BETA


2005/0159(COD) External borders: recognition by new Member States and Schengen States of residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein as equivalent to their national visas for the purpose of transit (Regulation (EC) No 539/2001)

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead LIBE CASHMAN Michael (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion AFET
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 062

Events

2006/06/20
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to introduce a simplified regime for permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territories, based on unilateral recognition of documents.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 896/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by the Member States of certain residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territory.

BACKGROUND: the current Schengen “acquis” establishes the principle of mutual recognition of uniform visas, of long term visas and of residence permits issued by Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis for transit and short stay purposes. This is a basic principle underpinning the creation of the area without internal borders. It enables a third country national holder of certain documents issued by a Member State fully participating in the Schengen area to enter and/or circulate freely within the common space without being subject to any additional requirement.

As regards residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein, the existing Schengen acquis does not allow Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis to recognise these for transit purposes into the Schengen territory.

CONTENT : under the terms and conditions of the Schengen Agreement (encapsulated in Regulation 539/2001), visas issued by one Schengen Member State are deemed valid for crossing the external borders of another Schengen Member State, both for short stay and transitory purposes. In addition, the current Schengen provisions foresee a system of mutual recognition of long-term visas and residence permits issued by Member States complying with the Schengen acquis.

Since the accession of the new Member States on 1 May 2004, a number of gaps in applying the provisions outlined above had arisen, which required urgent attention and which equally applied to the issuing of visas by Switzerland and Liechtenstein. This Council Decision aims to fill the gaps.

To put it into context, prior to becoming new EU Member States, it was agreed that the acceding countries would apply the so-called ‘Schengen two phase process’. This process, set out in the Act of Accession, stated that from the moment of accession, the new Member States shall apply the provisions of the Schengen Agreement as outlined in Regulation 539/2001/EC, - whilst simultaneously issuing their own national visas until such a time that an EU Council Decision authorising their full integration into the Schengen area has been agreed upon.

The compromise solution gave rise to a number of legal uncertainties. It did not, for example, foresee the equivalence between residence permits and visas. The result was that new Member States were obliged to issue national visas for entry into and transit through their territory to third country national, even if the persons concerned were holders of a Schengen residence permit or visa – or else were holders of national long term visas issued by a Schengen state. For many new Member States, this placed a considerable administrative burden on their embassies and consular services. Further, given that persons holding a Schengen visa, are subject to rigorous controls by the Schengen Member State prior to the issuance of their visa, all relevant security concerns had, effectively, already been addressed.

The complexity of the situation was particularly pertinent to nationals of both Liechtenstein and Switzerland, who for geographic reasons, were adversely affected by the need for transit visas. The result was that Swiss and Liechtenstein nationals needed to apply for a visa when transiting the territories of the new EU Member States. This became particularly problematic for holiday makers who often just needed to transit the territory of a new Member State, without necessarily wishing to stay in that territory, but who nevertheless needed to apply for visas. According to a survey conducted in 2003 by Switzerland’s Central Register of Foreign Nationals, 514 250 persons were affected by the transit visa requirements, at the height of the holiday period.

This Decision specifically concerns Switzerland and Liechtenstein. The second Decision ( COD/2005/0158 ) is addressed to the new Member States.

This Decision establishes a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by Member States of residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein to third-country nationals subject to a visa obligation pursuant to Regulation 539/2001/EC as equivalent to their uniform or national visas for the purpose of transit . The implementation of this Decision will not affect the checks to be carried out on persons at the external borders in compliance with Regulation 562/2006/EC.

Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis shall unilaterally recognise the residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein which are listed in the Annex to the Decision.

New Member States which apply Decision 895/2006/EC (see COD/2005/0158 ) may unilaterally recognise the residence permits listed in the Annex to this Decision as equivalent to their national transit visas until the date to be determined by the Council.

The duration of the transit of the third-country national through the territory of the Member State(s) shall not exceed 5 days .

Terroritial measures : this Decision is addressed to the Member States. Iceland and Norway will also be associated in this Decision.

The United Kingdom, Ireland and Denmark shall not participate in the adoption of the present Decision.

Denmark could however decide, within a period of 6 months after the date of adoption of this Decision, to implement it into its national law.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: this Decision shall enter into force on 10 July 2006. It shall apply until the date on which the provisions of Article 21 of the Schengen Convention take effect for Switzerland and Liechtenstein pursuant to Article 15 of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis. Any new Member State that decides to apply this Decision must notify the Commission by 1 August 2006.

