Progress: Procedure completed
Legal Basis:
RoP 136-p5Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 326 votes to 68, with 24 abstentions, a resolution tabled by the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development on the forthcoming reform of the common organisation of the market in sugar.
The resolution underlines that the reform of the common organisation of the market in sugar should serve to ensure that prices are set at a level which will provide an adequate income both for Community producers and for suppliers based in the ACP countries and in the LDCs. MEPs consider that the general tendency of the Commission communications is to upset the existing balance in the sugar sector (to the detriment of Community producers, suppliers based in the LDCs and ACP producers), and to threaten to eliminate the growing of beet, the sugar industry and associated economic activities in numerous regions of the European Union.
MEPs consider that the reduction in prices and quotas envisaged by the Commission will lead to devastating income losses for those involved in the sugar sector, without - in all probability - bringing any real benefit to consumers.
Internal aspects of the reform : Parliament notes that the reduction in sugar prices proposed by the Commission goes beyond the requirements for compliance with the WTO rules . It therefore calls for this reduction to be limited to what is strictly necessary to achieve and maintain a sustainable, efficient, robust sugar production in the EU, in compliance with the WTO rules. It rejects the Commission's proposal to increase quotas for isoglucose, as this would make it necessary to further reduce the quotas for sugar.
Parliament considers that the current reference price system proposed by the Commission is not workable and will fail to achieve market stability. It therefore suggests that the current price support system should be maintained as a safety net, to prevent severe imbalances developing in the sugar market.
Deploring that the question of quota ownership has not yet been legally determined, MEPs call on the Commission to establish that the quotas are owned by the individual beet and cane growers. They reject the quota transfer system proposed by the Commission on the grounds that it threatens those that are most vulnerable, in particular by causing a transfer of jobs and a relocation of productive activity which is unacceptable.
The Commission, inter alia, is called upon to:
carry out a detailed impact assessment without delay for the purpose of studying the socio-economic repercussions which the reform will have both in the case of sugar beet producers and in the case of workers in the industry, and also the effect which it will have on the abandonment of certain rural areas in the EU; consider setting up a specific fund, managed by the European Union, to enable those wishing to leave the system to do so under reasonable conditions, through the voluntary sale of quotas to the European Union at an attractive price, degressive over time, for a limited period, immediately after which these quotas should be abolished; withdraw its proposal which allows the transfer of quotas between Member States; carefully assess the production situation in the disadvantaged areas of the EU and will identify the action which needs to be taken in order to prevent sugar-beet production from ceasing in such areas in the wake of the reform; monitor closely the social consequences of the possible closure of factories, due to the forthcoming reform of the sugar regime, and to take appropriate action if social plans are unsatisfactory.
MEPs calls for the application of social and environmental standards to the production of sugar both as food and fuel . They call on the Commission to examine the possibilities of using sugar as biofuel, from an economic and environmental point of view.
The resolution points out that stakeholders in the sugar sector need sufficient predictability if they are to make the necessary investments to become more competitive; considers, therefore, that it is vital that the Commission should now clarify its intentions for the post-2008 period and it suggests that the reform of the common organisation of the market should not be altered until the end of 2012.
External aspects of the reform : Parliament urges the Commission to satisfy the requests of the ACP countries and the LDCs and explore the possibility of a regulatory arrangement for the EBA initiative which allows the European Union to retain its ability to manage supply and avoids making the level of Community production the obligatory adjustment variable of the new common organisation of the market. It also calls for the Commission's legislative proposal to make it impossible to export any sugar from third countries to the European Union through triangular trade via the LDCs and calls for the production of imported sugar to be subject to the same social and environmental standards as production of sugar in the EU.
The Commission is called upon to :
improve the control systems put in place to verify whether the rules of origin are respected, especially since increased access to the European market through the EBA scheme may create price differences which could incite fraudulent practices; urgently propose proper flanking measures to assist ACP countries depending heavily on sugar exports to the EU in increasing their competitiveness and enhancing their capacity to diversify their economic base; ensure that the current reform is built into the European Union's position in the WTO negotiations so that future multilateral commitments do not require further reform, which would result in producers having to pay twice; negotiate coupling of the reform of the European common organisation of the market in sugar to similar reforms of the sugar market organisation in other countries, predominantly the United States of America do its utmost to reach international agreements within the WTO framework on the control of sugar production and sugar prices.
The European Parliament adopted by 326 votes to 68, with 24 abstentions, a resolution tabled by the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development on the forthcoming reform of the common organisation of the market in sugar.
The resolution underlines that the reform of the common organisation of the market in sugar should serve to ensure that prices are set at a level which will provide an adequate income both for Community producers and for suppliers based in the ACP countries and in the LDCs. MEPs consider that the general tendency of the Commission communications is to upset the existing balance in the sugar sector (to the detriment of Community producers, suppliers based in the LDCs and ACP producers), and to threaten to eliminate the growing of beet, the sugar industry and associated economic activities in numerous regions of the European Union.
MEPs consider that the reduction in prices and quotas envisaged by the Commission will lead to devastating income losses for those involved in the sugar sector, without - in all probability - bringing any real benefit to consumers.
