BETA


2004/2620(RSP) Resolution on the reform of the United Nations

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:
RoP 132-p2

Events

2005/06/09
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on reform of the United Nations, drafted by Armin LASCHET (EPP-ED, DE). It warmly welcomed the report of the Report of the High-level Panel (hereafter RHP), which made more than a hundred recommendations on change and the need to reform the UN in order to address challenges and threats ranging from poverty, infectious diseases, environmental damage and civil violence to terrorism, weapons of mass destruction and nuclear non‑proliferation. The Report by the Secretary-General (hereafter RSG) emphasised and endorses most of these recommendations.

Collective security in the 21 st century: prevention, awareness and shared responsibility:

Parliament strongly supported the underlying determination to achieve a reform of the United Nations in order to adapt the organisation to new world realities and make it more efficient, equitable, geared to the long term and accountable in providing collective security in the 21st century. It particularly welcomed the realistic approach of both reports, which, unlike previous reform proposals, adequately combine vision with concrete and practice-oriented measures for action. It recommended strengthening the United Nations system and institutions, since they constitute the most appropriate and only global institutions potentially able to foster and ensure collective security in a manner which is both legitimate and efficient.

Parliament mentioned the following points with approval:

- the strict limitation of the notion of self-defence and the use of force and responsibility to protect civilian populations. Such a definition should not prevent the Security Council from acting preventively since it is the only legitimate body for such action;

- granting the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) an increased role and reinforced means, including the strengthening of its verification authority, in the fight against nuclear proliferation and in preventing the use of atomic, biological and chemical (ABC) weapons;

- the guaranteeing of the supply of fuel necessary to develop peaceful uses, such as an arrangement in which the IAEA would act as a guarantor for the supply of fissile material to civilian nuclear users at market rates for States who voluntarily forego the development of domestic uranium enrichment and plutonium separation facilities;

- the forging by the United Nations of a strategy of counter-terrorism which is respectful of human rights and the rule of law.

Parliament called for greater efforts by the EU Member States with a view to transforming armies into units suitable for deployment to peace operations, and to placing contingents on stand-by for UN purposes.

Freedom from want: a shared and balanced vision of a renewed UN development policy:

Parliament asked all actors to do their utmost to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Previous pledges from donor countries for the financing of development should be implemented – especially to achieve progress in the fight against HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis.

Parliament also endorsed the view that economic and social development and security and respect for human rights and safeguarding the environmentare intricately interdependent. Risk prevention through development can significantly reduce political, military or terrorist threats which derive from actual or perceived social inequalities, economic injustices and environmental degradations. Security issues are intimately linked to the achievement and consolidation of the MDGs.

Reformed institutions for greater representativeness and efficiency:

The necessary reform of the United Nations as a whole must by no means be limited or overshadowed by the reform of the Security Council and other institutional questions, although a rethinking of structures and working methods with a view to better representation and credibility is of the utmost importance. The composition of the Security Council should be changed in a way that takes into account the changed state of the international system as well as current geopolitical realities, by increasing the number of developing countries in the Council, by ensuring that its members are willing and able to act when action is needed, and by employing more effective and transparent working methods.

Parliament emphasised that an EU seat in the UN Security Council remains the aim for the EU as soon as the political, constitutional and legal conditions for such a seat are met.

It took note of the proposal to extend the composition of the UN Security Council by adding new seats for each regional group, including ‘Europe’. The appropriate solution would be to allocate an additional permanent seat to the EU. Parliament called on the Member States seriously to consider this proposal in order to enhance Europe’s influence in the world through a coherent and efficient Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). In any case, irrespective of the procedure for reform chosen, some of the additional seats for ‘Europe’ should be allocated to the EU as such. It called on the European Council to establish the appropriate mechanism to designate the EU Member States who will carry out their mandate as EU representatives in close coordination with the other EU Member States, the High Representative for the CFSP or the future Minister for Foreign Affairs, the Commission and the European Parliament until the conditions for an EU seat are met.

