BETA


2005/2022(INI) European contract law and the revision of the acquis: the way forward

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead JURI LEHNE Klaus-Heiner (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion IMCO WALLIS Diana (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion LIBE
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2006/06/30
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/04/19
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/03/23
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2006/03/23
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Klaus-Heiner LEHNE (EPP-ED, DE) on European contract law and the revision of the acquis. (Please see the summary of 23/02/2006.)

Parliament stated in the recitals that, even though the Commission denied that this is its objective, it was clear that many of the researchers and stakeholders working on the project believe that the ultimate long-term outcome will be a European code of obligations or even a full-blown European Civil Code. In any event, the project is by far the most important initiative under way in the civil law field. Even if the initiative in its present form were limited to rationalising and tidying up the acquis in the field of consumer protection and to producing optional standard contract terms and conditions, it was essential that the political authorities had a proper input into the process.

Underlying principles and objectives: Parliament repeated its conviction that a uniform internal market cannot be fully functional without further steps towards the harmonisation of civil law. It called on the Commission to exploit straightaway the ongoing work with a view to using the results firstly towards the revision of the acquis in the field of civil law, and subsequently towards developing a system of Community civil law.

Substantive law issues: the Commission is asked to distinguish between legal provisions applicable to the business-to-business sector and those applicable to the business-to-consumer sector, and to separate the two systematically. Parliament highlighted the importance of taking into account the fundamental principle of freedom to conclude a contract, particularly in the business-to-business sector, and also highlighted the importance of taking into account the European social model when harmonising contract law.

Parliament noted that with over-detailed legal provisions on individual aspects of contract law there is a danger of being unable to react flexibly to altered legal circumstances. It favoured the adoption of general regulations including legal concepts which are not precisely defined, thus giving the courts the necessary margin of discretion in arriving at their judgments.

Procedural issues: Parliament called on the Commission to submit without delay a clear legislative plan setting out the future legal instruments by which it aimed to bring the results of the work of the research groups and the CFR-Net into use in legal transactions. The Commission should keep Parliament continually informed, at least in quarterly reports, of the results obtained and progress of the work of the research groups and of the Network. The resolution stressed the importance of Parliament’s need for information and consultation.

Documents
2006/03/23
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/03/22
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2006/03/03
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2006/03/03
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2006/02/23
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Klaus-Heiner LEHNE (EPP-ED, DE) in response to the Commission communication on European contract law and the revision of the acquis . The report sought to map out a strategic perspective for the future work of the Commission and the network of interest representatives from consumers' organisations, industry, business and the legal profession set up with a view to the creation of a Common Frame of Reference (CFR) on Community contract law. MEPs were particularly concerned to ensure that Parliament was fully involved in this process.

The report reiterated Parliament's previous assertions that a uniform internal market cannot be fully functional without further steps towards the harmonisation of civil law. It urged the Commission, in its revision of the acquis in the field of consumer protection, to use the results of the work carried out by the CFR Network and by academic research groups on the drafting of European contract law with a view to developing a common civil law.

As regards substantive law issues, MEPs highlighted the need to take account of the "fundamental principle of freedom to conclude a contract". They also called on the Commission to ensure that there was systematic separation between the business-to-business and the business-to-consumer sectors. The report noted that over-detailed legal provisions on individual aspects of contract law could lead to a lack of flexibility, and called for the adoption of "general regulations including legal concepts which are not precisely defined", thereby allowing courts the necessary margin of discretion in arriving at their judgments.

On procedural issues, the committee urged the Commission to submit a "clear legislative plan" setting out the future legal instruments by which it intended to bring the results of the research groups and the CFR Network into use in legal transactions. Moreover, MEPs wanted Parliament to be given a greater role in developing the CFR, through more consultation and information. The Commission was urged, on the basis of the researchers' final report, to submit the various possible legal options to Parliament, whose political approval, along with the Council's, was required for the final adoption of the Common Framework of Reference.

2006/02/08
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2006/01/25
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2006/01/25
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2005/11/28
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
Details

The Council adopted the following conclusions on European Contract Law. It recalled its Resolution of 22 September 2003, in which it considered that community law rules, in particular in the area of contract law, should be consistent and ensure proper transposition into national law. In this context, the Common Frame of Reference could contribute to improving the quality and consistency of both existing and future Community legislation in this area.