Internal aspects of the reform : Parliament notes that the reduction in sugar prices proposed by the Commission goes beyond the requirements for compliance with the WTO rules . It therefore calls for this reduction to be limited to what is strictly necessary to achieve and maintain a sustainable, efficient, robust sugar production in the EU, in compliance with the WTO rules. It rejects the Commission's proposal to increase quotas for isoglucose, as this would make it necessary to further reduce the quotas for sugar.
Parliament considers that the current reference price system proposed by the Commission is not workable and will fail to achieve market stability. It therefore suggests that the current price support system should be maintained as a safety net, to prevent severe imbalances developing in the sugar market.
Deploring that the question of quota ownership has not yet been legally determined, MEPs call on the Commission to establish that the quotas are owned by the individual beet and cane growers. They reject the quota transfer system proposed by the Commission on the grounds that it threatens those that are most vulnerable, in particular by causing a transfer of jobs and a relocation of productive activity which is unacceptable.
The Commission, inter alia, is called upon to:
carry out a detailed impact assessment without delay for the purpose of studying the socio-economic repercussions which the reform will have both in the case of sugar beet producers and in the case of workers in the industry, and also the effect which it will have on the abandonment of certain rural areas in the EU; consider setting up a specific fund, managed by the European Union, to enable those wishing to leave the system to do so under reasonable conditions, through the voluntary sale of quotas to the European Union at an attractive price, degressive over time, for a limited period, immediately after which these quotas should be abolished; withdraw its proposal which allows the transfer of quotas between Member States; carefully assess the production situation in the disadvantaged areas of the EU and will identify the action which needs to be taken in order to prevent sugar-beet production from ceasing in such areas in the wake of the reform; monitor closely the social consequences of the possible closure of factories, due to the forthcoming reform of the sugar regime, and to take appropriate action if social plans are unsatisfactory.
MEPs calls for the application of social and environmental standards to the production of sugar both as food and fuel . They call on the Commission to examine the possibilities of using sugar as biofuel, from an economic and environmental point of view.
The resolution points out that stakeholders in the sugar sector need sufficient predictability if they are to make the necessary investments to become more competitive; considers, therefore, that it is vital that the Commission should now clarify its intentions for the post-2008 period and it suggests that the reform of the common organisation of the market should not be altered until the end of 2012.
External aspects of the reform : Parliament urges the Commission to satisfy the requests of the ACP countries and the LDCs and explore the possibility of a regulatory arrangement for the EBA initiative which allows the European Union to retain its ability to manage supply and avoids making the level of Community production the obligatory adjustment variable of the new common organisation of the market. It also calls for the Commission's legislative proposal to make it impossible to export any sugar from third countries to the European Union through triangular trade via the LDCs and calls for the production of imported sugar to be subject to the same social and environmental standards as production of sugar in the EU.
The Commission is called upon to :
improve the control systems put in place to verify whether the rules of origin are respected, especially since increased access to the European market through the EBA scheme may create price differences which could incite fraudulent practices; urgently propose proper flanking measures to assist ACP countries depending heavily on sugar exports to the EU in increasing their competitiveness and enhancing their capacity to diversify their economic base; ensure that the current reform is built into the European Union's position in the WTO negotiations so that future multilateral commitments do not require further reform, which would result in producers having to pay twice; negotiate coupling of the reform of the European common organisation of the market in sugar to similar reforms of the sugar market organisation in other countries, predominantly the United States of America do its utmost to reach international agreements within the WTO framework on the control of sugar production and sugar prices.
Documents
- Motion for a resolution: B6-0147/2005
- Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects: T6-0079/2005
- Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects: OJ C 320 15.12.2005, p. 0174-0271 E
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0079/2005
- Oral question/interpellation by Parliament: B6-0013/2005
- Debate in Council: 2643
- Debate in Council: 2635
- Debate in Council: 2633
- Oral question/interpellation by Parliament: B6-0013/2005
- Motion for a resolution: B6-0147/2005
- Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects: T6-0079/2005 OJ C 320 15.12.2005, p. 0174-0271 E
Votes
B6-0147/2005 - Marché du sucre - am. 6 #
GB | SE | FI | DK | LT | NL | CY | MT | SI | EE | LV | LU | BE | IE | AT | SK | PT | CZ | EL | HU | IT | ES | PL | FR | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
40
|
17
|
12
|
12
|
7
|
25
|
4
|
4
|
6
|
4
|
7
|
5
|
18
|
8
|
14
|
14
|
16
|
21
|
17
|
22
|
21
|
29
|
39
|
46
|
72
|
|
ALDE |
51
|
United Kingdom ALDE |
3
|
Finland ALDE |
2
|
3
|
Netherlands ALDE |
1
|
1
|
1
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (1) |
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
France ALDEFor (1)Against (6) |
4
|
|||||||||
NI |
15
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
Poland NIAgainst (2)Abstain (2) |
3
|
|||||||||||||||||||
UEN |
16
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
Poland UENAgainst (1)Abstain (4) |
|||||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
21
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Poland IND/DEMAgainst (8) |
|||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
31
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands Verts/ALEAgainst (1)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
France Verts/ALEFor (1) |
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (7)Abstain (1) |
|||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
23
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
Czechia GUE/NGLAgainst (5) |
3
|
2
|
4
|
|||||||||||||||
PSE |
136
|
United Kingdom PSEFor (7)Against (1) |
4
|
3
|
Denmark PSEAgainst (5) |
1
|
Netherlands PSEAgainst (7) |
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
Austria PSEAgainst (7) |
3
|
Portugal PSEAgainst (9) |
2
|
Greece PSEAgainst (5) |
Hungary PSEAgainst (7) |
Italy PSEAgainst (6) |
Spain PSEAgainst (17)
Alejandro CERCAS,
Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO,
Antonio MASIP HIDALGO,
Bárbara DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP,
Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE,
Inés AYALA SENDER,
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ,
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ,
Joan CALABUIG RULL,
Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA,
Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA,
Maria BADIA i CUTCHET,
María Isabel SALINAS GARCÍA,
Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ,
Raimon OBIOLS,
Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS,
Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
Poland PSEAgainst (6) |
France PSEAgainst (18)
Anne FERREIRA,
Benoît HAMON,
Bernadette VERGNAUD,
Catherine GUY-QUINT,
Catherine TRAUTMANN,
Françoise CASTEX,
Harlem DÉSIR,
Jean Louis COTTIGNY,
Jean-Claude FRUTEAU,
Kader ARIF,
Marie-Line REYNAUD,
Marie-Noëlle LIENEMANN,
Martine ROURE,
Michel ROCARD,
Pervenche BERÈS,
Pierre MOSCOVICI,
Pierre SCHAPIRA,
Stéphane LE FOLL
|
Germany PSEAgainst (15)Abstain (1) |
|||
PPE-DE |
187
|
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (18)Christopher HEATON-HARRIS, Den DOVER, Geoffrey VAN ORDEN, Giles CHICHESTER, James ELLES, John BOWIS, Malcolm HARBOUR, Martin CALLANAN, Neil PARISH, Nirj DEVA, Philip BRADBOURN, Philip BUSHILL-MATTHEWS, Richard ASHWORTH, Roger HELMER, Struan STEVENSON, Theresa VILLIERS, Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK, Timothy KIRKHOPE
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands PPE-DEFor (2)Against (4) |
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
Belgium PPE-DEAgainst (5) |
3
|
4
|
Slovakia PPE-DEAgainst (8) |
Portugal PPE-DEAgainst (5) |
Czechia PPE-DEFor (1)Against (11) |
Hungary PPE-DEAgainst (13) |
Italy PPE-DEAgainst (8) |
Poland PPE-DEFor (1)Against (13) |
11
|
Germany PPE-DEFor (1)Against (38)
Albert DESS,
Alexander RADWAN,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Armin LASCHET,
Bernd POSSELT,
Christa KLASS,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Ewa KLAMT,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hans-Gert PÖTTERING,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Hartmut NASSAUER,
Herbert REUL,
Horst SCHNELLHARDT,
Ingo FRIEDRICH,
Joachim WUERMELING,
Jürgen SCHRÖDER,
Karl von WOGAU,
Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT,
Klaus-Heiner LEHNE,
Kurt Joachim LAUK,
Kurt LECHNER,
Lutz GOEPEL,
Markus FERBER,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Rolf BEREND,
Ruth HIERONYMI,
Thomas MANN,
Thomas ULMER,
Werner LANGEN
Abstain (1) |
B6-0147/2005 - Marché du sucre - am. 7 #
FI | GB | LT | SE | CY | DK | SI | NL | MT | EE | LV | BE | LU | IE | AT | IT | SK | PT | CZ | EL | HU | ES | PL | FR | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
12
|
41
|
7
|
17
|
4
|
12
|
6
|
25
|
4
|
4
|
7
|
17
|
5
|
8
|
13
|
20
|
14
|
15
|
20
|
17
|
22
|
28
|
39
|
46
|
73
|
|
ALDE |
50
|
Finland ALDE |
United Kingdom ALDE |
3
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDE |
1
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (1) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
France ALDEFor (1)Against (6) |
4
|
|||||||||
NI |
14
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
Poland NIAgainst (4) |
3
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
21
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Poland IND/DEMAgainst (8) |
|||||||||||||||||
UEN |
16
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
Poland UENAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
|||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
23
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Czechia GUE/NGLAgainst (5) |
3
|
2
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (3)Abstain (1) |
|||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
31
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands Verts/ALEAgainst (1)Abstain (3) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
France Verts/ALEFor (1) |
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (7)Abstain (1) |
|||||||||||||
PSE |
132
|
3
|
United Kingdom PSEFor (2)Against (6) |
1
|
4
|
Denmark PSEAgainst (5) |
1
|
Netherlands PSEAgainst (7) |
3
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
Austria PSEAgainst (6) |
Italy PSEAgainst (6) |
3
|
Portugal PSEAgainst (8) |
1
|
Greece PSEAgainst (5) |
Hungary PSEAgainst (7) |
Spain PSEAgainst (16)
Alejandro CERCAS,
Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO,
Antonio MASIP HIDALGO,
Bárbara DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP,
Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE,
Inés AYALA SENDER,
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ,
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ,
Joan CALABUIG RULL,
Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA,
Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA,
Maria BADIA i CUTCHET,
María Isabel SALINAS GARCÍA,
Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ,
Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS,
Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
Poland PSEAgainst (6) |
France PSEAgainst (18)
Anne FERREIRA,
Benoît HAMON,
Bernadette VERGNAUD,
Catherine GUY-QUINT,
Catherine TRAUTMANN,
Françoise CASTEX,
Harlem DÉSIR,
Jean Louis COTTIGNY,
Jean-Claude FRUTEAU,
Kader ARIF,
Marie-Line REYNAUD,
Marie-Noëlle LIENEMANN,
Martine ROURE,
Michel ROCARD,
Pervenche BERÈS,
Pierre MOSCOVICI,
Pierre SCHAPIRA,
Stéphane LE FOLL
|
Germany PSEAgainst (15)Abstain (1) |
|||
PPE-DE |
189
|
3
|
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (6) |
1
|
Sweden PPE-DEFor (1)Against (3) |
1
|
1
|
4
|
Netherlands PPE-DEFor (2) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
Belgium PPE-DEAgainst (5) |
3
|
3
|
4
|
Italy PPE-DEAgainst (4) |
Slovakia PPE-DEAgainst (8) |
Portugal PPE-DEAgainst (5) |
Czechia PPE-DEAgainst (8)Abstain (4) |
Hungary PPE-DEFor (1)Against (12) |
Poland PPE-DEAgainst (11)Abstain (3) |
11
|
Germany PPE-DEFor (1)Against (39)
Albert DESS,
Alexander RADWAN,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Armin LASCHET,
Bernd POSSELT,
Christa KLASS,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Ewa KLAMT,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hans-Gert PÖTTERING,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Hartmut NASSAUER,
Herbert REUL,
Horst SCHNELLHARDT,
Ingo FRIEDRICH,
Joachim WUERMELING,
Jürgen SCHRÖDER,
Karl von WOGAU,
Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT,
Klaus-Heiner LEHNE,
Kurt Joachim LAUK,
Kurt LECHNER,
Lutz GOEPEL,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Rolf BEREND,
Ruth HIERONYMI,
Thomas MANN,
Thomas ULMER
Abstain (1) |
B6-0147/2005 - Marché du sucre - am. 24 #
GB | SE | DK | NL | EE | MT | LU | CY | LV | SI | BE | IT | FI | AT | LT | IE | SK | PT | HU | CZ | EL | ES | FR | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
41
|
17
|
12
|
23
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
4
|
7
|
6
|
18
|
18
|
12
|
13
|
7
|
8
|
14
|
16
|
22
|
20
|
16
|
28
|
45
|
38
|
71
|
|
Verts/ALE |
31
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands Verts/ALEAbstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
France Verts/ALEFor (5) |
Germany Verts/ALEFor (8) |
|||||||||||||
ALDE |
49
|
United Kingdom ALDE |
3
|
2
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (1) |
1
|
Finland ALDEAgainst (5) |
3
|
2
|
1
|
France ALDEFor (1)Against (6) |
2
|
4
|
|||||||||
NI |
14
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
Poland NIAgainst (4) |
|||||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
21
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Poland IND/DEMAgainst (8) |
|||||||||||||||||
UEN |
16
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
Poland UENAgainst (5) |
|||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
23
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
Czechia GUE/NGLAgainst (5) |
3
|
2
|
4
|
|||||||||||||||
PSE |
130
|
United Kingdom PSEFor (7)Against (1) |
4
|
Denmark PSEAgainst (1) |
Netherlands PSEAbstain (1) |
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
5
|
3
|
Austria PSEAgainst (5)Abstain (1) |
1
|
3
|
Portugal PSEFor (1)Against (7)Abstain (1) |
Hungary PSEFor (2)Against (5) |
2
|
Greece PSEAgainst (5) |
Spain PSEFor (1)Against (15)
Alejandro CERCAS,
Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO,
Antonio MASIP HIDALGO,
Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE,
Inés AYALA SENDER,