Parliament went on to call for significantly increased financial support from all member states for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, as well as the active involvement of the High Commissioner in the work and deliberations of the Security Council.

Other matters addressed by Parliament include the need to revitalise the General Assembly, and the upgrading of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), as well as the establishment of a permanent consultation mechanism between a reformed ECOSOC and the Bretton Woods Institutions as well as the World Trade Organisation (WTO). It felt that the reform proposals put forward by the RSG in the socio-economic field remain largely below actual needs for a body that brings together the key developed and developing countries to address the critical links between trade, finance, the environment and economic and social development.

Other suggestion include the following:

- the existing but dormant and obsolete Trusteeship Council be transformed into a Council for Failed States, which would be responsible, on behalf of the United Nations, for coordinating international cooperation in the case of failed States, and more widely for conflict prevention in failing States;

- the strengthening of international environmental governance through the upgrading of the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) into a United Nations specialised agency for the environment;

- member countries should provide UNESCO with enhanced budgetary resources in order to fulfil its important mandate;

- the establishment of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA) within the UN system, which would increase the democratic profile and internal democratic process of the organisation and allow world civil society to be directly associated in the decision-making process;

- the creation of a Democracy Fund aimed at encouraging, establishing and strengthening democracy worldwide, as called for in the RSG;

- strengthening the ‘UN Democracy Caucus’;

- encouraging the Council and the Commission actively to pursue the merging of their liaison offices and delegations into a common external EU delegation in each one of the following UN headquarters: New York, Geneva, Vienna and Nairobi;

Finally, Parliament called on its Bureau to commission a group of experts to draw up an initial blueprint detailing how the overall reform of the UN system might operate from the point of view both of the UN Charter and of the EU institutions.

2005/06/09
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2005/06/09
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on reform of the United Nations, drafted by Armin LASCHET (EPP-ED, DE). It warmly welcomed the report of the Report of the High-level Panel (hereafter RHP), which made more than a hundred recommendations on change and the need to reform the UN in order to address challenges and threats ranging from poverty, infectious diseases, environmental damage and civil violence to terrorism, weapons of mass destruction and nuclear non‑proliferation. The Report by the Secretary-General (hereafter RSG) emphasised and endorses most of these recommendations.

Collective security in the 21 st century: prevention, awareness and shared responsibility:

Parliament strongly supported the underlying determination to achieve a reform of the United Nations in order to adapt the organisation to new world realities and make it more efficient, equitable, geared to the long term and accountable in providing collective security in the 21st century. It particularly welcomed the realistic approach of both reports, which, unlike previous reform proposals, adequately combine vision with concrete and practice-oriented measures for action. It recommended strengthening the United Nations system and institutions, since they constitute the most appropriate and only global institutions potentially able to foster and ensure collective security in a manner which is both legitimate and efficient.

Parliament mentioned the following points with approval:

- the strict limitation of the notion of self-defence and the use of force and responsibility to protect civilian populations. Such a definition should not prevent the Security Council from acting preventively since it is the only legitimate body for such action;

- granting the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) an increased role and reinforced means, including the strengthening of its verification authority, in the fight against nuclear proliferation and in preventing the use of atomic, biological and chemical (ABC) weapons;

- the guaranteeing of the supply of fuel necessary to develop peaceful uses, such as an arrangement in which the IAEA would act as a guarantor for the supply of fissile material to civilian nuclear users at market rates for States who voluntarily forego the development of domestic uranium enrichment and plutonium separation facilities;

- the forging by the United Nations of a strategy of counter-terrorism which is respectful of human rights and the rule of law.

Parliament called for greater efforts by the EU Member States with a view to transforming armies into units suitable for deployment to peace operations, and to placing contingents on stand-by for UN purposes.

Freedom from want: a shared and balanced vision of a renewed UN development policy:

Parliament asked all actors to do their utmost to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Previous pledges from donor countries for the financing of development should be implemented – especially to achieve progress in the fight against HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis.

