BETA


2004/2252(INI) The role of the European Union in the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals MDGs

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead DEVE KINNOCK Glenys (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion AFET
Committee Opinion FEMM
Committee Opinion INTA LUCAS Caroline (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion ENVI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2005/07/22
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2005/05/19
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2005/04/12
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2005/04/12
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
Details

Parliament adopted an own-initiative report by 539 votes in favour, 52 against with 19 abstentions, on the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. The report was drafted by Glenys KINNOCK (PES, UK). (Please see the summary of 16/03/05). Parliament also stressed that the target of 20 % for basic education and health should be included in the budget of the EU and the European Development Fund, expanding on the existing target of 35 % for basic social services.

It also expressed its conviction that the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) and Country Strategy Papers (CSPs) could be important tools for achieving the MDGs but felt that they need to be revised to better support the MDGs. Parliament called for the ‘quick wins’ to be enshrined in PRSPs and CSPs to make them part of a sustainable and structural approach.

Parliament went on to call for an increased EU contribution to the Global Health Fund, since money so far pledged for 2005 is only 1/4 of the amount needed. The EU and others must work to avoid duplication of effort and promote national ownership of HIV/AIDS, TB and malaria policies.

2005/04/12
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

PURPOSE: to present a communication from the Commission on the EU’s contribution to speed up progress towards the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

CONTENT: this communication takes stock of the EU’s contribution to development and identifies the

measures that need to be taken to speed up achievement of the MDGs. The EU’s consolidated report on the MDGs, which was drawn up by the Commission at the request of the Member States, shows that the input of the Community and its Member States to the international community’s efforts is substantial. The EU must now do even more.

The report states that in the face of major development challenges, Europe, as a global player, has special responsibilities to shoulder and must fully take on its political role in order to increase the resources for development and the effectiveness of cooperation, and to give adequate support to sub-Saharan Africa, which is behind on progress to many goals.

The consolidated EU report on the MDGs and the report on the follow-up to the Barcelona commitments have highlighted the importance of the efforts made so far. This communication, together with the specific proposals on financing for development and policy coherence for development, sets out guidelines for future action.

Africa , too, can change. Africa has given proof of its willingness to assume responsibility for its political and socio-economic development. A number of countries have embarked on the transition to democracy, peace is returning in many parts of the continent, and economic growth is picking up. The emergence of the African Union and the NEPAD initiative has given birth to an ambitious institutional structure and a charter that places governance and freedom at the heart of development. This year, 2005, could be Africa’s year. Europe must show that it is up to dealing with these developments and playing a leading role in supporting Africa; most importantly this includes giving Africa priority for financing, so helping to fulfil the commitments made by the G8 in 2002. Africa’s road to sustainable development and achievement of the MDGs is a long and hard one. A new dynamic must now be set in motion, the EU and Africa can and must work together to make it happen.

This communication, together with the communications on financing and coherence and related reports, forms the framework of the EU’s contribution to the UN High-Level Event in September this year on the subject of development and synergies with other policies. On this basis, the Commission asks the Council to finalise the EU’s proposals and commitments with a view to speeding up progress to the Millennium Development Goals.

In addition to this, the process now under way should also pave the way for a new declaration on EU development policy designed to lay down a true European Development Strategy. At the Kananaskis Summit (2002) the G8 pledged to allocate at least 50% of additional ODA to Africa. If this pledge were made at EU level and if current trends continue (keeping of Barcelona commitments for 2006), this would mean an additional allocation of more than EUR 6.5 billion a year for Africa.

2005/04/12
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

PURPOSE: to present a Commission communication on accelerating progress towards attaining the Millennium Development Goals – financing for development and aid effectiveness.

CONTENT: the Communication outlines a way towards a possible new interim target for increased Official Development Assistance (ODA) volumes in the EU by 2010 and towards the UN target for ODA of 0.7% Gross National Income (GNI) by 2015. It suggests new aid modalities as well as a line on innovative finance sources and proposes ways to address the remaining post-Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) debt problems of low income countries. With regard to Global Public Goods it suggests redefining the EU commitment. On coordination and harmonisation the main challenge ahead lies in credible implementation of the recently agreed EU framework as well as of the results of the recent High Level Forum on aid effectiveness and concrete steps forward on complementarity in aid delivery. The commitment on reform of the International Finance System must be strengthened.