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ,
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ,
Joan CALABUIG RULL,
Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA,
Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA,
Maria BADIA i CUTCHET,
María Isabel SALINAS GARCÍA,
Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ,
Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS,
Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
France PSEAgainst (18)
Anne FERREIRA,
Benoît HAMON,
Bernadette VERGNAUD,
Catherine GUY-QUINT,
Catherine TRAUTMANN,
Françoise CASTEX,
Harlem DÉSIR,
Jean Louis COTTIGNY,
Jean-Claude FRUTEAU,
Kader ARIF,
Marie-Line REYNAUD,
Marie-Noëlle LIENEMANN,
Martine ROURE,
Michel ROCARD,
Pervenche BERÈS,
Pierre MOSCOVICI,
Pierre SCHAPIRA,
Stéphane LE FOLL
|
Poland PSEFor (1)Against (5) |
Germany PSEAgainst (12)Abstain (2) |
|||
PPE-DE |
185
|
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (18)Christopher HEATON-HARRIS, Den DOVER, Geoffrey VAN ORDEN, Giles CHICHESTER, James ELLES, John BOWIS, Malcolm HARBOUR, Martin CALLANAN, Neil PARISH, Nirj DEVA, Philip BRADBOURN, Philip BUSHILL-MATTHEWS, Richard ASHWORTH, Roger HELMER, Struan STEVENSON, Theresa VILLIERS, Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK, Timothy KIRKHOPE
Abstain (1) |
4
|
1
|
Netherlands PPE-DEAgainst (6) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
Belgium PPE-DEAgainst (5) |
Italy PPE-DEAgainst (3) |
3
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
Slovakia PPE-DEAgainst (8) |
Portugal PPE-DEAgainst (5) |
Hungary PPE-DEAgainst (13) |
Czechia PPE-DEFor (2)Against (9) |
8
|
11
|
Germany PPE-DEAgainst (40)
Albert DESS,
Alexander RADWAN,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Armin LASCHET,
Bernd POSSELT,
Christa KLASS,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Ewa KLAMT,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hans-Gert PÖTTERING,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Hartmut NASSAUER,
Herbert REUL,
Horst SCHNELLHARDT,
Ingo FRIEDRICH,
Joachim WUERMELING,
Jürgen SCHRÖDER,
Karl von WOGAU,
Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT,
Klaus-Heiner LEHNE,
Kurt Joachim LAUK,
Kurt LECHNER,
Lutz GOEPEL,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Rolf BEREND,
Ruth HIERONYMI,
Thomas MANN,
Thomas ULMER,
Werner LANGEN
Abstain (1) |
B6-0147/2005 - Marché du sucre - am. 8 #
GB | FI | SE | DK | NL | LV | BE | CY | LU | LT | MT | EE | SI | CZ | AT | IE | SK | IT | PT | EL | HU | ES | PL | FR | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
39
|
11
|
16
|
12
|
24
|
6
|
18
|
4
|
4
|
7
|
4
|
3
|
6
|
21
|
13
|
8
|
14
|
20
|
16
|
17
|
22
|
29
|
39
|
46
|
71
|
|
ALDE |
50
|
United Kingdom ALDE |
Finland ALDE |
3
|
2
|
Netherlands ALDE |
1
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (1) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
France ALDEFor (1)Against (6) |
4
|
|||||||||
Verts/ALE |
30
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands Verts/ALEAbstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
France Verts/ALEFor (5) |
Germany Verts/ALEFor (8) |
|||||||||||||
NI |
15
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Poland NIFor (2)Against (2) |
3
|
|||||||||||||||||||
UEN |
15
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
Poland UENAgainst (1) |
|||||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
21
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Poland IND/DEMAgainst (8) |
|||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
23
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Czechia GUE/NGLAgainst (5) |
2
|
3
|
2
|
4
|
|||||||||||||||
PSE |
130
|
United Kingdom PSEAgainst (3) |
2
|
3
|
Denmark PSEAgainst (5) |
Netherlands PSEFor (1)Against (6) |
4
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
Austria PSEAgainst (6) |
3
|
Italy PSEAgainst (6) |
Portugal PSEFor (1)Against (8) |
Greece PSEAgainst (5) |
Hungary PSEAgainst (7) |
Spain PSEAgainst (17)
Alejandro CERCAS,
Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO,
Antonio MASIP HIDALGO,
Bárbara DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP,
Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE,
Inés AYALA SENDER,
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ,
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ,
Joan CALABUIG RULL,
Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA,
Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA,
Maria BADIA i CUTCHET,
María Isabel SALINAS GARCÍA,
Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ,
Raimon OBIOLS,
Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS,
Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
Poland PSEAgainst (6) |
France PSEAgainst (18)
Anne FERREIRA,
Benoît HAMON,
Bernadette VERGNAUD,
Catherine GUY-QUINT,
Catherine TRAUTMANN,
Françoise CASTEX,
Harlem DÉSIR,
Jean Louis COTTIGNY,
Jean-Claude FRUTEAU,
Kader ARIF,
Marie-Line REYNAUD,
Marie-Noëlle LIENEMANN,
Martine ROURE,
Michel ROCARD,
Pervenche BERÈS,
Pierre MOSCOVICI,
Pierre SCHAPIRA,
Stéphane LE FOLL
|
Germany PSEAgainst (14)Abstain (1) |
||||
PPE-DE |
186
|
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (17) |
3
|
4
|
1
|
Netherlands PPE-DEAgainst (6) |
3
|
Belgium PPE-DEAgainst (5) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
Czechia PPE-DEAgainst (6) |
4
|
3
|
Slovakia PPE-DEAgainst (8) |
Italy PPE-DEFor (1)Against (7) |
Portugal PPE-DEAgainst (5) |
Hungary PPE-DEAgainst (13) |