Parliament also endorsed the view that economic and social development and security and respect for human rights and safeguarding the environmentare intricately interdependent. Risk prevention through development can significantly reduce political, military or terrorist threats which derive from actual or perceived social inequalities, economic injustices and environmental degradations. Security issues are intimately linked to the achievement and consolidation of the MDGs.

Reformed institutions for greater representativeness and efficiency:

The necessary reform of the United Nations as a whole must by no means be limited or overshadowed by the reform of the Security Council and other institutional questions, although a rethinking of structures and working methods with a view to better representation and credibility is of the utmost importance. The composition of the Security Council should be changed in a way that takes into account the changed state of the international system as well as current geopolitical realities, by increasing the number of developing countries in the Council, by ensuring that its members are willing and able to act when action is needed, and by employing more effective and transparent working methods.

Parliament emphasised that an EU seat in the UN Security Council remains the aim for the EU as soon as the political, constitutional and legal conditions for such a seat are met.

It took note of the proposal to extend the composition of the UN Security Council by adding new seats for each regional group, including ‘Europe’. The appropriate solution would be to allocate an additional permanent seat to the EU. Parliament called on the Member States seriously to consider this proposal in order to enhance Europe’s influence in the world through a coherent and efficient Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). In any case, irrespective of the procedure for reform chosen, some of the additional seats for ‘Europe’ should be allocated to the EU as such. It called on the European Council to establish the appropriate mechanism to designate the EU Member States who will carry out their mandate as EU representatives in close coordination with the other EU Member States, the High Representative for the CFSP or the future Minister for Foreign Affairs, the Commission and the European Parliament until the conditions for an EU seat are met.

Parliament went on to call for significantly increased financial support from all member states for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, as well as the active involvement of the High Commissioner in the work and deliberations of the Security Council.

Other matters addressed by Parliament include the need to revitalise the General Assembly, and the upgrading of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), as well as the establishment of a permanent consultation mechanism between a reformed ECOSOC and the Bretton Woods Institutions as well as the World Trade Organisation (WTO). It felt that the reform proposals put forward by the RSG in the socio-economic field remain largely below actual needs for a body that brings together the key developed and developing countries to address the critical links between trade, finance, the environment and economic and social development.

Other suggestion include the following:

- the existing but dormant and obsolete Trusteeship Council be transformed into a Council for Failed States, which would be responsible, on behalf of the United Nations, for coordinating international cooperation in the case of failed States, and more widely for conflict prevention in failing States;

- the strengthening of international environmental governance through the upgrading of the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) into a United Nations specialised agency for the environment;

- member countries should provide UNESCO with enhanced budgetary resources in order to fulfil its important mandate;

- the establishment of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA) within the UN system, which would increase the democratic profile and internal democratic process of the organisation and allow world civil society to be directly associated in the decision-making process;

- the creation of a Democracy Fund aimed at encouraging, establishing and strengthening democracy worldwide, as called for in the RSG;

- strengthening the ‘UN Democracy Caucus’;

- encouraging the Council and the Commission actively to pursue the merging of their liaison offices and delegations into a common external EU delegation in each one of the following UN headquarters: New York, Geneva, Vienna and Nairobi;

Finally, Parliament called on its Bureau to commission a group of experts to draw up an initial blueprint detailing how the overall reform of the UN system might operate from the point of view both of the UN Charter and of the EU institutions.

