BETA


2004/2257(INI) The role of "Euroregions" in the development of regional policy

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead REGI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2005/12/15
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2005/12/01
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2005/12/01
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Kyriacos TRIANTAPHYLLIDES (GUE/NGL, CY) on the role of "Euroregions" in the development of regional policy. (Please see the document dated 06/10/2005.) Parliament felt that cross-border cooperation was of fundamental importance to European cohesion and integration and must therefore be given wide support. It called on Member States to promote the use of Euroregions as one of the tools of cross-border co-operation. A Euroregion or similar structure fulfils important cross-border tasks, providing, for example:

- an information and service point for citizens, institutions and regional and local authorities;

- a focal point for common values, aims and strategies;

- a driving force for solving cross-border problems;

- a mouthpiece in all cross-border questions.

Euroregions are a turn table for all cross-border relationships, contacts, knowledge transfers and operational programmes and projects and they need certain legal status to be able to perform their tasks. Cross-border cooperation also makes a considerable contribution to the implementation of the Lisbon strategy through joint innovation and research, R&D networks across borders and the exchange of best practice. Parliament felt that it was particularly important that the microproject form of assistance, as provided for in the Commission's Communication INTERREG III, be maintained under the Structural Funds.

Parliament went on to underline the need to give priority to eliminating disparities between regions in the new Member States and in the old Member States, as well as the need to extend the concept of Euroregions and similar structures, even though they do not necessarily have the legal competencies to include multiple facets of co-operation. Possible fields of mutual interest could include promoting culture, education, tourism and economic issues as well as, where applicable, fighting organised crime, drug trafficking and fraud in partnership with relevant national institutions.

Parliament called for Euroregions and similar structures as proposed in the legal framework of the EGCC to be enabled to develop and manage cross-border programmes in the EU as well as programmes in line with the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument and the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance as from the year 2007 onwards in partnership with national institutions.

Finally, it stressed the need to support cross-border co-operation and the establishment of Euroregions, including regions in the sensitive area of the Middle East, in an effort to promote friendly relations, stability, security and economic interests in terms of mutual respect and benefit.

Documents
2005/12/01
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2005/10/19
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2005/10/19
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2005/10/06
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report by Kyriacos TRIANTAPHYLLIDES (GUE/NGL, CY) on the role of "Euroregions" in the development of regional policy. It began by pointing out that EU enlargement had resulted in greater disparities between European regions, which needed to be addressed by means of an effective cohesion policy. One way of achieving this was through the development of cross-border cooperation, which provided a suitable approach to solving daily problems on both sides of the border, especially in the economic, social, cultural and environmental fields. Such cooperation could also contribute to the implementation of the Lisbon strategy, through joint innovation and research, R&D networks across borders and the exchange of best practice and experience.

The report noted that Euroregions (as proposed in the framework of the European grouping of cross-border cooperation - EGCC) were a "turntable" for all cross-border relationships, contacts, knowledge transfers, operational programmes and projects. They should be promoted as one of the tools of cross-border cooperation and be given "certain legal status" in order to be able to perform their tasks. The concept of Euroregions and similar structures should be extended, for example to include cooperation in promoting culture, education, tourism and economic issues as well as, where applicable, fighting organised crime, drug trafficking and fraud in partnership with relevant national institutions. They should also be enabled to devise, implement and manage cross-border programmes in the EU as well as programmes under the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument and the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance from 2007 onwards.

MEPs stressed the importance of Euroregions for Member States with natural handicaps, including small island states. Lastly, they called for support for cross-border cooperation and the establishment of Euroregions involving regions from the sensitive area of the Middle East , in a bid to promote friendly relations, stability, security and economic interests of mutual benefit.

2005/08/05
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2005/01/13
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2005-08-05T00:00:00
docs
title: PE360.353
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/0
date
2005-06-22T00:00:00
docs
title: PE360.073
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AM-360353_EN.html
docs/1
date
2005-08-05T00:00:00
docs
title: PE360.353
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/2
date
2005-12-15T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2005)5015
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/2/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4336&j=0&l=en
docs/3
date
2005-12-15T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2005)5015
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
committees/0/rapporteur
  • name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos date: 2005-01-19T00:00:00 group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0311_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0311_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4336&j=0&l=en
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2005-10-19T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0311_EN.html title: A6-0311/2005
events/2
date
2005-10-19T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0311_EN.html title: A6-0311/2005
events/4
date
2005-12-01T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0448_EN.html title: T6-0448/2005
summary
events/4
date
2005-12-01T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0448_EN.html title: T6-0448/2005
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
rapporteur
name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos date: 2005-01-19T00:00:00 group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2005-01-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-311&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0311_EN.html
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-311&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0311_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-448
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0448_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2005-01-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2005-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos
  • date: 2005-10-06T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2005-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2005-10-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-311&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0311/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2005-12-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4336&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-448 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0448/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2005-01-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
REGI
date
2005-01-19T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos
docs
  • date: 2005-06-22T00:00:00 docs: title: PE360.073 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2005-08-05T00:00:00 docs: title: PE360.353 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2005-10-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-311&language=EN title: A6-0311/2005 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-12-15T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4336&j=0&l=en title: SP(2005)5015 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2005-01-13T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-10-06T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report by Kyriacos TRIANTAPHYLLIDES (GUE/NGL, CY) on the role of "Euroregions" in the development of regional policy. It began by pointing out that EU enlargement had resulted in greater disparities between European regions, which needed to be addressed by means of an effective cohesion policy. One way of achieving this was through the development of cross-border cooperation, which provided a suitable approach to solving daily problems on both sides of the border, especially in the economic, social, cultural and environmental fields. Such cooperation could also contribute to the implementation of the Lisbon strategy, through joint innovation and research, R&D networks across borders and the exchange of best practice and experience. The report noted that Euroregions (as proposed in the framework of the European grouping of cross-border cooperation - EGCC) were a "turntable" for all cross-border relationships, contacts, knowledge transfers, operational programmes and projects. They should be promoted as one of the tools of cross-border cooperation and be given "certain legal status" in order to be able to perform their tasks. The concept of Euroregions and similar structures should be extended, for example to include cooperation in promoting culture, education, tourism and economic issues as well as, where applicable, fighting organised crime, drug trafficking and fraud in partnership with relevant national institutions. They should also be enabled to devise, implement and manage cross-border programmes in the EU as well as programmes under the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument and the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance from 2007 onwards. MEPs stressed the importance of Euroregions for Member States with natural handicaps, including small island states. Lastly, they called for support for cross-border cooperation and the establishment of Euroregions involving regions from the sensitive area of the Middle East , in a bid to promote friendly relations, stability, security and economic interests of mutual benefit.
  • date: 2005-10-19T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-311&language=EN title: A6-0311/2005
  • date: 2005-12-01T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4336&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2005-12-01T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-448 title: T6-0448/2005 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Kyriacos TRIANTAPHYLLIDES (GUE/NGL, CY) on the role of "Euroregions" in the development of regional policy. (Please see the document dated 06/10/2005.) Parliament felt that cross-border cooperation was of fundamental importance to European cohesion and integration and must therefore be given wide support. It called on Member States to promote the use of Euroregions as one of the tools of cross-border co-operation. A Euroregion or similar structure fulfils important cross-border tasks, providing, for example: - an information and service point for citizens, institutions and regional and local authorities; - a focal point for common values, aims and strategies; - a driving force for solving cross-border problems; - a mouthpiece in all cross-border questions. Euroregions are a turn table for all cross-border relationships, contacts, knowledge transfers and operational programmes and projects and they need certain legal status to be able to perform their tasks. Cross-border cooperation also makes a considerable contribution to the implementation of the Lisbon strategy through joint innovation and research, R&D networks across borders and the exchange of best practice. Parliament felt that it was particularly important that the microproject form of assistance, as provided for in the Commission's Communication INTERREG III, be maintained under the Structural Funds. Parliament went on to underline the need to give priority to eliminating disparities between regions in the new Member States and in the old Member States, as well as the need to extend the concept of Euroregions and similar structures, even though they do not necessarily have the legal competencies to include multiple facets of co-operation. Possible fields of mutual interest could include promoting culture, education, tourism and economic issues as well as, where applicable, fighting organised crime, drug trafficking and fraud in partnership with relevant national institutions. Parliament called for Euroregions and similar structures as proposed in the legal framework of the EGCC to be enabled to develop and manage cross-border programmes in the EU as well as programmes in line with the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument and the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance as from the year 2007 onwards in partnership with national institutions. Finally, it stressed the need to support cross-border co-operation and the establishment of Euroregions, including regions in the sensitive area of the Middle East, in an effort to promote friendly relations, stability, security and economic interests in terms of mutual respect and benefit.
  • date: 2005-12-01T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    REGI/6/25237
    New
    • REGI/6/25237
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 052
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 4.70 Regional policy
    New
    4.70
    Regional policy
    activities
    • date: 2005-01-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2005-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos
    • date: 2005-10-06T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2005-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 2005-10-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-311&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0311/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • date: 2005-12-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4336&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-448 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0448/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2005-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      REGI/6/25237
      reference
      2004/2257(INI)
      title
      The role of "Euroregions" in the development of regional policy
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      4.70 Regional policy