2006/06/14
   CSL - Draft final act
Documents
2006/06/14
   CSL - Final act signed
2006/06/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/06/01
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
2006/06/01
   CSL - Council Meeting
2006/05/11
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/04/06
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2006/04/06
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted the report by Michael CASHMAN (PES, UK) by 403 votes for, 8 against and 31 abstentions, on the proposed decision establishing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by the Member States of certain residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territory. (Please refer to the summary dated 06/03/2006).

Documents
2006/03/09
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2006/03/09
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Documents
2006/03/06
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
Details

The committee adopted the report by Michael CASHMAN (PES, UK) on the proposed decision establishing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by the Member States of certain residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territory. MEPs adopted a number of technical amendments - under the 1st reading of the codecision procedure - adding various legislative references to the recitals and making it clear that the proposal is transitional in nature and will apply until the provisions of Article 21 of the Schengen Convention are put into effect for Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

2006/02/20
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2006/01/09
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2005/10/04
   EP - CASHMAN Michael (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2005/09/06
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2005/08/22
   EC - Legislative proposal
Details

PURPOSE: To introduce a simplified regime for permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territories, based on unilateral recognition of documents.

PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and the Council

CONTENT: Under the terms and conditions of the Schengen Agreement (encapsulated in Regulation 539/2001), visas issued by one Schengen Member State are deemed valid for crossing the external borders of another Schengen Member State, both for short stay and transitory purposes. In addition, the current Schengen provisions foresee a system of mutual recognition of long-term visas and residence permits issued by Member States complying with the Schengen acquis .

Since the accession of the new Member States on 1 May 2004, a number of gaps in applying the provisions outlined above have arisen, which require urgent attention and which equally apply to the issuing of visas by Switzerland and Liechtenstein. It is these gaps, which the Commission is trying to plug, and which explains the Commission’s need to present the attached proposal for a Decision.

To put it into context, prior to becoming new EU Member States, it was agreed that the acceding countries would apply the so-called ‘Schengen two phase process’. This process, set out in the Act of Accession, states that from the moment of accession, the new Member States shall apply the provisions of the Schengen Agreement as outlined in Regulation 539/2001, - whilst simultaneously issuing their own national visas until such a time that an EU Council Decision authorising their full integration into the Schengen area has been agreed upon.

The existing, compromise solution, gives rise to a number of legal uncertainties. It does not, for example, foresee the equivalence between residence permits and visas. The result being that new Member States are obliged to issue national visas for entry into and transit through their territory to third country national, even if the persons concerned are holders of a Schengen residence permit or visa – or else are holders of national long term visas issued by a Schengen state. For many new Member States, this places a considerable administrative burden on their embassies and consular services. Further, given that persons holding a Schengen visa, are subject to rigorous controls by the Schengen Member State prior to the issuance of their visa, all relevant security concerns have, effectively, already been addressed.

The complexity of the current situation is particularly pertinent to nationals of both Liechtenstein and Switzerland, who for geographic reasons, are adversely affected by the need for transit visas. The result being that Swiss and Liechtenstein nationals need to apply for a visa when transiting the territories of the new EU Member States. This becomes particularly problematic for holiday makers who often just need to transit the territory of a new Member State, without necessarily wishing to stay in that territory, but who nevertheless need to apply for visas. According to a survey conducted in 2003 by Switzerland’s Central Register of Foreign Nationals, 514 250 persons were affected by the transit visa requirements, at the height of the holiday period.

In order to address this issue, the Swiss authorities are currently adopting a unilateral recognition of resident permits whereby holders of residence permits issued by a European Union Member State are exempted from visa requirements. It covers visas for short stay and transit purposes. Looking to the longer term, the EU and Switzerland are in the process of ratifying an Agreement on the Schengen acquis . The Commission acknowledges, however, that this will take some time to come into force and an interim solution needs to be found. Hence, the presentation of two related Decisions.

The first proposal concerns this Decision, which is specifically addressed to Switzerland and Liechtenstein. The second proposal is for a Council Decision (2005/0158 COD), addressed to the new Member States, (here meaning: the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia).

The proposed Decision addressed to Switzerland and Liechtenstein, seeks to simplify procedures for controlling persons at external borders. It aims to do so by setting up a system, for a transitional period only, whereby new Member States agree to adopt common rules, which unilaterally recognise visa documents as equivalent to their national visas. The Commission is also proposing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the principle of unilateral equivalence. Specifically speaking the Decision proposes the following provisions:

- A simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on unilateral recognition of residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein will apply. It will be limited to the issuing of visas for transit purposes only, without affecting the possibility of Member States to issue visas for short-term stay.

