Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | SCHLYTER Carl ( Verts/ALE) | |
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 095
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 095Subjects
- 3.40.01 Chemical industry, fertilizers, plastics
- 3.40.10 Textile and clothing industry, leathers
- 3.40.11 Precision engineering, optics, photography, medical
- 3.70.01 Protection of natural resources: fauna, flora, nature, wildlife, countryside; biodiversity
- 3.70.13 Dangerous substances, toxic and radioactive wastes (storage, transport)
- 4.20 Public health
- 4.60.04.02 Consumer security
Events
PURPOSE: to place restrictions on the marketing and use of perfluorooctane sulfonates and to amend Council Directive 76/769/EEC accordingly.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Directive 2006/122/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council amending for the 30 th time Council Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (perfluorooctane sulfonates).
BACKGROUND: an OECD assessment of perfluorooctane sulfonates (PFOs) concluded that they are persistent, bio accumulative and toxic to mammalian species. The EU’s Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER) formed similar conclusions to that of the OECD and noted that PFOs could be considered persistent organic pollutants (POPs). As a result the SCHER noted that:
- measures might be needed to avoid the re-occurrence of former PFO uses;
- on-going critical uses in the aviation industry, the semiconductor industry and the photographic industry did not appear to pose a relevant risk – on condition that exposures be minimised;
- that alternatives to PFOs in fire-fighting foam should be assessed, from an environmental point of view, before a final decision can be taken;
- the use of PFOs in the plating industry should be restricted.
CONTENT: based on the above analysis this Directive restricts the placing on the market, and the use of, PFOs in the EU. It covers all major “exposure” risks. Thus, PFOs may not be placed on the market or used as a substance or constituent of preparations in concentrations equal to or higher than 0,005% of the mass. The use of PFOs that are deemed to carry a “minor” risk are, currently, exempted from the Directive (for example, photographic coatings applied to films, papers or printing plates). The derogations are, however, subject to regular reviews.
In other areas the Directive:
- gives special attention to the plating processes that rely on PFOs and the releases from those process through the application of best available techniques (BATs);
- restricts the use of semi-finished products and articles containing PFOs in order to protect the environment. The restrictions will cover all products and articles to which PFOs are intentionally added;
- will apply only to new products and not to products already in use or on the second hand market. However, existing stocks of fire-fighting foams containing PFOs will need to be identified and their use only allowed for a limited period;
- requires the Commission to review each derogation once new information on safer alternatives becomes available;
- requires that perflorooctanic acid (PFOA), which has similar qualities to PFOs, to be kept under review.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 27 December 2006.
TRANSPOSITION: 27 December 2007.
APPLICATION: 27 June 2008.
The European Parliament adopted the resolution drafted by Carl SCHLYTER (Greens/EFA, SE) and confirmed a first-reading agreement between Parliament and Council. The resolution was adopted by 632 votes to 10 with 20 abstentions.
Under the agreement, the directive will ban the placing of PFOS on the market and their use as a substance or constituent of preparations in a concentration equal to or higher than 0.005% by mass. It will also outlaw the sale of PFOS or their use in semi-finished products or articles, or parts thereof, if the concentration of PFOS is equal to or higher than 0.1% by mass or, for textiles or other coated materials, if the amount of PFOS is equal to or higher than 1 µg/m2 of the coated material. Under the directive, substances and preparations needed to produce photoresists or anti-reflective coatings for photolithography processes, photographic coatings applied to films, papers, or printing plates may contain PFOS in larger quantities. The same applies to suppressants for non-decorative hard chromium (VI) plating and wetting agents for use in controlled electroplating systems as well as hydraulic fluids for aviation.
Regarding fire-fighting foams, the initially proposed derogation was dropped. All new foams must be free of PFOS. Foams that have been placed on the market before the directive enters into force can be used until 54 months after its entry into force. Two years after entry into force, Member States must compile and send to the Commission an inventory listing the processes for chromium plating subject to derogation, the amounts of PFOS used in and released into the environment, and existing stocks of fire-fighting foams.
When reviewing derogations in the light of new information, the Commission must ensure that: the uses of PFOS are phased out as soon as the use of safer alternatives is technically and economically feasible; a derogation is only continued for essential uses for which safer alternatives do not exist and where it has been reported what has been undertaken to find safer alternatives; releases of PFOS into the environment have been minimised, by applying best available techniques.
Lastly, the Commission will keep under review the ongoing risk assessment activities and the availability of safer alternative substances or technologies related to the uses of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and related substances and propose any measures needed to reduce identified risks, including restrictions of marketing and use, in particular when safer alternative substances or technologies which are technically and economically feasible are available.
Member States will have 18 months to enact the directive in national law, i.e. up to mid-2008.
The committee adopted the report by Carl SCHLYTER (Greens/EFA, SE) amending - under the 1st reading of the codecision procedure - the proposed directive on restrictions on the marketing and use of perfluorooctane sulfonates (PFOS):
- the title was amended so that the directive would also apply to perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), which has a similar structure and toxicity to PFOS,
- PFOS should not be placed on the market or used as a substance or constituent of preparations in a concentration equal to or higher than 0.005% by mass (as opposed to 0.1% by mass proposed by the Commission). Nor should it be placed on the market in articles or parts thereof in a concentration equal to or higher than 0.005% by mass in a homogenous material that cannot be mechanically disjointed into different materials. These two conditions would apply to PFOA three years after the directive's entry into force;
- the proposed derogations for certain products using PFOS should be time-limited: 8 years for photoresists or anti-reflective coatings for photolithography processes; 6 years for industrial photographic coatings applied to films, papers or printing; and 10 years for hydraulic fluids for aviation. These time-limited derogations may be extended on a case-by-case basis if no safer alternatives have become available;
- the proposed derogations for mist suppressants for chromium plating and for fire-fighting foams were deleted, but the committee proposed that fire-fighting foams may be used up to 18 months after the directive's entry into force;
- the committee proposed a tighter definition of controlled closed systems ("where the concentration of PFOS released into the environment and the workplace is less than 1μg per kg of the PFOS used in the system processes") and imposed a time-limit of six years;
- Member States should establish inventories of uses of PFOS and PFOA on their own, in preparations or in articles, and take steps to prevent discharges, emissions and loss of PFOS and PFOA from the inventoried products.