Poland PPE-DEAgainst (14) |
11
|
Germany PPE-DEAgainst (39)
Albert DESS,
Alexander RADWAN,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Armin LASCHET,
Bernd POSSELT,
Christa KLASS,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Ewa KLAMT,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hans-Gert PÖTTERING,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Hartmut NASSAUER,
Herbert REUL,
Horst SCHNELLHARDT,
Ingo FRIEDRICH,
Joachim WUERMELING,
Jürgen SCHRÖDER,
Karl von WOGAU,
Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT,
Klaus-Heiner LEHNE,
Kurt Joachim LAUK,
Kurt LECHNER,
Lutz GOEPEL,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Renate SOMMER,
Rolf BEREND,
Ruth HIERONYMI,
Thomas MANN,
Thomas ULMER,
Werner LANGEN
Abstain (1) |
B6-0147/2005 - Marché du sucre - par. 18,2ème partie #
DE | FR | PL | ES | HU | EL | PT | IT | FI | SK | IE | AT | BE | SI | LT | CZ | LU | CY | LV | MT | NL | EE | DK | SE | GB | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
69
|
45
|
39
|
28
|
20
|
17
|
16
|
21
|
11
|
13
|
8
|
13
|
18
|
6
|
7
|
20
|
5
|
4
|
6
|
4
|
24
|
4
|
12
|
17
|
36
|
|
PPE-DE |
182
|
Germany PPE-DEFor (39)Albert DESS, Alexander RADWAN, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Armin LASCHET, Bernd POSSELT, Christa KLASS, Christian EHLER, Daniel CASPARY, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Doris PACK, Elisabeth JEGGLE, Ewa KLAMT, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Hans-Gert PÖTTERING, Hans-Peter MAYER, Hartmut NASSAUER, Herbert REUL, Horst SCHNELLHARDT, Ingo FRIEDRICH, Joachim WUERMELING, Jürgen SCHRÖDER, Karl von WOGAU, Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT, Klaus-Heiner LEHNE, Kurt Joachim LAUK, Kurt LECHNER, Lutz GOEPEL, Manfred WEBER, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Renate SOMMER, Rolf BEREND, Ruth HIERONYMI, Thomas MANN, Thomas ULMER, Werner LANGEN
Abstain (1) |
Poland PPE-DEFor (14) |
Hungary PPE-DEFor (12) |
Portugal PPE-DEAgainst (1) |
Italy PPE-DEFor (8) |
3
|
Slovakia PPE-DEFor (8) |
3
|
4
|
Belgium PPE-DE |
4
|
1
|
Czechia PPE-DEFor (4)Against (8) |
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Netherlands PPE-DEFor (6) |
1
|
1
|
Sweden PPE-DEFor (1)Against (3) |
United Kingdom PPE-DEAgainst (14) |
|||
PSE |
130
|
Germany PSEFor (13)Against (1) |
France PSEFor (17)Anne FERREIRA, Benoît HAMON, Bernadette VERGNAUD, Catherine GUY-QUINT, Catherine TRAUTMANN, Françoise CASTEX, Harlem DÉSIR, Jean Louis COTTIGNY, Jean-Claude FRUTEAU, Kader ARIF, Marie-Line REYNAUD, Marie-Noëlle LIENEMANN, Martine ROURE, Pervenche BERÈS, Pierre MOSCOVICI, Pierre SCHAPIRA, Stéphane LE FOLL
|
Poland PSEFor (5)Against (1) |
Spain PSEFor (17)Alejandro CERCAS, Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO, Antonio MASIP HIDALGO, Bárbara DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP, Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE, Inés AYALA SENDER, Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ, Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ, Joan CALABUIG RULL, Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA, Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA, Maria BADIA i CUTCHET, María Isabel SALINAS GARCÍA, Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ, Raimon OBIOLS, Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS, Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
Hungary PSEFor (6) |
Greece PSEFor (5) |
Portugal PSEFor (9) |
Italy PSEFor (6) |
3
|
3
|
Austria PSE |
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Netherlands PSEAgainst (3) |
3
|
Denmark PSEFor (1)Against (4) |
4
|
United Kingdom PSEAgainst (8) |
|||
GUE/NGL |
22
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Czechia GUE/NGL |
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|||||||||||||||
UEN |
15
|
Poland UENFor (5) |
2
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
NI |
14
|
3
|
Poland NI |
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
21
|
Poland IND/DEMFor (2) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
|||||||||||||||||
ALDE |
50
|
Germany ALDEAgainst (4) |
France ALDEFor (7) |
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
Belgium ALDEFor (1)Against (5) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (5) |
2
|
3
|
United Kingdom ALDEAgainst (6) |
|||||||||
Verts/ALE |
29
|
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (8) |
France Verts/ALEFor (1)Against (4) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands Verts/ALEAgainst (2)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
4
|
B6-0147/2005 - Marché du sucre - am. 12 #
SE | DK | MT | EE | CY | LU | GB | LV | SI | FI | LT | IE | AT | SK | IT | PT | NL | EL | HU | BE | CZ | ES | PL | FR | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
17
|
10
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
34
|
6
|
6
|
11
|
7
|
8
|
13
|
13
|
18
|
15
|
23
|
16
|
21
|
17
|
21
|
29
|
39
|
43
|
63
|
|
IND/DEM |
20
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Poland IND/DEMAgainst (8) |
||||||||||||||||||
NI |
14
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Poland NIAgainst (4) |
3
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
29
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands Verts/ALEAgainst (2)Abstain (1) |
1
|
2
|
France Verts/ALEAgainst (5) |
Germany Verts/ALEFor (1)Against (6)Abstain (1) |
|||||||||||||
UEN |
15
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
Poland UENAgainst (5) |