- The new EU Member States may optionally apply the same approach when dealing with nationals from Switzerland and Liechtenstein, until an implementing Decision has been approved, which fully integrates them into the Schengen area.

2005/08/21
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: To introduce a simplified regime for permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territories, based on unilateral recognition of documents.

PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and the Council

CONTENT: Under the terms and conditions of the Schengen Agreement (encapsulated in Regulation 539/2001), visas issued by one Schengen Member State are deemed valid for crossing the external borders of another Schengen Member State, both for short stay and transitory purposes. In addition, the current Schengen provisions foresee a system of mutual recognition of long-term visas and residence permits issued by Member States complying with the Schengen acquis .

Since the accession of the new Member States on 1 May 2004, a number of gaps in applying the provisions outlined above have arisen, which require urgent attention and which equally apply to the issuing of visas by Switzerland and Liechtenstein. It is these gaps, which the Commission is trying to plug, and which explains the Commission’s need to present the attached proposal for a Decision.

To put it into context, prior to becoming new EU Member States, it was agreed that the acceding countries would apply the so-called ‘Schengen two phase process’. This process, set out in the Act of Accession, states that from the moment of accession, the new Member States shall apply the provisions of the Schengen Agreement as outlined in Regulation 539/2001, - whilst simultaneously issuing their own national visas until such a time that an EU Council Decision authorising their full integration into the Schengen area has been agreed upon.

The existing, compromise solution, gives rise to a number of legal uncertainties. It does not, for example, foresee the equivalence between residence permits and visas. The result being that new Member States are obliged to issue national visas for entry into and transit through their territory to third country national, even if the persons concerned are holders of a Schengen residence permit or visa – or else are holders of national long term visas issued by a Schengen state. For many new Member States, this places a considerable administrative burden on their embassies and consular services. Further, given that persons holding a Schengen visa, are subject to rigorous controls by the Schengen Member State prior to the issuance of their visa, all relevant security concerns have, effectively, already been addressed.

The complexity of the current situation is particularly pertinent to nationals of both Liechtenstein and Switzerland, who for geographic reasons, are adversely affected by the need for transit visas. The result being that Swiss and Liechtenstein nationals need to apply for a visa when transiting the territories of the new EU Member States. This becomes particularly problematic for holiday makers who often just need to transit the territory of a new Member State, without necessarily wishing to stay in that territory, but who nevertheless need to apply for visas. According to a survey conducted in 2003 by Switzerland’s Central Register of Foreign Nationals, 514 250 persons were affected by the transit visa requirements, at the height of the holiday period.

In order to address this issue, the Swiss authorities are currently adopting a unilateral recognition of resident permits whereby holders of residence permits issued by a European Union Member State are exempted from visa requirements. It covers visas for short stay and transit purposes. Looking to the longer term, the EU and Switzerland are in the process of ratifying an Agreement on the Schengen acquis . The Commission acknowledges, however, that this will take some time to come into force and an interim solution needs to be found. Hence, the presentation of two related Decisions.

The first proposal concerns this Decision, which is specifically addressed to Switzerland and Liechtenstein. The second proposal is for a Council Decision (2005/0158 COD), addressed to the new Member States, (here meaning: the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia).

The proposed Decision addressed to Switzerland and Liechtenstein, seeks to simplify procedures for controlling persons at external borders. It aims to do so by setting up a system, for a transitional period only, whereby new Member States agree to adopt common rules, which unilaterally recognise visa documents as equivalent to their national visas. The Commission is also proposing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the principle of unilateral equivalence. Specifically speaking the Decision proposes the following provisions:

- A simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on unilateral recognition of residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein will apply. It will be limited to the issuing of visas for transit purposes only, without affecting the possibility of Member States to issue visas for short-term stay.

- The new EU Member States may optionally apply the same approach when dealing with nationals from Switzerland and Liechtenstein, until an implementing Decision has been approved, which fully integrates them into the Schengen area.