The EU is well on track to deliver on most of the “Barcelona commitments”. The UN High Level Event in September 2005 will focus on how to accelerate progress towards attaining the MDGs, especially in Africa. This challenges the enlarged EU to again demonstrate its commitment to addressing the Financing for Development (FfD) challenge through reinforced EU commitments. With the proposals included in this document, the Commission intends to initiate a discussion with a view to establishing a new set of commitments and to reach an agreement on “Barcelona II”-type commitments. Whereas this Communication focuses on the tools for improved FfD, the Communication on Policy Coherence proposes other policy measures that could be undertaken to support the achievement of the MDGs.

2005/04/12
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

PURPOSE: to present a Commission communication on accelerating progress towards attaining the Millennium Development Goals – policy coherence for development.

CONTENT: this Communication presents the Commission proposals on the subject of policy coherence. These are set out as follows:

Trade: t he EU is strongly committed to ensuring a development-friendly and sustainable outcome of the Doha Development Agenda and EU-ACP Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs). The EU will further improve its Generalised System of Preferences, with a view to effectively enhancing developing countries’ exports to the EU. The EU will continue to work towards integrating trade into development strategies and will assist developing countries in carrying out domestic reforms where necessary.

Environment: t he EU will lead global efforts to curb unsustainable consumption and production patterns. The EU will assist developing countries in implementing the Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs), and will work to ensure that the capacities of developing countries are taken into account during MEA negotiations. The EU will continue to promote pro-poor environment-related initiatives and policies.

Security: t he EU will treat security and development as complementary agendas, with the common aim of creating a secure environment and of breaking the vicious circle of poverty, war, environmental degradation and failing economic, social and political structures. The EU will enhance its policies in support of good and effective governance and the prevention of state fragility and conflict, including by strengthening its response to difficult partnerships/failing states. The EU will strengthen the control of its arms exports, with the aim of avoiding that EU-manufactured weaponry be used against civilian populations or aggravate existing tensions or conflicts in developing countries. The EU will promote cooperation in fighting corruption, organised crime and terrorism.

Agriculture: t he EU will continue its efforts to minimise the level of trade distortion related to its support measures to the agricultural sector, and to facilitate developing countries’ agricultural development.

Fisheries: t he EC will continue to pay particular attention to the development objectives of the countries with which the Community will engage into bilateral fisheries agreements. Within the context of the new EC policy on fisheries partnership agreements with third countries which is being implemented since 2003, the EC will continue to encourage the conclusion of fisheries agreements in order to contribute towards rational and sustainable exploitation of the surplus of coastal States’ marine resources to the mutual benefit of both parties.

Social dimension of globalisation, employment and decent work: t he EU will contribute to strengthening the Social Dimension of Globalisation with a view to ensure maximum benefits for all, both men and women. The EU will promote employment and decent work for all as a global goal. Migration: the EU will promote the synergies between migration and development, to make migration a positive factor for development.

Research and innovation: t he EU will promote the integration of development objectives, where appropriate, into its RTD and Innovation policies, and will continue to assist developing countries in enhancing their domestic capacities in this area.

Information society: t he EU will address the digital divide by exploiting the potential of Information and Communication Technologies as a development tool and as a significant resource for attaining the MDGs.

Transport: t he EU will address the special needs of both land-locked and coastal developing countries by promoting the intermodality issues for achieving network interconnectivity as well as security and safety issues.

Energy: t he EU is strongly committed to contribute to the special needs of developing countries by promoting access to sustainable energy sources and by supporting establishing interconnection of energy infrastructures and networks.

To a considerable extent the above coherence commitments already steer EU policies. A lot of action has already been undertaken, and many new actions have already been planned.

What provides the raison d’etre for this Communication is that these commitments and actions are assessed within the framework of global efforts to achieve the MDGs. By recognizing that these policy objectives should be considered as Coherence for Development Commitments in the context of the MDGs, the EU reconfirms and strengthens its engagement to effectively deliver on these orientations, against the background of the given MDG timeframe between now and 2015.

Lastly, to further enhance EU policy coherence in the specific context of supporting the MDGs, the Commission will compile a mid-term EU Policy Coherence for Development Report, between now and the next international MDG Review, where progress on the coherence commitments proposed in this Communication will be reviewed.

2005/04/12
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2005/04/12
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2005/04/12
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

Parliament adopted an own-initiative report by 539 votes in favour, 52 against with 19 abstentions, on the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. The report was drafted by Glenys KINNOCK (PES, UK). (Please see the summary of 16/03/05). Parliament also stressed that the target of 20 % for basic education and health should be included in the budget of the EU and the European Development Fund, expanding on the existing target of 35 % for basic social services.

It also expressed its conviction that the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) and Country Strategy Papers (CSPs) could be important tools for achieving the MDGs but felt that they need to be revised to better support the MDGs. Parliament called for the ‘quick wins’ to be enshrined in PRSPs and CSPs to make them part of a sustainable and structural approach.

Parliament went on to call for an increased EU contribution to the Global Health Fund, since money so far pledged for 2005 is only 1/4 of the amount needed. The EU and others must work to avoid duplication of effort and promote national ownership of HIV/AIDS, TB and malaria policies.

Documents
2005/04/12
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2005/03/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2005/03/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2005/03/16
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report by Glenys KINNOCK ( PES , UK ) on the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The committee emphasised that poverty reduction through the achievement of the MDGs and the Millennium Declaration must be recognised unambiguously as the overarching framework for EU development policy and that this must be reflected clearly in all relevant policy and legislative proposals. However, it believed that the MDGs should not be seen as a technical matter which could be resolved simply by providing more money without identifying and tackling the underlying causes of poverty.

MEPs commended those Member States that had reached or passed 0.7% GNI, whilst noting the worrying trend set by some to begin a process of decreasing aid levels, as well as abandoning previous commitments on timetables. The committee stressed that, although the EU seemed currently on target for its intermediary objective of 0.39% of GNI for Official Development Assistance (ODA) in 2006, there were large disparities in the performance of its Member States. It therefore called on those Members States still lagging behind to commit themselves to a clear timetable and deadlines for reaching the 0.7% target before 2015.

Lastly, the report said that it was an illusion to achieve the MDG of halving poverty and hunger by 2015, providing free education for all and improving access to health care while developing countries spend four times more on repaying debts than they spend on basic social services.

2005/02/22
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2005/01/18
   EP - LUCAS Caroline (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2005/01/13
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2004/12/02
   EP - KINNOCK Glenys (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2004/10/29
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Details

In September 2000, world leaders from 189 nations agreed and signed the UN Millennium Declaration, binding them to a global project to decisively reduce extreme poverty in all its key dimensions. The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) that derive from this Declaration provide an agenda for global action. This agenda and the outcomes of the World Social Summit, the World Summit on Sustainable Development, the Doha Development Agenda and the Monterrey Consensus are mutually supportive processes and essential building blocks of a worldwide partnership for sustainable development.

Over the last four decades, EC development assistance has evolved from a fragmented focus on countries with which EU Member States had strong colonial or other traditional links, to a set of regional co-operation and partnership frameworks providing almost global coverage. During the 1990s, the policies and practices of EC development cooperation gradually integrated into a new global development framework aimed at poverty eradication, promotion of gender equality, access to primary education, improving health and provision of other basic services, as well as sustainable development, and the establishment of global partnerships. The EU has been a major force in this process, and has expressed on numerous occasions its full commitment to ensuring a successful conclusion.

In the Council conclusions of 26 April 2004, the General Affairs Council once again confirmed that achieving the Millennium Development Goals is a key objective for the European Union. In September 2005, the UN General Assembly will take stock of the progress made by UN Members in the implementation of this global development agenda. In preparation for this event, the Commission has compiled this report on the EC contribution towards achieving MDGs.

The report provides information on the extent to which the EC has focused its strategies, procedures and instruments on the implementation of the Millennium Declaration and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. It outlines how the EC contributes to progress towards the MDGs, and lists the further actions that are currently foreseen to promote the implementation of the Millennium Development Goals.

The report does not address in detail the progress made in and by developing countries, which is the subject of the progress reports drafted by the countries in question. Nor does it look at the performance of EU Member States, as this will be carried out at national level in the Member State reports. The Member State reports, together with the EC report, will provide the basis for an EU synthesis report, due in early 2005. In contrast with the forthcoming synthesis report, the EC report will not propose new measures, but instead limits itself to an inventory of areas where further action may be considered.

Over the coming months, the European Commission will prepare, in close dialogue with the EU Member States, proposals for an EU contribution to the MDG stocktaking event. The level of our ambition can only be high. The EU claims leadership that, in turn, requires political courage and commitment. The EU has expressed the will to make a difference. This implies that the gap between theory and practice needs to be bridged and that words are backed up with resources and action.

The EU synthesis report shall give an answer to the question of how to finance the MDGs, and how funding can be channelled and used more effectively to accelerate impact. It shall look into new actions on other policy areas captured by MDG8, such as policy coherence, trade and debt sustainability. Finally, the EC shall consider using the UN 2005 Major Event platform for the launching of a major new EU initiative on Africa.

Documents

Votes

Rapport Kinnock A6-0075/2005 - am. 11 #

2005/04/12 Outcome: -: 360, +: 272, 0: 8
PL CZ SK HU LV EL IE SI MT LU CY ES IT AT EE NL LT DE PT BE DK FI SE GB FR
Total
51
23
13
21
9
21
12
6
5
6
5
48
55
18
6
25
10
90
24
22
13
14
15
63
65
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
238

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
27

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

For (1)

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

France IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
24

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Austria NI

For (1)

3

Belgium NI

For (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: UEN UEN
20

Ireland UEN

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Hungary ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: PSE PSE
179

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Rapport Kinnock A6-0075/2005 - am. 12 #

2005/04/12 Outcome: -: 364, +: 256, 0: 11
PL IE HU SK CZ EL SI LU MT LV ES CY IT AT LT DE EE PT BE FI SE DK NL GB FR
Total
50
12
21
13
22
19
6
6
5
9
47
5
55
18
10
90
6
24
21
14
15
13
25
61
64
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
233

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

2
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
3
4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
24

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4
icon: NI NI
24

Slovakia NI

2

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Italy NI

For (1)

2

Austria NI

For (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3
icon: UEN UEN
20

Ireland UEN

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: PSE PSE
179

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Rapport Kinnock A6-0075/2005 - am. 14 #

2005/04/12 Outcome: -: 355, +: 262, 0: 19
PL IE HU LV CZ SK EL IT SI LU MT CY AT LT ES EE DE PT BE FI DK SE NL GB FR
Total
51
12
21
9
21
13
21
54
6
6
5
5
18
10
48
6
91
24
21
14
13
15
25
62
65
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
236

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
20

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
28

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2
5

France IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
23

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Austria NI

For (1)

3

Belgium NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: PSE PSE
179

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Rapport Kinnock A6-0075/2005 - am. 15 #

2005/04/12 Outcome: -: 364, +: 262, 0: 14
PL IE HU LV SK CZ EL SI LU IT CY MT AT LT ES DE EE PT BE SE DK FI GB NL FR
Total
51
12
21
9
13
22
21
6
6
55
5
5
18
10
48
90
6
24
21
15
13
14
64
25
66
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
239

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

2

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Belgium PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
28

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Italy IND/DEM

For (1)

3

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2
icon: UEN UEN
20

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3

Belgium NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: PSE PSE
178

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Rapport Kinnock A6-0075/2005 - am. 13 #

2005/04/12 Outcome: -: 351, +: 262, 0: 20
PL IE CZ HU SK LV EL MT SI LU IT AT CY LT ES PT EE DE BE DK GB FI SE NL FR
Total
51
12
22
20
13
9
21
4
6
6
54
17
5
10
48
22
6
89
22
13
64
14
14
25
66
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
238

Malta PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

2
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Belgium PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
4
icon: UEN UEN
20

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
28

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Italy IND/DEM

For (1)

3

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
5

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
24

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

2

Austria NI

For (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: PSE PSE
172

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Malta PSE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Rapport Kinnock A6-0075/2005 - am. 7 #

2005/04/12 Outcome: -: 506, +: 79, 0: 40
CY AT LU MT DK SI EE LV CZ FI SE IE SK LT EL BE NL PT HU IT PL ES DE FR GB
Total
4
18
6
5
12
6
6
9
21
13
15
12
13
10
18
22
25
23
21
53
51
48
87
64
63
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
22

Austria NI

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

3

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
28

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2
5
icon: UEN UEN
19

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
173

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
232

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2
4

Rapport Kinnock A6-0075/2005 - am. 8 #

2005/04/12 Outcome: -: 474, +: 126, 0: 29
AT CY LU SI EE MT DK FR LV LT FI SE BE CZ IE SK NL PT EL HU GB IT ES DE PL
Total
17
5
6
5
5
5
12
66
9
10
14
15
22
22
12
13
24
24
20
21
63
54
48
86
51
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
24

Austria NI

3

Belgium NI

For (1)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

3

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
28

Denmark IND/DEM

1

France IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
5
icon: UEN UEN
19

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2
4

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ALDE

5

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
174

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
234

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2
4

Rapport Kinnock A6-0075/2005 - am. 10 #

2005/04/12 Outcome: -: 359, +: 245, 0: 21
PL IE HU SK CZ EL SI LU MT CY LV AT LT EE IT PT ES NL BE DE DK FI SE GB FR
Total
51
11
21
13
22
21
6
6
5
5
9
18
10
6
53
24
48
25
21
86
12
14
15
61
62
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
230

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Belgium PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Italy IND/DEM

For (1)

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2
5
icon: UEN UEN
19

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
24

Slovakia NI

2

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

For (1)

3

Italy NI

For (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Spain ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: PSE PSE
178