The Council recognises the unique opportunity afforded by the proposed Review and the introduction of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (2005/29/EC) to update and modernise the consumer acquis.

The Council emphasises :

- the need for work to focus on practical issues in order to deliver real benefits to consumers and business;

- the need to acknowledge the distinction between business-to-consumer and business-to-business contracts;

- the need for the Consumer Acquis to be fit for purpose, to protect the legal and economic interests and rights of consumers, to enhance the confidence of the EU's citizens in the Internal Market, and to promote the cross-border provision of goods and services, thus guaranteeing a high level of consumer protection.

The Commission is invited to :

- come forward as soon as possible with a timetable, a detailed description of the process, and proposals for updating and modernising the Consumer Acquis and also to reprioritise accordingly the work on the Common Frame of Reference. The Council also looks forward to receiving more information from the Commission on the Review of the Consumer Acquis during 2006;

- keep the Council and European Parliament fully informed and consulted about its work in this area, to ensure maximum political engagement.

The Member States are invited to :

- co-operate with and help the Commission's work on gathering evidence concerning the implementation and functioning of the existing Consumer Acquis;

- actively participate in the Commission's work on the Common Frame of Reference encourage the contributions of stakeholders to the ongoing discussions at EU level.

2005/11/28
   CSL - Council Meeting
2005/05/12
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2005/05/12
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2005/04/18
   EP - WALLIS Diana (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO
2004/11/24
   EP - LEHNE Klaus-Heiner (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2004/10/11
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: To present a communication entitled ‘European Contract Law and the revision of the acquis : the way forward’.

CONTENT: This Communication sets out the Commission's follow-up to the 2003 Action Plan ‘ A more coherent European Contract Law’ , in the light of the reactions from EU institutions, Member States and stakeholders. It outlines the plan for developing the Common Frame of Reference, which will provide clear definitions of legal terms, fundamental principles and coherent model rules of contract law, drawing on the EC acquis and on best solutions found in Member States' legal orders. The adoption of the Common Frame of Reference is foreseen for 2009 following extensive consultation and it will be used in particular as a "toolbox" for the Commission when presenting proposals to improve the quality and coherence of the existing and future acquis in the area of contract law.

The Communication also sets out the plans for further work on the other measures mentioned in the Action Plan: promoting the elaboration of EU-wide standard contract terms and reflection on the opportuneness of an optional instrument .

2004/10/10
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: To present a communication entitled ‘European Contract Law and the revision of the acquis : the way forward’.

CONTENT: This Communication sets out the Commission's follow-up to the 2003 Action Plan ‘ A more coherent European Contract Law’ , in the light of the reactions from EU institutions, Member States and stakeholders. It outlines the plan for developing the Common Frame of Reference, which will provide clear definitions of legal terms, fundamental principles and coherent model rules of contract law, drawing on the EC acquis and on best solutions found in Member States' legal orders. The adoption of the Common Frame of Reference is foreseen for 2009 following extensive consultation and it will be used in particular as a "toolbox" for the Commission when presenting proposals to improve the quality and coherence of the existing and future acquis in the area of contract law.

The Communication also sets out the plans for further work on the other measures mentioned in the Action Plan: promoting the elaboration of EU-wide standard contract terms and reflection on the opportuneness of an optional instrument .