Documents

Votes

Rapport Cashman A6-0060/2006 - résolution #

2006/04/06 Outcome: +: 403, 0: 31, -: 8
DE FR ES PL GB NL IT CZ BE EL SE HU AT PT DK FI IE SK LT EE SI MT LU LV CY
Total
60
56
33
45
44
19
17
17
16
16
14
13
15
12
11
10
8
8
7
4
4
4
4
3
2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
172

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

1
icon: PSE PSE
124

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
44

Italy ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
25

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: UEN UEN
15

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Czechia NI

1

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
16

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2005-08-22T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
events/0/date
Old
2005-08-22T00:00:00
New
2005-08-21T00:00:00
events/9/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2006:167:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:167:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE367.821
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE367.821
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE368.098
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE368.098
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0060_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0060_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4574&j=0&l=en
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0381/COM_COM(2005)0381_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0381/COM_COM(2005)0381_EN.pdf
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/3
date
2006-03-09T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0060_EN.html title: A6-0060/2006
events/3
date
2006-03-09T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0060_EN.html title: A6-0060/2006
events/5
date
2006-04-06T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0130_EN.html title: T6-0130/2006
summary
The European Parliament adopted the report by Michael CASHMAN (PES, UK) by 403 votes for, 8 against and 31 abstentions, on the proposed decision establishing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by the Member States of certain residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territory. (Please refer to the summary dated 06/03/2006).
events/5
date
2006-04-06T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0130_EN.html title: T6-0130/2006
summary
The European Parliament adopted the report by Michael CASHMAN (PES, UK) by 403 votes for, 8 against and 31 abstentions, on the proposed decision establishing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by the Member States of certain residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territory. (Please refer to the summary dated 06/03/2006).
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: CASHMAN Michael date: 2005-10-04T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2005-10-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CASHMAN Michael group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-60&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0060_EN.html
docs/3/body
EC
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0381/COM_COM(2005)0381_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0381/COM_COM(2005)0381_EN.pdf
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-60&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0060_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-130
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0130_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2005-08-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0381/COM_COM(2005)0381_EN.pdf title: COM(2005)0381 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52005PC0381(02):EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2005-09-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2005-10-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: CASHMAN Michael
  • date: 2006-03-06T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2005-10-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: CASHMAN Michael type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-03-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-60&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0060/2006 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2005-10-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: CASHMAN Michael type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-04-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4574&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-130 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0130/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-06-01T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2732
  • date: 2006-06-01T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
  • date: 2006-06-14T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2006-06-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2006-06-20T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32006D0896 title: Decision 2006/896 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2006:167:TOC title: OJ L 167 20.06.2006, p. 0008-0013
commission
  • body: EC dg: Justice and Consumers commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2005-10-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CASHMAN Michael group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
LIBE
date
2005-10-04T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: PSE name: CASHMAN Michael
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2732 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2732*&MEET_DATE=01/06/2006 date: 2006-06-01T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2006-01-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE367.821 title: PE367.821 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2006-02-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE368.098 title: PE368.098 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2006-03-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-60&language=EN title: A6-0060/2006 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-05-11T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4574&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)2095 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2006-06-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=3610%2F06&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 03610/2/2006 type: Draft final act body: CSL
events
