition, ill-health, limited or non-existent access to education and other basic services, increasing mortality, unsafe environments and social exclusion. In this context it is also characterised by a lack of participation in decision-making and in civil, social and cultural life. Extreme poverty gives rise to trafficking in women, to prostitution, to violence and more generally to exploitation of all kinds. Parliament called for these consequences of poverty also to be taken into account in the open coordination method and in the Social Policy Agenda. Parliament called for the following: -the Commission and Council must recognise the informal economy and quantify the 'economics of life' using gender-specific approaches; -Eurostat must develop a methodology and indicators broken down by gender, with a view to measuring the impact of poverty and social exclusion on women and on men; -a study be carried out into the effects which the economic and political transformation undergone by the new Member States has had on the actual situation regarding equality between men and women; -records to be kept of the cases of women who belong to minority groups and who work with no social security and pension rights, and to help them integrate smoothly into the labour market. Partnership with the poorest women: Parliament d eplored the fact that, despite the political will shown to combat poverty and social exclusion through Community strategies, the Union has failed adequately to tackle the issue of the feminisation of poverty. There must be measures to promote a close partnership with the poorest women and families, so that the means for combating chronic poverty effectively can be drawn from their experience. All the institutions concerned must adjust the open coordination method and the operational framework for the Social Policy Agenda to the needs of women in situations of poverty. Balancing family life and work by those living in poverty: Parliament s tressed that access to high-quality employment, including reasonable and fair remuneration, is the only way to avoid and combat poverty. Part-time work and low-quality employment, which affect mostly women, contribute to the increase of women amongst poor workers. There is a direct link between economic inequality and female dependency and the inequalities still existing between men and women in terms of access to education, family responsibilities and the general upkeep of a family. Parliament expressed indignation at the fact that (despite legislation which has been in existence for decades yet is still ineffective) the pay gap between the two sexes stood at 16% in 2001 and 15% in 2003. Unpaid work, which is mainly performed by women, is not systematically recorded in national statistics and is, therefore, not taken into account when employment policy is drawn up by the competent national and Community bodies. Parliament called on the Commission and the Member States to compile data relating to unpaid jobs with a view to promoting measures for a fairer distribution of those jobs. In addition, Member States are asked to ensure fair access by men and women to social security and pension systems, while allowing for career breaks and part-time working. They should also ensure that in pension-insurance subsystems the principle of equal treatment and social justice is applied consistently, in informal sectors, in order to guard against the pauperisation of the elderly, with specific reference to women. In most Member States, social welfare systems do not take sufficient account of the specific conditions of women living in poverty. The risk of falling into poverty is greater for women than for men, particularly in old age, where social security systems are based on the principle of continuous remunerated employment. Women often do not fulfil this requirement because of interruptions to their work and that they are penalised because of discrimination on the labour market. Parliament also called on the Member States to devise effective ways of fostering a balance between work and family life for men and fathers as well, with due respect for their national legislation, given that the increased participation by women in the labour market has not been accompanied by a commensurate increase in male involvement in family responsibilities. Contribution of civil society: Parliament c ommended the daily struggle by the poorest women against extreme poverty and the work performed by those who assist and support them on a voluntary basis. Member States must make a greater effort to improve the availability of social services, in view of the fact that the availability of high-quality social services providing care for children and other family members determines whether or not the groups which are at greatest risk (i.e. women who are the heads of single-parent families) are able to work. NGOs and civil society organisations were commended by Parliament. type: Text adopted by Parliament, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-11-24T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4245&j=0&l=en title: SP(2005)4593 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2006-01-10T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4245&j=1&l=en title: SP(2005)4634 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-09-13T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report by its chair, Anna ZÁBORSKÁ ( EPP-ED , SK ), on women and poverty. The report looked at four main areas: the development of gender-based indicators and methodology, so as to measure the differing impact of poverty and social exclusion on women and men; the importance of involving poor women and families at all levels of decision-making; measures to improve the balance of family life and work in a disadvantaged environment; and the contribution of civil society. MEPs emphasised that "poverty has various manifestations", including a lack o f income, ill-health, limited or non-existent access to education, unsafe environments and social discrimination and exclusion. They added that poverty was also characterised by lack of participation in decision-making and in civil, social and cultural life. Moreover, extreme poverty situations were conducive to trafficking in women, to prostitution and to violence . These consequences of poverty should also be taken into account in the open coordination method and in the Social Policy Agenda. The report deplored the fact that the EU had failed to tackle adequately the "feminisation of poverty", and called for a close partnership with the poorest women and families to be forged at all levels of the decision-making process so that policies could be tailored to their real needs. The Commission and the Member States were urged to involve social partners at local and regional level, whose members include rural women living on the edge of poverty, in social dialogue on the development and implementation of education, employment and pension policies. MEPs stressed that the risk of falling into poverty was greater for women than for men, particularly in old age, given that most social security systems are based on the principle of continuous remunerated employment. Many women did not fulfil this requirement because of interruptions in their work, due to the unbalanced distribution of paid and unpaid work. The Member States were urged to ensure that appropriate social security is made available for women responsible for the care of sick, elderly or disabled members of their families and for elderly women who receive a particularly low pension. MEPs also called for effective ways of fostering a balance between work and family life for men and fathers as well, "given that the increased participation by women in the labour market has not been accompanied by a commensurate increase in male involvement in family responsibilities". Lastly, the report called on the Member States to make a greater effort to improve the availability of social services, and paid tribute to the work of voluntary organisations committed to working with the most disadvantaged groups.
  • date: 2005-09-22T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-273&language=EN title: A6-0273/2005
  • date: 2005-10-12T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20051012&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-10-13T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4245&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2005-10-13T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-388 title: T6-0388/2005 summary: The European Parliament adopted the resolution based on an own-initiative report drafted by Anna ZÁBORSKÁ (EPP-ED, SK), on women and poverty. Indicators and methodology: Parliament s tressed that poverty and social exclusion cannot be understood solely in economic terms, on the basis of figures, but must also be understood in terms of human rights. Poverty has various manifestations, including a lack of income, hunger and malnutrition, ill-health, limited or non-existent access to education and other basic services, increasing mortality, unsafe environments and social exclusion. In this context it is also characterised by a lack of participation in decision-making and in civil, social and cultural life. Extreme poverty gives rise to trafficking in women, to prostitution, to violence and more generally to exploitation of all kinds. Parliament called for these consequences of poverty also to be taken into account in the open coordination method and in the Social Policy Agenda. Parliament called for the following: -the Commission and Council must recognise the informal economy and quantify the 'economics of life' using gender-specific approaches; -Eurostat must develop a methodology and indicators broken down by gender, with a view to measuring the impact of poverty and social exclusion on women and on men; -a study be carried out into the effects which the economic and political transformation undergone by the new Member States has had on the actual situation regarding equality between men and women; -records to be kept of the cases of women who belong to minority groups and who work with no social security and pension rights, and to help them integrate smoothly into the labour market. Partnership with the poorest women: Parliament d eplored the fact that, despite the political will shown to combat poverty and social exclusion through Community strategies, the Union has failed adequately to tackle the issue of the feminisation of poverty. There must be measures to promote a close partnership with the poorest women and families, so that the means for combating chronic poverty effectively can be drawn from their experience. All the institutions concerned must adjust the open coordination method and the operational framework for the Social Policy Agenda to the needs of women in situations of poverty. Balancing family life and work by those living in poverty: Parliament s tressed that access to high-quality employment, including reasonable and fair remuneration, is the only way to avoid and combat poverty. Part-time work and low-quality employment, which affect mostly women, contribute to the increase of women amongst poor workers. There is a direct link between economic inequality and female dependency and the inequalities still existing between men and women in terms of access to education, family responsibilities and the general upkeep of a family. Parliament expressed indignation at the fact that (despite legislation which has been in existence for decades yet is still ineffective) the pay gap between the two sexes stood at 16% in 2001 and 15% in 2003. Unpaid work, which is mainly performed by women, is not systematically recorded in national statistics and is, therefore, not taken into account when employment policy is drawn up by the competent national and Community bodies. Parliament called on the Commission and the Member States to compile data relating to unpaid jobs with a view to promoting measures for a fairer distribution of those jobs. In addition, Member States are asked to ensure fair access by men and women to social security and pension systems, while allowing for career breaks and part-time working. They should also ensure that in pension-insurance subsystems the principle of equal treatment and social justice is applied consistently, in informal sectors, in order to guard against the pauperisation of the elderly, with specific reference to women. In most Member States, social welfare systems do not take sufficient account of the specific conditions of women living in poverty. The risk of falling into poverty is greater for women than for men, particularly in old age, where social security systems are based on the principle of continuous remunerated employment. Women often do not fulfil this requirement because of interruptions to their work and that they are penalised because of discrimination on the labour market. Parliament also called on the Member States to devise effective ways of fostering a balance between work and family life for men and fathers as well, with due respect for their national legislation, given that the increased participation by women in the labour market has not been accompanied by a commensurate increase in male involvement in family responsibilities. Contribution of civil society: Parliament c ommended the daily struggle by the poorest women against extreme poverty and the work performed by those who assist and support them on a voluntary basis. Member States must make a greater effort to improve the availability of social services, in view of the fact that the availability of high-quality social services providing care for children and other family members determines whether or not the groups which are at greatest risk (i.e. women who are the heads of single-parent families) are able to work. NGOs and civil society organisations were commended by Parliament.
  • date: 2005-10-13T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    FEMM/6/24510
    New
    • FEMM/6/24510
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 052
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 4.10.05 Social inclusion, poverty, minimum income
    • 4.10.09 Women condition and rights
    New
    4.10.05
    Social inclusion, poverty, minimum income
    4.10.09
    Women condition and rights
    activities
    • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2004-10-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: ZÁBORSKÁ Anna body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
    • date: 2005-09-13T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2004-10-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: ZÁBORSKÁ Anna body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 2005-09-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-273&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0273/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • date: 2005-10-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20051012&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2005-10-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4245&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-388 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0388/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2004-10-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: ZÁBORSKÁ Anna
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      FEMM/6/24510
      reference
      2004/2217(INI)
      title
      Women and poverty
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject