BETA


2004/2254(INI) Relocation in the context of regional development

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead REGI HUTCHINSON Alain (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2006/06/30
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/04/19
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/03/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2006/03/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Alain HUTCHINSON (PES, BE). It pointed out that companies choose to relocate their activities for manifold reasons, some of which are not connected to issues of productivity, efficiency or economic viability. Such relocation is liable, however, to result in major job losses and economic hardships whose impact on regional development will be all the more pronounced where there are few employment possibilities in the region abandoned. Company relocation is a serious concern in several Member States. Parliament called for practices that are not conducive to the achievement of cohesion and full employment, such as relocation that is not justified from the point of view of economic viability or that is liable to lead to substantial job losses, not to be supported financially by the EU. It recommended that the Commission keep current company closures and relocations under review and that it demand that aid granted be paid back if it is misused.

Parliament acknowledged the Commission's proposal, within the framework of the reform of the Structural Funds, to penalise companies which, having received EU aid, relocate their activities within seven years of the grant of aid. It called also for companies that have received public aid - in particular where they have failed to comply with all of the obligations connected with that aid - or laid off the staff at their original location, without complying with national or international law, and have then relocated within the EU, to be blocked from receiving public aid in their new location, and also blocked from receiving Structural Funds or State aid for a period of seven years following relocation. Measures should also be contemplated with regard to 'reverse' relocations, namely those which, without relocation of the company's activities, lead to deterioration in working conditions. Parliament welcomed the fact that the Commission had taken measures adapting the new guidelines on national regional aid with a view to repayment of aid granted to companies which fail to comply with the conditions attaching to the aid and which relocate their plants within or, especially, outside the EU.

Parliament called for the rapid establishment of a European strategy for managing and monitoring the relocation of companies, implemented at Union level and coordinated with all the Member States. It asked that the Commission entrust the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (European Monitoring Centre on Change) with the remit of studying, assessing (including establishing the number of jobs created and lost, while taking into account their quality) and monitoring the issue of relocation.

It also called for on the Commission for the following:

- the implementation of existing provisions with regard to reimbursement of subsidies by companies which fail to respect their obligations with regard to investment for which they have received public subsidy;

- listing companies which infringe rules on State aid or Community funds by proceeding to relocate their activity within or out of the EU without having fulfilled the requirement on perenniality contained in the rules concerned;

- a European Code of Conduct to prevent transfers of companies or their production units to another EU region or country for the sole purpose of obtaining European financial aid;

- the inclusion of social clauses in international treaties, and to do so on the basis of the five International Labour Organization (ILO) conventions considered to be priorities;

- the targeted use of the European funds, which should be focussed on vocational training and the retraining of workers in regions affected by restructuring or relocation and, in particular, of those workers who have been affected by a job loss as a result of the relocation of their former employer;

- provisions designed to penalise more severely companies which, after having received public subsidies, relocate all or part of their activity outside the European Union;

Parliament supported the Commission's proposal to create a globalisation fund to stave off the economic and social impacts of restructuring and relocation, and called for that fund to be allocated sufficient funding to cover the roles assigned to it. The use of Community funds should be made subject to specific rules relating to innovation, local development, employment, and to production commitments within the territory of the undertakings benefiting from these funds.

Documents
2006/03/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/03/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2006/01/30
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2006/01/30
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2006/01/24
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Alain HUTCHINSON (PES, BE) on relocation in the context of regional development. MEPs stressed the need to ensure consistency between regional development policy and competition policy, and added that public aid should not provide a spur to the relocation of economic activity. They wanted to see a Community-wide regulatory legal framework, with monitoring systems to quantify the economic and social cost of any relocation. In this context they called for the European Foundation on the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, based in Dublin , to carry out studies into the impact of the relocation of companies, assessing the number of jobs created and lost, while taking into account their quality.

The report said that practices that are not conducive to the achievement of economic cohesion and the strategic goal of full employment, such as unjustified relocation likely to cause job losses, should not be financially supported by the EU. The Commission was urged to take measures adapting the new guidelines on national regional aid with a view to repayment of the aid granted to companies which relocate their plants within or, in particular, outside the EU. MEPs also suggested that the guidelines should allow the granting of public aid, as an emergency measure, in the event of major job losses even though the region concerned would not normally qualify for such aid.

The committee backed the Commission's idea, as part of the reform of the Structural Funds, of penalising companies which, having received EU aid, relocate their activity within seven years of the granting of the aid. It also urged the Commission and the Member States to name and shame companies which infringe rules on state aids or Community funds as a result of relocation. MEPs suggested that the Commission draw up a European code of conduct to prevent transfers of companies or their production units to another EU region or country for the sole purpose of obtaining European financial aid.

Lastly, the report called on the Commission and the Member States to monitor the effective and targeted use of European funds, which should be focused on vocational training and the retraining of workers in regions affected by restructuring or relocation and, in particular, of those workers who have been directly affected by a job loss as a result of the relocation of their former employer.

2005/12/20
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2005/10/26
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2005/06/20
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2005/01/19
   EP - HUTCHINSON Alain (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2005/01/13
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Hutchinson A6-0013/2006 - am. 26 #

2006/03/14 Outcome: -: 526, +: 106, 0: 6
CY IE LU SE EE MT LV SI DK CZ FI SK PT AT LT EL IT NL BE HU FR ES PL DE GB
Total
6
12
5
17
5
5
8
7
13
20
14
11
19
18
12
23
47
26
23
20
72
46
50
92
67
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: UEN UEN
26

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
26

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
30

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
74

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1
3

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1
2
icon: PSE PSE
179

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Slovakia PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
226

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Sweden PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport Hutchinson A6-0013/2006 - am. 27 #

2006/03/14 Outcome: -: 525, +: 71, 0: 41
CY LU SI EE MT DK LV FI SE SK CZ IE LT EL AT PT BE IT NL HU FR ES PL DE GB
Total
6
5
5
5
5
10
7
13
18
11
21
11
12
23
18
20
23
51
24
20
72
46
51
88
72
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

4
icon: NI NI
26

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3
icon: UEN UEN
26

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
30

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
75

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1
2
icon: PSE PSE
177

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Slovakia PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
229

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport Hutchinson A6-0013/2006 - am. 29 #

2006/03/14 Outcome: -: 537, +: 64, 0: 49
CY LU EE MT LV SI DK FI SK CZ LT IE EL SE AT PT IT BE NL HU FR ES PL GB DE
Total
6
5
5
5
8
7
13
14
11
21
12
12
23
18
18
20
51
23
26
20
72
47
51
71
91
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: NI NI
26

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3
icon: UEN UEN
26

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
31

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
75

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1
2
icon: PSE PSE
179

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Slovakia PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
236

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport Hutchinson A6-0013/2006 - am. 17 #

2006/03/14 Outcome: -: 444, +: 205, 0: 5
CZ LT PL LV GB DK SE CY EE FI SI MT LU BE IE NL SK AT EL PT HU IT FR ES DE
Total
21
12
51
8
72
12
18
6
5
14
7
5
5
23
12
26
12
18
23
20
20
52
73
47
92
icon: ALDE ALDE
75

Latvia ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
28

Czechia NI

1

United Kingdom NI

3

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Austria NI

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
31

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

3
icon: UEN UEN
26

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2
icon: PSE PSE
180

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Estonia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
237

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Rapport Hutchinson A6-0013/2006 - am. 19 #

2006/03/14 Outcome: -: 590, +: 44, 0: 18
LV EE MT LU CY PL SI DK SK LT SE IE FI AT CZ BE HU PT EL NL IT ES FR GB DE
Total
7
5
5
5
6
51
7
13
12
12
18
12
12
18
21
23
20
20
23
26
50
47
73
71
95
icon: NI NI
27

Slovakia NI

3

Austria NI

2

Czechia NI

1

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
31

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2
icon: UEN UEN
25

Latvia UEN

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: ALDE ALDE
75

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1
2
icon: PSE PSE
182

Estonia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
234

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Finland PPE-DE

2

Rapport Hutchinson A6-0013/2006 - am. 30 #

2006/03/14 Outcome: -: 540, +: 90, 0: 12
CY LU LV EE MT SE SI DK FI SK CZ AT LT IE PT BE EL NL HU IT ES FR PL DE GB
Total
6
5
6
5
5
18
6
13
12
12
21
18
12
12
19
19
23
26
20
50
45
72
51
93
73
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
31

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
25

Slovakia NI

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3
icon: UEN UEN
24

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
74

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Sweden ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Italy ALDE

4
2
icon: PSE PSE
178

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

France PSE

Against (28)<