PURPOSE : to place restrictions on the marketing and use of perfluorooctane sulfonates and amend Council Directive 76/769/EEC.
PROPOSED ACT : Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
CONTENT : Perfluorooctane sulfonates (PFOS) are anions that are commercially available in the form of salts, derivatives and polymers. The major uses for PFOS-related substances were in providing grease, oil and water resistance to materials such as textiles, carpets, paper and in general coating. The substances used in these areas were largely PFOS-polymers for fabrics and PFOS-substances for paper treatment and coatings. Other smaller volume uses are in chromium plating, photography, photolithography, fire fighting foams and in hydraulic fluids for aviation.
Recent studies have shown PFOs to be persistent in the environment, bio accumulative and toxic to mammalian species.
The risk assessment identified a need for reducing the risks to health and the environment from PFOS. The risk reduction strategy recommended marketing and use restrictions for certain uses. The proposed Directive would cover the great part of the exposure risks by preventing the use of PFOS in carpets, textiles, upholstery, leather, apparel, paper, packaging and other applications. These uses seem already to be phased out and the proposal would prevent their reintroduction. There are some further smaller and specific uses in chromium plating, photography, photolithography, fire fighting foams and in hydraulic fluids for aviation. The volumes used in these limited areas, and the emissions into the environment, would need to be further assessed, but they are currently expected to be very small. The advantages and disadvantages of regulating these uses would have to be subject to impact assessment.
Council Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations should therefore be amended accordingly.
The objective of the Directive would be to introduce harmonised provisions with regard to PFOS, thus preserving the internal market whilst ensuring a high level of protection of human health and the environment, as required by Article 95 of the Treaty.
PURPOSE : to place restrictions on the marketing and use of perfluorooctane sulfonates and amend Council Directive 76/769/EEC.
PROPOSED ACT : Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
CONTENT : Perfluorooctane sulfonates (PFOS) are anions that are commercially available in the form of salts, derivatives and polymers. The major uses for PFOS-related substances were in providing grease, oil and water resistance to materials such as textiles, carpets, paper and in general coating. The substances used in these areas were largely PFOS-polymers for fabrics and PFOS-substances for paper treatment and coatings. Other smaller volume uses are in chromium plating, photography, photolithography, fire fighting foams and in hydraulic fluids for aviation.
Recent studies have shown PFOs to be persistent in the environment, bio accumulative and toxic to mammalian species.
The risk assessment identified a need for reducing the risks to health and the environment from PFOS. The risk reduction strategy recommended marketing and use restrictions for certain uses. The proposed Directive would cover the great part of the exposure risks by preventing the use of PFOS in carpets, textiles, upholstery, leather, apparel, paper, packaging and other applications. These uses seem already to be phased out and the proposal would prevent their reintroduction. There are some further smaller and specific uses in chromium plating, photography, photolithography, fire fighting foams and in hydraulic fluids for aviation. The volumes used in these limited areas, and the emissions into the environment, would need to be further assessed, but they are currently expected to be very small. The advantages and disadvantages of regulating these uses would have to be subject to impact assessment.
Council Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations should therefore be amended accordingly.
The objective of the Directive would be to introduce harmonised provisions with regard to PFOS, thus preserving the internal market whilst ensuring a high level of protection of human health and the environment, as required by Article 95 of the Treaty.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2006/122
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 372 27.12.2006, p. 0032-0034
- Draft final act: 03660/1/2006
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2006)5316/2
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T6-0444/2006
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0251/2006
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A6-0251/2006
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE376.358
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE374.361
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0731/2006
- Committee draft report: PE372.192
- Legislative proposal: COM(2005)0618
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2005)0618
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2005)0618 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE372.192
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0731/2006
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE374.361
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE376.358
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0251/2006
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2006)5316/2
- Draft final act: 03660/1/2006
Activities
- Janusz ONYSZKIEWICZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Avril DOYLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gyula HEGYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jens HOLM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Holger KRAHMER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marios MATSAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Carl SCHLYTER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Thomas ULMER
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport Schlyter A6-0251/2006 - résolution #
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/10/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:372:SOM:EN:HTMLNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2006:372:TOC |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE372.192New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE372.192 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0731)(documentyear:2006)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0731)(documentyear:2006)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE374.361New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE374.361 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE376.358New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE376.358 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0251_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0251_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=12506&j=0&l=en
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061024&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20061024&type=CRE |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
New
Directive |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-251&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0251_EN.html |
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-251&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0251_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-444New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0444_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ENVI/6/32396New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32006L0122New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32006L0122 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
DirectiveNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0618/COM_COM(2005)0618_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0618/COM_COM(2005)0618_EN.pdf |
activities/10/docs/1/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2006:372:TOCNew
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:372:SOM:EN:HTML |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|