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Rapport Kinnock A6-0075/2005 - am. 16 #

2005/04/12 Outcome: -: 346, +: 267, 0: 17
PL HU LV CZ SK LU IE SI EL MT CY AT EE ES IT NL LT PT BE DE SE FI DK GB FR
Total
51
21
9
22
13
6
12
6
21
5
5
17
6
47
54
25
10
24
21
85
15
14
12
63
66
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
232

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Belgium PPE-DE

3
4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
24

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Austria NI

For (1)

3

Italy NI

For (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
28

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
5

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

2
icon: UEN UEN
19

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Hungary ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Spain ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: PSE PSE
177

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Rapport Kinnock A6-0075/2005 - résolution #

2005/04/12 Outcome: +: 539, -: 52, 0: 19
DE ES GB FR IT PT HU CZ NL EL AT BE PL FI DK SE SK LV SI EE LT CY LU IE MT
Total
85
48
63
63
51
23
21
21
23
20
17
20
50
12
12
15
13
9
6
6
7
5
6
10
4
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
227

Belgium PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Abstain (2)

2
icon: PSE PSE
171

Czechia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
71

Spain ALDE

1
2

Sweden ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1
icon: UEN UEN
18

Italy UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3
icon: NI NI
24

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3

Italy NI

Against (1)

2

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

Against (1)

3

Belgium NI

3

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
28
5

France IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/1
date
2005-02-22T00:00:00
docs
title: PE353.488
committee
INTA
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/1
date
2005-02-07T00:00:00
docs
title: PE353.635
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-353488_EN.html
docs/2
date
2005-02-22T00:00:00
docs
title: PE353.488
committee
INTA
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/3
date
2005-04-12T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/3
date
2005-03-02T00:00:00
docs
title: PE355.494
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2005/0454/COM_SEC(2005)0454_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2005/0454/COM_SEC(2005)0454_EN.pdf
docs/5
date
2005-04-12T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/7
date
2005-04-12T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0134/COM_COM(2005)0134_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0134/COM_COM(2005)0134_EN.pdf
docs/9
date
2005-04-12T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE353.488
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0075_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0075_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0115_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0115_EN.html
docs/9/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0134/COM_COM(2005)0134_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0134/COM_COM(2005)0134_EN.pdf
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2005-03-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0075_EN.html title: A6-0075/2005
events/2
date
2005-03-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0075_EN.html title: A6-0075/2005
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050412&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20050412&type=CRE
events/5
date
2005-04-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0115_EN.html title: T6-0115/2005
summary
events/5
date
2005-04-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0115_EN.html title: T6-0115/2005
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: KINNOCK Glenys date: 2004-12-02T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2004-12-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KINNOCK Glenys group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: LUCAS Caroline date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2005-01-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LUCAS Caroline group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE353.488&secondRef=02
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE353.488
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-75&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0075_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-115
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0115_EN.html
docs/10/body
EC
docs/11/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-75&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0075_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-115
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0115_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2005-01-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2004-12-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: KINNOCK Glenys body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LUCAS Caroline
  • date: 2005-03-16T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2004-12-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: KINNOCK Glenys body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LUCAS Caroline type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2005-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-75&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0075/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2005-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3921&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050412&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-115 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0115/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2004-12-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KINNOCK Glenys group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
DEVE
date
2004-12-02T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: PSE name: KINNOCK Glenys
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2005-01-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LUCAS Caroline group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
INTA
date
2005-01-18T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: LUCAS Caroline
docs
  • date: 2004-10-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2004/1379/COM_SEC(2004)1379_EN.pdf title: SEC(2004)1379 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=1379 title: EUR-Lex summary: In September 2000, world leaders from 189 nations agreed and signed the UN Millennium Declaration, binding them to a global project to decisively reduce extreme poverty in all its key dimensions. The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) that derive from this Declaration provide an agenda for global action. This agenda and the outcomes of the World Social Summit, the World Summit on Sustainable Development, the Doha Development Agenda and the Monterrey Consensus are mutually supportive processes and essential building blocks of a worldwide partnership for sustainable development. Over the last four decades, EC development assistance has evolved from a fragmented focus on countries with which EU Member States had strong colonial or other traditional links, to a set of regional co-operation and partnership frameworks providing almost global coverage. During the 1990s, the policies and practices of EC development cooperation gradually integrated into a new global development framework aimed at poverty eradication, promotion of gender equality, access to primary education, improving health and provision of other basic services, as well as sustainable development, and the establishment of global partnerships. The EU has been a major force in this process, and has expressed on numerous occasions its full commitment to ensuring a successful conclusion. In the Council conclusions of 26 April 2004, the General Affairs Council once again confirmed that achieving the Millennium Development Goals is a key objective for the European Union. In September 2005, the UN General Assembly will take stock of the progress made by UN Members in the implementation of this global development agenda. In preparation for this event, the Commission has compiled this report on the EC contribution towards achieving MDGs. The report provides information on the extent to which the EC has focused its strategies, procedures and instruments on the implementation of the Millennium Declaration and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. It outlines how the EC contributes to progress towards the MDGs, and lists the further actions that are currently foreseen to promote the implementation of the Millennium Development Goals. The report does not address in detail the progress made in and by developing countries, which is the subject of the progress reports drafted by the countries in question. Nor does it look at the performance of EU Member States, as this will be carried out at national level in the Member State reports. The Member State reports, together with the EC report, will provide the basis for an EU synthesis report, due in early 2005. In contrast with the forthcoming synthesis report, the EC report will not propose new measures, but instead limits itself to an inventory of areas where further action may be considered. Over the coming months, the European Commission will prepare, in close dialogue with the EU Member States, proposals for an EU contribution to the MDG stocktaking event. The level of our ambition can only be high. The EU claims leadership that, in turn, requires political courage and commitment. The EU has expressed the will to make a difference. This implies that the gap between theory and practice needs to be bridged and that words are backed up with resources and action. The EU synthesis report shall give an answer to the question of how to finance the MDGs, and how funding can be channelled and used more effectively to accelerate impact. It shall look into new actions on other policy areas captured by MDG8, such as policy coherence, trade and debt sustainability. Finally, the EC shall consider using the UN 2005 Major Event platform for the launching of a major new EU initiative on Africa. type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2005-02-07T00:00:00 docs: title: PE353.635 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2005-02-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE353.488&secondRef=02 title: PE353.488 committee: INTA type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2005-03-02T00:00:00 docs: title: PE355.494 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2005-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-75&language=EN title: A6-0075/2005 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2005/0454/COM_SEC(2005)0454_EN.pdf title: SEC(2005)0454 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2005&nu_doc=454 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2005-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-115 title: T6-0115/2005 title: OJ C 033 09.02.2006, p. 0032-0311 E summary: Parliament adopted an own-initiative report by 539 votes in favour, 52 against with 19 abstentions, on the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. The report was drafted by Glenys KINNOCK (PES, UK). (Please see the summary of 16/03/05). Parliament also stressed that the target of 20 % for basic education and health should be included in the budget of the EU and the European Development Fund, expanding on the existing target of 35 % for basic social services. It also expressed its conviction that the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) and Country Strategy Papers (CSPs) could be important tools for achieving the MDGs but felt that they need to be revised to better support the MDGs. Parliament called for the ‘quick wins’ to be enshrined in PRSPs and CSPs to make them part of a sustainable and structural approach. Parliament went on to call for an increased EU contribution to the Global Health Fund, since money so far pledged for 2005 is only 1/4 of the amount needed. The EU and others must work to avoid duplication of effort and promote national ownership of HIV/AIDS, TB and malaria policies. type: Text adopted by Parliament, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0132/COM_COM(2005)0132_EN.pdf title: COM(2005)0132 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2005&nu_doc=132 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to present a communication from the Commission on the EU’s contribution to speed up progress towards the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). CONTENT: this communication takes stock of the EU’s contribution to development and identifies the measures that need to be taken to speed up achievement of the MDGs. The EU’s consolidated report on the MDGs, which was drawn up by the Commission at the request of the Member States, shows that the input of the Community and its Member States to the international community’s efforts is substantial. The EU must now do even more. The report states that in the face of major development challenges, Europe, as a global player, has special responsibilities to shoulder and must fully take on its political role in order to increase the resources for development and the effectiveness of cooperation, and to give adequate support to sub-Saharan Africa, which is behind on progress to many goals. The consolidated EU report on the MDGs and the report on the follow-up to the Barcelona commitments have highlighted the importance of the efforts made so far. This communication, together with the specific proposals on financing for development and policy coherence for development, sets out guidelines for future action. Africa , too, can change. Africa has given proof of its willingness to assume responsibility for its political and socio-economic development. A number of countries have embarked on the transition to democracy, peace is returning in many parts of the continent, and economic growth is picking up. The emergence of the African Union and the NEPAD initiative has given birth to an ambitious institutional structure and a charter that places governance and freedom at the heart of development. This year, 2005, could be Africa’s year. Europe must show that it is up to dealing with these developments and playing a leading role in supporting Africa; most importantly this includes giving Africa priority for financing, so helping to fulfil the commitments made by the G8 in 2002. Africa’s road to sustainable development and achievement of the MDGs is a long and hard one. A new dynamic must now be set in motion, the EU and Africa can and must work together to make it happen. This communication, together with the communications on financing and coherence and related reports, forms the framework of the EU’s contribution to the UN High-Level Event in September this year on the subject of development and synergies with other policies. On this basis, the Commission asks the Council to finalise the EU’s proposals and commitments with a view to speeding up progress to the Millennium Development Goals. In addition to this, the process now under way should also pave the way for a new declaration on EU development policy designed to lay down a true European Development Strategy. At the Kananaskis Summit (2002) the G8 pledged to allocate at least 50% of additional ODA to Africa. If this pledge were made at EU level and if current trends continue (keeping of Barcelona commitments for 2006), this would mean an additional allocation of more than EUR 6.5 billion a year for Africa. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2005-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0133/COM_COM(2005)0133(COR1)_EN.pdf title: COM(2005)0133 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2005&nu_doc=133 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to present a Commission communication on accelerating progress towards attaining the Millennium Development Goals – financing for development and aid effectiveness. CONTENT: the Communication outlines a way towards a possible new interim target for increased Official Development Assistance (ODA) volumes in the EU by 2010 and towards the UN target for ODA of 0.7% Gross National Income (GNI) by 2015. It suggests new aid modalities as well as a line on innovative finance sources and proposes ways to address the remaining post-Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) debt problems of low income countries. With regard to Global Public Goods it suggests redefining the EU commitment. On coordination and harmonisation the main challenge ahead lies in credible implementation of the recently agreed EU framework as well as of the results of the recent High Level Forum on aid effectiveness and concrete steps forward on complementarity in aid delivery. The commitment on reform of the International Finance System must be strengthened. The EU is well on track to deliver on most of the “Barcelona commitments”. The UN High Level Event in September 2005 will focus on how to accelerate progress towards attaining the MDGs, especially in Africa. This challenges the enlarged EU to again demonstrate its commitment to addressing the Financing for Development (FfD) challenge through reinforced EU commitments. With the proposals included in this document, the Commission intends to initiate a discussion with a view to establishing a new set of commitments and to reach an agreement on “Barcelona II”-type commitments. Whereas this Communication focuses on the tools for improved FfD, the Communication on Policy Coherence proposes other policy measures that could be undertaken to support the achievement of the MDGs. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2005-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0134/COM_COM(2005)0134_EN.pdf title: COM(2005)0134 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2005&nu_doc=134 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to present a Commission communication on accelerating progress towards attaining the Millennium Development Goals – policy coherence for development. CONTENT: this Communication presents the Commission proposals on the subject of policy coherence. These are set out as follows: Trade: t he EU is strongly committed to ensuring a development-friendly and sustainable outcome of the Doha Development Agenda and EU-ACP Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs). The EU will further improve its Generalised System of Preferences, with a view to effectively enhancing developing countries’ exports to the EU. The EU will continue to work towards integrating trade into development strategies and will assist developing countries in carrying out domestic reforms where necessary. Environment: t he EU will lead global efforts to curb unsustainable consumption and production patterns. The EU will assist developing countries in implementing the Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs), and will work to ensure that the capacities of developing countries are taken into account during MEA negotiations. The EU will continue to promote pro-poor environment-related initiatives and policies. Security: t he EU will treat security and development as complementary agendas, with the common aim of creating a secure environment and of breaking the vicious circle of poverty, war, environmental