BETA


2004/2563(RSP) Resolution on the Commission's legislative and work programme for 2005

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:
RoP 38

Events

2005/12/21
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

In 2000, the European Commission launched a far reaching administrative reform initiative, the purpose of which was to reform and overhaul its working methods, financial management systems and personnel policy. Four “pillars” of reform were established. Firstly, creating a culture of service and efficiency. Secondly, examining strategic planning and programming. Thirdly, reviewing its personnel policy. Fourthly, reforming its auditing, financial management and control policies. Five key principles governed these measures namely, independence, responsibility, accountability, efficiency and transparency.

This report, which covers the period from February 2004 to the present, responds to a specific request from the European Parliament, on the Commission’s legislative work programme 2005, and for an account of the reform process launched in 2000. In preparing this report, the Commission has taken stock of progress thus far. Additionally, it has prepared an account of future developments in the field of strategic planning, financial and human resource management and new working methods. In summary, the report makes the following findings:

Creating a culture of service and efficiency: Reform has brought significant improvements to transparency within the Commission and has led to an efficiency drive in how it responds to public requests. A “Code of good administrative behaviour” has led to a set of rules which seek to offer the public an open and transparent service. A record number of people are seeking access to Commission documents – as witnessed by a 70% increase in requests between 2003-2004. The Commission has also strived to implement improvement to European governance, through measures such as the 2002 Action Plan on Better Regulation. In September 2005, the Commission presented the results of a screening programme under which the Commission announced it was withdrawing 68 pieces of pending legislation. In other areas the Commission has simplified its working methods and procedures in order to improve and help co-ordinate its internal workings. To guarantee that resources are spent as effectively as possible, the Commission is increasingly externalising a lot of its implementation of certain programmes to executive agencies.

Strategic planning and programming: The Commission’s “Strategic Planning and Programming Cycle” (SPP) requires managers to prepare policies by setting high-level objectives, which in turn feed through into resource allocation and operation planning. This is followed by a monitoring phase as well as ex-post reporting. ABM instruments are integrated into the Commission’s working methods and used for the purpose of communicating with the other EU institutions. Further, when presenting the Commission’s work programme for 2005, the Commission President Barroso expressed his wish to work even more closely with the other institutions to deliver common objectives. This was later boosted by the Framework Agreement between the Council and the European Parliament, in which regular bi-lateral dialogue at the highest level was stressed. Commission President Barroso has also placed a new emphasis on communication, listening to the citizens and working for and with them.

- Personnel policy : New staff regulations were adopted in March 2004. These were complemented by implementing rules relating to personal liability, professional incompetence and contracts relating to contract and temporary staff. The gradual phasing out of auxiliary staff began in 2004 and in June 2005 EPSO launched a competition for contract staff to set up its data base. In 2005 the third full exercise of the new staff appraisal system was completed. Training has played a significant role in the Commission’s human resources policy, with the average number of training days per official in 2004 being 9.1. In addition, the Commission adopted the “Fourth Action Programme for Equal Opportunities for Women and Men at the Commission.”

Audit, financial management and control: The 2004 Annual Activity Reports (AAR’s) drew a globally satisfactory picture of the management and control situation. In the same year preparations were undertaken for the transition to accrual accounting by 1 January 2005. The Internal Audit Service (IAS) concluded a series of in-depth audits throughout 2004 with the result that the IAS and IAC’s now apply common minimum standards for audit reporting and in particular on the rating of audit observations/recommendations.

To conclude, the internal reforms undertaken by the Commission in 2000 amounted to a major modernisation exercise involving an overhaul of its working methods, procedures and regulations. This achievement was made possible through the efforts of its internal staff. Now that the reform process per se has been concluded, the Commission is determined to build upon its achievements and to ensure that its resources, both financial and human, are used to best effect. The Commission remains committed to delivering strategic objectives and to focusing attention on the formulation of effective policies. To achieve these ends, the Commission proposes to continue the process of consolidation and simplification of internal procedures, to enshrine a policy of continual learning, to build upon its successes in the field of accountability and transparency and lastly to enhance its management culture based on a policy of responsibility and improved external communication.

2005/02/24
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects
Details

By 264 votes in favour to 201 against with 37 abstentions, the European Parliament has adopted a resolution on the Commission's legislative and work programme for 2005.

This comprehensive overview included the following points, amongst others:

- A more competitive and cohesive European Parliament : the Parliament welcomes the central importance attached to implementing the Lisbon Strategy and support attempts to target fewer and more complementary objectives. They invite the Commission to review the EU's Sustainable Development Strategy alongside the Lisbon Strategy. They also stress the importance of action at Member State and regional level as well as by the EU and call for rigorous impact assessment of all new initiatives.

Parliament calls for further action to complete the single market, notably in energy, transport, telecommunications and financial and other services. It invites the Commission to review its proposal for a software patents directive (in line with the decisions already taken by the Legal Affairs Committee and the Conference of Presidents). On financial services, Parliament support approval of measures already in the pipeline, but ask the Commission to avoid bringing forward new proposals unless they are duly justified and assessed. They applaud steps to improve the business environment, including entrepreneurship and good corporate governance, while stressing the importance of consistency in the contract law area. Parliament welcomes the high priority given to strengthening the EU's research and development effort.

MEPs state their belief that a strong competition policy and the effective enforcement of its rules are extremely important in improving competitiveness. They welcome the Commission's plans to promote competitive practices in a number of sectors, while supported the aim of ensuring less, better focussed state aid - though there should be no discrimination between the Members States on this matter.

Parliament call for the essential structure of the Stability and Growth Pact to be safeguarded in any proposed reform, in particular regarding the three per cent deficit rule, but also with more attention to be paid to the public debt position of the Member States. Cohesion policy, they assert, is important in its own right, but also as a method for achieving the Lisbon objectives. They support the Commission's efforts to persuade Member States that the Trans-European Network projects should be planned and financed on the basis of support both from the EU budget and, where possible, through public-private partnerships.

- Improving Europe's quality of life : Parliament says the effective implementation of the EU Biodiversity Plan will require appropriate financial resources, including for the Natura 2000 network. They call for the Commission and Parliament to work together to find a balanced solution on the REACH proposals. They also say it is time to update the rules on animal health and welfare in the light of new scientific developments. They call for the use of renewable and innovative energy solutions to reduce dependence on fossil fuels.