Documents
2005/06/09
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2005/06/08
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2005/06/08
   EP - Debate in Parliament

Documents

Votes

B6-0328/2005 - Réforme ONU - am. 1/rév. #

2005/06/09 Outcome: +: 460, -: 95, 0: 26
DE GB PL FR ES HU IT BE EL PT NL SK AT CZ LT SE FI SI EE DK LU LV MT IE CY
Total
81
61
52
65
35
20
53
19
18
18
24
13
16
19
7
15
11
5
5
10
6
8
2
13
5
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
212

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
157

Slovakia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

1

Ireland PSE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Belgium NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

Austria NI

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

France IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
23

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Latvia UEN

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

B6-0328/2005 - Réformel ONU - par. 19/3 #

2005/06/09 Outcome: +: 461, -: 92, 0: 28
DE IT FR ES PL HU NL BE EL AT PT FI SK LV SE LT IE DK SI EE LU MT CY CZ GB
Total
81
55
63
35
51
20
26
20
18
15
18
11
13
9
15
7
13
11
5
5
5
2
5
19
59
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
212

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
157

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: UEN UEN
23

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

France GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

5

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
24

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
27

Italy IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

B6-0328/2005 - Réforme ONU - par. 20/2 #

2005/06/09 Outcome: +: 437, -: 108, 0: 29
DE IT FR ES HU BE PL NL PT AT EL SK SE FI LT LV LU IE DK SI EE MT CY CZ GB
Total
78
53
63
32
20
20
52
25
18
15
17
13
15
10
7
9
6
13
11
5
5
2
5
19
61
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
213

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
157

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
28

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: UEN UEN
23

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

3

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

France GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
27

Italy IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

2

France IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

B6-0328/2005 - Réforme ONU - par. 20/3 #

2005/06/09 Outcome: +: 418, -: 137, 0: 21
DE FR ES HU BE NL AT EL PT SK PL FI LV LT SE LU DK SI EE IT MT IE CY CZ GB
Total
83
62
32
20
20
26
15
17
18
13
50
11
9
7
15
6
11
5
5
54
2
13
5
17
60
icon: PSE PSE
154

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

1

Ireland PSE

1

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
211

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: NI NI
23

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: UEN UEN
21

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

France GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
27

France IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

B6-0328/2005 - Réforme ONU - par. 21/1 #

2005/06/09 Outcome: +: 450, -: 101, 0: 26
DE IT FR ES PL HU EL BE NL AT PT FI SK SE IE LT LV DK SI EE LU MT CY CZ GB
Total
82
53
62
33
52
20
18
19
26
14
18
11
12
15
13
7
9
11
5
5
5
2
5
19
61
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
212

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
155

Slovakia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
34

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3
icon: UEN UEN
22

Latvia UEN

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

France GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

5

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
28

Italy IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

2

France IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

B6-0328/2005 - Réforme ONU - par. 21/2 #

2005/06/09 Outcome: +: 375, -: 164, 0: 32
DE ES FR HU BE EL NL PT AT SK LV IE SE FI LT SI EE DK LU PL MT CY CZ GB IT
Total
80
35
62
20
20
18
24
18
14
13
9
13
15
11
6
5
5
11
4
52
2
5
18
60
51
icon: PSE PSE
152

Slovakia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

1

Czechia PSE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
213

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Spain ALDE

2

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
33

Spain Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2
icon: UEN UEN
23

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

France GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
28

France IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0328_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0328_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0237_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0237_EN.html
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050608&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20050608&type=CRE
events/2
date
2005-06-09T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0237_EN.html title: T6-0237/2005
summary
events/2
date
2005-06-09T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0237_EN.html title: T6-0237/2005
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 132-p2
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 123-p2
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-328&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0328_EN.html
docs/1
date
2005-06-09T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects
body
EP
docs/1
date
2005-06-09T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects
body
EP
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-237
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0237_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2005-06-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050608&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-06-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=11954&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-237 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0237/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
    docs
    • date: 2005-06-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-328&language=EN title: B6-0328/2005 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2005-06-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-237 title: T6-0237/2005 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2006:124E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 124 25.05.2006, p. 0421-0549 E summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution on reform of the United Nations, drafted by Armin LASCHET (EPP-ED, DE). It warmly welcomed the report of the Report of the High-level Panel (hereafter RHP), which made more than a hundred recommendations on change and the need to reform the UN in order to address challenges and threats ranging from poverty, infectious diseases, environmental damage and civil violence to terrorism, weapons of mass destruction and nuclear non‑proliferation. The Report by the Secretary-General (hereafter RSG) emphasised and endorses most of these recommendations. Collective security in the 21 st century: prevention, awareness and shared responsibility: Parliament strongly supported the underlying determination to achieve a reform of the United Nations in order to adapt the organisation to new world realities and make it more efficient, equitable, geared to the long term and accountable in providing collective security in the 21st century. It particularly welcomed the realistic approach of both reports, which, unlike previous reform proposals, adequately combine vision with concrete and practice-oriented measures for action. It recommended strengthening the United Nations system and institutions, since they constitute the most appropriate and only global institutions potentially able to foster and ensure collective security in a manner which is both legitimate and efficient. Parliament mentioned the following points with approval: - the strict limitation of the notion of self-defence and the use of force and responsibility to protect civilian populations. Such a definition should not prevent the Security Council from acting preventively since it is the only legitimate body for such action; - granting the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) an increased role and reinforced means, including the strengthening of its verification authority, in the fight against nuclear proliferation and in preventing the use of atomic, biological and chemical (ABC) weapons; - the guaranteeing of the supply of fuel necessary to develop peaceful uses, such as an arrangement in which the IAEA would act as a guarantor for the supply of fissile material to civilian nuclear users at market rates for States who voluntarily forego the development of domestic uranium enrichment and plutonium separation facilities; - the forging by the United Nations of a strategy of counter-terrorism which is respectful of human rights and the rule of law. Parliament called for greater efforts by the EU Member States with a view to transforming armies into units suitable for deployment to peace operations, and to placing contingents on stand-by for UN purposes. Freedom from want: a shared and balanced vision of a renewed UN development policy: Parliament asked all actors to do their utmost to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Previous pledges from donor countries for the financing of development should be implemented – especially to achieve progress in the fight against HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis. Parliament also endorsed the view that economic and social development and security and respect for human rights and safeguarding the environmentare intricately interdependent. Risk prevention through development can significantly reduce political, military or terrorist threats which derive from actual or perceived social inequalities, economic injustices and environmental degradations. Security issues are intimately linked to the achievement and consolidation of the MDGs. Reformed institutions for greater representativeness and efficiency: The necessary reform of the United Nations as a whole must by no means be limited or overshadowed by the reform of the Security Council and other institutional questions, although a rethinking of structures and working methods with a view to better representation and credibility is of the utmost importance. The composition of the Security Council should be changed in a way that takes into account the changed state of the international system as well as current geopolitical realities, by increasing the number of developing countries in the Council, by ensuring that its members are willing and able to act when action is needed, and by employing more effective and transparent working methods. Parliament emphasised that an EU seat in the UN Security Council remains the aim for the EU as soon as the political, constitutional and legal conditions for such a seat are met. It took note of the proposal to extend the composition of the UN Security Council by adding new seats for each regional group, including ‘Europe’. The appropriate solution would be to allocate an additional permanent seat to the EU. Parliament called on the Member States seriously to consider this proposal in order to enhance Europe’s influence in the world through a coherent and efficient Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). In any case, irrespective of the procedure for reform chosen, some of the additional seats for ‘Europe’ should be allocated to the EU as such. It called on the European Council to establish the appropriate mechanism to designate the EU Member States who will carry out their mandate as EU representatives in close coordination with the other EU Member States, the High Representative for the CFSP or the future Minister for Foreign Affairs, the Commission and the European Parliament until the conditions for an EU seat are met. Parliament went on to call for significantly increased financial support from all member states for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, as well as the active involvement of the High Commissioner in the work and deliberations of the Security Council. Other matters addressed by Parliament include the need to revitalise the General Assembly, and the upgrading of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), as well as the establishment of a permanent consultation mechanism between a reformed ECOSOC and the Bretton Woods Institutions as well as the World Trade Organisation (WTO). It felt that the reform proposals put forward by the RSG in the socio-economic field remain largely below actual needs for a body that brings together the key developed and developing countries to address the critical links between trade, finance, the environment and economic and social development. Other suggestion include the following: - the existing but dormant and obsolete Trusteeship Council be transformed into a Council for Failed States, which would be responsible, on behalf of the United Nations, for coordinating international cooperation in the case of failed States, and more widely for conflict prevention in failing States; - the strengthening of international environmental governance through the upgrading of the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) into a United Nations specialised agency for the environment; - member countries should provide UNESCO with enhanced budgetary resources in order to fulfil its important mandate; - the establishment of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA) within the UN system, which would increase the democratic profile and internal democratic process of the organisation and allow world civil society to be directly associated in the decision-making process; - the creation of a Democracy Fund aimed at encouraging, establishing and strengthening democracy worldwide, as called for in the RSG; - strengthening the ‘UN Democracy Caucus’; - encouraging the Council and the Commission actively to pursue the merging of their liaison offices and delegations into a common external EU delegation in each one of the following UN headquarters: New York, Geneva, Vienna and Nairobi; Finally, Parliament called on its Bureau to commission a group of experts to draw up an initial blueprint detailing how the overall reform of the UN system might operate from the point of view both of the UN Charter and of the EU institutions. type: Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects body: EP
    events
    • date: 2005-06-08T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050608&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2005-06-09T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=11954&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2005-06-09T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-237 title: T6-0237/2005 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution on reform of the United Nations, drafted by Armin LASCHET (EPP-ED, DE). It warmly welcomed the report of the Report of the High-level Panel (hereafter RHP), which made more than a hundred recommendations on change and the need to reform the UN in order to address challenges and threats ranging from poverty, infectious diseases, environmental damage and civil violence to terrorism, weapons of mass destruction and nuclear non‑proliferation. The Report by the Secretary-General (hereafter RSG) emphasised and endorses most of these recommendations. Collective security in the 21 st century: prevention, awareness and shared responsibility: Parliament strongly supported the underlying determination to achieve a reform of the United Nations in order to adapt the organisation to new world realities and make it more efficient, equitable, geared to the long term and accountable in providing collective security in the 21st century. It particularly welcomed the realistic approach of both reports, which, unlike previous reform proposals, adequately combine vision with concrete and practice-oriented measures for action. It recommended strengthening the United Nations system and institutions, since they constitute the most appropriate and only global institutions potentially able to foster and ensure collective security in a manner which is both legitimate and efficient. Parliament mentioned the following points with approval: - the strict limitation of the notion of self-defence and the use of force and responsibility to protect civilian populations. Such a definition should not prevent the Security Council from acting preventively since it is the only legitimate body for such action; - granting the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) an increased role and reinforced means, including the strengthening of its verification authority, in the fight against nuclear proliferation and in preventing the use of atomic, biological and chemical (ABC) weapons; - the guaranteeing of the supply of fuel necessary to develop peaceful uses, such as an arrangement in which the IAEA would act as a guarantor for the supply of fissile material to civilian nuclear users at market rates for States who voluntarily forego the development of domestic uranium enrichment and plutonium separation facilities; - the forging by the United Nations of a strategy of counter-terrorism which is respectful of human rights and the rule of law. Parliament called for greater efforts by the EU Member States with a view to transforming armies into units suitable for deployment to peace operations, and to placing contingents on stand-by for UN purposes. Freedom from want: a shared and balanced vision of a renewed UN development policy: Parliament asked all actors to do their utmost to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Previous pledges from donor countries for the financing of development should be implemented – especially to achieve progress in the fight against HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis. Parliament also endorsed the view that economic and social development and security and respect for human rights and safeguarding the environmentare intricately interdependent. Risk prevention through development can significantly reduce political, military or terrorist threats which derive from actual or perceived social inequalities, economic injustices and environmental degradations. Security issues are intimately linked to the achievement and consolidation of the MDGs. Reformed institutions for greater representativeness and efficiency: The necessary reform of the United Nations as a whole must by no means be limited or overshadowed by the reform of the Security Council and other institutional questions, although a rethinking of structures and working methods with a view to better representation and credibility is of the utmost importance. The composition of the Security Council should be changed in a way that takes into account the changed state of the international system as well as current geopolitical realities, by increasing the number of developing countries in the Council, by ensuring that its members are willing and able to act when action is needed, and by employing more effective and transparent working methods. Parliament emphasised that an EU seat in the UN Security Council remains the aim for the EU as soon as the political, constitutional and legal conditions for such a seat are met. It took note of the proposal to extend the composition of the UN Security Council by adding new seats for each regional group, including ‘Europe’. The appropriate solution would be to allocate an additional permanent seat to the EU. Parliament called on the Member States seriously to consider this proposal in order to enhance Europe’s influence in the world through a coherent and efficient Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). In any case, irrespective of the procedure for reform chosen, some of the additional seats for ‘Europe’ should be allocated to the EU as such. It called on the European Council to establish the appropriate mechanism to designate the EU Member States who will carry out their mandate as EU representatives in close coordination with the other EU Member States, the High Representative for the CFSP or the future Minister for Foreign Affairs, the Commission and the European Parliament until the conditions for an EU seat are met. Parliament went on to call for significantly increased financial support from all member states for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, as well as the active involvement of the High Commissioner in the work and deliberations of the Security Council. Other matters addressed by Parliament include the need to revitalise the General Assembly, and the upgrading of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), as well as the establishment of a permanent consultation mechanism between a reformed ECOSOC and the Bretton Woods Institutions as well as the World Trade Organisation (WTO). It felt that the reform proposals put forward by the RSG in the socio-economic field remain largely below actual needs for a body that brings together the key developed and developing countries to address the critical links between trade, finance, the environment and economic and social development. Other suggestion include the following: - the existing but dormant and obsolete Trusteeship Council be transformed into a Council for Failed States, which would be responsible, on behalf of the United Nations, for coordinating international cooperation in the case of failed States, and more widely for conflict prevention in failing States; - the strengthening of international environmental governance through the upgrading of the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) into a United Nations specialised agency for the environment; - member countries should provide UNESCO with enhanced budgetary resources in order to fulfil its important mandate; - the establishment of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA) within the UN system, which would increase the democratic profile and internal democratic process of the organisation and allow world civil society to be directly associated in the decision-making process; - the creation of a Democracy Fund aimed at encouraging, establishing and strengthening democracy worldwide, as called for in the RSG; - strengthening the ‘UN Democracy Caucus’; - encouraging the Council and the Commission actively to pursue the merging of their liaison offices and delegations into a common external EU delegation in each one of the following UN headquarters: New York, Geneva, Vienna and Nairobi; Finally, Parliament called on its Bureau to commission a group of experts to draw up an initial blueprint detailing how the overall reform of the UN system might operate from the point of view both of the UN Charter and of the EU institutions.
    • date: 2005-06-09T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
      procedure/legal_basis/0
      Rules of Procedure EP 123-p2
      procedure/legal_basis/0
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 123-p2
      procedure/subject
      Old
      • 6.40.13 Relations with/in the context of international organisations: UN, OSCE, OECD, Council of Europe, EBRD
      New
      6.40.13
      Relations with/in the context of international organisations: UN, OSCE, OECD, Council of Europe, EBRD
      procedure/subtype
      Old
      Resolution on statements
      New
      Resolution on statement
      activities
      • date: 2005-06-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050608&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
      • date: 2005-06-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=11954&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-237 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0237/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
      committees
        links
        other
          procedure
          reference
          2004/2620(RSP)
          title
          Resolution on the reform of the United Nations
          legal_basis
          Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 123-p2
          stage_reached
          Procedure completed
          subtype
          Resolution on statements
          type
          RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
          subject
          6.40.13 Relations with/in the context of international organisations: UN, OSCE, OECD, Council of Europe, EBRD