degradation and failing economic, social and political structures. The EU will enhance its policies in support of good and effective governance and the prevention of state fragility and conflict, including by strengthening its response to difficult partnerships/failing states. The EU will strengthen the control of its arms exports, with the aim of avoiding that EU-manufactured weaponry be used against civilian populations or aggravate existing tensions or conflicts in developing countries. The EU will promote cooperation in fighting corruption, organised crime and terrorism. Agriculture: t he EU will continue its efforts to minimise the level of trade distortion related to its support measures to the agricultural sector, and to facilitate developing countries’ agricultural development. Fisheries: t he EC will continue to pay particular attention to the development objectives of the countries with which the Community will engage into bilateral fisheries agreements. Within the context of the new EC policy on fisheries partnership agreements with third countries which is being implemented since 2003, the EC will continue to encourage the conclusion of fisheries agreements in order to contribute towards rational and sustainable exploitation of the surplus of coastal States’ marine resources to the mutual benefit of both parties. Social dimension of globalisation, employment and decent work: t he EU will contribute to strengthening the Social Dimension of Globalisation with a view to ensure maximum benefits for all, both men and women. The EU will promote employment and decent work for all as a global goal. Migration: the EU will promote the synergies between migration and development, to make migration a positive factor for development. Research and innovation: t he EU will promote the integration of development objectives, where appropriate, into its RTD and Innovation policies, and will continue to assist developing countries in enhancing their domestic capacities in this area. Information society: t he EU will address the digital divide by exploiting the potential of Information and Communication Technologies as a development tool and as a significant resource for attaining the MDGs. Transport: t he EU will address the special needs of both land-locked and coastal developing countries by promoting the intermodality issues for achieving network interconnectivity as well as security and safety issues. Energy: t he EU is strongly committed to contribute to the special needs of developing countries by promoting access to sustainable energy sources and by supporting establishing interconnection of energy infrastructures and networks. To a considerable extent the above coherence commitments already steer EU policies. A lot of action has already been undertaken, and many new actions have already been planned. What provides the raison d’etre for this Communication is that these commitments and actions are assessed within the framework of global efforts to achieve the MDGs. By recognizing that these policy objectives should be considered as Coherence for Development Commitments in the context of the MDGs, the EU reconfirms and strengthens its engagement to effectively deliver on these orientations, against the background of the given MDG timeframe between now and 2015. Lastly, to further enhance EU policy coherence in the specific context of supporting the MDGs, the Commission will compile a mid-term EU Policy Coherence for Development Report, between now and the next international MDG Review, where progress on the coherence commitments proposed in this Communication will be reviewed. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2005-05-19T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=3921&j=0&l=en title: SP(2005)2124 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2005-07-22T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=3921&j=1&l=en title: SP(2005)2323 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2005-01-13T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-03-16T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report by Glenys KINNOCK ( PES , UK ) on the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The committee emphasised that poverty reduction through the achievement of the MDGs and the Millennium Declaration must be recognised unambiguously as the overarching framework for EU development policy and that this must be reflected clearly in all relevant policy and legislative proposals. However, it believed that the MDGs should not be seen as a technical matter which could be resolved simply by providing more money without identifying and tackling the underlying causes of poverty. MEPs commended those Member States that had reached or passed 0.7% GNI, whilst noting the worrying trend set by some to begin a process of decreasing aid levels, as well as abandoning previous commitments on timetables. The committee stressed that, although the EU seemed currently on target for its intermediary objective of 0.39% of GNI for Official Development Assistance (ODA) in 2006, there were large disparities in the performance of its Member States. It therefore called on those Members States still lagging behind to commit themselves to a clear timetable and deadlines for reaching the 0.7% target before 2015. Lastly, the report said that it was an illusion to achieve the MDG of halving poverty and hunger by 2015, providing free education for all and improving access to health care while developing countries spend four times more on repaying debts than they spend on basic social services.
  • date: 2005-03-23T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-75&language=EN title: A6-0075/2005
  • date: 2005-04-12T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3921&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2005-04-12T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050412&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-04-12T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-115 title: T6-0115/2005 summary: Parliament adopted an own-initiative report by 539 votes in favour, 52 against with 19 abstentions, on the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. The report was drafted by Glenys KINNOCK (PES, UK). (Please see the summary of 16/03/05). Parliament also stressed that the target of 20 % for basic education and health should be included in the budget of the EU and the European Development Fund, expanding on the existing target of 35 % for basic social services. It also expressed its conviction that the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) and Country Strategy Papers (CSPs) could be important tools for achieving the MDGs but felt that they need to be revised to better support the MDGs. Parliament called for the ‘quick wins’ to be enshrined in PRSPs and CSPs to make them part of a sustainable and structural approach. Parliament went on to call for an increased EU contribution to the Global Health Fund, since money so far pledged for 2005 is only 1/4 of the amount needed. The EU and others must work to avoid duplication of effort and promote national ownership of HIV/AIDS, TB and malaria policies.
  • date: 2005-04-12T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    DEVE/6/23620
    New
    • DEVE/6/23620
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 52
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6.30 Development cooperation
    New
    6.30
    Development cooperation
    activities
    • date: 2005-01-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2004-12-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: KINNOCK Glenys body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LUCAS Caroline
    • date: 2005-03-16T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2004-12-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: KINNOCK Glenys body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LUCAS Caroline type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 2005-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-75&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0075/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • date: 2005-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3921&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050412&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-115 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0115/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2004-12-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: KINNOCK Glenys
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LUCAS Caroline
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      DEVE/6/23620
      reference
      2004/2252(INI)
      title
      The role of the European Union in the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals MDGs
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      6.30 Development cooperation