Parliament welcomes the ongoing reform of the Common Agricultural Policy, but is concerned that this should not lead to distortions of competition among farmers in the Member States, while opposing renationalisation. On the other hand, MEPs regret the lack of proposals on the Common Fisheries Policy, given the large number of outstanding issues for the fundamentally important fisheries sector.

Parliament looks forward to concrete guidelines for the manifold challenges linked to an ageing population, especially proposals to provide the highest possible quality of life for the elderly, while ensuring sustainable pensions and health systems. They call on the Commission to work with Member States to increase the labour market participation of people over the age of 55, and call for a stronger emphasis on a 'child-friendly' working environment. They repeat that a strong and vibrant social dimension is an important component of a successful and dynamic economy. Parliament also calls for adequate EU funding for education, culture, youth and media programmes, and looks forward to the Commission communication on youth policy. It also wants to see detailed proposals on how to tackle the gender pay-gap in coming years.

- A safer Europe for the citizen : Parliament stresses the need to seek an appropriate balance between increased security for citizens and proper protection for their fundamental rights. This requires a proper evaluation of measures already adopted. The fight against terrorism and organised crime is critical to building a safer Europe, and the Commission should urgently work on clearer definitions of certain cross-border crimes. Parliament welcomes the common approach to border control, asylum and immigration, including better external border security and agreements with third countries. They call for national governments to forewarn other Member States before taking significant unilateral steps in this area. They also call for the creation of a proper EU legal base for Europol.

Parliament wants the new European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control to be up and running as soon as possible, and stresses the need for early warning and immediate response mechanisms for natural disasters and health crises. It calls for intensified research into HIV/AIDS medication.

On consumer protection, the need for simplification of the rules on cross-border contracts is stressed, while opposing the merging of consumer policy and public health programmes.

- A stronger Europe in a safer world : Parliament calls for the steady and determined development of the EU's common foreign, security and defence policies to help project European values on the world stage. It wants to see rapid agreement on the setting up of the joint external action service, in a way which protects the prerogatives of both the Commission and Parliament.

A high priority on implementing a comprehensive neighbourhood policy is requested, while developing a strong new Eastern dimension and a strengthening and deepening of the Euro-Mediterranean dialogue. MEPs also ask for every possible effort to be made to achieve the reunification of Cyprus.

Parliament calls again or a strengthening of EU-US relations, including a genuine Transatlantic Partnership agreement, with commitments to remove the remaining trade barriers by 2015. MEPs oppose any lifting of the embargo on arms sales to China. They also call for clear and balanced EU input into the process of finding a lasting peace between Israel and a viable, democratic Palestinian state. They welcome the EU's positive role in the reconstruction of Iraq and in efforts to prevent Iran form acquiring military nuclear capability.

Parliament is gravely concerned that none of the eight Millennium Development Goals for sub-Saharan Africa have been met or are on track to be met by 2015. It says the international community must dramatically increase both the quality and quantity of its development assistance.

The Commission's aim to build a strong coalition for further post-Kyoto action on climate change is encouraged, while also encouraging the USA to bring forward its own proposals in this field. They also underline the importance of a multilateral approach to trade policy and a successful conclusion of the Doha Development Agenda. They stress the importance of progressively removing import barriers on goods from developing countries and progressively eliminating all forms of EU export subsidy on agricultural products.

- A Europe that works better - closer to the citizen : the House welcomes the Commission's commitment to applying an impact assessment process for all legislative measures of substance. They invite the Commission to develop a more ambitious approach for guaranteeing Member States comply with their obligations to implement EU directives. They also want a considerably more ambitious approach to the simplification of existing legislation.

Parliament stresses the paramount importance of making Europe work better and bringing it closer to the citizens, and that therefore the EU institutions should work together to help ensure the ratification of the Constitution.

Lastly, Parliament welcomes the Commission's emphasis on value for money and accountability as well as the suggestion of a roadmap aimed at securing a positive statement of assurance from the Court of Auditors. They again call for reforms to the EU Financial Regulation to remove all obstacles to proper implementation. They ask the Commission to create a secure and comprehensive internal control environment for the EU budget to address the problems arising from 'shared management' and to take a much tougher approach with decentralised paying agencies. Parliament emphasises the importance of including 'fraud-proofing' measures in all relevant legislative texts and expect the revision of the OLAF regulation to enhance that body's independent status. It urges the Commission to adopt a pro-active approach to encourage whistle-blowers to come forward, while stressing that the complete and successful implementation of the new accounting system is a priority for the year ahead.

2005/02/24
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2005/02/24
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

By 264 votes in favour to 201 against with 37 abstentions, the European Parliament has adopted a resolution on the Commission's legislative and work programme for 2005.

This comprehensive overview included the following points, amongst others:

- A more competitive and cohesive European Parliament : the Parliament welcomes the central importance attached to implementing the Lisbon Strategy and support attempts to target fewer and more complementary objectives. They invite the Commission to review the EU's Sustainable Development Strategy alongside the Lisbon Strategy. They also stress the importance of action at Member State and regional level as well as by the EU and call for rigorous impact assessment of all new initiatives.

Parliament calls for further action to complete the single market, notably in energy, transport, telecommunications and financial and other services. It invites the Commission to review its proposal for a software patents directive (in line with the decisions already taken by the Legal Affairs Committee and the Conference of Presidents). On financial services, Parliament support approval of measures already in the pipeline, but ask the Commission to avoid bringing forward new proposals unless they are duly justified and assessed. They applaud steps to improve the business environment, including entrepreneurship and good corporate governance, while stressing the importance of consistency in the contract law area. Parliament welcomes the high priority given to strengthening the EU's research and development effort.

MEPs state their belief that a strong competition policy and the effective enforcement of its rules are extremely important in improving competitiveness. They welcome the Commission's plans to promote competitive practices in a number of sectors, while supported the aim of ensuring less, better focussed state aid - though there should be no discrimination between the Members States on this matter.

Parliament call for the essential structure of the Stability and Growth Pact to be safeguarded in any proposed reform, in particular regarding the three per cent deficit rule, but also with more attention to be paid to the public debt position of the Member States. Cohesion policy, they assert, is important in its own right, but also as a method for achieving the Lisbon objectives. They support the Commission's efforts to persuade Member States that the Trans-European Network projects should be planned and financed on the basis of support both from the EU budget and, where possible, through public-private partnerships.