|||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
21
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
Czechia GUE/NGLAgainst (5) |
2
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||
PSE |
120
|
4
|
Denmark PSE |
3
|
3
|
1
|
United Kingdom PSEFor (8) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
Austria PSEAgainst (5)Abstain (1) |
3
|
Italy PSEFor (3)Against (2) |
Portugal PSEAgainst (7)Abstain (1) |
Netherlands PSEAgainst (2)Abstain (1) |
Greece PSE |
Hungary PSEFor (2)Against (4) |
3
|
2
|
Spain PSEAgainst (16)
Alejandro CERCAS,
Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO,
Antonio MASIP HIDALGO,
Bárbara DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP,
Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE,
Inés AYALA SENDER,
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ,
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ,
Joan CALABUIG RULL,
Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA,
Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA,
Maria BADIA i CUTCHET,
María Isabel SALINAS GARCÍA,
Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ,
Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS,
Teresa RIERA MADURELL
Abstain (1) |
Poland PSEAgainst (6) |
Germany PSEFor (1)Against (8)Abstain (2) |
||||
ALDE |
51
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
United Kingdom ALDEAgainst (6) |
1
|
1
|
Finland ALDEAgainst (5) |
3
|
2
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (5) |
2
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (6) |
1
|
2
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
Germany ALDEAgainst (4) |
|||||||||
PPE-DE |
176
|
Sweden PPE-DEFor (3)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
United Kingdom PPE-DEAgainst (12) |
3
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
Slovakia PPE-DEAgainst (8) |
Italy PPE-DEAgainst (7) |
Portugal PPE-DEAgainst (5) |
Netherlands PPE-DEAgainst (6) |
Hungary PPE-DEAgainst (13) |
Belgium PPE-DEAgainst (5) |
Czechia PPE-DEAgainst (12) |
Poland PPE-DEAgainst (14) |
11
|
Germany PPE-DEFor (1)Against (35)
Albert DESS,
Alexander RADWAN,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Armin LASCHET,
Bernd POSSELT,
Christa KLASS,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Ewa KLAMT,
Hans-Gert PÖTTERING,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Hartmut NASSAUER,
Herbert REUL,
Ingo FRIEDRICH,
Joachim WUERMELING,
Jürgen SCHRÖDER,
Karl von WOGAU,
Klaus-Heiner LEHNE,
Kurt Joachim LAUK,
Kurt LECHNER,
Lutz GOEPEL,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Rolf BEREND,
Ruth HIERONYMI,
Thomas MANN,
Thomas ULMER,
Werner LANGEN
Abstain (1) |
B6-0147/2005 - Marché du sucre - am. 13 #
SE | DK | EE | MT | GB | LV | CY | LT | SI | LU | FI | SK | IE | AT | NL | BE | EL | IT | PT | HU | CZ | ES | PL | FR | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
17
|
11
|
4
|
4
|
34
|
6
|
4
|
7
|
6
|
5
|
11
|
13
|
8
|
13
|
23
|
18
|
16
|
19
|
15
|
21
|
21
|
29
|
39
|
42
|
63
|
|
NI |
14
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Poland NIAgainst (2) |
3
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
21
|
3
|
1
|
United Kingdom IND/DEMFor (3)Against (1) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Poland IND/DEMAgainst (8) |
|||||||||||||||||
UEN |
15
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
Poland UENAbstain (1) |
|||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
21
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Czechia GUE/NGLAgainst (5) |
2
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
27
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands Verts/ALEAgainst (2)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
France Verts/ALEAgainst (4) |
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (7) |
|||||||||||||
ALDE |
51
|
3
|
2
|
United Kingdom ALDEFor (1)Against (5) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Finland ALDEFor (1)Against (4) |
Netherlands ALDEFor (3)Against (2) |
Belgium ALDEFor (1)Against (5) |
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
Germany ALDEAgainst (1) |
|||||||||
PSE |
121
|
4
|
Denmark PSE |
3
|
3
|
United Kingdom PSEFor (8) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Austria PSEAgainst (5)Abstain (1) |
Netherlands PSEAgainst (3) |
4
|
Greece PSE |
Italy PSEFor (3)Against (2) |
Portugal PSEFor (1)Against (6)Abstain (1) |
Hungary PSEFor (1)Against (5) |
2
|
Spain PSEAgainst (17)
Alejandro CERCAS,
Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO,
Antonio MASIP HIDALGO,
Bárbara DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP,
Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE,
Inés AYALA SENDER,
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ,
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ,
Joan CALABUIG RULL,
Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA,
Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA,
Maria BADIA i CUTCHET,
María Isabel SALINAS GARCÍA,
Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ,
Raimon OBIOLS,
Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS,
Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
Poland PSEFor (1)Against (5) |
Germany PSEAgainst (9)Abstain (2) |
||||
PPE-DE |
179
|
Sweden PPE-DEFor (3)Against (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (1)Against (9)Abstain (2) |
3
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
Slovakia PPE-DEFor (1)Against (7) |
3
|
4
|
Netherlands PPE-DEAgainst (6) |
Belgium PPE-DEFor (1)Against (4) |
Greece PPE-DEFor (1)Against (8) |
Italy PPE-DEAgainst (8) |
Portugal PPE-DEAgainst (5) |
Hungary PPE-DEFor (1)Against (11)Abstain (1) |
Czechia PPE-DEAgainst (12) |
Poland PPE-DEAgainst (11) |
France PPE-DEFor (1)Against (10) |
Germany PPE-DEAgainst (33)
Albert DESS,
Alexander RADWAN,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Armin LASCHET,
Bernd POSSELT,
Christa KLASS,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Ewa KLAMT,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hans-Gert PÖTTERING,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Herbert REUL,
Ingo FRIEDRICH,
Joachim WUERMELING,
Karl von WOGAU,
Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT,
Klaus-Heiner LEHNE,
Kurt Joachim LAUK,
Kurt LECHNER,
Lutz GOEPEL,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Rolf BEREND,
Ruth HIERONYMI,
Thomas MANN,
Thomas ULMER,
Werner LANGEN
Abstain (1) |
B6-0147/2005 - Marché du sucre - résolution #
DE | FR | PL | ES | CZ | IT | HU | PT | EL | SK | FI | AT | IE | LT | BE | NL | SI | LV | LU | CY | EE | MT | GB | SE | DK | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
57
|
40
|
37
|
27
|
21
|
19
|
19
|
14
|
16
|
12
|
11
|
12
|
7
|
6
|
14
|
24
|
6
|
6
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
30
|
16
|
10
|
|
PPE-DE |
166
|
Germany PPE-DEFor (33)Albert DESS, Alexander RADWAN, Andreas SCHWAB, Armin LASCHET, Bernd POSSELT, Christa KLASS, Christian EHLER, Daniel CASPARY, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Doris PACK, Elisabeth JEGGLE, Ewa KLAMT, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Hans-Gert PÖTTERING, Hans-Peter MAYER, Hartmut NASSAUER, Herbert REUL, Jürgen SCHRÖDER, Karl von WOGAU, Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT, Kurt Joachim LAUK, Kurt LECHNER, Lutz GOEPEL, Manfred WEBER, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Rolf BEREND, Ruth HIERONYMI, Thomas MANN, Thomas ULMER, Werner LANGEN
Against (1) |
10
|
Czechia PPE-DEFor (12) |
Italy PPE-DEFor (8) |
Hungary PPE-DEFor (12) |
Portugal PPE-DE |
Slovakia PPE-DEFor (8) |
3
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
Netherlands PPE-DEFor (6) |
4
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (8)Abstain (2) |
4
|
1
|
|||||
PSE |
111
|
Germany PSEFor (6)Abstain (3) |
Poland PSEFor (6) |
Spain PSEFor (16)Alejandro CERCAS, Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO, Antonio MASIP HIDALGO, Bárbara DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP, Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE, Inés AYALA SENDER, Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ, Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ, Joan CALABUIG RULL, Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA, Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA, Maria BADIA i CUTCHET, Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ, Raimon OBIOLS, Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS, Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
2
|
5
|
Hungary PSE |
Portugal PSEFor (6)Abstain (1) |
Greece PSE |
2
|
2
|
5
|
1
|
4
|
Netherlands PSEFor (1)Against (3)Abstain (3) |
1
|
3
|
2
|
United Kingdom PSEAgainst (8) |
3
|
Denmark PSEAgainst (5) |
|||||
Verts/ALE |
26
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (6)Abstain (1) |
France Verts/ALEAbstain (1) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands Verts/ALEAbstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
21
|
3
|
2
|
Czechia GUE/NGL |
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
19
|
Poland IND/DEMFor (7) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||||
NI |
12
|
3
|
Poland NI |
1
|
2
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||
UEN |
14
|
Poland UENFor (5) |
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ALDE |
49
|
Germany ALDEAgainst (4) |
France ALDEFor (7) |
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
Finland ALDE |
3
|
Belgium ALDEFor (1)Against (4)Abstain (1) |
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (5) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom ALDEAgainst (2)Abstain (2) |
3
|
2
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0013_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0013_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0147_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0147_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0079_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0079_EN.html |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050310&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20050310&type=CRE |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 136-p5
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 128-p5
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-13&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0013_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-147&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0147_EN.html |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-79New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0079_EN.html |
activities |
|
committees |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 128-p5
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/subtype |
Old
Debate or resolution on oral questionsNew
Debate or resolution on oral question/interpellation |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|