  • date: 2005-08-22T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0381/COM_COM(2005)0381_EN.pdf title: COM(2005)0381 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2005&nu_doc=381 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: To introduce a simplified regime for permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territories, based on unilateral recognition of documents. PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and the Council CONTENT: Under the terms and conditions of the Schengen Agreement (encapsulated in Regulation 539/2001), visas issued by one Schengen Member State are deemed valid for crossing the external borders of another Schengen Member State, both for short stay and transitory purposes. In addition, the current Schengen provisions foresee a system of mutual recognition of long-term visas and residence permits issued by Member States complying with the Schengen acquis . Since the accession of the new Member States on 1 May 2004, a number of gaps in applying the provisions outlined above have arisen, which require urgent attention and which equally apply to the issuing of visas by Switzerland and Liechtenstein. It is these gaps, which the Commission is trying to plug, and which explains the Commission’s need to present the attached proposal for a Decision. To put it into context, prior to becoming new EU Member States, it was agreed that the acceding countries would apply the so-called ‘Schengen two phase process’. This process, set out in the Act of Accession, states that from the moment of accession, the new Member States shall apply the provisions of the Schengen Agreement as outlined in Regulation 539/2001, - whilst simultaneously issuing their own national visas until such a time that an EU Council Decision authorising their full integration into the Schengen area has been agreed upon. The existing, compromise solution, gives rise to a number of legal uncertainties. It does not, for example, foresee the equivalence between residence permits and visas. The result being that new Member States are obliged to issue national visas for entry into and transit through their territory to third country national, even if the persons concerned are holders of a Schengen residence permit or visa – or else are holders of national long term visas issued by a Schengen state. For many new Member States, this places a considerable administrative burden on their embassies and consular services. Further, given that persons holding a Schengen visa, are subject to rigorous controls by the Schengen Member State prior to the issuance of their visa, all relevant security concerns have, effectively, already been addressed. The complexity of the current situation is particularly pertinent to nationals of both Liechtenstein and Switzerland, who for geographic reasons, are adversely affected by the need for transit visas. The result being that Swiss and Liechtenstein nationals need to apply for a visa when transiting the territories of the new EU Member States. This becomes particularly problematic for holiday makers who often just need to transit the territory of a new Member State, without necessarily wishing to stay in that territory, but who nevertheless need to apply for visas. According to a survey conducted in 2003 by Switzerland’s Central Register of Foreign Nationals, 514 250 persons were affected by the transit visa requirements, at the height of the holiday period. In order to address this issue, the Swiss authorities are currently adopting a unilateral recognition of resident permits whereby holders of residence permits issued by a European Union Member State are exempted from visa requirements. It covers visas for short stay and transit purposes. Looking to the longer term, the EU and Switzerland are in the process of ratifying an Agreement on the Schengen acquis . The Commission acknowledges, however, that this will take some time to come into force and an interim solution needs to be found. Hence, the presentation of two related Decisions. The first proposal concerns this Decision, which is specifically addressed to Switzerland and Liechtenstein. The second proposal is for a Council Decision (2005/0158 COD), addressed to the new Member States, (here meaning: the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia). The proposed Decision addressed to Switzerland and Liechtenstein, seeks to simplify procedures for controlling persons at external borders. It aims to do so by setting up a system, for a transitional period only, whereby new Member States agree to adopt common rules, which unilaterally recognise visa documents as equivalent to their national visas. The Commission is also proposing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the principle of unilateral equivalence. Specifically speaking the Decision proposes the following provisions: - A simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on unilateral recognition of residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein will apply. It will be limited to the issuing of visas for transit purposes only, without affecting the possibility of Member States to issue visas for short-term stay. - The new EU Member States may optionally apply the same approach when dealing with nationals from Switzerland and Liechtenstein, until an implementing Decision has been approved, which fully integrates them into the Schengen area.
  • date: 2005-09-06T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-03-06T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the report by Michael CASHMAN (PES, UK) on the proposed decision establishing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by the Member States of certain residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territory. MEPs adopted a number of technical amendments - under the 1st reading of the codecision procedure - adding various legislative references to the recitals and making it clear that the proposal is transitional in nature and will apply until the provisions of Article 21 of the Schengen Convention are put into effect for Switzerland and Liechtenstein.
  • date: 2006-03-09T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-60&language=EN title: A6-0060/2006
  • date: 2006-04-06T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4574&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-04-06T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-130 title: T6-0130/2006 summary: The European Parliament adopted the report by Michael CASHMAN (PES, UK) by 403 votes for, 8 against and 31 abstentions, on the proposed decision establishing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by the Member States of certain residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territory. (Please refer to the summary dated 06/03/2006).
  • date: 2006-06-01T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2006-06-14T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL
  • date: 2006-06-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2006-06-20T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to introduce a simplified regime for permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territories, based on unilateral recognition of documents. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 896/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by the Member States of certain residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territory. BACKGROUND: the current Schengen “acquis” establishes the principle of mutual recognition of uniform visas, of long term visas and of residence permits issued by Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis for transit and short stay purposes. This is a basic principle underpinning the creation of the area without internal borders. It enables a third country national holder of certain documents issued by a Member State fully participating in the Schengen area to enter and/or circulate freely within the common space without being subject to any additional requirement. As regards residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein, the existing Schengen acquis does not allow Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis to recognise these for transit purposes into the Schengen territory. CONTENT : under the terms and conditions of the Schengen Agreement (encapsulated in Regulation 539/2001), visas issued by one Schengen Member State are deemed valid for crossing the external borders of another Schengen Member State, both for short stay and transitory purposes. In addition, the current Schengen provisions foresee a system of mutual recognition of long-term visas and residence permits issued by Member States complying with the Schengen acquis. Since the accession of the new Member States on 1 May 2004, a number of gaps in