- Improving Europe's quality of life : Parliament says the effective implementation of the EU Biodiversity Plan will require appropriate financial resources, including for the Natura 2000 network. They call for the Commission and Parliament to work together to find a balanced solution on the REACH proposals. They also say it is time to update the rules on animal health and welfare in the light of new scientific developments. They call for the use of renewable and innovative energy solutions to reduce dependence on fossil fuels.

Parliament welcomes the ongoing reform of the Common Agricultural Policy, but is concerned that this should not lead to distortions of competition among farmers in the Member States, while opposing renationalisation. On the other hand, MEPs regret the lack of proposals on the Common Fisheries Policy, given the large number of outstanding issues for the fundamentally important fisheries sector.

Parliament looks forward to concrete guidelines for the manifold challenges linked to an ageing population, especially proposals to provide the highest possible quality of life for the elderly, while ensuring sustainable pensions and health systems. They call on the Commission to work with Member States to increase the labour market participation of people over the age of 55, and call for a stronger emphasis on a 'child-friendly' working environment. They repeat that a strong and vibrant social dimension is an important component of a successful and dynamic economy. Parliament also calls for adequate EU funding for education, culture, youth and media programmes, and looks forward to the Commission communication on youth policy. It also wants to see detailed proposals on how to tackle the gender pay-gap in coming years.

- A safer Europe for the citizen : Parliament stresses the need to seek an appropriate balance between increased security for citizens and proper protection for their fundamental rights. This requires a proper evaluation of measures already adopted. The fight against terrorism and organised crime is critical to building a safer Europe, and the Commission should urgently work on clearer definitions of certain cross-border crimes. Parliament welcomes the common approach to border control, asylum and immigration, including better external border security and agreements with third countries. They call for national governments to forewarn other Member States before taking significant unilateral steps in this area. They also call for the creation of a proper EU legal base for Europol.

Parliament wants the new European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control to be up and running as soon as possible, and stresses the need for early warning and immediate response mechanisms for natural disasters and health crises. It calls for intensified research into HIV/AIDS medication.

On consumer protection, the need for simplification of the rules on cross-border contracts is stressed, while opposing the merging of consumer policy and public health programmes.

- A stronger Europe in a safer world : Parliament calls for the steady and determined development of the EU's common foreign, security and defence policies to help project European values on the world stage. It wants to see rapid agreement on the setting up of the joint external action service, in a way which protects the prerogatives of both the Commission and Parliament.

A high priority on implementing a comprehensive neighbourhood policy is requested, while developing a strong new Eastern dimension and a strengthening and deepening of the Euro-Mediterranean dialogue. MEPs also ask for every possible effort to be made to achieve the reunification of Cyprus.

Parliament calls again or a strengthening of EU-US relations, including a genuine Transatlantic Partnership agreement, with commitments to remove the remaining trade barriers by 2015. MEPs oppose any lifting of the embargo on arms sales to China. They also call for clear and balanced EU input into the process of finding a lasting peace between Israel and a viable, democratic Palestinian state. They welcome the EU's positive role in the reconstruction of Iraq and in efforts to prevent Iran form acquiring military nuclear capability.

Parliament is gravely concerned that none of the eight Millennium Development Goals for sub-Saharan Africa have been met or are on track to be met by 2015. It says the international community must dramatically increase both the quality and quantity of its development assistance.

The Commission's aim to build a strong coalition for further post-Kyoto action on climate change is encouraged, while also encouraging the USA to bring forward its own proposals in this field. They also underline the importance of a multilateral approach to trade policy and a successful conclusion of the Doha Development Agenda. They stress the importance of progressively removing import barriers on goods from developing countries and progressively eliminating all forms of EU export subsidy on agricultural products.

- A Europe that works better - closer to the citizen : the House welcomes the Commission's commitment to applying an impact assessment process for all legislative measures of substance. They invite the Commission to develop a more ambitious approach for guaranteeing Member States comply with their obligations to implement EU directives. They also want a considerably more ambitious approach to the simplification of existing legislation.

Parliament stresses the paramount importance of making Europe work better and bringing it closer to the citizens, and that therefore the EU institutions should work together to help ensure the ratification of the Constitution.

Lastly, Parliament welcomes the Commission's emphasis on value for money and accountability as well as the suggestion of a roadmap aimed at securing a positive statement of assurance from the Court of Auditors. They again call for reforms to the EU Financial Regulation to remove all obstacles to proper implementation. They ask the Commission to create a secure and comprehensive internal control environment for the EU budget to address the problems arising from 'shared management' and to take a much tougher approach with decentralised paying agencies. Parliament emphasises the importance of including 'fraud-proofing' measures in all relevant legislative texts and expect the revision of the OLAF regulation to enhance that body's independent status. It urges the Commission to adopt a pro-active approach to encourage whistle-blowers to come forward, while stressing that the complete and successful implementation of the new accounting system is a priority for the year ahead.

Documents
2005/02/24
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2005/02/21
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2005/02/21
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2005/02/21
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2005/02/21
   Joint motion for resolution
Documents
2005/02/21
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2005/01/26
   EP - Debate in Parliament

Documents

Votes

RC- B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - am. 11 #

2005/02/24 Outcome: -: 329, +: 206, 0: 9
FR PT AT MT DK EE SE ES IT NL LU FI IE SI CY CZ SK EL LT LV BE HU GB DE PL
Total
61
20
17
3
13
1
15
33
31
21
4
13
8
6
4
19
12
20
8
8
22
17
56
79
53
icon: PSE PSE
148

Estonia PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
32

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
4
icon: NI NI
20

Austria NI

2

Italy NI

2

Slovakia NI

3

Belgium NI

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
17

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
27

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Spain ALDE

1

Italy ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
205

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Finland PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

RC- B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - am. 12 #

2005/02/24 Outcome: -: 317, +: 206, 0: 17
FR PT AT MT DK EE IT SE ES NL EL FI LU IE SK SI CY CZ BE LT LV HU GB DE PL
Total
59
20
17
3
13
1
31
15
31
21
20
13
3
8
12
6
4
19
22
8
8
17
56
80
53
icon: PSE PSE
147

Estonia PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
31

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
4
icon: NI NI
18

Austria NI

2

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

Belgium NI

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
27

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
17

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Spain ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
205

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

RC- B6-0106/2005- Programme législatif - am. 13 #

2005/02/24 Outcome: -: 339, +: 128, 0: 75
FR AT EL MT EE BE LU IE SI CY CZ DK SE LV FI IT LT NL SK PT HU ES GB PL DE
Total
61
17
20
3
1
22
4
8
6
4
19
12
15
8
13
31
8
21
12
20
17
32
56
53
79
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
33

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

France GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
4
icon: NI NI
20

Austria NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
147

Malta PSE

Against (2)

3

Estonia PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden PSE

3

Finland PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary PSE

Against (1)

4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
27

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2
icon: UEN UEN
17

Ireland UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Italy ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
205

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Finland PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

RC- B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - par. 6 #

2005/02/24 Outcome: -: 269, +: 242, 0: 33
DE PL HU LT LV IE CZ SK FI SI CY LU DK ES EE BE NL MT SE AT PT EL IT GB FR
Total
80
53
17
8
8
8
19
12
12
6
4
4
13
33
1
22
21
3
15
17
20
20
31
56
61
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
206

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Ireland PPE-DE

2
3

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Italy ALDE

Abstain (1)

4
icon: UEN UEN
17

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

Against (1)

3

Ireland UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
20

Slovakia NI

3

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

2

Italy NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
27

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
33

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: PSE PSE
147

Lithuania PSE

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia PSE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PSE

3

RC - B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - am. 7 #

2005/02/24 Outcome: -: 275, +: 253, 0: 13
FR BE PT IT AT SE MT DK EE LU NL ES CY FI EL LT IE SK SI CZ LV HU GB DE PL
Total
62
22
20
28
17
15
3
13
1
4
20
33
4
13
20
8
8
12
6
19
8
17
55
80
53
icon: PSE PSE
148

Estonia PSE

For (1)

1

Finland PSE

Against (1)

3

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
33

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
4
icon: NI NI
20

Italy NI

For (1)

2

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
27

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
17

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Italy ALDE

For (1)

3

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Netherlands ALDE

4

Spain ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
203

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

3

Finland PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

3

RC - B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - par. 24,3ème partie #

2005/02/24 Outcome: +: 311, -: 191, 0: 32
DE PL FR BE HU SK GB LV LT IT CZ ES PT SI CY FI EL LU EE DK SE NL MT IE AT
Total
79
53
62
19
17
12
54
8
8
28
18
33
19
6
4
13
20
3
1
13
15
21
3
8
17
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
205

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3
3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE-DE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Italy ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Spain ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
17

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Italy UEN

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2
icon: NI NI
16

Slovakia NI

3

Italy NI

For (1)

2

Austria NI

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
27

United Kingdom IND/DEM

Against (1)

6

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
32

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2
icon: PSE PSE
145

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Estonia PSE

For (1)

1

Sweden PSE

3

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

RC - B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - par. 40 #

2005/02/24 Outcome: +: 294, -: 230, 0: 7
DE PL LV HU LT NL SK FI SI ES IE CY LU BE IT AT DK EE SE EL MT FR PT CZ GB
Total
77
53
8
16
8
21
12
13
6
32
8
4
4
20
27
17
12
1
15
20
3
60
20
19
55
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
199

Lithuania PPE-DE

1
3

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Latvia ALDE

1
2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Italy ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
30

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: UEN UEN
17

Lithuania UEN

1

Ireland UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
20

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

Belgium NI

3

Italy NI

Against (1)

2

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Czechia IND/DEM

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
145

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

RC- B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - par. 42 #

2005/02/24 Outcome: +: 264, -: 256, 0: 14
DE PL HU LT BE SK LV SI IE CY FI NL LU ES EL EE DK IT MT AT SE PT FR CZ GB
Total
79
53
16
8
21
12
8
6
8
4
13
21
3
32
20
1
13
26
3
17
15
20
62
19
54
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
201

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

2
3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1

Italy ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: UEN UEN
17

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

Against (1)

3

Ireland UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
20

Belgium NI

3

Slovakia NI

3

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
27

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Czechia IND/DEM

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
32

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: PSE PSE
145

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Estonia PSE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

RC - B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - par. 57 #

2005/02/24 Outcome: +: 422, -: 89, 0: 10
DE FR PL ES HU AT PT BE IT NL FI SK EL LT LV DK SI IE CY LU MT EE GB SE CZ
Total
76
59
50
32
16
16
20
22
23
21
13
12
20
8
8
13
6
8
4
4
3
1
52
15
19
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
197
3

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
142

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Estonia PSE

For (1)

1

Sweden PSE

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Spain ALDE

1
2

Italy ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
32

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
14

Italy UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2
icon: NI NI
20

Austria NI

2

Belgium NI

3

Italy NI

Against (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
25

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Czechia IND/DEM

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
24

Germany GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

RC - B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - par. 71 #

2005/02/24 Outcome: -: 261, +: 255, 0: 6
DE PL HU LT LV SI CY SK IT BE IE LU ES FI EL EE NL DK SE MT AT PT CZ FR GB
Total
79
50
16
8
8
6
4
11
22
22
8
3
32
13
20
1
21
13
15
3
16
20
19
61
51
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
198

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2
3

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Italy ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: UEN UEN
15

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Italy NI

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
25

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Czechia IND/DEM

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
24

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
33

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: PSE PSE
142

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Estonia PSE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

RC - B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - par. 83,1ère partie #

2005/02/24 Outcome: +: 491, -: 25, 0: 3
DE FR PL GB ES NL PT EL IT CZ BE HU SE AT FI SK DK LV LT SI IE CY LU MT EE
Total
79
60
50
49
32
21
20
20
21
19
22
16
15
16
13
12
13
8
8
6
8
4
3
3
1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
196
3

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
142

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Estonia PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Spain ALDE

1

Italy ALDE

2
2

Sweden ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
33

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
24

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
25

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

Italy NI

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2
icon: UEN UEN
15

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Latvia UEN

Against (1)

3

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2

RC -B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - par. 83,2ème partie #

2005/02/24 Outcome: +: 410, -: 96, 0: 6
DE FR ES BE PL IT HU PT NL AT EL FI SK LV DK LT SI CY LU MT EE IE GB CZ SE
Total
79
60
32
19
50
21
16
19
21
16
20
13
12
8
12
8
6
4
3
3
1
8
47
19
15
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
195
3

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Ireland PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
141

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Czechia PSE

2

Sweden PSE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Spain ALDE

1

Italy ALDE

2
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
32

Spain Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Italy NI

Against (1)

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3
icon: UEN UEN
15

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
24
4

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
24

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

RC - B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - par. 89,1ère partie #

2005/02/24 Outcome: +: 324, -: 173, 0: 14
DE PL LV SK GB HU CZ FR LT SI ES CY LU IT EL BE IE FI AT EE NL MT SE PT DK
Total
77
50
8
12
49
16
19
59
8
6
32
4
4
20
20
21
8
13
15
1
21
3
14
19
12
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
195

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Ireland PPE-DE

2
3

Sweden PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Latvia ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Italy ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
30

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
15

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
24

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

3
icon: NI NI
18

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
24

Germany GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
139

Slovakia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Estonia PSE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PSE

3

RC - B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - par. 89,2ème partie #

2005/02/24 Outcome: +: 272, -: 201, 0: 38
PL DE CZ SK LT HU CY LV IE EL SI IT LU BE FI EE ES MT GB AT DK SE PT NL FR
Total
49
76
19
12
8
16
4
8
8
19
6
21
4
22
13
1
32
3
46
16
12
15
19
21
61
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
192

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Ireland PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2
3

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

2

Italy ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: UEN UEN
15

Lithuania UEN

1

Ireland UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
23

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

5

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
19

Italy NI

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
24

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
33

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: PSE PSE
140

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Estonia PSE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PSE

3

RC- B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - par. 89,3ème partie #

2005/02/24 Outcome: +: 245, -: 245, 0: 18
PL DE SK CZ EL HU LV IT CY SI LU ES IE EE LT MT AT BE PT FI DK SE NL GB FR
Total
50
76
12
19
19
16
8
20
4
6
4
33
4
1
8
3
16
22
20
13
12
14
21
48
59
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
194

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Lithuania PPE-DE

1
3

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Sweden PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: UEN UEN
14

Ireland UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
23

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2
5
icon: NI NI
17

Italy NI

Against (1)

2

Austria NI

2

Belgium NI

3
3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
24

Germany GUE/NGL

4

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
32

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Hungary ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Italy ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2
icon: PSE PSE
139

Slovakia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

Abstain (1)

3

Finland PSE

3

Sweden PSE

3

RC - B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - par. 89,4ème partie #

2005/02/24 Outcome: +: 303, -: 187, 0: 21
PL DE CZ HU SK ES LV LT IE EL SI CY FI LU BE IT EE SE GB DK MT PT AT NL FR
Total
50
76
19
16
12
34
8
8
8
20
6
4
13
3
21
21
1
14
47
12
3
20
15
20
60
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
196

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Ireland PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3
3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Sweden PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
3
icon: ALDE ALDE
64
2

Spain ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Italy ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
24
4

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: UEN UEN
15

Lithuania UEN

1

Ireland UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
18

Belgium NI

3

Italy NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
23

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

United Kingdom IND/DEM

5

Netherlands IND/DEM

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
30

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: PSE PSE
141

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Estonia PSE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PSE

3

RC -B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - cons. E #

2005/02/24 Outcome: +: 419, -: 71, 0: 15
DE FR ES PL BE NL IT HU AT PT DK SK EL FI LV LT SI IE CY LU SE MT EE GB CZ
Total
76
58
33
45
22
21
20
16
16
19
12
12
20
13
8
8
6
8
4
4
15
3
1
46
19
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
194

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
3

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
135

Slovakia PSE

2

Finland PSE

Against (1)

3

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Estonia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Spain ALDE

1

Italy ALDE

2
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
32

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: UEN UEN
14

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Ireland UEN

2
icon: NI NI
19

Belgium NI

3

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

2

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
24

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Czechia IND/DEM

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
24

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

RC- B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - cons. I #

2005/02/24 Outcome: +: 436, -: 39, 0: 22
DE FR PL ES PT BE NL IT HU EL AT FI DK SK LV LT SE IE SI CZ CY GB LU MT EE
Total
76
55
45
32
20
19
20
21
15
20
16
13
11
12
8
8
15
8
6
19
4
47
3
3
1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
190
3
3

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Ireland PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
135

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Estonia PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Spain ALDE

1

Italy ALDE

2
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
32

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
23
4

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: UEN UEN
14

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Ireland UEN

2
icon: NI NI
14

Italy NI

Against (1)

2

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
24

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

1

RC- B6-0106/2005 - Programme législatif - résolution #

2005/02/24 Outcome: +: 264, -: 201, 0: 37
PL DE HU SK LV LT BE SI IE CY FI IT NL LU ES EL DK EE GB SE MT CZ AT PT FR
Total
47
75
16
12
8
8
19
6
8
4
13
21
21
4
33
20
11
1
46
15
3
19
15
19
58
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
193

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

2
3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
64
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Italy ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: UEN UEN
16

Lithuania UEN

1

Ireland UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
24

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Czechia IND/DEM

1
icon: NI NI
14

Italy NI

Against (1)

2

Austria NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
23

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
31

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
137

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Estonia PSE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0106_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0106_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0115_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0115_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0120_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0120_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-6-2005-0106_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-6-2005-0106_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0053_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0053_EN.html
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050126&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20050126&type=CRE
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050221&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20050221&type=CRE
events/3
date
2005-02-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0053_EN.html title: T6-0053/2005
summary
events/3
date
2005-02-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0053_EN.html title: T6-0053/2005
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 38
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 037
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-106&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0106_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-115&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0115_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-120&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0120_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P6-RC-2005-106&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-6-2005-0106_EN.html
docs/4
date
2005-02-24T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects
body
EP
docs/4
date
2005-02-24T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects
body
EP
docs/5/docs/1/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2005&nu_doc=668
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2005&nu_doc=668
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-53
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0053_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2005-01-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050126&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050221&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-02-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=12305&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-53 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0053/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
    docs
    • date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-106&language=EN title: B6-0106/2005 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-115&language=EN title: B6-0115/2005 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-120&language=EN title: B6-0120/2005 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P6-RC-2005-106&language=EN title: RC-B6-0106/2005 type: Joint motion for resolution
    • date: 2005-02-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-53 title: T6-0053/2005 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:304E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 304 01.12.2005, p. 0277-0386 E summary: By 264 votes in favour to 201 against with 37 abstentions, the European Parliament has adopted a resolution on the Commission's legislative and work programme for 2005. This comprehensive overview included the following points, amongst others: - A more competitive and cohesive European Parliament : the Parliament welcomes the central importance attached to implementing the Lisbon Strategy and support attempts to target fewer and more complementary objectives. They invite the Commission to review the EU's Sustainable Development Strategy alongside the Lisbon Strategy. They also stress the importance of action at Member State and regional level as well as by the EU and call for rigorous impact assessment of all new initiatives. Parliament calls for further action to complete the single market, notably in energy, transport, telecommunications and financial and other services. It invites the Commission to review its proposal for a software patents directive (in line with the decisions already taken by the Legal Affairs Committee and the Conference of Presidents). On financial services, Parliament support approval of measures already in the pipeline, but ask the Commission to avoid bringing forward new proposals unless they are duly justified and assessed. They applaud steps to improve the business environment, including entrepreneurship and good corporate governance, while stressing the importance of consistency in the contract law area. Parliament welcomes the high priority given to strengthening the EU's research and development effort. MEPs state their belief that a strong competition policy and the effective enforcement of its rules are extremely important in improving competitiveness. They welcome the Commission's plans to promote competitive practices in a number of sectors, while supported the aim of ensuring less, better focussed state aid - though there should be no discrimination between the Members States on this matter. Parliament call for the essential structure of the Stability and Growth Pact to be safeguarded in any proposed reform, in particular regarding the three per cent deficit rule, but also with more attention to be paid to the public debt position of the Member States. Cohesion policy, they assert, is important in its own right, but also as a method for achieving the Lisbon objectives. They support the Commission's efforts to persuade Member States that the Trans-European Network projects should be planned and financed on the basis of support both from the EU budget and, where possible, through public-private partnerships. - Improving Europe's quality of life : Parliament says the effective implementation of the EU Biodiversity Plan will require appropriate financial resources, including for the Natura 2000 network. They call for the Commission and Parliament to work together to find a balanced solution on the REACH proposals. They also say it is time to update the rules on animal health and welfare in the light of new scientific developments. They call for the use of renewable and innovative energy solutions to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. Parliament welcomes the ongoing reform of the Common Agricultural Policy, but is concerned that this should not lead to distortions of competition among farmers in the Member States, while opposing renationalisation. On the other hand, MEPs regret the lack of proposals on the Common Fisheries Policy, given the large number of outstanding issues for the fundamentally important fisheries sector. Parliament looks forward to concrete guidelines for the manifold challenges linked to an ageing population, especially proposals to provide the highest possible quality of life for the elderly, while ensuring sustainable pensions and health systems. They call on the Commission to work with Member States to increase the labour market participation of people over the age of 55, and call for a stronger emphasis on a 'child-friendly' working environment. They repeat that a strong and vibrant social dimension is an important component of a successful and dynamic economy. Parliament also calls for adequate EU funding for education, culture, youth and media programmes, and looks forward to the Commission communication on youth policy. It also wants to see detailed proposals on how to tackle the gender pay-gap in coming years. - A safer Europe for the citizen : Parliament stresses the need to seek an appropriate balance between increased security for citizens and proper protection for their fundamental rights. This requires a proper evaluation of measures already adopted. The fight against terrorism and organised crime is critical to building a safer Europe, and the Commission should urgently work on clearer definitions of certain cross-border crimes. Parliament welcomes the common approach to border control, asylum and immigration, including better external border security and agreements with third countries. They call for national governments to forewarn other Member States before taking significant unilateral steps in this area. They also call for the creation of a proper EU legal base for Europol. Parliament wants the new European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control to be up and running as soon as possible, and stresses the need for early warning and immediate response mechanisms for natural disasters and health crises. It calls for intensified research into HIV/AIDS medication. On consumer protection, the need for simplification of the rules on cross-border contracts is stressed, while opposing the merging of consumer policy and public health programmes. - A stronger Europe in a safer world : Parliament calls for the steady and determined development of the EU's common foreign, security and defence policies to help project European values on the world stage. It wants to see rapid agreement on the setting up of the joint external action service, in a way which protects the prerogatives of both the Commission and Parliament. A high priority on implementing a comprehensive neighbourhood policy is requested, while developing a strong new Eastern dimension and a strengthening and deepening of the Euro-Mediterranean dialogue. MEPs also ask for every possible effort to be made to achieve the reunification of Cyprus. Parliament calls again or a strengthening of EU-US relations, including a genuine Transatlantic Partnership agreement, with commitments to remove the remaining trade barriers by 2015. MEPs oppose any lifting of the embargo on arms sales to China. They also call for clear and balanced EU input into the process of finding a lasting peace between Israel and a viable, democratic Palestinian state. They welcome the EU's positive role in the reconstruction of Iraq and in efforts to prevent Iran form acquiring military nuclear capability. Parliament is gravely concerned that none of the eight Millennium Development Goals for sub-Saharan Africa have been met or are on track to be met by 2015. It says the international community must dramatically increase both the quality and quantity of its development assistance. The Commission's aim to build a strong coalition for further post-Kyoto action on climate change is encouraged, while also encouraging the USA to bring forward its own proposals in this field. They also underline the importance of a multilateral approach to trade policy and a successful conclusion of the Doha Development Agenda. They stress the importance of progressively removing import barriers on goods from developing countries and progressively eliminating all forms of EU export subsidy on agricultural products. - A Europe that works better - closer to the citizen : the House welcomes the Commission's commitment to applying an impact assessment process for all legislative measures of substance. They invite the Commission to develop a more ambitious approach for guaranteeing Member States comply with their obligations to implement EU directives. They also want a considerably more ambitious approach to the simplification of existing legislation. Parliament stresses the paramount importance of making Europe work better and bringing it closer to the citizens, and that therefore the EU institutions should work together to help ensure the ratification of the Constitution. Lastly, Parliament welcomes the Commission's emphasis on value for money and accountability as well as the suggestion of a roadmap aimed at securing a positive statement of assurance from the Court of Auditors. They again call for reforms to the EU Financial Regulation to remove all obstacles to proper implementation. They ask the Commission to create a secure and comprehensive internal control environment for the EU budget to address the problems arising from 'shared management' and to take a much tougher approach with decentralised paying agencies. Parliament emphasises the importance of including 'fraud-proofing' measures in all relevant legislative texts and expect the revision of the OLAF regulation to enhance that body's independent status. It urges the Commission to adopt a pro-active approach to encourage whistle-blowers to come forward, while stressing that the complete and successful implementation of the new accounting system is a priority for the year ahead. type: Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects body: EP
    • date: 2005-12-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0668/COM_COM(2005)0668_EN.pdf title: COM(2005)0668 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2005&nu_doc=668 title: EUR-Lex summary: In 2000, the European Commission launched a far reaching administrative reform initiative, the purpose of which was to reform and overhaul its working methods, financial management systems and personnel policy. Four “pillars” of reform were established. Firstly, creating a culture of service and efficiency. Secondly, examining strategic planning and programming. Thirdly, reviewing its personnel policy. Fourthly, reforming its auditing, financial management and control policies. Five key principles governed these measures namely, independence, responsibility, accountability, efficiency and transparency. This report, which covers the period from February 2004 to the present, responds to a specific request from the European Parliament, on the Commission’s legislative work programme 2005, and for an account of the reform process launched in 2000. In preparing this report, the Commission has taken stock of progress thus far. Additionally, it has prepared an account of future developments in the field of strategic planning, financial and human resource management and new working methods. In summary, the report makes the following findings: Creating a culture of service and efficiency: Reform has brought significant improvements to transparency within the Commission and has led to an efficiency drive in how it responds to public requests. A “Code of good administrative behaviour” has led to a set of rules which seek to offer the public an open and transparent service. A record number of people are seeking access to Commission documents – as witnessed by a 70% increase in requests between 2003-2004. The Commission has also strived to implement improvement to European governance, through measures such as the 2002 Action Plan on Better Regulation. In September 2005, the Commission presented the results of a screening programme under which the Commission announced it was withdrawing 68 pieces of pending legislation. In other areas the Commission has simplified its working methods and procedures in order to improve and help co-ordinate its internal workings. To guarantee that resources are spent as effectively as possible, the Commission is increasingly externalising a lot of its implementation of certain programmes to executive agencies. Strategic planning and programming: The Commission’s “Strategic Planning and Programming Cycle” (SPP) requires managers to prepare policies by setting high-level objectives, which in turn feed through into resource allocation and operation planning. This is followed by a monitoring phase as well as ex-post reporting. ABM instruments are integrated into the Commission’s working methods and used for the purpose of communicating with the other EU institutions. Further, when presenting the Commission’s work programme for 2005, the Commission President Barroso expressed his wish to work even more closely with the other institutions to deliver common objectives. This was later boosted by the Framework Agreement between the Council and the European Parliament, in which regular bi-lateral dialogue at the highest level was stressed. Commission President Barroso has also placed a new emphasis on communication, listening to the citizens and working for and with them. - Personnel policy : New staff regulations were adopted in March 2004. These were complemented by implementing rules relating to personal liability, professional incompetence and contracts relating to contract and temporary staff. The gradual phasing out of auxiliary staff began in 2004 and in June 2005 EPSO launched a competition for contract staff to set up its data base. In 2005 the third full exercise of the new staff appraisal system was completed. Training has played a significant role in the Commission’s human resources policy, with the average number of training days per official in 2004 being 9.1. In addition, the Commission adopted the “Fourth Action Programme for Equal Opportunities for Women and Men at the Commission.” Audit, financial management and control: The 2004 Annual Activity Reports (AAR’s) drew a globally satisfactory picture of the management and control situation. In the same year preparations were undertaken for the transition to accrual accounting by 1 January 2005. The Internal Audit Service (IAS) concluded a series of in-depth audits throughout 2004 with the result that the IAS and IAC’s now apply common minimum standards for audit reporting and in particular on the rating of audit observations/recommendations. To conclude, the internal reforms undertaken by the Commission in 2000 amounted to a major modernisation exercise involving an overhaul of its working methods, procedures and regulations. This achievement was made possible through the efforts of its internal staff. Now that the reform process per se has been concluded, the Commission is determined to build upon its achievements and to ensure that its resources, both financial and human, are used to best effect. The Commission remains committed to delivering strategic objectives and to focusing attention on the formulation of effective policies. To achieve these ends, the Commission proposes to continue the process of consolidation and simplification of internal procedures, to enshrine a policy of continual learning, to build upon its successes in the field of accountability and transparency and lastly to enhance its management culture based on a policy of responsibility and improved external communication. type: Follow-up document body: EC
    events