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/associated
Old
True
New
 
docs/0
date
2004-10-11T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/1
date
2006-01-25T00:00:00
docs
title: PE364.753
committee
IMCO
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/2
date
2006-01-25T00:00:00
docs
title: PE364.753
committee
IMCO
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-364753_EN.html
docs/4
date
2006-04-19T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2006)1725
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/5
date
2006-04-19T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2006)1725
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/5
date
2006-06-30T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4550&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)1918
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/5/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4550&j=0&l=en
docs/6
date
2006-06-30T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4550&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)1918
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4550&j=0&l=en
New
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4550&j=1&l=en
events/0
date
2004-10-10T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2004-10-11T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
docs/0
date
2006-01-25T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE359.934 title: PE359.934
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/0
date
2004-10-11T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE359.934
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE359.934
docs/1
date
2006-01-25T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE359.934 title: PE359.934
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/1
date
2006-01-25T00:00:00
docs
title: PE364.753
committee
IMCO
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/2
date
2006-01-25T00:00:00
docs
title: PE364.753
committee
IMCO
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/2
date
2006-02-08T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE369.914 title: PE369.914
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE364.753&secondRef=02
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE369.914
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE369.914
docs/3
date
2006-02-08T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE369.914 title: PE369.914
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/3
date
2006-03-03T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0055_EN.html title: A6-0055/2006
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0055_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0055_EN.html
docs/4
date
2006-03-03T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0055_EN.html title: A6-0055/2006
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs/4
date
2006-04-19T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2006)1725
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/5
date
2006-04-19T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2006)1725
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/5/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4550&j=1&l=en
events/0
date
2004-10-11T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2004-10-11T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/4/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/5
date
2006-03-03T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0055_EN.html title: A6-0055/2006
events/5
date
2006-03-03T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0055_EN.html title: A6-0055/2006
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060322&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20060322&type=CRE
events/8
date
2006-03-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0109_EN.html title: T6-0109/2006
summary
events/8
date
2006-03-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0109_EN.html title: T6-0109/2006
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2004-11-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: WALLIS Diana date: 2005-04-18T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2005-04-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WALLIS Diana group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0651/COM_COM(2004)0651_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0651/COM_COM(2004)0651_EN.pdf
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE364.753
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE364.753&secondRef=02
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-55&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0055_EN.html
docs/5/body
EC
docs/6/body
EC
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0651/COM_COM(2004)0651_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0651/COM_COM(2004)0651_EN.pdf
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-55&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0055_EN.html
events/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-109
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0109_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2004-10-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0651/COM_COM(2004)0651_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0651 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52004DC0651:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/index_en.htm title: Health and Consumers type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2005-05-12T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2005-04-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: WALLIS Diana body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2694 council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) date: 2005-11-28T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2006-02-23T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2005-04-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: WALLIS Diana body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-03-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-55&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0055/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-03-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060322&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4550&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-109 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0109/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Health and Food Safety commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2004-11-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
IMCO
date
2005-04-18T00:00:00
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: WALLIS Diana
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2005-04-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WALLIS Diana group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
JURI
date