applying the provisions outlined above had arisen, which required urgent attention and which equally applied to the issuing of visas by Switzerland and Liechtenstein. This Council Decision aims to fill the gaps. To put it into context, prior to becoming new EU Member States, it was agreed that the acceding countries would apply the so-called ‘Schengen two phase process’. This process, set out in the Act of Accession, stated that from the moment of accession, the new Member States shall apply the provisions of the Schengen Agreement as outlined in Regulation 539/2001/EC, - whilst simultaneously issuing their own national visas until such a time that an EU Council Decision authorising their full integration into the Schengen area has been agreed upon. The compromise solution gave rise to a number of legal uncertainties. It did not, for example, foresee the equivalence between residence permits and visas. The result was that new Member States were obliged to issue national visas for entry into and transit through their territory to third country national, even if the persons concerned were holders of a Schengen residence permit or visa – or else were holders of national long term visas issued by a Schengen state. For many new Member States, this placed a considerable administrative burden on their embassies and consular services. Further, given that persons holding a Schengen visa, are subject to rigorous controls by the Schengen Member State prior to the issuance of their visa, all relevant security concerns had, effectively, already been addressed. The complexity of the situation was particularly pertinent to nationals of both Liechtenstein and Switzerland, who for geographic reasons, were adversely affected by the need for transit visas. The result was that Swiss and Liechtenstein nationals needed to apply for a visa when transiting the territories of the new EU Member States. This became particularly problematic for holiday makers who often just needed to transit the territory of a new Member State, without necessarily wishing to stay in that territory, but who nevertheless needed to apply for visas. According to a survey conducted in 2003 by Switzerland’s Central Register of Foreign Nationals, 514 250 persons were affected by the transit visa requirements, at the height of the holiday period. This Decision specifically concerns Switzerland and Liechtenstein. The second Decision ( COD/2005/0158 ) is addressed to the new Member States. This Decision establishes a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by Member States of residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein to third-country nationals subject to a visa obligation pursuant to Regulation 539/2001/EC as equivalent to their uniform or national visas for the purpose of transit . The implementation of this Decision will not affect the checks to be carried out on persons at the external borders in compliance with Regulation 562/2006/EC. Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis shall unilaterally recognise the residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein which are listed in the Annex to the Decision. New Member States which apply Decision 895/2006/EC (see COD/2005/0158 ) may unilaterally recognise the residence permits listed in the Annex to this Decision as equivalent to their national transit visas until the date to be determined by the Council. The duration of the transit of the third-country national through the territory of the Member State(s) shall not exceed 5 days . Terroritial measures : this Decision is addressed to the Member States. Iceland and Norway will also be associated in this Decision. The United Kingdom, Ireland and Denmark shall not participate in the adoption of the present Decision. Denmark could however decide, within a period of 6 months after the date of adoption of this Decision, to implement it into its national law. ENTRY INTO FORCE: this Decision shall enter into force on 10 July 2006. It shall apply until the date on which the provisions of Article 21 of the Schengen Convention take effect for Switzerland and Liechtenstein pursuant to Article 15 of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis. Any new Member State that decides to apply this Decision must notify the Commission by 1 August 2006. docs: title: Decision 2006/896 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32006D0896 title: OJ L 167 20.06.2006, p. 0008-0013 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2006:167:TOC
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
LIBE/6/30002
New
  • LIBE/6/30002
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32006D0896
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32006D0896
procedure/instrument
Old
Decision
New
  • Decision
  • Amended by 2007/0186(COD)
procedure/subject
Old
  • 7.10.04 External borders crossing and controls, visas
New
7.10.04
External borders crossing and controls, visas
procedure/summary
  • Amended by
activities/9/docs/1/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:167:SOM:EN:HTML
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2006:167:TOC
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
activities
  • date: 2005-08-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0381/COM_COM(2005)0381_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52005PC0381(02):EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2005)0381 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice
  • date: 2005-09-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2005-10-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: CASHMAN Michael
  • date: 2006-03-06T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2005-10-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: CASHMAN Michael type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-03-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-60&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0060/2006 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2005-10-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: CASHMAN Michael type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-04-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4574&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-130 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0130/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-06-01T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2732
  • date: 2006-06-01T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
  • date: 2006-06-14T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2006-06-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2006-06-20T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32006D0896 title: Decision 2006/896 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:167:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ L 167 20.06.2006, p. 0008-0013
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2005-10-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: CASHMAN Michael
links
European Commission
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
LIBE/6/30002
geographical_area
reference
2005/0159(COD)
instrument
Decision
legal_basis
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 062
stage_reached
Procedure completed
summary
Amended by
subtype
Legislation
title
External borders: recognition by new Member States and Schengen States of residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein as equivalent to their national visas for the purpose of transit (Regulation (EC) No 539/2001)
type
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
final
subject
7.10.04 External borders crossing and controls, visas