    • date: 2005-01-26T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050126&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050221&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2005-02-24T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=12305&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2005-02-24T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-53 title: T6-0053/2005 summary: By 264 votes in favour to 201 against with 37 abstentions, the European Parliament has adopted a resolution on the Commission's legislative and work programme for 2005. This comprehensive overview included the following points, amongst others: - A more competitive and cohesive European Parliament : the Parliament welcomes the central importance attached to implementing the Lisbon Strategy and support attempts to target fewer and more complementary objectives. They invite the Commission to review the EU's Sustainable Development Strategy alongside the Lisbon Strategy. They also stress the importance of action at Member State and regional level as well as by the EU and call for rigorous impact assessment of all new initiatives. Parliament calls for further action to complete the single market, notably in energy, transport, telecommunications and financial and other services. It invites the Commission to review its proposal for a software patents directive (in line with the decisions already taken by the Legal Affairs Committee and the Conference of Presidents). On financial services, Parliament support approval of measures already in the pipeline, but ask the Commission to avoid bringing forward new proposals unless they are duly justified and assessed. They applaud steps to improve the business environment, including entrepreneurship and good corporate governance, while stressing the importance of consistency in the contract law area. Parliament welcomes the high priority given to strengthening the EU's research and development effort. MEPs state their belief that a strong competition policy and the effective enforcement of its rules are extremely important in improving competitiveness. They welcome the Commission's plans to promote competitive practices in a number of sectors, while supported the aim of ensuring less, better focussed state aid - though there should be no discrimination between the Members States on this matter. Parliament call for the essential structure of the Stability and Growth Pact to be safeguarded in any proposed reform, in particular regarding the three per cent deficit rule, but also with more attention to be paid to the public debt position of the Member States. Cohesion policy, they assert, is important in its own right, but also as a method for achieving the Lisbon objectives. They support the Commission's efforts to persuade Member States that the Trans-European Network projects should be planned and financed on the basis of support both from the EU budget and, where possible, through public-private partnerships. - Improving Europe's quality of life : Parliament says the effective implementation of the EU Biodiversity Plan will require appropriate financial resources, including for the Natura 2000 network. They call for the Commission and Parliament to work together to find a balanced solution on the REACH proposals. They also say it is time to update the rules on animal health and welfare in the light of new scientific developments. They call for the use of renewable and innovative energy solutions to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. Parliament welcomes the ongoing reform of the Common Agricultural Policy, but is concerned that this should not lead to distortions of competition among farmers in the Member States, while opposing renationalisation. On the other hand, MEPs regret the lack of proposals on the Common Fisheries Policy, given the large number of outstanding issues for the fundamentally important fisheries sector. Parliament looks forward to concrete guidelines for the manifold challenges linked to an ageing population, especially proposals to provide the highest possible quality of life for the elderly, while ensuring sustainable pensions and health systems. They call on the Commission to work with Member States to increase the labour market participation of people over the age of 55, and call for a stronger emphasis on a 'child-friendly' working environment. They repeat that a strong and vibrant social dimension is an important component of a successful and dynamic economy. Parliament also calls for adequate EU funding for education, culture, youth and media programmes, and looks forward to the Commission communication on youth policy. It also wants to see detailed proposals on how to tackle the gender pay-gap in coming years. - A safer Europe for the citizen : Parliament stresses the need to seek an appropriate balance between increased security for citizens and proper protection for their fundamental rights. This requires a proper evaluation of measures already adopted. The fight against terrorism and organised crime is critical to building a safer Europe, and the Commission should urgently work on clearer definitions of certain cross-border crimes. Parliament welcomes the common approach to border control, asylum and immigration, including better external border security and agreements with third countries. They call for national governments to forewarn other Member States before taking significant unilateral steps in this area. They also call for the creation of a proper EU legal base for Europol. Parliament wants the new European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control to be up and running as soon as possible, and stresses the need for early warning and immediate response mechanisms for natural disasters and health crises. It calls for intensified research into HIV/AIDS medication. On consumer protection, the need for simplification of the rules on cross-border contracts is stressed, while opposing the merging of consumer policy and public health programmes. - A stronger Europe in a safer world : Parliament calls for the steady and determined development of the EU's common foreign, security and defence policies to help project European values on the world stage. It wants to see rapid agreement on the setting up of the joint external action service, in a way which protects the prerogatives of both the Commission and Parliament. A high priority on implementing a comprehensive neighbourhood policy is requested, while developing a strong new Eastern dimension and a strengthening and deepening of the Euro-Mediterranean dialogue. MEPs also ask for every possible effort to be made to achieve the reunification of Cyprus. Parliament calls again or a strengthening of EU-US relations, including a genuine Transatlantic Partnership agreement, with commitments to remove the remaining trade barriers by 2015. MEPs oppose any lifting of the embargo on arms sales to China. They also call for clear and balanced EU input into the process of finding a lasting peace between Israel and a viable, democratic Palestinian state. They welcome the EU's positive role in the reconstruction of Iraq and in efforts to prevent Iran form acquiring military nuclear capability. Parliament is gravely concerned that none of the eight Millennium Development Goals for sub-Saharan Africa have been met or are on track to be met by 2015. It says the international community must dramatically increase both the quality and quantity of its development assistance. The Commission's aim to build a strong coalition for further post-Kyoto action on climate change is encouraged, while also encouraging the USA to bring forward its own proposals in this field. They also underline the importance of a multilateral approach to trade policy and a successful conclusion of the Doha Development Agenda. They stress the importance of progressively removing import barriers on goods from developing countries and progressively eliminating all forms of EU export subsidy on agricultural products. - A Europe that works better - closer to the citizen : the House welcomes the Commission's commitment to applying an impact assessment process for all legislative measures of substance. They invite the Commission to develop a more ambitious approach for guaranteeing Member States comply with their obligations to implement EU directives. They also want a considerably more ambitious approach to the simplification of existing legislation. Parliament stresses the paramount importance of making Europe work better and bringing it closer to the citizens, and that therefore the EU institutions should work together to help ensure the ratification of the Constitution. Lastly, Parliament welcomes the Commission's emphasis on value for money and accountability as well as the suggestion of a roadmap aimed at securing a positive statement of assurance from the Court of Auditors. They again call for reforms to the EU Financial Regulation to remove all obstacles to proper implementation. They ask the Commission to create a secure and comprehensive internal control environment for the EU budget to address the problems arising from 'shared management' and to take a much tougher approach with decentralised paying agencies. Parliament emphasises the importance of including 'fraud-proofing' measures in all relevant legislative texts and expect the revision of the OLAF regulation to enhance that body's independent status. It urges the Commission to adopt a pro-active approach to encourage whistle-blowers to come forward, while stressing that the complete and successful implementation of the new accounting system is a priority for the year ahead.
    • date: 2005-02-24T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
      procedure/legal_basis/0
      Rules of Procedure EP 037
      procedure/legal_basis/0
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 037
      procedure/subject
      Old
      • 8.40.03 European Commission
      New
      8.40.03
      European Commission
      procedure/subtype
      Old
      Resolution on statements
      New
      Resolution on statement
      activities
      • date: 2005-01-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050126&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
      • date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050221&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
      • date: 2005-02-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=12305&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-53 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0053/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
      committees
        links
        other
          procedure
          reference
          2004/2563(RSP)
          title
          Resolution on the Commission's legislative and work programme for 2005
          legal_basis
          Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 037
          stage_reached
          Procedure completed
          subtype
          Resolution on statements
          type
          RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
          subject
          8.40.03 European Commission