2004-11-24T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) meeting_id: 2694 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2694*&MEET_DATE=28/11/2005 date: 2005-11-28T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2004-10-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0651/COM_COM(2004)0651_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0651 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=651 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: To present a communication entitled ‘European Contract Law and the revision of the acquis : the way forward’. CONTENT: This Communication sets out the Commission's follow-up to the 2003 Action Plan ‘ A more coherent European Contract Law’ , in the light of the reactions from EU institutions, Member States and stakeholders. It outlines the plan for developing the Common Frame of Reference, which will provide clear definitions of legal terms, fundamental principles and coherent model rules of contract law, drawing on the EC acquis and on best solutions found in Member States' legal orders. The adoption of the Common Frame of Reference is foreseen for 2009 following extensive consultation and it will be used in particular as a "toolbox" for the Commission when presenting proposals to improve the quality and coherence of the existing and future acquis in the area of contract law. The Communication also sets out the plans for further work on the other measures mentioned in the Action Plan: promoting the elaboration of EU-wide standard contract terms and reflection on the opportuneness of an optional instrument . type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE359.934 title: PE359.934 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE364.753 title: PE364.753 committee: IMCO type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2006-02-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE369.914 title: PE369.914 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2006-03-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-55&language=EN title: A6-0055/2006 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-04-19T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4550&j=1&l=en title: SP(2006)1725 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2006-06-30T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4550&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)1918 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2004-10-11T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0651/COM_COM(2004)0651_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0651 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=651 title: EUR-Lex summary: This Communication sets out the Commission's follow-up to the 2003 Action Plan, in the light of the reactions from EU institutions, Member States and stakeholders. It outlines how the Common Frame of Reference (CFR) will be developed to improve the coherence of the existing and future acquis, and sets out specific plans for the parts of the acquis nrelevant to consumer protection, in line with the Consumer Policy Strategy 2002-2006. It also describes planned activities concerning the promotion of EU-wide standard contract terms and intends to continue the reflection on the appropriateness of an optional instrument. Contributors to the Action Plan supported the need to improve the quality and consistency of the acquis in the area of contract law and emphasised that the CFR could contribute to that goal. In the light of this significant support the Commission will pursue the elaboration of the CFR. The CFR will provide clear definitions of legal terms, fundamental principles and coherent model rules of contract law, drawing on the EC acquis and on best solutions found in Member States' legal orders. With regard to possible uses, the Commission states the following : - the Commission will use the CFR as a toolbox, where appropriate, when presenting proposals to improve the quality and coherence of the existing acquis and future legal instruments in the area of contract law. At the same time, it will serve the purpose of simplifying the acquis; - national legislators could use the CFR when transposing EU directives in the area of contract law into national legislation; - another role, suggested by the European Parliament, is the possible use of the CFR in arbitration; - Parliament indicated that the CFR could be developed into a body of standard contract terms to be made available to legal practitioners; - the Commission is considering the suggestion that it could integrate the CFR in the contracts concluded with its contractors; - finally the CFR, based on the EC acquis and on best solutions identified as common to Member States contract laws, could inspire the European Court of Justice when interpreting the acquis on contract law. In order to ensure that the CFR is of high quality the Commission will finance three years of research under the Sixth Framework Programme for research and technological development1. Proposals for research were evaluated and work is expected to begin soon. The structure envisaged for the CFR (an example for a possible structure is provided in Annex I) is: - it would set out common fundamental principles of contract law, including guidance on when exceptions to such fundamental principles could be required; - secondly, those fundamental principles would be supported by definitions of key concepts; - these principles and definitions would be completed by model rules, forming the bulk of the CFR. Two types of contracts which were mentioned specifically were consumer and insurance contracts. The Commission expects the preparation of the CFR to pay specific attention to these two areas. Other areas mentioned specifically which the CFR could cover were contracts of sale and services and clauses relating to the retention of title and the transfer of title of goods. The adoption of the CFR by the Commission is foreseen for 2009.
  • date: 2005-05-12T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-05-12T00:00:00 type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2005-11-28T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL summary: The Council adopted the following conclusions on European Contract Law. It recalled its Resolution of 22 September 2003, in which it considered that community law rules, in particular in the area of contract law, should be consistent and ensure proper transposition into national law. In this context, the Common Frame of Reference could contribute to improving the quality and consistency of both existing and future Community legislation in this area. The Council recognises the unique opportunity afforded by the proposed Review and the introduction of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (2005/29/EC) to update and modernise the consumer acquis. The Council emphasises : - the need for work to focus on practical issues in order to deliver real benefits to consumers and business; - the need to acknowledge the distinction between business-to-consumer and business-to-business contracts; - the need for the Consumer Acquis to be fit for purpose, to protect the legal and economic interests and rights of consumers, to enhance the confidence of the EU's citizens in the Internal Market, and to promote the cross-border provision of goods and services, thus guaranteeing a high level of consumer protection. The Commission is invited to : - come forward as soon as possible with a timetable, a detailed description of the process, and proposals for updating and modernising the Consumer Acquis and also to reprioritise accordingly the work on the Common Frame of Reference. The Council also looks forward to receiving more information from the Commission on the Review of the Consumer Acquis during 2006; - keep the Council and European Parliament fully informed and consulted about its work in this area, to ensure maximum political engagement. The Member States are invited to : - co-operate with and help the Commission's work on gathering evidence concerning the implementation and functioning of the existing Consumer Acquis; - actively participate in the Commission's work on the Common Frame of Reference encourage the contributions of stakeholders to the ongoing discussions at EU level.
  • date: 2006-02-23T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Klaus-Heiner LEHNE (EPP-ED, DE) in response to the Commission communication on European contract law and the revision of the acquis . The report sought to map out a strategic perspective for the future work of the Commission and the network of interest representatives from consumers' organisations, industry, business and the legal profession set up with a view to the creation of a Common Frame of Reference (CFR) on Community contract law. MEPs were particularly concerned to ensure that Parliament was fully involved in this process. The report reiterated Parliament's previous assertions that a uniform internal market cannot be fully functional without further steps towards the harmonisation of civil law. It urged the Commission, in its revision of the acquis in the field of consumer protection, to use the results of the work carried out by the CFR Network and by academic research groups on the drafting of European contract law with a view to developing a common civil law. As regards substantive law issues, MEPs highlighted the need to take account of the "fundamental principle of freedom to conclude a contract". They also called on the Commission to ensure that there was systematic separation between the business-to-business and the business-to-consumer sectors. The report noted that over-detailed legal provisions on individual aspects of contract law could lead to a lack of flexibility, and called for the adoption of "general regulations including legal concepts which are not precisely defined", thereby allowing courts the necessary margin of discretion in arriving at their judgments. On procedural issues, the committee urged the Commission to submit a "clear legislative plan" setting out the future legal instruments by which it intended to bring the results of the research groups and the CFR Network into use in legal transactions. Moreover, MEPs wanted Parliament to be given a greater role in developing the CFR, through more consultation and information. The Commission was urged, on the basis of the researchers' final report, to submit the various possible legal options to Parliament, whose political approval, along with the Council's, was required for the final adoption of the Common Framework of Reference.
  • date: 2006-03-03T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-55&language=EN title: A6-0055/2006
  • date: 2006-03-22T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060322&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-03-23T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4550&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-03-23T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-109 title: T6-0109/2006 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Klaus-Heiner LEHNE (EPP-ED, DE) on European contract law and the revision of the acquis. (Please see the summary of 23/02/2006.) Parliament stated in the recitals that, even though the Commission denied that this is its objective, it was clear that many of the researchers and stakeholders working on the project believe that the ultimate long-term outcome will be a European code of obligations or even a full-blown European Civil Code. In any event, the project is by far the most important initiative under way in the civil law field. Even if the initiative in its present form were limited to rationalising and tidying up the acquis in the field of consumer protection and to producing optional standard contract terms and conditions, it was essential that the political authorities had a proper input into the process. Underlying principles and objectives: Parliament repeated its conviction that a uniform internal market cannot be fully functional without further steps towards the harmonisation of civil law. It called on the Commission to exploit straightaway the ongoing work with a view to using the results firstly towards the revision of the acquis in the field of civil law, and subsequently towards developing a system of Community civil law. Substantive law issues: the Commission is asked to distinguish between legal provisions applicable to the business-to-business sector and those applicable to the business-to-consumer sector, and to separate the two systematically. Parliament highlighted the importance of taking into account the fundamental principle of freedom to conclude a contract, particularly in the business-to-business sector, and also highlighted the importance of taking into account the European social model when harmonising contract law. Parliament noted that with over-detailed legal provisions on individual aspects of contract law there is a danger of being unable to react flexibly to altered legal circumstances. It favoured the adoption of general regulations including legal concepts which are not precisely defined, thus giving the courts the necessary margin of discretion in arriving at their judgments. Procedural issues: Parliament called on the Commission to submit without delay a clear legislative plan setting out the future legal instruments by which it aimed to bring the results of the work of the research groups and the CFR-Net into use in legal transactions. The Commission should keep Parliament continually informed, at least in quarterly reports, of the results obtained and progress of the work of the research groups and of the Network. The resolution stressed the importance of Parliament’s need for information and consultation.
  • date: 2006-03-23T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/index_en.htm title: Health and Consumers
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
JURI/6/26421
New
  • JURI/6/26421
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.60.06 Consumers' economic and legal interests
  • 7.40.02 Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters
New
4.60.06
Consumers' economic and legal interests
7.40.02
Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0651/COM_COM(2004)0651_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0651/COM_COM(2004)0651_EN.pdf
activities
  • date: 2004-10-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0651/COM_COM(2004)0651_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52004DC0651:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2004)0651 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/index_en.htm title: Health and Consumers
  • date: 2005-05-12T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2005-04-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: WALLIS Diana body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2694 council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) date: 2005-11-28T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2006-02-23T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2005-04-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: WALLIS Diana body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-03-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-55&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0055/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-03-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060322&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4550&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-109 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0109/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2005-04-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: WALLIS Diana
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2004-11-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/index_en.htm title: Health and Consumers
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
JURI/6/26421
reference
2005/2022(INI)
title
European contract law and the revision of the acquis: the way forward
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject